Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 24 of 24

Thread: Autism Media Channel

  1. #16
    Member on Sabbatical United States WantDisclosure's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd April 2017
    Location
    Northern Virginia, USA
    Posts
    1,355
    Thanks
    1,544
    Thanked 5,576 Times in 1,306 Posts
    Quote Originally posted by WantDisclosure View Post
    Although I researched Andrew Wakefield years ago, this controversy has caused me to have to focus on his saga again in order to defend him.
    Defending a person who has been obviously smeared by professional propagandists such as the person interviewed by Jon Rappoport in his work The Matrix Revealed is an almost hopeless task; it's like going up against the powers that be oneself. People get killed doing that. Not that I'm in any danger from them. But the fear and confusion they've created is a huge foe.

    Hopefully, though, a few more people will become aware of Jon Rappoport's good work and will start making a difference themselves by releasing themselves from the matrix.
    Last edited by WantDisclosure, 23rd February 2019 at 12:19.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to WantDisclosure For This Useful Post:

    Dreamtimer (23rd February 2019)

  3. #17
    Super Moderator United States Dreamtimer's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th April 2015
    Location
    Patapsco Valley
    Posts
    9,219
    Thanks
    51,445
    Thanked 41,137 Times in 9,136 Posts
    I'm curious if you can tell the difference between a personal smear and a criticism of a person's words or works? The two are quite different, but I can't tell if you know that, WD.

  4. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Dreamtimer For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (23rd February 2019), Elen (24th February 2019), Kathy (23rd February 2019), Kitsune (9th May 2019), tarka the duck (24th February 2019), WantDisclosure (23rd February 2019)

  5. #18
    Member on Sabbatical United States WantDisclosure's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd April 2017
    Location
    Northern Virginia, USA
    Posts
    1,355
    Thanks
    1,544
    Thanked 5,576 Times in 1,306 Posts
    Quote Originally posted by Dreamtimer View Post
    I'm curious if you can tell the difference between a personal smear and a criticism of a person's words or works? The two are quite different, but I can't tell if you know that, WD.
    A smear is done to public figures.

    It is done by paid professionals.

    Criticism of a person's words or works is not a smear.

    It's just trying to get to truth.

    A smear is done by professionals who are trying to hide the truth on behalf of those they are working for. They are doing evil when they do it.

    The guy with the pseudonym on the Excerpts from Jon Rappoport's "The Matrix Revealed" tells us all about how propagandists function. Apparently, in retirement, his conscience caused him to need to bear his soul to Jon Rappoport, and thus, the world.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to WantDisclosure For This Useful Post:

    Dreamtimer (23rd February 2019)

  7. #19
    Super Moderator United States Dreamtimer's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th April 2015
    Location
    Patapsco Valley
    Posts
    9,219
    Thanks
    51,445
    Thanked 41,137 Times in 9,136 Posts
    Well, now that I know how you define it, it may be easier to understand why you dismiss things out of hand and refuse to answer questions.

    I believe your perspective leads you to pre-judge without understanding what others are saying.

  8. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Dreamtimer For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (23rd February 2019), Elen (23rd February 2019), Kathy (23rd February 2019), tarka the duck (24th February 2019), WantDisclosure (23rd February 2019)

  9. #20
    Member on Sabbatical United States WantDisclosure's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd April 2017
    Location
    Northern Virginia, USA
    Posts
    1,355
    Thanks
    1,544
    Thanked 5,576 Times in 1,306 Posts
    Quote Originally posted by Dreamtimer View Post
    Well, now that I know how you define it, it may be easier to understand why you dismiss things out of hand and refuse to answer questions.
    If I were to take seriously a smear and get involved in a back and forth over it, I would be wasting my time and energy on absolute nonsense.

    Not a wise thing for anyone to do.

  10. #21
    Senior Member NotAPretender's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd April 2017
    Posts
    3,946
    Thanks
    15,391
    Thanked 17,502 Times in 3,944 Posts
    hmm, maybe, but where do we draw a line between quackery and juevos. It isn't a fine line it is wide as...sumpin'

    My personal interaction with and observations of DNA have not been positive. He is more than a little misanthropic.
    "We are one thought away from changing the world!"

  11. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to NotAPretender For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (23rd February 2019), Dreamtimer (24th February 2019), tarka the duck (24th February 2019)

  12. #22
    Administrator Aragorn's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2015
    Location
    Middle-Earth
    Posts
    13,859
    Thanks
    61,481
    Thanked 57,516 Times in 13,847 Posts
    Quote Originally posted by WantDisclosure View Post
    The guy with the pseudonym on the Excerpts from Jon Rappoport's "The Matrix Revealed" tells us all about how propagandists function. Apparently, in retirement, his conscience caused him to need to bear his soul to Jon Rappoport, and thus, the world.
    Here's a sincere question for you, and I hope you will contemplate the answer very carefully before you post it... What makes you think that a guy capable of doing all the things he says he's done ─ and for the record, I'm talking of John Rappoport's "whistleblower" here ─ would even have a conscience to begin with?

    And I'll help you on your way too. You don't engage in that kind of stuff unless you are a psychopath, and psychopathy is a neurological condition that one is born with and that one will die with. They are people without a conscience because they lack the neurological structures in their brain responsible for empathy, sympathy, remorse, shame and genuine interpersonal love, and this condition is neither treatable nor curable. Every psychopath is also a narcissist, although not every narcissist is a psychopath.

    So the bottom line is that if you're dealing with someone who's coming out of the closet about his sociopathic behavior ─ which by definition includes lying and manipulation ─ then chances are very big that his "coming out" is in and of itself another one of his lies and manipulative schemes. And thus, this guy could simply be taking John Rappoport for a ride.

    It's happening to other people within this so-called alternative community all the time. Just look at Kerry Cassidy and all the kooky stuff she's being coming out with lately, not to mention that her go-to guy these days for confirmation of "her sources" is none other than Simon Parkes, a known liar, pervert, psychopath and money-hungry opportunist ─ he threatened to sue Malc for GB £12'000 in April 2015 because people here were talking about him on a members-only thread, and he had some of his groupies from Project Avalon join up here incognito and copy stuff from that thread back to him. I was one of the people who had been talking about Simon Parkes on that thread ─ this was still before I became a staff member here ─ and Parkes also threatened to sue me, as well as that he had also already threatened former Project Avalon member Laura Heath earlier that he was going to sue her for even daring to talk about him in public while she hadn't even mentioned his name or given away any pointers as to whom she was talking about.

    One of the major problems with the so-called whistleblowers of this equally so-called "alternative community" is that the ones spreading misinformation are all scratching each other's backs, unless they think they can gain a larger following from declaring one of the other "whistleblowers" a liar and then substituting that other individual's narrative for their own.

    This is exactly what happened between Corey Goode and Shane "The Ruiner" Bales. They had known each other earlier, and they used to be friends. But then Shane ─ who had studied Corey's narrative, as well as that of Simon Parkes and other "alt community" celebrities ─ decided to declare Corey a liar and substitute Corey's narrative for another one that was based upon Corey's story, and that of Simon Parkes, and of a few other of these "celebrities". And ─ trust me on this ─ Shane is a manipulative and narcissistic sociopath.

    Here's another example. Corey Goode was supposedly helping out the people who had been used and/or abused by Simon Parkes. I myself was also involved with that endeavor, and it was indirectly one of the reasons why I was banned from Project Avalon ─ Laura, whom I spoke of higher up, was banned from Project Avalon within 24 hours after I was. Corey seemed adamant about bringing Simon Parkes down ─ and he even went so far as to add more fuel to the drama by inventing some of the things he had supposedly witnessed Simon Parkes doing in video footage, including charges of pedophilia ─ but as soon as Corey found out that Simon Parkes was corroborating parts of Corey's story in an interview by Kerry Cassidy, Corey's demeanor toward the Simon Parkes affair changed.

    All of a sudden, Corey had no interest in going after Simon Parkes anymore, and he even began including Parkes' narrative about the mantis-like beings and the white Draco Reptilians (including their king, Anu) into his own narrative. Suddenly, the alleged breakaway civilization ─ an idea he got from Richard Dolan's books and lectures ─ of escaped Nazis and their descendants was now in collusion with the Dracos and their serfs, the mantis beings. Before Simon Parkes confirmed Corey's narrative, there was no mention whatsoever of any Draco reptilians or praying mantises in Corey's story. And it wasn't until David Wilcock, obsessed with the Law of One material channeled through Carla Ruckert and friends in the 1980s by an entity proclaiming to be a group soul named Ra, began projecting his own wishful thinking onto Corey's narrative that Corey began equating the alleged Blue Avians with Ra and started giving them names that all began with the prefix "Raw-".

    I'll give you yet another example: Stephen Hodges, known over at Project Avalon at the time as "Charles" and later on ─ after he joined up as a member there ─ as Atticus. He was also known over at the inPHInet forum ─ which he stole from underneath its founder, Rose ─ as Houdini. Hodges is the textbook example of a sociopath. The clinical difference between a psychopath and a sociopath is that a psychopath is born that way, while a sociopath may have a congenital inclination toward such behavior, but is primarily made, usually through a rough upbringing and living in a rough neighborhood ─ Hodges grew up as a Cockney.

    Bill Ryan still believes that Hodges was telling him the truth about his alleged involvement with "the Council of 33", who supposedly control the Illuminati ─ I for one do not ─ but one thing is clear: Hodges does qualify as a cold-blooded sociopath, and he actually prides himself in "not being right in the head". He has probably been (and may still be) involved with organized crime, and it is probably true that he has indeed killed and/or maimed some people. I for one certainly deem him capable of that ─ he's like the typical football hooligan, including the shaved head and (by his own admission) fascist sympathies.

    So if someone like that could convince a well-educated man like Bill Ryan ─ who, admittedly, does have his own woo-woo factor, even though he's not quite as naive or gullible as Kerry Cassidy ─ that he was an Illuminati "fixer" while in truth he's more likely to have been (and perhaps still be) a "fixer" for some powerful criminal organization, then it's also not unlikely that Rappoport's whistleblower would be of the same breed of psychopaths or sociopaths. Hell, it could even be Stephen Hodges for all I know ─ Hodges initially also didn't want anyone to know his true identity, and he had Bill Ryan interview him with his back toward the camera and under the pseudonym "Charles". It was only after he had joined Project Avalon as a member that his sense of grandiosity took over, and it ended with him starting a new forum of his own and taking half of Project Avalon's members with him to that other forum ─ including multiple Project Avalon staff members of the era, among whom Bill's personal assistant and former girlfriend Ruth.

    None of the above is a smear. It is a serious consideration, and given the players involved, even a very plausible one. Never take one of these "whistleblowers" at face value. A real whistleblower can substantiate and document what they say ─ Edward Snowden springs to mind ─ and they won't "embellish" the story by adding things to increase the drama factor.

    A real whistleblower generally also doesn't engage in sociopathic activities ─ they get out of whatever they were involved in before having to do those things, and they make sure they have the documents with them to prove what they're blowing the whistle on. Gary McKinnon didn't have any documents, but the over-the-top charges of alleged damage he had supposedly caused to the computers at NASA and the Pentagon and the urgency and tenacity of the US government to have him extradited to the US ─ which they later on mysteriously dropped when Gary started telling people what he had found on those computers ─ speak for themselves.

    Something to think about...





    Quote Originally posted by WantDisclosure View Post
    If I were to take seriously a smear and get involved in a back and forth over it, I would be wasting my time and energy on absolute nonsense.

    Not a wise thing for anyone to do.
    And yet you seem to have no problem publicly uttering smears about me. "Curiouser and curiouser", said Alice.
    = DEATH BEFORE DISHONOR =

  13. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Aragorn For This Useful Post:

    Chris (24th February 2019), Dreamtimer (24th February 2019), Elen (24th February 2019), Kathy (23rd February 2019), NotAPretender (23rd February 2019), tarka the duck (24th February 2019), Wind (24th February 2019)

  14. #23
    Senior Member NotAPretender's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd April 2017
    Posts
    3,946
    Thanks
    15,391
    Thanked 17,502 Times in 3,944 Posts
    I like it, Aragorn...from whence comes you?

    Good to hear from/about the Blue Chickens, too...it had been awhile...
    "We are one thought away from changing the world!"

  15. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to NotAPretender For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (23rd February 2019), Dreamtimer (24th February 2019), Elen (24th February 2019), Kathy (23rd February 2019), tarka the duck (24th February 2019)

  16. #24
    Senior Member tarka the duck's Avatar
    Join Date
    14th September 2013
    Posts
    123
    Thanks
    1,290
    Thanked 689 Times in 123 Posts
    Quote Originally posted by WantDisclosure View Post
    ... a British lady now apparently living in the U.S. Polly Tommey, a mother of an autistic child, has a YouTube channel AutismMediaChannel.
    Guess who is the Executive Director of The Autism Media Channel Yep, Andy W.
    https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/c...61787/officers

    And it went the same way as all the other 'companies' and 'businesses' and 'NFPs' he's
    started up and dissolved over the years. This one ceased in 2013.

  17. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to tarka the duck For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (25th February 2019), Chris (24th February 2019), Dreamtimer (25th February 2019), Elen (25th February 2019), Kathy (26th February 2019), Kitsune (9th May 2019), NotAPretender (24th February 2019)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •