Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: House Legislation Paves the Way for War with Russia?

  1. #1
    Retired Member
    Join Date
    13th September 2013
    Posts
    1,380
    Thanks
    8,603
    Thanked 8,070 Times in 1,329 Posts

    House Legislation Paves the Way for War with Russia?

    Nice to know the Cabal Stooges (otherwise known as the Congress Critters) are working hard to ensure the world population enjoys the holiday (of their choice) seasons ...



    _______________________



    America is on a “Hot War Footing”: House Legislation Paves the Way for War with Russia?


    America is on a war footing. While, a World War Three Scenario has been on the drawing board of the Pentagon for more than ten years, military action against Russia is now contemplated at an “operational level”. Similarly, both the Senate and the House have introduced enabling legislation which provides legitimacy to the conduct of a war against Russia.

    We are not dealing with a “Cold War”. None of the safeguards of the Cold War era prevail.

    There has been a breakdown in East-West diplomacy coupled with extensive war propaganda. In turn the United Nations has turned a blind eye to extensive war crimes committed by the Western military alliance.

    The adoption of a major piece of legislation by the US House of Representatives on December 4th (H. Res. 758) would provide (pending a vote in the Senate) a de facto green light to the US president and commander in chief to initiate –without congressional approval– a process of military confrontation with Russia.

    Global security is at stake. This historic vote –which potentially could affect the lives of hundreds of millions of people Worldwide– has received virtually no media coverage. A total media blackout prevails.

    The World is at a dangerous crossroads. Moscow has responded to US-NATO threats. Its borders are threatened.

    On December 3, the Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation announced the inauguration of a new military-political entity which would take over in the case of war.


    much more:

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/america...russia/5418035


    ______________________


    Groaning Towards War against Russia on Capitol Hill. House Resolution 758

    The US House of Representatives might have though it through a bit more, but House Resolution 758, the handiwork of Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill), passed with 98 percent of the vote.[1] The text lasts a dreary 16 pages, but that is the least of it. It states, in the undusted, revised language of Cold War vitriol, the agenda of Russia’s Vladimir Putin, which the House accuses of using “a policy of aggression against neighbouring countries aimed at political and economic domination.” It makes reference to Russia’s purported violation of “each of the 10 principles of the 1975 Helsinki Accords in its relations with Ukraine.”


    (*snip*)


    Ron Paul, in his reaction to the passage of HR 758, attacked the resolution’s use of language “that should have made even the neocons blush”. [2] World War Three, argues Paul, is effectively around the corner, the result of “one of the worst pieces of legislation ever”.

    As an avid watcher of such resolutions in Congress, Paul claims that such wording is pregnant with consequences. In 1998, the Iraq Liberation Act proved to be the precursor for invasion in 2003. “I did not oppose the Act because I was an admirer of Saddam Hussein – just as now I am not an admirer of Putin or any foreign political leader – but rather because I knew then that another war against Iraq would not solve the problems and would probably make things worse. We all know what happened next.”

    Even before Paul’s response, former US congressman Dennis Kucinich suggested that HR 758 was “tantamount to a ‘Declaration of Cold War’.” [3] “NATO encirclement, the US-backed coup in Ukraine, an attempt to use an agreement with the European Union to bring NATO into Ukraine at the Russian border and a US nuclear first-strike policy are all policies which attempt to substitute force for diplomacy” (Press TV, Dec 3). Time, it would seem, to dig in for the bloody, and expensive long haul.


    http://www.globalresearch.ca/groanin...on-758/5418583
    Last edited by Calz, 8th December 2014 at 05:32. Reason: typo

  2. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Calz For This Useful Post:

    Cearna (8th December 2014), jimmer (16th December 2014), norman (8th December 2014), Ria (8th December 2014), sandy (16th December 2014), Sooz (8th December 2014), Spiral (8th December 2014), Woody (8th December 2014)

  3. #2
    Retired Member
    Join Date
    13th September 2013
    Posts
    1,380
    Thanks
    8,603
    Thanked 8,070 Times in 1,329 Posts
    Perhaps WWIII doesn't fit into anyone's happy zone???


    Anything that matters is scripted.


    How many decades ago was this planned???


    World economic collapse and world war (ebola seems to be lagging as the worldwide pandemic was part of the plan).


    World on their knees begging for the NWO to save them ...


    Bluebeam ... save us from those nasty aliens!!!


    Well ... let's break it down a bit shall we???


    Oil prices ... SA and OPEC able to collapse the two most powerful nations on the world by keeping their pumps open???


    Please ...


    You really think natural market forces could bring down oil prices that much???


    Hey ... what a coincidence ... written into the latest USA budget has yet another banker bailout covering any banking derivative losses (massive with the plunge in oil prices).


    Hey ... this time the Congress Critters give the green light to take your pensions and loot your savings and checking accounts.


    Hmmm ...


    Any wonder why the Chicago Federal Reserve is covering all ground level windows with bricks???


    Hmmm???


    Any wonder why they have been sending out "prepper packages" to bank managers???


    Hello????


    Oh yes ... about those several days of planeloads of US high tech military hardware into the Ukraine (never mind there is no way for them to pay for it ...) ...


    ... do the math peeps ...


    (sorry for the rant ...)

  4. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Calz For This Useful Post:

    dianna (18th December 2014), jimmer (16th December 2014), PurpleLama (16th December 2014), Ria (16th December 2014), sandy (16th December 2014), Spiral (16th December 2014)

  5. #3
    Retired Member
    Join Date
    13th September 2013
    Location
    Rockies Foothills
    Posts
    4,982
    Thanks
    9,075
    Thanked 18,116 Times in 3,777 Posts
    why go to war with russia as their economy craters, again?

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-1...uble-rout.html

  6. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to jimmer For This Useful Post:

    Calz (16th December 2014), Ria (16th December 2014), sandy (16th December 2014), Spiral (16th December 2014)

  7. #4
    Retired Member
    Join Date
    13th September 2013
    Posts
    1,380
    Thanks
    8,603
    Thanked 8,070 Times in 1,329 Posts
    Why go to war with Russia ... or anyone ... regardless???

    Clearly the currency game is afoot ...

    War has several faces ...

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Calz For This Useful Post:

    Ria (16th December 2014), sandy (16th December 2014), Spiral (16th December 2014)

  9. #5
    Retired Member
    Join Date
    13th September 2013
    Posts
    1,380
    Thanks
    8,603
    Thanked 8,070 Times in 1,329 Posts
    You don't suppose this may have something to do with it???

    Nah ...






  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Calz For This Useful Post:

    Ria (18th December 2014)

  11. #6
    Retired Member
    Join Date
    13th September 2013
    Posts
    1,380
    Thanks
    8,603
    Thanked 8,070 Times in 1,329 Posts
    No idea how to vet this information ... posted on SOTT ... for your discernment.

    ___________________________


    World War III scenario: NATO begins soft invasion of Donbass


    Alexey Zoteev
    Fort Russ
    Thu, 18 Dec 2014 01:33 CET


    Another ceasefire in Donbass for the first time in many months is without the artillery cannonade. Peaceful cities again became peaceful. Machine gun bursts and single shots from small arms don't count. Ukrainian troops folded their heavy rocket artillery and are performing a rotation. Battered units of UAF are being replaced by fresh troops. This is where the fun begins.

    One of my friends got a call from a friend living in a prosperous European country and hysterically reported that the husband of her relative, a soldier of one of the divisions of NATO, was sent to Ukraine, changed into Ukrainian uniform and delivered to the location of Donetsk airport. She also reported that according to this soldier, almost all who, under the pretext of rotation, comes to the airport - are Europeans and Americans. NATO troops are taking this strategic object under their control.

    Also, during the conversation, the reason for the closure of the three largest airports of Ukraine - Zaporozhzhye, Kharkov and Dnepropetrovsk became clear. NATO transport aircraft landed on the runways of these airports, and unloaded military equipment, military units and ammunition. Confirmation of the delivery to Eastern Ukraine of "help" from NATO I also received from other sources - local residents in these cities confirmed that they had seen European and American equipment on the territory of the flight terminals. NATO began a soft invasion of Donbass. Dressed in Ukrainian uniform European and American military are taking up key positions on the front lines.

    What can all this mean? Why should a party which is interested in a ceasefire remove their own units and replace them with soldiers, whose birthplace is far away from this place? It is not difficult to answer this question. To speculate that the well-trained fighters of NATO will be able to more efficiently contain the onslaught of the militia is stupid, because the advantage in manpower, equipment and supplies is clearly on the side of the units of the Ukrainian armed forces. Accordingly, NATO units, taking the leading positions, have a different task. In my opinion, it is these men who will provoke a conflict, which in the future is destined to grow into a full-scale military operation involving NATO troops. The desire to drag Russia into a global war may very soon bring terrible results. A war with participation of Russian troops and NATO troops very quickly may step outside Ukraine's boundaries and continue either in Russia or the European Union. This course of events, is good only for one country - USA. Mainland power will gladly engage in a global conflict, provided that it takes place on another continent and does not threaten the infrastructure of America. Separated by an ocean, America will avoid ground operations and the maximum that she faces are single air and missile strikes, which the missile defense system is able to cope with. Europe and Russia will suffer more - ground operation will inevitably lead to the destruction of settlements and partial disruption of communications and infrastructure. The question of the start date of WWIII, which will draw into its millstones most countries of our planet is decided today in Donbass, and in particular on the territory of Donetsk airport terminal. And it will be started by those NATO soldiers, which were changed into the Ukrainian uniform and sent to the positions in far away Donetsk.

    The world, in a framework in which it existed until today, will soon disappear. Mired in economic and political problems America is interested in a protracted military conflict taking place on territory, other then its own. Europe is not able to resist the will of its senior strategic partner. Russia will not abandon Novorossia. Whoever wrote this bloody scenario, correctly calculated everything. If all goes according to plan, the upcoming year 2015 will be the last for many in Europe and America, and Russia. Not to mention Ukraine - tens of thousands of its citizens are already buried in a damp ground. We can only rely on the prudence of Western politicians. Today in their hands is the fate of the whole world, which they recklessly gave to the discretion of dressed in Ukrainian uniform commandos.

    People often ask me - how long will the ceasefire last and what will be the result? My opinion - the ceasefire will not last long. The Ukrainian side is not interested in the loss of the territories that they consider to be theirs. Militias want to return to their homes, left behind in Kramatorsk, Slavyansk, Lisichansk, Severodonetsk and Mariupol. And this is the motivation used by Western military analysts who with the force of their units will provoke a new round of escalation of the conflict, which will further give an excuse for "strategic partners" of Ukraine to join the conflict. As one militiaman told me, a prisoner, he questioned, caught the other day, a commanders of the UAF, named the approximate date of commencement of a full-scale offensive - December 20, 2014. I understand that this date is not accurate, I want it to be a mistake. I hope that this does not happen. But just my desire is not enough, especially not enough to stop the inevitable impending WWIII. We will hold on. No matter what happens, we have to be strong and remember - in our unity is strength and victory!


    http://www.sott.net/article/290285-W...ion-of-Donbass

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Calz For This Useful Post:

    Ria (18th December 2014)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •