Well Icam88 good to hear from you finally.
The conclusion I recently suggested: Posts numbered 125 thru 129 cannot be singled out by only one post such as 129. That is but an aspect of the entire subject matter.
Oh I said matter...LOL
quantum (plural: quanta) is the minimum amount of any physical entity involved in an interaction. Behind this, one finds the fundamental notion that a physical property may be "quantized".
A photon is a single quantum of (visible) light as well as all other forms of electromagnetic radiation and can be referred to as a "light quantum". The energy of an electron bound to an atom is quantized, which results in the stability of atoms, and hence of matter in general.
To delve into the subject matter of time travel and avoiding the paradox for the "first time" "Alpha Tau" as suggested in that series of posts above is what I've proposed. To uncover the code is what is key here at the moment or it means absolutely nothing and I'm completely wrong. But the amount of work I've done so far has told me otherwise. I will find it!...when I do I will publish it.
So to the proposed questions asserting your questions regarding one aspect of Number 129 and the entanglement aspects of a wormhole let me share this:
"Electric fields can thread a classical Einstein-Rosen bridge. Maldacena and Susskind have recently suggested that in a theory of dynamical gravity the entanglement of ordinary perturbative quanta should be viewed as creating a quantum version of an Einstein-Rosen bridge between the particles, or a “quantum wormhole.”
They have demonstrate within low-energy effective field theory that there is a precise sense in which electric fields can also thread such quantum wormholes. Defined a nonperturbative “wormhole susceptibility” that measures the ease of passing an electric field through any sort of wormhole.
The susceptibility of a quantum wormhole is suppressed by powers of the gauge coupling relative to that for a classical wormhole but can be made numerically equal with a sufficiently large amount of entangled matter."
So...If I have actually found the unproven paradox as a success of the First time/Alpha Tau respectively; and you have asked this:
Maybe it is more important to focus on the motions and energies at play in the space around materials and objects? Would that reveal new meaning in the materials you are sharing?
Ahhhh....yes. It's a great deal to to with focus and motion. A wormhole 'spins'. We are sitting right now in a galaxy that spins...within that galaxy we are in a solar system that is in spin within that galactic spin. We are on a planet that spins in a solar system that is spinning within a galaxy that is spinning. So yes....that would be a focal point. Remember in the coffin texts on one of these pages here I wrote and it's quoted within the Coffin Texts: "My power is on the horizon". The horizon would be the edge of the black hole within the center of the galaxy. Least we not forget we are sitting in a "space time vortex" which has been proven.
How do we gauge time? By the spin of our planet. Is time different by large objects such as the Great Pyramid? Yes. Drag on time is what this amounts to. So to answer your questions. YES! Motion is key to discovering the secrets of TIME and the possibility to travel in either direction. ie; past or future.
I hope this answers your question sufficiently. But make no mistake ...Entanglement is part of the equation.
ps; you know I have the utmost respect for your input here.