Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Items Found on Earth Cannot Be Explained

  1. #1
    Retired Member United States
    Join Date
    13th September 2013
    Location
    Dixieland - USA
    Posts
    1,030
    Thanks
    642
    Thanked 6,928 Times in 1,027 Posts

    Items Found on Earth Cannot Be Explained

    ICA STONES


    In the early 1930s, a cultural anthropologist found hundreds of andesite stones containing depictions of prehistoric dinosaurs. The burial stones were estimated to be between 500 and 1,500 years old.

    The mysterious stones feature images, which depict open-heart surgeries, brain transplants, and some sexually graphic content. The most surprising of the etchings featured representations of a stegosaurus, brontosaurus, and other prehistoric dinosaurs.


    ARE THESE INTRICATE ROCKS, OR AN UNDISCOVERED
    SPECIES OF MAN?




    Each of the Ica stone depicts a different scene, which leaves room for a lot of interpretation. The mystery shrouding these artifacts prompted scientists to unravel the scenes behind each narrative.

    While there are no definitive answers, some researchers believe that ancient technology belonged to an extraterrestrial race. This unknown race referred to as the Gliptolihic Man, is believed to have coexisted with dinosaurs, then genetically engineered into modern man.



    Source: http://rightbrainnews.com/18-items-f...-explained/14/


    peace...

  2. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to skywizard For This Useful Post:

    Aianawa (17th February 2017), Aragorn (13th February 2017), boja (14th February 2017), Dreamtimer (14th February 2017), Elen (14th February 2017), Greenbarry (14th February 2017), Herbert (14th February 2017), Juniper (14th February 2017), modwiz (13th February 2017), sandy (14th February 2017), Woody (14th February 2017)

  3. #2
    Senior Member donk's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th December 2013
    Posts
    1,262
    Thanks
    2,045
    Thanked 6,020 Times in 1,226 Posts
    when I was in a sweat at Standing Rock, the Lakota leading it told their creation story. He said that the dinosaurs were terrorizing humans and drove their (separated, Sioux I think) 7 tribes into caves where they lived underground for some time until they were able to unite and fight back.

    I can't remember what he said separated the tribe again, but the story was told to preface the prophecy of the tribes coming together to fight a common enemy...which he suggested may the "black snake" they talk about. The black snake is not just the Dakota Access Pipeline that fits the story the best, the Pipeline is the symptom of the real black snake that is the self destructive ways of civilization

    Interesting that common dogma always looks for ways the indegenous that have endured while civilizations capable of creating the "advanced" artifacts leave very little, so little and the big ones like the pyramids are so marginalized that previously existing advanced civilization are not socially or scientifically acceptable to consider to most

  4. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to donk For This Useful Post:

    Aianawa (17th February 2017), Aragorn (14th February 2017), Dreamtimer (14th February 2017), Elen (15th February 2017), Juniper (14th February 2017)

  5. #3
    Senior Member Aianawa's Avatar
    Join Date
    18th March 2015
    Posts
    12,485
    Thanks
    45,719
    Thanked 35,452 Times in 10,162 Posts
    Quote Originally posted by skywizard View Post
    ICA STONES


    In the early 1930s, a cultural anthropologist found hundreds of andesite stones containing depictions of prehistoric dinosaurs. The burial stones were estimated to be between 500 and 1,500 years old.

    The mysterious stones feature images, which depict open-heart surgeries, brain transplants, and some sexually graphic content. The most surprising of the etchings featured representations of a stegosaurus, brontosaurus, and other prehistoric dinosaurs.


    ARE THESE INTRICATE ROCKS, OR AN UNDISCOVERED
    SPECIES OF MAN?




    Each of the Ica stone depicts a different scene, which leaves room for a lot of interpretation. The mystery shrouding these artifacts prompted scientists to unravel the scenes behind each narrative.

    While there are no definitive answers, some researchers believe that ancient technology belonged to an extraterrestrial race. This unknown race referred to as the Gliptolihic Man, is believed to have coexisted with dinosaurs, then genetically engineered into modern man.



    Source: http://rightbrainnews.com/18-items-f...-explained/14/


    peace...
    First time I have seen a kangaroo pic with dinosaurs.

  6. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Aianawa For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (17th February 2017), Dreamtimer (17th February 2017), Elen (18th February 2017)

  7. #4
    (account terminated) United States
    Join Date
    19th April 2016
    Posts
    21
    Thanks
    37
    Thanked 98 Times in 21 Posts
    http://pseudoarchaeology.org/b03-ross.html
    A site that links to almost every webpage about the Ica Stones, for and against them being a hoax.

    My favorite is the article from skeptic dictionary: http://skepdic.com/icastones.html

    And this quick one from Graham Hancock's site is good: https://grahamhancock.com/foersterb8/
    Last edited by Biff, 17th February 2017 at 03:12.

  8. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Biff For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (17th February 2017), donk (17th February 2017), Dreamtimer (17th February 2017), Elen (18th February 2017)

  9. #5
    Retired Member United States
    Join Date
    7th April 2015
    Location
    Patapsco Valley
    Posts
    14,610
    Thanks
    70,673
    Thanked 62,025 Times in 14,520 Posts
    Pseudo-archeology is kind of a funny term. I'm not sure if archeology in general suffers from the religiosity of Egyptology. There're some inherent aspects which aren't rigorously scientific.

    Neil DeGrasse Tyson loves to rag on biologists and their 'inexact' science. And he's not a biologist.

    And skeptics are not scientists. I've recently been pretty profoundly disappointed by skeptics like Shermer and Nye. They've blown it recently, more than once. Shermer has positioned himself so that he doesn't even have any burden of proof for his position. He just gets to criticize and his subjects have to defend.

    I'm not pointing a finger at the above referenced skeptics, just making a general statement.

    I would love to see serious study and analysis of the Ica Stones, whatever would end up being learned. But someone has to pay for it, eh?

  10. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dreamtimer For This Useful Post:

    Aragorn (17th February 2017), Elen (18th February 2017), sandy (18th February 2017)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •