Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Proof that history is wrong.

  1. #1
    Retired Member
    Join Date
    13th September 2013
    Location
    Rockies Foothills
    Posts
    4,982
    Thanks
    9,075
    Thanked 18,116 Times in 3,777 Posts

    Proof that history is wrong.

    This is a good one...

    Published on Apr 28, 2016
    According to geologists, the slow process of petrification dates back hundreds of millions of years.
    This has led several ufologists and ancient astronaut theorists to a quick deduction of the context of the incredible discovery
    leading them to assume not only that there was a human civilization before the historical process of petrification in Texas,
    but that this ancient civilization already possessed the necessary technology for the fabrication of a hammer with modern features.

    OOPARTS. What other archaeological finds prove that our recorded history is wrong?



  2. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to jimmer For This Useful Post:

    Aianawa (29th April 2016), Aragorn (29th April 2016), boja (30th April 2016), bsbray (29th April 2016), Dreamtimer (29th April 2016), Elen (29th April 2016), Frances (29th April 2016), Joanna (3rd May 2016), Juniper (29th April 2016), modwiz (29th April 2016), sandancer (10th May 2016), The One (29th April 2016)

  3. #2
    Retired Member Canada
    Join Date
    12th September 2013
    Location
    summer time view from office window
    Posts
    345
    Thanks
    946
    Thanked 1,958 Times in 344 Posts
    The key words in this report are "According to Geologists ..."

    Geologists do not understand Earth's stratification layers. Like a lot of science taught in Universities, the principles are rubbish. There is no evidence for the standard geological time-scale. It took me a lot of years of reading good science based on the evidence, rather based on the "principles" being taught, to finally have to admit that what I had been taught, and believed, was false. Tesla proved that the principles of electricity being taught to engineers are all wrong in terms of the number of vectors, Royal Rife proved that the principles of disease are not accurate in medicine, and getting back to geology:

    The principles of Continental Drift have been proven wrong time and again by the evidence: Coral on top of mountains, superposition principle fails, limestone mountains slowly pushed up by continental drift -rubbish.

    Catastrophes are what shaped our planet when electromagnetics forces pulled the continents, suddenly lifting the strata up into mountains. I am talking about catastrophes such as the sinking of Atlantis, exploding planets in our solar system, an expanding and contracting Earth, earthquakes and volcanoes, comets and asteroids. The strata were not laid down in the simple manner geologists would like to believe. Hence the inaccurate dating techniques.

    Most people already know about the problems with Carbon -14 dating when it comes to big numbers in terms of greater than 10,000 years.

    A belief in continental drift is the main problem with geological dating. Humans have not been on Earth for nearly as long as these geologist are claiming. This is not to suggest that archaeologist are any better with their musings, theories and claimed facts based on their own imaginations.
    Last edited by Herbert, 29th April 2016 at 17:45.

  4. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Herbert For This Useful Post:

    Aianawa (29th April 2016), Aragorn (29th April 2016), bsbray (29th April 2016), Dreamtimer (29th April 2016), Elen (29th April 2016), Frances (29th April 2016), jimmer (29th April 2016), The One (29th April 2016)

  5. #3
    (account terminated) United States
    Join Date
    16th January 2015
    Location
    Au dela
    Posts
    2,901
    Thanks
    17,558
    Thanked 12,648 Times in 2,895 Posts
    I agree that geologists have gotten a lot of things wrong, and this is even established to some degree already in their own academic journals. For example it's already been proven by a university study (I think carried out by Colorado State University but I may be wrong) that stratification can occur in mud when it's settling down and give the appearance of several layers that are all exactly the same age, not progressively older as geologists often argue.

    I have seen gatekeepers find all kinds of ways to plug their ears and cover their eyes on these kinds of artifacts. Pretty much any crazy excuse you can imagine, they have come up with for these kinds of artifacts. But very rarely will they ever consider that (1) the way they date things is wildly inaccurate, and (2) their idea of human history is wildly inaccurate.

    In the 1700's it was still widely accepted that the Earth was only a few thousand years old. We are correcting our understand of the past slowly but surely, and we can't ignore OOPArts.

  6. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to bsbray For This Useful Post:

    Aianawa (29th April 2016), Aragorn (29th April 2016), Dreamtimer (29th April 2016), Elen (29th April 2016), Frances (29th April 2016), jimmer (29th April 2016), modwiz (29th April 2016), The One (29th April 2016)

  7. #4
    Retired Member
    Join Date
    13th September 2013
    Location
    Rockies Foothills
    Posts
    4,982
    Thanks
    9,075
    Thanked 18,116 Times in 3,777 Posts
    here's a real head scratcher: the 2 million year old human figurine.


  8. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to jimmer For This Useful Post:

    bsbray (2nd May 2016), Dreamtimer (2nd May 2016), Elen (2nd May 2016), modwiz (24th May 2016)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •