bsbray
10th August 2016, 18:37
I started reading a mobi file of this book on my Kindle lately, and it's pretty impressive. It can be a bit wordy but what it's arguing is pretty profound, and dates back to the years right after Napoleon had been sent back into exile (it was apparently first published in 1819).
It's hosted on archive.org here: https://archive.org/details/historicdoubtsre02what
In Sylvie's videos for her newearth channel on YouTube she's made mention before that the wars going on around the time of Napoleon (late 1700's and beginning of the 1800's) were related and had to do with a major shift in global governance. In Fomenko's work this same time period reflects when Muscovite Tartaria, and Siberia, were conquered by the Romanovs, and Americans were moving west to push any Tartars or related tribes out of western North America as well (though Russia was actually an early colonizer of California and built forts there).
What this book argues fits in well with the New Chronology, but it came out over 150 years before Fomenko began to formulate his ideas, and almost 200 years back from the present. I don't want to give too much away because the way the argument is made is important, and the book is short, only 68 pages in pdf form counting the front matter. But the main problem the book discusses is how much information we have about Napoleon that is contradictory, vague or insufficient, especially in regards to his military campaigns and other things for which he is given responsibility. So I hope somebody else gives this book a read and gets something out of it.
It's hosted on archive.org here: https://archive.org/details/historicdoubtsre02what
In Sylvie's videos for her newearth channel on YouTube she's made mention before that the wars going on around the time of Napoleon (late 1700's and beginning of the 1800's) were related and had to do with a major shift in global governance. In Fomenko's work this same time period reflects when Muscovite Tartaria, and Siberia, were conquered by the Romanovs, and Americans were moving west to push any Tartars or related tribes out of western North America as well (though Russia was actually an early colonizer of California and built forts there).
What this book argues fits in well with the New Chronology, but it came out over 150 years before Fomenko began to formulate his ideas, and almost 200 years back from the present. I don't want to give too much away because the way the argument is made is important, and the book is short, only 68 pages in pdf form counting the front matter. But the main problem the book discusses is how much information we have about Napoleon that is contradictory, vague or insufficient, especially in regards to his military campaigns and other things for which he is given responsibility. So I hope somebody else gives this book a read and gets something out of it.