Originally posted by
Aianawa
This may help with understanding >
Brother, Brother, Brother... Even though this is a 27-minute video, I needed no more than 2 minutes and 14 seconds to see what this video
really is about. And the painful conclusion I've come to is that you're not seeing it, because you have already been choosing sides ─ whether consciously or subconsciously ─ ever since the
QAnon joke became a popular meme within this so-called alternative community. So let me break this down for you...
Robert Mueller has given a testimony about his investigation in which he stated that just because he didn't have any evidence that Donald Trump was complicit in the corruption doesn't mean that Trump would be innocent. So far so good, but what the interviewer in this video above is hoping to achieve here ─ and
why he's interviewing this lady ─ is that Mueller would be morally convicted for having made that statement, because the interviewer is
partial to Trump and/or the Republican Party. And that's why he's interviewing this woman now.
What the woman herself is saying is that Mueller would have turned justice upside down by
supposedly claiming that Trump should prove his innocence. No, that's not what Mueller was claiming at all, but this woman talks as a legal expert ─ which she is, but I mean that she's doing it
with deliberation ─ because she is being granted airtime from an obviously known and to-her-sympathetic interviewer, and she herself may also be partial to Trump. In other words, it is carefully crafted propaganda, and you are once again falling for it and taking it for neutral and objective news.
This entire interview is simply meant to discredit Robert Mueller, period.
What Robert Mueller said was not that Trump has to prove his innocence, but that Mueller was restricted in his duty by the US constitution ─ because said constitution forbids that a sitting president would be investigated/charged ─ and that therefore the fact that he could not find anything to charge Trump with doesn't mean that Trump would be innocent. That's
all Mueller was saying ─ and I've watched his entire speech while listening very carefully to what he said and implied. Robert Mueller is no fool, and he would certainly not suggest that Trump
must prove his innocence. But to a right-winger who's partial to Donald Trump and his politics, that's what Mueller's words will sound like, because Mueller had the nerve to make
an innuendo, and so they're feeling attacked, and they must now defend their precious
Agent Orange™.
But of course ─ and I know you ─ you will reject this analysis again, because I am
not a Trump fan, and I'm exposing the propaganda for what it is. And
you don't want to hear that.