Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 48 of 48

Thread: The French Revolution: The Reign Of Terror

  1. #46
    Retired Member UK
    Join Date
    12th September 2013
    Location
    UK.
    Posts
    1,815
    Thanks
    19,274
    Thanked 6,600 Times in 1,366 Posts

    Memoirs Of Madame Tussaud : Witness To The French Revolution



    Louis XVI and family being returned to Paris after their failed escape.

    Source:- https://archive.org/stream/11499676....ge/n7/mode/2up

    M. Curtius was a man of acute penetration, and knowing exactly the position of affairs, he was enabled to calculate what must be the inevitable issue whenever the trial of strength should be brought to the dreaded ordeal which he foresaw was rapidly approaching. Therefore, for his own preservation and that of his family and property, he adhered in appearance to that party whom he knew must prevail ; although he always declared to Madame Tussaud and her mother, that he was at heart a royalist, but he observed, if he pro- claimed himself such, it would not serve the king an iota nor retard for an instant the thunder- bolt which threatened all the royal family with annihilation ; even if he remained neutral, M.Curtius assured his family, he should only ensure their destruction whenever the republican party obtained the ascendancy.

    This was the explanation Madame Tussaud received from her uncle when accounting for the number of visitors who frequented his house whose politics were of the most fanatical description, and whose theories concerning the different forms of government all tended to the subversion of monarchy. Amongst the rest, the Duke of Orleans was a most frequent visitor, and was regarded by Madame Tussaud almost with detestation, as were many of his satellites, by whom he was constantly surrounded ; and although these revolutionary enthusiasts seldom entered to any great extent on political subjects during dinner, and the ladies retired immediately after, yet enough was heard to convince Madame Tussaud that a terrific storm was gathering, and to cause her to tremble for its consequences.

    Though the commissioners delegated to inquire into the affair of the king's departure acquitted him of any evil intentions towards his country, the mob without, and the Jacobin club, were determined to denounce him, and this led to repeated disturbances in the streets of Paris, which often terminated in bloodshed. Robespierre now made his appearance on the stage in support of republicanism ; but Danton and Camille Desmoulins were the most daring orators of the mob. Madame Tussaud remembered the latter, quite at the commencement of the Revolution in 1780, liaranguing the people in the Palais Royal mounted upon a table with a brace of pistols in his hand, shouting, "To arms !" He now plucked a leaf from a tree, with which he formed a cockade, and exhorted the people to follow his example, that it might form a bond of union in the sacred cause of contending for their liberties.

    The trees were soon stripped of their leaves ; and as Camille Desmoulins remained the mouthpiece of the mob, and was by profession a lawyer, he was called the " Attorney-General of the Lamp-post," having caused and presided over several of these summary executions by the mob. He was born at Guise in Picardy, and was the son of a lieutenant-general. He first appeared before the public at the bar pleading against his father, whom he wished to compel to give an increase of allowance to his unnatural son, though he was aware that his parent's circumstances were too limited to render such an increase possible. He subsequently became secretary to Danton, and was a most active agent in promoting every bad purpose suggested by his employer.

    At length the National Assembly arrived at the termination of its sittings. The constitution was completed and presented by sixty members to the king, by whom it was accepted, and immediately he was restored to an appearance of freedom ; that is to say, the guard under which Louis had been kept in a state of surveillance, was removed, and on his declaration of his acceptance of the constitution, there was a feeling of satisfaction in Paris, whilst La Fayette, taking advantage of so auspicious a moment, proposed a general amnesty, which should cast, as it were, a veil of oblivion upon all acts associated with the revolution. This proposition was carried and proclaimed amid shouts of applause, which was followed by throwing open all the prisons, and this was hailed by shouts of approbation from all quarters of the capital, and echoed from the remotest provinces of France.

    But Louis scarcely understood the new constitution or the powers it gave to the Legislative Assembly. he had to suffer severe humiliations; first, the terms " majesty " and " sire " were to be omitted ; secondly, when the king entered the Assembly the members remained sitting, and one republican, more bold than the rest, ventured to come into his presence without taking off his hat. All this was gall and wormwood to Louis, who sobbingly told the queen the insults to which he had been subject at the first meeting of the Assembly. She endeavoured to console him, but the wound was not to be healed.

    The king endeavoured to keep up as much dignity as possible, and the subject which gave most umbrage to the people was that Louis would not give up his veto ; which meant,of course, that he should have the privilege of annulling any decree of the Legislative Assembly if he should think it wise to do so. But the enemies of the king represented the veto in so obnoxious a light, that many absolutely thought that within it centred all their grievances, and, as a term of reprobation, the mob called his Majesty " Monsieur Veto." general was this designation, that many thought it was his real name. Madame Tussaud remembers a person asking her uncle the question, who expressed the deepest astonishment when told that the king's name was Capet.

    At the commencement of the year 1792 every- thing was fast tending to republicanism. The masses wore the bonnet rouge as the symbol of liberty. The dress of the sansculottes was also very general. Madame Tussaud remembers once to have seen the Duke of Orleans clad in that singular costume. It consisted of a short jacket, pantaloons, and a round hat, with a handkerchief worn sailor fashion loose round the neck, with the ends long and hanging down, the shirt-collar seen above, the hair cut short, without powder, a la Titus, and shoes tied with strings. This dress at that period was in every respect remarkable, for
    it consisted of the very reverse of the prevailing fashion.



    The hair short, without powder, a la Titus.

    Marat at this time published a paper of a most malicious character, and a decree had been issued against him for having recommended murder. " The outrageous conduct of this demon," says Madame Tussaud, " had more than once obliged him to remain in concealment, and having been a visitor of my uncle's, he came one Saturday night and requested an asylum, having in his hand a carpet-bag containing what few clothes and linen he required, and he remained with us until the following Saturday. Thus was I in the same house with Marat a whole week, the most ferocious monster that the revolution produced.

    He was very short, of middle height, with very small arms, one of which was feeble from natural defect, and he appeared lame. His complexion was sallow, of a greenish hue, his eyes dark and piercing, his hair wild and raven black, his countenance had a fierce
    aspect, he was slovenly in his dress, and even dirty in his person, his manner was abrupt, coarse, and rude. He used to write almost the whole day in a corner by the aid of a little lamp, and on one occasion he came to me, gave me a tap upon the shoulder with such roughness as caused me to shudder, saying, ' There, mademoiselle, it is not for ourselves that I and my fellow-labourers are working, but it is for you, and your children, and your children's children. As to ourselves, perhaps we shall not live to enjoy the fruits of our exertions,' adding that ' all the aristocrats must be killed.' He made a calculation how many persons could be destroyed in one day, and decided that the number might amount to 260,000.

    The next Saturday, about dusk, he took his leave of us, telling me that I was a very good child, and thanking us for the asylum we had afforded him. I never saw him again until one day two gens d'amies came for me to go to the house of Marat, just after he had been killed by Charlotte Corday, for the purpose of taking a cast of his face. He was still warm, and his bleeding body and the cadaverous aspect of his almost diabolical features presented a picture replete with horror, and I performed my task under the most painful sensations."



    Charlotte Corday & the murder of Murat

    Charlotte Corday, Madame Tussaud tells us, was an heroic girl. She travelled alone from Normandy to Paris, determined to rid the country of a monster. When she arrived in the capital she was not quite resolved which should be her victim.
    Robespierre and Danton were nearly as odious to her mind as Marat, but the latter and his atrocities were more known in the provinces, particularly in the struggle which had taken place in the suppression of the insurrection in Calvados, where the cruel effects of his suggestions had been most severely felt. Her first attempt to see Marat proved unsuccessful ; but on the second, though his housekeeper, a young woman, refused to admit her, yet Marat, who was in his bath, hearing the voice of Charlotte Corday, and having had a letter from her stating that she had intelligence of importance to communicate, ordered that she should be admitted. She first amused him with the account of the deputies at Caen, when Marat said, " They shall all go to the guillotine." " To the guillotine ? " she exclaimed ; and as he caught up a pencil to write the names of the offenders, Charlotte Corday plunged a knife into his heart.

    "Help, my dear!" he cried, and his housekeeper obeyed the call, and a man who was near rushed in and knocked down the avenger of her country with a chair, whilst the woman attendant trampled upon her. A crowd was instantly attracted to the spot by the uproar, when Charlotte Corday rose and looked around her in a composed and dignified manner. Her beauty, her courage, and her calm demeanour interested the authorities, and they conducted her to prison, protecting her from insult.

    After taking the cast of the murdered man's features, Madame Tussaud visited Charlotte Corday in the Conciergerie Prison, and found her a most interesting personage. She was tall and well proportioned ; her countenance had something noble in it ; her complexion was remarkably clear, and her manners extremely pleasing ; her mind was perhaps rather of a masculine character ; fond of history, she had made it her study, and naturally became deeply interested in the politics of her country. She was a great admirer of pure republican principles, and thought that the Girondins adopted her views. To this party she became enthusiastically attached, and imbibed a proportionate detestation of the Mountain party; hence the success of that resolution which brought her to the scaffold.

    She conversed with Madame Tussaud cheerfully. During the trial she observed the same self-possession, and avowed everything without reserve. When conveyed to the scaffold some few of the rabble abused her, but far more pitied and admired her, and many women shed tears as she passed. A smile of happiness played upon her features on her way to execution, and when the last preparations were being performed, as the handkerchief was withdrawn, and discovered her bosom, the blush of modesty suffused her cheek, but she never once displayed the slightest emotion of fear. As soon as her head was severed the cowardly executioner held it up and buffeted it, an action which was witnessed by the people with shuddering. The mutilated head was conveyed to the Madeleine and a cast of it was taken by Madame Tussaud.

    She had been affianced to Major Belsance, a very handsome young man, who was in the royal guards, and assassinated in one of the popular commotions in 1789. She wrote a letter to her father, begging pardon for what she had done, and stating that she believed it to be her duty, bidding him remember that Corneille had said that "the crime, not the scaffold, constitutes the shame".
    Frances.


    To be continued....
    Last edited by Frances, 6th February 2016 at 14:43.

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Frances For This Useful Post:

    Aianawa (6th February 2016), BabaRa (16th February 2016), bsbray (5th February 2016), Elen (17th February 2016)

  3. #47
    (account terminated) United States
    Join Date
    16th January 2015
    Location
    Au dela
    Posts
    2,901
    Thanks
    17,558
    Thanked 12,648 Times in 2,895 Posts
    Since we've already been reading about aspects of the revolution not specifically confined to the Reign of Terror, I'll throw in some research I've been doing into the illegal literature leading up to 1789.

    These are books that were banned by French officials because they either talked trash about the king, the clergy (Catholic Church and even attacking the basic principles of Christianity itself), the nobility, or for violating "common morality" (ie, pornographic works, which were often also graphically political in nature...).

    The illegal book trade in 18th-century France was big business and the state could not suppress it effectively. Works like Diderot's massive Encyclopedia and Rousseau's Social Contract (which were both illegal in France) are often cited as ideological influences upon the revolution, but they're just the tip of the iceberg. In fact, Diderot's many-volumed Encyclopedia was too expensive for anyone but the wealthy to order. The majority of literate France was feeding its imagination with obscene satires, heretical attacks on the church which have scarcely been surpassed even today, and a diverse variety of other offensive literature that, in the end, must have accomplished its fair share in the beheading of King Louis XVI, his wife, and countless others.


    Robert Darnton has done more research into the illegal book trade leading up to the revolution than anyone else, using original catalogues and other period documents from the Société typographique de Neuchâtel in Switzerland, which was a major smuggler of illegal works into France. Out of records for 28,000 copies of illegal works, spanning 720 separate titles, about 32% were criticisms on the Catholic Church or religion, 29% were political, 22% philosophical, 14% were pornographic, and the rest dealt with occultism, freemasonry and other varied subjects.

    The pornographic works were usually attacks on the church or monarchy as well. King Louis was mocked for being unable to produce a male heir, while fictional stories about Marie Antoinette's wild orgies were circulating all over France. European monarchs are supposed to have been appointed by God to rule over their people. You can imagine, it would be very hard for a population to take that idea seriously when they are reading this kind of literature, along with books arguing how all three of the Abrahamic religions are built on lies and nonsense in the first place (such as an infamous but popular work titled The Three Impostors, referring to Moses, Jesus and Mohammed). This kind of literature only seems to have exploded in the first time in the 18th century, with the spread of the printing press and popular literature with free market ideas.

