Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Space Archaeologist Wants Your Help To Find Ancient Sites

  1. #1
    Tot Founder England The One's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th September 2013
    Location
    In-Be-Tween
    Posts
    10,966
    Thanks
    26,697
    Thanked 48,695 Times in 10,223 Posts

    Space Archaeologist Wants Your Help To Find Ancient Sites

    Listen to the story



    A satellite image of the archaeological site of Tanis, after processing. Sarah Parcak used satellite data to find the ancient Egyptian city.

    Sarah Parcak is a space archaeologist. She uses satellite imagery to track looted ancient burial sites and find pyramids hidden under Egyptian cities. Now, she has bigger plans: to launch a worldwide campaign to make all of us space archaeologists.

    She will be doing it through a digital platform called Global Xplorer, which will utilize crowdsourcing and satellite images to discover and protect unknown archaeological sites around the world. Parcak is the 2016 TED Prize winner — and she plans to launch the platform with the $1 million award that comes with the prize.

    Parcak explains to NPR's Ari Shapiro how she plans to "game-ify" archaeological research and how she is enlisting everyone's help to pull it off.

    "This is going to be a super high tech version of Google Earth," she says. "My team and I are going to process lots of satellite imagery and they'll be put on this platform."

    Users will be given a small card from a deck that shows real, processed satellite imagery of a plot of land not more than 20 by 20 or 30 by 30 meters in size. There will be clues and keys by the side of the picture to help them identify whether they're seeing a known site, like a pyramid, or a new site.

    But the satellite images can be blurry and it can be hard to distinguish patterns in them, even after the images are processed. To circumvent this problem, Parcak says users will actually be given two images: One that's unprocessed, one that's been enhanced. She wants users to compare the two pictures.

    "When you look at images that are enhanced, the details pop much more," she says.



    Parcak and her team will also help users identify the type of site or building in the images by allowing them to compare what they see with known examples of archaeological sites. For example, users can see pictures of what excavated Egyptian houses look like from different periods of time, so they can put tags on the pictures with the descriptions.

    "As the crowd populates these images with their tags, after 10, 20 or 50 users tell us that something is there, we'll know to be able to check, to confirm, one way or another," Parcak says.

    While everyone might not be an expert in archaeology or history, Parcak hopes that this method will help researchers identify more sites around the world, even in places where they never thought to look. Crowdsourcing, she says, will give them "lots of fresh pairs of eyes."

    "The biggest problem we have when looking at satellite imagery is not the processing," she says. "The hardest part is actually eye fatigue. ... Imagine hours and hours looking at satellite imagery. We miss things."

    Once enough users identify a site, Parcak and her team will look at the data, pick specific examples and share them with academic archaeologists who might go out and excavate the sites.

    Here comes the best part: The crowd will be able to go along with them through applications like Periscope, Google Plus, Skype and Instagram.

    There is one caveat to the plan, however: GPS information can be extremely sensitive and fall in the wrong hands. Parcak has spoken out against groups like ISIS raising money by looting archaeological sites, and this app may provide looters a map to find treasure. Parcak says these maps won't reveal GPS locations and will mask the data.

    "We're treating an archaeological site as a human patient," she says. "We're protecting the actual data. ... We think by masking the location of the site we'll be pretty safe."

    Parcak hopes to launch the application later this summer or by early fall.

    "The idea is people can use this on their smartphones during their coffee break," she says. "We'll have a desktop version so people can use it in classrooms."

    Her ultimate goal is to launch it globally, with the app hosting different languages.

    "We're answering the big questions about who we are and where we've come from," she says. "And the fact that we can get the world to be a part of that is pretty exciting."

    Source
    No one person can ever change the truth, but the truth, once learned, can and will change the person

    You must be the change you wish to see in the world when you are through changing, you are through


    theonetruth forum status theonetruth facebook

  2. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to The One For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (21st March 2016), boja (21st March 2016), bsbray (21st March 2016), Dreamtimer (21st March 2016), Elen (22nd March 2016), Frances (21st March 2016), Joanna (22nd March 2016), Juniper (21st March 2016), Olaf (21st March 2016), RealityCreation (25th March 2016)

  3. #2
    (account terminated) United States
    Join Date
    16th January 2015
    Location
    Au dela
    Posts
    2,901
    Thanks
    17,558
    Thanked 12,648 Times in 2,895 Posts
    This is an amazing opportunity to democratize a field that has been dominated by the academic elite, including the crooked likes of Hawass in Egypt.

    Thanks for posting this Malc. I already signed up on the Global Explorer website to wait for further instructions. Even if we all just dig around in our own "back yards," who knows what we might find.

  4. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to bsbray For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (21st March 2016), Dreamtimer (21st March 2016), Elen (22nd March 2016), Joanna (22nd March 2016), Juniper (21st March 2016), RealityCreation (25th March 2016), The One (21st March 2016)

  5. #3
    Retired Member United States
    Join Date
    7th April 2015
    Location
    Patapsco Valley
    Posts
    14,610
    Thanks
    70,673
    Thanked 62,025 Times in 14,520 Posts
    "Even if we all just dig around in our own "back yards," who knows what we might find." More mounds maybe.

  6. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Dreamtimer For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (21st March 2016), bsbray (22nd March 2016), Elen (22nd March 2016), Joanna (22nd March 2016), Juniper (21st March 2016), RealityCreation (25th March 2016), The One (21st March 2016)

  7. #4
    (account terminated) United States
    Join Date
    16th January 2015
    Location
    Au dela
    Posts
    2,901
    Thanks
    17,558
    Thanked 12,648 Times in 2,895 Posts
    Yes, there are tens of thousands of ancient mounds in the US alone, also some in Canada and of course a ton of them in Mexico where they are more well-known.

    For those that live in the US, there are ancient mounds in most states, maybe even all of them, east of the Mississippi River in the US, and a lot of crazy stuff west of it too. If you live in or near Ohio there are thousands of mounds in that state alone, not even counting ancient earthen walls, stone forts and other archaeological sites. There are lots of pre-historic constructions in all of the states surrounding Ohio and along the Mississippi River and its tributaries. The Smithsonian took and hid a lot of bizarre things out of some them, from giant skeletons to tablets with undeciphered scripts (Native Americans aren't supposed to have had any written language), and some mounds have probably never been excavated at all. The biggest known mound in the US is on the other side of the Mississippi from St. Louis, Missouri (Cahokia Mound), and it looks almost like a Mayan construction.

    Here are some pictures to give an idea of what you might be able to find in the US:


    Grave Creek Mound, West Virginia




    Fort Ancient Earthworks, Ohio




    Great Serpent Mound, Ohio (at the site of an ancient meteor impact that would have caused catastrophic damage)




    Cahokia Mounds, Illinois




    An artist's depiction of what the city at Cahokia would have looked like at its peak (~1200 AD), with an estimated 40,000 inhabitants (a very large city in its time, twice the population of Rome in 1200 AD):




    Another artist's rendering of Cahokia:




    Artist's depiction of a lunar alignment at the Newark Earthworks, Ohio (many of these sites were astronomical clocks of sorts, almost like Stonehenge and other pre-historic sites in Europe):




    An artist's depiction of the Kincaid Site in Illinois:




    A cross-section of what may be found in some of the mounds:




    There's tons about these ancient sites, and especially the cultures that built them, that we still do not understand at all. Why so many cultures built mounds isn't understood. These mounds, especially the larger ones, require an enormous amount of work from a community of thousands of people. Early estimates were that it would take a community of thousands of people a period of years to construct even one of some of these mounds.

    Interestingly, a team of researchers working in a 72-foot-high, 538,000-square-foot mound in Louisana dated back to around 1200 BC (~3200 years ago) concluded after excavating the site that it was built within 90 days. The layers of dirt they excavated actually showed no signs of having been rained on during construction, so they are talking about the massive mound having been built so fast that it was built between rains in Louisiana. It seems likely that it would have been constructed in an even shorter time than 3 months. This is not a dry area of the US; this is swampland by the coast, at the mouth of the Mississippi River. They estimate at least 3,000 people working steadily, carrying 55-pound buckets of dirt all day for three months, might have been able to do the job, but I would personally not be surprised if some other kind of technology or technique was used that we haven't thought of.

    As you can see above at the Kincaid site, some houses were built on top of large, steep mounds. Imagine the work it would require just to make that mound. A lot damn more than it would take to build the hut on top of it, that's for sure. So something is "off" about this. It's possible that one culture built the mounds and a later culture came along and built the more primitive hut on top of it.

    Some early researchers even suggested that maybe pre-historic Native Americans had tamed the mastodon and got it to plough the earth as a domesticated animal, the same way that Europeans tamed elephants and used them in warfare until they made them go extinct in that part of the world.

  8. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to bsbray For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (22nd March 2016), boja (22nd March 2016), Dreamtimer (22nd March 2016), Elen (22nd March 2016), Joanna (22nd March 2016), RealityCreation (25th March 2016), The One (22nd March 2016), Wind (22nd March 2016)

  9. #5
    Retired Member United States
    Join Date
    7th April 2015
    Location
    Patapsco Valley
    Posts
    14,610
    Thanks
    70,673
    Thanked 62,025 Times in 14,520 Posts
    Tamed mastodons. Wow. I'm thinking of Oliphants. How about giants? Aren't some of those artifacts that the Smithsonian took away very large humanoid bones? There are certainly many American Indian legends of giants.

    I'm fascinated by this and very annoyed at those who hide this stuff. Thanks very much for sharing these images.

  10. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Dreamtimer For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (22nd March 2016), bsbray (22nd March 2016), Elen (22nd March 2016), Joanna (22nd March 2016), RealityCreation (25th March 2016), The One (22nd March 2016)

  11. #6
    Retired Member
    Join Date
    23rd April 2015
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia.
    Posts
    628
    Thanks
    2,858
    Thanked 2,690 Times in 607 Posts
    Fascinating, Bsbray. That is certainly a lot of work, just to put little huts on top.

  12. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Joanna For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (22nd March 2016), bsbray (22nd March 2016), Elen (22nd March 2016), The One (22nd March 2016)

  13. #7
    (account terminated) United States
    Join Date
    16th January 2015
    Location
    Au dela
    Posts
    2,901
    Thanks
    17,558
    Thanked 12,648 Times in 2,895 Posts
    Quote Originally posted by Dreamtimer View Post
    How about giants? Aren't some of those artifacts that the Smithsonian took away very large humanoid bones? There are certainly many American Indian legends of giants.
    Yes:

    Giant Skeletons & The Smithsonian

    A host of researchers, including Vieira, Fritz Zimmerman, and Ross Hamilton, have publicized approximately 1,500 newspaper articles from the 1800s through the mid-1900s reporting on huge skeletons found at sites scattered across America. These articles mention skeletons ranging in height from seven to eighteen feet. In response, a 2012 reissued Smithsonian Magazine article related, “There was no prehistoric race of giants” (Science News (3/23/2012) “Measure your giant carefully and his size will shrink”). The statement only deepened the controversy.

    One fact cited as evidence for the conspiracy theory is that the Smithsonian has never displayed the giant skeletons. That’s true, but few of the large skeletons were sent to them. The main purpose of their investigation into mounds was to determine who built the mounds and to gather skulls as specimens. The other reason is that today the Smithsonian has less than 300 skeletal remains in storage, and those are from Central and South America. All other burial remains they held were repatriated and reburied starting in 1989 (Path of Souls).

    [...]

