Page 19 of 20 FirstFirst ... 91617181920 LastLast
Results 271 to 285 of 297

Thread: The General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis: An Alternative for the Star Sciences

  1. #271
    Retired Member United States
    Join Date
    20th July 2014
    Location
    Cape Canaveral, FL
    Posts
    246
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked 893 Times in 224 Posts
    The youtube channel has 203,161 minutes watched, 81,567 views, 265 subscribers. The main paper has 3143 views.

    So much more work to do yet!!

  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Jeffrey W. For This Useful Post:

    Dreamtimer (28th September 2017), Elen (28th September 2017), fourty-two (29th September 2017), Kathy (21st December 2017), sandy (29th September 2017)

  3. #272
    Retired Member United States
    Join Date
    20th July 2014
    Location
    Cape Canaveral, FL
    Posts
    246
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked 893 Times in 224 Posts

  4. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Jeffrey W. For This Useful Post:

    Dreamtimer (29th September 2017), Elen (29th September 2017), fourty-two (29th September 2017), Kathy (21st December 2017), sandy (29th September 2017)

  5. #273
    Retired Member United States
    Join Date
    20th July 2014
    Location
    Cape Canaveral, FL
    Posts
    246
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked 893 Times in 224 Posts

  6. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Jeffrey W. For This Useful Post:

    Dreamtimer (11th October 2017), Elen (11th October 2017), Kathy (21st December 2017), sandy (12th October 2017)

  7. #274
    Retired Member United States
    Join Date
    20th July 2014
    Location
    Cape Canaveral, FL
    Posts
    246
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked 893 Times in 224 Posts

    Do Stars Evolve in Electric Universe?


  8. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Jeffrey W. For This Useful Post:

    Dreamtimer (23rd October 2017), Elen (23rd October 2017), Kathy (21st December 2017), sandy (24th October 2017)

  9. #275
    Retired Member United States
    Join Date
    20th July 2014
    Location
    Cape Canaveral, FL
    Posts
    246
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked 893 Times in 224 Posts
    the book pre-printhttp://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0206v1.pdf It is a PDF.

  10. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Jeffrey W. For This Useful Post:

    Dreamtimer (9th November 2017), Elen (10th November 2017), fourty-two (10th November 2017), Kathy (21st December 2017), sandy (10th November 2017)

  11. #276
    Retired Member
    Join Date
    22nd September 2013
    Posts
    1,141
    Thanks
    15,854
    Thanked 7,406 Times in 1,137 Posts
    Looks pretty comprehensive Jeffrey. Reading the preface made me chuckle and wonder how many academics will get through it without tossing it in the garbage. You hit many a nail on the head when it comes to Scientists, Univerities and Accreditation processes.

    You are a Discoverer, that is for sure...wishing you much energy and inspiration to stay on the path...
    Last edited by sandy, 10th November 2017 at 03:31. Reason: double post?

  12. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to sandy For This Useful Post:

    Dreamtimer (10th November 2017), Elen (10th November 2017), fourty-two (10th November 2017), Kathy (21st December 2017)

  13. #277
    Retired Member United States
    Join Date
    20th July 2014
    Location
    Cape Canaveral, FL
    Posts
    246
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked 893 Times in 224 Posts
    Quote Originally posted by sandy View Post
    Looks pretty comprehensive Jeffrey. Reading the preface made me chuckle and wonder how many academics will get through it without tossing it in the garbage. You hit many a nail on the head when it comes to Scientists, Univerities and Accreditation processes.

    You are a Discoverer, that is for sure...wishing you much energy and inspiration to stay on the path...
    Yea, it is a struggle for sure. Not joining the academic community is by far the greatest decision I have ever made with regards to developing science.

    Academics paralyze themselves by joining larger groups that sacrifice the needs of the individual for the greater group. It is collectivist mentality on small scales, versus my free range, Wild West spirit. It is the freedom vs. security argument. With lots of security and a steady paycheck you have to sacrifice your creative freedom to challenge the dogma. I have chosen to sacrifice my security for creative freedom. I am the opposite of a career academic in terms of freedom of thought and action. It is very, very interesting to experience the dichotomy first hand.

  14. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jeffrey W. For This Useful Post:

    Dreamtimer (13th November 2017), Elen (11th November 2017), sandy (11th November 2017)

  15. #278
    Retired Member United States
    Join Date
    7th April 2015
    Location
    Patapsco Valley
    Posts
    14,610
    Thanks
    70,673
    Thanked 62,025 Times in 14,520 Posts
    Can you get any scientists to even listen to you? Perhaps on the cutting edge?

    Kudos to you and good work. Very interesting stuff.

  16. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dreamtimer For This Useful Post:

    Elen (13th November 2017), Kathy (21st December 2017), sandy (14th November 2017)

  17. #279
    Retired Member United States
    Join Date
    20th July 2014
    Location
    Cape Canaveral, FL
    Posts
    246
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked 893 Times in 224 Posts
    Quote Originally posted by Dreamtimer View Post
    Can you get any scientists to even listen to you? Perhaps on the cutting edge?

    Kudos to you and good work. Very interesting stuff.
    No. They all ignore me. I was introduced to two myths that people don't realize are believed. The first myth is that scientists would recognize great work when they see it (they don't, they would ridicule it and say its wrong, which comes after ignoring it naturally). The second myth is that scientists would not only recognize the great work, they would help it get recognition (they don't, they would actively fight its progression and development).

    There are so many myths about how science is done and its all getting aired out due to the internet's powerful connectivity. Thank you by the way. I have done lots of work, and now others are doing work on it too. Here is a new short paper by D. Archer.

    http://vixra.org/abs/1711.0282

  18. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Jeffrey W. For This Useful Post:

    Dreamtimer (13th November 2017), Elen (13th November 2017), Kathy (21st December 2017), Lemual (6th January 2018), sandy (14th November 2017)

  19. #280
    Retired Member United States
    Join Date
    20th July 2014
    Location
    Cape Canaveral, FL
    Posts
    246
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked 893 Times in 224 Posts
    Another paper by D. Archer concerning the star's classification:

    http://vixra.org/pdf/1712.0460v1.pdf

  20. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Jeffrey W. For This Useful Post:

    Dreamtimer (21st December 2017), Elen (21st December 2017), Kathy (21st December 2017), sandy (22nd December 2017)

  21. #281
    Retired Member United States
    Join Date
    20th July 2014
    Location
    Cape Canaveral, FL
    Posts
    246
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked 893 Times in 224 Posts
    The youtube channel has 230,185 minutes watched, 94,108 views, 307 subscribers. The main paper has 3222 views, the book as it stands has 204 views.

    I will continue to work on it as the new data rolls in.

  22. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Jeffrey W. For This Useful Post:

    Dreamtimer (4th January 2018), Elen (7th January 2018), Kathy (9th January 2018), sandy (5th January 2018)

  23. #282
    Retired Member
    Join Date
    24th November 2015
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    108
    Thanks
    242
    Thanked 692 Times in 109 Posts
    Quote Originally posted by Jeffrey W. View Post
    No. They all ignore me. I was introduced to two myths that people don't realize are believed. The first myth is that scientists would recognize great work when they see it (they don't, they would ridicule it and say its wrong, which comes after ignoring it naturally). The second myth is that scientists would not only recognize the great work, they would help it get recognition (they don't, they would actively fight its progression and development).

    There are so many myths about how science is done and its all getting aired out due to the internet's powerful connectivity. Thank you by the way. I have done lots of work, and now others are doing work on it too. Here is a new short paper by D. Archer.

    http://vixra.org/abs/1711.0282
    Different field but this may be pertinent:

    http://steve-patterson.com/ep-26-im-not-academia/

    I find a lot of Steve's stuff very interesting, though the general focus is Philosophy.

  24. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Lemual For This Useful Post:

    Dreamtimer (6th January 2018), Elen (7th January 2018), Kathy (9th January 2018)

  25. #283
    Retired Member United States
    Join Date
    20th July 2014
    Location
    Cape Canaveral, FL
    Posts
    246
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked 893 Times in 224 Posts
    Quote Originally posted by Lemual View Post
    Different field but this may be pertinent:

    http://steve-patterson.com/ep-26-im-not-academia/

    I find a lot of Steve's stuff very interesting, though the general focus is Philosophy.
    Thank you! I will watch!

    Here is a talk on GJ 436b. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FdmhIyWKf90

  26. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Jeffrey W. For This Useful Post:

    Dreamtimer (6th January 2018), Elen (7th January 2018), Kathy (9th January 2018), Lemual (6th January 2018)

  27. #284
    Retired Member United States
    Join Date
    20th July 2014
    Location
    Cape Canaveral, FL
    Posts
    246
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked 893 Times in 224 Posts
    Quote Originally posted by Lemual View Post
    Different field but this may be pertinent:

    http://steve-patterson.com/ep-26-im-not-academia/

    I find a lot of Steve's stuff very interesting, though the general focus is Philosophy.
    Yep. Its spot on. Academia is some sort of group think hive mind that rejects all ideas that do not conform to the accepted assumptions. Once you question their assumptions you become the "crank" or "crackpot" or "pseudoscientist".

    I'm also saying that for over 2000 years scientists and philosophers have had it mistaken. Stars and planets... they are not different objects. They are the same, only in different stages to their evolution. All of academia in astrophysics and astronomy and all the researchers on the Earth are wrong.

    Stellar evolution is planet formation. Planets are evolving/evolved or dead stars, or the reverse, stars are young, hot and big exoplanets.

    It is going to be wild seeing all this go down over the next couple years. It literally means they never knew the basics of astrophysics, ever.

  28. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Jeffrey W. For This Useful Post:

    Dreamtimer (6th January 2018), Elen (7th January 2018), Kathy (9th January 2018), Lemual (6th January 2018)

  29. #285
    Retired Member United States
    Join Date
    7th April 2015
    Location
    Patapsco Valley
    Posts
    14,610
    Thanks
    70,673
    Thanked 62,025 Times in 14,520 Posts
    Thanks for that link, Lemual. Was reading about the importance of tautologies, didn't think I'd be doing that.

  30. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dreamtimer For This Useful Post:

    Elen (7th January 2018), Kathy (9th January 2018), Lemual (6th January 2018)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •