The youtube channel has >27,765 minutes watched and 60 subscribers, with 216 videos. The facebook page has 1280 likes. The main vixra paper has 2086 Unique I.P. Downloads.
The youtube channel has >27,765 minutes watched and 60 subscribers, with 216 videos. The facebook page has 1280 likes. The main vixra paper has 2086 Unique I.P. Downloads.
The youtube channel has >28,510 minutes watched and 61 subscribers, with 222 videos. The facebook page has 1286 likes. The main vixra paper has 2088 Unique I.P. Downloads.
In this video I overview the differences between pulsars and stars. I have come to the conclusion that pulsars are not stars, they are embryonic galaxies.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z721ZeNtzdU
The youtube channel has >30,743 minutes watched and 67 subscribers, with 248 videos. The facebook page has 1308 likes. The main vixra paper has 2100 Unique I.P. Downloads.
In this paper I begin overviewing the main concepts which need to be including inside of star evolution (planet formation). I will need to hone them and add subjects which are relevant.
http://vixra.org/abs/1506.0156
The youtube channel has >33,372 minutes watched and 69 subscribers, with 264 videos. The facebook page has 1318 likes. The main vixra paper has 2127 Unique I.P. Downloads.
In this paper I begin overviewing the main concepts which need to be including inside of star evolution (planet formation). I will need to hone them and add subjects which are relevant. This is version 3 and has I think 35 pages.
http://vixra.org/abs/1506.0156
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBZQP-iDcsg
This video overviews the importance of electromagnetohydrodynamics or MHD for short, during stellar evolution.
The youtube channel has >36,248 minutes watched and 70 subscribers, with 285 videos. The facebook page has 1320 likes. The main vixra paper has 2157 Unique I.P. Downloads.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-AlLjMRI0s0
MHD Motor, Flemings Left Hand Rule, Hannes Alven, Electrolyte Movement
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0R_lXtPipo
Ionization energies, plasma recombination, GTSM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_s_NSr5HHuI
Nuclear Transformations, Pulsars, Particle Collider
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-d-Ctv7yAM
H. Ratcliffe, D. E. Scott, Stellar Metamorphosis
that does tend to be the way it is, people who become professional, whatever's have to be "right" in their field for credibility and such...
a good example I have seen is when talking with various dentists, who will adamantly argue that mercury fillings are completely safe and harmless due to their proprietary method of handling and installing them, which has been shown countless times to be utterly false, but if they ever go down the path of admitting...even to themselves, that their protocols are actually harmful to people, then they open themselves to become pariahs and having lawsuits launched against them for such malfeasance and malpractice..... so they are like the con man who has dug too deep a hole for themselves to come clean and be honest about things, and so it (the illusion) is perpetuated.
This is a very common problem we face as a species and it certainly does a lot of damage.
Thank you for the reply Zshawn. We don't have to go very far back in history to find out how destructive "experts" can be. Remember when ciggs were safe? Doctors claimed they were actually good for you! Doctors, the mass media, etc. Now look at them. Same goes with every single medical prescription across the board, vaccine, you name it. Fact is, most human endeavors are trial and error, they do great with the trial portion, but when they err, there is just too much banking on that trial on being a success that they deny it at all costs. Remember when Al Gore proclaimed back in the 1990's that the ice caps would disappear? Well, they are still there. Remember when thermisol was claimed to be safe? Okay, then why have they been systematically (quietly) been removing it?
The medical industry has so much money at stake in their trials, that to have major errors will be costly. Same with astrophysics, too much money is invested in the big bang/nebular hypothesis/neutrino mess. To admit failure for those ideas would be detrimental to the careers of the "experts" in as much as the medical/dental industries' careers. In short, its professionalism to the detriment of the progress of knowledge. This is why the way forward isn't cut and dry, it is hammered out before us. The paths taken have to be beaten, true paths before they are adopted as roads.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ft0dmZ-7a8
Outsiders vs. Insiders in the Astrophysical Community
plus, Hannes Alfven, Influences, Language Issues
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLLCJYEGbpg
The youtube channel has >38,786 minutes watched and 74 subscribers, with 296 videos. The facebook page has 1320 likes. The main vixra paper has 2186 Unique I.P. Downloads.
>39,492 whoa. Finally getting some traction. This one was funny.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TfPWro1GcKI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gee8nFMej4g
This one is for Mr. Stephen J. Crothers.
I had received a nice letter from a biochemistry graduate student 2 days ago of him telling me how he was intrigued with how simple understanding star evolution/planet formation was.
That made me feel better. This presentation goes out to one of the youtube commenters that is upset over the accretion ideas.
The Location of Accretion:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yd1lCCEw-YU
40,061 minutes watched. whoa, plus vixra main has 2195 unique I.P. downloads