War Drummer quotes Q post 2299 "Define Treason", but actually the Q posts have been upgraded. So, the actually post that he is referring to is Q post 2300....
. R .
RED OCTOBER
. D .
Justice K confirmation
DECLAS
Goodbye, Mr. Rosenstein [payment in full] https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jeff-flake-brett-kavanaugh-fbi-probe-today-elevator-protest-chris-coons-2018-09-28/
"Flake's decision came after he spoke to senators of both parties and withstood pressure from some Republicans not to take such a step. As he considered his course of action, Flake also had a conversation with Deputy Attorney General [Rod Rosenstein], who is in charge of special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation."
Define 'Treason'.
The crime of betraying one's country, especially by attempting to kill the sovereign or overthrow the government.
Define 'Subversion'.
The act of subverting : the state of being subverted; especially : a systematic attempt to overthrow or undermine a government or political system by persons working secretly from within?
Think line of questions re: Sen. Graham > Justice K re: 'Enemy Combatants'.
1-800-273-8255 ==>Suicide Prevention Hotline
Operators standing by.
Q
SCI[F]
Military Intelligence.
What is 'State Secrets' and how upheld in the SC?
What must be completed to engage MI over other (3) letter agencies?
What must occur to allow for civilian trials?
Why is this relevant?
What was Flynn's background?
Why is this relevant?
Why did Adm R (NSA) meet Trump privately w/o auth?
Does POTUS know where the bodies are buried?
Does POTUS have the goods on most bad actors?
Was TRUMP asked to run for President?
Why?
By Who?
Was HRC next in line?
Was the election suppose to be rigged?
Did good people prevent the rigging?
Why did POTUS form a panel to investigate?
Has POTUS *ever* made a statement that did not become proven as true/fact?
What is POTUS in control of?
What is the one organization left that isn't corrupt?
Why does the military play such a vital role?
Why is POTUS surrounded by highly respected generals?
Who guards former Presidents?
Why is that relevant?
Who guards HRC?
Why is ANTIFA allowed to operate?
Why hasn't the MB been classified as a terrorist org?
What happens if Soros funded operations get violent and engage in domestic terrorism?
What happens if mayors/ police comms/chiefs do not enforce the law?
What authority does POTUS have specifically over the Marines?
Why is this important?
What is Mueller's background? Military?
Was Trump asked to run for President w/ assurances made to prevent tampering?
How is POTUS always 5-steps ahead?
Who is helping POTUS?
Could anyone explain to me why they consider globalism preferable to nationalism?
As explained by Chris, nationalism is the false belief that one's own nation is better than other nations. It is essentially a weakened form of racial prejudice.
Now, when it comes to globalism, things are a little more complicated. There are two types of globalism. The type of globalism championed by the US Democrats and the European Union is an economic globalism, or perhaps put more precisely, it is a capitalist-corporatist globalism. This is the kind of thing that the Rockefellers and Soros have so far always been endorsing, as well as Bush Sr.
The other type of globalism is a humanitarian one, in which people from different cultures look past their differences and instead focus on what unites us, which is that in the end, we're all brothers and sisters. This type of globalism does not necessarily require any kind of government. It is a globalism of the people, not of the bankers or of the politicians. And the people who support this type of globalism have so far always been vehemently protesting against the other kind of globalism — the one where the whole world becomes a single market place and everything is controlled by multinational corporations (which includes but is not limited to the banks).
Both nationalism and the capitalist/corporatist globalism have fascist traits. Fascism is a form of government where the power rests in the hand of private corporations, and whereby politicians are merely shills for these private corporations. The only difference between nationalism and corporatist globalism is that with nationalism, the fascism stays within the nation's borders, whereas corporatist globalism seeks to conquer and subjugate the world, and then turn that into a single nation.
The other kind of globalism — the one I personally support — is egalitarian in nature, because it focuses on what makes us human, rather than upon what pleases the business world.
Am loving your sharing and material and hope others ( either side or neutral Q wise ) get a better welcome than you have so far. Hug n welcome back from me and atm imo more people are seeing n seeking safe lighthouses forum wise.
Originally posted by turiya
Hey Fred, good of you to leave a post for me.
Yes, of course. This is the way of the dualistic world in which we live. The pendulum swings from one extreme to the other extreme. As Ba-ba-Ra has said in a recent message to me, we are witnessing the fall of one Deep State & the rise of another. This could very well be. Certainly, Donald Trump may very well have meant what he said during his inauguration speech...
"We are not merely transferring power from one administration to another, or from one party to another. But we are transferring power from Washington DC and giving it back to you - The People." -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1FPra6JK_M
There will always be the question as who will come behind him. Much can be done to try to keep the nefarious individuals from seizing power - Term limits, preventing voter fraud, the lobbyist bribes, insider trading, etc. The best individual that I can see coming as a follow-up would be Rand Paul. But certainly, the pendulum is bound to swing. There is momentum behind it. Just have to see how that plays itself out. The world will continue to churn long after you & I have disappeared from the scene.
But, when it comes to the false accusations... oh, I see what was written initially has been retracted... Yes, emotions should be checked at the door before entering to comment...
Regarding Kiwi...
I know there have been some PA members that were banned temporarily & permanently (retired), others had come to decide not to post again on the forum after Bill Ryan's crying-baby victimhood tantrum that he threw - he simply disliked what was taking place. Funny he called the Qanon thing a 'cult'.
As, because of Bill Ryan's past experience with Scientology, and seeing how much of the membership were flocking to hit the "Thank You" button - giving much adoration to Bill, I've often considered that all the attention may be effecting Bill's reasoning skills, and that, in a way, it looked to be somewhat of a cult that I happened to fall in with.... I never felt comfortable with hitting that "Thank You" button. His over-the-top moralistic attitude - banning people & unsubscribing members for trivial things - comes from his Scientology conditioning / brainwashing days with that crowd.
I think Bill saw what was happening with Q as something that was not under his control. I think he felt that it had to stop. He had no interest in researching what was being posted by Q, to see for himself whether the phenom was indeed a military intelligence operation. In order to come see if it indeed was, you had to do the research. There have been plenty of Q - proofs to show that it surely is.
Bill initially came at me because he didn't like my reply. Bill threatened to ban me. My response was essentially that one can find cults just about everywhere you look in society, if that is what you are looking for. My example was when I went to the gym to workout, there was a time when I tried to change the channel from the CNN news station to another news channel. Dozens of people threw a fit, expressed there anger to my changing it to a different news station. In a sense, this can also be considered to be called a cult - the CNN cult (if you will) of people that are hooked on watching that particular type of propaganda programming.
After this, a couple others were temporarily banned. Kiwi got his third strike warning. I am also riding on my third strike warning. All of us had initially be contacted by several other forum members wanting us to come back. Personally, I had previously contributed to the PA forum several times in the past. With Bill's basically calling me an 'unbalanced' individual, I felt... "Well, enough of that."
From ex-wife Christine's information, Bill has used the PA contributions to pay his own bills. I choose not to support him or his forum in any way, shape or form, now.
I was considering to contribute to this forum... went to see it would accept Paypal, but the button doesn't work. I know that you had a thread here discussing how to get more members to stay afloat. Well, after Aragorn's well scripted post, I think I will pass on that notion.
Don't know what the other members are up to.... edina is gearing up to walk across the Appalachians. Last I heard from Kiwi is that he's enjoying nature for a change from the internet. MM (lost her moderator position over this) is focusing on local issues where she lives (Arizona). In the meantime, we'll just have to see how long I last here.
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Aianawa For This Useful Post:
Chris (20th October 2018), Emil El Zapato (20th October 2018), JRS (21st October 2018), Melidae (20th October 2018), modwiz (20th October 2018), turiya (20th October 2018)
Anonymous 19 Jan 2018 - 5:46:59 PM
>>97705
was that our "wargames" i.e. get us meme troops in a live-fire drill?
>>97724
Shall we play a game?
How about a nice game of chess?
WarGames.
Double meaning.
[CLAS-5849]
Fake incoming missile alert [Defcon 1].
We know all.
TRUST.
Q
Is President Trump really, BRILLIANT? What exactly is 4D chess? The game BRILLIANT people play!
(Oct 15, 2018)
MZ.
RT.
Big meeting.
Cell phones left at door.
+8
5 political
1 former intel dir
Mask & Spin
IDEN friendly ‘insiders’
MSM support +talking points
Shift narrative
FAIL
We hear you.
We have the algorithm.
Thank you @ Snowden.
Learn chess.
Down she goes.
Nobody escapes this.
NOBODY.
Q
Shall we play a game?
Find the spider(s) and build the web (the ‘map’).
Remember, they consider you to be the fly (specifically, the ‘feeder’).
Remember, they never thought she was going to lose.
Therefore, they never thought investigations and/or public interest into their criminal acts would be exposed/investigated.
Therefore, they never thought they had anything to fear.
Therefore, they openly showcase their symbolism.
Therefore, they were sloppy.
Hussein’s last speech in Chicago re: ‘scandal free’.
Why did he continually emphasize that phrase?
As a backup, they infiltrated and control the narrative (the ‘MSM’).
As a backup, they install only those on the team.
As a backup, they blackmail those that aren’t.
As a backup, they defined ‘conspiracy’ as crazy/mentally unstable and label anything ‘true’ as such.
This works given most of what they engage in is pure evil and simply unbelievable (hard to swallow).
The ‘fix’ has always been in – no matter which party won the election (-JFK (killed)/Reagan(shot)).
This was always the promise made to those who played the game (willingly or otherwise) (i.e., they would never lose power).
Power of the (3) letter agencies.
Power over the US Military (WW dominance to push against other nations and install like-kind).
These people are really stupid.
Follow the husbands.
Another Hint:
Ian Cameron
McKinsey & Company
Clowns In America.
Dr. Emmett J. Rice.
Federal Reserve.
Everyone is connected.
How about a nice game of chess?
Q
Last edited by turiya, 20th October 2018 at 21:45.
As explained by Chris, nationalism is the false belief that one's own nation is better than other nations. It is essentially a weakened form of racial prejudice.
Now, when it comes to globalism, things are a little more complicated. There are two types of globalism. The type of globalism championed by the US Democrats and the European Union is an economic globalism, or perhaps put more precisely, it is a capitalist-corporatist globalism. This is the kind of thing that the Rockefellers and Soros have so far always been endorsing, as well as Bush Sr.
The other type of globalism is a humanitarian one, in which people from different cultures look past their differences and instead focus on what unites us, which is that in the end, we're all brothers and sisters. This type of globalism does not necessarily require any kind of government. It is a globalism of the people, not of the bankers or of the politicians. And the people who support this type of globalism have so far always been vehemently protesting against the other kind of globalism — the one where the whole world becomes a single market place and everything is controlled by multinational corporations (which includes but is not limited to the banks).
Both nationalism and the capitalist/corporatist globalism have fascist traits. Fascism is a form of government where the power rests in the hand of private corporations, and whereby politicians are merely shills for these private corporations. The only difference between nationalism and corporatist globalism is that with nationalism, the fascism stays within the nation's borders, whereas corporatist globalism seeks to conquer and subjugate the world, and then turn that into a single nation.
The other kind of globalism — the one I personally support — is egalitarian in nature, because it focuses on what makes us human, rather than upon what pleases the business world.
Thank you for the response, Aragorn.
I still don't comprehend where notion of nationalism you and Chris are talking about is coming from. From my perspective it is like 'feeding your own family before feeding the world'. The US spends billions + of dollars to support other nations, and yet here at home there is a growing poverty and an infrastructure that is falling apart. It just makes more sense to me to take care of our own first. I liken it to a young mother that gives so much of herself to her family that she soon has nothing left to give...she has to learn to take care of herself first in order to have something to give to others. That being said, there is nothing preventing us as a people from uniting with others around the world...except governments with their own agendas that has nothing to do with what the people want.
Of the two forms of globalism you speak of...I think we can agree that the NWO form of globalism is totally unacceptable. But before we can reach the humanitarian globalism you mention, wouldn't we have to get rid of the Soros' and Rothchilds' and all who seek power and control over others? You know, the ones that have the resources to force their will on others without their consent.
I see getting from where we are today and where we desire to be as a process.