Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: 44% Of Hospitalisations Boosted Says CDC

  1. #1
    Senior Member Aianawa's Avatar
    Join Date
    18th March 2015
    Posts
    11,247
    Thanks
    41,224
    Thanked 33,582 Times in 9,265 Posts

    44% Of Hospitalisations Boosted Says CDC

    From the CDC comes this data >


  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Aianawa For This Useful Post:

    Silly Wabbit (15th September 2022)

  3. #2
    Senior Member Silly Wabbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    30th June 2019
    Posts
    156
    Thanks
    1,657
    Thanked 712 Times in 156 Posts
    This has been the situation in my neck of the woods as well... Most of those that did not get the shot, did get the illness to varying degrees, and as such, have some natural immunity at this point... Where as those that got the shots, tended to stay home more, and not go around other people, and as a result, are now coming out, and getting their turn in line.

    What is a shock however is that many are surprised to learn they can get sick, even though all along they did suggest the shots do not keep you from either getting it or sharing it... It only helped keep them from ending up in a terminal situation should they get it...

    I do not think this is a reflection that those that got the shots, are in any way worse off as a result of the shots however. Just an observation that they are still getting sick too... The numbers in my area are higher for those that got the shots and the boosters, but at this point, it really doesn't matter... No one seems immune. Which is why the fighting over it, in my opinion was so ridiculous...

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Silly Wabbit For This Useful Post:

    Aianawa (15th September 2022), Wind (15th September 2022)

  5. #3
    Senior Member Aianawa's Avatar
    Join Date
    18th March 2015
    Posts
    11,247
    Thanks
    41,224
    Thanked 33,582 Times in 9,265 Posts
    Have been recieving the fizzer monthly court made to, documents, made understandable by more sciency medical people, putrid indeed and as more comprehend ?, while realllly sad the awakening energies are massive.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Aianawa For This Useful Post:

    Silly Wabbit (23rd September 2022)

  7. #4
    Senior Member Aianawa's Avatar
    Join Date
    18th March 2015
    Posts
    11,247
    Thanks
    41,224
    Thanked 33,582 Times in 9,265 Posts
    Far Out


    Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0hpT00a8xg


    The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the
    COVID-19 pandemic, 14th September 2022
    https://www.thelancet.com/journals/la...

    https://covid19commission.org

    Viral origins

    The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 remains unknown.

    There are two leading hypotheses:

    that the virus emerged as a zoonotic spillover from wildlife or a farm animal,

    possibly through a wet market,

    in a location that is still undetermined;

    or that the virus emerged from a research-related incident,

    during the field collection of viruses,

    or through a laboratory-associated escape.

    No independent, transparent, and science-based investigation has been carried out regarding the bioengineering of SARS-like viruses that was underway before the outbreak of COVID-19.

    The laboratory notebooks, databases, email records, and samples of institutions involved in such research have not been made available to independent researchers.

    Independent researchers have not yet investigated the US laboratories engaged in the laboratory manipulation of SARS-CoV-like viruses,

    nor have they investigated the details of the laboratory research that had been underway in Wuhan.

    US National Institutes of Health (NIH) has resisted disclosing details of the research on SARS-CoV-related viruses that it had been supporting,

    providing extensively redacted information only as required by Freedom of Information Act lawsuits.

    In brief, there are many potential proximal origins of SARS-CoV-2, but there is still a shortfall of independent, scientific, and collaborative work on the issue.

    The search for the origins of the virus requires unbiased, independent, transparent, and rigorous work by international teams in the fields of virology, epidemiology, bioinformatics,

    and other related fields, and supported by all governments.

    In the absence of an unbiased, independent, and rigorous search for a natural origin by a multidisciplinary team of experts alongside an unbiased, independent, and rigorous investigation of the research-related hypotheses,

    the public's trust in science will be imperilled,

    with potentially grave long-term repercussions.

    It is therefore crucial to investigate all hypotheses fully,

    not only to ascertain the source of the pandemic and to protect against future emerging infectious diseases,

    but also to ensure the integrity of science itself.

    The perceived lack of transparency to date by leading scientific agencies and laboratories is troubling and needs to be addressed.

    Strategies to prevent research-related releases should include stronger international and national oversight of biosafety,

    biosecurity, and biorisk management,

    including the strict regulation of gain of function research of concern.

    When investigating the origins of any novel pathogen,

    potential hypotheses should not be prematurely rejected to ensure that time-sensitive data—

    such as early case information and laboratory records—are collected.

    And this 19 minutes old, severly let down indeed, iritated = holy fudge


  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Aianawa For This Useful Post:

    Silly Wabbit (23rd September 2022)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •