Love this >
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7XZmugtLv4&t=310s
Printable View
I always thought that CNN stood for Kant News Network. Every single person there is a Kant. I can't even bear to look at them, the fakery is next level.
Boy am I seeing some mind changes happening, deep stuck minds blinking, oh life is great observing others suffer less.
Kant? The philosopher? I don't watch CNN so I don't get that.
I do recall that O'Keefe put out some bogus stuff that got some folks hurt. He is, in my opinion, very irresponsible. He got himself into trouble from it, as I recall.
Project Veritas is an American right-wing activist group.[1][2][3][4] The group uses "disguises and hidden cameras to uncover supposed liberal bias and corruption."[1] The group is known for producing deceptively edited videos about media organizations and left-leaning groups.[5][6][2][7][8][9] In a 2018 book on propaganda and disinformation in U.S. politics, three Harvard University scholars refer to Project Veritas as a "right-wing disinformation outfit."[10]
O'Keefe was sued for defamation by a man he wrongfully depicted as a "willing participant in an underage sex-trafficking scheme"; the suit led to a settlement in 2013, in which O'Keefe issued an apology and paid $100,000.[16]
In 2017, it was caught in a failed attempt to trick the The Washington Post into posting a fabricated story about Roy Moore.[3][17][18][2] Rather than uncritically publish a story that accused Republican candidate Moore of impregnating a teenager, The Washington Post critically examined the story that they were presented with, checked the source, assessed her credibility and ultimately found that there was no merit to her claims, and that instead Project Veritas were trying to dupe The Washington Post.[10]
O'Keefe has been barred from fundraising for Project Veritas in Florida and other states because of his federal criminal record for entering a federal building under fraudulent pretenses.[19][20]
Laughable NAP, read the message now you killed the messenger lol.
When the message comes from a known unreliable source it's only logical to question it.
I would be a fool to trust a known liar.