16th November 2019, 04:39
Evolutionary Models for Consciential Life on Earth
This thread (contents) are under construction (revision), so, critiscm and sugestions about the whole or part are always welcome, to help the conciential paradigm be more understandable by people (readers). Most part of contents is dedicated to fundament the building blocks, that together can build a (mental) bridge throught individual or coletive inteligences.
First to read contents bellow, need thought ask deeep inside
What is Life ?
What is Evolution ?
What is Concienciousness ?
What is a Model ? What is a Working Template ?
Everyone know somewhat theese things are, but not enough to know everything. Society and Civilization are relatively aware about, but neither Science nor Religion enlight theese things as they are, unless exploring human ingenuity to love something Godness that is not himself. Science can not prove that God exists, So, say dont exist and Religion say exists like a dream.
So, why Science don't research a dream inside itself ?
That's what this contents are going to talk much about.
Despite all resistance of various origins and sources, the Newtonian Cartesian mechanistic paradigm of conventional science is currently incomplete. Humankind need a model that orients activities and norms of scientific research as a whole to avoid self-defensive nature that leads to hide information or remain silent when faced with incomprehensible issues, which it is incapable or does not yet possess the resources to solve.
The keywords here are Emerging Paradigm or Required Scientific Paradigm, Disciplinary Matrix, Fundamental Scientific Decoding, Leading Theory for Main Scentific Model, or in more simple words, Standard-Theory for Every-Think.
Follow three examples of intraphysical complacency or collective, tacit pathological thought feelings :
1. Present Newton Cartezian Conventional science avoids directly researching the Consciousness as an object of Scientific Study, which is a Contradiction or even a Irrationality.
2. Opposed to Multilingualism, native English speakers avoid talking about their basic Monolingualism, which creates gaps in their culture and affects areas of science in general, based upon the English language.
3. The majority of armed forces, in all countries, do not refer to their own reality of being professional-technical hunters killers.
The Newtonian Cartesian Mechanistic Paradigm has systematically kept scientists profoundly ignorant of parapsychism, interdimensionality of the intraphysical consciousness or public sciences related do Conscientiology, its realities, principles and laws. In this obstinate Unawareness of parapsychism, authorities publicly affirm that the enigmas of life are entirely based in the natural sciences and only in the development of the cells of the human body, avoiding the Soul Consciousness as a cell field of life manifestation and experience.
This is the great gap in human understanding. Scientists voluntarily and blindly distance themselves from the deeper and more productive reality of Consciential Evolution even from themselves, which is Naturally capable of further accelerating the inner progress of humankind, under the pretext which worth only employing objective but superficial Epidermic methods.
Among the follies and resistance of the still immature and materialistic scientific community, we can single out the regrettable absence of discernment and perspective in the establishment of Priorities for basic or pure Natural Research, which could lead to a more consciential technology, instead Artifical devices that induces material human dependancy to make money.
For example, considerable official subsidies, financial grants and support coming from resources provided by all of us who make contributions, are currently earmarked for sometimes useless, absolutely non-priority and even repetitive technical studies of the tiny hairs of the sexual organs of some small, unknown animal. This research does not have the slightest chance of providing immediate aid to starving children, young non-students, or adult consciousnesses who are at odds with themselves, all of whom pertain to the minorities of intraphysical society.
Up until the present, no person or governmental organ has been encountered that would sponsor the most promising research project for the sophisticated parapsychic analysis of the consciousness, a vital, priority subject for everyone in all places, times or circumstances. The International Institute of Projectiology and Conscientiology completed decades of work without having been granted any official Subsidy.
Those wishing to bear this out need only observe the number of traditional, costly technical magazines. A somewhat greater degree of sensibleness on the part of upcoming human generations is to be hoped for, those alive at the time will see this overwhelming demand all over the planet, because Low-level interests can turn science into a negative discipline, like bellicosity, atomic bombs, anti-ecological endeavors, anti-bioethical realizations like sex change. Other human objectives also impair scientific development under the Veil of Ignorance.
Those who diligently combat, restrain or omit new scientific conquests, whether they are religious persons, politicians, militarists, industrialists, merchants, lobbyists or even certain immature scientists, when doing so in a criminal manner, behave atavistically like birds of prey.
The delinquent plunderers intend to maintain the ignorance of brainwashed, robotized beings who live under the control of their social oligarchy influence. The maintenance of the status quo of profit and the expansion of Elite Privileges that the oligarchy enjoys, and to which it is addicted, are dependent upon the manipulation of these beings and this blind ignorance and consciential control. Misoneists or neophobic individuals, not having these advantages and privileges, would not know how to live the human experience, arising from renewal in other bases, which are generated precisely by these new scientific conquests.
Thus the current vicious circle of dominating dominated intraphysical consciousnesses continues (Corporatism, Lobbyism, Nepotism, Ethnocentrism) in many fields. So, All scientific laws, as rigid as they may be, are susceptible to Revision. In science, it is impracticable to offer a general, exhaustive response that fully answers a question, because Scientific Truth is Dynamic, corrects itself and does not purport to be definitive.
Scientific knowledge remains fresh for as short period of time, because There is no Permanence granted for Scientific Concepts. The life of a scientific work (paper) is very short. The obsolescence of the materials available to us is continually more intensive and pressuring. Little of that which the author affirms today will be correct ten years from now. Articles published a decade-and-a-half ago are almost useless in many scientific fields.
The bulk of what we learn now will not be sufficiently correct within five decades. In the world of today or the increasingly rapidly mutating intraphysicology, the phenomenon of acceleration of human history, in which we are immersed and rooted, is irreversible and overwhelms neophobic and anachronistic minds in all lines of intraphysical knowledge.
On the other hand, the acceleration of history promotes the democratization of information and the shortening of the period of infancy, puberty, adolescence and the generation gap. Intraphysical consciousnesses mature at an earlier age. Today, there are ten-year-old mothers and twelve-year-old assassins and drug dealers.
What is of the greatest importance is to create and maintain a scientifically alive, open and creatively stimulating environment. In science, one needs to elude conceptual straightjackets of Neophobia. Only in a world of amateurs can an individual intend to possess monolithic omniscience or absolute certainty.
Science has the magic wand of being eternally new. The revision of a theory does not necessarily weaken it. It can even strengthen it. When we find ourselves Counciously Modifying our Conceptions in this manner, it does not constitute a loss for our scientific point of view, but a useful victory. In science, each former aware abandoned point of view signifies a new step forward in scientific vision. The consciousness is not a product of matter.
Despite resistance from traditional scientists, parapsychic research is calling for drastic revision of the conventional structures of various segments of mechanist science with regard to the Comprehension of Human Nature and the nature of reality itself. In psychic and parapsychic areas, there are many phenomena which are currently subject to intense controversy, like the phenomenological complex of Unidentified Flying Objects (UFO).
Other facts have been described, verified and documented with such frequency by scientific observers that they are no longer the subject of heated debate, like Hypnosis and Telepathy. However, deep obscurity still persists for us regarding the essence of these phenomena, including those which are more accepted or, more to the point, less stigmatized.
Besides this, it is necessary to definitively destroy the link between pure parapsychism and the following four spurious Subsociety Realities:
1. Occultism or popular group autism.
2. Inappropriate commercialism.
4. Shrewd mystification.
As difficult as this may prove to be, it has to be done. As things are, unfortunately, serious persons distance themselves and a field as promising as this is characterized as an ingenuous, disconnected simplistic subsociety. So, one cannot enter into a world of significances without formulating the necessary postulates.
In religion, these postulates are called blind or rationalized faith. In the majority of religions, the sacred, infallible truth is decreed through doctrine (dogmatization, dogmatics, theology). Its acceptance is based on the unquestionable faith of ingenuous religiosity. Any sign of doubt or questioning is considered heresy or dissidence, when not bordering on anathema.
