This thread (contents) are under construction (revision), so, critiscm and sugestions about the whole or part are always welcome, to help the conciential paradigm be more understandable by people (readers). Most part of contents is dedicated to fundament the building blocks, that together can build a (mental) bridge throught individual or coletive inteligences.
--------------------------------------
First to read contents bellow, need thought ask deeep inside
What is Life ?
What is Evolution ?
What is Concienciousness ?
What is a Model ? What is a Working Template ?
Everyone know somewhat theese things are, but not enough to know everything. Society and Civilization are relatively aware about, but neither Science nor Religion enlight theese things as they are, unless exploring human ingenuity to love something Godness that is not himself. Science can not prove that God exists, So, say dont exist and Religion say exists like a dream.
So, why Science don't research a dream inside itself ?
That's what this contents are going to talk much about.
Despite all resistance of various origins and sources, the Newtonian Cartesian mechanistic paradigm of conventional science is currently incomplete. Humankind need a model that orients activities and norms of scientific research as a whole to avoid self-defensive nature that leads to hide information or remain silent when faced with incomprehensible issues, which it is incapable or does not yet possess the resources to solve.
The keywords here are Emerging Paradigm or Required Scientific Paradigm, Disciplinary Matrix, Fundamental Scientific Decoding, Leading Theory for Main Scentific Model, or in more simple words, Standard-Theory for Every-Think.
Follow three examples of intraphysical complacency or collective, tacit pathological thought feelings :
1. Present Newton Cartezian Conventional science avoids directly researching the Consciousness as an object of Scientific Study, which is a Contradiction or even a Irrationality.
2. Opposed to Multilingualism, native English speakers avoid talking about their basic Monolingualism, which creates gaps in their culture and affects areas of science in general, based upon the English language.
3. The majority of armed forces, in all countries, do not refer to their own reality of being professional-technical hunters killers.
The Newtonian Cartesian Mechanistic Paradigm has systematically kept scientists profoundly ignorant of parapsychism, interdimensionality of the intraphysical consciousness or public sciences related do Conscientiology, its realities, principles and laws. In this obstinate Unawareness of parapsychism, authorities publicly affirm that the enigmas of life are entirely based in the natural sciences and only in the development of the cells of the human body, avoiding the Soul Consciousness as a cell field of life manifestation and experience.
This is the great gap in human understanding. Scientists voluntarily and blindly distance themselves from the deeper and more productive reality of Consciential Evolution even from themselves, which is Naturally capable of further accelerating the inner progress of humankind, under the pretext which worth only employing objective but superficial Epidermic methods.
Among the follies and resistance of the still immature and materialistic scientific community, we can single out the regrettable absence of discernment and perspective in the establishment of Priorities for basic or pure Natural Research, which could lead to a more consciential technology, instead Artifical devices that induces material human dependancy to make money.
For example, considerable official subsidies, financial grants and support coming from resources provided by all of us who make contributions, are currently earmarked for sometimes useless, absolutely non-priority and even repetitive technical studies of the tiny hairs of the sexual organs of some small, unknown animal. This research does not have the slightest chance of providing immediate aid to starving children, young non-students, or adult consciousnesses who are at odds with themselves, all of whom pertain to the minorities of intraphysical society.
Up until the present, no person or governmental organ has been encountered that would sponsor the most promising research project for the sophisticated parapsychic analysis of the consciousness, a vital, priority subject for everyone in all places, times or circumstances. The International Institute of Projectiology and Conscientiology completed decades of work without having been granted any official Subsidy.
Those wishing to bear this out need only observe the number of traditional, costly technical magazines. A somewhat greater degree of sensibleness on the part of upcoming human generations is to be hoped for, those alive at the time will see this overwhelming demand all over the planet, because Low-level interests can turn science into a negative discipline, like bellicosity, atomic bombs, anti-ecological endeavors, anti-bioethical realizations like sex change. Other human objectives also impair scientific development under the Veil of Ignorance.
Those who diligently combat, restrain or omit new scientific conquests, whether they are religious persons, politicians, militarists, industrialists, merchants, lobbyists or even certain immature scientists, when doing so in a criminal manner, behave atavistically like birds of prey.
The delinquent plunderers intend to maintain the ignorance of brainwashed, robotized beings who live under the control of their social oligarchy influence. The maintenance of the status quo of profit and the expansion of Elite Privileges that the oligarchy enjoys, and to which it is addicted, are dependent upon the manipulation of these beings and this blind ignorance and consciential control. Misoneists or neophobic individuals, not having these advantages and privileges, would not know how to live the human experience, arising from renewal in other bases, which are generated precisely by these new scientific conquests.
Thus the current vicious circle of dominating dominated intraphysical consciousnesses continues (Corporatism, Lobbyism, Nepotism, Ethnocentrism) in many fields. So, All scientific laws, as rigid as they may be, are susceptible to Revision. In science, it is impracticable to offer a general, exhaustive response that fully answers a question, because Scientific Truth is Dynamic, corrects itself and does not purport to be definitive.
Scientific knowledge remains fresh for as short period of time, because There is no Permanence granted for Scientific Concepts. The life of a scientific work (paper) is very short. The obsolescence of the materials available to us is continually more intensive and pressuring. Little of that which the author affirms today will be correct ten years from now. Articles published a decade-and-a-half ago are almost useless in many scientific fields.
The bulk of what we learn now will not be sufficiently correct within five decades. In the world of today or the increasingly rapidly mutating intraphysicology, the phenomenon of acceleration of human history, in which we are immersed and rooted, is irreversible and overwhelms neophobic and anachronistic minds in all lines of intraphysical knowledge.
On the other hand, the acceleration of history promotes the democratization of information and the shortening of the period of infancy, puberty, adolescence and the generation gap. Intraphysical consciousnesses mature at an earlier age. Today, there are ten-year-old mothers and twelve-year-old assassins and drug dealers.
What is of the greatest importance is to create and maintain a scientifically alive, open and creatively stimulating environment. In science, one needs to elude conceptual straightjackets of Neophobia. Only in a world of amateurs can an individual intend to possess monolithic omniscience or absolute certainty.
Science has the magic wand of being eternally new. The revision of a theory does not necessarily weaken it. It can even strengthen it. When we find ourselves Counciously Modifying our Conceptions in this manner, it does not constitute a loss for our scientific point of view, but a useful victory. In science, each former aware abandoned point of view signifies a new step forward in scientific vision. The consciousness is not a product of matter.
Despite resistance from traditional scientists, parapsychic research is calling for drastic revision of the conventional structures of various segments of mechanist science with regard to the Comprehension of Human Nature and the nature of reality itself. In psychic and parapsychic areas, there are many phenomena which are currently subject to intense controversy, like the phenomenological complex of Unidentified Flying Objects (UFO).
Other facts have been described, verified and documented with such frequency by scientific observers that they are no longer the subject of heated debate, like Hypnosis and Telepathy. However, deep obscurity still persists for us regarding the essence of these phenomena, including those which are more accepted or, more to the point, less stigmatized.
Besides this, it is necessary to definitively destroy the link between pure parapsychism and the following four spurious Subsociety Realities:
1. Occultism or popular group autism.
2. Inappropriate commercialism.
3. Sensationalism.
4. Shrewd mystification.
As difficult as this may prove to be, it has to be done. As things are, unfortunately, serious persons distance themselves and a field as promising as this is characterized as an ingenuous, disconnected simplistic subsociety. So, one cannot enter into a world of significances without formulating the necessary postulates.
In religion, these postulates are called blind or rationalized faith. In the majority of religions, the sacred, infallible truth is decreed through doctrine (dogmatization, dogmatics, theology). Its acceptance is based on the unquestionable faith of ingenuous religiosity. Any sign of doubt or questioning is considered heresy or dissidence, when not bordering on anathema.
In ethics, postulates receive the names of norms or ideals. In science, postulates are hypotheses or theories. Science does not give sermons on unverifiable truths.
The following are five negative results of unverifiable, absolute and imposed truths pertaining to the religious and governments demagogies of the great theological empires, ancient, traditional and modern sects:
1. Exaltation of the spirit of Clan.
2. Subtle inculcation of sectarian belief through the channels of social welfare.
3. Palliative social welfare, in appearance only, with no real remissive intention, so called Primary Consolation Task.
4. Manifest or masked indoctrination, catechism, subordination, proselytism and brainwashing, aiming at mystical salvationism.
5. Imposition of static principles and sacralizations, without a right to question anything (anathema).
We are aware of a greater number of advantages than disadvantages, in the scientific discoveries that we have up until now. On the other hand, scientific investigation has to be pure, and there should not be limits to scientific research. What is scientifically done, or produced in a laboratory, should not always be realized with a predetermined goal, because great discovers can be made over unexpected observable commuting accidents.
Nevertheless, in light of the above, we can neither exclude Philosophy as a useful coadjutant, nor Ethics as a wise rule of behavior (cosmoethics) from science. Every school has its specific policy. Philosophy and Ethics, as well as Logic, are indispensable for restricting the excesses of human immaturity in the process of brutalization stemming from the abuses of applied science in technology (technicians, technological torture, technophobia, technolatry, technovictims, technodependents), and the actions of the public opinion agencies.
Following nineteen examples of the so-called monstrous threats of biotechnology, the great economic vector of the twenty-first century, involving the two extremes of human life, the fetus (cradle) and the elderly (grave):
01. Everyday and cutting-edge bioethics.
02. Artificial insemination.
03. Pre-embryos.
04. Rejected human embryos.
05. The australian physician who had 10,000 children.
06. Human genome research.
07. Human abortion.
08. Euthanasia.
09. Kidney-tranplant tourism.
10. The human market or the marketing of human life.
11. The removal of organs from adopted children.
12. The exportation of children.
13. The genetically engineered rat.
14. The fly with 15 pairs of eyes.
15. The cloning of Sheep Dolly.
16. The cow Rose that produces human milk.
17. The cloning reproduction of the human being.
18. The bioethical question of arms.
19. The indiscriminate and careless use of nuclear energy.
Immature scientists avoid discussing ends. They only discuss means. Therein, the maturity of Cosmoethics, which is still completely inexistent, should come into play. Science, per se, does not have an identity. It has to be free and prospective. The manner in which we use science is very important, as is its ethical utilization (cosmoethics).
(continue next post#2)