First I want to add this:
From page 4 of this PDF
http://www.eng.utah.edu/~nmcdonal/Tu...archReview.pdf
~
So if you were going to leave a coded message from the future you would definitely want to leave it before this period of 1900 B.C. right?
That tomb was before the advent of such cryptography in Egypt during the reign of Hatshepsut in 1473 B.C.
The tomb was discovered during the 1925-1927 excavations. So you have a discovery year to work with here and you have a time when Cryptography was not in use. Perfect for such an experiment.
~
I could probably fill several pages with evidence that this tomb was tampered with in such a way as to convey the message I assert is here.
Starting with the dig:
Here is the first excavation. In it you see the attempt to seal it off with a thick wall. But the top is open upon excavation. Now that may not seem so strange but the time it had to be opened was before a huge pile of clay chips were deposited in front of the entrance which were from tomb 71 Senemuts other tomb. You see Senemut had two tombs. One was more of a funerary tomb which was meant for burial. However they never found a mummy there as I'm aware. That would be tomb # 71. It's tomb 353 that is in question here.
At the first stage of clearing the upper left hand corner image is what they found. An opening big enough for someone to enter it. It's been claimed that is how they must have left it. That is absurd...The closing of this tomb would be complete not left open like this in this manner.
~
When Dr Peter F. Dorman who is a renowned Egyptologist and epigrapher, philologist was doing his thesis on this dig he
first of all found that the records of the dig were almost non existent. In other words the original notes on this dig have turned up missing. The only notes that Herbert Winlock has are what he turned in to the Metropolitan Museum and this is all. The original notes are just gone. As stated by Dr. Dorman in this thesis/book. This dig was commissioned by the NY Metropolitan Museum of art by Herbert Winlock the person in charge of this dig would have kept daily records of the dig. They are just gone. Disappeared. However he did write a book on the dig and there is where it gets strange...because all that is there is Winlock's after the fact assertions. Which Peter F Dorman brings into great question while giving Winlock great props for the find.
You see in Dr. Dorman's thesis he (who knows a great deal about deciphering Hieroglyphs) has about 40 pages on Chamber A (the chamber with the astronomical ceiling) and has worked to decipher them. The problem is it was not easy and he asserts very often two main problems:
1) The walls around this chamber are filled with "mistakes". ie from his thesis/book:
......."N" is missplaced?
But that's not all. In this forty pages of a 284 page thesis/ turned book....he makes several distinct notes which make the wall of this chamber even stranger.
2) the hieroglyphs are "mixed' with Hieratic Script which was painted and added on to the "carved" scripts around the walls. Which as I think you might remember I asserted in earlier posts that around the false door would probably contain the actual coded message. Now Hieratic Script is not usually found on the walls of tombs as a general rule..let alone mixed with standard Hieroglyphs.
But that's not all. There are distinct "changes" noted by several scholars who've worked to figure out this chamber. None of which make sense.
From two different sources first one Dr Dorman asserts on the "water mark"....described as the sixth cluster:
The sixth cluster is out of place?
but he also asserts on the writing in that cluster:
In the 40 pages of decyphered texts on the wall and ceiling he has several times admitted it's been "hacked". Unusual term indeed considering my assertations.
He is not the only one to notice the hacking of the tomb. The Standing Man on the bottom half has been noted by several authors on this tomb and referred to as changed and hacked.
~
Now, just so you know around the walls of that chamber is the Book of the Dead and it's been massively hacked with painted Hieratic Script. In fact here is some of that script painted on and they are dates as an example of such hacking.
Of course Dr. Dorman is not going to write a thesis and assert this has been hacked from someone in the future right? But I am convinced it is because of the massive inconstant things within that ceiling and the walls that surround it. Not one person who has studied this tomb can make sense of the placement within that ceiling, room and much of it's content. Even Dr. Dorman asserts they "made mistakes" and he greatly attempts to make sense of it. Some of which I flatly disagree with. One example would be his assertion on the two turtles I mentioned in an earlier post for which his explanation makes absolutely no sense at all.
Here is the book for your review but I warn you it's long. And everything I'm about to share of it's content are in this book.
http://libmma.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm...ll10/id/176704
In ancient Egyptian this is the letter N:
So I don't know encryption or cryptography but I know there is something here and it's starts with "N".