Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 31

Thread: Strange Sounds in the Sky. (the never-ending series)

  1. #16
    Retired Member
    Join Date
    13th September 2013
    Location
    Rockies Foothills
    Posts
    4,982
    Thanks
    9,075
    Thanked 18,116 Times in 3,777 Posts
    Quote Originally posted by Bob View Post
    What would be the issues? I would think some would relate to being seen or not seen by spy satellites, if that much energy is directed into an area that may trigger monitoring satellites too, and if other winds aloft and at ground level, would be too strong, and would blow away anything being created. The guess is they would have performed 'research' to determine solutions for those issues.. the last articles published on weather control are pretty old, sorta like things went dark after effectiveness was demonstrated in Mexico to deal with some drought issues.
    this whistleblower has evidence that HAARP-like units are peppered around the globe, hidden, beneath the ocean.
    so, we gave up our land-based HAARP units.
    turns out, if she's correct, we don't need them any more.
    and can you tell this woman believes she is on a mission, from god ; )


    Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e127ohch4Dw


    these are in the pacific ocean, directed at US.

    Last edited by jimmer, 6th June 2015 at 15:47.

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jimmer For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (5th June 2015), Woody (5th June 2015)

  3. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    19th March 2015
    Posts
    131
    Thanks
    86
    Thanked 589 Times in 129 Posts
    Quote Originally posted by Aragorn View Post
    You're talking of a phased array, right? Isn't that how HAARP works?

    HAARP can do deep underground radar-like geological scanning with only 30 Watt of power, but the most powerful HAARP installations currently in use -- like the one in Norway -- are capable of producing 1 GigaWatt worth of power. That's 1'000'000'000 Watt. They can do quite a bit of damage with that. No, not "can"; they do, actually...

    I'm not trying to supply any fear porn, but people should be informed...:

    A gigawatt of power. That's a lot of energy, truly an awful lot.

    I'd like to see the antenna system they use to launch that amount of radio frequency energy. But more interestingly I'd like to know how a device with that much energy can be operated without detection by amateur scientists monitoring the ionosphere and magnetosphere all over the earth.

    The video has also confused what shields the earth from various dangerous radiations. Almost all the shielding takes place in the ozone layer, not the ionosphere.

    There are guys (well mostly guys) out there who routinely monitor all manner of terrestrial man-made and natural signals from DC to light. I really don't think they'd miss a HAARP transmission or anything similar much below 100 watts, never mind a gigawatt!

    Also, over the horizon radar using the ionosphere has been around since at least the 1970s. Ionospheric heating of the ionosphere is not practical (and usually unnecessary) to increase its reflective properties. See these images of what the Soviets used for over the horizon radar!! Makes HAARP look pathetic by comparison in size and capability.

    The video says various 'assertions' were made regarding the effects of this Soviet device. Assertions are one thing, but there was no actual evidence of any damage to anything, apart from huge levels of unavoidable radio interference it generated, detected by government and amateur observers in every continent.

    Babs

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Barbarella For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (5th June 2015), jimmer (5th June 2015), Woody (5th June 2015)

  5. #18
    Administrator Aragorn's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2015
    Location
    Middle-Earth
    Posts
    20,293
    Thanks
    88,644
    Thanked 81,103 Times in 20,306 Posts
    Quote Originally posted by Barbarella View Post
    A gigawatt of power. That's a lot of energy, truly an awful lot.
    It is, and especially if you know what they can already do with a meager 30 Watt.

    Quote Originally posted by Barbarella View Post
    I'd like to see the antenna system they use to launch that amount of radio frequency energy.
    Here you go. But keep in mind that there are dozens of such installations all over the northern hemisphere -- including some that are quite a bit larger than this one here-below -- and a few in the southern hemisphere as well.








    Quote Originally posted by Barbarella View Post
    But more interestingly I'd like to know how a device with that much energy can be operated without detection by amateur scientists monitoring the ionosphere and magnetosphere all over the earth.
    Oh, it is being detected alright. But just as with chemtrails, any and all criticism is simply laughed away, or it is just being denied in spite of the solid evidence presented. In this day and age, the words "conspiracy theorist" are an easily applied label, and a very effective tool for truth suppression.

    Quote Originally posted by Barbarella View Post
    The video has also confused what shields the earth from various dangerous radiations. Almost all the shielding takes place in the ozone layer, not the ionosphere.
    I'm afraid that's not quite correct. The ozone layer filters and reflects short-wave UV light and similar radiation, but all of the heavy lifting with regard to cosmic radiation, solar winds, coronal mass ejections et al, is taken care of by the magnetosphere and the Van Allen belts.

