Sasquatch Vocalizations 3.0

[jimmer]

Sasquatch Sonogram?? The Ultimate Dimensional Ultrasound??
Just food for thought...I thought they looked similar.

by jove, samos, you may be on to something.
the image quality, lighting and chroma -- but how does a
stock point and click cannon shoot an ultrasound image?
really interesting stuff going on...

btw, mike says hi to all BV2ers:
I always appreciate the positive outlook you guys have towards this
and always appreciate your support.
Thank you.

[samos]

Hi jimmer,

Frances has me thinking....
Maybe they don't actually have to handle the camera at all. Just superimpose an image through some other ability...sound/mind, etc. ?
That would make it much more simpler to assure 'blobsquatch' or not-too-revealing imagery. A perfect purposeful, blurry, confusing picture, every time !

[jimmer]

Hi jimmer,

Frances has me thinking....
Maybe they don't actually have to handle the camera at all. Just superimpose an image through some other ability...sound/mind, etc. ?
That would make it much more simpler to assure 'blobsquatch' or not-too-revealing imagery. A perfect purposeful, blurry, confusing picture, every time !

keep that thought in your BV2 kit bag for future reference.
but for now, as mike likes to say nonchalantly, 'who knows.' ; )

for me, it's becoming easier for all these theories and connections
we're running into to be exquisite obsessions (joyous as they are).
at times I need to remind myself to slow down, plants the stuff in memory,
post it and wait for more evidence to unfold as coincidences and similarities and new knowledge begin to link up.
like a problem that need solving, one day you wake up from your churning dreams -- and you've got it.
that day will surely come for this incredible subject.

sorry for the introspection, but these last few days have been a real mind bender.
we're all experiencing something really, really big.
patience be kind.

what fun it all is.

[jsb_swampfox]

keep that thought in your BV2 kit bag for future reference.
but for now, as mike likes to say nonchalantly, 'who knows.' ; )

for me, it's becoming easier for all these theories and connections
we're running into to be exquisite obsessions (joyous as they are).
at times I need to remind myself to slow down, plants the stuff in memory,
post it and wait for more evidence to unfold as coincidences and similarities and new knowledge begin to link up.
like a problem that need solving, one day you wake up from your churning dreams -- and you've got it.
that day will surely come for this incredible subject.

sorry for the introspection, but these last few days have been a real mind bender.
we're all experiencing something really, really big.
patience be kind.

what fun it all is.

It's a pleasure to be on this ride with you all. Jeff

[samos]

Yes, well, I hope that answer will be something we are comfortable with....

[samos]

It's a pleasure to be on this ride with you all. Jeff

Definitely, same here, Jeff !!

[jimmer]

It's a pleasure to be on this ride with you all. Jeff
Yes, well, I hope that answer will be something we are comfortable with. samos

gitty up and head 'em on out!

and w-h-o k-n-o-w-s, but at least we'll be there as it unfolds.
pretty wild stuff. ; )

see ya tomorrow, guys.

[Frances]

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bfb6RqRpzYM


Mike has re-posted his video.
Truth Of A Legend.
Frances.

The comments section of Mike's youtube channel is not operational at the moment for this video.

[jimmer]

Mike has re-posted his video.
Truth Of A Legend.
Frances.

hello and thanks, frances.
what do you know, all the comments are gone : /
a total restart.

[jimmer]

Hello Jimmer, good shot of what I was looking at on the video.
I viewed it as some mythical Pan of the forest.

Am I being enchanted by this realm?
I am certainly looking at something that was taken by a point and shoot camera.
Maybe that's why Mike won't expose what he really thinks.

The white furry creature that looks like a rabbit, but is not a rabbit, may have something to do with it.
I think what you have highlighted is what Mike is keeping quiet about.
Frances.

with the reposted video, it can be told, it wasn't this image (above).
it was another of the seemingly benign realm images,
posted here from mike's original video edit that caused the controversy.
there is something in that image that is too big or too revealing to release at this time.
change of heart or something else?
mike will reintroduce that image and it's context (presumedly) at a later date.
what intrigue...

mike requested that a specific image be removed from here and here and here, as well as our personal
photobucket accounts. of course, frances and I complied asap:

http://jandeane81.com/threads/317-Bi...ll=1#post20531

http://jandeane81.com/threads/317-Bi...ll=1#post20547

http://jandeane81.com/threads/317-Bi...ll=1#post21071

[samos]

I missed the boat on that one.... hadn't had time to capture any screen shots other than the ' ultrasound' picture. it could have been something as simple as the owners glyph being revealed in that picture too. who knows?.... that's strictly subjective at this time :-)

[jimmer]

I missed the boat on that one.... hadn't had time to capture any screen shots other than the ' ultrasound' picture. it could have been something as simple as the owners glyph being revealed in that picture too. who knows?.... that's strictly subjective at this time :-)

I think you are on to something, samos.

at this time, as always, we need to respect mike's wishes,
as obscure as they are at times.
this seems to be a time that mike has been waiting
for and he doesn't want to blow it or be too
revealing or public about certain aspects at this time.

he is riding the wave. hanging ten.

[jimmer]

from mike's recent YT comment:

Sorry I pulled the pic for a later date.
I did see an interesting thought I think mentioned by Frances on your site
about maybe the camera not even being utilized at all but rather the images
just appearing on there or something to that extent.
I don't know if you're familiar with the Scole Experiment, a 5 year scientific study into the paranormal.
There was a point when they were capturing images on film, even to the point where the film
was in a locked box and not even inside a camera.
It leaves one wondering if they're even taking the cameras or just imposing the images on them. 

here's the Scole Experiment facebook page.

and the website, including several articles.

and an apology for my 'who knows' attitude late in my day, yesterday.
my mind was weary : )

[Frances]

Thanks Mike and Jimmer. I was thinking of the Scoles Experiment when Samos brought up the ultrasound theory.
It's a good one, and the fact that images can be superimposed on to film even though the film was not handled by the researchers.
The experiments were all done under controlled conditions.
Frances.

[jimmer]

from mitch, back from the Show Low research.

analysis of a photo yields something previously unseen.

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukWxJELX4uk