5th April 2016, 20:30
Top Scientists Weigh In On Whether We All Live In A Hologram
Link to livestream of debate http://www.amnh.org/2016-asimov-debate
Our universe certainly seems real, but in recent years, a growing number of scientists have begun to wonder if it’s all just a sophisticated simulation. Are we and everything around us nothing more than points of data in some sort of cosmic hologram?
A group of celebrated scientists, including Neil deGrasse Tyson, will sit down on Tuesday for a serious discussion of what may sound more like a sci-fi movie plot than reality.
The event at New York City’s American Museum of Natural History starts at 7 p.m. Eastern time. You can watch it live in the video above.
Tyson will be joined by Lisa Randall, a theoretical physicist at Harvard University; Max Tegmark, a cosmologist at Massachusetts Institute of Technology; David Chalmers, a professor of philosophy at New York University; Zohreh Davoudi, a theoretical physicist at MIT; and James Gates, a theoretical physicist at the University of Maryland.
The event is part of the museum’s Isaac Asimov Memorial Debate series, which is held each year to commemorate the life of the iconic science fiction author.
It promises to be a lively discussion — or maybe it will just seem that way
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to lift the veil For This Useful Post:
Dreamtimer (5th April 2016), Joanna (6th April 2016), pointessa (20th April 2016), Sammy (16th April 2016)
6th April 2016, 11:20
Well, that would depend on what your prime sense/perception of value is within the construct. If your value is Life, integrity of life - the integrity and inherent worth of the energy itself that is changing its form representations within the simulation (which could indeed be vastly multi-layered), valuing that energy within your form and all form appearances - then you would be inclined to prefer and be drawn toward that which supports the integrity of life, no matter what its 'form appearances'....rather than that which depletes or damages it, such as GM mono-crops that are limiting biodiversity, or preferring a natural nutritious sweetener like stevia rather than a synthetic sweetener like aspartame, that is potentially carcinogenic, among other things....
Originally posted by lcam88
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Joanna For This Useful Post:
lcam88 (6th April 2016), pointessa (20th April 2016), Sammy (16th April 2016)
6th April 2016, 11:50