Sasquatch Vocalizations 3.0

[jimmer]

You are prob right Jimmer, This is so mind blowing I really dont know what direction to look for answers. Everyone here has put forth a good possible explanation of the photos.

mike seems to be in the same boat.
like mike, we need to allow this ship to meander down this stream, bumpy as it is.
we may not know the course, but the waters are cool and weird.
enjoy the ride. that is all.

[jimmer]

I see the brow ridge.
Both eyes.
Nose and nostrils.
Lips.
Open mouth.

In my view I am looking at a Sasquatch face.
Frances.

hold on tight, frances, we're experience some turbulence ; )

[jsb_swampfox]

I see the brow ridge.
Both eyes.
Nose and nostrils.
Lips.
Open mouth.

In my view I am looking at a Sasquatch face.
Frances.

I see it now. Frances, you have a good eye ...Thanks, Jeff

[jimmer]

I see the brow ridge.
Both eyes.
Nose and nostrils.
Lips.
Open mouth.

In my view I am looking at a Sasquatch face.
Frances.

is that brown tongue shape the mouth that you are seeing?

[Frances]

I see a blue eye with a dark pupil on left side.
I see the other eye but it is not so defined as the left one.
The nose with shaded areas where the nostrils will be.
The mouth is open and it now looks to me that there is a fang, white pointed coming down from the upper, inside of mouth.
Frances.

[jimmer]

I see a blue eye with a dark pupil on left side.
I see the other eye but it is not so defined as the left one.
The nose with shaded areas where the nostrils will be.
The mouth is open and it now looks to me that there is a fang, white pointed coming down from the upper, inside of mouth.
Frances.

what is that large, well defined lighter tan area that I think to be a tongue?

[Frances]

The inside of the mouth. Can you see the fang?

Can you see the blue eye?

[Frances]

[Frances]

I have just been doing some contrast photos and decided to post them.
They are the screen shots from Truth Of A Legend.
Frances.

[jimmer]

The inside of the mouth. Can you see the fang?

Can you see the blue eye?

well, frances, Idon'tseeit.
the lack of a head shape, contour or
any face shape definition is what's holding me back.

you know I luv ya, but have you heard of this term:

Pareidolia
(parr-i-doh-lee-ə) is a psychological phenomenon involving a vague and random stimulus
(often an image or sound) being perceived as significant, a form of apophenia.
Common examples include seeing images of animals or faces in clouds,
the man in the moon or the Moon rabbit, and hearing hidden messages on records when played in reverse.

while we are all in the leap-of-faith,
we (I) need to be careful not to take unwarranted tumbles.

I know, wonder what mike thinks about this?
PM him with a link to our image theories?
is it a tongue or is it a face or are we both off?
he may have already figured it out.
after all, he's got the original digital files
that may provide more detail, clarity.

I'm really impressed and happy to see your photo manipulations.
really brings out obscured detail, texture and mass.
now we can really dig into to this stuff.

big picture we can all decipher -- this is a blast.

[Frances]

I know Jimmer, I have heard of Pareidolia, me thinks I have it!
I will keep at it until I get it straight and true.
Frances.

[jimmer]

I know Jimmer, I have heard of Pareidolia, me thinks I have it!
I will keep at it until I get it straight and true.
Frances.

with this subject we're dealing with, and I bet mike would concur,
the 'straight and true' is a very messy affair. mike's 'I ate the apple'
short story tells how he's now approaching it all -- he's there, aware and
taking it all in stride -- not over thinking or straining on the incomprehensible.
gathering information and experiences, forgetting nothing, forming opinions,
letting it flow as this new paradigm takes shape.

so, let's keep on the watch -- digging, thinking, accumulating.

as for finding that 'mid-stride' sas in the realm images,
mike offers more obscure hints:

Sasquatch Ontario14 hours ago
Don't confuse what I said with "in mid stride".
That was the big guy in the photo who shows movement in the three pics.
He's in mid stride.
There's something else going on but I'm not pointing it out.
Compare.

so, in that realm images montage, there's something else going on,
something mike refuses to point out. any ideas?

[Tonz]

I can see all that is suggested in the the photo ,but i also can see many more things and perspectives of the blurred shot, thanks to that blurreyness we can see what ever our minds allow us to see.the mind must have a perspective if not it will adapt.

was the photo from a set up movement censored camera with a flash?.
if it was the sas it was inches away from the camera and would have been fairly anoid at that sudden flash.

.

[jimmer]

I can see all that is suggested in the the photo ,but i also can see many more things and perspectives of the blurred shot, thanks to that blurreyness we can see what ever our minds allow us to see.the mind must have a perspective if not it will adapt.

was the photo from a set up movement censored camera with a flash?.
if it was the sas it was inches away from the camera and would have been fairly anoid at that sudden flash.

.

mike found that image, along with the others, on his camera.
the sas took it. it's pretty incredible, but that's what we have.

[jimmer]

I revisited mike's latest 'realm' shots and noticed
something really odd, bizarre: each photo was taken with
different camera exposure settings -- 1/15, 1/30, 1/60 of a second.
not sure what to make of this. could the 'photographer' be so
sophisticated to manipulate these sensitive exposure settings?
that would take a human level of dexterity.

btw: YT has just upgraded the 'large player' size.
if you haven't seen this yet, check it out.