    The Smithsonian’s Mound Survey Project

    The Smithsonian’s Division of Mound Exploration (and the resulting Mound Survey Project) was established by an act of Congress in 1881. Cyrus Thomas was the project director and author of the annual reports’ sections on mounds. It is known that he often used the written reports from his field agents verbatim. The main project ran from 1882 to 1891. Three field agents were employed at a monthly pay of $125, which had to pay for travel, lodging, meals, and the hire of local laborers. Thomas related that the project opened “2,000 mounds” and recovered “40,000 specimens” (Path of Souls). The total number of skeletons found by the project isn’t known, because many mounds had jumbled skeletal remains, partial remains, cremations, and because many skeletons had simply disintegrated.

    Our analysis of the Bureau of Ethnology Annual Reports (1887; 1894) revealed that 17 “large” skeletons were excavated from mounds by the field agents. They ranged in length from 6’ 7” to 7’ 6”. At least 14 of them were seven feet or more in length. The mounds the large skeletons were recovered from were from Adena, Hopewell, and Mississippian sites. However, half of the seven footers were found in Adena Era mounds in West Virginia, primarily along the Kanawha River Valley (Path of Souls).

    It is important to note that the Bureau’s reports mentioned numerous other “large” skeletons that were found, but many were so disintegrated that accurate measuring was impossible. In essence, the Smithsonian didn’t cover up the discovery of these tall people; it simply didn’t call them “giants.” But this led us to look at other reports made by mainstream archaeologists.

    “Modern” Archaeological Discoveries of Giant Skeletons from Mounds

    In May 1950 William Webb and Charles Snow of the University of Kentucky began an excavation of a large Dover, Kentucky, burial mound. In the report on the six-month-long excavation (Webb, W. & Snow, C. (1959) The Dover Mound, U. of KY.), it was explained that the mound had been erected over several smaller mounds. Several log-lined tombs were found at the mound’s base. Carbon dating placed the mound in the Adena Era (220–300 BC).

    They found 55 burials, most of which had almost completely disintegrated. However, several log tombs at the base had survived fairly intact. Several skeletons of six-foot tall, robust men were found, but in one tomb the remains of four individuals were found lying. One skeleton was, “one of the largest known to Adena: the skull-foot field measurement is 84 inches.” Copper artifacts were found with this 7-foot-tall man along with mica, beads, flint, and shell artifacts (The Dover Mound)

    In 1958, archaeologist Don Dragoo of the Carnegie Museum excavated the Cresap Mound located south of Moundsville, WV. Dragoo found 54 burials in the mound. One skeleton was found in a prominent log-covered tomb under the mound base floor with a tablet, shell artifacts, red ochre, flint, blades, and beads. The skeleton found inside this tomb was a “tall adult male” with “flexed knees” … “When measured in the tomb his length was approximately 7.04 feet” [7 feet one inch] (Dragoo, D. (1963) “Mounds for the dead,” Annals of the Carnegie Museum, V. 57.).

    There are numerous other examples of mainstream archaeologists excavating large skeletons from Adena mounds. The Welcome Mound in West Virginia was excavated in 1957 by Frank Setzler of the Smithsonian. Inside a log tomb he found the badly deteriorated skeleton of a “large” man. Because of the artifacts found with him, the man was determined to have been a shaman. Setzler also mentioned that the 7-foot-tall skeleton found at the Dover Mound was also a shaman and that a similar shaman burial had been found at the Ayres Mound in Kentucky (Dragoo). Excavation of the Beech Bottom Mound near Wheeling, West Virginia also revealed a shaman buried in a prominent tomb (Webb, W. & Snow, C.). A 1940 excavation of the Half Moon Mound site along the Ohio River in West Virginia revealed another elite burial of a shaman (Webb, W. & Snow, C.). Unfortunately, in many of these cases the skeletal remains had almost completely disintegrated making measurements impossible. In summary, it is clear that many Adena Era mound burials were of elite individuals. These individuals were exceedingly tall, and many of them were probably shamans involved with the Native American death journey.

    Skeptical Claims & Adena Population Height: A Statistical View

    Virtually all of the claims made by skeptics about the large skeletons have been shown to be false (Little, G., 2014, “The truth about giant skeletons in American Indian Mounds- 1,2.” http://www.apmagazine.info). There is no doubt that many tall individuals were interred in prominent tombs in America’s ancient mounds. Many of them were shamans and others were no doubt chiefs. But the important question is: could this simply be due to chance? Many people point to tall basketball players as a way of implying that tall people are found everywhere. But statistically speaking, in the modern world, the actual percentage of people who reach 7 feet in height is 0.000007%—or one in every 146,000 people. Applying this number to the Smithsonian’s discoveries, they would have had to excavate 2.5 million skeletons to find 17 individuals of that height (Path of Souls). But the Hopewell and Adena were much shorter: Adena men averaged 5’ 4” while Hopewell men averaged 5’ 6”. Applying the relevant statistical tool to the Adena height shows that only 0.0000002% of them would reach 7 feet (one of every 1.4 million people). Clearly, something unexplained is at work.
    http://atlantisrisingmagazine.com/20...rs-in-america/


    Not all of the skeletons found in these mounds were giants, and apparently most of them were rather short by modern standards. That make the ones that are "giant" by today's standards stick out even more. And the idea as presented above (by Gregory Little, who authored The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Native American Mounds & Earthworks) is that the tall guys held important positions in the tribe.

    A lot of comparisons have been drawn between Native Americans and civilizations in the ancient Middle East, even a genetic "halpoid group X" connection between some old Cherokee lines and the ancient inhabitants of the area around the Sea of Galilee. There were giants in the Middle East too, as recorded in the Bible, Arab stories and elsewhere, and who were these giants in the Middle East? They were kings and leaders of their tribes. Why? Because the people of great stature were "sons of God," as the Bible puts it. The Book of Enoch puts it even more plainly, that they were the offpspring between "fallen angels" and mankind. Just as a very angry Jehovah later ordered the Jews to exterminate all of their tribes after the Exodus from Egypt, Native Americans also say that they made war on giant tribes of cannabalistic, "evil" giants, until they were annihilated.

    Maybe we could split a separate topic off for this?

  14. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to bsbray For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (22nd March 2016), Dreamtimer (22nd March 2016), Joanna (25th March 2016), RealityCreation (25th March 2016)

  15. #8
    Retired Member United States
    Join Date
    7th April 2015
    Location
    Patapsco Valley
    Posts
    14,610
    Thanks
    70,673
    Thanked 62,025 Times in 14,520 Posts
    I'll vote for a thread on the question of giants. I've already heard so many interesting stories. And this thread can remain focused on the satellite research.

    One interview I listened to was of Tom Horne and Chris Putnam. They were discussing their research which involved Mt. Graham and the Vatican telescope. They were talking to an apache man about some ancient stuff such as the Anasazi, and he told them a story his grandfather would have told back in the day.

    A 'snake priest' came and taught the ancient shamans some rituals and spells which they mastered. When they were performed in the kivas they caused portals to open in the ground through which came savage cannibalistic giants and the people had to flee or were eaten. The giants ended up cannibalizing each other and the remainder were killed off.
    Last edited by Dreamtimer, 22nd March 2016 at 18:47.

  16. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Dreamtimer For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (22nd March 2016), bsbray (22nd March 2016), Elen (25th March 2016), Joanna (25th March 2016), RealityCreation (25th March 2016)

  17. #9
    Retired Member Australia
    Join Date
    12th April 2015
    Location
    Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    257
    Thanks
    2,992
    Thanked 1,605 Times in 252 Posts
    This is quite a timely topic for me, as over the past 2 weeks I've just watched 2 documentaries on tv featuring Sarah and her work. The first was in Egypt & the second was of her research exploring buildings built by the Romans.

    I found the first documentary on Egypt's Lost Cities on Youtube for anyone interested in seeing her work in more detail.

  18. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to RealityCreation For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (25th March 2016), bsbray (25th March 2016), Dreamtimer (25th March 2016), Joanna (25th March 2016)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •