Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Ancient Iron Artifacts Have “Otherworldly” Origins

  1. #1
    Retired Member United States
    Join Date
    13th September 2013
    Location
    Dixieland - USA
    Posts
    1,030
    Thanks
    642
    Thanked 6,928 Times in 1,027 Posts

    Ancient Iron Artifacts Have “Otherworldly” Origins

    The discovery and extraction of metals in early times had an immeasurable impact on human development. Thus, modern historians recognize the three primary periods of human growth and development as the Stone Age, followed by the Bronze Age, during which metals like tin, lead, and bronze came into use. Finally, the Iron Age saw more advanced smelting processes which, as the name entails, allowed the widespread use of iron.

    However, for some time there has been question over the appearance of iron artifacts that clearly dated to the Bronze Age period, and hence the question, were there attempts at smelting iron that occurred in earlier times?

    Recently, a French study which examined the origins of various Bronze Age artifacts came to a rather unique determination about this lasting mystery: and it involves the fact that virtually all tools dating back to this period “have otherworldly origins.”

    The study, titled “Bronze Age iron: Meteoritic or not? A chemical strategy,” concludes that iron samples dating from the Bronze Age are meteoritic; in other words, they come from meteors that were present on Earth in ancient times, having traveled here from outer space. Hence, speculations over the years which assert that “precocious smelting during the Bronze Age” might have taken place seem to have been refuted, according to the study’s authors.




    Smelting processes as we know them today would have come into use primarily around 1200 BC, which marked the beginning of the Iron Age. Nonetheless, some smelting technology had been in use in the Old World much earlier, dating back as much as 6,000 to 8,000 years ago with tin and lead, followed by bronze and copper a few thousand years later. Such early smelting processes wouldn’t account for a number of Bronze Age iron artifacts on record, and thus, it seemed more likely that the source materials had come from meteorites instead.

    In order to prove this, the French study chose to employ a geochemical approach using Iron, Cobalt, and Nickel analyses, a combination of which “permits to differentiate terrestrial from extraterrestrial irons.”




    According to the study’s lead author, Albert Jambon from the the National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS) in France, “Meteoritic irons, Bronze Age iron artifacts, ancient terrestrial irons and lateritic ores” were examined in the study, which helped determine that irons and iron ores of modern provenance “are shown to exhibit a different relationship in an [Iron, Cobalt, and Nickel] array,” when compared with those from the presumed meteoritic Bronze Age irons. In other words, all of the Bronze Age samples were consistent with metals acquired from meteorites.

    Among the artifacts that were tested in the study were a dagger, a bracelet, and a famous headrest that once belonged to King Tutankhamun, who reigned in Egypt from 1332–1323 BC. Axes and pendants from Syria and China, and an assortment of other Bronze Age artifacts were also used in the study.


    The paper appeared in the December 2017 edition of the Journal of Archaeological Science.





    Source: http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2017/1...rldly-origins/


    peace...

  2. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to skywizard For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (23rd December 2017), Dreamtimer (26th December 2017), Dumpster Diver (22nd December 2017), Elen (23rd December 2017), Emil El Zapato (23rd December 2017), Greenbarry (28th December 2017), Juniper (23rd December 2017), Kathy (24th December 2017), modwiz (23rd December 2017), sandy (23rd December 2017)

  3. #2
    Retired Member United States
    Join Date
    2nd December 2015
    Location
    American Southwest (currently)
    Posts
    2,602
    Thanks
    12,814
    Thanked 13,156 Times in 2,620 Posts
    Another nicely put together ‘mini study’ on this topic. Even though I may not have a comment, I enjoy reading these threads.

  4. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Dumpster Diver For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (23rd December 2017), Dreamtimer (26th December 2017), Elen (23rd December 2017), Emil El Zapato (23rd December 2017), Juniper (23rd December 2017), Kathy (24th December 2017), modwiz (23rd December 2017), sandy (23rd December 2017)

  5. #3
    Retired Member
    Join Date
    23rd December 2013
    Posts
    938
    Thanks
    2,656
    Thanked 5,320 Times in 939 Posts
    There's that 'Handbag' again. Energy Device or what??? As for the use of metals by Humans - I have questions about how they learned, initially, to work with certain metals. Who was the Teacher? Who was the first to use metals? How did the first Person/People learn to use metals, was it by accident? It seems too specific an art to just be knowledge upon which someone simply stumbled ....

    Much Peace & Much Respect - Amanda

  6. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Amanda For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (24th December 2017), Dreamtimer (26th December 2017), Dumpster Diver (24th December 2017), Elen (24th December 2017), Kathy (24th December 2017), modwiz (23rd December 2017)

  7. #4
    Senior Member Emil El Zapato's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd April 2017
    Location
    Earth I
    Posts
    12,236
    Thanks
    36,751
    Thanked 43,177 Times in 11,952 Posts
    Actually, that study would tend to discount the ancient alien hypothesis suggesting that early cultures simply made good use of available metals deposited by meteoritic impacts. It might even suggest that the 'idea' of processing metals might have occurred because of the naturally occurring mixtures.
    “El revolucionario: te meteré la bota en el culo"

  8. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Emil El Zapato For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (24th December 2017), Dumpster Diver (24th December 2017), Elen (24th December 2017), Kathy (24th December 2017)

  9. #5
    Retired Member United States
    Join Date
    2nd December 2015
    Location
    American Southwest (currently)
    Posts
    2,602
    Thanks
    12,814
    Thanked 13,156 Times in 2,620 Posts
    Quote Originally posted by Amanda View Post
    There's that 'Handbag' again. Energy Device or what??? As for the use of metals by Humans - I have questions about how they learned, initially, to work with certain metals. Who was the Teacher? Who was the first to use metals? How did the first Person/People learn to use metals, was it by accident? It seems too specific an art to just be knowledge upon which someone simply stumbled ....

    Much Peace & Much Respect - Amanda
    They were obviously Amazons...after they made their swords and spears, they made a few handbag ‘whimsies’ to amuse themselves.

  10. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Dumpster Diver For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (24th December 2017), Dreamtimer (26th December 2017), Elen (24th December 2017), Emil El Zapato (24th December 2017), Kathy (24th December 2017)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •