Paladin interviews Kerry Cassidy - skies the limit

[Kathy]

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AY2vde9mPFw

"Streamed live on 26 Oct 2017 by Project Camelot

Paladin, White Hat and forensic financial investigator will be interviewing Kerry Thursday night."

[Fred Steeves]

Jeez, is that the best picture they could find of Kerry? She looks like she's about to vomit...

[Emil El Zapato]

She looks stressed as hell...

I wonder if she 'likes' him...

[Dumpster Diver]

She looks stressed as hell...

I wonder if she 'likes' him...

Bad photo. I’m half way through and so far she exhibits no sign of stress at all. Typical Kerry. She was much more stressed in the Robert David Steele interview.

[enjoy being]

Going for the au naturale look I see.
This woman really gives me the heebies, that image sort of describes that, so great pic.

[Dumpster Diver]

Guess I gotta say it. Most of the men on these shows look like a bunch of paedos to me, but nobody says anything. Some poor gal gets on, has a poor photo, bad hair day or whatever and gets raked over the coals. Kerry had some sort of alt-world attack happen about 6 or so months ago and everyone is on her for looking bad. For me it's all about the info, to heck with the photos unless they are showing some sort of stress induced posing which could be a comment on their truthfulness. And I'm not seeing that in this interview.

[enjoy being]

...yeah well I was THAT close to not bothering to say anything, for as the adage goes.... I don't have anything nice to say about her.
Apologies I'll stay out of this thread.

[Fred Steeves]

Kerry had some sort of alt-world attack happen about 6 or so months ago

It's far more likely she suffered a mild stroke, something along those lines.

[Emil El Zapato]

Bad photo. I’m half way through and so far she exhibits no sign of stress at all. Typical Kerry. She was much more stressed in the Robert David Steele interview.

Hey, you can't disagree with me. Between you and I, she always seems stressed. (And I think she has a 'relationship' with this guy). There was nothing new in the entire video, so I think the reason for it was a 'professional' 'get together'. Most of it, is total fantasy, in any case.

[Dumpster Diver]

It's far more likely she suffered a mild stroke, something along those lines.

Well, she said in an interview several months back she suffer an attack of some kind, but it was not a stroke. She's a bit young for a stroke, BTW.

[Dumpster Diver]

Hey, you can't disagree with me. Between you and I, she always seems stressed. (And I think she has a 'relationship' with this guy). There was nothing new in the entire video, so I think the reason for it was a 'professional' 'get together'. Most of it, is total fantasy, in any case.

Ok, I'll have to ask which part you see as fantasy as the greater part of the interview resonates with my findings.

BTW, I am not a KC fanboy. Frankly, I see her as having colluded with BR and thusly somewhat suspect but in many of her interviews she has had, I find myself agreeing with her at least partially. Her viewpoint on flat earth has me reviewing my non-Euclidian Geometry and how some folks may view 3D differently as we ascend into 4D. Reason I say this is the Adm Byrd flight:

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/t...a_hueca_2d.htm

and books like the Smoky God:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Smoky_God
http://www.ourhollowearth.com/SGContents.htm

not to mention all the Norse Mythology and their land of Asgard which is certainly close to Agartha of Cory Goode lore.

My research shows there is something there, and the geometry is twisted/changed in some way to allow the occasional passage of folks over the poles, certainly the North Pole. Remote viewers see things in weird ways and it can certainly look "flat" to them if you can't see things in 4D (or sometimes even in 3D).

[Emil El Zapato]

Ok, you win...but I think only time will tell what is and what isn't. Non-Euclidean Geometry is for sure a lucrative mathematical source for conjecture. I, for one, will remain convinced (until I see one something appear and disappear before my eyes) that the truth is greater than what we see as consenus reality but not as fantastic as the imagination can conjure in absence of concealed truths. We can believe literally anything in a vacuum of hard experience and hard facts. I don't mean to be a killjoy, it is just what I believe.

[Aragorn]

Well, she said in an interview several months back she suffer an attack of some kind, but it was not a stroke. She's a bit young for a stroke, BTW.

I don't know about that. She's 51, so it's possible.

[Fred Steeves]

Well, she said in an interview several months back she suffer an attack of some kind, but it was not a stroke.

I know, but people in that business people tend to say a lot of things; and she has, see a good number of the other "researchers" and "whistleblower" types discussed ad nauseum on this and related forums.

She's a bit young for a stroke, BTW.

You sure about that?

[Dumpster Diver]

Ok, you win...but I think only time will tell what is and what isn't. Non-Euclidean Geometry is for sure a lucrative mathematical source for conjecture. I, for one, will remain convinced (until I see one something appear and disappear before my eyes) that the truth is greater than what we see as consenus reality but not as fantastic as the imagination can conjure in absence of concealed truths. We can believe literally anything in a vacuum of hard experience and hard facts. I don't mean to be a killjoy, it is just what I believe.

NAP, you are sorta new here, but the old hands around here at TOT have grown tired of my beating the drum on my evidence based approach based on my observations and the derivations thereof. To wit, I think many things quite probable that I hate and would rather not be true. Everything I state has a fair amount of research and reference. This may be La-La land, but I'm not a practioner of La-La.