In ethics, postulates receive the names of norms or ideals. In science, postulates are hypotheses or theories. Science does not give sermons on unverifiable truths.
The following are five negative results of unverifiable, absolute and imposed truths pertaining to the religious and governments demagogies of the great theological empires, ancient, traditional and modern sects:
1. Exaltation of the spirit of Clan.
2. Subtle inculcation of sectarian belief through the channels of social welfare.
3. Palliative social welfare, in appearance only, with no real remissive intention, so called Primary Consolation Task.
4. Manifest or masked indoctrination, catechism, subordination, proselytism and brainwashing, aiming at mystical salvationism.
5. Imposition of static principles and sacralizations, without a right to question anything (anathema).
We are aware of a greater number of advantages than disadvantages, in the scientific discoveries that we have up until now. On the other hand, scientific investigation has to be pure, and there should not be limits to scientific research. What is scientifically done, or produced in a laboratory, should not always be realized with a predetermined goal, because great discovers can be made over unexpected observable commuting accidents.
Nevertheless, in light of the above, we can neither exclude Philosophy as a useful coadjutant, nor Ethics as a wise rule of behavior (cosmoethics) from science. Every school has its specific policy. Philosophy and Ethics, as well as Logic, are indispensable for restricting the excesses of human immaturity in the process of brutalization stemming from the abuses of applied science in technology (technicians, technological torture, technophobia, technolatry, technovictims, technodependents), and the actions of the public opinion agencies.
Following nineteen examples of the so-called monstrous threats of biotechnology, the great economic vector of the twenty-first century, involving the two extremes of human life, the fetus (cradle) and the elderly (grave):
01. Everyday and cutting-edge bioethics.
02. Artificial insemination.
04. Rejected human embryos.
05. The australian physician who had 10,000 children.
06. Human genome research.
07. Human abortion.
09. Kidney-tranplant tourism.
10. The human market or the marketing of human life.
11. The removal of organs from adopted children.
12. The exportation of children.
13. The genetically engineered rat.
14. The fly with 15 pairs of eyes.
15. The cloning of Sheep Dolly.
16. The cow Rose that produces human milk.
17. The cloning reproduction of the human being.
18. The bioethical question of arms.
19. The indiscriminate and careless use of nuclear energy.
Immature scientists avoid discussing ends. They only discuss means. Therein, the maturity of Cosmoethics, which is still completely inexistent, should come into play. Science, per se, does not have an identity. It has to be free and prospective. The manner in which we use science is very important, as is its ethical utilization (cosmoethics).
(continue next post#2)
Last edited by Border Dog, 18th November 2019 at 02:36.
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Border Dog For This Useful Post:
Aianawa (18th November 2019), Aragorn (16th November 2019), Dreamtimer (20th November 2019), sourcetruth (16th November 2019)
16th November 2019, 04:53
Scientific means should be perfectly Honest. Let us observe what occurs in this world of modern bioethics. Ethics is not quantitative, but qualitative. For example, as military security measures (top secret), the ideologues (technocrats) of the technologistic (computerization of society) system, divide scientific projects into as many functional parts as possible, delivering their solution to separate groups. The scientist, usually a first-rate experimenter, domesticated in this manner, works in total ignorance of the reason behind his/her project. He/she is not aware of the true ideological determinants that govern his/her personal process (minicog), as a part of an entire structure or system (maximechanism), the primary proposal of which is the technologization of society. It is the distorted, amoral, model of scientific knowledge.
In War, evil is organized bureaucratically, through the interaction of science and technology, so that no one beneath their superiors can be held responsible for that which occurs, So, the pointers of cosmoethical consciousnesses become diluted.
The erratic cold application of Aristotelian and Newtonian concepts, tempered with Cartesianism, has drenched this planet with human blood, notably in the twentieth century. Besides the death industry, which is maintained by political leaders and military technicians, the Greatest Error committed by the scientists of incomplete science, which is regulated by the still dominant Newtonian Cartesian mechanistic paradigm, is the myopic decision made by the majority of the professional community to continue to entirely ignore the extraphysical nature of the human consciousness.
This is the absolute and absurd resistance to interdimensional or multidimensional relative truth. Scientific knowledge can be canonical, preconceived and pretentious. Myopic researchers devote all of their attention exclusively to the physical, organic, Peripheral or Superficial areas of the personality, which are far more complex when addressed in a comprehensive manner. They thus feel vindicated.
Sheltered within crippled-semiscience, in the mutilation of knowledge and the explosion of fragmented knowledge, researchers with temporal power paralyze scientific research projects by establishing a lowest common denominator and committing their efforts to the Dermatology of the Consciousness, where they feel more secure and have greater economic and social support.
Orthodox science (purism) and orthodox religion (fundamentalism) have both been institutionalized and frozen within a mutually exclusive Dichotomy. This is a pathological, or a drastic Sociopathy, because it maintains subcultures and selective blindness. On one hand, the author has therefore sought to eliminate all conditioning resulting from cultural development over decades, notably in regard to religion, a knowledge which is as outdated, in the phase of consciential maturity, as any other line kindergarten like course. On the other hand, he guides himself through secularism, rationalism and empiricism, although based upon an integrative, greater, holo-somatic, multidimensional, evolutionary universalism, endeavoring to see today and tomorrow, the here and now and elsewhere, the present-future.
The interdimensional, transphysical phenomena of projectiology surpass the current resources for the physical detection of universal occurrences that are utilized by conventional science. So far, they allow only the interested individual to directly access the processes and orientations developed here.
In summary, only personal Empiricism is executed. They are still unable to offer traditional, direct, scientific replicability of consciential phenomena or, in other words, public, universal, easy or common Empiricism. When we compare knowledge gained through conventional, orthodox science with the knowledge gained through innate Counscious Projections, we can identify the fundamental Difference between one and the other.
Traditional or conventional scientific knowledge is contingent. Its propositions or hypotheses have their veracity or falsity perceived through non-participatory, Universal, replicable experimentation. It is not obtained merely through reason, as occurs with Philosophical knowledge. The veracity or falsity of the propositions or hypotheses of projectiological knowledge are also currently based on experimentation, with the only difference being that it is a Personal, Individual, Participative, non-universal and non-public (intraconsciential) experimentation.
Parapsychic knowledge allows only Personal Verifiability, the employment of reason and the Mutual Critiquing of experiences between experimenter projectors. This helps the exemplificative intraphysical consciousness. Despite the differences, similarities also occur. Traditional or conventional scientific knowledge, as well as projectiological knowledge, are Systematic. They stem from logically organized knowledge, forming systems of ideas or theories and not disperse disconnected knowledge. The interested individual can bear out this fact with the projective techniques.
Both traditional scientific knowledge, as well as projectiological knowledge, constitute fallible knowledge, by virtue of the fact that they are not definitive, absolute or final. For this reason, they always are approximately exact, ie, always Relative, So, new propositions and the development of conventional and projective techniques can reformulate the collection of existing theories.
Science cannot be limited in its research. Nevertheless, pure science always endeavors to be a general science and not an individual science. Science likes universals, not particulars. It deals only with broad, preferably universal (nomothetic) laws. Individuality cannot be studied correctly through existing conventional science, but by history, art or biography. The methods of which are not nomothetic or, in other words, involve the formation of general laws or seek out universal laws. They are, however, idiographic, namely, those which endeavor to study individual cases (reports, experiences, experiments). This scientific dogma of universality is a contradiction because it places an arbitrary limitation upon the unlimited range of scientific investigation.
About Evolution, Conventional scientists lack the priority module of evolutionary intelligence. The consciousness is nevertheless a phenomenon, even when it is encountered only in individual forms. The consciousness, as an object, is an unwavering trans-knowledge that is before us.
Conventional science, in an illogical and partial manner, does not take into account that which we really feel: the subjective experience (individual and collective). It describes the cosmos or a world of things that have no value, interacting as though humanity did not exist. It describes nature in a cold, incomplete and unsatisfactory manner.
Individuality creates unique problems for conventional science. It may be the greatest relevant problem that Conscientiology represents for the person of conventional science (participative consciousness). The consciousness is therefore a disturbance or an inconvenience for incomplete science.
As the consciousness is a universal phenomenon, Science – although remaining frozen in an exclusively nomothetic manner of thinking – has to study this nuisance in order to maintain its coherence. Nevertheless, it cannot study it correctly, except when it seeks the individuality of standardization (a paradox).
This is the essential dilemma of incomplete or alienating science over the last two centuries, represented by the separation of subject and object. This began the logical exhaustion of the Newtonian Cartesian Mechanistic paradigm, which is still in force.
From this point forward, the conventional scientist, who still possesses neither the authority nor the experience to correctly study the universal phenomenon of personality or the consciousness, also lacks the authority to correctly judge the research and findings of Conscientiology or the personality, when considered in its entirety (holo-somatic, multi-dimensional, pluri-existential, holo-biographical). These are the facts.
The individual who makes more concessions to intraphysical powers fairs better at that moment and in the world of superficial discoveries. The individual who seeks to transcend the common standard of scientific mediocrity, limiting personal concessions, is the only personality who will be able to attain the leadingedge relative truths of conscious projection and obtain a better level of Conscientiality in regard to personal intraconsciential and extraconsciential realities. This will allow the individual to overcome the dispensable self-mimicries that constantly attempt to monopolize that which we do in human life.
Events directly related to human beings never repeat themselves the same way twice. There are no two similar or identical individualities. Events can, however, have a subjacent determinism. This definitively makes the basic scientific determination of replicability of facts or laboratorial research inviable.
This also eliminates material instruments or physical resources as being inadequate. It furthermore removes pure science and immature scientists from the scientific investigations of Conscientiology – the science of the whole psychological individuality – and, consequently, from consious projections, both of which demand participative research (consciential energies and parapsychism) in order to reduce the current partial nature of incomplete science.
The idiographic or individual study of the personality or the consciousness, in an isolated manner, is extremely complex. In practice, it is extremely difficult to study an isolated individual, because nobody exists alone (a fundamental three-word mega-thought-feeling).
On the other hand, every time we measure, we are introducing a general or nomothetic law. If taken literally, the idiographic perspective is absurd. We can, however, accept it as an appeal to not neglect the individual in our search for general laws.
The facts of projections of conciousness definitively convince only the lucid projector through self-thought-feeling. Thus far, projection of counciousness does not have a foundation capable of persuading non-practitioner or non-participant researchers. It is hoped that this possibility shall arise one day, with the development of refined technology applied to consciousness research. At this point, the mechanistic paradigm – the Guiding Myth of contemporary incomplete science – will have already been substituted by a new consciential paradigm defined by projectiology.
Ambiguities is the thought that progresses beyond the ingenuous logic of current human society, a less precise paradigm that is still contaminated with doubtful dualities that need to be eliminated. Scientifically speaking, we are currently undergoing the crisis of Transition, the pains of integration, the ethics of the interim, toward the primacy of a new paradigm.
There are even holistic researchers who think that we are currently living in a post-paradigmatic period, wherein two scientific paradigms (the depleted and the new) somehow peacefully coexist as Doubleness.
Projectiology currently has little to offer the researcher who is a purist and a mechanist, in regard to the impersonalization of science and the inviolability of the principle of direct, systematic replicability, impeded from conducting experiments of a participative nature, and consequently, developing him/herself regarding the consciential aspect, whether it is due to temperament, mesological repressions, personal conditioning or an inability to tolerate crises of ambiguities.
Recommended to study (pattern-behavior versus exception-behavior) of post-mortem parapsychoses and Extraphysical Melancholy to all, with a maximum of (honest and ethic) self-critique and hetero-critique as possible.
The use of adequate, sophisticated instrumentation can one day substitute personal projectiological experiments in consciousness research. This instrumentation has not yet been invented to public access (like Project Looking Glass and Remote View). This is a challenge to our intelligence, which has remained undefeated since the nineteenth century.
Today the conscious experience is the most efficient instrument of choice at hand in consciousness research. This however, is not as bad, deficient or inefficient Instrument as it may seem to those less attentive individuals.
There are adversaries of the consciential paradigm, those who affirm that we should not research the consciousness by way of another consciousness, but instead, through the use of material apparatuses or physical instruments.
At this point, it is worth posing four rational questions and presenting their respective answers:
1. Who created these apparatuses and instruments? The creative human consciousness.
2. Who performs research in all the areas of traditional and modern science? The human consciousness as researcher.
3. With which instrumentation, for example, does neurology research the human brain itself? Precisely with the brains of neurophysiologists or neuroscientists, researching the brains of human beings through the functioning of their own brains.
4. If the human consciousness cannot research itself and other consciousnesses, inevitably in a participative manner, who is it that these arguers and conventional science itself hope that will research it? The virus? This is nonsense or an absurdity?
(continue next post#3)
Last edited by Border Dog, 19th November 2019 at 23:14.
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Border Dog For This Useful Post:
Aianawa (18th November 2019), Aragorn (16th November 2019), Dreamtimer (20th November 2019), sourcetruth (16th November 2019)
16th November 2019, 05:01
As can be seen, this is an undoubtedly irrational argument. We can thereby rationally perceive how conventional science is indefensibly contradictory, omissive, immature and mundane (tropospheric). For two centuries, science has been irrationally and habitually concealing resources and constantly evading by a collective group, lobbyists or corporatist defense mechanisms, the direct chakra-to-chakra, pore-to-pore research of the consciousness or the participative research of the researcher object. We cannot dispute the facts.
The scientist is not merely a camera lens, recorder or computer. After all, direct observation is the best source of knowledge. This is so even when – or still when – this direct observation is multidimensional or is performed with the para-eyes (sixty chakra, or third eye).
In regard to all this, there is one invariable reality: there is no substitute for personal experience. People knows that right hand has five fingers and furthermore, knows how to operate it to benefit them. No one needs to give lessons in this regard. Everything in our transitory life in this intraphysical dimension requires a technique. Even avoiding a sneeze. Nowadays, there are also logical, rational techniques for anyone who is interested in understanding him/herself in an integral or holo-somatic manner.
Fortunately or unfortunately, the fact is that conventional science, which remains myopic, does not possess these techniques. The interested individual endeavors to change paradigms and create Neosynapses, devoid of Neophobia.
On one hand, many of our propositions are still not science, being merely scientific hopes, in the sincere opinion of the mechanistic scientist, who is fearful of losing professional security, being dependent on financed survival from conventional science, under the pressure of which has been living, So, how many authors has been absolutely independent researchers for the past decades are knowed by mankind ?
On the other hand, as with conventional incomplete science, these projectiological propositions still constitute handicapped Semi-Science, or Pseudo-Science. For this reason, the best way to facilitate the advent and the full implantation of matured science will be to understand how dense the darkness that we touch is, regarding conventional science, on the one hand, as well as regarding projectiology, on the other hand.
Never forget that the presuppositions of conventional natural science, with which we began, are provisional and subject to revision. In scientific debates, a theory cannot be defended in an irrational manner, notably one which is old or antiquated. Science requires classification and we are not able to obtain general knowledge unless we group phenomena on the basis of similarities (identities, affinities, interactions).
Through matured science, the individual who defends the theory of existential seriation will be able to prophylactically defend it against the causes of repetitive existential lifetimes or Unconscious Self-Mimicries, that generate loss in energy, effort, mental time and evolutionary opportunities in the micro-universe of our consciousnesses.
The great difference between conventional, mechanistic, physicalist science and conscientiology (a world of consciential and multidimensional research) is a matter of priority with regard to two Perspectives:
1. A Scientist. The conventional, materialist, four-dimensional or parochial scientist feels incompetent because he/she still dies in the transitory human body. This scientist would like to take shortcuts, living forever in an illusory matter, through the elixir of eternal youth.
2. A Serenissimus. The serenissimus, having a multidimensional, holosomatic, maxi-universalistic perspective, feels incompetent because he/she still needs to live in the transitory human body. He/she would like to skip steps, living forever disconnected from matter, in his/her infinite self-evolutionary career.
The (universalistic and interdimensional) Scientist, within the world of conscientiology research is, above all, as a first step, interested in attaining the most difficult of the last (but always relative) Syntheses of the most essential (priority) analyses and investigations of the consciousness, or human personality, within the globalizing context of the physical universe.
This interest allows the individual to finally achieve, at a later stage, the context of the consciential universes that exist and can be reached by the ego that is restricted and immersed in the process of re-birth (or reincarnation). These stages of more sophisticated (and the most important) investigation can only be achieved by the lucid consciousness through its intelligent performance, proceeding from the mental-body, controlling its whole-body, in order to control a truly more ample range of consciential dimensions, while in the mature human body.
Following thirteen factors that among many others, predispose unnecessary Repetitions in existential seriation or multiexistential experiences, presented here in alphabetical order:
01. Bad information, subinformation and disinformation.
02. Concealment of data.
03. Conditioned repressions.
04. Deeply rooted taboos.
05. Erudite charlatanism.
06. Exploitation of public credulity.
07. Fictional occultism.
08. Instinctive mysticism.
09. Irrational sacralizations.
10. Manipulation of vulnerable consciousnesses.
11. Popular beliefs.
12. Professional esoterism.
13. Subtle abdominal brainwashing.
Faced with life’s problems and the need to understand human nature and the structures of the consciousness, individuals tend to place excessive Hope, or have Faith, in conventional, mechanistic, incomplete science, as though it could solve all of humankind’s problems. To a considerable extent, many of these problems can be resolved in other ways of understanding reality, or other Modes of Cognition, as for example, esthetic, religious forms or non-empirical suppositions.
Nevertheless always recommends here, with all honesty, the integration of conventional science with the simple consciential paradigm of projections. All things being equal, we should prefer The Simpler Theory or that which resorts to fewer presuppositions and paradigms. This is a concept used by conventional science itself (“Occam’s razor” - as though to demonstrate that out of many possibilities, the simplest is often the best).
At this point, it is valuable to understand our Whims, in increasing order, which manifest in three ways:
1. The mind – in this case the intraphysical consciousness or the consciousness with its personal cerebral dictionary and Biomemory, is less whimsical.
2. The Will is always moderately whimsical.
3. The Emotion is always overly whimsical.
As previously argued, the Scientific Form is a singular one, among many existing alternatives, for understanding our inner and external reality. Science shows itself to be better, because it is founded on the bases of the evolved mental body, the home of consciousness. This signifies logic, rationality, discernment, refutation and vanguard, relative truth.
In summary, what is presently lacking in conventional science is the more refined discernment of priority. The majority of conventional scientists have still not discovered the existence of evolutionary intelligence. Other lines of knowledge and human inquiry, e.g., art, esthetics and religion, establish their bases in the less evolved emotional body, or psycho-body, or astral-body, or body-of-desires.
This signifies systematic emotionality, dogmatism, perverse indoctrination, abdominal brainwashing, distorted truth (subinformation, disinformation) or disguised will (the quality of intention), in order to Manipulate Consciousnesses or Social Beings. This troublesome, Anticosmoethical Work has been efficiently performed throughout the twentieth century by opinion shapers, agitators, multifaceted demagogues, merchants of many origins and the shameless manipulators of robotized consciousnesses (existential robotization).
The religious person, when based only in the emotional body and moved by sectarianism, repudiates, with violent suspicion, the consciential qualities coming from the mental body. This individual combats open education, universalistic knowledge, the intellect and the science. This individual erroneously considers these things to be destroyers of instinctive sentiment, innate intuition, Natural Piety and Innocent Perspicacity. This does not, however, correspond to the reality of multidimensionality and applied cosmoethics.
Those who merely possess natural good sense, lacking the logical bases of scientific research, are afraid of expressing themselves and are anxious to demonstrate that their points of view are correct. They use all their passions and sophistic weapons to this end. The rational decider, the pointer of the discerning consciousness, cannot be moved by emotions. Consciousness research only becomes established in the more Serene Researcher.
As previously affirmed, the main mechanistic model of conventional science is presently heading toward exhaustion. It alone cannot answer all questions and Whys regarding the comprehension of your own complex personality. The simple intraphysical consciousness does not exist in the main mechanistic model.
For example, science still cannot explicate the following three aspects with reasonable explanations or techniques of Self-control:
1. Greater control of your personal behavior.
2. Making of wiser choices Decisions in your daily life.
3. The brilliant scientist’s lack of emotional Self-Control.
It should not be forgotten that we still encounter the following seven categories, among others, of contradictory and embarrassing professionals with relative ease in this intraphysical society:
1. the Cardinal who smokes (addicted to pipes and cigars).
2. the Obese dietician (addicted to food).
3. the monolinguistic Chancellor Diplomat.
4. the illiterate Journalist (the press).
5. the Nobel Prize winner found to be a pedophile.
6. the Lung Specialist who is an inveterate smoker.
7. the onycophagic Psychiatrist (oral habit of nail biting).
Therefore, if you are disillusioned with conventional science, explains nothing about the why, but only about the how, you only stand to gain if, from this point on, you also begin your personal, participative research, in order to help improve this situation that disappoints you.
Come over to science. Help to prove the new consciential paradigm, the emerging model, the most recent decoding or scientific systematization. New perspective. This will signify three renovations or innovations:
1. A new projectiological perspective on Life.
2. A recycling of Science itself.
3. An alteration of the perspective of History.
The clear objective of this text is to emphasize pieces of evidence, however concise they may be, of this vanguard reality or this leading-edge relative truth, thereby presenting these ideas, which then no longer need to be reinvented in the near future, either in this human existence or in others. In the practical, daily life of the conscientiology (and the subdiscipline of projectiology) researcher, at least the three following scientific priorities, listed here in chronological order, are rationally indispensable:
1. Self-organization. Organize one’s own intraconsciential, intraphysical and extraphysical life: personal discipline.
2. Self-experimentation. Accumulate the facts observed in the consciential dimensions: participative personal experimentation.
3. Fixation. Present the findings, independent of any other intercurrent factors or variables, placing the less impermanent scientific communications above the ephemeral intraphysical institutions: the fixating of leading-edge relative ideas into human life.
This formula, which is simple to present and difficult to execute, is a logical way for the consciousness to experience the meshing of healthy multi-existential self-relays, thereby becoming a minicog within a multi-dimensional, interconsciential, interpersonal, assistential maximechanism.
The theory defended here - in its first generation - for the integral analysis of the consciousness is stimulating and Potentially Fecund. This theory at least presents a summarily influential structure in preparation for later Technical Developments.
Last edited by Border Dog, 16th November 2019 at 07:58.
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Border Dog For This Useful Post:
Aianawa (18th November 2019), Aragorn (16th November 2019), Dreamtimer (20th November 2019), sourcetruth (16th November 2019)
16th November 2019, 06:56