Chester
4th November 2015, 13:48
This is just someone like you or me who has interest in what comes forth these days from Witnesses & Whistleblowers and "others" (those who prefer a different label).
He can be irritating. So can Witnesses & Whistleblowers and "Others." So can I. If you can get over that, he sometimes makes some good points. He also sometimes makes false assumptions as if they were true to make some good points. Regardless, he may be interesting to some and so here is one "analysis" I found interesting.
pDxE4YHAkg0
at around the 46:00 minute mark, Chanter points out how these people (and their groupies) become the "gatekeepers" - and this has been precisely my experience - especially when they share their woo-woo not in a way that allows the listener to decide for themselves if they want to buy-in but in imposing ways. Imposing ways do not have to be direct and in fact sometimes are more imposing than direct as "mind game" forms of implantation are used.
Sadly, I know this all too well as I have had several first hand experiences.
He can be irritating. So can Witnesses & Whistleblowers and "Others." So can I. If you can get over that, he sometimes makes some good points. He also sometimes makes false assumptions as if they were true to make some good points. Regardless, he may be interesting to some and so here is one "analysis" I found interesting.
pDxE4YHAkg0
at around the 46:00 minute mark, Chanter points out how these people (and their groupies) become the "gatekeepers" - and this has been precisely my experience - especially when they share their woo-woo not in a way that allows the listener to decide for themselves if they want to buy-in but in imposing ways. Imposing ways do not have to be direct and in fact sometimes are more imposing than direct as "mind game" forms of implantation are used.
Sadly, I know this all too well as I have had several first hand experiences.