Just remember, "if you teach" his information (the perennial philosophy) you are exposed to legal actions against you.
I am pointing out "content" as documented in a previous post.
Printable View
Just remember, "if you teach" his information (the perennial philosophy) you are exposed to legal actions against you.
I am pointing out "content" as documented in a previous post.
If I was to recommend something or do the revers, is this not the same, just different sides of the same coin.
If I say someone is good, truthful.
If I say someone is bad, dishonest.
It is an oppionon , both are a comment on that person, both would be about that person. There by be personal.
"Is David Wilcox any Good"............is this not inviting an oppionon?
Which undoubtedly would be personal, good, bad or indifferent.
My point something positive is as personal as something negertive.
Yet the title invites an oppionon, yet posters request nothing personal, in essence say nothing, make no comment.
Something to think about :scrhd:
The bottom line though is that an entire thread devoted to "is someone good or bad" is going to invite nothing more than subjective viewpoints, since there is no way to objectively quantify "goodness" vs "badness." So in the end, any readers of this thread are left knowing nothing further about David than they did before reading this thread... other than which members like him, which don't, and possibly which ones don't care either way.
That said, this thread will now be closed as per the OP's request. No harm, no foul. I appreciate the civility that was displayed in here. :tiphat: