25th April 2016, 13:53
Perhaps starting a product line would be a good way to educate the public about all of this.
A mask that can filter out these particles can be worn during the day.
- Different styles: darth vader, storm trooper, classic WWII... or elegance versions.
- Features a nano-filter that blocks harmful nano particles that attack the lungs.
- Enhance your SAT scores today by breathing healthily. Ask about enhancing O2 flow via the oxygen module, sold separately as a kit containing a portable O2 tank, pressure regulator and tubing to plumb energizing O2 directly into your mask.
An interesting complementary product might be an HVAC add-on that filters nano-particles from outside air as well as maintains certain levels of O2 inside a building.
All this O2 stuff is related to a different problem: Oxygen depletion.
Last edited by lcam88, 25th April 2016 at 14:20.
The Following User Says Thank You to lcam88 For This Useful Post:
25th April 2016, 15:37
Thing is the question people should be asking is what makes bad air..
Originally posted by Dreamtimer
They say it is Nitrogen Dioxide, Nitric Oxides, "particulates", and Ozone.. that's what people are told makes up a bad air day, full of smog.. (China has massive issues with "smog")..
What is hidden is the nano-particle emission which comes from ALL burning.. like campfires, forest fires, coal fired and gas fired power plants...from flaring from oil and gas wells... from exhaust emission right at the point where the exhaust touches the atmosphere.. that is then from all internal combustion powered vehicles - lawn mowers, leaf blowers, small airplanes and large, jet engines..
When conditions are right, the emissions become visible.. A close to home visibility reaction is when water in exhaust will nucleate (particles clump together) and visible emission is seen.. the carbon particles will nucleate too, becoming visible as micro-soot..
Nano-chemistry is not like normal chemistry, reactions happen, charges transfer, and the nano-particle can get INTO areas where larger chemical molecules can't.
Fugitive emission is what it is called, when the emissions from ground up tires for instance continue to emit smells.. When particles get big enough to start to become visible, the cell penetrating toxicity diminishes due to them not being able to get-in.. But for sulfur particles for instance, such can combine with air (the oxygen) and create SO2 (sulfur dioxide), which then can combine with water, and form Sulfuric Acid, or one particular type of acid rain. Sulfur dioxide can combine with water in the lung and that is awfully corrosive..
Vehicles can emit nitrogen nano-particles, and that can lead to nitric acid (another form of corrosive acid rain).. And it again, at the smallest sized particles happen to get into the cells at the nano-stage size, where at that size makes it in past all barriers.
We sense the change when it hits us with nano-particle overload.. Some used to call it, the "positive ion charge" is what makes people crazy agitated and wanting to bite anyone's head off who points out their reactivity for instance. When the positive ions are noticed, the nano-sized particles have clumped (nucleated) into much larger particles, whilst the damage has been done by the smallest sizes.. Turning on the negative ionizer treats the larger particles, not the smallest... so damage ends up happening and people don't feel relieved by the negative ionizer..
I believe strongly that the contrail to chemtrail drama was about misdirection, put out by industry and picked up by supporters who are either ignorant on the issue of nano-particle fugitive emission (as described above), so that the industries don't get massively sued for the ultra-trillions of dollars in damages resultant from the industry which uses internal combustion engines..
Nano-particle can influence the weather also (weatherwars for instance).
The tires are a perfect way to disperse toxins in the air by a foreign power.. no exotic "spraying" needed, and a perfect thing to be hidden from the people by making them focus on "chemtrails", something which can be scarey, due to being an unknown, like. It's social media manipulation to hide surface pollution and the causes of it.
Flaring generates nano-particles which nucleate into assorted sizes of toxins which some can be visible, some not - those particles travel around the world.
Volcanic emission also.. Every time a volcano lites up all of that emission is radiated.. the larger particles are seen, the nano-particles are not.. It is not just the volcanic ash to be dealt with..
When I hear the "chemtrail" drama, I understand the behind the scenes which people are being distracted from. I will say my peace and then watch it be covered up by the industry apologists, and watch the industry NEVER ever change, but put more toxic nano-emission into the air, and real potential for correction and legislation that can stop it be blocked, while branded as the "chemtrail lunatic fringe's" non-science. Nano-particle emission from burning, from high temperature combustion, from other sources of generation is the issue.. That being covered up is tragic, that being deviated from recognizing it is criminal IMHO.
my references and threads:
Last edited by Bob, 25th April 2016 at 16:42.
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Bob For This Useful Post:
Dreamtimer (25th April 2016), Joanna (26th April 2016), lcam88 (27th April 2016), Olaf (25th April 2016)
26th April 2016, 22:49