Next USA President - Marianne Williamson

[Wind]

She is 67 was a surprise.

I would say that she looks maybe 20-30 years younger than that, a surprise indeed!

[Chuckie]

gotta be some of that Hollywood magic going on...when watching her video here, I was thinking it was 'surprising' that she spoke of 'seeing' some things from the 60's and 70's. It occurred to me then that she was 'well-preserved' for an oldie.

[Chester]

She is 67 was a surprise.

S is the 19th letter

o is the 15th letter

u is the 21st letter

l is the 12th letter

add 'em up = 67

Soul

[Aragorn]

I would say that she looks maybe 20-30 years younger than that, a surprise indeed!

It's her inner beauty that shines through.

[Aianawa]

S is the 19th letter

o is the 15th letter

u is the 21st letter

l is the 12th letter

add 'em up = 67

Soul

Xlent Sync as just did another post saying sowl 4 Soul

[Elen]

Xlent Sync as just did another post saying sowl 4 Soul

I think you just changed her age

[Aragorn]

S is the 19th letter

o is the 15th letter

u is the 21st letter

l is the 12th letter

add 'em up = 67

Soul

Xlent Sync as just did another post saying sowl 4 Soul

I think you just changed her age

Yeah, he made her two years older.

[Wind]

Here's the whole talk with Russell Brand.

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mP4As8FJAc

[Chester]

Marianne Williamson was born in the great state of Texas which is a state within the 50 great United States of America on July 8, 1952 and is currently (as of the day I am writing this post) sixty seven (67) years old.

see here

I will be writing her in if she doesn't get the nomination.
I have had it with the rest.

[Aragorn]

Marianne Williamson was born in the great state of Texas which is a state within the 50 great United States of America on July 8, 1952 and is currently (as of the day I am writing this post) sixty seven (67) years old.

see here

I will be writing her in if she doesn't get the nomination.
I have had it with the rest.

What does that mean, Sam, "writing her in"? Does that mean that you can nominate her yourself beyond the will of the party or something?

If such a procedure exists in the USA, then I'm not familiar with it. We certainly don't have that over here, but then again, Belgium is a particracy, i.e. it's the parties who decide on everything, even who will become prime minister. The people can vote for a particular person, but those votes are not binding, because the parties have to form a coalition first and only then will they decide who they're going to put on the proverbial throne ─ no reference to the monarch of course, whose right to the throne is a matter of the line of succession.

[Chester]

It means that if someone is not listed on the ballot, you can write their name in. A space is provided for such.

This link's first definition covers it - here

I am familiar with the type of government you have over there in Belgium.

[Aragorn]

It means that if someone is not listed on the ballot, you can write their name in. A space is provided for such.

This link's first definition covers it - here

Oh okay, thanks for explaining.

I am familiar with the type of government you have over there in Belgium.

Well right now we still don't have one after the elections in May. The results were so different between the Flanders region and the Walloon region that we're looking at an incompatible coalition. In the Flanders, the far-right has won, and they are Flemish-nationalists, while in the Walloon region, the socialists have won, and they are unionists and royalists. The respective regions can form their own coalitions, but it's the federal level where they cannot attain a consensus, for obvious reasons.

The way this country is governed is a joke anyway. Sadly enough, the joke is on the people.

[Chester]

Oh okay, thanks for explaining.



Well right now we still don't have one after the elections in May. The results were so different between the Flanders region and the Walloon region that we're looking at an incompatible coalition. In the Flanders, the far-right has won, and they are Flemish-nationalists, while in the Walloon region, the socialists have won, and they are unionists and royalists. The respective regions can form their own coalitions, but it's the federal level where they cannot attain a consensus, for obvious reasons.

The way this country is governed is a joke anyway. Sadly enough, the joke is on the people.

The more and more I study geopolitics as well as regional and national politics, the more and more I focus upon that which is not so apparent to the general public but that which (IMO) has far greater impact upon all life on this planet (and maybe beyond) and it is the occulted but powerful structures (such as the Luciferiam Illumed and Nutty) that permeate the known structures (such as militaries, intelligence agencies, mafias, global organizations such as the World Bank or the IMF or the United Nations or the CFR, the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderbergers, etc.) and how they roll out their agendas via compliant participants such as "news" media organizations, Hollywood, social media and how all of this has been made known for decades by folks like David Icke (just to name one!), and yet... we, as sheeple, continue to make the same mistakes over and over and over...

Its really hard to feel sorry for us. Its even harder to fight from the bottom up (which is what we are doing when we are arguing all this political BS at the level of point by point - something I have been very guilty of... but far more so in the past.)

At least with Marianne Williamson, we would have someone in a position of making a difference that gets it by understanding it all begins with consciousness and at the individual level, with one's own individuated consciousness. THAT is the staring point (IMO) if we ever have a chance to see a real change. If we don't have political leaders that understand this, the Illumed and Nutty continue in their winning ways, that I guarantee. In fact, we have always been their most powerful henchmen in this regard.

[Aragorn]

At least with Marianne Williamson, we would have someone in a position of making a difference that gets it by understanding it all begins with consciousness and at the individual level, with one's own individuated consciousness. THAT is the staring point (IMO) if we ever have a chance to see a real change. If we don't have political leaders that understand this, the Illumed and Nutty continue in their winning ways, that I guarantee. In fact, we have always been their most powerful henchmen in this regard.

And that, Brother, is why I support her, and why I'm keeping my fingers crossed that she may become the next president of the USA.

[Fred Steeves]

I will be writing her in if she doesn't get the nomination.
I have had it with the rest.

Aw, no love for my girl Tulsi?