|
-
17th January 2015, 17:18
#46
Relationship anarchy questions the conventions of love relationships and the idea that “love” is only real when two people exclude others in its expression. It presents a paradigm where love towards one does not diminish love towards another, and that there are many definitions to this concept.
When it comes to the idea of “love” “sex” and “relationships” we, as a species, are truly sleepwalking. We spin our wheels in a repressive social structure of eros, but it seems, when looking around, that the lack of visionary freedom most people allow themselves has led to a wasteland of apocalyptical ruin between the sexes.
It seems like the sexual revolution was something “the people” were not ready to embrace. Or maybe the actual problem lies in the idea that we do not need cultural “revolution” as much as we need spiritual “revelation”. Revolutions are still hidden behind masks, dogmas and institutions. Revelations come directly from our divine source; a source that has unimaginable expressions of itself.
Everywhere evident, after some time, relationships will either “break apart” or “lose their spark”. If love is not wrong, then it should be considered that our social standards are flawed. We need to seriously rethink our outdated idea of “fidelity” and how it exiles us from what might be necessary for our soul, our sense of wholeness; exiles us from so many interesting and beautiful people we may want to experience, past conventional rules. The universe is dynamic; it does not keep itself on a choke-chain to maintain its status quo. If humanity wants to release it full potential, then it will have to liberate and acknowledge its tremendous sexual drive.
The “liberation” of eros will never happen until we get rid of contracts, vows and bans. There can be no more bargaining. The idea of “love” cannot depend on the condition that desire for others must be completely snuffed out. Renouncing the pleasure and company of others, to show devotion to one, is farcical, if not an extremely masochistic concept. Love is either built on trust and truth, or perishes because it is built on sand.
Relationship anarchy allows for expressions of love in an atmosphere of general lawlessness, like the definition of anarchy suggests, without common standards or purpose. Love’s “secret requirements” need to be replaced with the thrill of the unknown; a mirror for divine reflection. Relationship anarchy allows the true genius of the universe, and its extraordinary, infinite expressions of love to surprise us.
-
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to dianna For This Useful Post:
modwiz (17th January 2015), Ria (17th January 2015), Tonz (30th April 2015)
-
17th January 2015, 17:27
#47