    Louis-Sébastien Mercier (author of what appears to have been by far the illegal best-seller of the time, called The Year 2440, or L'An Deux Mille Quatre Cent Quarante, a novel about a future utopia), in Le Tableau de Paris, detailed “the success that obscene publications and engravings enjoyed” during this period, as summarized by Jean Marie Goulemot:

    They were sold on thoroughfares and places where prostitutes plied their trade, such as the Palais Royal, the entry to the Tuileries [the former royal palace], the Opéra, and even more outrageously in the courtyard of the Hôtel de Soubise [property formerly owned by the Knights Templar prior to them being outlawed, then the site of a mansion for the marshall of the French military], and in the most popular and fashionable cafés. One of the main places in which these forbidden books were sold was Versailles [the royal palace and home of Louis XVI]: not only in the town, which had several private booksellers, but also in the château itself and in the park. An inspection carried out in 1749 revealed that there were erotic books everywhere, from the apartments of the highest nobility to the little room of a preacher's servant. On 14 March 1749 Lacasse Jean, a kitchen boy at the royal court, was taken to the Bastille on the authority of a lettre de cachet for having 'placed in the royal chapel at Versailles a complete edition of Le Portier des Chartreux'. He remained in the fortress until 1 October 1750. On 17 May it was the turn of Marcel de Gamaches, a master binder (released on 9 July), for having placed another copy of Le Portier des Chartreux in the château of Versailles.
    Forbidden book peddlers also set up “stalls at the annual fair in the park at Saint-Cloud, or found a place at the entry to the basilica at Saint-Denis, which as a religious foundation was exempt from the interference of the inspectors sent out by the directorate general of the book trade.” Sellers would even go door-to-door selling these books and placing orders for shipments from Switzerland and Holland.

    By 1740 arrests for erotic literature began to increase, though precise figures or even distinctions between pornographic writings, political satires and philosophical literature were not kept. But authorities had become aware of an “upsurge” in obscene literature and responded accordingly, and at this time we have early examples of heretical (Jansenist) material and erotic literature being printed side-by-side at some printers, which would seem to suggest that profit was more of a factor than a sense of moral obligation. Criticism of authorities, including “remarks against the person of the king,” were apparently also taking place already around this time period.

    In 1757, Robert-François Damiens unsuccessfully attempted to assassinate Louis XV, and was subsequently executed for it. Following this, though Jansenism was again suspected, inspectors are said to have mostly cracked down on publications which were “defamatory satires, remarks against the person of the king and the diffusion of banned books which, for this period, consisted mainly of philosophical or anti-religious work.”

    Despite the crack-down, obscene works that made a mockery of the king became more prominent soon after. Again quoting Goulemot, from Forbidden Texts:

    The turning-point seemed to come around 1765 with the arrest of Louis, Auguste and François Dieudé from Saint Lazare, for having made 'foul utterances against the king', a crime that earned them exile to Brittany. Under this heading of 'propos abominables', 'mauvais propos', which became more and more common, is probably hidden a language that is both pornographic and scatological in nature, and which is targeted at the person of the king, his policies and his mistresses, and which fed the nouvelles à la main ["news by hand"] – by which we should understand the sort of handwritten news-sheets, filled with unfounded rumours and the most injurious political denunciations. These circulated on an irregular basis in the streets of Paris, and there was no end to the arrests of those found distributing or writing them. […] With the start of the reign of Louis XVI, the production of these sorts of licentious satires continued unabated. In 1776 the majority of crimes relating to the book trade involved nouvelles à la main, whose style should be now be [sic] entirely familiar. In 1777 Jean-Baptiste-Jacques Lefebvre, a bookseller selling on the main staircase in the château of Versailles, was arrested on 19 September for having sold 'satires which contained insults and calumnies against the queen'. He was condemned to an exile of 30 leagues from the court on 17 April 1778. In the 1780s a new reason for imprisonment appeared: defamation, by which we should understand the writing and circulation of foul-mouthed and pornographic satires against the queen and ministers (Les Amours du Vizir Vergennes; Les Petits soupers de l'hôtel de Bouillon, among others). […] The le Collier affair encouraged the growth of the genre. In 1786 arrests became more and more frequent, both of hawkers and printers working underground, and against those booksellers distributing pamphlets attacking the honour of the queen and the virility of the king. If erotic works continued to be written, disseminated and read … then it was no longer the main target of the censors, either. Political satires, whether compounded by pornographic material or not, were of more immediate concerns to the powers that be. In these troubled times there were far more urgent matters requiring attention than the defence of standards of decency.

