Yeah well, technically speaking anyway. Other than that ole Nexus is dead as a f**cking door nail. Too bad really, that was the edgiest, most cutting edge forum I've ever been part of. Back in it's day anyway, but all things must pass.
Printable View
Not much activity you mean?
Zip zero zilch, go check it out.
Ah yes, I had totally forgotten about his munching skills. But as I gather, he was doing that for Queen and Country, so he's got an excuse. ;)
For that matter, there's a rumor going round that he's been targeting McDonald's lately. Their IT staff discovered that somebody who calls himself "The One And Only Rainbow Warrior" had changed the entry on the menu for one of their products into "Chicken MalcNuggets", and that he was attempting to change the name of another product into "Big Malc". :p
:hiding:
Well, I've certainly noticed some interesting IP addresses looking at this thread since I've moved it into the public view, and they're not the usual webcrawler bots. ;)
:eyebrows: : Sherlock:
It is always great to hear that someone has beaten cancer. :victorious:
I wish Richard and Céline well, and I hope Céline will be able to sustain her health. ;) :thup:
:back to topic: :)
Lol, Aragorn. Big Malc.:lol::lol::lol:
https://scontent-lhr3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...67&oe=5A134663
Still making her smile lol
Beautiful picture, Malc. Keep smiling, both of you.:)
I'll repost my original post from the "BR's disclosure on CG" Thread as it is still very relevant:
Keeping up with the “Corydashians”
I’ve worked with the “dark side” of the military, i.e. black projects. No, I’m not MILAB (to my knowledge), and because of that work I’ve noticed a few unusual things about the latest offensive by Bill Ryan.
Firstly, he makes the argument that all whistleblowers get slapped down eventually and the fact that CG is still around makes him likely a controlled asset.
Seems like a great argument on its face, but that’s not the way warfare works (and this is a war we are engaged in, an information war). The military typically attempts to negate an enemy by, in the air, taking out the airfields rather than attacking each aircraft. Tanks? Take out the factory, rather than each individual tank. Troops coming into a battle zone? Take out the troop ship, rather than each individual soldier on the field. The pattern is: look for the nexus and block it.
The analogy in the information world is: take out the information conduit, and then each whistleblower can’t reach the public. In this instance, Project Camelot was the conduit. Why are they still functioning and for so long with so many informative whistleblowers? Using this argument, Project Camelot and the Avalon forum are most likely controlled assets or “controlled opposition” using the current terminology. So this whole CG must be a controlled asset is a BS argument especially considering BR’s background and certainly the importance of Project Camelot in the past must be examined in such a light.
Next, there is a “blamestorm” of folks coming out against CG. BR, Dolan, Fitts, Dark Journalist, and others. This is after the Greer thing last year. Concerted efforts like this look very contrived and we certainly did such in our military’s misinformation campaigns. With all the negativity pointed at CG and DW, folks just start thinking “where there is smoke, there must be fire”.
So, I think BR’s real objective is David Wilcock. Think about it. In the eyes of most folks, discredit CG and the mud splashes on DW since the two share a long running Gaia TV program and seem to be buddies.
As for Wilcock, he is providing extremely interesting and VERIFIABLE information on his program Wisdom Teachings and in his books. Information about structure of the cosmos, issues with Redshift (extremely important), physics, i.e. science as we know it. Yes, he has allied himself with CG, but what are the real facts in CG’s story? Not much. But It’s a great, entertaining Sci-Fi story! It is a fun, alt-world “Keeping up with the Kardashians” story line.
So, at the end of the day, if CG is totally discredited what have we lost? In my eyes, not much. A great SF story is about it. Do I think CG is controlled opposition? I have him at about 30%. This means I think about 70% of info coming from him is good, but much of his rating is feeding from his agreement with DW, but he is dropping due to other information coming out. DW is much better, I have him at approx. 85% and much of his rating is due to his research.
Is BR controlled opposition? I have him as rated as about a 55% chance, but that number is now rising again. That means I see about 45% of the information is good. Still slightly worthwhile. But it is worthwhile to note that 50% is a coin flip, i.e. informationally worthless.
Remember in this world of disinformation, NOBODY is 100% right or 100% wrong, but both of these types of folks would be the most useful informationally, i.e. 100% wrong is good since you can just invert everything they are saying, somewhat like the Main Stream Media. What are they pushing? Likely the opposite is true. But remember, even if someone is being truthful they can be factually wrong. Therefore, everyone who has some information is providing some element of truth and falsehood. Use your discernment (I use math and logic) to puzzle thru the blizzard of info.
still later in that thread:
AND this is EXACTLY what I think is going with Bill Ryan. He (probably) doesn't know he's being controlled. The best slaves think they are doing good.
I further went on somewhere else in this forum with the idea that Project Camelot and later the Koolaid-Kult at Avalon are honeypots to snare MILABs and other "ne'er-do-wells" from the Deep State perspective.
...going further, BR has accomplished what his leash-holders wanted: A divided up alt-world community at war with ourselves over "stupid sh!t" instead of uniting on common points.
.
Hi Myst,
I think the Catholic Church gets a bad rap in some cases. I was heavily indoctrinated as a youth but it didn't take in the fashion they would have preferred. The dichotomy between the spiritual and the practice were stark and much too much obvious. I kept the spirituality and separated out the dogmatism and personal failures of its representatives.
Malc = cult leader? Are we in Club Malc? :hilarious:
...or how about Darth Malc and his evil henchman Aragorn? They always come in twos in Star Wars...
As a matter of fact Kerry and Bill hardly ever hung out on the original PA forum and the atmosphere on PA1 was really harmonious - even mods like the notorious Richard were quite relaxed.
It was very much a 'dolphin'-forum, where no one had to be afraid to be thrown off for saying what was on his or her mind.
The new Project Avalon is a 'shark'-forum where you can be banned from, just because you're not in alignment with the the opinion of Bill & his mods, no matter how much you have contributed.
What motivates Bill Ryan?
Money, power and complete control over his flock.
:priest:
Oh, there are quite a few people on this forum in this day and age who absolutely consider me evil [*], I can tell you that much. :whstl:
The tale of the splinter and the beam, I'm afraid... ;) :tea:
[*] I did at one time — in the past decade — use the name Lucifer as one of my nicknames when I was still running that IRC network with a bunch of other people, but that was actually to scare off the scr1pt k1dd13s who were trying to DDoS us with flood/clone bots. If you are on IRC and your connection is severed or banned by an IRCop or a server/network admin, then it says so in your status console, and so in their case, it would say something like "You were banned from this network by Lucifer [~lucifer@netadmin.chatfactory.net]. (Reason: You're a lame idiot and your mommy wants her computer back.)" :p