Turkish megaliths part 1 of 2, Göbekli Tepe, Ancient Advanced "Hittites" Tool Marks

[Elen]

The Russian team with another documentary which gives additional information.

Gobekli Tepe (Göbekli Tepe) and other ancient Turkish archaeological sites. Ancient advanced tools. The Peru connection. Hittites.

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y22YMN4goxk


A lot to ponder about, connecting more dots.

Elen

[modwiz]

It is interesting that what is now Turkey was Greater Armenia in those times. Hittites were probably some version of Armenian. Just don't tell the Turks.

I love what you have brought to this forum, Elen. I finally find something that interests me and have watched every video from New Earth. Thank you.

[bsbray]

I'm loving this New Earth channel too. I'm planning on ordering the first two volumes (there are seven altogether) of the revisionist historical texts from the series she cites all the time.

[Elen]

I think we're onto something, guys, you are so in tune with it, it makes my heart sing.

She said on the link with Anatoly Fomenko that part of the series is free and can be downloaded in PDF files in English. Here is the link to the files:

http://chronologia.org/en/index.html

I didn't post the video with Fomenko, because there was a lot of adds in it, but here it is anyway. A daring man with a lot of guts, but we deserve finding truth. We do.

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCj_WZIGftI


Elen

[Elen]

Here's part 2 of this interesting documentary. Enjoy. This one is showing seriously ancient structures.

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6boxoPVzv4


Elen

[Frances]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radi...hroud_of_Turin

Radiocarbon 14 dating of the Shroud of Turin.

The Shroud of Turin (Turin Shroud), a linen cloth that tradition associates with the crucifixion and burial of Jesus Christ, has undergone numerous scientific tests, the most notable of which is radiocarbon dating, in an attempt to determine the relic's authenticity. In 1988, scientists at three separate laboratories dated samples from the Shroud to a range of AD1260–1390, which coincides with the first appearance of the shroud in France in the 1350s and is much later than the burial of Jesus Christ.

If as the video suggests, Jesus was born in 1053, and crucified in 1086 A.D. Would the carbon dating of the shroud be more accurate?
Frances.

[Elen]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radi...hroud_of_Turin

Radiocarbon 14 dating of the Shroud of Turin.

The Shroud of Turin (Turin Shroud), a linen cloth that tradition associates with the crucifixion and burial of Jesus Christ, has undergone numerous scientific tests, the most notable of which is radiocarbon dating, in an attempt to determine the relic's authenticity. In 1988, scientists at three separate laboratories dated samples from the Shroud to a range of AD1260–1390, which coincides with the first appearance of the shroud in France in the 1350s and is much later than the burial of Jesus Christ.

If as the video suggests, Jesus was born in 1053, and crucified in 1086 A.D. Would the carbon dating of the shroud be more accurate?
Frances.

I hear you Frances, that seems like a real possibility, and personally I haven't studied astronomy to that extent. Fumenko has checked the Lunar-eclipses, and to be honest it sounds to me like a clock. Tick-tock-tick-tock-tick-tock. Suddenly the clock made a tick when it should be tock, and it woke him up.

Elen

[Frances]

Hello again, I don't think I projected my thoughts very well about The Shroud Of Turin.

I was thinking that the dates are more lined up, should it be the case that Jesus died 1086.
Nearer the carbon dating time of 1260 A.D.
Frances.

[Elen]

To be exact, I don't know Frances. Please look around for the answers. We all want to know.

Elen

[bsbray]

I was thinking that the dates are more lined up, should it be the case that Jesus died 1086.
Nearer the carbon dating time of 1260 A.D.

I know there are issues with carbon dating but I'm not an expert on all the ins and outs of it. I know that it was initially calibrated terribly by using ancient Egyptian artifacts that already had grossly inaccurate dates assigned to them that were refused by carbon dating calibrations later done using the rings of trees that were thousands of years old. Carbon dating has only been a science since about the 1950's. So we're talking about 65 years' experience with carbon dating, and yet it is used to date things thousands of years old, based on what we believe (based on various assumptions that may or may not be accurate) were the carbon 14 levels thousands of years ago.

The author that this Russian woman cites so much has a section in his first or second volume dedicated to criticisms of carbon dating. I saw it in a preview of a table of contents on Amazon. I'd be curious to read how he addresses carbon dating results when it comes to his works. Admittedly, even the "official" carbon dating tests often vary wildly and are discarded or ignored as somehow erroneous.

[Elen]

She lied to us, . There are 3 episodes all of a sudden. Here is the last one Angels and Dinosours of Göbekli Tepe. Some artifacts shown by Kerry Cassidy, analysed.

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JndnDzZBcSs


Elen