    Furthermore, a few years ago, the HAARP researchers even prided themselves in that they had managed to punch a hole through the ionosphere, thereby temporarily drawing in part of the exosphere to a significantly lower altitude. What they did not mention, however, was what influence this has had on the weather in the northern hemisphere.

    Quote Originally posted by Barbarella View Post
    There are guys (well mostly guys) out there who routinely monitor all manner of terrestrial man-made and natural signals from DC to light. I really don't think they'd miss a HAARP transmission or anything similar much below 100 watts, never mind a gigawatt!
    See higher up.

    Quote Originally posted by Barbarella View Post
    Also, over the horizon radar using the ionosphere has been around since at least the 1970s. Ionospheric heating of the ionosphere is not practical (and usually unnecessary) to increase its reflective properties. See these images of what the Soviets used for over the horizon radar!! Makes HAARP look pathetic by comparison in size and capability.

    The video says various 'assertions' were made regarding the effects of this Soviet device. Assertions are one thing, but there was no actual evidence of any damage to anything, apart from huge levels of unavoidable radio interference it generated, detected by government and amateur observers in every continent.

    Babs
    There were also several reports of alleged physiological harassment by way of the device. I'm guessing that the only reason as to why the NATO allies didn't really care to (officially) investigate was that they were trying to come up with a similar technology of their own.
    Last edited by Aragorn, 6th June 2015 at 02:06. Reason: typographical correction
    = DEATH BEFORE DISHONOR =

  6. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Aragorn For This Useful Post:

    jimmer (5th June 2015), Olaf (6th June 2015), Woody (5th June 2015)

  7. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    19th March 2015
    Posts
    131
    Thanks
    86
    Thanked 589 Times in 129 Posts
    Those antennas are horizontal dipole arrays and from the apparent size I'd say they worked at about 5 MHz, plus or minus. There's no way they'd radiate more that a few tens of megawatts without burning out, and certainly not a gigawatt, not even as an effective radiated power (the gain combined from phasing each antenna).

    I write for a number of professional and amateur broadcast engineering magazines and have spent some decades in the RF business - at both ends.

    If HAARP and its like had a fraction of the power that has been attributed to it, every time they operated they'd leave a huge electromagnetic footprint. All manner of monitoring equipment would go off the scale. When there are guys in Europe radiating beacon signals of only 10mW (that's 10 milliwatts, 0.010 watt) for ionospheric study on 7, 10, 14 MHz that are more than 20dB below the noise when received in Alaska and New Zealand, a gigawatt of HAARP isn't going to sneak past them!

    One may surmise that official observations may be 'suppressed', but most of the enthusiastic amateurs I know would be the first to bring any dodgy, weird signal to all out attention via the various forums. New stuff occasionally gets flagged up - usually new HF military comms or ELF tests to submarines.

    Indeed the ionosphere is certainly affected by cosmic rays, X-rays and UV light. This is very (and suddenly) apparent during a solar flare and the intense ionization of the D-layer.

    Babs

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Barbarella For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (5th June 2015), jimmer (5th June 2015), Woody (5th June 2015)

  9. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    19th March 2015
    Posts
    131
    Thanks
    86
    Thanked 589 Times in 129 Posts
    Who says HAARP has got a power of 1 G-watt? Is that the RF output power or the transmitter input power?

    Even if the transmitter is as much as 75% efficient, at least 1.25 GW has to come from somewhere. That's not a huge power plant, but quite difficult to hide. What fuel does it use? Presumably oil or natural gas up in Alaska. but where is it? Underground? With no chimneys or cooling towers? Or nuclear maybe. Who constructed it and moved all the spoil - and put it where?

    What devices are supplying this gigawatt? Thermionic devices, solid state? Something new? And how is it being cooled?

    Sorry, too many unanswered questions maybe...

    Back on topic. I get the impression the whole 'Sounds in the Sky' thing was started as a hoax by some clever art/media students savvy with the internet and creating internet memes to see where they go, like the metal boxes washed up on the Oregon coast in 2012.

    OTOH, is there any plausible explanation for these sounds generated in the atmosphere? And why now?

    Babs

  10. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Barbarella For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (5th June 2015), Bob (5th June 2015), jimmer (5th June 2015), Woody (6th June 2015)

  11. #21
    Retired Member
    Join Date
    13th September 2013
    Location
    Rockies Foothills
    Posts
    4,982
    Thanks
    9,075
    Thanked 18,116 Times in 3,777 Posts
    ok, my eye are drying out reading this technical back and forth. (brilliant as I'm sure it is : )

    now that we see a connection between HAARP, chemtrails and sky sounds, check this out.
    you don't need to speak french to get the picture.

