PDA

View Full Version : The Panama Papers



The One
5th April 2016, 10:03
https://www.occrp.org/images/panamapapers.jpg

A giant leak of more than 11.5 million financial and legal records exposes a system that enables crime, corruption and wrongdoing, hidden by secretive offshore companies landed in the lap of Süddeutsche Zeitung - and they decided to share with loads of other news media.

Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca’s files include the offshore holdings of drug dealers, Mafia members, corrupt politicians and tax evaders – and wrongdoing galore.

"Include 11.5 million records, dating back nearly 40 years – making it the largest leak in offshore history. Contains details on more than 214,000 offshore entities connected to people in more than 200 countries and territories. Company owners in billionaires, sports stars, drug smugglers and fraudsters."

"Reveal the offshore holdings 140 politicians and public officials around the world – including 12 current and former world leaders. Among them: the prime ministers of Iceland and Pakistan, the president of Ukraine, and the king of Saudi Arabia."

"Show how major banks have driven the creation of hard-to-trace companies in offshore havens. More than 500 banks their subsidiaries and their branches – including HSBC, UBS and Société Générale – created more than 15,000 offshore companies for their customers through Mossack Fonseca."

Check this site out here (https://panamapapers.icij.org/?utm_content=buffer7ca6b&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer)

The leaked records — which were reviewed by a team of more than 370 journalists from 76 countries — come from a little-known but powerful law firm based in Panama, Mossack Fonseca, that has branches in Hong Kong, Miami, Zurich and more than 35 other places around the globe.

The firm is one of the world’s top creators of shell companies, corporate structures that can be used to hide ownership of assets. The law firm’s leaked internal files contain information on 214,488 offshore entities connected to people in more than 200 countries and territories. ICIJ will release the full list of companies and people linked to them in early May."

Source (http://news.sky.com/story/1672075/offshore-accounts-of-world-leaders-revealed)
Source (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-35918844)

lift the veil
5th April 2016, 11:02
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/iceland-protests-panama-papers_us_5702a58ee4b0a06d58064555


Thousands Protest In Iceland After Prime Minister Refuses To Step Down
An online petition demanding Gunnlaugsson’s resignation has amassed more than 28,000 signatures.

http://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/scalefit_630_noupscale/5702cbb8150000ad000b3feb.jpeg

Hordes of protesters swarmed Iceland’s Parliament on Monday to demand that Prime Minister Sigmundur Gunnlaugsson and his government immediately step down and hold early general elections.

Documents leaked in the massive Panama Papers controversy reveal that in 2007, Gunnlaugsson and his wife purchased an offshore company that owned bonds in three Icelandic banks that collapsed during the nation’s financial crisis the following year.

Gunnlaugsson’s finance minister and interior minister also had stakes in offshore companies, according to the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, which leaked the documents on Sunday. Gunnlaugsson’s failure to disclose these assets since he joined Parliament in 2009 constitutes a violation of Iceland’s ethics rules, the ICIJ claims.

Icelanders’ political disgruntlement was already high amid other allegations of corruption before news of the Panama Papers broke. According to an opinion poll conducted earlier this year, nearly 70 percent did not support the current coalition government.

http://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/scalefit_630_noupscale/5702d7321e0000b3007062f6.jpeg

As of Monday afternoon, an online petition demanding Gunnlaugsson’s resignation had more than 28,000 signatures. Iceland’s population is approximately 330,000. Opposition parties have called for a no confidence vote to be held later in the week.

In a televised interview, the prime minister defended his innocence and rejected calls for his resignation, saying he will “let the voters judge the work of the government.” He also apologized for storming out of the room after he was confronted about the scandal during another recent interview.

It is not yet clear how many protesters gathered outside Iceland’s Parliament on Monday, but more than 10,000 people confirmed their attendance on a public Facebook event before the demonstrations. Many people used social media to voice their outrage and share images from the protests.

lift the veil
5th April 2016, 12:16
Here is an interesting piece by Gordon Duff over at Veteran's Today, regarding the Panama Papers

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/04/04/the-very-nasty-truth-about-the-panama-papers/

By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor on April 4, 2016

The Very Nasty Truth About the Panama Papers

The Panama Papers are a scam, real documents turned over to a Mossad run organization that now has dirt on even more people and more power to make a very nasty world an even darker and nastier place. This is what Wikileaks was and is, as exposed by VT and Zbigniew Brzezinski in December 2010.

The filth of the world will be protected and the innocent, should such things exist, can be targeted in the name of “investigative journalism” as teams seed phony material in and launder out damage to the politicians, names like Netanyahu and Bush, Cheney and Guiliani, Hollande and Blair, Kasich and Snyder, Gingrich and Romney, especially Romney.

The Panama Papers are a leak to a German newspaper of tens of thousands of corporate records from a law firm in Panama that ran much of the world’s money laundering. When a German newspaper received this dump over a year ago, they turned, unknowingly, to an organization actually run by intelligence agencies, in fact those with the most to risk from the leak itself, the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists.

The entire time this trove has been available it should have been in the hands of forensic accountants working for an agency or authority that none of us can name as such an agency simply doesn’t exist. There is no international authority without an agenda to serve drug cartels and money launderers.

For the last year, lists of owners of thousands of phony corporations used to launder money, have been reviewed by dozens of “journalists.” The result thus far has been to mention soccer officials, attack Russian president Putin and to smear the reputation of a well known worthless chiseler, Ian Cameron, father of slimeball David Cameron, long a blackmail victim tied to the News of the World “phone hacking scandal.

I am not going to begin to repeat what was found out about David Cameron, but “sick” is an understatement. From Craig Murray:


“But why focus on Russia? Russian wealth is only a tiny minority of the money hidden away with the aid of Mossack Fonseca. In fact, it soon becomes obvious that the selective reporting is going to stink.

The Suddeutsche Zeitung, which received the leak, gives a detailed explanation of the methodology the corporate media used to search the files. The main search they have done is for names associated with breaking UN sanctions regimes. The Guardian reports this too and helpfully lists those countries as Zimbabwe, North Korea, Russia and Syria.

The filtering of this Mossack Fonseca information by the corporate media follows a direct western governmental agenda. There is no mention at all of use of Mossack Fonseca by massive western corporations or western billionaires – the main customers. And the Guardian is quick to reassure that “much of the leaked material will remain private.”

What do you expect? The leak is being managed by the grandly but laughably named “International Consortium of Investigative Journalists”, which is funded and organised entirely by the USA’s Center for Public Integrity. Their funders include

Ford Foundation
Carnegie Endowment
Rockefeller Family Fund
W K Kellogg Foundation
Open Society Foundation (Soros)

among many others. Do not expect a genuine expose of western capitalism. The dirty secrets of western corporations will remain unpublished.

Expect hits at Russia, Iran and Syria and some tiny “balancing” western country like Iceland. A superannuated UK peer or two will be sacrificed – someone already with dementia.”

Like Britain’s pedophile scandals, this one will lead the same way, the very old or targeted folks who got “out of line” will be thrown to the wolves. The Mossad loves this dump, it gives them dirt on thousands of political leaders around the world they can now control even better.

As a real investigative journalist, with real sources in government, with first person sources watching drugs being smuggled out of Afghanistan, biological and chemical weapons out of Georgia or who has, with the team at VT, broken more stories in the past decade than all other publications combined, I know something about these things.

I also worked in banking as senior officer of an offshore banking operation and as a UN representative working with currency and “development” issues. I saw it all first hand and know the mechanics very well. I could teach this and probably should.

We know who the biggest players are in the Panama Papers. The real list doesn’t start with David Cameron’s dad or a FIFA (soccer) official. Bain Capital and Mitt Romney, followed by the Walton family of Walmart fame, the Canadian Bronfmans, Sheldon Adelson and, perhaps most newsworthy of all, several thousand corporations that tie the world’s drug cartels to American political leaders, including members of congress, state governors, city mayors, members of the US Supreme Court and a handful of former presidents. Craig Murray goes further in his analysis:


“The corporate media – the Guardian and BBC in the UK – have exclusive access to the database which you and I cannot see.

They are protecting themselves from even seeing western corporations’ sensitive information by only looking at those documents which are brought up by specific searches such as UN sanctions busters. Never forget the Guardian smashed its copies of the Snowden files on the instruction of MI6.

What if they did Mossack Fonseca database searches on the owners of all the corporate media and their companies, and all the editors and senior corporate media journalists? What if they did Mossack Fonseca searches on all the most senior people at the BBC? What if they did Mossack Fonseca searches on every donor to the Center for Public Integrity and their companies?

What if they did Mossack Fonseca searches on every listed company in the western stock exchanges, and on every western millionaire they could trace?

That would be much more interesting. I know Russia and China are corrupt, you don’t have to tell me that. What if you look at things that we might, here in the west, be able to rise up and do something about?

And what if you corporate lapdogs let the people see the actual data?”

Back in 2012, two months prior to the presidential election, a former senior FBI official, actively employed by the FBI, came to us. He had a story to tell. He said that Mitt Romney, working with a series of financial organizations in the US including banks owned by the Walton family, maintained accounts overseas for hundreds of American political leaders.

The story of these accounts, not whose name was on them, but confirming they existed, hit the newspapers only a few short days before, citing Romney as having thousands of secret bank accounts in the Cayman Islands.

We were told of how Romney and Carlos Salinas, former president of Mexico, met at Harvard Business School, and together built an empire out of the drug cartels that, through buying 5 US Supreme Court Justices who passed “Citizens United,” legalized drug cartel bribery, done through corporations set up by a law firm in Panama with offices around the world.

The FBI had audio and video tapes of Romney with Maria Perez, his mistress in Cuba, daughter of former KGB chief Yuri Andropov and his Cuban mistress. The tapes told of drug running and money laundering and more, so much more.

The source of the tapes was Mexican intelligence that had been after Salinas for years and had worked with our FBI source who had been the liaison between the US and Mexico on drug investigations through the 1990s. Of course we have all of these interviews recorded, some of them on YouTube.

The biggest single set of interlocking corporations that should have been exposed are tied to the nearly 3 trillion dollars missing from the US Department of Defense, money “disappeared” when the investigative records were mysteriously the victim of an aircraft accident on 9/11/2001 at the Pentagon, one of the most defended buildings on earth.

Not only were all the records destroyed but the 35 investigators were killed as well, having been asked to gather for a meeting with a White House official who never showed up. But that’s another story.

What we are saying is this, when former crimes were erased there was a reason. Bigger crimes were planned. Nearly every defense and intelligence contractor, from “Google Idea Groups” to the Blackwater network and hundreds more, were all tied to interlocking Panamanian corporations with ownership by members of congress, key Federal judges, and all of this run through a legal advocacy group known as the Federalist Society.

The Panama Papers could eventually expose certainly who is really behind 9/11. In 2014, we were given documents out of Russia that included a preliminary report on 9/11 by the US Department of Energy, outlining that event as “nuclear” and not as the result of terrorism, not as it is typically defined. The term “false flag terrorism” would apply, however.

Those of you who missed our VT nuclear 9-11 series you can start here.

The One
5th April 2016, 15:52
We knew global corporations were avoiding tax, now the Panama-papers leaks have shown us that world leaders are at it too.

But Panama is only the tip of the iceberg.

Britain itself is the head of the world's largest financial secrecy network, and is facilitating tax avoidance by refusing make its overseas territories expose the names of the individuals and companies that are hiding their wealth there.

Britain's refusal to shut its tax havens also makes possible tax avoidance by global corporations and global leaders.

This is a stitch up. Meaningful reform of the tax system in the interest of the public is being prevented due to the interests of the world's rich and powerful, who are making a killing.

Those literally being killed from this cosy deal are the world's poor.

x
Every year around $200bn of untaxed income is taken out of poor countries by the international corporations operating on their territory. That is around 50% more than the total amount they receive in aid from rich counties.

An estimated 1,000 children die each day across the developing world because illicit and untaxed income is spirited away from developed countries into tax havens.

Without the flow of untaxed money leaving the continent, Africa would on average be on course to hit the fourth Millennium Development Goal this year of reducing by two-thirds the under-five mortality rate. Now it will have to wait until 2029.

Britain should require that all of its crown dependencies and overseas territories such as the British Virgin and Cayman Islands attend the anti-corruption summit in May to pressure them to make public the names of the individuals and companies who are hiding untaxed or laundered income on their territories. Not doing so would mean the summit is a charade. The government should also launch an investigation into the affects of UK tax treaties on development in poor countries. Ireland and the Netherlands have done this, Britain should do the same.

For too long we have exploited poor countries for our own enrichment. Now we exploit poor countries for the enrichment of private multinationals. By fixing the global tax system we are also sending a message that Britain supports fair play. We are saying that we support the poor over the rich, the many over the few and public service over private greed.

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/diane-abbott/panama-is-just-the-tip-of-the-iceberg_b_9608832.html

bsbray
5th April 2016, 17:04
With any luck the Russians or some other antagonistic group will get a hold of the same documents and air the west's dirty laundry. Mitt Romney is one of those guys that you can tell has been up to no good just by looking at him. He gets those dark sunken eyes with that evil glow in them like Emperor Palpatine.

lift the veil
5th April 2016, 18:48
LOL. Loving the Emperor Palpatine reference, very appropriate.


With any luck the Russians or some other antagonistic group will get a hold of the same documents and air the west's dirty laundry. Mitt Romney is one of those guys that you can tell has been up to no good just by looking at him. He gets those dark sunken eyes with that evil glow in them like Emperor Palpatine.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/iceland-prime-minister-resignation-panama-papers_us_5703bd21e4b0a06d5806d3ee

IT BEGINS: FIRST GOV'T FALLS FROM 'PANAMA'

04/05/2016 09:29 am ET | Updated 1 hour ago

Iceland’s Prime Minister Resigns After Panama Papers Leaks

LONDON/REYKJAVIK, April 5 (Reuters) - Iceland’s Prime Minister Sigmundur David Gunnlaugsson is to step down after leaked documents from a Panamanian law firm showed his wife owned an offshore company with big claims on collapsed Icelandic banks, his party said.

Gunnlaugsson became the first prominent casualty from the revelations in the so-called Panama Papers, which have cast light on the financial arrangements of an array of politicians and public figures across the globe and the companies and financial institutions they use.

Earlier on Tuesday, Gunnlaugsson had asked Iceland’s president to dissolve parliament in the face of a looming no-confidence vote and mass street protests over the revelations.

The deputy leader of his Progressive Party, Sigurdur Ingi Johannsson, told reporters the party will suggest to its coalition partners in the Independence Party that he should become the new prime minister.

http://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/scalefit_630_noupscale/5703f022150000ad000b414e.jpeg
(Iceland’s Prime Minister Sigmundur David Gunnlaugsson resigned Tuesday after a massive leak of documents revealed his wife owned an offshore company with big claims on collapsed Icelandic banks.)


With the fallout from the leaks reverberating across the globe, British Prime Minister David Cameron came under fire from opponents who accused him of allowing a rich elite to dodge their taxes.

And in China, the Beijing government dismissed as “groundless” reports that the families of President Xi Jinping and other current and former Chinese leaders were linked to offshore accounts.

Beijing also moved to limit local access to coverage of the matter. State media denounced Western reporting on it as biased against non-Western leaders.

The more than 11.5 million documents were leaked from the Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca. Among those named in them are friends of Russian President Vladimir Putin, relatives of the leaders of China, Britain, Iceland and Pakistan, and the president of Ukraine.

The papers have caused public outrage over how the world’s rich and powerful are able to stash their cash and avoid taxes while many people suffer austerity and hardship.

Thousands gathered outside the Icelandic parliament in Reykjavik on Monday to protest about what the opposition said was Gunnlaugsson’s failure to disclose a conflict of interest over his wife’s offshore company, which has big claims on Iceland’s collapsed banks.

Icelandic government bonds saw their biggest sell-off in five months due to the uncertainty, with yields on 10-year bonds jumping 15.6 basis points to 5.891 percent.

http://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/scalefit_630_noupscale/5703efa51e0000b300706436.jpeg
(Hordes of protesters gathered in front of Iceland’s Parliament on Monday to demand his immediate resignation.)


“ABUSE MUST STOP”

In Britain, the leader of the opposition Labour Party demanded that the government tackle tax havens, saying it was time Cameron stopped allowing “the super-rich elite” to dodge taxes.

“There cannot be one set of tax rules for the wealthy elite and another for the rest of us,” Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said. “The unfairness and abuse must stop.”

He said Britain had a huge responsibility since many tax havens, such as the British Virgin Islands and Cayman Islands, are British overseas territories, while others such as Jersey or the Isle of Man are British crown dependencies.

According to media that have seen Mossack Fonseca’s files, more than half of the 200,000 companies set up by the firm were registered in the British Virgin Islands, where details of ownership do not have to be filed with the authorities.

Cameron has cast himself as a champion in the fight against tax evasion in British-linked territories. But he was put on the spot by the leaks, which named his late father and members of the ruling Conservative Party among the list of clients who used Mossack Fonseca’s services.

Cameron said he did not own any shares or have offshore funds.

“I have a salary as prime minister, and I have some savings, which I get some interest from, and I have a house,” he said. “I have no shares, no offshore trusts, no offshore funds, nothing like that.”

http://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/scalefit_630_noupscale/5703f08b2e00002d009507be.jpeg
(British Prime Minister David Cameron also came under fire from opponents who accused him of allowing a rich elite to dodge their taxes.)

Other leading figures and financial institutions responded to the leak with denials of any wrongdoing as prosecutors and regulators began a review of the investigation by the U.S.-based International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) and other media organizations.

Britain, France, Australia, New Zealand, Austria, Sweden and the Netherlands are among nations that have started inquiries.

French Finance Minister Michel Sapin said Paris would put Panama back on its blacklist of uncooperative tax jurisdictions. The Central American nation is one of the most secretive of the world’s offshore havens and has refused to sign up to a global transparency initiative.

Mossack Fonseca has set up more than 240,000 offshore companies for clients around the globe and denies any wrongdoing. It says it is the victim of a campaign against privacy and that media reports misrepresent the nature of its business.

Mossack Fonseca’s Hong Kong office said on Tuesday the firm had never been charged with or formally investigated for criminal wrongdoing in its nearly 40 years of operation.

“We do not advise clients on how to operate their businesses. We don’t link ourselves in any way to companies we help incorporate,” the firm said in a statement.

“Excluding the professional fees we earn, we don’t take possession of clients’ money, or otherwise have anything to do with any of the direct financial aspects related to operating these businesses.”


“GROUNDLESS ACCUSATION”

The reports also pointed to offshore companies linked to the families of Chinese President Xi and other powerful figures.

http://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/scalefit_630_noupscale/5703f1b51500002a000b4151.jpeg
(Members of Chinese President Xi’s family were also named in the leaked documents for having links to offshore companies.)

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei, when asked if the government would investigate tax affairs of those mentioned in the documents, told reporters the ministry would not comment on “these groundless accusations.”

The Hong Kong government said its tax department would take “necessary actions” based on any information it received.

Credit Suisse and HSBC, two of the world’s largest wealth managers, dismissed suggestions they were actively using offshore structures to help clients evade tax.

Both were among the banks that helped set up complex structures that make it hard for tax collectors and investigators to track the flow of money, according to ICIJ.

Credit Suisse CEO Tidjane Thiam, who is aggressively targeting Asia’s wealthiest for growth, said his bank was only after lawful assets.

“We do not condone structures for tax avoidance,” he told a media briefing.

HSBC said the documents pre-dated a thorough reform of its business model. Both banks have in recent years paid big fines to U.S. authorities over their wealth management or banking operations.

The famous personalities drawn into the affair also included soccer star Lionel Messi. Spanish tax authorities said they are investigating allegations of tax irregularities involving Barcelona’s Argentinian striker after the release of the documents.

Messi’s family released a statement denying wrongdoing and saying it “never used the company” involved in the matter. (Reporting by Reuters bureaux, Writing by Angus MacSwan; Editing by Kevin Liffey and Anna Willard)

The One
5th April 2016, 19:42
So many from Panama wow.Now just imagine all them mentioned in the papers actually got on or maybe they all do and they have played a game over humanity from whenever we can remember.

Check this out HMRC actually rents its headquarters from a company registered in a tax haven http://indy100.independent.co.uk/article/hmrc-actually-rents-its-headquarters-from-a-company-registered-in-a-tax-haven--bJ2PgGt9eZ

Aianawa
5th April 2016, 22:18
Excellent that this has come out and yes after reading Veterans Today article yesterday, feel there has been an organised ( as usual ) long term playing out of targeting and solution based conniving, But imo it will work in the favour of people waking up to THE GAME the illusion the we were stupid the of course dah, to then spit tacks and demands to then know thyselfs and Then Intuition killed the cabal.

Joanna
6th April 2016, 09:54
More than 800 super rich individuals and corporations are now being investigated by the ATO (Australian Taxation Office) in the wake of this leak, with an estimated $540 billion+ having been secreted away tax-free.

Aianawa
6th April 2016, 10:21
When we see USA corporations plus especially vanguard in the news, Then I will be excited.

lift the veil
6th April 2016, 11:16
https://twitter.com/mathewi/status/716771686482202625


Editor of Süddeutsche Zeitung responded to the lack of U.S. individuals in the documents, saying "Just wait for what is coming next"

The above quote is from Matthew Ingram, who is a senior writer for Fortune magazine.

Aianawa
6th April 2016, 12:26
Today's article from DW on divinecosmos gave good hints to what this is all about, sorry unable to put link here ATM.

BabaRa
6th April 2016, 18:20
Another Voice:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHY3ncyrNUA

Corbett's Take:


https://www.corbettreport.com/

Aragorn
7th April 2016, 07:26
Another Voice:




Corbett's Take:

[video]https://www.corbettreport.com/


Thanks for that video, BabaRa. I was already pondering how and why this was leaked right now, and who would have been behind it.

It's an internal war, or perhaps an internal "ethnic cleansing" within the Cabal, that's all. Behind the scenes, every single one of these leaks of the past decade or so has always been the work of a pot exposing a kettle, not a victory of humanity over the Cabal, as many would like to think — even though it wouldn't surprise me one bit if Fulford, Duff and their ilk would be claiming credit for "exposing this scandal".

The Cabal are not "the powers that were", they are "the powers that be". They are still firmly in control, and sacrificing their own is only part and parcel of their way of life. Betrayal is the greatest virtue in their eyes. Does anybody really believe that they are so inefficient in their machinations that it would take a few single leaks here and there to topple and oust them? Really? After they've already been firmly seated in their positions of power for hundreds if not thousands of years?

For that matter, does anybody also still really believe that Bradley/Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden just happened to come along? Of course they didn't. They were chosen. They were being manipulated — with or without their knowledge. Not only were they deliberately given access to certain information, but they were also being coaxed to leak that information, and they were given a clear chance to do so without getting caught before the information made it into the public attention.

Manning was arrested after Wikileaks had already started publishing the Cablegate documents, and Snowden knew that he was going to have a price put on his head the minute he approached Greenwald, just as he knew exactly whom to run to for protection. And Julian Assange? Well, he's definitely got an agenda. He's working for someone — you can all count on that.

RealityCreation
7th April 2016, 08:12
Here's the link to David's article & his perspective on the Panama papers & updates re his latest book Aianawa.

http://divinecosmos.com/start-here/davids-blog/1198-panama-ascension

Aianawa
7th April 2016, 11:57
Cheers Reality creation, Aragorn IMO, ones mind is theirs only once known, then not needed, one may still have filters lol but because one is now creating, one soon knows their filters, IMO tptW Were are the same as your TPTb be, who has who s mind ?.

Aragorn
7th April 2016, 13:58
Cheers Reality creation, Aragorn IMO, ones mind is theirs only once known, then not needed, one may still have filters lol but because one is now creating, one soon knows their filters, IMO tptW Were are the same as your TPTb be, who has who s mind ?.

Well, do you see any evidence that their power is on the decline? Because from where I'm sitting, they're still organizing terrorism on a large scale, they're still controlling politics (and with it, the freedom of the population), they're still controlling the economy, and they're still spying on us and keeping any and all evidence of the usability of free energy devices and of exotic transportation technologies — let's just call it that — out of the public awareness, tying us all into the corporate energy suppliers and locking us in traffic jams.

I am only being realistic, Aianawa. Dreaming of a bright and better future is one thing, and I have dreams too, but out there, outside my door, there's still that very same cold, hard reality.

BabaRa
7th April 2016, 15:17
[QUOTE=Aragorn;841948548]Thanks for that video, BabaRa. I was already pondering how and why this was leaked right now, and who would have been behind it.

It's an internal war, or perhaps an internal "ethnic cleansing" within the Cabal, that's all. Behind the scenes, every single one of these leaks of the past decade or so has always been the work of a pot exposing a kettle, not a victory of humanity over the Cabal, as many would like to think — even though it wouldn't surprise me one bit if Fulford, Duff and their ilk would be claiming credit for "exposing this scandal".

I agree with your analysis of "it's the pot exposing the kettle" . . . but in the outing of one another, a few more sleeping souls begin to stir . . and the Fulfords and Duffs keep stirring the pot, so they serve the purpose at some level.

Never as fast or as deep as we would like to see things happen, but it is slowly churning.

BabaRa
7th April 2016, 15:26
Well, do you see any evidence that their power is on the decline? Because from where I'm sitting, they're still organizing terrorism on a large scale, they're still controlling politics (and with it, the freedom of the population), they're still controlling the economy, and they're still spying on us and keeping any and all evidence of the usability of free energy devices and of exotic transportation technologies — let's just call it that — out of the public awareness, tying us all into the corporate energy suppliers and locking us in traffic jams.

I am only being realistic, Aianawa. Dreaming of a bright and better future is one thing, and I have dreams too, but out there, outside my door, there's still that very same cold, hard reality.


I agree, however, here in the USA I am seeing tiny cracks in the dam. The big question is: Will the American citizens take to the streets and ask for wage equality and political reform, or will they be duped as often in the past by a few hollow promises and the HOPE of a better tomorrow.

IMO humanity, through religion, has been trained (brainwashed) to accept the 'cross we have to bear' here on earth, but PROMISED we will be awarded in heaven for bearing said cross. And those of us who aren't religious have been trained by statements like: you can't fight city hall. Anotherwords, they have the power, just accept it.

lcam88
8th April 2016, 13:01
We are seeing internal fighting between factions according to Mr Farrell. Putin did something interesting that Farrell touches on.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_gGF_IOjyIw

lift the veil
8th April 2016, 16:11
I hope Putin releases the Kraken! Rip the scab off.

bsbray
8th April 2016, 20:18
“ABUSE MUST STOP”

In Britain, the leader of the opposition Labour Party demanded that the government tackle tax havens, saying it was time Cameron stopped allowing “the super-rich elite” to dodge taxes.

[...]

Cameron has cast himself as a champion in the fight against tax evasion in British-linked territories. But he was put on the spot by the leaks, which named his late father and members of the ruling Conservative Party among the list of clients who used Mossack Fonseca’s services.

Cameron said he did not own any shares or have offshore funds.

“I have a salary as prime minister, and I have some savings, which I get some interest from, and I have a house,” he said. “I have no shares, no offshore trusts, no offshore funds, nothing like that.”


Sucks for Cameron. That didn't last long:


The British Prime Minister admitted having owned shares in an offshore trust named in the historic leak

Just days after the Panama Papers toppled Iceland’s prime minister, the British premier now faces career-threatening accusations of financial impropriety.

The leak of 11.5 million documents from Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca has already implicated a number of world leaders in a web of shady offshore accounting.

Among them is British Prime Minister David Cameron, whose late father’s offshore fund — Blairmore Holdings — was exposed by the leak. Cameron said on Thursday that he had owned shares in the trust, after several days of dodging questions about what interests he had in it.

http://time.com/4286316/panama-papers-david-cameron/


Since then calls for Cameron to resign have apparently been the biggest trending thing on Twitter.

bsbray
8th April 2016, 20:55
Well, do you see any evidence that their power is on the decline? Because from where I'm sitting, they're still organizing terrorism on a large scale

The largest scale where the terrorism had been happening was probably in Syria and Ukraine and both of those situations have been relatively brought under control, in that the CIA mercenaries are really being stomped out through cooperation between Russia and the Pentagon.

Jeb Bush was forced out of the presidential race in the US, which I think is really something to celebrate. The Bush faction came to power through the CIA at the time Kennedy was assassinated and now I'm convinced that a counter-coup is running them back out of power. Iceland's just forced a PM to resign, Cameron is getting the same message from Brits now, Mitt Romney will hopefully come under fire for his role as head of Bain Capital, and there has been a lot of similar stuff going on with other officials. I don't think this is just some mundane cleaning house, whatever that is really supposed to mean, because if there was really one power group that was running everything without resistance or opposition then these kinds of exercises should be totally unnecessary. They really are getting a fight over things.

The worldwide energy market and the oil market in particularly is also being shook up, with oil companies declaring bankruptcy as a result of the low prices while alternative forms of energy and the electric car market are expanding simultaneously. The oil industry has maintained its dominance over the decades by suppressing alternative technologies, and they are no longer having much success doing this. The collapse of the oil cartels alone, enough to allow for the rise of alternative energies, has the potential to transform the look of the entire world in a positive way just by itself.

Another big, positive development from the past month or so has been some big food companies in the US like General Mills finally caving to public demands to label their GMO products. Monsanto has already been kicked out of a number of countries, and awareness over that issue is growing as well.

As far as MSM goes, polls here last year indicated that the public trusts the major media even less than they trust politicians, at somewhere around 30% of the peoples' trust, and more and more people are getting information online, which is still a remarkably free medium for the time being, as long as we are willing to fight to keep it that way.

I don't think this has ever been an overnight process when regimes change (takes years of building change), but I think it's obvious that something big is changing from the typical kind of control structure we've seen in the west for a long time, and the changes actually look pretty promising.

BabaRa
8th April 2016, 21:49
We are seeing internal fighting between factions according to Mr Farrell. Putin did something interesting that Farrell touches on.



I agree with Farrell as to the infighting among the US elite. I also suspect that MSM focused on Putin and Russia to pull our attention in that direction (we seem to love to hate the Russians), so as not to focus on the US's involvement. Bad mistake. They never seem to get that you can't poke the Bear. No matter what you think about Putin, one has to admit he's a great chess player.

Putin's response: He is going to release classified documents that go back to 1930, which he claims will be an embarrassment to US elites. . . . I'm sure he's right, BUT will the documents come out in MSM? . . . I'm sure they will come out in alternative sites - and hopefully will trickle to those still in denial. Pandora's Box may be opened in a way that they can't close it up again.

lcam88
9th April 2016, 00:46
Over at zerohedge there is an interesting article that puts Putin chess into a new perspective (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-04-08/was-panama-papers-leak-russian-intelligence-operation).


If this was the work of the CIA, it was an extremely sloppy and obvious hit job. On the other hand, if this was the work of Putin for the purposes of blackmail, it’s one of the most ingenious chess moves I’ve ever seen played on the global stage. If this theory is correct, it’s the worse case scenario for American citizens. So if Putin is behind this, and does have the goods on the U.S. elite, not only do we not get rid of the these corrupt oligarchs, we now have to live with them in an even more compromised state than they were before.

That is an interesting spin to work from.

It's important to remember that the good guy is neither the Russians [or the Americans]. Rather was probably the first victim along with the truth.

BabaRa
9th April 2016, 19:07
Over at zerohedge there is an interesting article that puts Putin chess into a new perspective (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-04-08/was-panama-papers-leak-russian-intelligence-operation).



That is an interesting spin to work from.

It's important to remember that the good guy is neither the Russians [or the Americans]. Rather was probably the first victim along with the truth.

The Zero Hedge article was a response by the Brookings Institute, which IMO was a spin to hopefully cover all the coverage by the alternative medium about this being a psyops hack by either CIA or NSA or the likes. If Putin wanted to leak classified docs from the 30's, which in his opinion would be detrimental to many Western Families, he wouldn't have had to go to such a round about scheme.

Here are some other voices on the subject:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7os8Lwzfbl8

lcam88
9th April 2016, 23:01
Just thinking here:

Why would establishment release papers that would harm Hillary's campaign further? If you can choose when and where the fallout happens, why not wait til after the elections?

Whoever released the papers found it convenient to use as election fodder. They may solve the Hillary Clinton future problem that way. => Putin, maybe Pentagon?

How does it effect the Syria fallout? If pentagon backed moderate rebel forces now have the upper hand over the CIA backed radial IS forces, Does this move have an effect on that balance of power? It depends on who is the larger beneficiary of the "offshore assets", and who is more vulnerable to public backlash. But really, the big winner is the one that has ended its operations and tosses another issue for both of these to sort out. => Putin, certainly Pentagon more than CIA.

We have Rothchild trusts and foundations getting inflated within the US (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-04-05/rotschild-admits-america-biggest-tax-haven-world-obama-slams-tax-evasion), they have upped the ante and taken care of their competition it seems.

It seems someone is up to blaming the Chinese for a central bank hack job (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-03-07/chinese-hackers-break-ny-fed-steal-100-million-bangladesh-central-bank) some time ago, where did that money go to? I was under the impression that it was NSA "advisors" that where being hired as consultants by banks, and that maybe the bangladesh central bank wasn't playing ball...

With all the Afghan heroin trade and cocaine trait in South America performing as per design, I don't think CIA really needs to open a hole in their own boat. Weapons business is big business and it's nice to have the offshores to deal weapons with neutral countries, Pentagon also might be enjoying their sweet setup. If it is not Putin, then clearly I think CIA is more hurt than pentagon. But still that question of why before the elections? :/

Maybe Hillary is more cosy with CIA and that is how it has to be. Russia is not targeted because they have important parts to play in the next Chapter. But they keep the big fish happy with those foundations securely setup in the US.

BabaRa
10th April 2016, 07:13
Just thinking here:

Why would establishment release papers that would harm Hillary's campaign further? If you can choose when and where the fallout happens, why not wait til after the elections?

.


I have heard elsewhere that the release of this info would hurt Hillary. . . but in other places it's been reported that the names of no high level US politicians or citizens have been released.
If you know of something specific that was released as to Hillary, please share. Thanks

Also, you ask: "why would establishment release papers that would harm Hillary."
Many, including myself don't believe the USA is controlled by one faction. There is infighting within these groups and also fighting for control between them. Not ALL favor Hillary.

lcam88
10th April 2016, 13:18
Sen Sanders used the papers to target Hillary by saying the effects of: I voted against the free trade agreement in 1981, I could foresee what was going to happen. Panama does not produce anything substantial, not cars not computers... What do they have to offer? Hillary supports the free trade agreement with Panama.

That all to say that panama trade is "corporate favors" of some kind that Hillary and her associates use to avoid paying their fair share of taxes.

That hurts Hillary even if her name is not specifically mentioned.

I too think there are at least two large factions in the USA; think my question was incorrectly written. Establishment being the word incorrectly used.

JRS
10th April 2016, 15:37
Ha Hah! From DW: "Panama toilet papers" How fitting!

bsbray
10th April 2016, 17:32
Just thinking here:

Why would establishment release papers that would harm Hillary's campaign further? If you can choose when and where the fallout happens, why not wait til after the elections?

Maybe I missed what they imply as far as Hillary goes but I definitely agree with BabaRa that there is more than one faction at work in the US and they are not all playing the same game anymore. I think a lot of the underhanded stuff is being cut off, and the public exposure is only a kind of insurance that the cut-off will stick, because know everybody knows about these offshore accounts and there will be more responsibility expected from the public to monitor them The drug smuggling out of South America is being hit too from I've been reading (el Chapo being a part of that) and even ISIS's funding from oil fields has been wrecked by Putin. ISIS = CIA mercenaries. John McCain about peed himself when Putin rolled into Syria with the big guns and started blowing up his terrorist friends.

Edit..

I saw your post now lcamm so I see what you mean about Bernie using it as political ammo. I think it's going to take more of a bombshell than that to derail Hillary's campaign but maybe I'm wrong. I do think something big is going to happen before this election cycle is over. I don't know whether it'll be in the form of a false flag, economic collapse or what, but "the cabal" isn't just going to passively allow the US presidency to slip back out of their control. They will raise hell in a big way before that happens, if they haven't been sufficiently restrained before then.

lcam88
10th April 2016, 18:27
I don't know whether it'll be in the form of a false flag, economic collapse or what, but "the cabal" isn't just going to passively allow the US presidency to slip back out of their control...

I think Trump is controllable enough, he is smart but dangling the carrot works well enough with him as there are no idealistic obstacles to "making business deals". Bernie is a completely different individual.

FBI incitement over emails is on the menu; how can that be timed so that a presidential pardon can be made without causing electoral backlash?

The democrats have already resorted to voter manipulation tactics in AZ at least. If the super-delegates refuse to back the popular vote when Bernie wins the delegates required we'll have a nice big sign out on the White House lawn saying "No Democracy Here".

If there is a public backlash of some kind, and I presume there will be, the police are well prepared to handle that. <sigh/>

It will be an interesting thing to watch.

False flags are good to get the ball moving in a new direction. Economic collapse too, but perhaps it is less effective now that it has been used so recently.

Here is what I think may happen if Bernie does win the nomination. He will be required to pick up a running-mate that is supported by the party. An agreement will be in place where he doesn't interfere with what his vise is doing and that will be all she wrote. A vise-presidential signature on a weapons contract is as good as a presidential signature. And because the vise-president is not so much in the public eye that will be a candy-lane of mainstream meyham and madness. The cabal only has to prevent the symbolic acts the president may engage in from being too much more than symbolic, something congress has a part to play in.

BabaRa
11th April 2016, 18:40
big[/b] is going to happen before this election cycle is over. I don't know whether it'll be in the form of a false flag, economic collapse or what, but "the cabal" isn't just going to passively allow the US presidency to slip back out of their control. They will raise hell in a big way before that happens, if they haven't been sufficiently restrained before then.


As to the cabal letting the control slip out of their hands: Does whoever is president have that much control? Mostly the presidency is window dressing. Granted some of the puppets are more difficult to control, but tptb find ways; as Kennedy and Carter and perhaps Obama found out.

I also have the sense that something big is on the horizon - or maybe it will be a series of smaller events that finally crack the dam open.

I see here in the US that Eric Prince (founder of Blackwater) is being investigated. https://www.corbettreport.com/interview-1154-michael-krieger-on-erik-princes-insane-post-blackwater-career/

Also the Dennis Hastert case has come back into the news. MSN has tried to bury this story on several occasions, but it keeps cropping up. This case goes very deep into both the Republican and Democrat's in office. Corbett did a very good story on it. This dog and pony show we call the presidential campaign is to keep us focused away from all these stories.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFZRQcSMeeM

bsbray
11th April 2016, 19:53
As to the cabal letting the control slip out of their hands: Does whoever is president have that much control?

I think they can, if they can't be controlled by certain interests. I really think that's why Kennedy was killed, and Lincoln, and probably the other two we've had assassinated. I'm not sure what to make of Carter and I think Obama was as much of a puppet as any of them from the start. But Kennedy and Lincoln were both using their constitutional powers to do things that rubbed financial interests the wrong way. The Constitution, combined with the traditional powers that the presidency has assumed over time, like executive orders, really give some pretty sweeping powers.


I hadn't even heard of the Hastert case until your post just now. Thanks for the info BabaRa.

lcam88
12th April 2016, 00:01
I think Obama has put quite a bit of effort in defying "them".

lcam88
12th April 2016, 14:06
Panama Papers: Spy agencies widely used Mossack Fonseca to hide activities (https://www.rt.com/news/339310-spy-agencies-panama-papers/)

The dividing line between the factions has a clear point of reference to me.

If you consider Edward Snowden as another piece of the factional puzzle... Wikileaks found Julian Assange as well.

Zero-hedge said something interesting in the previous article I shared here: that once a name has appeared on the list, the exposure already happened and there is no more "threat" remaining. The individuals being threatened by the exposure are indeed the ones that are not on the list.

I see Hillary somewhat targeted in that sense, especially because of the timing of it all.

Chester
12th April 2016, 15:10
Another Voice:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHY3ncyrNUA

Corbett's Take:


https://www.corbettreport.com/

This is the first thing I thought

Chester
12th April 2016, 15:17
For that matter, does anybody also still really believe that Bradley/Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden just happened to come along? Of course they didn't. They were chosen. They were being manipulated — with or without their knowledge.

Exactly and...


Here's the link to David's article & his perspective on the Panama papers & updates re his latest book Aianawa.

http://divinecosmos.com/start-here/davids-blog/1198-panama-ascension

Wilcock is just another one that has been chosen (as Corey Goode) and who is being manipulated.

Aragorn
12th April 2016, 15:58
For that matter, does anybody also still really believe that Bradley/Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden just happened to come along? Of course they didn't. They were chosen. They were being manipulated — with or without their knowledge.

Exactly and...


Here's the link to David's article & his perspective on the Panama papers & updates re his latest book Aianawa.

http://divinecosmos.com/start-here/davids-blog/1198-panama-ascension


Wilcock is just another one that has been chosen (as Corey Goode) and who is being manipulated.




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGXvj2BjZLA

Chester
12th April 2016, 16:06
Not my favorite sin... (vanity) but your point is a good one, Aragorn.

I would have to cite the one sin that didn't make it onto the popular list -

deception... especially the conscious and willful deception of others.

I cannot think of a worse "sin."

Aragorn
12th April 2016, 16:27
Not my favorite sin... (vanity) but your point is a good one, Aragorn.

Well, it certainly applies to David W., Kerry C. and Bill R. And they're all good buddies with a guy called Jack B. — except for Corey G., who doesn't like Jack B. much. ;)


I would have to cite the one sin that didn't make it onto the popular list -

deception... especially the conscious and willful deception of others.

I cannot think of a worse "sin."

Then I would have had to embed the whole movie, Sam. :p :ttr:

lift the veil
20th April 2016, 19:25
Benjamin Fulford referenced the following in his recent post http://sitsshow.blogspot.com/2016/04/Benjamin-Fulford-April-18th-2016-Red-and-Green-Asian-secret-societies-under-new-leadership-promise-to-make-the-earth-tremble.html


This may be why the Khazarian mafia oligarchs have suddenly launched campaigns in the US and Europe to close offshore tax havens and force or lure the world’s $31 trillion in offshore money into Europe or the US where they can confiscate it and stave off bankruptcy. CIA sources say the Rothschilds have already managed to lure “trillions” of dollars into Reno, Nevada with this cockroach motel scam. You can be sure it is not their own offshore money they plan to repatriate.