PDA

View Full Version : 6 Degrees of Separation: Order from Chaos



Shadowself
17th June 2015, 14:03
Good morning!

I've started this thread as one; I promised to expand on something I worked on that was intentionally suppressed/Erased. Two because I believe it has significance into our present condition and stems back as far as the Great Pyramid.

So why is it in the Archeology section? Well that will become obvious soon enough.

Think of this OP post as a place holder as I don't have time today to expand on it until most likely this weekend. But I believe you may be surprised (and pleasantly so) the direction this thread will lead.

So I will leave you with this video as a basic clue and you're more than welcome until this weekend to discuss:

"Order from Chaos"....What it means to you and why it might be so important to whomever. My take and discovery might surprise you very much.

Perception says ( the first 57 seconds of this video):



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjwiachXkjc

lcam88
17th June 2015, 17:41
Dear Shadowself:

I'd like to submit a question to the thread, for the purpose of examining the theme. But in no way do I mean to diminish your efforts or work.

I have to ask: Why presume order from chaos in the universe, rather than chaos from order?

<signed/>

Aragorn
18th June 2015, 08:38
Dear Shadowself:

I'd like to submit a question to the thread, for the purpose of examining the theme. But in no way do I mean to diminish your efforts or work.

I have to ask: Why presume order from chaos in the universe, rather than chaos from order?

<signed/>

It is my personal opinion and experience that although the universe itself tends to lean toward an increase in entropy, it also constantly creates organized and ordered structures -- e.g. galaxies, clusters of galaxies, stars, planets, moons, even simple molecules and atoms, and of course life itself. Entropy can only increase because of the perceived arrow of time, and it is this same mechanism by which organized and ordered structures grow, so I believe that the perceived arrow of time is only there to accentuate the contrast between the organized structures and the tendency toward entropy. Metaphorically speaking, it is the manifestation within the laws of physics of the perpetual fight between the light and the darkness.

You will also find these concepts within the laws of physics:


A Bose-Einstein condensate is a chaotic form of matter because the individual constituents of a compound molecule can no longer be detected and isolated. Bose-Einstein condensates are commonly only found at extremely low temperatures, only just above absolute zero -- i.e. near 0 Kelvin, or otherwise put: -273.15° Centigrade, which equals -459.67° Fahrenheit.
Quantum physics also teaches us of the quantum super state as total entropy -- i.e. chaos -- and of the collapse of the wave-function as the creation of order out of that chaos.
In the Big Bang model of the universe, we also see the creation of a (weak) form of order from what was ultimately a chaotic situation where nothing would have had meaning. It was the ultimate Bose-Einstein condensate (or quantum super state).
Keeping that last bullet point here-above in mind, we can say that order tends to grow out of chaos, but that the universe itself is inclined to lean toward an increase in entropy, and thus an increase in chaos again. The quantum physics concept regarding the collapse of the wave-function also seems to confirm that order is created out of chaos.

Furthermore, consciousness in its purest form will always try to identify what it perceives -- at least, to the extent of the knowledge by which it can identify anything at all. And thus, once again, to me -- as I've said so many times before -- this reflects the purpose of Creation, which is that the Creator/Creation duality serves so as to allow Source to make sense of the information it is comprised of, and thus, of itself.

Myst
18th June 2015, 13:36
.

lcam88
18th June 2015, 13:46
Mr Aragorn:

I see what you are saying, to the effects of: in a crystal we can see order amongst the lattices and the molecular structure. We can disrupt that order causing more chaos by smashing the crystal; such a phenomena would hardly be notable of the scientific inquiry as finding the crystal remade from its shards would certainly warrant.

And of the above theories you share fall into the latter category. Order of a whole being formed out of a chaotic precursor type medium. My inclination is that both aspects of reorganization to and from ends of the "Order <=> Chaos" continuum are equally interesting for the reason I go into briefly below.


...this reflects the purpose of Creation, which is that the Creator/Creation duality serves so as to allow Source to make sense of the information it is comprised of, and thus, of itself.

I think I'm dwelling, once again, on a paradigm that stems from the above quote.

I think my posed question is somewhat better understood in a context where we ignore the factor of perceived time. Ignore the effect time has on reordering the chaotic or disruption of the orderly, and contemplate what_is in a single moment at the various levels or plains of existence/perception from ours and through the "astral" and perhaps beyond to where there, I presume, there is always perfect order.

Pardon my off-topic Shadowself, Aragorn knows me all too well.

lcam88
18th June 2015, 13:51
This is what I was looking for.


The most abstract duality, as taught by Ra, is the Freedom/Love duality. Freedom and Love are the first two distortions of the One. If there is an order to such things, Freedom precedes Love, in the sense that the initial differentiation of the One was a bestowal of Freedom. But immediately Love appeared as the inherent connectedness of the differentiated units; Love is the universal unifying force, the antidote to the illusion of separation: a kind of spiritual gravity. And yet the greatest act of Love is the bestowal of Freedom and the greatest use of Freedom is to choose Love

Thanks.

Shadowself
18th June 2015, 15:20
Keep going guys!

No wrong answers here. All taken into consideration. I'll be reading here for a few days. Then over the weekend I'll continue on.

Thanks for the great reply so far!

Consider this: Six degrees of separation...and Chaos. What's the connection?

Remember...no wrong answers here.

I'll leave this to ponder:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rzxAyY7D7k

Enjoy!

Rebel&Rocket
18th June 2015, 17:04
Love, love, love that play/movie. It's such a profound statement about who and what we are socially. What I took from it, many years ago when I first saw it, was that the author was illustrating that the six degrees of separation are an illusion. We separate ourselves - money, education, social status, etc. Paul breaks down the walls of separation by pretending to be something he's not. In the end, he is discovered and those he has blurred the lines of separation for are angry. If order is oneness, and chaos is the separation....Chaos is an illusion. It is self-imposed. Separation is actually celebrated, coveted.

Order, chaos, order, chaos.... Like a phoenix constantly burning down and rising from its ashes. There are interesting theories on evolution, that the increasing disorder of entropy can generate the increasing complexity implied by evolution. Order from chaos. I found this in a paper written by Henry Morris, PhD., discussing different theories that chaos can produce evolutionary advance:

The strange idea is currently being widely promoted that, in the assumed four-billion-year history of life on the earth, evolution has proceeded by means of long periods of stasis, punctuated by brief periods of massive extinctions. Then rapid evolutionary emergence of organisms of higher complexity came out of the chaotic milieu causing the extinction.

It's the very same as the theory of Infinite Creator/Ultimate Oneness breaking itself down to reunify.

bsbray
18th June 2015, 19:27
It is my personal opinion and experience that although the universe itself tends to lean toward an increase in entropy, it also constantly creates organized and ordered structures -- e.g. galaxies, clusters of galaxies, stars, planets, moons, even simple molecules and atoms, and of course life itself.

That was my conclusion as well. According to the "law" of entropy (2nd law of thermodynamics), everything should always be losing energy, breaking down into simpler parts, and generally falling apart and returning to an "equilibirum" with the lifeless vacuum of space.

If this is really a law of nature, then how did life on Earth develop cars, toasters and computer games? What kind of entropy is this, developing very complex and ordered matter? It seems to be that the problem is that consciousness itself is the organizing principle that counter-acts and balances entropy, but since science can't really figure out what consciousness is in the first place, it can't attribute these kinds of technical laws to it.

But if I'm not mistaken, some "tricks" have been discovered by which nature actually does become self-organizing and so defeats entropy in its own way. Especially in more complex ecological systems this seems to take place to uncannily that it gave rise to the "Gaia theory" and the idea that the Earth itself may be sentient in some way.

lcam88
18th June 2015, 19:58
It seems to be that the problem is that consciousness itself is the organizing principle that counter-acts and balances entropy, but since science can't really figure out what consciousness is in the first place, it can't attribute these kinds of technical laws to it.


But if I'm not mistaken, some "tricks" have been discovered by which nature actually does become self-organizing and so defeats entropy in its own way.

These are very interesting statements.

I have one comment regarding the first quote: science actually specifically tries to eliminate the consciousness from its examination process as defined in the scientific method. It does this by removing the human element as much as possible from participation in experiments. It is actually standard procedure, for example, at CERN that the scientist leave the room while experiments are being run. That procedure because there is a belief that scientists observing the results while the experiments are being run effect the results, perhaps in accordance with what the scientist desires to see.

The standing scientific theory in place that would oppose the religious creationist views (that god created everything) is the theory of evolution. But it seems that nobody is willing to seriously examine whether or not genetic mutations are truly random (they seem happy to just presume randomness). If a discovery is made where it can be shown that mutations are not truly random, that indeed your second quote has merits for scientific consideration, then they are left having to embrace a new theory, at least closer if not complementary, to the views religion has of creationism.


...how did life on Earth develop cars, toasters and computer games?

This is so golden! Hahahaha.

I will point out that those creations are made in the image of man. Thinking of fractals now...

bsbray
18th June 2015, 20:54
It is actually standard procedure, for example, at CERN that the scientist leave the room while experiments are being run. That procedure because there is a belief that scientists observing the results while the experiments are being run effect the results, perhaps in accordance with what the scientist desires to see.

Aha, so this is really a back-handed way of saying "Yes, we realize by now that consciousness effects physical phenomenon, BUT...."

I can appreciate the idea of objectivity, but I think it was Sam that posted that video about "paralogic" recently and it changed the way I look at the issue. There is no such thing as true objectivity or true subjectivity. Reality is inherently an intricate mix of the two.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZmJUYIsp98

Dreamtimer
18th June 2015, 21:20
Recently came across this phrase in a posting I was reading elsewhere, ““Ordo ab chao”. It has to do with something called the Orion Model.

Shadowself
19th June 2015, 16:25
Good golly miss Molly!

http://i62.tinypic.com/2rra23a.jpg

“You’ve got randomness, and you’ve got order. And right between them, you’ve got the phase transition,”

'The idea is, you want to get as close as possible to chaos, but you don't want to go into the chaos.'

Dedicated to Chaos ~ Getting Started


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gc3GkxqCPks&feature=youtu.be

A phase transition is the transformation of a thermodynamic system from one phase or state of matter to another

Thriving on the Edge of Chaos

http://i61.tinypic.com/29nbdqc.jpg

~

They say a picture is worth a thousand words:

Osiris/Orion

http://i57.tinypic.com/2w33rph.jpg

Bio chemical substance/process produced by the body ~ Without it, well...death would be imminent.

http://i59.tinypic.com/16c1b3a.jpg

Compare the images. Turn one sideways to see the similarity.

So what is that image of?

That's a Glucose transporter (hunter) titled

Beta-D-Glucose which starts the

Gluconeogenesis Pathway consisting of a series of "eleven" enzyme-catalyzed reactions.

In humans the main gluconeogenic precursors are lactate, glycerol, alanine and glutamine.

Glucose is the human body's key source of energy.

Glucose is a primary source of energy for the brain, so its availability influences psychological processes. When glucose is low, psychological processes requiring mental effort (e.g., self-control, effortful decision-making) are impaired.

~

Lactose is a disaccharide sugar derived from galactose and glucose that is found in milk.

Infant mammals nurse on their mothers to drink milk, which is rich in lactose. The intestinal villi secrete the enzyme called lactase (β-D-galactosidase) to digest it. This enzyme cleaves the lactose molecule into its two subunits, the simple sugars glucose and galactose, which can be absorbed. Since lactose occurs mostly in milk, in most mammals, the production of lactase gradually decreases with maturity due to a lack of constant consumption.

http://i61.tinypic.com/szd30y.jpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glucose_transporter

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glycogenolysis

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluconeogenesis

http://youtu.be/JywK_5bT8z0

But that's just silly no?

I suppose we will never know for certain as the library and knowledge in Alexandria was burned to the ground.

~

So what have I just provided in the images here?

The "hour glass" shape of Orion and "hour glass" shape of Glucose have a similarity. But the connotation is different. One is a pattern in the stars. One is a molecular structure of glucose.

That's a symbol of visual semiotics.

Double meanings?

Check it:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6zTvrGirfg&feature=youtu.be

Signs can hypnotize no?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZeTlMpnfHk

And so it begins...

lcam88
19th June 2015, 17:16
Shadowself:

I like to correlation implied between astrology and life. (Orion and the molecule) I once made a similar type of suggestion regarding the lunar cycle to human reproduction as part of a suggestion to something grander - immortality, but I didn't have such good visuals. :)

Myst
19th June 2015, 20:18
.

Myst
19th June 2015, 20:51
.

Shadowself
19th June 2015, 21:04
Very nice Mist.

I think...no I'm certain that like I said earlier there are no wrong answers here. What I'm about to share here.... will be something for everybody to enjoy and ponder of a deeper meaning. It doesn't matter who you are or what you believe. It will manage to connect in a big way. Of this I'm certain. It doesn't even matter how you interpret it. It will have some kind of match to something bigger than what we presume via this thing called Perception.

So, my next post is going to start with a fair amount of measurements. Did I say measurements?

Yes I did....imaging that.

While I'm retrieving some data I have shared before allow me to share some other connotations. I do hope you got a chance to watch the video on Visual Semiotics....it's important to be able to follow what is about to be presented. In fact everything I present here up to and including some pretty heady physics papers will be important. But you don't have to understand all the Math....because the math is quite simple. And math is what you're about to see a great deal of here. I will make it quite simple...so simple you can use a basic dime store calculator and do it yourself. The intricate math and physics is simply the validation to adhere what it's all about. You can read it if you wish and gain a fair amount of understanding without doing the math yourself. But it is actually important to add and back up the data I'm about to share here.

Easy peasy!


Enjoy:

Connotations...

A flower:

The Egyptian Blue Lily
http://i39.tinypic.com/25akx20.jpg

Connotation:
http://i57.tinypic.com/2wck8r4.jpg

Door:
http://i57.tinypic.com/25zm6np.jpg

Egyptian connotation (False door):
http://i41.tinypic.com/2czrrq8.jpg

Chromosome:
http://i40.tinypic.com/2nr1toi.jpg

Isis Knot/Blood of Isis (NO! Really???....We'll see.)
http://i42.tinypic.com/2i9goes.jpg

Game:
http://i58.tinypic.com/10dxdsn.jpg

Egyptian game (tug of war):
http://i60.tinypic.com/svi70h.jpg

Tug of war in Egypt? Oh believe me that's an important one!

Shadowself
19th June 2015, 21:32
First let's start off by measuring sound.

Harmonic Series:

Notice designated numerical value given to f-Sharp

http://i42.tinypic.com/1zzg9z6.jpg

http://i42.tinypic.com/2gy8vsz.jpg

http://i42.tinypic.com/16i8584.jpg

Frequency Wavelength:
http://i40.tinypic.com/107qv51.jpg

Note 11 in Harmonic Series and F-Sharp:

Tom Danley also became interested in the Great Pyramid. Here is an extract from his interview in FATE magazine in 1998.

"In the Great Cheops Pyramid in the King's Chamber an F-sharp chord is resident, sometimes below the range of human hearing. Former NASA consultant Tom Danley feels the sound may be caused by wind blowing cross the ends of the air shafts and causing a pop-bottle effect. These vibrations, some ranging as low a 9 hertz down to 0.5 hertz, are enhanced by the dimensions of the Pyramid, as well as the King's Chamber and the sarcophagus case inside. According to Danley, even the type of stone was selected to enhance these vibrations."

In a 1997 video, JJ Hurtak said "this chord (F-sharp) is the harmonic of planet Earth to which native Americans still tune their instruments, and is in perfect harmony with the human body."

In the Great Pyramid these sounds are infrasonic vibrations, meaning they are below the level of human hearing.

Another researcher, John Reid, an acoustic engineer stated that while he was lying in the coffer and vocalizing various tones he was staggered by the intensity of the reflected energy. He said "the effect of lying in the sarcophagus while toning its prime resonant frequency is almost like taking a bath. Waves of sonic energy wash over your body almost like water".

It does not appear that all this was accidental or incorporated for a burial ritual. It must have had a more important purpose.

While we are on the topic of sound, it is interesting to note that the Grand Gallery seems to be tunable, via it's stepped ceiling construction to four octaves.
The antechamber before the Kings chamber with it's portcullis grooves and granite leaf, is reminiscent of a giant reed, for tuning the cavity.






In music, pitch is the perception of the frequency of a note. For example, the A above middle C is nowadays set at 440 Hz (often written as "A = 440 Hz", and known as concert pitch). Pitch is often cited as one of the fundamental aspects of music.

A Neutron Star in F-sharp:

http://arxiv.org/ftp/astro-ph/papers/0605/0605117.pdf

http://www.world-science.net/othernews/050713_fsharpfrm.htm

Fractal Geometry of Music:

Fractal Geometry and F Sharp.....

Starting with F

Studying the frequency of natural catastrophes, one of us
(K.J.H.) came to realize an inverse log-log linear relation
between the frequency (F) and a parameter expressing the
intensity of the events (M), be they earthquakes, landslides,
floods, or meteorite impacts (2), and the relation can be stated
by the simple equation

F= c/MD.

Only later did we realize that this relation has been called
fractal by Mandelbrot (3), where c is a constant of proportionality
and D is the fractal dimension. Fractal relations have
commonly a lower and an upper limit. In the case of earthquakes,
for example, Eq. 2 holds only for the interval 3 -AM
c 9, because the smallest earthquakes are not represented by
significant statistics, nor is the energy release of large earthquakes
infinite.
Mandelbrot (3) put together certain geometric shapes
whose "monstrous" forms were very irregular and fragmented;
he coined the term fractal to denote them. Those
"monsters" were considered irrelevant to nature, akin to
modern atonal music (4), until Mandelbrot suggested that the
fractal relation could be the central conceptual tool to understand
the harmony of nature.
We have been searching for a meaning of melody. Is it
tradition or convention, or is it an instinctive expression of a
natural law? Could we find a mathematical relation to describe
a melody? Could the music of Bach be mathematically
distinguished from that of Stockhausen? Could we use mathematics
to describe the evolution of music from the primitive
folk's music to the atonal music of today? If music is an
expression of nature's harmony, could music have a fractal
geometry? Which, the atonal or the classical

http://www.pnas.org/content/87/3/938.full.pdf



Proximity ~ Sending out a code


First the bio of Boris Said ~film maker


Boris Said has a very unusual biography beginning with an education at Princeton University and a fluent knowledge of several languages including Russian, French, Italian, Spanish and English. From 1953-1980 Boris was a sportsman and attained several automobile racing speed records. He was a member of the U.S. Olympic Bobsled Team in 1968 and 1972, and in 1980 Said began the transition to film work as he both drove the four-man bobsled at the Lake Placid Olympics and worked on TV interviews for ABC.



Since 1983 his credits have included writing, producing and directing documentaries on bobsledding, dolphins, a Zulu witch doctor, and other varied topics. The 1994 NBC TV feature documentary that he produced with John Anthony West, "The Mysteries of the Sphinx" hosted by Charlton Heston, was awarded an Emmy.

http://youtu.be/SbUsGnMUH2Y

Boris first learned about the mysteries surrounding the monuments in Egypt and the questions about their origins from John Anthony West, when in 1990 West asked him to help make this documentary. West was working with Boston University geologist Dr. Robert Schoch whose ground breaking work indicates that the age of the Sphinx is thousands of years older than the Egyptian civilization itself.

"I came to it with no opinions whatsoever," says Boris, regarding the controversial debates on the new findings.

Note the findings:


We've been testing the sonics of the Great Pyramid. We've known for a long time that if you lie in what they call the sarcophagus, which is that stone box in the King's Chamber cut from a solid piece of granite, and you hum, you hum a scale, for example, there will be certain notes that sound louder and more resonant to you than other notes. And recently we had an opportunity to put sensors all over that pyramid, including the five chambers above the King's Chamber, which I guess we're going to discuss in more detail later, and we found that when we activated the pyramid with hugs speakers and amplifiers in the King's Chamber that all of these sensors resonated, leading us to believe that the entire pyramid was some sort of huge sonic machine."



"What we proved," says Boris, "was when we got back to the laboratory and analyzed our recordings, we found that there were sounds present in the King's Chamber even when we weren't making any sounds. They were below the audible range, below 20 Hertz, below 20 vibrations per second.... Down as far as half a vibration per second, or half a Hertz.



We found that these lower scales had the same five peaks, and when you plotted the peaks on a graph and raised them three or four octaves to where you could hear them, low and behold, it was the same notes. It was the same chord... an F sharp chord, which the early Egyptian texts suggest was a harmonic of Mother Earth. And I might tell you, coincidentally, and we bring this out in our tape, a lot of Native American makers of sacred flutes, tune their flutes to F sharp. Why? Because it's compatible with the harmony of Mother Earth. Now that's just too big a coincidence."

From this source, one of many.

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/piramides/esp_piramide_3.htm


Note:

Below audible (inaudible) range Hertz Noted in this post and the one preceding)

Audible frequency range : generally accepted standard range of audible frequencies is 20 to 20,000 Hz

Frequencies below 20 Hz are generally felt rather than heard, assuming the amplitude of the vibration is great enough.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio_frequency

"They were below the audible range, below 20 Hertz, below 20 vibrations per second.... Down as far as half a vibration per second, or half a Hertz."

11 harmonic series F sharp

(there will be certain notes that sound louder and more resonant to you than other notes)

Proximity:

Pyramidal structure

Granite Chamber (This rock consists mainly of quartz/crystal, mica, and feldspar.)

unpowered radio receivers: A crystal radio receiver

... while other radios use a separate source of electric power such as a battery or the mains power to amplify the weak radio signal from the antenna so it is louder. Thus crystal sets produce rather weak sound and must be listened to with sensitive earphones, and can only pick up stations within a limited range

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_radio


Update: 21ST century

Now you can transmit data to smart devices over inaudible soundwaves

The audio signal, which is inaudible to the human ear, can be broadcasted during a television show, radio broadcast, movie showing, music concert or any other event, and can be received...


technology works by sending out a code as an audio signal from a speaker to any device with a microphone. A companion app provided by Sonic Notify interprets the unique code to deliver the correct content. Everything is based on proximity; once a device gets close enough to the signal, it can receive the data.

Read more at http://venturebeat.com/2012/01/10/sonic … eaYLLgm.99

Handy little app I suppose...but the tech is more relevant to what might seem another type of sonic data delivery system of the ancient sort eh? Which is:

transmitting data over inaudible soundwaves via Crystal/Granite Chamber using 11 harmonic series of F sharp.

So to; using those inaudible soundwaves to get the signal.

Now that's an apparent puzzle eh?

Continuation commencement of "to be continued": perception frequency transmission

And now this to ponder while I gather some other data which eventually led me to the code.

What code? You'll see.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qd92ksKzTKY

Shadowself
19th June 2015, 22:56
Lots of numbers there to ponder in that last video eh?

Some really stick out too.

What about the crystal radio receiver? It's been suggested by many that the top of the great pyramid had in fact a crystal cap and not a gold cap. Interesting no?

So what's all this got to do with 6 degrees of separation and Order from Chaos?

Well....in the video it specifically stated that the Freemasons were particularly fond of certain numbers.

It's also known that "order from Chaos" or better know as "Ordo ab Chao" was the motto of the Freemasons given back in 1395.

So here you have this group that has a definitive leaning toward things of an ancient Egyptian nature and 33 comes into play. An ancient culture that worshiped the sun and measured it's rise and fall to a great degree.

Allow me to show you something most people don't readily know reported by Stanford News.

Measuring Nuclear Decay....

The strange case of solar flares and radioactive elements:


It's a mystery that presented itself unexpectedly: The radioactive decay of some elements sitting quietly in laboratories on Earth seemed to be influenced by activities inside the sun, 93 million miles away.

....

Random numbers


But that assumption was challenged in an unexpected way by a group of researchers from Purdue University who at the time were more interested in random numbers than nuclear decay. (Scientists use long strings of random numbers for a variety of calculations, but they are difficult to produce, since the process used to produce the numbers has an influence on the outcome.)

Ephraim Fischbach, a physics professor at Purdue, was looking into the rate of radioactive decay of several isotopes as a possible source of random numbers generated without any human input. (A lump of radioactive cesium-137, for example, may decay at a steady rate overall, but individual atoms within the lump will decay in an unpredictable, random pattern. Thus the timing of the random ticks of a Geiger counter placed near the cesium might be used to generate random numbers.)

Cessium? Check it:


On Dec 13, 2006, the sun itself provided a crucial clue, when a solar flare sent a stream of particles and radiation toward Earth. Purdue nuclear engineer Jere Jenkins, while measuring the decay rate of manganese-54, a short-lived isotope used in medical diagnostics, noticed that the rate dropped slightly during the flare, a decrease that started about a day and a half before the flare.

If this apparent relationship between flares and decay rates proves true, it could lead to a method of predicting solar flares prior to their occurrence, which could help prevent damage to satellites and electric grids, as well as save the lives of astronauts in space.

Whoa!

But this really caught my attention!

A surprise


Going back to take another look at the decay data from the Brookhaven lab, the researchers found a recurring pattern of 33 days. It was a bit of a surprise, given that most solar observations show a pattern of about 28 days – the rotation rate of the surface of the sun.

The explanation? The core of the sun – where nuclear reactions produce neutrinos – apparently spins more slowly than the surface we see. "It may seem counter-intuitive, but it looks as if the core rotates more slowly than the rest of the sun," Sturrock said.

All of the evidence points toward a conclusion that the sun is "communicating" with radioactive isotopes on Earth, said Fischbach.


http://news.stanford.edu/news/2010/august/sun-082310.html

Now that's some Sirius Measuring! But wait...where's that code? and what about all those numbers? Coming up....


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ozlo2FOs0Ho

Dreamtimer
19th June 2015, 23:20
Anyone ever play Chaos Marauders? It's a super fun board game.

In Games Workshop's Warhammer 40K You can play legions of Chaos Space Marines. This is a system of table role playing/war gaming with models, the modeling and painting also being a competitive art and craft.

There's a whole codex of chaos attributes and powers.

My son liked Space Marines. I liked Sisters of Battle, aka Adepta Sororitas.

Dreamtimer
19th June 2015, 23:31
Regarding the Library of Alexandria, no proof of course, but it seems like what was 'lost' there either went to or was already in the Vatican. One of it's greatest sins beyond crimes against humanity is the theft and possession of the world's knowlege. IMO

It's an insult to humanity each time a few decide for us that we "can't handle the truth".

Shadowself
20th June 2015, 01:10
I agree Dreamtimer...I think we can handle the truth more than any could imagine. If only....

Now I have decided to stop for the evening because my hand is killing me from typing. I have this rare disease I just found out and will probably be getting surgery in the next few weeks. So I simply have to take a break.

The disease is called Kienbock's disease and it's very painful at the moment for me to type. I need to rest my hand and put my brace back on with which I cannot type.

So...take all this in so far and btw this has absolutely nothing to do with Freemason....just the connotation behind the numbers and where it has led and where it is going and what it may really mean.

Pay attention to the numbers in the video I provided earlier as well they have meaning.

Until later....


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9mwELXPGbA&list=FL_ykjY3_7A8F_vL1uYLo-iw&index=41

Dreamtimer
20th June 2015, 01:12
So, we spend all this time talking about randomness and it's not real. Have the evolutionists heard?

I wonder how long the odds-makers have known. Sam?

Now I feel like I need to research knowledge about hubs.

Dreamtimer
20th June 2015, 02:03
So sorry about your hand and the pain. Rest well. I hope your surgery will help.:smiley hug:

Rebel&Rocket
20th June 2015, 03:06
Regarding the Library of Alexandria, no proof of course, but it seems like what was 'lost' there either went to or was already in the Vatican. One of it's greatest sins beyond crimes against humanity is the theft and possession of the world's knowlege. IMO

It's an insult to humanity each time a few decide for us that we "can't handle the truth".

Knowledge is power. I think it's the latter they're keeping from us.

Shadowself
20th June 2015, 13:38
Good morning!

Hand feels rested and thanks for the well wishes. It's will be fine and I'm just glad I caught it soon enough before too much damage is done to the bone in my hand. I've procured a doctor that specializes in this type of surgery so I'm hoping this will all be over soon. I just have to take breaks here when it starts hurting is all.

In case you're not aware I love sharing this information because I think it's something we should all know. It's knowledge that should not be suppressed or coveted for the purpose of some kind of control or dogma! Period!!!

As has been suggested in the video Sacred Geometry in the other post regarding frequency...they pretty much touched on that fact. That all around the world this has been picked up on in some fashion or another. Often time made into religions....hence the idea that the Vatican might retain some of the knowledge from Alexandria....or perhaps it's still noted somewhere in the gardens of Alexandria. No matter though...it's there if you look hard enough like I did. I looked far and wide for a long time. It was almost like a thirst for me....I needed more water. As it turned out "Water" was the primer to the code....;)

Then for a while I teamed up with somebody else and got sidetracked to something else. But I later returned to it. I was determined to understand exactly what I was looking at in this primer. It not only trumped what I got sidetracked with it also explained it! Fancy that!

So on to it...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgzGwKwLmgM

Shadowself
20th June 2015, 14:07
Cryptography:

As it turns out Ancient Egypt was on of the first places to find the early use of Cryptography.

Cryptography is the science or study of techniques of secret writing and message hiding.

The earliest known text containing components of cryptography originates in the Egyptian town Menet.

Note: The ancient Greeks are said to have known of ciphers.

The Rosetta stone was how ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs were deciphered from three languages. One of them and the most prominent for decipherment was Greek.

So as it turns out the greatest help deciphering Ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs was Greek. Not so unusual....but remember the Visual semantics...what you see and what you compute. Is there a cypher and is it cryptography?

What do you suppose John Lennon knew about the number 9 regarding Chaos? A revolution? Or a revelation?

Number 9...number 9...number 9...coming up!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVf5Cr4M-F8

Shadowself
20th June 2015, 14:46
Before I get to the cypher and code I want to show you something I may have shared earlier here but it also belongs here...on this thread because it "computes"...it relates to the code and cypher.

So in the midst of my deciphering the code I ran into a video suggested by a friend.

http://i40.tinypic.com/1znbbzk.jpg
Note three times the hieroglyph for Neith is WATER and the primer for the code!

http://i44.tinypic.com/293btrm.jpg

http://i40.tinypic.com/20rwn4i.jpg


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rc5c608C9RY

Whoa! This had interested me for days!

Because I had a pretty healthy knowledge of ancient Egypt I was drawn to this:

The crown

The goddess Neith (left) and Nephthys before dual images of Osiris

http://i41.tinypic.com/28s7rd0.jpg

http://i41.tinypic.com/2rc5ylg.jpg

The approach used to calculate all the quantities of interest in the theory remains old-fashioned perturbation theory, which assumes a reasonable starting point and then tries to home in on the correct result by adding an infinite series of corrections. In quantum electrodynamics, these perturbation corrections were represented by Feynman diagrams, and, on summing up infinite numbers of terms, results of surprising accuracy were achieved. On the other hand, when it came to gravity, the perturbation series failed totally to represent a curved space-time by adding a finite number of corrections to an initially flat space-time. Perturbation theory is often plagued with infinity, and infinite sum (when the coupling constant is not small). Superstrings are supposed to be a theory about gravity and matter. Yet physicists continue to treat them as if they exist in a flat background space-time, a picture they hope will be corrected by using a perturbation series. Clearly this whole approach is inadequate and obscures the power of the superstrings themselves.

M-theory and duality were introduced to overcome the difficulty. Although this approach have yet to give us definitive information about four-dimensional vacua, they have already clarified much of the nonperturbative nature of string theory in 10, 8, and even 6 dimensions, giving us a complex web of dualities between different string compactifications.

http://universe-review.ca/R15-18-string06.htm

http://i42.tinypic.com/122bwa0.jpghttp://i42.tinypic.com/122bwa0.jpg

In mathematics, a duality, generally speaking, translates concepts, theorems or mathematical structures into other concepts, theorems or structures, in a one-to-one fashion, often (but not always) by means of an involution operation: if the dual of A is B, then the dual of B is A. Such involutions sometimes have fixed points, so that the dual of A is A itself. For example, Desargues' theorem in projective geometry is self-dual in this sense.

Many mathematical dualities between objects of two types correspond to pairings, bilinear functions from an object of one type and another object of the second type to some family of scalars. For instance, linear algebra duality corresponds in this way to bilinear maps from pairs of vector spaces to scalars, the duality between distributions and the associated test functions corresponds to the pairing in which one integrates a distribution against a test function, and Poincaré duality corresponds similarly to intersection number, viewed as a pairing between submanifolds of a given manifold.

Duality can also be seen as a functor, at least in the realm of vector spaces.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duality_%28mathematics%29

NOW:

Look at the glyph I posted once again....

Neith: Her name also may be interpreted as meaning water.

Nephthys: goddess of rivers.


http://youtu.be/oxKCPjcvbys

Double vision/double meaning

HINT:

The secret is in the throne....

In linear algebra terms, the dual code is the annihilator of C with respect to the bilinear form <,>. The dimension of C and its dual always add up to the length n:

\dim C + \dim C^\perp = n.

A generator matrix for the dual code is a parity-check matrix for the original code and vice versa. The dual of the dual code is always the original code.

A self-dual code is one which is its own dual. This implies that n is even and dim C = n/2. If a self-dual code is such that each codeword's weight is a multiple of some constant c > 1, then it is of one of the following four types:

Type I codes are binary self-dual codes which are not doubly even.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_code

"Doubly-even self-dual linear binary error-correcting block code


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1LCVknKUJ4&feature=youtu.be

HINT:

The secret is in the throne....look at it closely.

http://i41.tinypic.com/28s7rd0.jpg

Type I codes are binary self-dual codes which are not doubly even.

~

Count the lines in the throne.

~

"Doubly-even self-dual linear binary error-correcting block code"

supersymmetry (SUSY)

~

Throne: Seat of power

(will explain more later)

~

Is everything CODE?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sl6P_cGXEtk&feature=youtu.be

crown of Nephthys (in image above)

Inverted Throne....topped with the NEB

~

http://i43.tinypic.com/x3zlzr.jpg

NEB: "everything", or "all things"

~

Two Goddess' of WATER

Osiris: also a God of Water

https://www.google.com/search?q=osiris+god+of+water&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

~

WATER is the PRIMER in the Code!

Shadowself
20th June 2015, 15:09
Current string theory in Ancient Egypt? Nah....could it be? And if so...how? We've only begun to scratch the surface...or so it seems eh?

Max Tegmark wrote a book and said this theory can't be discribed in 6 numbers.....[6 degrees]

Apparatjiks made a little song and here it is:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZBJGzoVPzA

Shadowself
20th June 2015, 15:57
A rather funny thing happened on the way to the my repository of information....(((amused))). It's having "server" problems.

Which i find quite amusing....surly I wouldn't be silly enough to make that the ONLY repository no?

So on to number nine but I must tell you on that white album of the Beatles was another song and it was suggested to me and quite a few other...then ERASED (when I took time out with another person and team) that the PTB...the secret groups or what ever had tried to emulate an Egyptian Pyramid in Russia!

Is it funny on that same White Album the Beatles wrote this song? (((amused)))

Like I said earlier.....this trumps that all day long!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PF7zjPTmvAQ

Taking a little break due to hand issues....will be back shortly...and I promise before the weekend is over I will show you the code.

Server issues? Really? funny that...(((amused)))

Shadowself
20th June 2015, 17:28
It's been said if there is anybody "out there"...they would communicate with numbers. A universal language?

So I have to tell you I ran into that Sacred Geometry video long after I discovered the code and the numbers. It just fit in so nicely with what I found.

For example this:

432 divided by 9 is 48.

9 x 9 = 81

81 - 48 = 33

Numbers and their series....but to what exactly?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHYIGy1dyd8&feature=youtu.be

Starting off with nine:

In ancient Egypt there were 9 primary gods.

The Ennead (Ancient Greek: meaning a collection of nine things)

http://i41.tinypic.com/10yjs49.jpg

Now depending on the cult in charge at the time you won's see some interesting and popular gods.

Where is Thoth? Ptah? Sekhmet or Hathor?

Where is Neith the one spoken of earlier on in this thread?

In the case of Osiris and Isis...Horus (who is not one of the nine) is born.

Perhaps there's another way to look at these Nine gods.

Perhaps they are principals?

I ran into a scroll. On this scroll was listed nine principals.

Out of these principals are born others...

The first four Principals written were fairly basic Physics.

1) Compression
2) Spin
3) Spark
4) Mass

Now before I get to number five and 6 which was a doozy!!! I'll tell you I've already provided number 7 which was frequency. But I've not shown you how it was used in conjunction with the Pyramid ...yet.

In number 5 & 6 you'll see the god Set/Seth/God of Chaos like you've never seen him before. The corresponding numbers as well.

While I gather more data...for the moment I leave you with the early Pre-Newtonian concepts of measuring Mass and their corresponding Gods :

Scale balances the force of one object's/mass weight against the force of another object's/mass weight.

http://i44.tinypic.com/15otjtk.jpg

Perhaps in all these numbers we'll be saved by zero?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JOiZP8FS5Ww

Shadowself
20th June 2015, 18:10
Number 5 kicked my butt!

I was so confused at first! Then it all came together...especially with number 6 yet to be revealed!

First off I deciphered:

Divide/Split/Duplicate

It confused the hell out of me. I just could not figure it out. Until....

I turned to my trusty guide Artemis (Anagram:Master I) and a dream I had about number five. Call it a metaphor if you will but it has deep scientific meaning which I will show you.

So I meet up with Artemis and he took me somewhere I've never seen before. I'm placed between a rather long row of stoic men standing shoulder to shoulder. Staring straight forward. Artemis directs me to walk between them. I had no idea what was at the end of this row of men. while walking between the row of men I ask Artemis is this in the past or future. He says "neither, this is now".

I turn the corner and see flashes of light. Flashes of darkness. I ask him what is this you're showing me? He reminds me of the time I had written about "life during wartime" and my statement of Syria a few years ago.

I ask "what's going on here"? he says:

The War of Lights.

I ask him again...what can I do about this? I'm handed a glass of yellow liquid. I ask "what is that"?

You'll find out...it's more than a drink. It's the "Golden Elixir".

Which meant it was far more complicated and I needed to research it.

so he looked me straight in the eye and said...

The 5th: Discretion...

That's a biggie!

The act of discretion encompasses cause and effect as well as free will.

Discretion: the right to choose what should be done in a particular situation

: the quality of being careful about what you do and say

: the quality of having or showing discernment or good judgment

: ability to make responsible decisions

: individual choice or judgment

And so on.

So I proceeded to look up Golden Elixir. To which I fell out of my chair as I was transported far from Egypt!

Jiudan jing...The Book of NINE Elixirs.

Jiuhua dan (Elixir of the Nine Efflorescence's)

Alternative name...Elixir of Great Clarity


Efflorescence: A state or time of flowering; anthesis. A gradual process of unfolding or developing. The deposit that results from the process of efflorescing. Also called bloom.

Jindan : or Golden Elixir

Gold represents the state of constancy and immutability beyond the change and transiency that characterize the cosmos.

Enjoy the reading...I know I did!

PDF here:

http://www.goldenelixir.com/files/Taoist_Alchemy_Historical_Overview.pdf

http://www.goldenelixir.com/files/Book_of_the_Nine_Elixirs_SAMPLE.pdf

Yellow Court Classic

This process of Internal Alchemy doesn't rely on society, environment or any external ingredients.
(according to Jade Emperor's "Mind Sealing Classic", Elixir of Immortality is fully in ourselves, very subtle and neither physical nor intellectual). Transformations start and end (in every cycle) in Oneself, through Oneself, by Oneself. The Alchemy (Divine Chemistry) is an internal Symmetry of the Spiritual Beings, that preserves their awareness and identity through all changes of the temporal world.

http://jadewriting.org/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_Court_Classic

~

Exercising Discretion (number 5) in The Infinite Field of Potential is rather important no?

Relevant theory:

Causality
Domino Effect
Chain Reaction
Actuality and potentiality

Spoken of in the illustrated Sutra of Cause and Effect

http://www.kyohaku.go.jp/eng/dictio/shoseki/50einga.html

And...quite importantly:

The Butterfly Effect which directly correlates to Chaos Theory!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly_effect

On to Number 6 documented in an Ancient Tomb....with all the numbers I've provided so far and the code.

Discretion would certainly encompass a Universal Principal to achieve...dot dot dot... eh?

Shadowself
20th June 2015, 19:23
Takin a break folks.....hand stuff. Think I'm going to put my headphones on and listen to jams. Be back soon.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=biXnwOMznkg

Oh...Post number 33...wadda ya know!

Dreamtimer
21st June 2015, 12:05
I'm finding myself wishing I had a much better foundation of knowledge. (It's getting bigger even as I write) Your presentation is very good and so interesting. Thanks for sharing and enlightening. ;)

Shadowself
21st June 2015, 12:54
You're welcome Dreamtimer. I didn't come upon this information and knowledge lightly. In fact I didn't have much of a choice. Of course I could have ignored it but that would have been very hard to do if you knew the history behind how I came upon it.

I became afflicted with this little thing called "time" and a very early age. In fact this tomb I'm about to show you all here is all about...TIME in a big way.

Ramesses II Was Ozymandias

Upon a cash of ancient Egyptian Collections Shelly writes a sonnet.


"I met a traveller from an antique land

Who said: "Two vast and trunkless legs of stone

Stand in the desert. Near them on the sand,

Half sunk, a shattered visage lies, whose frown

And wrinkled lip and sneer of cold command

Tell that its sculptor well those passions read

Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,

The hand that mocked them and the heart that fed.

And on the pedestal these words appear:

`My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings:

Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair!'

Nothing beside remains. Round the decay

Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare,

The lone and level sands stretch far away".

~ Shelly~


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dO1rMeYnOmM

Shadowself
21st June 2015, 16:29
You know...that six degrees of separation and being connected to this is part of something I simply cannot deny. Nor can Ignore.

It's taken me years of research...Some things along the way I got very wrong. Due to this thing called perception. In fact I gave it a name several years ago and wrote about. I called it the 180 turnaround. It involved perception.

Basically if your physical mind can't comprehend, it fills in with what I called pixels with the next best thing that you CAN comprehend. Kinda like a reference point to the information. If it's not in the biological "mind file" it can only fill in the pixel with what it does know. This is not to be confused with the internal/higher mind and spirit/stir pi of another nature of self. It's about integrating the two levels of information and the pixel "plug in". It's been suggested we already know most of what we search for, it's just not in the data base of the biological mind for review due to the lack of data input in the conscious mind. ie; lack of data/knowledge in the conscious mind.

In that process there's a great chance you can miss something or miss perceive something. I missed some things. Big time back then!

That was back then how I described it and actually saw it.

In that; this time affliction I have is not something I would call a gift. But I've experienced time slips in a big way. Unfortunately most (if not all) of those time slips surrounded death. Now the fact that I have know at a certain point which I've written about extensively and people have witnessed I've actually proven it. No need for any experiment here. Also not surprising I apparently have had a past life in Egypt which is most likely why most of those time slips involved death...as it's no secret the Egyptians again were obsessed with the After life.

After life ~ TIME after death

Now in my research I learned quite a bit. Particularly hieroglyphs. When you see something that has ABSOLUTELY no place in a tomb for the time era it was made...you begin to question it's origins.

Which I did. The tomb in question has plenty of things that in this particular persons tomb make no sense. They do not relate to the deceased AT ALL. Who this person was and why this would be there.

So I'm going to throw some things that relate to this in a big way before I get to it. IF is seems out of place...understand it will connect once I get into the tomb and it's origins and creation.

Shadowself
21st June 2015, 16:47
so I'll start with:

Shi Shen;

4th century BC was a Chinese astronomer and contemporary of Gan De born in the State of Wei, also known as the Master Shi Shen.

Shi is credited with positioning the 121 stars found in the preserved texts. Shen also made the earliest surviving undated record of sunspot observation, which is sometimes erroneously credited to Gan De. He assumed that these spots were eclipses that began at the center of the sun and spread outward. Although he was wrong, he recognized the spots for what they were – solar phenomena.

Solar phenomena...

Stone carving by Huang Shang...

star chart rubbing

http://i61.tinypic.com/2q3b0qq.jpg


What's this got to do with the price of tea in China?

Egypt for that matter?

Shi Shen was one of several "Masters" of any given civilization who marveled at the stars. A pastime that never died out. In fact became a quest and race between nations in our day. One we've all though about at some time or another I'm certain.

In Ancient times it was supposed the quest to discover what's out there was based on seasons for planting. Sacrificial rituals to the Sun Gods, to reap a better crop during the season and such. Some civilizations had a booming voice from the sky sending messages and warning to heed otherwise the wrath would be great.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ozlo2FOs0Ho


I used that particular song because it expresses one particular thing. The path we all travel, yet the promise that home is always there for you.

Lyrics in the song: Just know that where ever you go you're not alone.

http://i58.tinypic.com/2drtlqd.jpg

My personal quest for the Red Dot was something I've been working on since I was very young. Now I started to tell this story once but stopped. I figured what does it matter anyhow! Well it matters to me. In the quest to find some answers and the Red Dot I ran into some rather interesting things and people along the way.

What do you suppose drove Shi Shen to map the stars?

Probably the same thing that drives me to find the Red Dot...

One of the main reasons I happened to join my first ever forum (the original Avalon) was because I was searching for some answers as to the why, and hows of a personal nature of events within my own personal experience.

So ... one particular dimension and concept. That would be Time. Speaking of time please note the date on some of the referred links to some coming posts I'll add here soon. It's rather important to understand the two things I'm going to refer to right now.

Time: Is a dimension in which events are ordered from the past through the present into the future.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time

Pretty basic concept.

Now another concept. A thought experiment:

Retrocausality: Is any of several hypothetical phenomena or processes that reverse causality, allowing an effect to occur before its cause. Retrocausality is primarily a thought experiment in philosophy of science based on elements of physics, addressing the question: Can the future affect the present, and can the present affect the past?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retrocausality


Can the Future or present effect the past?

Back From the Future

A series of quantum experiments shows that measurements performed in the future can influence the present. Does that mean the universe has a destiny—and the laws of physics pull us inexorably toward our prewritten fate?

http://discovermagazine.com/2010/apr/01-back-from-the-future#.UvJ0nbQr2eA


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARgiPJobKnE&feature=youtu.be

Shadowself
21st June 2015, 17:10
I discovered time stamp through some investigation. It's an ancient one as well. Get prepared.

Mystery of Time in a Bottle

~

Cause and effect:

What would Shi Shen say?

Relevant physical theory:

Causality
Chain reaction
Butterfly effect

Which will bring us to the

Infinite field of Potential

&

6 degrees of separation

93 million miles from the sun song in the previous post by John Mraz

Merritt Lear in the video is the Violin player and good friend of my late son. That video was also made on My son's birthday June 26 after his death. They were skydiving buddies.

http://i44.tinypic.com/2z6v7gg.jpg

Then somebody made this video about my son with whom they worked.

What's the last thing you see?:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjDCeiENR0M

In this video provided here with the "time code operations" in the pages he's flipping through....it closes with him holding a bridge.

Ever heard of an Einstein–Rosen bridge?

Better known as a wormhole?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole

On May 3rd (the day before he died)... out of flippin nowhere my computer plays:

http://youtu.be/ClQcUyhoxTg

http://i60.tinypic.com/2prefpg.jpg

I don't know....I think it needs more cowbell!

That day I was writing about a subject I'm going to put in the next post. But it's pretty clear in the image if you look at it.

Perhaps this is all coincidence. We've all heard of people who lose a loved one who have a premonition prior to or during the time of their death. It's not uncommon.

What I've just provided here is however a whole lot more than premonition and I'll show you why later.


Merritt was also hanging with this guy that summer.


http://i61.tinypic.com/14kdzlt.jpg

Which brings me to the next post and this:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pPvNqOb6RA

Do you think somebody was trying to tell me something?

Shadowself
21st June 2015, 17:28
What I was writing about at the time that video out of nowhere played on my computer was the Bath and Wells Cathedral and the profuse Egyptian Decor with the the two Cathedrals.

Why you might ask? Because somebody urged me to take a look at the Bath Cathedral that's why.

At the time I noted also the connection to the Anglican Church and the Coptic Church which in case you were not aware are considering merging as one church. It's just a consideration mind you....but it's been suggested.

Of course the Coptic Church is Egyptian based christian if you will...and very much in alignment with the Anglican Church....Which is what the Bath and Wells Cathedral are.

Within the Wells Cathedral and on the front of the Bath Cathedral are Jacobs Ladder...or as some might describe it...The stairway to heaven....to the stars.

Bath Cathedral:

http://i62.tinypic.com/11hbex4.jpg

Wells Cathedral:

Stairway to heaven...black pillars are the pillars of Ptah/Path

http://i59.tinypic.com/1iixzn.jpg

In fact here's a virtual tour of that hallway featuring the Pillars of Ptah/Path.

Run your mouse up down and around. You can even move in for a closer view.

http://www.learn.columbia.edu/ha/html/medieval_wells_chapter_stairs.htm

In the Wells Cathedral right above Jesus sits a Clock:

An Astronomical Clock to be precise!

http://i60.tinypic.com/altauw.jpg

Here is the virtual tour of that:

http://www.learn.columbia.edu/ha/html/medieval_wells_n_main_tran.htm

That stairway at the Wells Cathedral leads to three stars if take the virtual tour. Three circular windows at the top.

Resembling this:

http://i58.tinypic.com/do80ok.jpg

On that ladder on front of the Bath Abby sits this:
http://i58.tinypic.com/6f05l4.jpg

That is no ordinary cross. That is the cross of Ptah/Path

http://i59.tinypic.com/21aa3w1.jpg

http://i62.tinypic.com/2hpk87b.jpg

http://i57.tinypic.com/1626skg.jpg


next....about that.

Shadowself
21st June 2015, 17:32
So....we know about this fancy ladder of divine ascent.....Jacob's Ladder.

The theme of the ladder to heaven is often used by the Early Church Fathers: Saint Irenaeus in the 2nd century describes the Christian Church as the ladder of ascent to God

In the 4th century Saint Gregory of Nazianzus speaks of ascending Jacob's Ladder by successive steps towards excellence, interpreting thus the ladder as an ascetic path, while Saint Gregory of Nyssa narrates that Moses climbed on Jacob's Ladder to reach the heavens where he entered the tabernacle not made with hands, thus giving to the Ladder a clear mystical meaning.

The ascetic interpretation is found also in Saint John Chrysostom who writes:

And so mounting as it were by steps, let us get to heaven by a Jacob’s ladder. For the ladder seems to me to signify in a riddle by that vision the gradual ascent by means of virtue, by which it is possible for us to ascend from earth to heaven, not using material steps, but improvement and correction of manners.

Saint John Chrysostom?

Check this Saint out:

http://i57.tinypic.com/66gfhy.jpg

John Chrysostom (c. 347–407, Greek: Ἰωάννης ὁ Χρυσόστομος), Archbishop of Constantinople, was an important Early Church Father. He is known for his eloquence in preaching and public speaking, his denunciation of abuse of authority by both ecclesiastical and political leaders, the Divine Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom, and his ascetic sensibilities. After his death in 407 (or, according to some sources, during his life) he was given the Greek epithet chrysostomos, meaning "golden mouthed" in English.

John is known in Christianity chiefly as a preacher, theologian and liturgist. Among his homilies, eight directed against Judaizing Christians remain controversial for their impact on the development of Christian antisemitism.

Really? I didn't write that..... but check this out....

The Orthodox and Eastern Catholic Churches honor him as a saint and count him among the Three Holy Hierarchs, together with Basil the Great and Gregory Nazianzus. He is recognized by the Eastern Orthodox Church and the Catholic Church as a saint and as a Doctor of the Church. Churches of the Western tradition, including the Roman Catholic Church, some Anglican provinces, and parts of the Lutheran Church, commemorate him on 13 September. Some Lutheran and many Anglican provinces commemorate him on the traditional Eastern feast day of 27 January.

The Coptic Orthodox Church of Alexandria also recognizes John Chrysostom as a saint (with feast days on 16 Thout and 17 Hathor).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Chrysostom

Say what? This is news to me.....so what is this Feast day of Thout and Hathor????????

Check it....note the date.....

Month of Hathor

Hathor also known as Hatour, is the third month of the Coptic calendar. It lies between November 10 and December 9 of the Gregorian calendar. The month of Hathor is also the third month of the Season of 'Akhet' (Inundation) in Ancient Egypt, when the Nile floods historically covered the land of Egypt; they have not done so since the construction of the High Dam at Aswan.

The name of the month comes from Hathor, the Ancient Egyptian Goddess of Beauty and Love.


Thout

Thout , also known as Tout, is the first month of the Coptic calendar. It lies between 11 September and 10 October of the Gregorian calendar. The month of Thout is also the first month of the Season of Akhet (Inundation) in Ancient Egypt, when the Nile floods historically covered the land of Egypt; it has not done so since the construction of the High Dam at Aswan.
The name of the month comes from Thoth, the Ancient Egyptian God of Wisdom.
Yikes! September 11th?!?!


Now...correct me if I'm wrong...but was it not blamed on Osama Bin Laden the whole 9/11 thing? And was it not due to the Palestinian Israel conflict that he supposedly attacked the US over our support of Israel? Or something along those lines?

So ....just for kicks and giggles...lets check out one of these dates....perhaps the Thout end date of this time of "October 10th"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/October_10

It sure the hell seems to me this "feast" date is a bit busy...not to mention the starting date of September 11th!!!

But wait....check it and keep in mind I was writing about this when that damned Song "don't fear the reaper" came on my computer!

Here's the Orthodox Coptic Calendar:

http://orthodoxwiki.org/Coptic_Calendar

Look at the Month of:
Paremoude

Paremoude also known as Barmouda is the eighth month of the Coptic calendar. It lies between April 9 and May 8of the Gregorian calendar. The month of Paremoude is also the fourth month of the Season of 'Proyet' (Growth) in Ancient Egypt, where the Nile floods recede and the crops start to grow throughout the land of Egypt. The name of the month of Paremoude comes from Renno, the Ancient Egyptian God of severe wind and death.
Between April 9th and May 8th is the month named after Renno...the Ancient Egyptian God of severe wind and death.

~

When my son died I happened to run across all his many journals just before his funeral....in this journal one entry was written in 1994



I wasn't feeling like working so I thought $150.00 to sit up in the condor and babysit a 12K would be pretty relaxed and maybe even fun. So here I am 80 feet above the ground with cars driving under me. the base of this thing doesn't look much bigger than a car and I have a lot of weight up here. The base which is supporting on it's side the lesser angle. I am reminded of a dream I had about a month ago with the same strange camera crane at some intersection. Similar to this one. I was not on the rig I was at a house nearby. And a sudden storm, a wind storm started up and I ran to see if their rig was alright but I never made it there because I noticed that I could swim in the wind currents like I was in water, doing flips and flowing, gracefully. Well enough of that, but if something does happen, let it be said that I predicted my early demise as my father did.

John of course died May 4th....during the month of Paremoude...the month named after the god of severe wind and death!


What a strange coincidence.......Dot dot dot.

This is just scratching the surface....


It also behooves me to tell you....regarding this Coptic Calendar:

Feast of Coptic Martyrs:
Ironically, the attack of September 11 occurred on the same day that Coptic Orthodox Christians, throughout the world, were commemorating the "Feast of Nayrouz", which honors the memory of the martyrdom of Egypt's Christians throughout the centuries. The Coptic calender begins on the first day of Thout, called "Nayrouz" a Persian word, meaning "the beginning of the year," which coincides with September the eleventh five centuries, when Gregorian calender replaced the Egyptian (Julian after adoption from Alexandria)in 1582. It commemorates the start of the torturous rule of Diocletianus, in memorial of tens of thousands of Coptic martyrs. His reign is considered the era in which the church offered absolute witnesses to Christ, when the souls of martyrs departed to paradise and kept shining as bright stars therein.


Now....
A martyr is somebody who suffers persecution and death for refusing to renounce, or accept, a belief or cause, usually religious. To top it off this is New Year's day in the Coptic Orthodox Church of Alexandria

How many Martyrs did you count on September 11, 2001?

Shadowself
21st June 2015, 17:39
So for the longest time after that video of John and the camera I thought he said "How do you set the damned Death Stop".

That is not what he said at all.

What he said is, "How do you set the damned F stop"?

In optics, the f-number (sometimes called focal ratio, f-ratio, f-stop, or relative aperture) of an optical system is the ratio of the lens's focal length to the diameter of the entrance pupil. It is a dimensionless number that is a quantitative measure of lens speed, and an important concept in photography.

Computing the f-number of the human eye involves computing the physical aperture and focal length of the eye.

In astronomy, the f-number is commonly referred to as the focal ratio (or f-ratio) .
Even though the principles of focal ratio are always the same, the application to which the principle is put can differ. In photography the focal ratio varies the focal-plane illuminance (or optical power per unit area in the image) and is used to control variables such as depth of field. When using an optical telescope in astronomy, there is no depth of field issue, and the brightness of stellar point sources in terms of total optical power (not divided by area) is a function of absolute aperture area only, independent of focal length.

The ancient Egyptians Looked at the stars...Master Shi Shen looked at the stars....the Mayans and Egyptian Coptic's made calendars about these stars and to see them requires Optics.

They made measuring with the Eye and distance precise.

http://i39.tinypic.com/1zn4ryw.jpg

Typical one half, one third, one quarter...etc....F Stop:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-number

"the focal ratio varies the focal-plane illuminance......"

Illuminance ....sounds like?

Shadowself
21st June 2015, 17:43
So what does that have to do with time you ask? Plenty.

~ Time ~

“I don’t understand you,” said Alice. “It’s dreadfully confusing!”
“That’s the effect of living backwards,” the Queen said kindly:
“it always makes one a little giddy at first—”
“Living backwards!” Alice repeated in great astonishment. “I
never heard of such a thing!”
“–but there’s one great advantage in it, that one’s memory
works both ways.”
“I’m sure mine only works one way,” Alice remarked. “I can’t
remember things before they happen.”
“It’s a poor sort of memory that only works backwards,” the
Queen remarked.

~ Tell 'em a hookah smoking caterpillar Has given you the call ~


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WANNqr-vcx0

All right,’ said the Cat; and this time it vanished quite slowly,
beginning with the end of the
tail, and ending with the grin, which remained
some time after the rest of it had gone.
‘Well! I've often seen a cat without a grin,’
thought Alice, ’but a grin without a cat! It’s the
most curious thing I ever saw in my life!’

http://i42.tinypic.com/2ebu26o.jpg

No wonder Alice is surprised. In real life, assuming
that cats do indeed smile, then the smile is a property of
the cat – it makes no sense to think of a smile without a
cat. And this goes for almost all physical properties. The
polarization is a property of a photon, it makes no sense
to have a polarization without a photon. Yet, as we will
show here, in the interesting way of quantum mechanics, a photon polarization may exist where there is no
photon at all. At least this is the story that quantum mechanics tells via pre- and post-selected measurements.

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1202.0631.pdf

We have shown that Cheshire cats have a place in
quantum mechanics – physical properties can be
disembodied from the objects they belong to in a pre- and
post-selected experiment. Although here we have only
presented one example where a photon is disembodied
from its polarization, it should be clear that this effect is
completely general – we can separate, for example the
spin from the charge of an electron, or internal energy
of an atom from the atom itself. Furthermore it is important
to realize that is not just that pointers of well prepared
measuring devices indicate that the properties
are disembodied – any external system which interacts
weakly with the pre- and post-selected system will react
accordingly.
This therefore opens many intriguing questions, both
conceptual and applied ones. First of all, how will
an electron with charge and mass disembodied effect


A nearby electron? In an atom with the internal energy disembodied from the mass, what will the resulting
gravitational field look like? What sort of thermal equilibrium will achieved by a system whose two degrees
of freedom are separated? Furthermore, when considering more than two degrees of freedom, can we separate
them all from each other? Can photons impart angular
momentum to one object while their radiation pressure
is felt by another object?

On the applied side, we may ask whether Cheshire
cats are useful in precision measurements, just as weak
measurements themselves have now shown to be useful
as a powerful amplification technique .

Suppose​

for example that we wish to perform a measurement​

in which the magnetic moment plays the central role,​

whilst the charge causes unwanted disturbances. Using
this scheme it would appear possible to remove this disturbance, in a post-selected manner (i.e. heralded), by
producing a Cheshire cat where the charge is confined
to a region of the experiment far from the magnetic moment.

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1202.0631.pdf


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ooLby5mluRo&feature=youtu.be

Shadowself
21st June 2015, 17:46
Can a Future Choice Affect a Past Measurement's
Outcome?
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1206/1206.6224.pdf

Our proof rests on two well-established findings: i) Bell's nonlocality
theorem and ii) The causal asymmetry between weak and strong
measurements.
The EPR-Bell experiment proves that one particle's spin outcome
depends on the choice of the spin-orientation to be measured on the other
particle, and its outcome thereof. Relativistic locality is not necessarily
violated in this experiment, as it allows that it was either Alice whose
choices affected Bob's, or vice versa.

This reciprocity, however, does not hold for a combination of
measurements of which one is weak and the other strong. The latter
affects the former, never vice versa. Therefore, when a weak
measurement precedes a strong one, the only possible direction for the
causal effect is from future to past.
We stress again that attempt to dismiss the weak measurement's peculiar
outcomes by invoking some subtle collapse due to the weak
measurement, or any other form of contaminating the initial superposed
states, have been thoroughly considered and ruled out.
Also, while earlier predictions derived from the TSVF were sometimes
dismissed as counter factuals, there is nothing counter factual in the
experiments proposed in this paper. Our predictions refer to actual
measurements whose outcomes are objectively recorded.

~

“Could the laws of physics be pulling us inexorably toward our prewritten fate?”

“if a particle’s past doesn’t contain enough information to determine its fate, then maybe its future does.”


A series of quantum experiments seems to actually confirm the notion that the future can influence results that happened before those measurements were even made.


“looking into the notion that time might flow backward, allowing the future to influence the past. By extension, the universe might have a destiny that reaches back and conspires with the past to bring the present into view. On a cosmic scale, this idea could help explain how life arose in the universe against tremendous odds. On a personal scale, it may make us question whether fate is pulling us inexorably forward and whether we have free will.”

http://youtu.be/LWTLUmUjo8A

Ticking away the moments that make up a dull day
You fritter and waste the hours in an offhand way.
Kicking around on a piece of ground in your home town
Waiting for someone or something to show you the way.

http://i60.tinypic.com/9vd2mc.jpg

http://i59.tinypic.com/28gsb52.jpg

"Compare Sri Yantra" to Tamara Davis's Fig 1.1

Fig from:

http://www.physics.uq.edu.au/downloa...s_complete.pdf


I have noticed even people who claim everything is predestined, and that we can do nothing to change it,

look before they cross the road...

Stephen Hawking​

Shadowself
21st June 2015, 17:54
Now my guess is you're not going to read all those peer reviewed papers written and posted at the Cornell University Library. IF you do good on you. The math threw me so I had to simply suppose it was correct in retrospect as it was posted there after being peer reviewed.

So what does it all mean? This debate about quantum mechanics and particle measurement? It can be quite confusing to the layman. I know it took me several passes to grasp. I suspect this is the reason some people (myself included at one time) could fall for the George's of the world spouting some pretty bold ideas about Ascension and the fifth dimension. Particularly at a time when the Mayan Calendar was about to explode right in our faces and the world was going to make some magnetic flip of the poles and WTF were/are we going to do?

And what EXACTLY IS the "5th" dimension we're supposed to traverse into?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five-dimensional_space

Ahhh I see said the blind man!

So, what's the major deal with moving in time or time travel? Premonition and dreams of that sort are a form of time travel. If you see something before it happens and it does then it's pretty safe to say some part of your conscious traveled to get the data and return with it. Via dream or simple intuition of an event about to happen. But when does a computer warn you of an impending event? Are we living in a PK Dick novel and narration/implementation of a program? Is that even possible?

Going back in time the Paradox is a major concern. Easy...I got that straight away.

So what we do know for certain is we are in the Milky Way whose center is a black hole. Einstein was proven right that we are in fact sitting in a time vortex:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkAPv5s92z0&feature=youtu.be

One conclusion is "Time is an Illusion". Well hold up a minute...the Effect of time is an illusion. But time is only an illusion as "we know it".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temporal_paradox

Then there's the paradox of "Spooky Action at a distance".

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1203.1139v4.pdf

Einstein's "Spooky Action at a Distance" Paradox Older Than Thought


Einstein's phrase "spooky action at a distance" has become synonymous with one of the most famous episodes in the history of physics—his battle with Bohr in the 1930s over the completeness of quantum mechanics.
Einstein's weapons in this battle were thought experiments that he designed to highlight what he believed were the inadequacies of the new theory.
The most famous of these is the EPR paradox, announced in 1935 and named after its inventors Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen.
It involves a pair of particles linked by the strange quantum property of entanglement (a word coined much later). Entanglement occurs when two particles are so deeply linked that they share the same existence. In the language of quantum mechanics, they are described by the same mathematical relation known as a wavefunction.
Entanglement arises naturally when two particles are created at the same point and instant in space, for example.
Entangled particles can become widely separated in space. But even so, the mathematics implies that a measurement on one immediately influences the other, regardless of the distance between them.
Einstein and co pointed out that according to special relativity, this was impossible and therefore, quantum mechanics must be wrong, or at least incomplete. Einstein famously called it spooky action at a distance.
The EPR paradox stumped Bohr and was not resolved until 1964, long after Einstein's death. CERN physicist John Bell resolved it by thinking of entanglement as an an entirely new kind of phenomenon, which he termed "nonlocal."
The basic idea here is to think about the transfer of information. Entanglement allows one particle to instantaneously influence another but not in a way that allows classical information to travel faster than light. This resolved the paradox with special relativity but left much of the mystery intact. These days, the curious nature of entanglement is the subject of intense focus in labs around the world.
But that doesn't tell the full story, says Hrvoje Nikoli at the Rudjer Boskovic Institute in Croatia. Today, he reveals that although history first records this paradox in 1935, Einstein unknowingly stumbled across it much earlier, in 1930.

At this time, he was working on another paradox, which he presented at the 6th Solvay Conference in Brussels in 1930. This problem focused on the Heisenberg uncertainty relation between energy and time, which states that you cannot measure both with high accuracy.

To challenge this, Einstein came up with the following thought experiment. Imagine a box that can be opened and closed quickly and which contains an ensemble of photons. When open, the box emits a single photon.

The time of emission can be measured with arbitrary precision--it's just the length of time for which the box was open. According to quantum mechanics, this limits the resolution with which you can measure the photon's energy.

But Einstein pointed out that this too can be measured with arbitrary precision, not by measuring the photon but by measuring the change of energy of the box when the photon is emitted, which must be equal to the energy of the photon. Therefore, quantum mechanics is inconsistent, he said.

Einstein's great rival, Bohr, puzzled long and hard over this but eventually came up with the following argument. He said that Einstein's own theory of general relativity provided the answer.

Since the measurement of time takes place in a gravitational field, the lapse in time during which the box is open must also depend on the box's position.
The uncertainty in position is an additional factor that Einstein had not taken into account, and this, according to Bohr, resolved the paradox. Einstein was sent packing.
Of course, this is not a very satisfactory answer to the modern eye. It implies, for one thing, that quantum mechanics requires general relativity to be consistent, an idea that modern physicists would roundly reject.

Nikoli says this problem has never been satisfactorily analyzed from a modern perspective. Until now.

He says the proper resolution is to think of the total energy of the system, which is the energy of the box and the energy of the photon. The total energy is constant and governed by a single mathematical entity, even after the photon is emitted.

So the box and the photon must be entangled.
This immediately raises the problem that Einstein later hit on in the EPR paradox. A measurement on the box immediately influences the photon and vice versa--spooky action at a distance.
For this reason, the photon paradox is equivalent to the EPR paradox, says Nikoli. Had Einstein noticed it, he could have stopped Bohr in his tracks.
That's an interesting historical footnote. Bohr's triumph over Einstein on this occasion is widely thought to have been his greatest.
But now it's easy to see that things could have been significantly different if Einstein had reformulated his argument in terms of entanglement.

http://www.technologyreview.com/view/42 … n-thought/

Spooky Action at Distance': Physicists Develop First Conclusive Test to Better Understand High-Energy Particles Correlations

ScienceDaily (Jan. 16, 2012) — Researchers have devised a proposal for the first conclusive experimental test of a phenomenon known as 'Bell's nonlocality.' This test is designed to reveal correlations that are stronger than any classical correlations, and do so between high-energy particles that do not consist of ordinary matter and light. These results are relevant to the so-called 'CP violation' principle, which is used to explain the dominance of matter over antimatter.

................Revealing "spooky action at distance" for kaon-antikaon pairs has fundamental implications for our understanding of such particles' correlations and could ultimately allow us to determine whether symmetries in particle physics and manifestations of particles correlations are linked.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 … 112608.htm

http://youtu.be/PHVeyo4W18U

So time as we know it is on our side...date stamped, measured and perceived.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbMWdIjArg0

Shadowself
21st June 2015, 17:57
So time as we know it is an Illusion as we experience it? Made by the time vortex we are sitting in right now...giving us the ability to measure it at the same volatility as the spin measurement in which we sit. Based on what? The movement of spin is based on the stars we gauge to measure the distance of revolution. Thus the date and calendar measurement. Maybe Shi Shen was on to something?

In fact that whole "quote" I posted speaks of measuring time correctly basically.


Since the measurement of time takes place in a gravitational field, the lapse in time during which the box is open must also depend on the box's position.
The uncertainty in position is an additional factor that Einstein had not taken into account, and this, according to Bohr, resolved the paradox. Einstein was sent packing.
Of course, this is not a very satisfactory answer to the modern eye. It implies, for one thing, that quantum mechanics requires general relativity to be consistent, an idea that modern physicists would roundly reject.

Nikoli says this problem has never been satisfactorily analyzed from a modern perspective. Until now.

He says the proper resolution is to think of the total energy of the system, which is the energy of the box and the energy of the photon. The total energy is constant and governed by a single mathematical entity, even after the photon is emitted.

So the box and the photon must be entangled.
This immediately raises the problem that Einstein later hit on in the EPR paradox. A measurement on the box immediately influences the photon and vice versa--spooky action at a distance.
For this reason, the photon paradox is equivalent to the EPR paradox, says Nikoli. Had Einstein noticed it, he could have stopped Bohr in his tracks.
That's an interesting historical footnote. Bohr's triumph over Einstein on this occasion is widely thought to have been his greatest.
But now it's easy to see that things could have been significantly different if Einstein had reformulated his argument in terms of entanglement.

So what's a photon?


A photon is an elementary particle, the quantum of light and all other forms of electromagnetic radiation, and the force carrier for the electromagnetic force, even when static via virtual photons. The effects of this force are easily observable at both the microscopic and macroscopic level, because the photon has zero rest mass; this allows long distance interactions. Like all elementary particles, photons are currently best explained by quantum mechanics and exhibit wave–particle duality, exhibiting properties of both waves and particles. For example, a single photon may be refracted by a lens or exhibit wave interference with itself, but also act as a particle giving a definite result when its position is measured.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon

Shadowself
21st June 2015, 18:01
Well, it seems time is being measured now based on particle physics, quantum theory and the like.

Then along comes String theory... first studied in the late 1960s. Many theoretical physicists believe that string theory is a step towards the correct fundamental description of nature. The theory allows for a combination of quantum field theory and general relativity, agrees with general insights in quantum gravity such as the holographic principle and black hole thermodynamics, and because it has passed many non-trivial checks of its internal consistency.

One of the basics of String Theory is SUSY or supersymmetry.

Supersymmetry is a proposed extension of spacetime symmetry that relates two basic classes of elementary particles: bosons, which have an integer-valued spin, and fermions, which have a half-integer spin.

In 1969, Yoichiro Nambu, Holger Bech Nielsen, and Leonard Susskind recognized that the e given a description in space and time in terms of strings. The scattering amplitudes were derived systematically from the action principle by Peter Goddard, Jeffrey Goldstone, Claudio Rebbi, and Charles Thorn, giving a space-time picture to the vertex operators introduced by Veneziano and Fubini and a geometrical interpretation to the Virasoro conditions.

For string theory to be consistent, supersymmetry appears to be required at some level (although it may be a strongly broken symmetry). In particle theory, supersymmetry is recognized as a way to stabilize the hierarchy between the unification scale and the electroweak scale (or the Higgs boson mass), and can also provide a natural dark matter candidate. String theory also requires extra spatial dimensions which have to be compactified as in Kaluza-Klein theory.

Then go back to this post on Type I codes are binary self-dual codes which are not doubly even.

http://i57.tinypic.com/25s7upc.jpg


Did I find what looks very much like a Type I binary self-dual code which is not doubly even in an Egyptian Glyph?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NqmtCrgpeik&feature=youtu.be

Shadowself
21st June 2015, 18:13
Now you're going to have to follow along closely and watch some of these videos to get some clues as to where I'm going next.

In the Moscow Papyrus on the things found regarding Egyptian Math was:

calculating the length of a ship's rudder and the other computes the length of a ship's mast given that it is 1/3 + 1/5 of the length of a cedar log originally 30 cubits long


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow_Mathematical_Papyrus

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhind_Mathematical_Papyrus

Along with plenty of geometry.

If your in a boat on an ocean of water...the first thing you would need to steer the boat is a rudder to steer the ship. It causes a sort of "drag" in the water to allow for steering right?

Regarding time:

Matter causes drag...If you want to achieve a particular time factor....you might need to steer it?

Watch this short video by Hawkings (who I will challenge on one account) but is quite correct on the other accounts.

Watch this through it's entirety. What's the last thing he shows which causes time to slow down....DRAG on time.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02tchltLm3c&feature=youtu.be


If you have any kind of GPS this is the current method of measuring time "accurately". Otherwise you're going to get lost:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dS3MkLamhI8&feature=youtu.be


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frDM0uRedK0&feature=youtu.be

Highly Volatilel Cessium ~ Mixed with brackish water ...from...??

Drag... time/set... Caesium Clock... boom!

http://i60.tinypic.com/fvbhpt.jpg

Shadowself
21st June 2015, 18:17
This is the part where I start to challenge Steven Hawking. If you watched the video he and a few other scientists say Traveling "back" in time is probably impossible. Is it?

Here are a few murals in the Abu Simbel of Ramses II Temple. This temple seems to have been kept in pristine condition on the inside. The carved murals within the walls are in beautiful condition:

http://i62.tinypic.com/8ww8kl.jpg

Google it to see the inside carvings there's plenty out there.

For years in my study of Ancient Egyptian I seriously pondered what happened to this one. How is it every carving in the line of carvings on this wall are in great condition except this one. Here it is:

The wall:
http://i61.tinypic.com/v43yv6.jpg

And a better view of the one I'm concerned with:

http://i60.tinypic.com/2vjzkvb.jpg

What has apparently been destroyed between what appears to be Horus and a servant? Note the ones on either side are fine and between them is a table with an "offering".

What offering was destroyed by time or man that is no longer visible?

Shadowself
21st June 2015, 18:23
So what have I put up here so far? Well Dr James Gates finds Browser Computer code written in the fabric of the cosmos according to the math behind SUSY. Stephen Hawking claims you probably can't travel back in time but with a little ingenuity you might be able to travel to the future. Mr Hawking also stated in his video that being near something as large as the Great Pyramid... time is variant and different.

I've proposed that placing these large Pyramid structure in strategic placement on any given planet using the precise measurements of an atomic clock using Caesium which is volatile and may have contributed to the explosion in the Kings Chamber while creating a rudder like effect to steer the time vortex we're sitting in to a precise measurement to allow time to be what we measure it today.

Pretty far out if you ask me! Pretty crazy....is it crazy enough to be true?

The observer effect in Physics (not to be confused with the Uncertainty Principal) plays a key roll in Quantum mechanics.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observer_effect_%28physics%29


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle

It can all be a trite confusing if you're not a physicist. But what if you could travel back to the past? What if you could travel back and to avoid causing the Paradox left evolutionary clues to keys to the future so you could indeed prove that travel to the past is more than possible in the future?

Well Mr. Scranton in the above video has already detected string theory in Egyptian Symbols.After seeing that , I discovered Dual error correcting code in the glyph of Osiris. It's pretty evident once you understand the concepts.

Having spent years studying Ancient Egyptian for my own personal reasons and red dots...I started to notice a trend. I've collected and studied lot's of glyphs and symbols. But I didn't see the math until just recently. When I ran into the dual error correcting code.

Are we living in a Matrix? In a computer simulation? Is it written on the walls in Egypt and we just missed it?

Allow me to share Michael S. Schneider as he explains how the Ancient Egyptians (and Chinese) and modern computers multiply and divide:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ih1ZWE3pe9o&feature=youtu.be

In 2008 mathematician and author Michael S. Schneider put together this incredible video illustrating how the mathematics used by Ancient Egyptians is identical to that used in computers today.


Initially we shook our heads in confusion when Schneider said this, but it all becomes very clear as he takes you through the process, simply and elegantly demonstrated on his large notepad.


The Ancient Egyptians figured out how to do multiplication without memorizing times tables, and how to do long division without that horrible half box that was the bane of your early childhood.


We took their tricks and built computers with them. WHOA.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/1 … 97806.html

So they used the same method of dividing and multiplying as a common computer?

So now on to this glyph that was destroyed in the previous post. Most offering tables set up for the after life include bread and some basic necessities for such an after life. But for some reason that glyph was completely obliterated. What do you suppose was there that might be removed in such a primary temple as the one it sits in?

It's a pretty public temple back then and now. So how about the more private places? The places where very few might look and discover something very odd and out of place? I've found something very odd and out of place.

The Observer

Tell us what you've seen in far away forgotten lands...

Shadowself
21st June 2015, 18:37
So the Ancient Egyptians and Chinese used math that is identical to that used in computers today?

Wouldn't they need electricity for a computer? Perhaps some kind of wireless was available?

A different kind of Djed Pillar perhaps?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXZP-ijB9-Y&feature=youtu.be

Holding up what?

http://i59.tinypic.com/2e4yw68.jpg

In order to tap into this wireless of the afterlife they needed some kind of back door to access? A code perhaps?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Back_door

Restricted access!

How about a false door?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_door

Now look at a few of the false doors I've run into:

A picture is worth a thousand words...and these speak volumes!

WHERE IS THE OFFERING?

http://i39.tinypic.com/2mi5it1.jpg



The removal of content in the prior glyph where something is removes is about the same size as what is sitting on the offering table in these two back doors false doors. Does that look like a computer screen to you? It does to me!

You don't see that too often. In fact most of the offering of that particular size are loaves of bread as in this false door. Clearly the offering on this table are loaves of bread:

http://i44.tinypic.com/qy8tc5.jpg

Thing is they didn't have computers back then did they? So what is this representing? A window to the future afterlife?

Noting: On the math end of Ancient Egypt is the Moscow Mathematical Papyrus:

Which is simply coincidence or not? Did you know that;

The Moscow Mathematical Papyrus is an ancient Egyptian mathematical papyrus, ... One of the problems calculates the length of a ship's rudder and the other the volume of a frustum of square pyramid among a few other things.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow_Mat … al_Papyrus

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frustum

easy peasy no? 1...2...3


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=An1-ntyBcz8&feature=youtu.be

Note...I haven't come close to the tomb with the code ....yet. :eyebrows:

Shadowself
21st June 2015, 18:48
It appears that the one being offered whatever was obliterated is

HORUS

Let's say you're one of those scientists who believe time travel to the PAST is possible and, if you traveled to the past you don't want to cause a paradox but you CAN leave clues...Like Anagrams and tons of clues. Clues I believe I just recently found. So I'm far from done here with number six. Exactly the opposite. I'm just beginning.

Anagram:

HORUS ~ HOURS

Time measurement!​

http://i60.tinypic.com/2vjzkvb.jpg

What do you need to measure time?

Observation

http://i42.tinypic.com/166hee8.jpg

http://i39.tinypic.com/1zn4ryw.jpg

F NUMBER

focal ratio, f-ratio, f-stop


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimensionless_number

and
Time codes

Shadowself
21st June 2015, 18:52
Sounds downright insane doesn't it? Perhaps I've lost my marbles but I don't think so. Not yet anyway. If I am.. so is Seth Loyd at MIT Physics.

If you picture the future cosmic horizon as a spherical shell of pure light tens of billions of light years away from us - we are at the exact center of this spherical shell of quantum light and gravity.

(Light beings/light workers anyone?)

Seth Lloyd at MIT physics has shown that this spherical shell of light is a powerful quantum computer with 10^123 (one hundred and twenty three powers of ten) quantum light and gravity BITs of information.

The spherical shell of quantum light and gravity is what?

The material universe of things may well be a 3D HOLOGRAM IMAGE projected backwards in time from THE FUTURE AT THE EDGE OF SPACE AT THE END TIME?

So me being me of course questions this BIG TIME! Say WHAT?!?!?

I'm not the only one questioning this:

Is this life real?

Philosophers and physicists say we might be living in a computer simulation, but how can we tell? And does it matter?

http://aeon.co/magazine/science/can-we-tell-if-reality-is-a-computer-simulation/

Well it matters to me. I want to know how about you?

And whoa! You could be anything in a simulation if you were aware...no?


Last but not least:

New back-from-the-future quantum computer paper from Oxford University, UK

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1401.4933.pdf

Treating Time Travel Quantum Mechanically
John-Mark A. Allen∗
Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford,
Wolfson Building, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QD, UK

"The fact that closed timelike curves (CTCs) are permitted by general relativity raises the question as to how quantum systems behave when time travel to the past occurs. Research into answering this question by utilising the quantum circuit formalism has given rise to two theories: D-CTCs and P-CTCs. In this paper the quantum circuit approach is thoroughly reviewed, and the strengths and shortcomings of D-CTCs and P-CTCs are presented in view of their non-linearity and time travel paradoxes. In particular, the “equivalent circuit model”—which aims to make equivalent predictions to D-CTCs, while avoiding some of the difficulties of the original theory—is shown to contain errors. The discussion of D-CTCs and P-CTCs is used to motivate an analysis of the features one might require of a theory of quantum time travel, following which two overlapping classes of new theories are identified. One such theory, the theory of T-CTCs, is fully developed. The theory of T-CTCs is shown to not have undesirable features—such as time travel paradoxes, the ability to distinguish non-orthogonal states, and the ability to clone or delete arbitrary pure states—that are present with D-CTCs and P-CTCs. The problems with non-linear extensions to quantum mechanics are
discussed in relation to the interpretation of these theories, and the physical motivations of all three theories are discussed and compared.


There are few areas of physics in which one confronts
the idea of time travel to the past. When it is discussed,
time travel is often associated with particular ways of
thinking about quantum mechanics and quantum field
theory. One often hears the view that in quantum teleportation,
for example, the teleported information travels
back in time to the point at which entanglement was
created, before proceeding forward in time to the recipient
[37, 38, 47, 57]. Another example might be remarks
about antiparticles in quantum field theory being akin to
particles “travelling backwards in time”. The time travel
considered in this work is rather different. Here it is assumed
that time travel into the past is a possible physical
process, and the question is asked: how must quantum
mechanics be modified to account for time travel? The
motivation for this comes not from within quantum theory
itself, but rather from general relativity and the existence
of spacetime solutions containing closed timelike
curves (CTCs).

CTCs are paths through exotic spacetimes along
which massive particles may travel, apparently forwards
through time, only to return to their own past. As such
they represent a mechanism for time travel to the past.

The discovery that the Einstein field equations of general
relativity permit spacetime solutions that contain CTCs
[14, 29, 30] came as something of a surprise [25]. Many
believe that such spacetimes containing CTCs should not
occur in nature [32, 43], however there is no consensus on
the possibility of precluding such solutions. Spacetimes
containing CTCs are globally non-hyperbolic and therefore
are incompatible with standard relativistic quantum
field theory [12]. Such spacetimes typically contain no
Cauchy surfaces [59] and so the initial value problem is
not well defined, making the analysis of matter in such
spacetimes tricky.

Such issues surrounding theories of time travel in
quantum circuits are subtle, and different theories give
different perspectives. As well as containing undesirable
features, both D-CTCs and P-CTCs are more difficult to
interpret than standard quantum mechanics. Since they
are constructed from the abstract quantum circuit formalism,
any interpretational assumptions behind them are
unclear. One may therefore ask, could there be a theory
with fewer undesirable features? Could such a theory
have a more robust physical motivation?"

There's more...a whole lot more

Red Dots

Shadowself
21st June 2015, 18:58
So, are we a simulation from the future? Is that even possible? I mean we have a physical presence. We interact with matter. How is it possible for a computer simulation to interact with matter? Are we some physical embodiment of digital information & computation developed from the future?

Did you read the the article here?

http://aeon.co/magazine/science/can-we-tell-if-reality-is-a-computer-simulation/

I would recommend it. About a year ago I discovered the possibility that this calendar the Mayans developed was due to expire in 2012 due to evolutionary development in mankind. In fact I found a bio-computing DNA COMPUTER called MAYA II

Which stands for Micro Array of Yes And Not ....First letter of each word:

MAYAN to be exact.

~

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MAYA-II

Now it may not sound like much...a DNA computer playing tic tac toe. However it's a huge step in synthetic biology as a valuable approach to biological engineering.

http://www.nextnature.net/2009/10/computer-versus-bacteria/

So what; if any revolutionary developments might have been developed in 2012 that would mark a new era for something as complex as a DNA computer? Well here's one:

In 2012 MIT labs came out with:
Tangible Media Group, led by
Professor Hiroshi Ishii, explores the
Tangible Bits vision to seamlessly
couple the dual world of bits and
atoms by giving physical form
to digital information.

Tangible User Interface (TUI) that is based on physical embodiment of digital information & computation, in order to go beyond the current dominant paradigm of “Painted Bits” or Graphical User Interface (GUI). Humans have evolved a heightened ability to sense and manipulate the physical world, yet the GUI based on intangible pixels takes little advantage of this capacity. The TUI builds upon our dexterity by embodying digital information in physical space. TUIs expand the affordances of physical objects, surfaces, and spaces so they can support direct engagement with the digital world.

Through the design of a variety of TUIs, however, we have learned that TUIs are limited by the rigidity of “atoms” in comparison with the fluidity of “bits”. TUIs have limited ability to change the form or properties of physical objects in real time. This constraint can make the physical state of TUIs inconsistent with the underlying digital models.

To address this challenge, we presented our new vision, "Radical Atoms", in 2012. Radical Atoms takes a leap beyond Tangible Bits by assuming a hypothetical generation of materials that can change form and appearance dynamically, becoming as reconfigurable as pixels on a screen.
Radical Atoms is a computationally transformable and reconfigurable material that is bidirectionally coupled with an underlying digital model (bits) so that dynamic changes of physical form can be reflected in digital states in real time, and vice versa. ​
Radical Atoms is the future material that can transform their shape, conform to constraints, and inform the users of their affordances. Radical Atoms is a vision for the future of human-material interaction, in which all digital information has a physical manifestation so that we can interact directly with it. We no longer think of designing the interface, but rather of the interface itself as material. We may call it “Material User Interface (MUI).”

http://tangible.media.mit.edu/vision/

Here is one interaction design they have come up with awhile ago:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouP9xNujkNo&feature=youtu.be

This looks rather bulky now...but what about the future? The FAR future?


“all digital information has physical manifestation … as if the iceberg had risen from the depths to reveal its sunken mass.”

Shadowself
21st June 2015, 19:03
In an earlier post I said this is the part where I challenged Stephen Hawking. Well to be fair I'm far from the first person to do so.

The Black Hole Wars;

The Thorne–Hawking–Preskill bet was a public bet on the outcome of the black hole information paradox made in 1997 by physics theorists Kip Thorne and Stephen Hawking on the one side, and John Preskill on the other.

Thorne and Hawking argued that since general relativity made it impossible for black holes to radiate, and lose information, the mass-energy and information carried by Hawking radiation must be "new", and must not originate from inside the black hole event horizon. Since this contradicted the idea under quantum mechanics of microcausality, quantum mechanics would need to be rewritten. Preskill argued the opposite, that since quantum mechanics suggests that the information emitted by a black hole relates to information that fell in at an earlier time, the view of black holes given by general relativity must be modified in some way. The winner of the bet would receive an encyclopedia of the winners's choice.

In 2004, Hawking announced that he was conceding the bet, and that he now believed that black hole horizons should fluctuate and leak information, in doing so providing Preskill with a copy of Total Baseball, The Ultimate Baseball Encyclopedia. Comparing the useless information obtainable from a black hole to "burning an encyclopedia", Hawking later joked, "I gave John an encyclopedia of baseball, but maybe I should just have given him the ashes." Thorne, however, remained unconvinced of Hawking's proof and declined to contribute to the award. As of 2008, Hawking's argument that he has solved the paradox has not yet been accepted by the community, and a consensus has not yet been reached that Hawking has provided a strong enough argument that this is in fact what happens.

Hawking had earlier speculated that the singularity at the centre of a black hole could form a bridge to a "baby universe", into which the lost information could pass; such theories have been very popular in science fiction. But according to Hawking's new idea, presented at the 17th International Conference on General Relativity and Gravitation, on 21 July 2004 in Dublin, black holes eventually transmit, in a garbled form, information about all matter they swallow:

The Euclidean path integral over all topologically trivial metrics can be done by time slicing and so is unitary when analytically continued to the Lorentzian. On the other hand, the path integral over all topologically non-trivial metrics is asymptotically independent of the initial state. Thus the total path integral is unitary and information is not lost in the formation and evaporation of black holes. The way the information gets out seems to be that a true event horizon never forms, just an apparent horizon.

Earlier Thorne–Hawking bet

Another older bet – about the existence of black holes – was described by Hawking as an "insurance policy" of sorts:

This was a form of insurance policy for me. I have done a lot of work on black holes, and it would all be wasted if it turned out that black holes do not exist. But in that case, I would have the consolation of winning my bet, which would win me four years of the magazine Private Eye. If black holes do exist, Kip will get one year of Penthouse. When we made the bet in 1975, we were 80% certain that Cygnus was a black hole. By now, I would say that we are about 95% certain, but the bet has yet to be settled.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thorne%E2%80%93Hawking%E2%80%93Preskill_bet

But this brings us back to time and time travel through Kip Thorne.

Quote:
Wormholes and time travel

Thorne was one of the first people to conduct scientific research on whether the laws of physics permit space and time to be multiply connected (can there exist classical, traversable wormholes and "time machines"?). With Sung-Won Kim, Thorne identified a universal physical mechanism (the explosive growth of vacuum polarization of quantum fields), that may always prevent spacetime from developing closed timelike curves (i.e., prevent "backward time travel"). With Mike Morris and Ulvi Yurtsever he showed that traversable Lorentzian wormholes can exist in the structure of spacetime only if they are threaded by quantum fields in quantum states that violate the averaged null energy condition (i.e. have negative renormalized energy spread over a sufficiently large region). This has triggered research to explore the ability of quantum fields to possess such extended negative energy. Recent calculations by Thorne indicate that simple masses passing through traversable wormholes could never engender paradoxes – there are no initial conditions that lead to paradox once time travel is introduced. If his results can be generalised, they would suggest that none of the supposed paradoxes formulated in time travel stories can actually be formulated at a precise physical level: that is, that any situation in a time travel story turns out to permit many consistent solutions.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kip_Thorne


Out of this black hole war came the Holographic Principle

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holographic_principle

Leonard Susskind refined this and the black hole information paradox by writing a book which has been challenged once again

Here's the lecture and challenge


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KR3Msi1YeXQ&feature=youtu.be

It all seems to lead to that unbelievable conclusion;

Simulated reality
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulated_reality

Recently Jack Sarfatti writes:

John Brockman in Edge asks "What scientific idea is ready for retirement?" My answer is "unitarity" - conservation of information? Nah!

"There are several objections to the firewall proposal. First, if the firewall were located at the event horizon, the position of the event horizon is not locally determined but is a function of the future of the spacetime.” Hawking
Hawking jumps through hoops to try to avoid back-from-the-future CTC computation type destiny effects and non-unitarity.
His cure is worse than the disease in my opinion.

Violate unitarity, violate CPT, violate no-signaling. It’s time for a real revolution in physics and it’s time to come out of Plato’s dark cave of “orthodox” quantum theory. Sure, it works well for dead matter in particle beams, but it does not work for emergent collective modes of high complexity, i.e. us.
Orthodox quantum theory is simply a limiting case of a non-linear non-unitary post-quantum theory with entanglement signal nonlocality without which conscious life is impossible in my opinion.

Information Preservation and Weather Forecasting for Black Holes
S. W. Hawking1
1DAMTP, University of Cambridge, UK
Abstract
It has been suggested [1] that the resolution of the information paradox for evaporating black holes is that the holes are surrounded by firewalls, bolts of outgoing radiation that would destroy any infalling observer. Such firewalls would break the CPT invariance of quantum gravity and seem to be ruled out on other grounds. A different resolution of the paradox is proposed, namely that gravitational collapse produces apparent horizons but no event horizons behind which information is lost. This proposal is supported by ADS-CFT and is the only resolution of the paradox compatible with CPT. The collapse to form a black hole will in general be chaotic and the dual CFT on the boundary of ADS will be turbulent. Thus, like weather forecasting on Earth, information will
effectively be lost, although there would be no loss of unitarity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CPT_symmetry

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unitarity_%28physics%29

Black Hole Wars indeed...I need more coffee!!

Shadowself
21st June 2015, 19:30
So we're at the tomb now and I'm going to show you were I believe it shows proof of time travel and a whole lot more. (did you ever think I'd get there)

Did Ancient Egyptians know about Black holes? Worm holes?

Number 6 on the scroll was listed:

Peripheral Sensor/Surface

Started with the actual definition of Peripheral: Of, relating to, or situated on the edge or periphery of something.

In the image I've shown the False Door/Back Door, Chaos theory and Time travel.

The peripheral surface of a black hole is an Event Horizon.

If you fall into the black hole you will get crushed.

Egyptian: Second death.

If approached from the inner horizon or the axis of the black hole or the north
pole, the gravitational repulsion of the central singularity slows the entity
down, turning it around, and accelerating it back out through the inner horizon of a
white hole. Put simply, the space axis and time axis exchange places when one crosses
the outer event horizon, and the future becomes an unavoidable place in
time or the crushing singularity. Crossing the inner event horizon, time and space resume their normal axes, making the singularity an avoidable place in space, while allowing access to the past singularity of the white hole. Ultimately, one goes through four horizons

~

Egyptians referred to as the opening of mouths four times. The Opening of the
Mouth ceremony parallels the movement of the Deceased through four horizons.


According to scientific speculations, inside a spinning black hole, the act
of looking backward would allow one to see a white hole or the past singularity.
Since a white hole is a black hole running backward in time, the Negative
Confession of the Book of the Dead describes deities:

"Who come forth backwards".

"He whose Face is behind him who came forth from his hole".

The inner horizon, radiation is blueshifted as it accumulates.

Field of Turquoise and the Blue One, Lake of Turquoise,
traveling with turquoise, Lord of Turquoise, and open door of the blue sky.

Indicates blueshift or the high frequency light associated with
approaching radiation.

In contrast, radiation moving away from the observer appears redshifted.
The Dead King observes:

he who departs is red and smeared

"N" has gone up in the red hour.
(N State described in video below starting at 1:16)

~

According to Holographic principal: All Information about the black hole is stored on the horizon....The peripheral!

Particles living on the horizon boundary describe objects in the interior.


Now here I am reviewing a scroll in a room by a supposed ancient culture with nine universal principals written on it.

If what I have just proposed is correct then this ancient culture must certainly KNOW the landscape of space and time with great detail to know the redshift and blueshift attributes.

Dead Kings escapes the black hole Netherworld associated with
uraei shedding "light by means of their radiance (which cometh) from their mouths"

or uraei pouring fire from their mouths:

The mouths of a wormhole are analogous to the holes at either end of the tube in a 2D plane...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole

a quantum parallel exists between the transformed Deceased and Hawking radiance in the bulk, proposing the existence of large extra dimensions in small black holes.

The Dead King is a horizon dweller: has a
seat in the horizon, and takes possession of the horizon

so that those who are in the horizon may live for this spirit

"My power is in the horizon"

~The Ancient Egyptian Coffin Texts - R.O. Faulkner ~

Peripheral Sensor/Surface

Peripheral: Of, relating to, or situated on the edge or periphery of something.

Redefining the Horizon


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXTGInIbD_Q&feature=youtu.be

Shadowself
21st June 2015, 19:36
This is the tomb. Who's tomb? Where and when?

http://i42.tinypic.com/sooevk.jpg

First my Original "Perception" before I had ANY idea who's tomb this was. All I know is I picked up "Syria" and "War". And I said viewing this image with "indignation":

Har te teht tat saiu maau

Har - means District in Syria

te - means Injustice

teht - leads war

tat- means Other world

Saiu - means guardian, watchman (eye of Ra)

Maau - means district

Meaning:

The injustice in the district of Syria that may lead to wars in other worlds is viewed by the guardian Ra in this district (Egypt). ...by the action of this meeting.

Other worlds?

I actually said that in late 2010, but didn't get it deciphered until late 2011 and wrote about it in 2012. I wrote about it due to the current events in Syria and felt there was a ritualistic connection. Little did I know what the "peripheral" view of this image at the time meant.

To understand this image you really need to know where it is, who's tomb it sits in and what time it was made. There's a whole lot more than a simple "star map" as it's been depicted as. To understand this again requires the history and time it was made. Here's a small video as to who's tomb and where it's located. Whose reign it was made during and such.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RenYQ1Cuz3I&feature=youtu.be

Who's tomb:

Senenmut first enters the historical record on a national level as the "Steward of the God's Wife" (Hatshepsut) and "Steward of the King's Daughter" (Neferure). Some Egyptologists place Senenmut's entry into royal service during the reign of Thutmose I, but it is far more likely that it occurred during either the reign of Thutmose II or while Hatsheput was still regent and not pharaoh. After Hatshepsut was crowned pharaoh, Senenmut was given more prestigious titles and became high steward of the king.

Senenmut supervised the quarrying, transport, and erection of twin obelisks, at the time the tallest in the world, at the entrance to the Temple of Karnak. One still stands today; the other broke in two and toppled centuries ago. Karnak's Red Chapel, or Chapelle Rouge, was intended as a barque shrine and may have originally stood between the two obelisks.
Djeser-Djeseru temple

Senenmut claims to be the chief architect of Hatshepsut's works at Deir el-Bahri.

~

So during the reign of Thutmose II and Hatsheput leading to Thutmose III.


I just looked this up today btw. I wasn;t sure who's tomb it was in. So this makes great sense on one level . I pick up Syria and war during the commission of this image in a tomb during this particular time. You see war with Syria was a BID DEAL during this time.

Thutmose II:

Upon Thutmose's coronation, Kush rebelled, as it had the habit of doing upon the transition of Egyptian kingship. The Nubian state had been completely subjugated by Thutmose I, but some rebels from Khenthennofer rose up, and the Egyptian colonists retreated into a fortress built by Thutmose I. On account of his relative youth at the time, Thutmose II dispatched an army into Nubia rather than leading it himself, but he seems to have easily crushed this revolt with the aid of his father's military generals. An account of the campaign is given by the historian Josephus who refers to it as the Ethiopic War.

Thutmose also seems to have fought against the Shasu Bedouin in the Sinai, in a campaign mentioned by Ahmose Pen-Nekhbet. Although this campaign has been called a minor raid, there is a fragment which was recorded by Kurt Sethe which records a campaign in Upper Retenu, or Syria, which appears to have reached as far as a place called Niy where Thutmose I hunted elephants after returning from crossing the Euphrates. This quite possibly indicates that the raid against the Shasu was only fought en route to Syria

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thutmose_II


Hatshepsut:

The records of Hatshepsut's reign claim that she led military campaigns against several foreign lands including Nubia and Syria.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatshepsut

Thutmose III:

Conquest of Syria...The fifth, sixth, and seventh campaigns of Thutmose III were directed against the Phoenician cities in Syria and against Kadesh on the Orontes. In Thutmose's twenty-ninth year, he began his fifth campaign where he first took an unknown city (the name falls in a lacuna) which had been garrisoned by Tunip. He then moved inland and took the city and territory around Ardata, the town was pillaged and the wheat fields burnt. Unlike previous plundering raids, however, Thutmose III subsequently garrisoned the area known as Djahy, which is probably a reference to southern Syria. This subsequently permitted him to ship supplies and troops between Syria and Egypt...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thutmose_III


Now it's starting to make a whole lot of sense as to why I picked up Syria with indignation in my voice.

But the peripheral view of this image says a whole lot more. This image is a whole lot more than just a star map. I'll show you why.

Shadowself
21st June 2015, 19:40
In this tomb is the False door for Senenmut. In all the false doors I've seen this one is multi-layered

Three to be exact as I can see by the image. Three dimensional door to the underworld.

http://i60.tinypic.com/28i9nvm.jpg

Lucky guy eh?

On a three dog/door night:

Wash away my sorrow, wash away my shame
With the rain in Shambala

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/cosmic_tree/shambhala.html


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmTx9y7ePTg&feature=youtu.be

On the road/Path/Ptah to the
Land of the Gods...

Do you know what particular God of the Nine/Ennead is depicted here?

Do you know what should NOT be there in his tomb?

I do!

How does your light shine in the Halls of Amenti/Shambala?

Whoever made this knew some pretty sophisticated "language" of not simply the past but the present. You might want to tie a pillow to the back of your head before you end up like I did.

I'm going to start from the top on down.

http://i62.tinypic.com/104goxt.jpg

Shadowself
21st June 2015, 20:16
If you look at the image it has plenty of Gods depicted.

From the top on down.

Whoever commissioned this knew some pretty sophisticated theory and science. Not that of the average Ancient Egyptian culture. This to me suggests someone/something had present/future knowledge of some extremely complex theory and data. The language alone speaks volumes. Not simply the 24 hour transition of the measured day and date system either. There's a whole lot more than that here.

Just looking at it you see:

Divided into two sections representing the northern and the southern skies. The southern - upper part shown in the picture above - is decorated with a list of decanal stars, as well as constellations of the southern sky belonging to it like Orion and Sothis (Sopdet). Furthermore, the planets Jupiter, Saturn, Mercury and Venus are shown and associated deities who are traveling in small boats over the sky. Thus, the southern ceiling marks the hours of the night

Decanal Stars are 36 groups of stars (small constellations) which rise consecutively on the horizon throughout each earth rotation. The rising of each decan marked the beginning of a new decanal "hour" of the night for the ancient Egyptians, and they were used as a sidereal star clock beginning by at least the 9th or 10th Dynasty (ca 2100 BCE.)

Because a new decan also appears heliacally every ten days (that is, every ten days, a new decanic star group reappears in the eastern sky at dawn right before the Sun rises, after a period of being obscured by the Sun's light), These predictable heliacal re-appearances by the decans were eventually used by the Egyptians to mark the divisions of their annual solar calendar. Thus the heliacal rising of Sirius marked the annual flooding of the Nile.

Eventually this system led to a system of 12 daytime hours and 12 nighttime hours, varying in length according to the season. Later, a system of 24 "equinoctial" hours was used


In the middle you have hieroglyphs which depict the nine flags of the Ennead. The central line which is wider than the other four registers bears together the titles of Hatshepsut and some titles as well as the name of Senenmut. The text reads from the right to the left :

"Live, Horus powerful of kas, Two- Ladies flourishing of years, Horus-of-Gold divine of appearances, king of Upper and Lower Egypt, Maat-ka-Ra, beloved of Amun-Ra, living; the seal bearer of the king of Lower Egypt , the steward of Amun Senenmut, engendered of Ramose (Ra-ms), justified, born of Hatnefret ."

The northern - lower part - shows constellations of the northern sky with the large bear (Ursus major =depicted as a bull with an oval body in which the name is written. The tail ends in 3 circles connected by a line and the 3rd circle is located a the top of a tall triangle) in the center. The other constellations could not be identified. On the right and left of it there are 8 or 4 circles shown and below them several deities each carrying a sun disk towards the center of the picture. The inscriptions associated with the circles mark the original monthly celebrations in the lunar calendar, whereas the deities mark the original days of the lunar month.

4 + 8 = 12 months


Basically measuring time. Well that's the basic explanation given to this image.

But there's more.

Pretty fancy stuff for Senenmut depicting the measurement of time in his tomb.

Notice on his false door the center door is draped with not one but TWO eyes.

Two Eyes/observables

Observer ~ Phisics

Eye of Horus/Time

Eye of Ra/ (to be discussed soon)

In this image in his tomb one particular god stands out above the rest.

In the image your observing Time measurement. Yet I pick up on War with Syria.

Partially expected due to the campaigns run during this reign.

What God of Egypt stands out on the image?

That would be Set

God of the desert, storms, disorder, violence and foreigners.

Set is not, however, a god to be ignored or avoided; he has a positive role where he is employed by Ra on his solar boat to repel the serpent of Chaos Apep.

Depicted as:

the Set animal or Typhonic beast. The animal has a curved snout, long, rectangular ears, a forked tail, and canine body; sometimes, Set is depicted as a human with only the head of the Set animal.

It does not resemble any known creature, although it could be seen as a composite of an aardvark, a donkey, a jackal, or a fennec fox.

~

A Chimera

~

He was also identified with the hippopotamus, crocodiles, scorpions, turtles, pigs.

Now view the image again:

http://i42.tinypic.com/sooevk.jpg

This should not be here!

http://i62.tinypic.com/2s8p73r.jpg

During this time and reign....Turtles were not allowed in Tombs!

Two OBSERVABLE turtles on the top. Yes I know there is a tortoise constellation, but here you have TWO.

Two observable things in this image come out. Especially if you know a thing or two about Chaos theory.

Turtle is depicted as Set/God of Chaos

Below:
The line of gods center to the triangle beaming above. The two gods closest are one a crocodile/man on one side. On the other side a man and a crocodile....Again Depicting Chaos/God Set

The gods are facing toward the triangle in what looks like they could be getting ready to do a tug of war game.

http://i60.tinypic.com/svi70h.jpg

But these Egyptian Gods are not play an ordinary game of Tug of War.

No, they played this tug of war in:

Chimera States born from Chaos theory.

http://i61.tinypic.com/21aimty.jpg

In part measuring metronome swings/time and chaos theory.

states in which synchronisation and desynchronisation co-exist

http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0908/0908.3881.pdf

Researchers report the first purely physical experimental evidence that an invisible and chaotic tug-of-war known as a chimera state can occur naturally within any process that relies on spontaneous synchronization, including clock pendulums, power grids and heart valves.

Chimera States are REAL:

Princeton university

Chimera states can occur in simple systems that have not been explicitly designed to find them—is an important one,” Abrams says. “Before this work, the only experimental examples of chimera states were in fairly complicated systems with computers in the loop. Here the authors have constructed an extremely simple mechanical system that shows a chimera state.”

http://www.futurity.org/chimera-states-are-realand-may-affect-the-power-grid/

~

Chaos theory?

Did you know the catalyst for the development of chaos theory was the electronic computer?

If you get a simple calculator and do some basic multiplication/division/addition the circles in the image will result in some interesting figures.

Particularly; 32 bit vs 64 bit.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/64-bit_computing

Did you know:

Three-body problem / Three door observable Chaotic planetary motion observation:

http://levigilant.com/Bulfinch_Mythology/bulfinch.englishatheist.org/creation/ChaosThreory.html


Researchers refer to these states as chimera states, alluding to the monster from Greek mythology of the same name. The chimera unites incongruent parts: it has a lion's head, a goat's head, and a serpent's tail. In the world of oscillations, this means the coexistence of the incongruent states of synchrony and asynchrony.



Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2013-06-broken-symphony-metronomes.html#jCp


Time Dependent/Dilation

"chaos" means "a state of disorder"

Set is a god of disorder.

How do you repel the serpent god of Chaos Apep?

In the world of oscillations, this means the coexistence of the incongruent states of synchrony and asynchrony.

~

Now is all the really depicted in this Tomb? How could current Chaos theory be depicted in an Ancient Egyptina tomb? And where's the code? You'll see.

Shadowself
21st June 2015, 20:55
Now for a moment let's go back to some number in those circles on the bottom Then we'll get to the stars and planets on the top...and the one that is missing.


Let me do the math for you quickly

http://i60.tinypic.com/27zhnns.jpg


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/64-bit_computing#32-bit_vs_64-bit

33

now that's an interesting number



http://www.greatdreams.com/darkness/cooper-33-degree-flag.jpg

Order from Chaos

3 + 3 = 6

Six degrees of separation

96 + 192 = 288

Divided by 6 = 48

Chaos Control

As I added earlier:

432 divided by 9 =

48

9x9= 81

81 - 48 = 33

~

46 + 2 = 48

42 + 6 = 48

6 degrees of separation...

42

Messier object M42 = Orion Nebula

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orion_Nebula

There are 42 principles of Ma'at, the Ancient Egyptian personification of physical and moral law, order, and truth. In the judgment scene described in the Egyptian and the Book of the Coming/Going Forth by Day (the Book of the Dead (which evolved from the Coffin Texts and the Pyramid Texts), there are 42 gods and goddesses of Egypt, personifying the principles of Ma'at.

42 Negative Confessions (Papyrus of Ani)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maat

~

42 is the number with which God creates the Universe in Kabbalistic tradition. In Kabbalah, the most significant name is that of the En Sof (also known as "Ein Sof", "Infinite" or "Endless")

~

Magic numbers used by programmers:


The glyph, or character, corresponding to the number 42 in the ASCII character set, is *, the asterisk, commonly known as the wildcard character.

In the TIFF image file format, the second 16-bit word of every file is 42, which is used together with the first word to indicate byte order.

In the reiser4 file system, 42 is the inode number of the root directory.

In the military IRIG 106 Chapter 10 data recording standard, the hex value 0x464F52545974776F (ASCII "FORTYtwo") is used as a magic number to identify directory blocks.

The GNU C Library, a set of standard routines available for use in computer programming, contains a function—memfrob()—which performs an XOR combination of a given variable and the binary pattern 00101010 (42) as an XOR cipher.

42 is the result given by the web search engines Google and Wolfram Alpha when the query "the answer to life the universe and everything" is entered as a search.

Tiling a plane using regular hexagons, which is honeycomb in appearance, is approximated in a topological sense to an accuracy of better than 1% using a stretcher bond brick pattern with bricks of 42 squares (6 by 7).

The password expiration policy for a Microsoft Windows domain defaults to 42 days.

In Judaism, the number (in the Babylonian Talmud, compiled 375 AD to 499 AD) of the "Forty-Two Lettered Name" ascribed to God. Rab (or Rabhs), a 3rd-century source in the Talmud stated "The Forty-Two Lettered Name is entrusted only to him who is pious, meek, middle-aged, free from bad temper, sober, and not insistent on his rights". [Source: Talmud Kidduschin 71a, Translated by Rabbi Dr. I. Epstein]. Maimonides felt that the original Talmudic Forty-Two Lettered Name was perhaps composed of several combined divine names [Maimonides "Moreh"]. The apparently unpronouncable Tetragrammaton provides the backdrop from the Twelve-Lettered Name and the Forty-Two Lettered Name of the Talmud.[citation needed]

The Gutenberg Bible is also known as the "42-line Bible", as the book contained 42 lines per page.

The Forty-Two Articles (1552), largely the work of Thomas Cranmer, were intended to summarize Anglican doctrine, as it now existed under the reign of Edward VI.

Sutra of Forty-two Chapters

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sutra_of_Forty-two_Chapters

http://ia700402.us.archive.org/27/items/SutraOfForty-twoSections/SutraOfForty-twoSections.pdf


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OufK0647p1U&feature=youtu.be

Historical note:

1954 before the human diploid number was confirmed as 46. Chimpanzees (the closest living relatives to modern humans) have 48 chromosomes (as well as the other great apes: in humans two chromosomes fused to form chromosome 2).

Chromosome 2 presents very strong evidence in favour of the common descent of humans and other apes. According to researcher J. W. IJdo, "We conclude that the locus cloned in cosmids c8.1 and c29B is the relic of an ancient telomere-telomere fusion and marks the point at which two ancestral ape chromosomes fused to give rise to human chromosome 2.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromosome_2_%28human%29

46 + 2 = 48

Cioncidence? Lets see....

Shadowself
21st June 2015, 21:05
6 degrees of separation:

6 x 32 = 192

~

Bifurcation

the point at which bifurcating occurs... the act of bifurcating : the state of being bifurcated

bifurcate: to cause to divide into two branches or parts

Bifurcation theory & Chaos

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bifurcation_theory

In a dynamical system, a bifurcation is a period doubling, quadrupling, etc., that accompanies the onset of chaos.

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Bifurcation.html

http://i61.tinypic.com/5belo7.jpg

384 = 192 + 192

The primary split of the holistic parameter 384 into two 192’s represents a bifurcation or — more accurately —a polarization of the system into two complementary but polar-opposite sets of elements. For the case of sacred geometries, it divides into two halves that are either mirror images of each other or related by spatial inversion.

~
What about the 64 notation:

192 divided by 64 (bits) =3


In the beginning we were one:

Vesica Piscis (1)

http://i61.tinypic.com/mvrbbl.jpg

bifurcation

But things changed. We began to think we were separate from each other (2)

http://i59.tinypic.com/15zsd4h.jpg

The ultimate goal:

All in one (3)

64 grid tetrahedron ~ Better known and the Flower of life...Imprinted in Egypt

http://i58.tinypic.com/33nw7c4.jpg

64 hexagrams of the I Ching table comprise 192 (Yang) lines and 192 (Yin) broken lines

http://i60.tinypic.com/azdli9.jpg

http://i60.tinypic.com/azdli9.jpg

Now...Do you see the pattern in Chaos within the image I posted from the tomb and the Chimera state as depicted?


Not yet? hold on....

http://i44.tinypic.com/2edqhlg.jpg

Shadowself
21st June 2015, 21:11
"THE FUTURE CREATES THE PRESENT AGAINST THE BACKDROP OF THE PAST"

What else do you see here?

http://i42.tinypic.com/sooevk.jpg

It never occurred to me in my search for the Red Dot; that would be exactly what I needed to pay attention to.

Remember I said in another post there are two Eyes. Two messages here in the encryption.

I turn your attention to the dual message in this tomb to the Red Dots.

Look closely at the bottom portion.

There are seven gods on one side and six on the other with RED DOTS. In between is a tall inverted "V", similar to a pyramid top pointing to a red star the eye of Eye of Taurus the red star (DOT) Aldebaran.

on the bottom are circles; four on one side eight on the other side.

4 + 8 = 12

or represents

48

Take your pick!

Atop the heads of the gods; Red Dots!

7 (gods) + 6 (gods) = 13

or represents

76

This image has been represented at a star map no? Surrounded by stars in fact.

Did you know:

4 + 8 = 12

12 + 76 = 88

12 Signs of the Zodiac Plus 76 = 88 constellations

~

How can that be?

~

Date of the tomb is 18th dynasty; Roughly 1513–1499 BC

Did you know 88 constellations were not mapped and made official until 1922, when the International Astronomical Union (IAU) adopted the modern list of 88 constellations?

At its first meeting in 1922, the International Astronomical Union (IAU), astronomy's governing body which is responsible, among other things, for assigning names to celestial objects and features on those objects, officially adopted the list of 88 constellations that we use today. Definitive boundaries between constellations, which extend out beyond the star figures, were set in 1930, so that every star, nebula, or galaxy, no matter how faint, now lies within the limits of one constellation. For today's astronomer, constellations refer not so much to the patterns of stars, but to precisely defined areas of the sky.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/88_modern_constellations

Are you familiar with " The 48 Main Constellations" ?

http://i60.tinypic.com/1pjfvl.jpg

http://i58.tinypic.com/23thw88.jpg

by Claudius Ptolemy

BORN: AD 90

Who wrote the Almagest and listed the 48 Main Constellation long AFTER this 18 dynasty image in a tomb.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ptolemy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almagest

~

12 zodiac constellations plus 76 = 88 constellations!

This being is depicted in an 18th dynasty star chart? Nah couldn't be!

So where does 13 come into play?

how about the 13th (ambiguous) sign of the zodiac?

Ophiuchus ~ The Serpent-Bearer included in the 88 MODERN constellation count!


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/88_modern_constellations

http://www.physics.csbsju.edu/astro/asp/constellations2.html

Ophiuchus is one of thirteen constellations that cross the ecliptic. It has therefore been called the '13th sign of the zodiac'.

Which didn't come about (confusion between the notion of a sign and constellation) until 1970

Ophiuchus is one of thirteen constellations that cross the ecliptic. It has therefore been called the '13th sign of the zodiac'.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ophiuchus_%28astrology%29

How could all this be in an Ancient Egyptian tomb?

Ambiguous? Possibly....but wait there's more....

Shadowself
21st June 2015, 21:30
A cube:

Four sides with a top and a bottom = 6 sides

Hypercube:

In geometry, a hypercube is an n-dimensional analogue of a square (n = 2) and a cube (n = 3). It is a closed, compact, convex figure whose 1-skeleton consists of groups of opposite parallel line segments aligned in each of the space's dimensions, perpendicular to each other and of the same length.


tesseract:

In geometry, the tesseract, also called an 8-cell or regular octachoron or cubic prism, is the four-dimensional analog of the cube; the tesseract is to the cube as the cube is to the square. Just as the surface of the cube consists of 6 square faces, the hypersurface of the tesseract consists of 8 cubical cells. The tesseract is one of the six convex regular 4-polytopes.

Oh look what I see!


A generalization of the cube to dimensions greater than three is called a "hypercube", "n-cube" or "measure polytope"

http://i61.tinypic.com/sdlg03.jpg

Now isn't that the thing found in the middle of the Black hole in the move Interstellar?

But wait...


~

A six cube!

In geometry, a 6-cube is a six-dimensional hypercube with 64 vertices, 192 edges

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/6-cube


~


If you intersect lines from all sides of a cube you would get a single point totaling 6 with a point in the middle. Add another point for a total of seven points. But the cube only has 6 sides...intersecting to make a point in the middle.

Now add an outside point that would be a total of 8

8 X 8 = 64

Oh boy there's that number again!

But let me show you something else

A point of origin and destination:

http://i60.tinypic.com/2lrl15.jpg

And let me show you one other thing:

Look at the inverted long V shape with the Red Dot (Aldebaran)

And look at this:

Check out the "7th" seal!

seven points to outline a course to a position...to find a destination within any three dimensional space, you need six points to determine the exact location...but to chart a course, you need a point of origin...

So, which came first the chicken or the egg? Am I seeing a Hollywood movie made on this or this was made from a Hollywood movie? Because I'm telling you there it sits in an 18th dynasty tomb!

http://i57.tinypic.com/33a3vjc.jpg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypercube

Gamma symbol:

http://www.decodeunicode.org/de/data/glyph/196x196/0263.gif

Flipped around:

http://i57.tinypic.com/33a3vjc.jpg

Gamma/Time Dilation


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlJNsRZ4WxI&feature=share&list=PLcUY9vudNKBNwkTA_1VWz8JeqO8HU15qo&index=2


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGsbBw1I0Rg&feature=share&list=PLcUY9vudNKBNwkTA_1VWz8JeqO8HU15qo&index=1



Squaring the circle

There are three classical problems in Greek mathematics which were extremely influential in the development of geometry. These problems were those of squaring the circle, doubling the cube and trisecting an angle. Although these are closely linked, we choose to examine them in separate articles. The present article studies what has become the most famous for these problems, namely the problem of squaring the circle or the quadrature of the circle as it is sometimes called.

One of the fascinations of this problem is that it has been of interest throughout the whole of the history of mathematics. From the oldest mathematical documents known up to the mathematics of today the problem and related problems concerning π have interested both professional mathematicians and amateur mathematicians.

One of the oldest surviving mathematical writings is the Rhind papyrus, named after the Scottish Egyptologist A Henry Rhind who purchased it in Luxor in 1858. It is a scroll about 6 metres long and 1/3 of a metre wide and was written around 1650 BC by the scribe Ahmes who copied a document which is 200 years older. This gives date for the original papyrus of about 1850 BC but some experts believe that the Rhind papyrus is based on a work going back to 3400 BC.

You can see more about the Rhind papyrus in the History topic article Egyptian papyri.

More here:

http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/history/HistTopics/Squaring_the_circle.html

~

Squaring the Circle

An interesting fact is that it is because π is transcendental that it’s impossible to square the circle, as the ancients had tried so hard to do. This fact became known only in the nineteenth century, when algebraic numbers became well-understood. It so happens that to square the circle, meaning to construct with straightedge and compass a square whose area is the same as that of a given circle, is tantamount to solving an equation with rational coefficients and getting π as the solution. This is impossible because π is transcendental, and therefore not algebraic. There can never be such an equation that would yield π as a solution.

From this:

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/2014/06/06/century-old-math-mystery-solved/#.VYcr5fnYF0z

~

Meton: Ah! These are my special rods for measuring the air. You see, the air is shaped - how shall I put it? - like a sort of extinguisher: so all I have to do is to attach this flexible rod at the upper extremity, take the compasses, insert the point here, and - you see what I mean?

Peisthetaerus: No.

Meton: Well I now apply the straight rod - so - thus squaring the circle: and there you are. In the center you have your market place: straight streets leading into it, from here, from here, from here. Very much the same principle, really, as the rays of a star: the star itself is circular, but sends out straight rays in every direction.

http://i60.tinypic.com/x2o1e9.jpg

Like this:

http://i60.tinypic.com/2lrl15.jpg

Shadowself
21st June 2015, 21:35
On to the code after I take a break..Whew! I hope you got all that....LOL


But I will leave for awhile with this:

Stargate
Making Star Trek Real
Jack Sarfatti
Internet Science Education Project
Foreword

“The future, and the future alone, is the home of explanation.”
Henry Dwight Sedgwick

“Sarfatti's Cave is the name I'll give to the Caffe Trieste in San Francisco, where Jack Sarfatti, Ph.D. in physics, writes his poetry, evokes his mystical, miracle-working ancestors, and has conducted a several-decade-long seminar on the nature of reality … to a rapt succession of espresso scholars. ... It's Jack Sarfatti against the world, and he is indomitable. …One of his soaring theories is that things, which have not happened, yet can cause events in the present. … Cornell University B.A. , University of California Ph.D., his credentials are impeccable. Following is a quotation from a Lecture given to a San Francisco State physics seminar on 30 April 1991:

CAUSALITY VIOLATING QUANTUM ACTION AT A DISTANCE
By Dr. Jack Sarfatti

The universe is created by intelligent design but the Designer lives in our far future and has evolved from us … Perhaps, all the works of cultural genius, from the music of Mozart to the physics of Einstein, have their real origin in the future. The genius may be a real psychic channeler whose mind is open to telepathic messages from the future. The genius must be well trained in his or her craft and intellectually disciplined with the integrity of the warrior in order to properly decode the quantum signals from the future. The purpose of our existence would then be to ensure, not only the creation of life on earth, but also the creation of the big bang itself! We obviously cannot fail since the universe cannot have come into existence without us in this extreme example of Borgesian quantum solipsism [bolstered by John Archibald Wheeler’s “observer-participator” and “the universe as a self-excited circuit]. Existentialism is wrong because it is an incorrect extrapolation of the old physics. Breton’s surrealism, with its Jungian idea of meaningful coincidence, is closer to the truth. This would then be the final secret of the Illuminati – that charismatic chain of adepts in quixotic quest of their ‘Impossible Dream’ of the Grail. Enough of my subjective vision. Now on to the objective physics. Gold, Herbert. Bohemia: Where Art, Angst, Love & Strong Coffee Meet.


Love the last line:

Coffee lust ~ Effect Soul

http://i58.tinypic.com/1zp1tfa.jpg

Cont:

There is now a significant body of results on quantum interactions with closed timelike curves (CTCs) in the quantum information literature, … As a consequence, there is a prima facie argument exploiting entanglement that CTC interactions would enable superluminal and, indeed, effectively instantaneous signaling. …. Using the consistency condition, we show that there is a procedure that allows Alice to signal to Bob in the past via relayed superluminal communications between spacelike-separated Alice and Clio, and spacelike-separated Clio and Bob. This opens the door to time travel paradoxes in the classical domain … offering a possible window on what we might expect in a future theory of quantum gravity. Quantum interactions with closed timelike curves and superluminal signaling, Jeffrey Bub and Allen Stairs, PHYSICAL REVIEW A 89, 022311 (2014)

‘In this case, Bob possesses the unknown state even before Alice implements the teleportation. Causality is not violated because Bob cannot foresee Alice’s measurement result, which is completely random. But, if we could pick out only the proper result, the resulting “projective” teleportation would allow us to travel along spacelike intervals, to escape from black holes, or to travel in time.” Seth Lloyd et-

This is a series of blog essays about teleological destiny, quick time travel to colonize Earthlike exoplanets through stargates, and the possibility that we are three-dimensional hologram images in a virtual reality programmed by a cosmological conscious super-intelligence that is alive and well on our future two-dimensional dark energy edge of space that we can ever hope to see with light signals. My speculative hypothesis-conjecture of this book is that our idea of time and cause and effect is profoundly wrong. In particular the “unproven theorem paradox” of time travel is not a paradox at all.

“The “unproved theorem” paradox points out that if there are CTCs, then it might be possible to take a published proof of a theorem into the past and present it to someone, who then uses it to produce the very manuscript that leads to the theorem’s publication Bub & Stairs op-cit

Evidence on “brain presponse” (Libet, Radin, Bierman, Bem) suggests that our consciousness and creativity are such meme self-creating strange loops. The universe does only not emerge out of the past, but is also pulled toward the future for a purpose. This idea is not new in philosophy, but has reappeared in physics starting with the work of John Archibald Wheeler and Richard Feynman in the 1940s. This back-from-the-future effect is needed to understand the nature of both dark matter and dark energy that is most of the stuff in our accelerating universe and most importantly to understand our own consciousness and how to reach the stars and beyond.

~

If even a small quotient of the above is correct...It's all clear, you were meant to be here!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtGjJVcrKQU&feature=youtu.be


Time travel experiment demonstrates how to avoid the grandfather paradox

http://phys.org/news/2011-03-grandfather-paradox.html

And last until I get to the code, adding this video to that information and how you say...

Quiff Pop?

Listen to what William Henry says in the first part of this video. The rest is pretty interesting as well.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GA-SXN0O74o&feature=youtu.be

http://i57.tinypic.com/21xz0m.jpg

lookbeyond
22nd June 2015, 01:01
Hi Shadowself, i am really interested in your information, but i cant keep up with you!! My Mother was fascinated with Egypt and read Edgar Cayce, i have links in this area myself with dreams and a vision, you have put so much work into this thread however would it b possible to get a paragraph of a summary of this information so that i may see where i am going a little easier? Sometimes it helps me to work backwards, if you understand? :),lb

Shadowself
22nd June 2015, 12:29
Lockbeyond I absolutely will when I get to the cypher and code. Which I didn't have time to do yesterday.

I also had to repair an image on page 3 post number 39. I went rather fast yesterday to get the basics down.

I said in the beginning I would be putting down information and lots of it that relates to what is in the tomb. There is of course more and it resides on the false door within the tomb.

I just ran out of time is all...soon, but probably not today as I have to go to work. I really tried to get it all in yesterday but just no time.

My last post here had some interesting information in it which I'll get into soon and I'll quote what Dr Sarfatti, who worked on the 100 year starship project by the DOD, was and is privately funded in some interesting areas along these lines.

I'll quote from my last post which I also colorized above:

Dr Sarfatti said:..."This is a series of blog essays about teleological destiny, quick time travel to colonize Earthlike exoplanets through stargates, and the possibility that we are three-dimensional hologram images in a virtual reality programmed by a cosmological conscious super-intelligence that is alive and well on our future two-dimensional dark energy edge of space that we can ever hope to see with light signals. My speculative hypothesis-conjecture of this book is that our idea of time and cause and effect is profoundly wrong. In particular the “unproven theorem paradox” of time travel is not a paradox at all.

“The “unproved theorem” paradox points out that if there are CTCs, then it might be possible to take a published proof of a theorem into the past and present it to someone, who then uses it to produce the very manuscript that leads to the theorem’s publication Bub & Stairs op-cit

Note: The tomb of Senemut was discovered during the 1925-1927 excavations

The 48 main constellations were not taken into account until 1922.....

And...So far I've only shown you the bottom half of the image/star map in the tomb.....there's more to come. I just didn't have time.

There are things in that tomb that should not be there for that time period when it was made 18th century dynasty.

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1101.1927v1.pdf

http://i61.tinypic.com/2mfk64l.jpg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-time_pad

lookbeyond
22nd June 2015, 23:31
thanks Shadowself :),lb

lcam88
23rd June 2015, 04:51
What an info dump!

You dwelled on time for a bit: http://www.andersoninstitute.com/time-warped-fields.html

As I when over your posts, much of what I can see are coincidences that exist in what can be called chaos. Put into order by your design, it seems. I cannot discern much from the numerology aspects for example. What is the significance of 33? or the other numbers you point out?

Is there a pointer of some kind that puts this into a context that is more meaningful?

Shadowself
23rd June 2015, 12:20
Thank you for your input Icam88.

Information "dump"?

What I've shown so far is not simply chaos but a Dynamical System...within a star map...in a tomb...So far.


A dynamical system is a concept in mathematics where a fixed rule describes how a point in a geometrical space depends on time. Examples include the mathematical models that describe the swinging of a clock pendulum, the flow of water in a pipe, and the number of fish each springtime in a lake.

At any given time a dynamical system has a state given by a set of real numbers (a vector) that can be represented by a point in an appropriate state space (a geometrical manifold). Small changes in the state of the system create small changes in the numbers. The evolution rule of the dynamical system is a fixed rule that describes what future states follow from the current state. The rule is deterministic; in other words, for a given time interval only one future state follows from the current state.

Understanding the probabilistic aspects of dynamical systems has helped establish the foundations of statistical mechanics and of chaos.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamical_system

What appear to be random numbers are not so random but very precise. But there is more coming. As I said earlier I've not relayed the top portion of the map. How it's mysteries have plagued Egyptology and Astronomers.

Of course I've not come to the interesting part that makes this dynamical system in a Tomb the most interesting either. All in good time.

Dreamtimer
23rd June 2015, 12:39
I was reading about solar calendars and lunar calendars. It takes 33 years for the lunar calendar to cycle back around to the solar calendar. (Hope I said that right)

Shadowself
23rd June 2015, 12:47
I was reading about solar calendars and lunar calendars. It takes 33 years for the lunar calendar to cycle back around to the solar calendar. (Hope I said that right)

Thanks Dreamtimer...also this:

Measuring Nuclear Decay....


Going back to take another look at the decay data from the Brookhaven lab, the researchers found a recurring pattern of 33 days. It was a bit of a surprise, given that most solar observations show a pattern of about 28 days – the rotation rate of the surface of the sun.

The explanation? The core of the sun – where nuclear reactions produce neutrinos – apparently spins more slowly than the surface we see. "It may seem counter-intuitive, but it looks as if the core rotates more slowly than the rest of the sun," Sturrock said.

All of the evidence points toward a conclusion that the sun is "communicating" with radioactive isotopes on Earth, said Fischbach.

Form this post here: http://jandeane81.com/threads/7186-6-Degrees-of-Separation-Order-from-Chaos?p=841929095&viewfull=1#post841929095

lcam88
23rd June 2015, 13:39
Thank you for your input Icam88.

Information "dump"?

Sorry for the layman term. You really posted a lot of information to lay your groundwork. It's been a very interesting read so far but there a few points that I'm either too dumb to understand or just can't make the references very meaningful. I'm sure you know what I mean.




What I've shown so far is not simply chaos but a Dynamical System...within a star map...in a tomb...So far.


Yes indeed. And the reality has so much more too.




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamical_system

What appear to be random numbers are not so random but very precise. But there is more coming. As I said earlier I've not relayed the top portion of the map. How it's mysteries have plagued Egyptology and Astronomers.

Of course I've not come to the interesting part that makes this dynamical system in a Tomb the most interesting either. All in good time.

You have my attention Shadowself, this topic is very interesting indeed, even the information you present in your groundwork, and at some point I hope to be able to post an interesting question, but considering the amount of information you posted, I only have the superficial view of how you associated each aspect. Indeed it seems that you have devoted a good portion of your life to the details you found so far. I'm quite content to examine this information with curiosity though perhaps from that more distant and "emotionally uninvested" viewpoint, for now.

OHhhh yeah, bring _IT_ on! baby!

EDIT: +1 to a link between solar activity and radioactive decay. The half-life is presumed in science to be a constant, and yet people are able to predict solar events based on small variations in the half-life of mildly radioactive elements. I can find the article if you want.

lcam88
24th June 2015, 12:59
This actually belongs here.


I'd like to present a perspective that is yet unlabeled.

If indeed space and time collapsed, there would be no difference between the "here" or the "there", everything is superimposed in a way => the degenerate circle forming a point, or even the current location being everywhere simultaneously => the point superimposed on the circle.

Simultaneous and superimposition.

That same phenomena as with space also applies for time. A complete life of the universe is moment, the instant is eternal etc.

That is the singularity.

Hypothesis 1

The singularity _must_ exist simultaneously to our existence if it exist at all. That paradox gives credence to the idea that time is a manifestation between the realm that is the singularity and our realm. Perhaps space/time partially the result of an electromagnetic type relationship in some field found in a realm where vectors can only have two opposite of directions. (front and back)

Hypothesis 2

That paradox causes an uncertainty about whether it is the same singularity behind every event horizon in the known universe or not. Maybe there is truly one one singularity that exists that the center of every galaxy, the one hidden behind a million veil that we call the event horizons.

Hypothesis 3

The information of the universe cannot reasonably be contended to reside on the peripheral of the event horizon, unless you understand that peripheral to be the entire galaxy (entirely possible). It exists in our reality as we experience it, and mirrored (perhaps if you insist in the law of thermodynamics) in that eternal moment that is a part of the singularity.

Hypothesis 4

Energy moves from the singularity outwards, perhaps through one or more types of fabrics such as space/time, or inwards towards the singularity. The way in which the energy interferes with itself and manifests into the various possible levels of chaos possibilities, we get variation and differentiation of one original design/existence.

Experimentation or Test(s)

As an experiment you can perform tests to validate these hypothesis' I put forward, consider your perceptions. The suggestions are by no means a complete list of possible experiments.

As you move about, how does your perception change? You are always at the center of your perceptions, even as you ride in a car. The extensions of your perceptions are always from a center of consciousness outwards or from the outside towards the center of your mind. Is this at least partial confirmation that at least a part of our experience is of the same pattern as the Singularity?

Perhaps that is a design pattern not only innate to the singularity at the center of the universe, and us, but also dogs, cats, animals of all sorts, perhaps the sun too. And we really don't know enough about subatomic structures or molecules to exclude them from the pattern, right? And if so, hypothetically, as different patterns may emerge or reveal themselves from personal experience become evident to us, is it possible that those patterns also reside in some way around us? In the subatomic realm? In the astronomical realm (if so does this mean astrology may be more interesting to examine)?

I need to reexamine your previous posts in more detail Shadowself...

Shadowself
25th June 2015, 11:44
Like I said before Icam88...no wrong answers here. Your post above was in response to this post:

http://jandeane81.com/threads/7052-Information-dissemination?p=841926976&viewfull=1#post841926976

Which also happens to be on this thread..Imagine that!


As you move about, how does your perception change?

Awareness: "the ability to perceive, to feel, or to be conscious of events, objects, thoughts, emotions, or sensory patterns. In this level of consciousness, sense data can be confirmed by an observer without necessarily implying understanding. More broadly, it is the state or quality of being aware of something. In biological psychology, awareness is defined as a human's or an animal's (dogs, cats, animals of all sorts) perception and cognitive reaction to a condition or event.


...

Changes in awareness

The ability to consciously detect an image when presented at near-threshold stimulus varies across presentations. One factor is "baseline shifts" due to top down attention that modulates ongoing brain activity in sensory cortex areas that affects the neural processing of subsequent perceptual judgments. Such top down biasing can occur through two distinct processes: an attention driven baseline shift in the alpha waves, and a decision bias reflected in gamma waves.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Awareness


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCQ_3qE6SmQ


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_9Ui5WlivA

lcam88
26th June 2015, 12:51
Like I said before Icam88...no wrong answers here. Your post above was in response to this post:

http://jandeane81.com/threads/7052-Information-dissemination?p=841926976&viewfull=1#post841926976

Which also happens to be on this thread..Imagine that!