    In the meanwhile, it was true that pornography, and especially the erotic pamphlets devoted to the queen (such as the well-known Les Amours de Charlot et de Toinette, 1779), were a part of the general movement towards the desacralization of the monarchy. The queen was soiled, if only in the imagination of her subjects, mixed in with the most sordid foursomes, and offered up to the desires of those who read such satires. This if anything was a sign of the crisis facing the Ancien Régime. After the storm broke the freedom of the press was rapidly established. On 4 August 1789 the Constituant Assembly decided to abolish the system of privilèges, and thus the requirement for authorization of both authors and presses disappeared. On the 24th of the same month freedom of expression and thought were sanctioned by decree. There followed an explosion of pornographic and filthy pamphlets, both revolutionary and counter-revolutionary. […] The massacre, the erotic show, the heavy-handed denunciations, couched in the crudest terms imaginable, knew no bounds. The fashion lasted until the days of the Consulate, culminating in the publication of the infamous pamphlet, La France foutue ["F***** France"].
    At this point we can more clearly see the accomplishments of obscene literature in 18th century France. In previous periods, the monarch in France was seen as a sovereign who received his authority to rule from God, who was inviolable and demanded respect simply for existing. This image was irreparably damaged by the portrayals of the monarchy in 18th century France, particularly and increasingly in the years leading up to the revolution.

    This was also a period in French literary history where people from many diverse positions in society, from courtiers to “middlemen running between the booksellers,” virtually anyone who could read and write and had the opportunity were tempted for the first time to make a living or supplement their income through writing, even if only within the genre of pornography, though the fact that even philosophes such as Voltaire (Pucelle d'Orléans) and Diderot (Bijoux indiscrets) penned such work is a testament to its relative profitability.


    The aforementioned best-seller of the time, The Year 2440, tells the story of a man who falls asleep and wakes up over 600 years in the future, in a sort of utopian version of Paris, where, among other things, there is no longer any monarchy as the French would have recognized it, but apparently a republic with a “king” as an executive. It is within this fictional framework that the book makes social commentaries and expresses dangerous ideas about the France of its own time, that would have made the American founding fathers proud.

    Some excerpts from this immensely popular work of fiction (and remember the year first published -- 1770, almost 20 years before the revolution even began):

    For some states there is a stage which is unavoidable – a bloody and terrible stage, though it announces freedom to come. I speak of civil war. Here all the great men rise up, some attacking, others defending, liberty. Civil war gives free rein to the most hidden talents. Extraordinary citizens come forth and prove themselves as commanders of men. This is a horrible remedy! But after the long slumber of the state and its inhabitants, it becomes necessary.
    Liberty engenders miracles: it triumphs over nature, it makes crops sprout from rocks, it lends a cheerful air to the saddest regions, it enlightens simple shepherds and renders them more profound than the proud slaves of the most sophisticated courts. Other climates, which are the masterpiece and glory of creation, once they fall into slavery, exhibit only abandoned fields, pale faces, lowered glances which dare not look heavenward. Man! Choose, then, to be happy or miserable, if you are capable of choosing: fear tyranny, detest slavery, take up arms, live free or die.
    Why couldn't the French some day adopt certain republican forms? Who in this kingdom is unaware of the privileges of the nobility, based upon its origin and confirmed by several centuries of practice? As soon as the Third Estate emerged from its degradation, in the reign of John, it took its place in the national assemblies, and this proud and barbarian nobility accepted it, protesting, as belonging to the orders of the kingdom, even though the times were still rife with prejudices based on the administration of fiefs and the profession of arms. The French sense of honor – which is still a motivating principle and which is greater than our most venerable institutions – could perhaps one day become the soul of a republic, especially when the taste for philosophy, the knowledge of political laws, and the experience of so many misfortunes will have destroyed this superficiality and the indiscretion which contaminate those brilliant qualities that would make of the French the finest nation in the world, if they but knew how to plan, develop, and sustain their projects.
    Last edited by bsbray, 16th February 2016 at 08:43.

  4. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to bsbray For This Useful Post:

    Aianawa (16th February 2016), BabaRa (16th February 2016), Elen (17th February 2016), Frances (16th February 2016), modwiz (16th February 2016)

  5. #48
    Retired Member UK
    Join Date
    12th September 2013
    Location
    UK.
    Posts
    1,815
    Thanks
    19,274
    Thanked 6,600 Times in 1,366 Posts
    I enjoyed your article bsbray, it's a very fine, academic, and educational point of view.
    Frances.


    You should give your article a title bsbray, as its your own research.
    Last edited by Frances, 17th February 2016 at 09:20.

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Frances For This Useful Post:

    bsbray (17th February 2016), Elen (17th February 2016)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •