Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Rupert Sheldrake on Exposing the deliberate lies of certain scientists, and peer reviewed telepathy

  1. #1
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    14th September 2013
    Posts
    1,055
    Thanks
    18,566
    Thanked 5,092 Times in 1,050 Posts

    Rupert Sheldrake on Exposing the deliberate lies of certain scientists, and peer reviewed telepathy


    Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocP6JSyicY0

    "Sep 3, 2020 by Better Left Unsaid with Curt Jaimungal

    All the data Rupert Sheldrake references is here: https://www.sheldrake.org/research
    A mini-doc about the affair is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DkrLJ...

    0:00 Introduction
    1:00 Why is it that scientists tend to not take Rupert's ideas seriously? (polemics on materialism and dogmatic atheists)
    2:40 Will "science" come to an end? What will cause this?
    5:10 On the false divide between the natural and the supernatural
    11:10 Rupert's opinion on Daniel Dennett's theory of consciousness
    13:10 On the benign or deleterious nature of "reason"
    15:25 Does our unconscious have an unconscious? How far down does this go?
    18:05 Do we have free will, if we're infinitely influenced by what lies outside our control?
    22:05 Is the "bedrock" of consciousness ordered or random?
    28:15 What's the reality to the picture psychedelics give you access to?
    28:25 What's the ontological reason for the difference between LSD from DMT trips?
    35:10 In what ways is religion ahead of science?
    37:50 On Rupert's famous dog telepathy experiment and the mendacity of certain scientists
    44:25 On Richard Wiseman's supposed lies / distortion (of Rupert's experiment) to the media
    48:08 Wikipedia has been overtaken and distorted by guerrilla skeptics
    50:00 What is the role of myth in "truth"?
    53:40 Are we living in a simulation?
    56:00 What religion and myth say about the creation of world
    57:10 The New Atheists have a false view of God (a bearded man in the sky reprimanding you)
    1:04:10 What do you like / dislike about Jordan Peterson (with regards to making religion more admissible)?
    1:06:10 Where you can find out more about Rupert Sheldrake, and what he's working on next"

  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Kathy For This Useful Post:

    Aianawa (21st September 2020), Elen (21st September 2020), JRS (22nd September 2020), NotAPretender (21st September 2020), Wind (21st September 2020)

  3. #2
    Senior Member NotAPretender's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd April 2017
    Posts
    6,406
    Thanks
    22,633
    Thanked 26,458 Times in 6,362 Posts
    I watched this thing the other night that suggested that science needs to morph. Which given the proper motivation will certainly do. If only to change the 'semantic' meaning of 'Science'.
    “If you cannot do great things, do small things in a great way.”

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to NotAPretender For This Useful Post:

    Elen (22nd September 2020), Kathy (21st September 2020), Wind (21st September 2020)

  5. #3
    Super Moderator Wind's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th January 2015
    Location
    Just here
    Posts
    2,603
    Thanks
    15,264
    Thanked 12,771 Times in 2,607 Posts
    Quote Originally posted by NotAPretender View Post
    I watched this thing the other night that suggested that science needs to morph. Which given the proper motivation will certainly do. If only to change the 'semantic' meaning of 'Science'.
    Rupert is a true scientist at heart.


    Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZGShv8-x0o

  6. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Wind For This Useful Post:

    Elen (22nd September 2020), Kathy (21st September 2020), NotAPretender (21st September 2020)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •