BRICS Announce $100 Billion Reserve To Bypass Fed, Developed World Central Banks

**modwiz** · 22nd February 2015, 19:43

Originally posted by Elbie

i don't dislike the idea at all. i would still argue that in such organisation the society would become stratified or sanitised. pathogens/psycho sickos would need to be cut off literally.

it would seamlessly fit Us society, not Eu where guns carrying was/is not on the cards . unless you wanna go illlegal.

The "legal", not Law, system is another abomination that needs to go. Laws are for tyrants and morons. Sovereign beings sort it out amongst themselves. Hygiene has deep meaning to a sovereign society/organism. Cleaning and keeping clean are all part of the vigilance of freedom.

**Elbie** · 22nd February 2015, 20:23

Originally posted by modwiz

The "legal", not Law, system is another abomination that needs to go. Laws are for tyrants and morons. Sovereign beings sort it out amongst themselves. Hygiene has deep meaning to a sovereign society/organism. Cleaning and keeping clean are all part of the vigilance of freedom.

i would say legal versus lawful.. it's perfectly justifiable to go lawful and protect your life and livelihood..legal stuff is for the scum i know who's inetersted in finding loopholes to appear squeeky clean and continue to plunder.

the reason why i like BRICs initiative is because is 'live an dlet live' in practice.. if you like petrodollar, go use it, while we do things our way. it's a natural evolution rather than revolution. i for one would hate to see any blood spilled.

the more the better.

**NANUXII** · 23rd February 2015, 02:08

she sounds like someone id want to look after my bank , " Elvira Nabiullina " .. hmmm

**NANUXII** · 23rd February 2015, 02:12

Originally posted by modwiz

The "legal", not Law, system is another abomination that needs to go. Laws are for tyrants and morons. Sovereign beings sort it out amongst themselves. Hygiene has deep meaning to a sovereign society/organism. Cleaning and keeping clean are all part of the vigilance of freedom.

Go Mod, Goooo !

**BabaRa** · 23rd February 2015, 05:41

Never knew a farmer who didn't have a gun, Elbie
But . . . that's another issue.
.
I was thinking more in terms of what is worth what. My quote was more in line with: Why do we believe gold is worth more than silver, or quartz or seashells, rather than putting value on things that we can do something with.

I compare it to: Why is the Mona Lisa highly valued and the copies of the Mona Lisa that it takes experts to detect, not highly valued.

I suspect the "waking up process" requires that we don't rely on others to tell us what is valuable or not. I have seen pictures in modern museums that almost anyone could paint that have price tags on them of thousands of dollars. Who decides? It seems from an historical perspective that there was a reason that gold was considered valuable, but I can't see that the reason exists any longer.

Paper money would work just fine IF we got rid of the Central Banks who turned it into a money-making scheme for their own benefit. As long as the Central Banks charge us for printing $$, it won't matter if the $$ are backed by gold or not. It will remain the same debt creator for the citizens.