Originally posted by
Aragorn
You're talking of a phased array, right? Isn't that how HAARP works?
HAARP can do deep underground radar-like geological scanning with only
30 Watt of power, but the most powerful HAARP installations currently in use -- like the one in Norway -- are capable of producing
1 GigaWatt worth of power. That's
1'000'000'000 Watt. They can do quite a bit of damage with that. No, not "can"; they
do, actually...
I'm not trying to supply any fear porn, but people
should be informed...:
A gigawatt of power. That's a lot of energy, truly an awful lot.
I'd like to see the antenna system they use to launch that amount of radio frequency energy. But more interestingly I'd like to know how a device with that much energy can be operated without detection by amateur scientists monitoring the ionosphere and magnetosphere all over the earth.
The video has also confused what shields the earth from various dangerous radiations. Almost all the shielding takes place in the
ozone layer, not the ionosphere.
There are guys (well mostly guys) out there who routinely monitor all manner of terrestrial man-made and natural signals from DC to light. I really don't think they'd miss a HAARP transmission or anything similar much below 100 watts, never mind a gigawatt!
Also, over the horizon radar using the ionosphere has been around since at least the 1970s. Ionospheric heating of the ionosphere is not practical (and usually unnecessary) to increase its reflective properties. See
these images of what the Soviets used for over the horizon radar!! Makes HAARP look pathetic by comparison in size and capability.
The video says various 'assertions' were made regarding the effects of this Soviet device. Assertions are one thing, but there was no actual evidence of any damage to anything, apart from huge levels of unavoidable radio interference it generated, detected by government and amateur observers in every continent.
Babs
Bookmarks