Rumble Channel The HighWire with Del Bigtree

[Lord Sidious]

You need to listen to your own posts.

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

[modwiz]

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

This is one of the longest posts I've seen from you for awhile.

[Lord Sidious]

This is one of the longest posts I've seen from you for awhile.

Yeah, well, you know how it is.................

[WantDisclosure]

Posted 1 day ago:

The HighWire with Del Bigtree

British broadcasting veteran Mark Sharman joins Del to expose the chilling blueprint behind his explosive new documentary, The Agenda: Their Vision. Your Future. From AI surveillance and digital IDs to the war on farmers and the collapse of national sovereignty, Sharman lays bare the global power grab already underway—and what it means for your future.


Source: https://rumble.com/v/v6s7lij

[WantDisclosure]

First, an explanation of two acronyms:

ACIP = Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices
ICAN = Informed Consent Action Network

Streamed on June 12, 2025, this episode takes place at FreedomFest 2025 in Palm Springs, California.

The program begins @ 4:34:

The HighWire with Del Bigtree

RFK Jr. just retired the entire 17-member ACIP panel—marking an unprecedented reset in U.S. vaccine policy. With figures like Dr. Robert Malone stepping in, what does this mean for the future of public health?

Jefferey Jaxen investigates the White House’s new partnership with Palantir, a data giant with deep military ties, as AI rapidly merges with government power. Plus, fresh warnings about new coronaviruses “ready to jump” to humans.

ICAN lead attorney Aaron Siri breaks down the legal and cultural implications of the ACIP overhaul. And FOX News host Kennedy joins Del Bigtree for a no-holds-barred discussion on media censorship, mass protests, and RFK Jr.’s reshaping of the health landscape.

Guests: Aaron Siri, Esq, Jefferey Jaxen, Lisa Kennedy


Source: https://rumble.com/v/v6shtcv

[WantDisclosure]

Streamed on June 12, 2025, this episode takes place at FreedomFest 2025 in Palm Springs, California.

Del Bigtree describes this as a libertarian conference.

libertarian

1. One who advocates maximizing individual rights and minimizing the role of the state.
2. One who believes in free will.

https://www.thefreedictionary.com/libertarian

[Emil El Zapato]

Keep in mind my earlier post regarding emergency medicine protocols

Texas A&M University - A very conservative Texas University with a school tradition of throwing tortillas on the basketball court in home games against my university (which is essentially another piece of dung)

The 1 In 10 U.S. Doctors With Reservations About Vaccines Could Be Undermining The Fight Against COVID-19
Researchers studying vaccine hesitancy found the same factors thought to encourage hesitancy in the general public – like having right-leaning political views – might also motivate physician opposition.

male doctor giving an injection to a female doctor


While the vast majority of primary care providers have higher confidence in vaccines than the general public, some do not.

American attitudes toward scientific expertise have become increasingly contentious in recent years. But many people across the political spectrum still place high levels of trust in their personal physicians. Correspondingly, both popular media and public health officials have encouraged physicians to serve as strong advocates for COVID-19 vaccination.

At the same time, however, there have been several cases of doctors expressing skepticism about vaccines in the media. Though the American Medical Association found that 96% of physicians reported being fully vaccinated against COVID-19 in June 2021, some high-profile physicians have spread misinformation about vaccine safety. Some patients have also reported that their personal physicians discouraged them from getting vaccinated on both medical and non-medical grounds.

One conservative group of doctors called the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons, which counts Republican Senator and ophthalmologist Rand Paul among its members, offers several examples of how some physicians actively promote vaccine skepticism.

Following the 2015 Disneyland measles outbreak, AAPS shared a press release falsely linking the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine to autism in children, a claim based on fraudulent research that the scientific community has widely discredited. The group has also taken legal action to encourage parental noncompliance with childhood vaccine mandates, using misinterpreted data to suggest that COVID-19 vaccines are uniquely dangerous compared to other vaccines.

While groups like AAPS do not represent the views of most physicians, these examples raise an important question: Just how prevalent is physician vaccine hesitancy, and why might some physicians hold negative views toward vaccines?

As political science and health policy researchers studying vaccine hesitancy, we wanted to answer this question. Our recent study found that the same factors thought to encourage hesitancy in the general public – like having right-leaning political views – might also motivate physician opposition to vaccination.

Physician Vaccine Confidence Is A Mixed Bag
In May 2021, we asked 625 primary care physicians nationwide about their general attitudes toward vaccines and whether they believed vaccines are safe, effective and important. We also asked PCPs how much confidence they had in the safety of the Moderna, Pfizer-BioNTech and Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccines, which were each authorized for emergency use in the U.S. at the time. Respondents answered these questions on a scale ranging from “strongly agree” to “strongly disagree.”

We also surveyed potential factors that could influence physician attitudes toward vaccines. These included political ideology, previous infection with COVID-19, religiosity and standard demographics like gender, race, ethnicity and income.

On the surface, our results provide some reassuring news for using physicians as leading vaccine promoters. We found that only 5.2% of PCPs were unvaccinated against COVID at the time of our survey, echoing the findings of the American Medical Association’s June 2021 survey. In addition, our results suggest that PCPs’ views toward vaccines are overwhelmingly positive – 88% of physicians agreed or strongly agreed that vaccines in general are safe. Likewise, 90% of physicians agreed that vaccines are effective, and 89% agreed that vaccines are important. When we compared our PCP responses to responses from the general public on the same questions, we found that PCPs are 19% more likely to strongly agree that vaccines are safe and 16% more likely to strongly agree they’re effective.

Digging deeper into the data, however, reveals some troubling trends. Even if most physicians are well-positioned to serve as vaccination advocates, our results still suggest that 10.1% of PCPs do not agree that vaccines in general are safe. Similarly, 9.3% do not agree that all vaccines are effective, and 8.3% do not agree that they are important.

PCP political leanings and previous health experiences may help explain why some hold negative views toward vaccination. We found that politically conservative PCPs and those who previously contracted COVID-19 were 19% less likely to believe that vaccines in general are safe and effective.

We found similar results when examining confidence in the three COVID-19 vaccines available in the U.S. at the time, a little over six months after the first vaccine was authorized. Approximately 90% of PCPs were either “very confident” or “confident” in the safety of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines. Still, 9.5% and 8.7% lacked confidence in the safety of the Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines, respectively. Only 68% of physicians expressed confidence in the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, likely due to reports of its relatively lesser effectiveness at the time.

Why This Matters
Our research finds that physician vaccine hesitancy is more prevalent than vaccination campaigns may have assumed. Vaccine hesitancy among physicians is also likely motivated by the same factors that encourage hesitancy in the general public. This potentially poses a problem for vaccination efforts that rely on physicians to promote vaccine uptake.

Nevertheless, our work offers room for potential optimism and ways to improve vaccine confidence in this group.

Partisanship, for example, plays an important role in shaping vaccine hesitancy. Consequently, tactics shown to improve vaccine attitudes in the general public – such as highlighting GOP politicians with more positive views toward vaccination – could potentially increase support for vaccination among physicians as well. In our view, studying ways to encourage vaccine enthusiasm among PCPs could help “move the needle” on vaccine uptake in the U.S.

[WantDisclosure]

ACIP = Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices

Del Bigtree talks about the fact that the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices simply rubber stamps products because they represent corporate interests. He said the vaccine program in the United States is born at ACIP meetings, which he and his organization began attending in 2017.

He said the childhood vaccine schedule in the 1980s had 10 vaccines on it, but after pharma was given protection against getting sued for injuries, the schedule skyrocketed to 72 vaccines.

[Emil El Zapato]

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
Health Resources & Services Administration

INJURY COMPENSATION PROGRAMS
The DICP Submit Portal will be unavailable beginning June 14, 2025 while services are being upgraded. New VICP Submit and CICP Submit Portals will be available by Monday, June 23, 2025. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP)
The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) is a no-fault alternative to the traditional legal system for resolving vaccine injury petitions. The VICP provides compensation for people injured by certain vaccines.

Any individual, of any age, who received a covered vaccine and believe they were injured as a result, can file a petition. Parents, legal guardians and legal representatives can file on behalf of children, disabled adults, and individuals who are deceased.

The Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) was created so that in the unlikely event you have a serious injury from a covered countermeasure, you may be considered for benefits.

The following may be eligible for Program benefits:

The injured countermeasure recipient.
Certain survivor(s) of a deceased injured countermeasure recipient.
The estate of a deceased injured countermeasure recipient.

Vaccines save lives by preventing disease.

Most people who get vaccines have no serious problems. Vaccines, like any medicines, can cause side effects, but most are very rare and very mild. Some health problems that follow vaccinations are not caused by vaccines.

In very rare cases, a vaccine can cause a serious problem, such as a severe allergic reaction.

In these instances, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) may provide financial compensation to individuals who file a petition and are found to have been injured by a VICP-covered vaccine. Even in cases in which such a finding is not made, petitioners may receive compensation through a settlement.

How does the VICP work?
The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is a no-fault alternative to the traditional legal system for resolving vaccine injury petitions.

It was created in the 1980s, after lawsuits against vaccine companies and health care providers threatened to cause vaccine shortages and reduce U.S. vaccination rates, which could have caused a resurgence of vaccine preventable diseases.

Any individual, of any age, who received a covered vaccine and believes he or she was injured as a result, can file a petition. Parents, legal guardians and legal representatives can file on behalf of children, disabled adults, and individuals who are deceased.

[WantDisclosure]

A screenshot at 12:13, when a video from an ACIP meeting in February of 2018 was shown, where lack of data is the answer to a question:

Source: https://rumble.com/v/v6shtcv

[Emil El Zapato]

A screenshot at 12:13, when a video from an ACIP meeting in February of 2018 was shown, where lack of data is the answer to a question:

Any thoughts on why political views should permeate the medical field? Strikes me as a totally illogical factor to consider regarding public health & safety. One has to study the personality and even genetics (and epigenetics) to understand the problem.

[WantDisclosure]

A screenshot at 1:01:10, where Jefferey Jaxen and Del Bigtree are discussing how inappropriate it is to subject medical data of U.S. citizens to be used by contractors of the military:

Source: https://rumble.com/v/v6shtcv

[WantDisclosure]

Lisa Kennedy of FOX News comes on @ 1:12:03:


Source: https://rumble.com/v/v6shtcv

[WantDisclosure]

Lisa Kennedy of FOX News comes on @ 1:12:03:


Source: https://rumble.com/v/v6shtcv

Lisa's full name is Lisa Kennedy Montgomery. She is a Romanian American.

There is an organization called Heritage Organization of Romanian Americans (HORA). On their website there is an interview of Kennedy. An excerpt:

Lisa Kennedy Montgomery: I grew up in a loud, very funny house where you had to compete to be heard. I worked at MTV, where the visual component and the aesthetic was very important and satisfying, because it was layered with music and meaning. Just as music was the common language at MTV, news is the common language here. But we consume it in a way that’s much more comfortable, in a language that we understand. It’s the kind of conversation that you have with your friends when you’re having a great dinner.

https://horainamerica.com/2020/10/23...o-go-after-it/