    Last edited by jimmer, 6th June 2015 at 14:41.

  12. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to jimmer For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (5th June 2015), Bob (5th June 2015), Woody (6th June 2015)

  13. #22
    Administrator Aragorn's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2015
    Location
    Middle-Earth
    Posts
    20,293
    Thanks
    88,644
    Thanked 81,103 Times in 20,306 Posts
    Quote Originally posted by Barbarella View Post
    Who says HAARP has got a power of 1 G-watt? Is that the RF output power or the transmitter input power?
    As I recall, it was both David Wilcock and Richard C. Hoagland who claimed that it has 1 GigaWatt of power, or at least, whereas the installation in Norway is concerned -- this was around the time of the infamous Norway Spiral. I have no factual evidence on whether that is true, and I have my doubts about Hoagland, although Wilcock does seem like a credible information source to me.

    However, according to the documentary here-below -- which features one of the scientists who filed for (at least some of) the patents used in HAARP -- the installation in Alaska had or has 1 MegaWatt of power. That's 1'000'000 Watts.


    Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SToVBicIrJU


    According to Wikipedia, current HAARP power levels are up to 3.6 MegaWatt already -- that's output power, not input power -- at 2.8 to 10 MHz.

    Quote Originally posted by Barbarella View Post
    Even if the transmitter is as much as 75% efficient, at least 1.25 GW has to come from somewhere. That's not a huge power plant, but quite difficult to hide. What fuel does it use? Presumably oil or natural gas up in Alaska. but where is it? Underground? With no chimneys or cooling towers? Or nuclear maybe. Who constructed it and moved all the spoil - and put it where?
    I don't know where they are getting their power from. Presumably they have their own generators -- gas turbines, probably -- but they may also be hooked up to the grid. The HAARP project falls under US military oversight, so that makes access to all the information highly restricted either way.

    Quote Originally posted by Barbarella View Post
    [...]

    Back on topic. I get the impression the whole 'Sounds in the Sky' thing was started as a hoax by some clever art/media students savvy with the internet and creating internet memes to see where they go, like the metal boxes washed up on the Oregon coast in 2012.

    OTOH, is there any plausible explanation for these sounds generated in the atmosphere? And why now?

    Babs
    Several plausible explanations have been offered higher up in the thread already, given that it concerns a whole range of sounds, some of which are very different and probably do have their own distinct causes.
    Last edited by Aragorn, 6th June 2015 at 02:09. Reason: grammatical correction
    = DEATH BEFORE DISHONOR =

  14. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Aragorn For This Useful Post:

    Bob (5th June 2015), jimmer (5th June 2015), Woody (6th June 2015)

  15. #23
    Retired Member
    Join Date
    4th December 2014
    Location
    currently USA
    Posts
    523
    Thanks
    2,667
    Thanked 2,939 Times in 516 Posts
    Quote Originally posted by Barbarella View Post
    [..] Back on topic. I get the impression the whole 'Sounds in the Sky' thing was started as a hoax by some clever art/media students savvy with the internet and creating internet memes to see where they go, like the metal boxes washed up on the Oregon coast in 2012.

    OTOH, is there any plausible explanation for these sounds generated in the atmosphere? And why now?

    Babs
    I've heard the trumpet sounds and to me it was more like that massive ocean-liner horn blowing, but with a characteristic that sound like the more musical Mac truck type of horn. Turning one's head, there were several degrees of sound source.. to me that was at least a 10 mile or so perspective where the sounds were coming from, from the SKY in the west.

    Within a day or so aftewards, there were loud explosion sounds, which sounded like the blasting that is done when avalanche control is happening.

    The coincidence was earth had just been hit with a very large CME. It's possible that there were coronal holes earthfacing too, but I haven't correlated. I considered such interesting, and did some looking up on the internet and came across what Malc found.. and a website which had a history of sounds being reported. I don't know how anyone could have hoaxed what I heard, both the 'trumpets' and the massive explosion sounds..

    ==Post Update==

    Here is a link that has some more information on the mechanics of the sky sounds

    http://www.sott.net/article/240826-N...he-Apocalypse- "trumpets of the apocalypse"

    11 min video - this offers some other thoughts..:


    Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=/BUDYcapY1Qo


    when you hear the sample of the audios recorded, its like woahhhh...


    This next video presents the explosion sounds that I heard pretty accurately.. (from about 20 seconds to about 1 min 30 seconds)


    Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0BvIySscEY
    Last edited by Bob, 6th June 2015 at 00:11.

  16. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Bob For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (6th June 2015), jimmer (6th June 2015), Olaf (6th June 2015), Woody (6th June 2015)

  17. #24
    Retired Member
    Join Date
    13th September 2013
    Location
    Rockies Foothills
    Posts
    4,982
    Thanks
    9,075
    Thanked 18,116 Times in 3,777 Posts
    for your weekend strange sky (cave) sounds listening pleasure,
    the tibetan monk cave – sounds of the spirit. (wait for it...)


    Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZLlgpAqcW4

    here's a website devoted to these on-going global acoustic events.
    scroll down a very long list to review these many ear rattling happenings, beginning in 2008.

    http://strangesounds.org/strange-sounds

  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jimmer For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (6th June 2015), Bob (6th June 2015)

  19. #25
    Retired Member
    Join Date
    13th September 2013
    Location
    Rockies Foothills
    Posts
    4,982
    Thanks
    9,075
    Thanked 18,116 Times in 3,777 Posts
    Quote Originally posted by Aragorn View Post
    that, is one powerful video indictment.

    so, it appears that sky sounds may very well be the audio residue from what began as a method to search for gas and oil,
    that has morphed into a climate control tool, that led to a means of controlling entire global governments and their populations.
    that's one hell of an investigative trail.

    once again, here's hopkins revealing the global oceanic HAARP network.
    (pls. recall that this brave woman is not the source of this information.
    she is a conduit of information provided to her by either inside or retired military operatives.
    excuse her biblical references for this is her precarious calling.)



  20. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jimmer For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (6th June 2015), Bob (6th June 2015)

  21. #26
    Retired Member
    Join Date
    13th September 2013
    Location
    Rockies Foothills
    Posts
    4,982
    Thanks
    9,075
    Thanked 18,116 Times in 3,777 Posts
    a chemtrails pilot speaks out.
    his rationale is pretty startling.
    chemtrails provide an 'atmospheric shield of protection' from rogue-nation EMP attacks.
    really?


  22. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jimmer For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (6th June 2015), Bob (6th June 2015)

  23. #27
    Retired Member
    Join Date
    13th September 2013
    Location
    Rockies Foothills
    Posts
    4,982
    Thanks
    9,075
    Thanked 18,116 Times in 3,777 Posts
    dane wigington (one of the leading chemtrail activists) organized this
    2014 shasta, CA city council meeting to expose the reality and threats
    connected to geo-engineering.

    so what happens when the citizenry becomes outraged, yet our representatives do nothing?
    next election cycle require local and national politicos to take a position!


  24. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jimmer For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (6th June 2015), Bob (6th June 2015)

  25. #28
    Retired Member
    Join Date
    13th September 2013
    Location
    Rockies Foothills
    Posts
    4,982
    Thanks
    9,075
    Thanked 18,116 Times in 3,777 Posts
    "soon after dispensing cw-7, the world froze – all life became extinct."

    that's how the movie, snow piercer, begins –
    with a vision of planes laying down heavy chemtrails to combat global warming.

    it's worth your time.

    http://trailers.apple.com/trailers/i...t/snowpiercer/

  26. The Following User Says Thank You to jimmer For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (7th June 2015)

  27. #29
    Retired Member
    Join Date
    13th September 2013
    Location
    Rockies Foothills
    Posts
    4,982
    Thanks
    9,075
    Thanked 18,116 Times in 3,777 Posts
    aragorn posted a compilation that included parts of this full documentary.

    anyone interested in the sounds, HAARP and chemtrails subjects should give this a watch.

    the trove of testimonial experts is joined by dr. begich (featured in a posted video presentation, above).

    one of the most interesting aspects, running gags throughout, is the counterpoints added by project manager and PR guy
    for the HAARP program. a real mut and jeff hilarity.

    (click on the youtube logo to watch at YT)

    Last edited by jimmer, 8th June 2015 at 16:14.

  28. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jimmer For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (8th June 2015), ERK (8th June 2015)

  29. #30
    Retired Member
    Join Date
    1st April 2015
    Posts
    156
    Thanks
    29
    Thanked 888 Times in 150 Posts
    The fact is that, given the importance and magnitude of the phenomenon, addressed one of the most influential scientists who studied the sounds: the prof. Elchin Khalilov, a geophysicist who works in the field of geodynamics. Khalilov graduated in geophysics at the Azerbaijan State Oil Academy in 1981. Until 1984 he was a student graduate at the Institute of Geology IMGubkin Academy of Sciences in Azerbaijan and in the same year was awarded the highest award for young scientists in Azerbaijan through the Lenin Komsomol Award Azerbaijan in Science and Technology in recognition of his scientific achievements. In 1990 he defended his doctoral thesis at the 'Lomonosov Moscow State University on the study and prediction of earthquakes and volcanic eruptions, and was awarded the highest academic degree as doctor of geological and mineralogical sciences.

    Elchin Khalilov in the center of the image. Credit: wikipedia.org
    Mr. Khalilov, what is the unusual nature of the sounds reported by a large number of people in different parts of the world since the summer of 2011?
    Many call them "The sounds of 'Revelation'. The reports we have received from all over the world: USA, United Kingdom, Costa Rica, Russia, Czech Republic, Australia, Brazil, Ukraine, etc. We have analyzed these sounds and found that most is within the range of infrasound, which is inaudible to humans. What people feel is therefore only a small fraction of the actual power of these sounds. It is noise at low frequency in the range between 20 and 100 Hz modulated by waves of infrasound very low, between 0.1-15 Hz. In geophysics, are called acoustic waves of gravity; They are formed in the upper atmosphere, especially on the border with the ionosphere. Reasons attributable to these waves could be earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, hurricanes, storms, tsunamis, etc., but the scale of the ringing observed in terms of both area and power, far exceeds that which can be generated by these phenomena.

    Various newspapers around the world speak of sounds
    In this case, what might be causing this hum in the sky?
    In our opinion, the source of such immense and powerful manifestation of these acoustic waves of gravity would come from large energy processes. These processes include powerful solar flares and huge energy flows they generate, running toward the earth's surface and destabilizing the magnetosphere, ionosphere and upper atmosphere. Therefore, the effects of powerful solar explosions, the resulting impact of the shock waves in the solar wind, flows of corpuscles and bursts of electromagnetic radiation, would be the main causes of generation of acoustic waves of gravitation, following the increase of 'solar activity. Given the increase in solar activity (due to normal eleven-year cycle of schwabe, ed), leading to increased solar flares from the middle of 2011, we can assume that there is a high probability of correlation between the two phenomena. It should be pointed out that solar activity began to intensify sharply since early 2011, with its amplitude significantly greater than all the forecasts given by a number of leading scientific institutions in 2010 and 2011. Meanwhile, the observed increase of 'solar activity is fully consistent with the forecasts delGEOCHANGE, International Committee of the report published in June 2010. If this rate of growth of solar activity continues, its size by the end of 2012 will exceed the range of the solar cycle 23 , and in 2013-2014 the solar activity will reach its peak. The amplitude envisaged by us will be of 1.5 - 1.7 times greater than the amplitude of the cycle 23.

    Our star
    But she said that because of the "sounds of the apocalypse" comes from inside the Earth's core. What does it mean?
    There are many possible causes relating these sounds. The fact is that the acceleration of the drift of the magnetic north pole of the Earth, has increased more than fivefold between 1998 and 2003 and is at the same level of points of intensification of energy processes in the Earth, since they are processes in the interior and in the exterior of the core, to form the geomagnetic field of the Earth. Meanwhile, as already we reported, November 15, 2011 all ATROPATENA geophysical stations that record the three-dimensional variations of the gravity field of the Earth, almost simultaneously reported a gravitational boost. Gift stations located in Istanbul, Kiev, Baku, Islamabad and Yogyakarta with a distance between the first and the last of about 10,000 kilometers. This phenomenon is therefore only possible if the source of this issue is the level of the Earth's core. The enormous energy release occurred from the core of the Earth at the end of last year, was a kind of start signal indicating the passage of the internal energy of the Earth to a new active phase. The intensification of energy processes in the Earth's capable of modulating the Earth's magnetic field, through a chain of physical processes in the ionosphere, generating acoustic waves of gravity in an audible range, heard by the world population in the form of a frightening sound low frequency in different parts of our planet. In both cases, although the cause is quite understandable for geophysicists, they are indicative of the expected significant increase in solar activity and geodynamics of our planet. If all this were true, we might expect. There is no doubt that the Earth's internal processes regulate the energy of our planet, and therefore, we should expect for the end of 2012 a sharp increase in earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, tsunamis and extreme weather events, with even higher levels, however, during the solar maximum in 2013-2014.
    IN CONCLUSION - So, are still many doubts related to this matter, even though according to the scientist would be to exclude the media hoax. In his opinion the sounds would come from natural causes related to geological phenomena influenced by solar activity. If that were the case we would be facing an interesting phenomenon to be studied.

  30. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to solarimplosion For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (8th June 2015), jimmer (8th June 2015)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •