|
-
18th April 2016, 09:28
#31
From Sam: Can't we see what we are doing?
We have an anomalous experience and seek to explain it. We then interpret our experiences. My guess is that more often than not, our interpretations are assisted by the information we have come across that previously and thus we have that lovely "a-ha" moment where we think we have "connected some dot." This then leads us to form conclusions and eventually our conclusions begin to suggest the formation of a paradigm. Note that sometimes we can have anomalous experiences where later... sometimes years later, we run across information that suddenly connects those crucial dots and finally explains it all! (This is what happened with me with Shane tFR and is what made me so vulnerable).
And why we do this is because we like to know.
We like the security of knowing.
Sam, from what you've said of The Mothman Prophecies, the 'supernatural occurrences' being described are anecdotal? What I would ask, not having read the book or having any inclination to do so, is whether there is any substantiating evidence, such as photographs or film...and particularly, if so, whether there is substantiating evidence from more than one witness, and better still, more than one witness at the same time and/or location with material proof?
Because if not, it's just hearsay - like Corey Goode's writings - with nothing more than unsubstantiated stories to suggest what its origin is ie; whether it could be a multiple hallucination, whether it is genuinely 'supernatural' beings or entities of some kind, whether these images (and humming sounds, which sparks suspicions for me) could have been technologically generated, or generated by a highly trained occult, malevolent mind/s, human or otherwise, whether the mothman, blue orbs, and animal mutilations are connected, if true, in a way that they are all coming from the same source, or from multiple sources, and if so, whether they are connected in intent and manifestation of 'phenomena', or disconnected.
Secondly, where you speak for the collective 'we', when it comes to leaping to (potentially shaky) conclusions when dots appear to connect in the desire to interpret and know what certain anomalous experiences are, this assumes that for everyone, supernatural, paranormal, interdimensional and/or extraterrestrial experiences are 'anomalies'.
That assumption doesn't work for me, or folk like me, who have experienced/continue to experience what others would call 'anomalous events' or happenings as part of our everyday life ie; as our normal. An anomaly means something different, unusual, unclassifiable...but you know, if you see orbs often, and/or other interdimensional phenomena, including starships (UFO is another misnomer, if you have contact - they're hardly 'unidentified') and so on regularly enough that they are a part of your normal life, then what is more the anomaly?
To me, as I've experienced life since childhood, the third dimensional 'reality' is more ephemeral, transient and 'anomalous' than life in say, fifth dimension or ninth dimension (for want of a better way of expressing it in 3D words)...but nonetheless, it touches my heart deeply.
And perhaps because of experiencing this lifetime as interdimensional and multidimensional, and as loving, first and foremost, then on the whole, BEing is more 'natural' and more enjoyable, actually, than attachment to the hunt to know, always looking out there in someone else's 'data' for what IS 'the truth'...which does have fear/insecurity at its base...
About CG, just plain logic, without the use of subtle senses, could tell anyone there's something awry with his Blue Avians, on a number of counts. One being that if they were true benevolent higher dimensional beings aligned with Love and Unity Consciousness, they wouldn't preach duality in their 'message'. They'd be saying, 'be in service to Love, to Source' rather than be in 'service to others' and not to yourself. Any entity that encourages people to keep their vision dualized - Service to Self versus Service to Others - is not in unity consciousness. Is that so hard to see?
Same with the Law of One that DW refers to a lot, and in relation to CG's info: The so-called 'Ra' beings channeled in that material state that Will is the first distortion from Source, and Love is the second distortion from Source...and I would say, what manner of being would feel will and love as distortions? Even to use that word about love, says something, deeply...at least to me...that the channeler is compromised, or has a lot of ego filtering going on, or that the entities being channeled are not what they say they are, or that it's all made up etc.
Your focus is on the dollars & fame angle of the 'ET/Disclosure industry', and my perception is of an agenda to soak both the alternative and mainstream 'views' in false, fear-based and disinfo (part truths/part distortions) so that folk can't see the wood for the trees, and screen out genuine goodwill ETs and other beings - and those who have substantiated contact with them - under the blanket of noise...
So, why would people acquiesce to, and play into, this scenario? And what would it take for them to move on from doing that?
-
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Joanna For This Useful Post:
Aianawa (18th April 2016), Aragorn (18th April 2016), Cearna (19th April 2016), donk (18th April 2016), Dreamtimer (18th April 2016), Elen (18th April 2016), sandy (19th April 2016), The One (18th April 2016)
-
18th April 2016, 14:21
#32