Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvbeQermP6s
Very interesting, covers the AI, cult compartmentalization, expanded consciousness and more...
*
Here is a Piratepad if anyone wanted to transcribe any notes:
http://piratepad.net/JxxoJYvoNh
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvbeQermP6s
Very interesting, covers the AI, cult compartmentalization, expanded consciousness and more...
*
Here is a Piratepad if anyone wanted to transcribe any notes:
http://piratepad.net/JxxoJYvoNh
One of the things I really appreciate from this conversation is the candidness re A.I. being inorganic as a parallel to organic. I view A.I. as not being something that actually needs to be destroyed but rather needs to be understood, mastered, and ultimately transformed. The million dollar question being: mastered and transformed according to what motive. Motive, or Will, being the underlying theme, in my understanding, that is vital for each of us to uniquely and determinedly decide upon and then apply with forceful conviction e.g. Life and expansion for the betterment of ALL, or a few!
I see our Sovereign Wholeness descending being the trump card in this version of reality. When we are struggling with our instruments in being able to create according to our genuine heart directive it would be logical to seek assistance, but we are socially conditioned to believe that great wisdom and help must be sought from outside ourselves and that we are ultimately powerless instruments in the grand scheme of things. When we can individually de-program this belief system and subsequently remember/reconnect with our unique, immortal Sovereign Wholeness and in doing so activate its governing abilities to re-program our human lives to live according to its wisdom and its "out of the box" creativity, then collectively, global transformation is inevitable. This to me is ultimately where the power for change resides.
The following artistic rendition really captures the essence of oneself descending into oneself, as well as demonstrating not only the immunity and power that our Sovereign Wholeness represents, but how it can enter and transform our A.I. programmed reality.
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...0948f84985.jpg
(Incidently the above image can bear great resemblances to how we are coming to understand our true selves more and more, for example, borrowing references from towards the end of the linked discussion : balancing and blending daily life awareness with expanded consciousness awareness; Clark Kent and Superman being one but able to demonstrate genuinely as two; walking in both worlds; (organic) nature overriding programmed (inorganic) nature, etc.)
N.B. The wings are an interesting symbolism on the head/brain/mind region so I thought it may be useful to include the translation of the wings from the artist:
{Bit of help please Mods if you can in shrinking the above image. Many thanks. Update: Thanks Aragorn for PM's re possible solutions to the image size problem and hopefully will be worked out soon.}The term WingMakers is encoded: “wing” is derived from the term wind or blow. It is the active force of setting new states into motion. “Makers” is the plurality of the co-creators - that being the collective essence of humanity. Thus, WingMakers means that from the collective essence of humanity new states of consciousness come into being. This is the meaning of the term WingMakers, and it confers to humanity a new identity.
[Extract from Collected Works of the Wingmakers by James Mahu]
Last edited by Gemma, 4th October 2015 at 03:30.
I've always been impressed with how Investigative Journalist/Writer Jon Rappoport can compress complex and profound into simple articles. Thought I would share this one here as, imo, it links nicely with discussions on imagination that are shared in the Vid.
Beyond an artificial world
by Jon Rappoport
October 3, 2015
Futurists are inclined to predict a world in which AI (artificial intelligence) will take over a major portion of what is now human activity.
In a matter of decades, for example, they say one computer will have more capacity than all the human brains on the planet put together.
Then, the prediction goes, AI will be virtually human, or more than human.
However, just because AI has greater computational skills than any person or group of persons, where is the quality that makes it human?
In order to answer that, you have to perform a little trick. You have to say that humans are really only high-class machines. [My comment: We may have been conditioned to behave like a machine but this doesn't definitively categorize us as one.]
Many pundits have no difficulty with this, because they see humans as problem solvers, period. And that’s what a machine is.
It’s just like the genes-cause-everything hypothesis. Since all existence is assumed to take place on a material level, on a physical level, it’s only a matter of time until we figure out which genes create which human qualities. Eventually, we’ll have a complete map.
Then, if we want to change humans, we just tinker with the genes.
It turns out that this style of reasoning can be used to justify external control of Earth’s population. The assumption is: we are already living in a closed system of cause and effect, so that system IS controlling all human behavior. Gene tinkering and handing over immense decision-power to advanced computers is nothing more than re-arranging the closed system. It was closed and it is closed and it will be closed. No problem.
Right now, the system appears to dictate wars and pain and suffering, so won’t it be much better when the gene-reconfiguration and the computers eliminate that aspect of things?
Believe me, many scientists are thinking along these lines, and they are serious about their goals.
They consider themselves humanitarians.
I bring all this up, because there is really only one way to defeat this kind of thinking.
You need to acknowledge that a prime aspect of existence is non-material.
Non-material means: without a rigid cause-and-effect structure.
To put it another and better way, the individual human being has freedom, and he also has imagination and creative power. These qualities are not material or physical in nature, they are not generated by the brain or by genes or by computational problem-solving ability.
In all societies, past and present, those people who agree that these non-physical capacities are quite real explain them by opting for religion, for religious stories, for cosmologies promoted by one kind of church or another.
Only a tiny number of people state that such non-material qualities and abilities are inherent in the human being and need no explanation or embroidery.
You could say the pendulum has swung drastically from one side to the other. First we had superstitions everywhere and no technology, and now we have streamlined science that purports to explain all of existence, but can’t.
Believe me, this inability to put all life under the umbrella of science is frustrating to obsessed rationalists. They refuse to allow the possibility that imagination and freedom are outside the boundaries of physical cause-and-effect…and if they have to, they will try to prove their position by imposing one system after another on humans, in order to wipe out the freedom they claim doesn’t exist in the first place.
One such strategy involves using computers to generate art and poetry. The thinking is, if we can’t tell the difference between what a computer and a human produce, why do we need human art—and more importantly, why do we need to claim that human imagination and creative power are unique? They are just sub-categories of computational skills, minor tricks, and we shouldn’t worry our pretty little heads about it…
In every technological society, power is thought of as physical, and the greatest power is produced by machines. To say that human power is ultimately a non-material capacity, and is equal to or greater than what a machine can do…this is considered the height of absurdity.
But if we surrender to that view, we deal away the future to systems that will put the squeeze on the essence of what a human is.
There are thousands, perhaps millions of artists all over the world who’ve glimpsed, or know deeply, what I’m talking about in this article. Their problem, if they have one, stems from believing they have to be psychological underdogs, in order to create their art. This is a cultural artifact, this belief, and it can be cast aside by nakedly comprehending the unlimited power of imagination they possess.
Imagination creates reality.
Jon Rappoport
Last edited by Gemma, 4th October 2015 at 03:31.
Thanks for that quote. It covers what Im trying to do right now. I realized it's easier to create/reprogram the matrix from the deeper soul...When we can individually de-program this belief system and subsequently remember/reconnect with our unique, immortal Sovereign Wholeness and in doing so activate its governing abilities to re-program our human lives to live according to its wisdom and its "out of the box" creativity, then collectively, global transformation is inevitable. This to me is ultimately where the power for change resides.
I don't have much time to discuss things any more, but I agree with Gemma that Descension is an important part of the process. Maybe we have to increase our soul presence here. So the progression is cycling between ascencion and decenscion, many times a day.I see our Sovereign Wholeness descending being the trump card in this version of reality. When we are struggling with our instruments in being able to create according to our genuine heart directive it would be logical to seek assistance, but we are socially conditioned to believe that great wisdom and help must be sought from outside ourselves and that we are ultimately powerless instruments in the grand scheme of things. When we can individually de-program this belief system and subsequently remember/reconnect with our unique, immortal Sovereign Wholeness and in doing so activate its governing abilities to re-program our human lives to live according to its wisdom and its "out of the box" creativity, then collectively, global transformation is inevitable. This to me is ultimately where the power for change resides.