Herbert. While I agree that some of what has been discussed on this thread lately may not be strictly about the Chris Thomas material, the truth of the matter is that Orbs is pretty much the only one keeping this thread alive, which he does by posting his contemplations of some of Chris Thomas' claims, and how they interact with what Orbs himself believes to have observed in his own mortal existence here on this planet. And all that the rest of us have done, then, was interact with Orbs in a small number of absolutely benevolent and innocent attempts to answer, to the best of our abilities, some of the questions Orbs was asking.
Furthermore, I have already asked you before -- and in no uncertain terms -- whether this thread would be open to honest discussions regarding the Chris Thomas material -- and an honest discussion must by definition include criticism of the presented material -- or whether this thread would instead be restricted to the pontification of the Chris Thomas material and to knee-jerking dismissals of anything that doesn't agree with it. You have never answered that question, and therefore the management of The One Truth assumes that this thread would indeed be open to opinions that deviate from, or even criticize, what Chris Thomas says. And please do note that while things have been posted here recently which offer a perspective that's different from what Chris Thomas claims, there has been no criticism of Chris Thomas on our part in these recent exchanges.
There is no other definition of a discussion than that it is an exchange of ideas, even -- or perhaps especially -- when these ideas are in conflict. Out of thesis and antithesis, synthesis is born. And The One Truth is a discussion forum, not a propaganda billboard. It has only barely been two weeks since we've had a couple of people here who believed otherwise, and who arrogantly acted upon this belief in total disregard for the spirit (and the management) of this forum. One of them was an old acquaintance of yours, even.
There is absolutely zero tangible evidence that the Akashic Records would even exist, notwithstanding that I personally believe that they do. There is also absolutely zero evidence that Chris Thomas would be hard-wired into the Akashic Records.
It is one thing to have an opinion -- and everyone is entitled to that -- but it is another to pontificate said opinion as the truth with zero evidence. And should you be wanting to go there nevertheless, then the dismissal of well-established and proven concepts -- such as verifiable scientific facts -- as having "zero credibility" while you have nothing that corroborates your dismissal of these things would be nothing other than arrogance.
Note that I'm not pointing any fingers just yet. I'm only stating the facts as they are. I'll leave it up to yourself to test whether the shoe fits.