Yay...I was a bit taken aback by his abrupt depature...love his contributions and interacting with him
That being said...I been interacting with CW in my debaucherous celebration of the last days of not being a corporate slave (I start back up tomorrow). I was way too drunk to be interacting with anyone on the second to last 5 hour CW Chanter sh!tshow, though he actually picked up the slack and schooled St Teresa/Shannon on Bill's past, which I thought was important. She is an example of someone coming in a bit late to the party...and in the most recent one I feel like I broached some of the subjects that I think are important and getting lost in the mix:
Would the 'Corey phenomenon' "exist" without PA/BR?
CW often brings up the relative "smallness" of the "truth movement"...or at least the corner of the internet it exists in.
As small as it is, it is important to those of us who come to participate. What Bill's doing now would be very important, but it's gotten to the point of mocking those that believe story like Corey's. Which would be ok, I guess...if not for the fact that no place I've ever been has enabled people to tell such stories with such protection.
If Corey was a poster at GLP since 2010, and the webmasters there decided to turn him into a "whistleblower" several years later...what would have happened?
While it's great that places like these offer "protection" for people to pretty much tell whatever story they want, the leaders must be held to the highest standards if they are not to appear hypocritical. Something I think desperately lacking from ANY discourse (especially Bill's) is why any attention came to the story in the first place. What made Corey more special than any of the dozens of others that tell there stories there in a lower key way?
The frustration I feel is that there is plenty of "evidence" out there to answer these questions. I think Christine's post is an important piece of the puzzle which is almost completely overlooked:
http://earthempaths.net/forum/phpBB3...3e1ea047#p8392
What she was doing with Corey is something a good friend I made on PA and I do with each other all the time. We speak as friends of our anamolous experiences and try to figure them out...compare notes, bounce things off of each other. We've actually come to the point where we think the best "evidence" we can contribute to this topic is stuff like his regression....the thing about our conversations is they often go over the same things over and over again...because the "real life" story doesn't evolve quickly enough to be constantly revealing "big picture" revelations the way or Corey or Charles.
I bring this up because if Christine is to be believed, that first interview wasn't too different than the phone convos I have with who I believe to be a TRUE experiencer of both "alien" crap and "agency" sh!t. She (and supposedly Corey) weren't ready for it to "go viral" (at least within this small community), according to her, she wasn't available when Bill posted (after hyping it up**) and would have not given the green light at that time.
It is true and important that Corey did latch on to the attention and did his thing after this point I want to discuss, and I agree with most peoples' view on that end of it. But the questions of "why corey?" and "why now?" seem to keep cropping up...and I wonder if the stuff I bring up doesn't show it quite clearly?
Why Corey?? ...why won't Bill address that question? He thought Corey was important enough back then, and if you look past that point (like most people seem to do), it seems "why did DW/Gaia pick up Corey is because Bill made his story more relevant than any other that was out there then
Why now?? ...that's even easier, the people that care most about the integrity of this community, the leaders, had a problem with him being in "Contact in the Desert" while he kept popping of the FaceBook of all places. Richard Dolan was at CITD, if he didn't have something out there saying he's not in the CG thing...wouldn't that sorta taint sharing using the same stage as him?
I believe the "why now" is the "leaders" saving face...Corey gets more pub than them, and whether they like it or not, the Dolans and Farrells are lumped in with them. I think these guys don't see how important it is to "disclose" their relationships, because often they have shared stages/interviews/videos with these people whose ideas that they may not want to be associated with. This is exactly what got me kicked off PA, I think...I kept pushing Bill to share his thoughts on Wilcock back when he picked Corey up. Sure, it had been years since the interviews they sat at the same table...so in my mind it should have been important to Bill to make that clear to his flock
That all lead to my thinking all these guys were in cahoots in some kind of psyop...when now I see more like CW does, some high school bullsh!t. No one wants to sh!t on anyone else's rep in fear those other peeps bringing up the sh!t they've done. And the "why now?" specifically to the community rallying around Bill's "cleaning up the community"...I suspect, because of my years of interactions with him and watching from the sideline, he found a perfect opportunity. And not that he was looking for it.
His "origin" story is as important as Corey's" He's had to answer to the Corey lovers constantly, and making a comprehensive response made a lot of sense, and he did a great job with it. I made my response to that because I think none of the Corey lovers (or newer Avalonians) had any IDEA
the way the energence of the goodET went down, and I think it is important.
I love all the tangents the thread goes off to, I think there's tons of great info to be gleaned...but I keep bringing it back to that...and ask you: is it important? Does it show a pattern that most people are taking for granted "just happens" (it is what it is
)?
Am I wrong? Does the part of the narrative I see him changing not matter? Is the narrative even being changed...or is it in my mind...and so me bringing any of this up is just "drugged out" personal attacks adding to the noise and drama?