Time "control" research - Perhaps the most important technology of all

[Chester]

I have posted the following in my blog...

Peter Moon did a series of interviews with Dr. David Anderson.

These interviews can be heard by following this link.

Many interesting aspects of this research are discussed in these interviews.

Here are two quotes from the first interview that caught my attention.


“The gap between moral reasoning and our technological capacities has reached a critical point. It has greatly exceeded our capacity as a society right now for ethical thinking to responsibly manage that.”

"The governments have started a 'time control arms race.'"


Dr. Anderson has an informative website as well here

[Aianawa]

Ta Sam, I look forward to looking into this when time allows me.

[Shadowself]

I listened to the whole thing today. Much of what he is saying I've been touching on lately just to take note. I'd be very interested in finding out more on this technology (chamber) he's discussing.

I searched his site and cannot determine that which he is talking about. Any pointers in the right direction?

This is what I found:

http://www.andersoninstitute.com/tim...chnologies.htm

Just the other day I was posting on CTC's

http://jandeane81.com/threads/7186-6...#post841932864

[Chester]

Hi Shadowself, the graph at the end of your post #106 (that you linked above) looks very much like the graph I saw drawn by Peter Moon in a newsletter he recently released. All his information came from David Anderson.

It does appear that David Anderson is needing to be cautious as to what he divulges. He did have his patent for a Time Reactor sequestered by the US government.

[lcam88]

A member here shared a video with me at one point wherein a radio host interviews David Anderson. The doctor goes into some details about what he is doing and how.

I suspect there may be another thread here on TOT where the video is shared.

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-viB_iEm0ms


PS Thank you special member who shared this with me before.

[Chester]

His advancements since 2000 are significant.

[Shadowself]

Hi Shadowself, the graph at the end of your post #106 (that you linked above) looks very much like the graph I saw drawn by Peter Moon in a newsletter he recently released. All his information came from David Anderson.

It does appear that David Anderson is needing to be cautious as to what he divulges. He did have his patent for a Time Reactor sequestered by the US government.

Yes, in the OP listening the Time Reactor is what I was referring to. I'd be very interested in more on this "Time Reactor" he's referring to. Is there anything on his site that speaks to this tech? The link I provided has several aspects of such and I'm wondering which is the direction of this Time Reactor he's referring to.

ps; That image I provided is a "light cone" and has been referred to for quite some time in scientific circles.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_cone

[Shadowself]

Ah! Never mind...I found it. It's around the tech he worked on called frame dragging. Isn't if strange that just when he started talking about it in this interview his call got cut off?

Anyhow...it's surrounding "inertial frame-dragging"....which I've also touched upon in my thread. I referred to it as "drag on time"

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yy6J2jYuc8Y

[Chester]

That's it... essentially, the Earth (or any heavenly body for that matter) creates a bending of time via its movement and the component of gravity involved. I am clearly no scientist. What words I might state (just like the first sentence here) almost should not be written for I truly do not have enough understanding.

Yet what I do understand is his questions. Does Earth mankind possess the ethics for using such technology? Based on what I have seen... well, seen from those in charge, I would say the correct answer is a pretty big "no." Another question is... how would human beings react to the actual truth of history - if we could "go back in time at least as an observer" retaliative to what we are told now?

Here's an example... what would happen to those of an orthodox Jewish faith if they found out they weren't from some tribe which was chosen as their God's special people? That it was all just made up?

Here's another. What if there was no Jesus OR if there was a man which lived which later all sorts of legends were created about that were so far from the reality of what that man actually lived that this destroys all these Christian religions... what if the guy was never crucified? Or if he was, he died and never resurrected?

What if we find out Hitler was assisted in escaping and ended up in Argentina and that elements of the US intelligence agencies assisted with all that?

What if we can prove that 9-11 WAS an OP by some nefarious forces within "trusted" governments and not Bin Laden OR what if we find out is was Bin Laden and 19 hijackers with box cutters all along? What does the latter do to the "truther movement"?

And this is just one tiny area of questions he raises.

[Chester]

Early in the fourth podcast on this list -

Getting into space/time research... "the first thing you have to realize is that you don't see the universe as it is... you see the universe the way you are."

"Second, Understanding the concept of closed time-like curve."

"Third, understanding how space-time works."

"Study the invariance of the space-time interval."

[lcam88]

Shadowself shared a "grandfather paradox" idea in here 6 degrees thread. All this info is good to consider without forgetting about that, IMO.

[Chester]

Shadowself shared a "grandfather paradox" idea in here 6 degrees thread. All this info is good to consider without forgetting about that, IMO.

One possibility in all possibility is that we all experience infinite timelines/infinite realities. In one, you go back and kill your grandfather and as that timeline goes forward "you" do not incarnate as your grandfather's grandson because it would be impossible. Yet in another timeline, you didn't kill him (even if you went back). In ones you didn't kill him, perhaps you are still not born within that direct family line even though it could be possible.

The above simply demonstrates my open mindedness... within all possibility.

[lcam88]

In the vid that Shadowself posted, a experiment designed to observe the grandfather paradox was done, according to Anderson, with plants. It was noted that the genetics of the descendent plants changed after the experiment even though they where not exposed themselves to the CTC routines.

If you consider them to be in a state of "quantum entanglement" with their ancestor plant that was killed, it is notable that the state did change in that the genetic code no longer resembled the same lineage. That timelines may be more closely related to entanglement then would first appear.

I am especially curious about a timeline shift that is speculated to have happened around 1988 in the vid on post number 8 above.

[Chester]

I am open to all possibility.

One possibility is that all possible timelines (infinite) are all able to be experienced by the One that has tricked itself into individualizes who think their experience is separate and that each individual van experience infinite timelines.

Within this grand possibility is what "happened" in Anderson's experiment with plants and their sisters/brothers as he put it.

Perhaps it could be called an OTC (Open Time Curve) when the result is not what Anderson's experiment produced.

[lcam88]

But Sam, for an idea like yours, you must accept that the Universe is infinite as well.

That might not be the case. In fact a distinct possibility is that the universe is finite. If you imagine a universe with two photons traveling in opposite directions, even as thousands or millions of years go by, the distance between the photos will always be finite.

A model with a universe of infinite size introduces complications where entanglements include interactions between "fundamentals" that are not "the same". That introduces complications that challenge the very very basic of basics. For starters, the issue of how you define infinite boils down to one "fundamental", and then once you establish that "limit" what is beyond being another fundamental? How do they interact or interrelate?

I think of entanglement like two (or more) versions (bodies) of the same fundamental that interact in a way that the two version become an "individual" that then "experience" equilibrium and the changes therein. The finite universe model is much simpler to express in idea, concept and mathematics.

My suggestion is only that these "entanglements" exist, and they have a "state", which could be described simply as "the way it is, at the moment". And states can change from one "way it is" to another in any moment.

Perhaps these states also exist in the scalar plain where time does not perceptible in the sense we experience it. The change of state would occur any time a "manipulation" or equilibrium is altered. And even if the type of "manipulation" described by the "grandfather paradox" does involve manipulation of time, on the scalar perhaps where time is "experienced" differently, changes of state occur throughout the universe would be instantaneous. That does not mean necessarily that the "state" is ambiguous or undefined in some way. But this idea does require the universe to be finite.

I don't know if my idea is too abstract or lacking in some way, let me know though because I'm curious about how it can be better expressed.