Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 42 of 42

Thread: Scott McKay/PatriotStreetfighter

  1. #31
    Senior Member United States
    Join Date
    3rd April 2017
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    2,070
    Thanks
    1,725
    Thanked 5,975 Times in 1,607 Posts
    Quote Originally posted by Emil El Zapato View Post
    Seems minor but that can be an indicator of more problems with the content...
    You might want to familiarize yourself with the content.

  2. #32
    Senior Member United States
    Join Date
    3rd April 2017
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    2,070
    Thanks
    1,725
    Thanked 5,975 Times in 1,607 Posts

    Scott McKay Speaking Truth 🌞

    A screenshot:



    "Your creator put you here . . . for a reason."


    Source: https://rumble.com/v/v67wmx1

  3. #33
    Senior Member Emil El Zapato's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd April 2017
    Location
    Earth I
    Posts
    12,966
    Thanks
    37,699
    Thanked 43,844 Times in 12,374 Posts
    Quote Originally posted by WantDisclosure View Post
    You might want to familiarize yourself with the content.
    waste of time. I don't tolerate 'mistakes' on published material... unless there is a post indicating an awareness of it and a correction.
    “El revolucionario: te meteré la bota en el culo"

  4. #34
    Senior Member United States
    Join Date
    3rd April 2017
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    2,070
    Thanks
    1,725
    Thanked 5,975 Times in 1,607 Posts
    Scott McKay recommends this book:


  5. #35
    Senior Member Emil El Zapato's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd April 2017
    Location
    Earth I
    Posts
    12,966
    Thanks
    37,699
    Thanked 43,844 Times in 12,374 Posts
    Thanks, but he's off the read list...Evangelical Christians are not Christians, they are fascists in sheep's clothing.
    “El revolucionario: te meteré la bota en el culo"

  6. #36
    Senior Member United States
    Join Date
    3rd April 2017
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    2,070
    Thanks
    1,725
    Thanked 5,975 Times in 1,607 Posts
    Regarding the need for sheriffs across the USA to step up to the plate:


    Source: https://rumble.com/v/v67nx34

  7. #37
    Senior Member Emil El Zapato's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd April 2017
    Location
    Earth I
    Posts
    12,966
    Thanks
    37,699
    Thanked 43,844 Times in 12,374 Posts
    Why do sheriff's need to step up? Not enough people getting shot?
    “El revolucionario: te meteré la bota en el culo"

  8. #38
    Senior Member United States
    Join Date
    3rd April 2017
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    2,070
    Thanks
    1,725
    Thanked 5,975 Times in 1,607 Posts
    Scott McKay interviews an emergency room doctor, and states to the listener that this doctor is also an Ashkenazi Jew, which is a characteristic of another doctor in Scott McKay's personal biography, a doctor who saved McKay's life after a terrible motorcycle crash.

    1.18.25 Patriot Streetfighter w/ Dr. Jay Bernstein, M.D., exposing the Big Pharma Lie Machine

    PatriotStreetfighter


    1 day ago

    Dr. J Bernstein reveals a number of things that transpired in the world of medicine once the CV – 19 Bioweapon was released. He was one of the rare, brave doctors who did the research and stood against what big Pharma was raining down on top of humanity. Natural healing. Also a subspecialty that comes with his own extensive research on how to get the body to heal itself.


    Source: https://rumble.com/v/v68ibyj

  9. #39
    Senior Member United States
    Join Date
    3rd April 2017
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    2,070
    Thanks
    1,725
    Thanked 5,975 Times in 1,607 Posts
    Quote Originally posted by WantDisclosure View Post
    Scott McKay interviews an emergency room doctor, and states to the listener that this doctor is also an Ashkenazi Jew, which is a characteristic of another doctor in Scott McKay's personal biography, a doctor who saved McKay's life after a terrible motorcycle crash.
    The doctor, Dr. J Bernstein, mentions that one of his mentors is Dr. Richard Fleming.

    Here is a screenshot of a book by Dr. Fleming:


  10. #40
    Senior Member Emil El Zapato's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd April 2017
    Location
    Earth I
    Posts
    12,966
    Thanks
    37,699
    Thanked 43,844 Times in 12,374 Posts
    Quote Originally posted by WantDisclosure View Post
    The doctor, Dr. J Bernstein, mentions that one of his mentors is Dr. Richard Fleming.

    Here is a screenshot of a book by Dr. Fleming:
    Here is a screenshot of the end of his useful career. I'm sorry I know it seems I'm picking on you, but I do have a sincere concern about misinformation in the U.S. society. It will cause us to fail miserably for 'psychological' reasons. That's not good, it is what happens in all failed societies. The natives get restless and the rest follows (for many reasons, justified and not justified due to misinformation).

    I. Background

    On April 24, 2009, Dr. Fleming, the president of, and sole physician at, Fleming Heart and Health Institute, P.C. (FHHI), pled guilty to one felony count of healthcare fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1347 and 2, and one felony count of mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1341 and 2. On August 20, 2009, the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska entered a judgment of conviction against Dr. Fleming on these counts and sentenced Dr. Fleming to 5 years of probation. In pleading guilty to those offenses, Dr. Fleming admitted that his convictions stemmed from two separate actions. Dr. Fleming, through his practice at FHHI, performed various imaging studies and submitted reimbursement claims to Medicare and Medicaid. Dr. Fleming's felony healthcare fraud related to the submission of a reimbursement claim. Dr. Fleming admitted to knowingly executing and attempting to execute a scheme to defraud Medicare and Medicaid healthcare benefit programs in connection with the delivery of and payment for healthcare benefits, items, and services, namely by submitting payment claims for tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging studies that he did not actually perform. Dr. Fleming's felony mail fraud violation related to money paid to him to conduct a clinical study of a soy chip food product for the purpose of evaluating health benefits. As Dr. Fleming admitted during his guilty plea, he received approximately $35,000 for conducting a clinical trial, but he fabricated data for certain subjects.

    By letter dated November 18, 2013, pursuant to section 306(b)(2)(B)(ii)(I) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 335a(b)(2)(B)(ii)(I)), FDA's Office of Regulatory Affairs (ORA) notified Dr. Fleming of its proposal to debar him for 10 years based on those convictions. On September 28, 2018, FDA debarred Dr. Fleming for 10 years from providing services in any capacity to a person with an approved or pending drug product application. Following that debarment, Dr. Fleming made various submissions from September 2018 to October 2018, which FDA construed as a petition for reconsideration and denied on November 28, 2018.

    On March 15, 2022, Dr. Fleming applied for termination of debarment pursuant to section 306(d)(1) of the FD&C Act. Absent a conviction reversal, FDA may grant an application to terminate debarment pursuant to section 306(b)(2)(B) only when “termination serves the interests of justice and adequately protects the integrity of the drug approval process” (see section 306(d)(3)(B)).

    By letter dated July 12, 2022, ORA offered Dr. Fleming an opportunity for a hearing under 21 CFR part 12 on a proposal to deny his application for termination of debarment. In the letter, ORA stated that, considering all the favorable and unfavorable information in light of the remedial public health purposes underlying debarment, terminating Dr. Fleming's debarment would not best serve the interests of justice and would not adequately protect the integrity of the drug approval process.

    Under the authority delegated by the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, the Chief Scientist has considered Dr. Fleming's request for a hearing. Hearings are granted only if there is a genuine and substantial issue of fact. Hearings will not be granted on issues of policy or law, on mere allegations, denials, or general descriptions of positions and contentions, or on data and information insufficient to justify the factual determination urged (see § 12.24(b) (21 CFR 12.24(b))).

    The Chief Scientist has considered Dr. Fleming's arguments, as well as the proposal to deny Dr. Fleming's application for termination of debarment and concludes that there is no genuine and substantial issue of fact requiring a hearing. Further, the Chief Scientist finds that Dr. Fleming's application does not satisfy the grounds for terminating debarment.

    II. Arguments

    In his response to ORA's proposal to deny his request for termination, Dr. Fleming concedes that the convictions underlying his debarment pursuant to section 306(b)(2)(B)(ii)(I) of the FD&C Act have not been reversed. FDA could therefore only terminate his debarment under section 306(d)(3)(B) if the Agency determined that such termination would serve the interests of justice and adequately protect the integrity of the drug approval process. In the application to terminate his debarment, Dr. Fleming presented three reasons for terminating his debarment: (1) that he was effectively debarred in the period between when he was convicted of the two felony offenses on which his debarment was based and when FDA finalized his debarment; (2) that he has taken training courses related to billing and ethics; and (3) that he has taken steps to prevent future mistakes in billing and collecting data.

    In proposing to deny Dr. Fleming's application to terminate his debarment, ORA weighed the seriousness and nature of the offenses that led to his debarment, including his culpability, against his statements regarding other mitigating factors. After accounting for his assertions that he had effectively been debarred since his original convictions, ORA found that Dr. Fleming had not established that terminating his debarment would serve the interests of justice or adequately protect the integrity of the drug approval process. In his request for a hearing on ORA's proposal, Dr. Fleming repeats some of the arguments from his application for termination of debarment and provides some additional context related to his own views on drug regulation, the criminal justice system, and other ethical considerations. He further clarifies some of the corrective actions he has implemented with respect to patient billing.

    As a preliminary matter, the Chief Scientist notes Dr. Fleming's request in his application for termination of debarment that FDA consider the time starting from when he was convicted in 2009 as “time served.” Dr. Fleming contended that, because he was convicted in 2009, “the effective period of debarment has been 12+ years.” While Dr. Fleming does not renew this argument in his request for a hearing on ORA's proposal, the timing of when he was convicted, when ORA proposed his debarment, and when FDA finalized his debarment is not in dispute. Notwithstanding his arguments to the contrary, FDA did not debar Dr. Fleming until the Agency issued the final order debarring him in September 2018. Neither his convictions nor ORA's proposal to debar him started his debarment period pursuant to the Agency's authority under section 306(b)(2)(B)(ii)(I) of the FD&C Act. He thus cannot now argue that his ultimate debarment in September 2018 had any effect whatsoever on him before that time. The Chief Scientist therefore agrees with ORA that terminating his debarment on that basis would not serve the interests of justice or adequately protect the integrity of the drug approval process.

    The Chief Scientist further agrees with ORA that Dr. Fleming has not shown that terminating his debarment would serve the interests of justice or adequately protect the drug approval process—even in light of the additional assertions and arguments proffered in support of his hearing request on ORA's proposal. Both offenses underlying his debarment are felony fraud convictions related to the regulation of drugs. As noted in ORA's proposal to deny Dr. Fleming's application for termination, the pattern of fraudulent conduct on which his convictions were based calls into question his ability to comply with the FD&C Act and indicates that he poses a threat to the drug approval process if he were allowed to participate in it. In light of the conduct underlying the convictions on which Dr. Fleming's debarment was based, his assertions that he has taken some courses and adopted corrective measures relative to billing patients and collecting data do not come close to showing that terminating his debarment would serve the interests of justice and adequately protect the drug approval process in the sense contemplated by section 306(d)(3)(B)(ii). Dr. Fleming has thus presented no material factual dispute for a hearing on ORA's proposal to deny the application to terminate his debarment.

    III. Conclusion

    Therefore, the Chief Scientist, under authority delegated to her, denies Dr. Fleming's application for termination of debarment under section 306(d) of the FD&C Act. A hearing on this request is not necessary because there are no genuine and substantial issues of fact (see § 12.24(b)).

    Any person with an approved or pending drug product application who knowingly uses the services of Dr. Fleming, in any capacity during his period of debarment, will be subject to civil money penalties (section 307(a)(6) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 335b(a)(6))). If Dr. Fleming provides services in any capacity to a person with an approved or pending drug product application, he will be subject to civil money penalties (section 307(a)(7) of the FD&C Act). In addition, FDA will not accept or review any abbreviated new drug applications submitted by or with the assistance of Dr. Fleming during his period of debarment (section 306(c)(1)(B) of the FD&C Act).

    Dated: February 22, 2023.

    Namandjé N. Bumpus,

    Chief Scientist.

    [FR Doc. 2023-04003 Filed 2-27-23; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
    “El revolucionario: te meteré la bota en el culo"

  11. #41
    Senior Member Emil El Zapato's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd April 2017
    Location
    Earth I
    Posts
    12,966
    Thanks
    37,699
    Thanked 43,844 Times in 12,374 Posts
    Nature Reviews Psychology

    The psychological causes and societal consequences of authoritarianism

    Danny Osborne, Thomas H. Costello, John Duckitt & Chris G. Sibley
    Nature Reviews Psychology volume 2, pages220–232 (2023)Cite this article


    Abstract
    Over the past two decades, citizens’ political rights and civil liberties have declined globally. Psychological science can play an instrumental role in both explaining and combating the authoritarian impulses that underlie these attacks on personal autonomy. In this Review, we describe the psychological processes and situational factors that foster authoritarianism, as well as the societal consequences of its apparent resurgence within the general population. First, we summarize the dual process motivational model of ideology and prejudice, which suggests that viewing the world as a dangerous, but not necessarily competitive, place plants the psychological seeds of authoritarianism. Next, we discuss the evolutionary, genetic, personality and developmental antecedents to authoritarianism and explain how contextual threats to safety and security activate authoritarian predispositions. After examining the harmful consequences of authoritarianism for intergroup relations and broader societal attitudes, we discuss the need to expand the ideological boundaries of authoritarianism and encourage future research to investigate both right-wing and left-wing variants of authoritarianism.
    “El revolucionario: te meteré la bota en el culo"

  12. #42
    Senior Member United States
    Join Date
    3rd April 2017
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    2,070
    Thanks
    1,725
    Thanked 5,975 Times in 1,607 Posts
    Quote Originally posted by WantDisclosure View Post
    Apparently, Scott McKay does what he does trying to restore the U.S. to Constitutional government because of an epiphany he had regarding his father, who he refers to as "The General."
    Scott and Sasha Stone and Charlie Ward share their thoughts about and plans for the future:


    Source: https://rumble.com/v/v6h3pyv

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •