From: The "Ruiner"
COMMENTS:Compassion for The Programmed
Many of you readers, if not all, have been spending a vast amount of time and energy trying to deprogram.
Whether it's from the cultural conditioning or more aggressive styles of programming or self inflicted patterns and traps, deprogramming is a very difficult and often long task.
For victims of aggressive programming as is involved with some major celebrities, or human slaves, or clone center toys, or shadow program ( military and space and science ) and MILABS and Monarchs - this can be near impossible for some to heal from well enough to effectively deprogram.
They break these people in ways most cannot fathom. Not even the level of violence in your media compares. Your writer recalls a decorated military killer seeing for himself what some of the clone toys go through and he said "I would watch 100 unarmed men be beheaded over watching that again any day."
All are bad, some worse than others in some ways but it's literally just picking a poison.
For some it's a violation of the body. For some it's a violation of the mind. For some it's the violation of their very will.
For some it's all of the above.
So let us remember this when dealing with or listening to or simply viewing these people.
From your Pop Stars and BlockBuster Needle Movers, to your clones and shadow program victims, Politicians and MILABS. Everyone you can think of.
Let us send them love, understanding that their actions are inexcusable but can be forgiven, so that perhaps they can have the strength to admit their own weakness. Let go of their delusions and illusions.
And Heal.
"Let us send them love, understanding that their actions are inexcusable but can be forgiven" (The Ruiner)
[Comment] I had a very heated argument last nigh about the idea of "forgiveness" … quite synchronistic … I say, the idea of forgiveness … the way most people think of it … is nothing more than "stockholm syndrome" … what is your definition of this term?[The Ruiner] Your writer considers forgiveness an art. He also considers the process partially complete if the transgressor has not asked for forgiveness.
With that said he would define forgiveness as the art of understanding wrongdoing well and choosing to release the emotional/energetic charge you hold from the actions of the one you are looking to forgive.
Your writer believes we forgive others, for our own well being. Which in turn becomes our well being.
Opinion of course. It's about making a choice. To hold a grudge or resentment, can be giving away power. If you do not have the will to forgive, don't.
To forgive is not to forget. Fool me twice... Because you are forgiven does not excuse your actions.
If you would like to share your thoughts on this, they would be welcomed.
Your writer is not asking you to forgive anyone here. Understanding and learning only. Oh, and love.Comment For me, I’ve never understood “A Course in Miracles” LOL (always thought of it as some sort of “psyops” operation) … Forgiveness, in my opinion would have to require the “transgressors” to play a role … I am not sure the “mind” that you talk about is even capable of that …
I would have to go with the idea of “forgiveness” as being a mute point anyway … to get an idea of what I am talking about please consider the following …
"Forgiveness Is Not True Compassion"
(J. Krishnamurti)
"What is it to be compassionate? … [F]eel it out, whether a mind that is hurt, that can be hurt, can ever forgive. Can a mind that is capable of being hurt, ever forgive? And can such a mind which is capable of being hurt, which is cultivating virtue, which is conscious of generosity, can such a mind be compassionate? Compassion, as love, is something which is not of the mind. The mind is not conscious of itself as being compassionate, as loving. But the moment you forgive consciously, the mind is strengthening its own center in its own hurt. So the mind which consciously forgives can never forgive; it does not know forgiveness; it forgives in order not to be further hurt. So it is very important to find out why the mind actually remembers, stores away. Because the mind is everlastingly seeking to aggrandize itself, to become big, to be something When the mind is willing not to be anything, to be nothing, completely nothing, then in that state there is compassion. In that state there is neither forgiveness nor the state of hurt; but to understand that, one has to understand the conscious development of the 'me'. So, as long as there is the conscious cultivation of any particular influence, any particular virtue, there can be no love, there can be no compassion, because love and compassion are not the result of conscious effort."