Indeed! :)




Awareness: "the ability to perceive, to feel, or to be conscious of events, objects, thoughts, emotions, or sensory patterns. In this level of consciousness, sense data can be confirmed by an observer without necessarily implying understanding. More broadly, it is the state or quality of being aware of something. In biological psychology, awareness is defined as a human's or an animal's (dogs, cats, animals of all sorts) perception and cognitive reaction to a condition or event.


Perhaps the biological/animal level of understanding awareness is actually arbitrary to the hypothesis I was forwarding. What matters is actually how our existence is similar to the existence of the singularity in the way energies and perceptions flow insofar as my examination of the issue is addressing.

Furthermore, it is completely appropriate to see patterns that emerges, with regard to these flows as well as many other areas, in all life that we may encounter in our mist. And considering the nature of the subject matter being discussed, I contend it would be appropriate to then extend the essential corresponding meanings found to things we know less about?

Perhaps stars and planets also have a similar type of energetic exchange with their midst. Certainly the persistence of awareness cannot also apply to the astronomical realm, right?

We certainly do not know, however science does not recognize sentience in stars or planets, some of our alternative community believes the planet "Gaia" might, but nobody has certainty. Perhaps this examination can shed light on that, initially from a theosophical viewpoint perhaps as a direction to pursue explanations in other ways. Shrug.



...

Changes in awareness

The ability to consciously detect an image when presented at near-threshold stimulus varies across presentations.

What do you mean by "near-threshold stimulus? By presentation you mean by permitting the image to be detected by sensory input?


One factor is "baseline shifts" due to top down attention that modulates ongoing brain activity in sensory cortex areas that affects the neural processing of subsequent perceptual judgments.

What context to you apply the term "baseline shifts"? do you mean focus of attention or alpha and gamma shift?


Such top down biasing can occur through two distinct processes: an attention driven baseline shift in the alpha waves, and a decision bias reflected in gamma waves.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Awareness


Perhaps it is worth considering, while you have dived down an area of human and animal awareness whose exact functionality [,based on the observation of a mechanics,] is less familiar to me, that there may be other basis' by which awareness can be observed. The physics of awareness you describe are the theoretical mechanics by which humans and animals can be aware of things in their midst and in their realm of reality. Certainly the physics and mechanics for awareness at the cellular level is going to be different in fundamental ways; the realm of reality a cell finds itself immersed in have completely different energetic exchanges from humans and animals. But it is still worth noting that cells and bacteria (singe celled organisms) are considered to be alive.

Diverging slightly, the perception of adaptive type characteristics single celled organisms exhibit create no doubt to us that they can respond to their environment. And because they are "born" (I don't know if cell division is actually a birth, but...) and they die, science has included them in the categorization we refer to as "living". Science and medicine don't go so far as to say cells are aware or sentient though perhaps the question has been posed and perhaps visited in some fashion.

So my questions: is the definition for awareness necessarily bound to the mechanics established for one classification of life [as is established by study of members of the animal kingdom (our own biological classification)]?
1. If not, why is mention of that mechanism required when describing awareness in the more broad sense?
2. If so, it is commonly accepted that plants respond to environmental conditions, there are experiments with music that effect the way plants grow, is that responsive characteristic excluded from the categorization of awareness only because it is not animal like?

One of the base-line assumption I think you are making is best questioned with: Why should the notions of life and awareness necessarily be separated?

I can only think of political reasons that affirmatively answer that separation is necessary. The metaphorical impulse of such political reasoning seems to be for humans to carry a diminished view of themselves... But I digress here yet again with more of my own conclusions.





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCQ_3qE6SmQ


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_9Ui5WlivA

I'm going to watch them through the day today. Comments to follow.

Shadowself
27th June 2015, 14:43
What do you mean by "near-threshold stimulus? By presentation you mean by permitting the image to be detected by sensory input?

What context to you apply the term "baseline shifts"? do you mean focus of attention or alpha and gamma shift?

cortical processing:

Tools in the cerebral cortex which are engaged in cognitive behaviors and responses. Processing visual information. Areas that are neither motor or sensory but are thought to be involved in higher processing of information.

The Moody Blues video I added is FULL of "Visual semiotics from the first page of this thread....So is this photo...

The bridge represents? An Einstein Rosen Bridge?

http://i61.tinypic.com/2mo89hc.jpg

Happy birthday Son! The song says it all...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-bgC1Yip6c

Gemma
28th June 2015, 04:42
I am caught overwhelmed and weeping at your post and sighting of your Son's photo and afraid that I will not adequately find words to be able to convey to you, someone I do not know, how much I feel and admire your quest to never give up ~ I wanted to share that I deeply respect and support your beautiful and profound persistence, determination, and love. Perhaps an emoticon would be the best way for me to say without words, but alas, will pale dreadfully to what I just felt.

Nope, sorry couldn't find one adequate enough either :(:love:

All the best to you Shadowself
Gemma

Shadowself
28th June 2015, 16:42
Hello Gemma,

Thanks for your heartfelt message. Yesterday being his birthday I decided not to post anything besides that.

I must relay to others regardless of the grief I've experienced...I am without a doubt a very bless person. I often wonder what I ever did to deserve it but I have been. Believe me when I tell you I don't take it for granted either. I have another son (my youngest) who simply amazes me every day. What did I do to deserve such a soul for a son? I don't know...but I'm grateful every day and thank my lucky stars! He calls me just to talk. What kids do that? Not many. They're usually too busy to call their mothers. But he does..and we laugh and talk for hours sometimes. He'll call me just to tell me how he just pruned his broccoli plant from his garden. He'll call me to tell me about his latest girl friend or newest job adventure.

Like I said I don't know what I ever did to deserve to be so blessed but I am truly....

On that note I'm also in some bad shape as as far as my hand goes and I'm going to have no choice but to slow down the posting as it's quite painful. My doctor just put me in another type of cast and it's pretty hard to type as well.

I'm not stopping ....It's just going to slow down from here. But believe me when I tell you what I'm going to share from here on out will be quite interesting. What I've done so far is lay out the ground work...the validating information that makes it far more than just guess work.

Intrigued yet? You'll see...

http://i42.tinypic.com/2afhmhd.jpg

Stars...Black holes and revelations....


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7QsZPYJ-n4&list=FL_ykjY3_7A8F_vL1uYLo-iw&index=26

Shadowself
29th June 2015, 15:28
The significance of the top portion of the image/star map is quite interesting. It's also been a big controversy between Egyptology and Astronomers. There is something quite unique that they have been trying to determine.

http://i59.tinypic.com/6qcod2.jpg

In particular....this:

The empty boat represents Mars

http://i60.tinypic.com/2nbttsk.jpg

So why is it empty? Many would presume it's because this would indicate a particular alignment and view of the night sky. Being that Mars is not visible....so when might this be? And what exactly is the significance? Particularly since Aldebaran is a Key star in the bottom portion:

http://i58.tinypic.com/e9yq2o.jpg

This is most likely showing a particular alignment and time.....but when?

Think on that for awhile and I'll be back soon to show you what I discovered.

Rocket's Mom
2nd July 2015, 01:38
Shadowself:
What a beautiful picture of your son! The song was wonderful -- sending you Peace and Joy!

Shadowself
4th July 2015, 16:53
So...Good morning!

I will try my best to post as long as my hand holds out. So bare with me as I attempt to show you some interesting dates and some interesting qualities about a certain planet discovered.

Now during my search for this code I stopped for a time when I was sidetracked by a group working on some kind of Pyramid that was alleged to be built in Russia. This pyramid was also in some way connected to the work at CERN. It was also said that the top of this pyramid was a crystal. That there were "measurements" and alignments involved with the building of this pyramid.

I was also told a date that might be the testing of this pyramid. I will be sharing that date here soon. Because this particular date also had great importance to developing calendars for measuring days and time etc.

~

So first of all...this image in the tomb is quite interesting and has been worked on for quite some time to determine when exactly this might be. When this alignment of stars and constellations might have occurred.

First I'm going to leave you with a paper written by one who has studied this map and the Abstract:

http://i57.tinypic.com/2hi0br5.jpg

Link...(happy reading):

https://www.academia.edu/4993866/The_astronomical_ceiling_of_senenmut_a_dream_of_my stery_and_imagination

Shadowself
4th July 2015, 17:14
So...here is a view where Mars would not be in view of the northern hemisphere but clearly Aldebaran would be. It's also an interesting date which I will be sharing here soon.

http://i58.tinypic.com/apcxgo.jpg

I also at this time would like you to note the vicinity of Jupiter.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QO27Wjl8e9c

This freaky fluid as NASA calls it is:

A Freaky Fluid inside Jupiter?

"Liquid metallic hydrogen has low viscosity, like water, and it's a good electrical and thermal conductor,"

Makes for one gigantic generator!

It's important to understand this behemoth because it wielded a lot of influence in the solar system's formation. After the sun took shape out of the solar nebula, Jupiter formed from the majority of leftover material. The state and composition of the material remaining just after the sun formed are preserved in Jupiter.

"It holds the heirloom recipe that made our solar system's first planets," says Bolton. "And we want it."

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2011/09aug_juno3/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallic_hydrogen

Shadowself
4th July 2015, 17:36
Speculation: Is Jupiter the Eye of Horus?

O Osiris the King, the gods have knit together your face for you and Horus has given you his Eye, that you may see with it.

http://i59.tinypic.com/2wd9ixd.jpg

Speculation here: http://home.hiwaay.net/~jalison/bowles.html

http://home.hiwaay.net/~jalison/bowles2.html

Well? ....lets see....

Shadowself
4th July 2015, 18:01
There has been a whole lot of speculation as to what exactly they are doing there at the CERN Location which is located in Switzerland of course.

In the circles I've investigated there is this one I noted last year. His name is John Walker from Fourmilab. Allow me to share with you a twitter note:

http://i58.tinypic.com/vcykgk.jpg

This would indicate radiation:

On one of his trips to CERN he realates this:

..."While nobody is allowed in the accelerator tunnels and detector halls while the machine is running (for the excellent reason that the radiation and magnetic field would quickly kill them), during the stand-down the environment is benign and, if you know somebody, it is possible to visit these magnificent machines".

http://www.fourmilab.ch/images/CERN_2013/

http://www.fourmilab.ch/nav/topics/map.html

http://www.fourmilab.ch/

What is emitted from a black hole according to Stephen Hawking and coincidentally named after him?

Hawking radiation.

So is it true the rumors that CERN might be causing and making tiny black holes? Might they be working on creating a stable worm hole? Or studying such in the offing of particle acceleration? Something to certainly think about....


Noting John Walker is a computer programmer with a wide variety of interests:



http://www.fourmilab.ch/nav/topics/map.html

A trip to CERN and the South Pole in 2013 among others...

http://www.fourmilab.ch/images/antarctica_2013/

http://www.fourmilab.ch/images/CERN_2013/

Shadowself
4th July 2015, 18:49
Cosmic accelerators

Black holes are well known for their ability to pull matter into them. But not all material near a black hole finds itself lost. Some bits of matter just outside the point of no return (called the event horizon) are accelerated away at near-light speeds, creating jets of particles shooting out above and below the black holes.

"I like to call black holes 'cosmic LHCs,' or very powerful particle accelerators," Nemmen said, referring to the Large Hadron Collider, an underground machine in Switzerland that speeds protons to 99.9999991 percent the speed of light.

When matter is spun away from a black hole in the form of a jet, most of its energy goes into its motion, but some of it is changed into light in the form of gamma-rays. Nemmen and his team studied findings on 293 previously observed black holes and calculated how efficiently the jets converted energy to light. They found that the rate scaled across the range of black holes.

"This was one of the surprises of this work, that this efficiency of conversion of the energy into light is essentially the same for black holes with very different masses, very different ages and completely different environments," Nemmen said.

Black holes are powerful beasts, interesting in and of themselves. But by accelerating ionized gas, they also have the potential to change their environment. Heating up space, they could affect the production of new stars, thereby influencing the galaxy they live in.

"These jets might be powerful agents of creating changes in the host galaxy," Nemmen said.

http://www.space.com/18893-black-hole-jets-similarities.html

~

WATER emitted from a black hole:

http://www.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de/pressreleases/2003/2

http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2013/11/image-of-the-day-the-milky-ways-cosmic-water-geysers.html

Discovery of WATER being emitted from a black hole....

~

http://i61.tinypic.com/jzcox3.jpg

In ancient Egyptian this is the letter N:

http://i40.tinypic.com/vnlf7n.jpg

Three of them make the word for water:

http://i40.tinypic.com/vnlf7n.jpg
http://i40.tinypic.com/vnlf7n.jpg
http://i40.tinypic.com/vnlf7n.jpg

There has been much speculation about the constellation represented by four stars encircled by an ovoid

http://i59.tinypic.com/5x2ali.jpg

The wavy lines around the middle star (three of them) represent WATER.....Which is also the "PRIMER" to the code.
I'll get into the code later.....

Interesting no? Coincidence? We'll see...I'll give you time to digest some of this information....then I'll be back with those dates...Hand needs a rest.

"Glaciers melting in the dead of night...."


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LgcDpTH47g&index=20&list=FL_ykjY3_7A8F_vL1uYLo-iw

Note: there are 3 n's in the word:

"In the beginning...god created...."



The first day of creation in the 1493 Nuremberg Chronicle

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/02/Nuremberg_chronicles_-_f_2v.png/800px-Nuremberg_chronicles_-_f_2v.png

~

Last for this post:

Wasn't it Russia that was some how involved in this spinnning light show?


When matter is spun away from a black hole in the form of a jet, most of its energy goes into its motion, but some of it is changed into light in the form of gamma-rays. Nemmen and his team studied findings on 293 previously observed black holes and calculated how efficiently the jets converted energy to light. They found that the rate scaled across the range of black holes.

http://i60.tinypic.com/b8ptoo.jpg

Blueshift: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blueshift

The inner horizon, radiation is blueshifted as it accumulates.

"Field of Turquoise and the Blue One, Lake of Turquoise,
traveling with turquoise, Lord of Turquoise, and open door of the blue sky".

Indicates blueshift or the high frequency light associated with
approaching radiation.

In contrast, radiation moving away from the observer appears redshifted.
The Dead King observes:

he who departs is red and smeared

"N" has gone up in the red hour.

http://jandeane81.com/threads/7186-6-Degrees-of-Separation-Order-from-Chaos?p=841929281&viewfull=1#post841929281

Shadowself
5th July 2015, 15:41
Good morning!

I know what you're thinking. Lot's of this seems quite ambiguous right? I thought so too for awhile until I started connecting some dots.

I have to run errands here today but will be back with those dates I promised.

Here is a teaser:

Want to see the night sky when the Norway spiral occurred FROM Norway? For kicks and giggles because I didn't know the exact time I plugged in 11:11...and the date December 9th, 2009. here it is:

http://i58.tinypic.com/2hol21j.jpg

Oh wait couldn't be! On 10 December 2009, the Russian Ministry of Defence confirmed that a Bulava missile test had failed.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcy8o0gj-A0

Shadowself
5th July 2015, 20:22
okay then;

Lots of speculation on this blue spiral from Norway. The photo I presented was a view from Norway.

But through some efforts there was an analysis done on this thing what ever it was.

It was determined the center volocity was at 8000 RPM's. Can you imagine! It was also determined that this spiral was not directly over Norway but:


Contrary to some assertions that have placed this event over Norway or Finland, the vector analysis establishes the initial spiral over the Russian province of Murmansk and the Kola Peninsula with the origin (contrail) located in the vicinity of the western White Sea...

Oh okay so back to the drawing board. It was headed Northeast so I reconfigured it from Murmansk in a NE direction....Here is what I got. I also determined it happened just before 8AM so I used 7:53 as the time...

http://i60.tinypic.com/2hi9tew.jpg

But that is not the interesting part. In this analysis in 2011 they analyzed a video:

http://www.spellconsulting.com/reality/Norway_Spiral.html#4._Void_Expansion_and_Translati on_Velocities

Where at the end it created one huge "apparent" black hole:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxA0Asq2YDg

Shadowself
5th July 2015, 22:02
So in 2009 the Russians had a foul up test which at first they denied then the next day admitted.

A few years later:

Then later I start up with this group where somebody tells me and other members of this group that there is this experiment being done in Russia. It involves a pyramid...it involves "brackish water"...it involves a "crystal top" to the pyramid....and quite interestingly it has an "atomic clock" perched in the center toward the top.

Then I'm told that they are going to "test" this thing...possibly...on August 11, 2012.

Well now...That it turns out is quite an interesting date. It happens to be the date the Mayan Calander was started. To be exact it was the starting-point equivalent to August 11, 3114 BCE in the proleptic Gregorian calendar or 6 September in the Julian calendar (−3113 astronomical).

So I checked out these dates and a few others and noticed pattern.

First date to check the one of the supposed test: August 11, 2012

An alignment of the moon, Jupiter, and Aldebaran.

http://i59.tinypic.com/zlqmhl.jpg

Okay I thought what's the significance? First thing I thought of was Jupiter as a great relay power station of sorts. But remember this was just a test right? A measurement of sorts. But for what? And why? I really had no idea.

Then I started to look into this date and much to my surprise I ran into this star Aldebaran once again. Only this time it was in the middle of the pacific ocean.

So, here I am one morning having my coffee while researching the Cornell University Library for "philosophy of physics" and what do you suppose pops up?

Excuse me while I pick myself up off the floor and retrieve my coffee cup....I find this:

Title:

The Astronomical and Ethnological Components
of the Cult of Bird -Man on Easter Island

What? What the heck is that doing in the "Physics" category I ask myself?

So I click on it and do a bit of skim reading.

My eyes popped out of my head!

Astronomical Simulations as the Main Clue: Part 2...Page 6 & 7 of PDF

http://i60.tinypic.com/3091spf.jpg

http://i59.tinypic.com/11j6ner.jpg

http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1309/1309.6056.pdf

reading this part 2...

Aldebaran you say?

Reading further...

August 10 or August 11 was an important date in the Mataveri calendar. It is possible that the
natives waited for the helical rising of the bright star Pollux (β Geminorum). It happened on August 10 from A.D. 1690 to A.D. 1720, and on August 11 from A.D. 1721 to A.D. 1796. I believe that on that day many warriors and priests met there and at Orongo


So, let me get this straight. These priest gather on this date and have these humungous statues built for what exactly? When?

And according to the author Churchward, Mu "extended from somewhere north of Hawaii to the south as far as the Fijis and Easter Island."...ETC ETC ETC???


And they're a cult of bird-man/men?

Then to top it off the flippin' Mayans create a calendar that BEGINS on August 11?

~

So I checked those dates:

August 10, 1690
http://i58.tinypic.com/f22bld.jpg

August 11, 1796 when the dates stopped for this particular activity at Easter Island:

http://i59.tinypic.com/rkcv9l.jpg

Notice the proximity of Jupiter in all of these...

Shadowself
5th July 2015, 22:26
So let's take a look at the Mayan Calendar dates:


starting-point equivalent to August 11, 3114 BCE in the proleptic Gregorian calendar or 6 September in the Julian calendar (−3113 astronomical).

August 11 3114:

http://i60.tinypic.com/m7yp2e.jpg

Sep 6 3113

http://i58.tinypic.com/2d9plqr.jpg

http://i60.tinypic.com/900fwi.jpg

Now...let's look at that big day where nothing happened on December 21, 2012

http://i59.tinypic.com/ws1jrq.jpg

http://i62.tinypic.com/2cg1mk4.jpg

Are you seeing the pattern? The proximity to Jupiter and the line of sight to Aldebaran?

Shadowself
5th July 2015, 22:40
That's about it for today...my hand is giving out. Next the missing boat Mars and the code with center stage:


Aldebaran

http://i58.tinypic.com/e9yq2o.jpg


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvYd8nEx-Pc

Shadowself
6th July 2015, 15:46
Okay...I don't have much time today. But I'd like to add this conversation between Icam88 and myself which was off topic on the thread but needs to be put here:

Posts number 106 through 109 here:

http://jandeane81.com/threads/7322-A-serious-question?p=841931156&viewfull=1#post841931156

For further response.

Thanks Icam88!

lcam88
6th July 2015, 15:52
Welcome.

Shadowself
6th July 2015, 17:02
Quote Originally Posted by lcam88 View Post
Yes, I think I saw it there too. I even shared the link you quote from on your thread post number 67 on page 5.

The effect occurs on any spinning mass (all planets, the sun everything) or spinning energy. The experimenters at andersoninstitute use 12 lasers, an proprietary mixture of gases including a noble, and a frequency...

In terms of Jupiter being a power source for time dialation effects elsewhere, it is possible, but the means of transferring that energy would need to be artificial and would therefore be an implementation of some type of engineering.
Yeah you did...I totally missed it. Sorry....it was post number 67...I just saw it. I'll have to check out this site further....it seems right up my ally. Thanks!

Noting: lasers and crystals go hand in hand no? The "man made" test pyramid I described yesterday? (she says tongue in cheek)

http://www.rp-photonics.com/laser_crystals.html

One of the things I was studying with that "group" was lasers and crystals for such an "experiment".

I have to get ready for work soon...but please do continue if you have anything to add to this conversation Icam88. It's most welcome and appreciated. Particularly regarding lasers. :eyebrows:

lcam88
6th July 2015, 17:24
Take a look at 3D image projections as done in modern 3D movies. The depth to which optics is understood is very interesting.

The 1st version of 3D involved green and red filters, one color over each eye to cause each eye to see a different image.

A second version was done with vertical and horizontal polarized light. That is imperfect because tilting the head...

The laster version still uses polarized light, but polarization is done radially. the glasses you use filter light based on whether it is polarized clockwise, or counter-clockwise. The technology used to project the light involves using crystals (and white light rather than lasers). The idea of radial polarization reveals something I think is very very interesting about the nature of light that we often overlook in the more ordinary models.

Lasers and holography reveal another interesting nature of light.

Very very briefly, if you do not know of how holograms, lasers and holographic images are related:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tjWznlGst9M

This video too, demonstrates another nature of light that is often overlooked in ordinary models. In a way, it supports the idea backing computer modeling using ray tracing. But the reality is likely to be more elegant than that.

Certainly the holographic photography directly registers aspects of the wave properties that are present in light.

EDIT: Shall we go into crystals and lasers more directly? This is more your area of expertise; I'm not sure what direction you are taking. I love your hints though.

Shadowself
6th July 2015, 17:35
EDIT: Shall we go into crystals and lasers more directly? This is more your area of expertise; I'm not sure what direction you are taking. I love your hints though.

Absolutely! I'm on my way out the door in ten minutes for work...I'll have something good to read during my breaks I'm hoping!

Thanks in advance!

Dreamtimer
17th July 2015, 15:10
Shadowself, definitely interested in more. Early in the month when we were visiting family I shared some of the information you provided about the number 42. Also, I bought some books on sale at the local library and one called Vellum is very interesting. Reminding me of some of the things you've shared. I didn't want to push due to your hand. Whenever you're ready...:popc: (finally decided to break out the munchies)

lcam88
17th July 2015, 15:31
Indeed interested.

I queue a portion of Harald Kautz Vella where he explains scalar physics (with interruptions) in a very systematic and beautiful succinct way. So I'll link the post here too.

http://jandeane81.com/threads/7421-Scalar-Wave-technology-Becoming-4D-achieving-12-strand-DNA?p=841932409&viewfull=1#post841932409

Just out of curiosity and running the risk of asking something already revealed: Where was that Egyptian chart you refer to found?

Shadowself
17th July 2015, 15:40
Are you referring to the star map? If so it was discovered in the tomb of Senemut

On post number 56 and 57 here:

http://jandeane81.com/threads/7186-6-Degrees-of-Separation-Order-from-Chaos?p=841929284&viewfull=1#post841929284

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronomical_ceiling_of_Senemut_Tomb

I'll check out the link you provided but I'll be leaving for work soon and probably won't have time to comment until tomorrow..

TGIF!!!

Shadowself
17th July 2015, 16:16
ps; Listening now. Very interesting and while I'm still listening I'm reminded of this:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BpHtwnyvIvw

He's also discussing the "back reaction" of a wave. Interesting.

lcam88
17th July 2015, 16:16
http://i60.tinypic.com/2lrl15.jpg

Is conceptually very very similar to a compound (nanoparticle) barium strontium titanate.

http://www.microwavejournal.com/article_images/0405m27_fig01.jpg

Shadowself
18th July 2015, 11:36
Shame on you for making me have to look that up before I've had my first cup of coffee in the morning! LOL

:tea:

Actually that is a pretty interesting connection of dots you've got there.

Noting that: Barium titanate crystals find use in nonlinear optics. Which of course is a branch of optics that describes the behavior of light in nonlinear media, that is, media in which the dielectric polarization P responds nonlinearly to the electric field E of the light. This nonlinearity is typically only observed at very high light intensities (values of the electric field comparable to interatomic electric fields, typically 108 V/m) such as those provided by lasers. Above the Schwinger limit, the vacuum itself is expected to become nonlinear. In nonlinear optics, the superposition principle no longer holds.

Nonlinear optics remained unexplored until the discovery of Second harmonic generation shortly after demonstration of the first laser.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barium_titanate

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonlinear_optics

All that before I had my coffee! Whew! Didn't we leave off on lasers last week?

Shadowself
18th July 2015, 11:53
Just to clarify my comment here regarding the video you provided:


He's also discussing the "back reaction" of a wave. Interesting.

(I'm working on my second cup of coffee here ) :shocked:

In the de Broglie–Bohm theory, also known as the pilot-wave theory I once heard a physicist describe the back reaction like this:


Geometry acts on Matter/Energy telling it how to move,

while Matter/Energy has a reciprocal Back-Reaction on Geometry telling it how to bend.

...

"In accord with Chalmer's idea, the wavefunction is intrinsically 'mental' capable of qualia."

...and he suggests equating the guiding wave in Bohmian mechanics with the mental aspect of the universe, generally: the particles are "matter," "mind" the pilot-wave.

That might be uninteresting except for the next step:the "mental" aspect of the universe can be upgraded to life and consciousness by self-organization. This happens when a physical system uses its own nonlocality in its organization. In this case a feedback loop is created, as follows: the system configures itself so as to set up its own Bohmian pilot wave, which in turn directly affects its physical configuration which then affects its nonlocal pilot wave which affects the configuration, etc...

Normally in quantum mechanics this "back-action" is not taken into account. The wave guides the particles but the back-action of the particle onto the wave is not systematically calculated - of course, the back-reaction is physically real: the movement of the particle determines the initial conditions of the next round of calculation. But there is no systematic way to characterize such feedback. One reason that this works in practice is that for systems that are not self organizing the back-action may not exert any systematic effect.

This is an interesting way to utilize nonlocality despite Eberhard's proof that point-to-point signaling by the quantum connection is not in the cards! (If a physical system occupied a dynamical stability based on such a feedback loop then it would be a "nonlocal" physical system, without superluminal signals.)

Questions of consciousness aside, consideration of "back-action" as a dynamical fact nourishes a suspicion that linear quantum theory is fundamentally an approximation...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Broglie%E2%80%93Bohm_theory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualia


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0AipdgHRtI

~

Adding this of my own perceived notions and past research:


~

Time

A temporal dimension is a dimension of time. Time is often referred to as the "fourth dimension" for this reason, but that is not to imply that it is a spatial dimension. A temporal dimension is one way to measure physical change.

It is perceived differently from the three spatial dimensions in that there is only one of it, and that we cannot move freely in time but subjectively move in one direction.

~

Charge = Amplitude to Emit

EMIT ~ TIME

~

ENTANGLEMENT. Erwin Schrödinger called this phenomenon the defining trait of quantum theory. Einstein famously dubbed it spukhafte Fernwirkungen: "spooky action at a distance". It is not hard to understand why. Set things up correctly, and you can instantaneously affect the physical properties of a particle on the other side of the universe simply by prodding its entangled twin. This is no longer just a curiosity of the quantum world, visible only in excruciatingly delicate experiments. Physicists now believe that entanglement between particles exists everywhere, all the time, and have recently found shocking evidence that it affects the wider, "macroscopic" world that we inhabit. It is a discovery that might have far-reaching consequences. Not only will it give us a better grip on technological applications, such as quantum computing and cryptography, and the teleportation of quantum states, it could also open up a whole new realm of reality.

~


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZBJGzoVPzA&feature=youtu.be

~

Quantum Steering into the Past

Motivated by the question, which kind of physical interactions and processes are needed for the production of quantum entanglement, Peres has put forward the radical idea of delayed-choice entanglement swapping. There, entanglement can be “produced a posteriori, after the entangled particles have been measured and may no longer exist.” In this work we report the first realization of Peres’ gedanken experiment. Using four photons, we can actively delay the choice of measurement – implemented via a high-speed tunable bipartite state analyzer and a quantum random number generator – on two of the photons into the time-like future of the registration of the other two photons. This effectively projects the two already registered photons onto one definite of two mutually exclusive quantum states in which either the photons are entangled (quantum correlations) or separable (classical correlations). This can also be viewed as “quantum steering into the past”.

In the entanglement swapping1-3 procedure, two pairs of entangled photons are produced, and one photon from each pair is sent to Victor. The two other photons from each pair are sent to Alice and Bob, respectively. If Victor projects his two photons onto an entangled state, Alice’s and Bob’s photons are entangled although they have never interacted or shared any common past. What might be considered as even more puzzling is Peres’ idea of “delayed-choice for entanglement swapping”4. In this gedanken experiment, Victor is free to choose either to project his two photons onto an entangled state and thus project Alice’s and Bob’s photons onto an entangled state, or to measure them individually and then project Alice’s and Bob’s photons onto a separable state. If Alice and Bob measure their photons’ polarization states before Victor makes his choice and projects his two photons either onto an entangled state or onto a separable state, it implies that whether their two photons are entangled (showing quantum correlations) or separable (showing classical correlations) can be defined after they have been measured. In order to experimentally realize Peres’ gedanken experiment, we place Victor’s choice and measurement in the time-like future of Alice’s and Bob’s measurements, providing a “delayed-choice” configuration in any and all reference frames. This is accomplished by (1) proper optical delays for Victor’s photons and (2) a high-speed tunable bipartite state analyzer, which (3) is controlled in real time by a quantum random number generator. Both delay and randomness are needed to avoid the possibility that the photon pairs can “know” in advance which setting will be implemented after they are registered and can behave accordingly by producing results of a definite entangled or a definite separable state. Whether Alice’s and Bob’s photons can be assigned an entangled state or a separable state depends on Victor’s later choice. In Peres’ words:

“if we attempt to attribute an objective meaning to the quantum state of a single system, curious paradoxes appear: quantum effects mimic not only instantaneous action-at-a-distance but also, as seen here, influence of future actions on past events, even after these events have been irrevocably Recorded."

http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1203/1203.4834.pdf

~



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XlGRWPgvgw&feature=youtu.be

http://i59.tinypic.com/1zfh2sn.jpg

lcam88
20th July 2015, 15:09
Barium strontium titanate is thought to be a component of chem trails, according to Mr Vella, because of its piezoelectric properties. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piezoelectricity) once energized... Crystals are grown by putting the ingredientes into a jet engines combustion "chamber". Those ingredients are part of the makeup of a special JP8 formula that is used to fuel certain aircrafts...

I'm going to absorb the materials you posted... Very interesting.

EDIT:

I continue to rationalize along the following lines: These entanglement properties already exist, and they already are working in a consistent and uniform manner. Maybe the issue is not how to derive "new" entanglements but how to observe the ones already in existence; why reinvent the wheel?

I touch on this same rational in my bearing ball analogy (which may be fitting to add here, but I'll let you decide).

In a way Mr Vella hinted at how it works in that vid when he also detailed how scalar potential can shift "information" in a way that is not limited by space and time the way luminosity is. He used blood as an example; how his emotional experiences will cause reactions in his blood chemistry even if the blood was taken and transporte to a distant location. He then mentioned the Russian astronomer...

I like the excited nature the man has as he explains "back reactions". That was nice to see.

EDIT 2:

My reference to suggest that entanglement already happens all around us all the time is based on ideas from The Universal One that explains exchanges of "thinking mind" around page 45 (Chapter XI - Energy Transmission). At the time the book was published, terminology might not have been well known by the author so he creates his own references in the prior pages. These references creates a type of code, so I only understand parallels based on interactivity between "subject matter" references. Sort of like matching the pattern.

And I must say that Walter Russell describes the interactivity of Quantum Entanglement in a much more elegant manner only because of the simplicity.

The details science introduces in the first video you share in the prior posting is full of specific nomenclature that is meaningless without researching the theory behind it. So much so that the speaker even uses metaphor to try and get the point across, likening his views to "conscious computers" and the likes.

The problem with specific nomenclature: when you look the material up, it is presented as part of a theory that is shaded by all manner of creative idea attempting to explain what was priorly observed in some dimension and form. Russell sidesteps this "problem" by explaining what-is from a viewpoint of "Mind" where everything originates. That solution creates certain problems because then you must find the parallels on your own and indeed, with regard to that, I admit a chance of error with my suggestions above and in the PM I sent you.

Shadowself
21st July 2015, 04:23
Well, You got me there. I'm not that familiar with scalar wave tech. And unfortunately There has been lots of generalization to the subject that is a bit confusing to me particularly.

I want to take some time tomorrow morning and listen to that video once again and perhaps some of his continuing videos to see exactly what he is getting at. Mr Vella that is.

I was pretty impressed with your idea using the bearing ball as a way to explain the back reaction and it's probably not too far off from what I read quickly. But I'm going to have to read it again, because as you know when I skim read I tend to leave things out on occasion...LOL :whstl:

One thing we have both left out of the equation is dark energy and it's effects.

I just got off work this evening and have to tell you my intention Saturday was to get into the code in the tomb. But unfortunately right after my last post I took some medicine my doctor gave me to help my wrist condition and I had a really bad allergic reaction to it. So I was toast for the rest of the weekend.

I think it's time to get to it now. I've pretty much added most of what I need to reference to explain it fully. So from time to time I will be going back to some of the posts here in this thread for reference.

Here's the thing...I could be wrong on this code thing but I really don't believe I am. It's just too prevalent to ignore or disregard. I think you'll see what I mean when we get into it.

Now as far as decoding it fully we will probably need somebody that has some experience in cryptography. But that won't stop us to discover that it's actually a form of cryptography which I also believe I've already accomplished. You'll see what I mean when I get into it.

If I'm correct, what I think I've stumbled upon is some serious proof of time travel. Also if I'm correct and this is indeed proof of time travel it was made to fit the "Unproven theorem paradox".


So, first thing we need to look for is the "theorem"

A theorem and its proof are typically laid out as follows:

Theorem - (name of person who proved it and year of discovery, proof or publication).

Statement of theorem - (sometimes called the proposition).

Proof.

Description of proof.

End mark.

(Some of which I believe we've already accomplished in part)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theorem

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom

The "unproven theorem paradox" is described as such once again:

“The “unproved theorem” paradox points out that if there are CTCs, then it might be possible to take a published proof of a theorem into the past and present it to someone, who then uses it to produce the very manuscript that leads to the theorem’s publication

Read posts 63 & 65 once again if needed here:

http://jandeane81.com/threads/7186-6-Degrees-of-Separation-Order-from-Chaos?p=841929298&viewfull=1#post841929298

Now comes the fun part ;)

lcam88
21st July 2015, 12:35
Because you mention the ball bearing example of back reaction, I'm going to post that part of the PM here, just for others to follow:


Let's suppose we observe a bearing ball. We know that matter is intrinsically energy and while we consider it is also a wave, as per theory of relativity creating a relationship between luminous light with material [light] in a relationship described by the famous equation, perhaps it's one aspect this same "back reaction" that prevents the ball bearing from distributing it's energy in all directions in each moment. The persistence of the ball bearing is, in a way, a moment of up-concentration of energy.

But let's suppose that the energy is indeed distributed in all directions, we could add the other aspect of "back reaction" as a result of that "explosion of energy" that would reformulate the geometries so that in the following moment there is an equivalent implosion that recreates the ball bearing and reseting the geometry for the next explosion... ?

In this way the cyclical nature of Bohmian mechanics is actually exerting and upholding a systematic effect in a continuous and never ending way. This interpretation is a simplification of the actual description that Walter Russell proposed in his 1926 publication.

What Walter added was that waves where the product of Thinking Mind, and that thinking mind was not random. The ball bearing wouldn't distribute it's energy randomly, but in tune with every other aspect of thinking mind in a way that correlates to how "significant" the interacting experience between any to bodies may be. That withholding, that these reciprocating energies form persistence in that the "standing" waves formed between thousands if not millions of participating bodies is stable.

I don't know if I've taken your explanation and added anything useful to the notions or ignored fundamental aspects that need to be observed. But if the idea is, then we should expect the sun to follow the same pattern, it would not radiate heat in all directions equally. It would radiate light to each star specifically, and it would be directing it's energies more specifically to each planet. I'm not saying empty space does not participate in the interaction, but certainly it doesn't participate as much as a planet.

Furthermore, each aspect participant in the sharing of light with the sun, would reciprocate that energy back. These flows, referred to as actinic rays (http://pondscienceinstitute.on-rev.c...actinic%20rays) would be composed to these two flows and quite possibly a third component representing a neutral or inertial component between the two.

Maybe?

I don't like exceptions to the norm, that is too "miraculous" or begging for newer exotic explanations of subjectivity. However, I accept the idea that certain things are not obvious to observe, that manipulations can have effects. Quantum theory falls into the prior category of explaining exceptions. <shrug/>

It seems that someone on the other "magic thread" who quoted the words "you must unlearn what you have learned" may be on to something much more profound than first meets the eye


Well, You got me there. I'm not that familiar with scalar wave tech. And unfortunately There has been lots of generalization to the subject that is a bit confusing to me particularly.

Me too, I'm just going to build my understanding from the very basics. I think you need first hand experience to truly understand and grasp the meanings; furthermore, don't theorize as much.

You can observe scalar aspects even when they are not scalar. Observing a stream or creek for some time and it is possible to observe all four types of waves. The scalar medium is not significantly different, just it's "form" or the way we perceive dimension may change. When Mr Vella talks about scalar potential, he talks about a concentration of energy with the potential for some kind of "use". Voltage is electrical potential by definition, Water held in a dam holds potential in relation to the lower water level and in the presence of gravity. Scalar potential is just a moment outside of 3d space/time where energy awaits a moment where there is an impedance match so it may interact in a new "entanglement" at that realm.

You can identify subtle energetics of the scalar nature when you watch a debate between two academics, when you watch a thunderstorm (where do you think the lightening and weather formations gets their energies), when you watch a rocket lift off. That last one is interesting, challenge the assumption that inertia is directly associated with mass, what if it is more about "spin" in local space (thinking of the way relativity depicts gravity as a curvature...)? What if the rocket actually bends spacetime during it's energy expenditure, in a way that is similar to the monk meditating on the sound of a trumpet? Can you actually make a case that it is not so without presuming inertia is associated with mass?

So the first step would be to try and show that inertia is indeed only associated with mass before going into the details of the rocket science. And lastly, here is an interesting article: http://www.forbes.com/sites/ethansiegel/2015/05/04/no-nasa-did-not-accidentally-invent-warp-drive/ Is it a type of electromagnetic helmholds resonator grabbing energy from somewhere?

I think that first video with Mr Vella is worth watching in it's entirety FYI, the second and third diverge into other areas that don't do a lot to understand the science, they go into effects associated with the scalar.

PS Thanks for the coordinates to #63 and #65 :)

Shadowself
21st July 2015, 15:59
...what if it is more about "spin" in local space (thinking of the way relativity depicts gravity as a curvature...)? What if the rocket actually bends spacetime during it's energy expenditure, in a way that is similar to the monk meditating on the sound of a trumpet? Can you actually make a case that it is not so without presuming inertia is associated with mass?

Indeed! I agree with this very much.

Wish I had more time to write today but I left you an answer non the less in your inbox...hope you enjoy it!

Shadowself
22nd July 2015, 16:11
I am adding this image and ask that while listening to this video you occasionally look at it.

http://i42.tinypic.com/sooevk.jpg

CTC's

In mathematical physics, a closed timelike curve (CTC) is a world line in a Lorentzian manifold, of a material particle in spacetime that is "closed", returning to its starting point.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCSDwxJXgEI

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed_timelike_curve

Time travel experiment demonstrates how to avoid the grandfather paradox (Update)

http://phys.org/news/2011-03-grandfather-paradox.html

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/16/World_line.svg/2000px-World_line.svg.png

lcam88
22nd July 2015, 19:38
The rose blooming in my garden is of Acturus a part as it is of you and me.

The universe sways to the swaying of the rose in my garden.

Some perspective regarding...

MaryMay
26th July 2015, 05:45
A cube:

Four sides with a top and a bottom = 6 sides

Hypercube:

In geometry, a hypercube is an n-dimensional analogue of a square (n = 2) and a cube (n = 3). It is a closed, compact, convex figure whose 1-skeleton consists of groups of opposite parallel line segments aligned in each of the space's dimensions, perpendicular to each other and of the same length.


tesseract:

In geometry, the tesseract, also called an 8-cell or regular octachoron or cubic prism, is the four-dimensional analog of the cube; the tesseract is to the cube as the cube is to the square. Just as the surface of the cube consists of 6 square faces, the hypersurface of the tesseract consists of 8 cubical cells. The tesseract is one of the six convex regular 4-polytopes.

Oh look what I see!


A generalization of the cube to dimensions greater than three is called a "hypercube", "n-cube" or "measure polytope"

http://i61.tinypic.com/sdlg03.jpg

Now isn't that the thing found in the middle of the Black hole in the move Interstellar?

But wait...


~

A six cube!

In geometry, a 6-cube is a six-dimensional hypercube with 64 vertices, 192 edges

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/6-cube


~


If you intersect lines from all sides of a cube you would get a single point totaling 6 with a point in the middle. Add another point for a total of seven points. But the cube only has 6 sides...intersecting to make a point in the middle.

Now add an outside point that would be a total of 8

8 X 8 = 64

Oh boy there's that number again!

But let me show you something else

A point of origin and destination:

http://i60.tinypic.com/2lrl15.jpg

And let me show you one other thing:

Look at the inverted long V shape with the Red Dot (Aldebaran)

And look at this:

Check out the "7th" seal!

seven points to outline a course to a position...to find a destination within any three dimensional space, you need six points to determine the exact location...but to chart a course, you need a point of origin...

So, which came first the chicken or the egg? Am I seeing a Hollywood movie made on this or this was made from a Hollywood movie? Because I'm telling you there it sits in an 18th dynasty tomb!

http://i57.tinypic.com/33a3vjc.jpg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypercube

Gamma symbol:

http://www.decodeunicode.org/de/data/glyph/196x196/0263.gif

Flipped around:

http://i57.tinypic.com/33a3vjc.jpg

Gamma/Time Dilation


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlJNsRZ4WxI&feature=share&list=PLcUY9vudNKBNwkTA_1VWz8JeqO8HU15qo&index=2


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGsbBw1I0Rg&feature=share&list=PLcUY9vudNKBNwkTA_1VWz8JeqO8HU15qo&index=1



Squaring the circle

There are three classical problems in Greek mathematics which were extremely influential in the development of geometry. These problems were those of squaring the circle, doubling the cube and trisecting an angle. Although these are closely linked, we choose to examine them in separate articles. The present article studies what has become the most famous for these problems, namely the problem of squaring the circle or the quadrature of the circle as it is sometimes called.

One of the fascinations of this problem is that it has been of interest throughout the whole of the history of mathematics. From the oldest mathematical documents known up to the mathematics of today the problem and related problems concerning π have interested both professional mathematicians and amateur mathematicians.

One of the oldest surviving mathematical writings is the Rhind papyrus, named after the Scottish Egyptologist A Henry Rhind who purchased it in Luxor in 1858. It is a scroll about 6 metres long and 1/3 of a metre wide and was written around 1650 BC by the scribe Ahmes who copied a document which is 200 years older. This gives date for the original papyrus of about 1850 BC but some experts believe that the Rhind papyrus is based on a work going back to 3400 BC.

You can see more about the Rhind papyrus in the History topic article Egyptian papyri.

More here:

http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/history/HistTopics/Squaring_the_circle.html

~

Squaring the Circle

An interesting fact is that it is because π is transcendental that it’s impossible to square the circle, as the ancients had tried so hard to do. This fact became known only in the nineteenth century, when algebraic numbers became well-understood. It so happens that to square the circle, meaning to construct with straightedge and compass a square whose area is the same as that of a given circle, is tantamount to solving an equation with rational coefficients and getting π as the solution. This is impossible because π is transcendental, and therefore not algebraic. There can never be such an equation that would yield π as a solution.

From this:

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/2014/06/06/century-old-math-mystery-solved/#.VYcr5fnYF0z

~

Meton: Ah! These are my special rods for measuring the air. You see, the air is shaped - how shall I put it? - like a sort of extinguisher: so all I have to do is to attach this flexible rod at the upper extremity, take the compasses, insert the point here, and - you see what I mean?

Peisthetaerus: No.

Meton: Well I now apply the straight rod - so - thus squaring the circle: and there you are. In the center you have your market place: straight streets leading into it, from here, from here, from here. Very much the same principle, really, as the rays of a star: the star itself is circular, but sends out straight rays in every direction.

http://i60.tinypic.com/x2o1e9.jpg

Like this:

http://i60.tinypic.com/2lrl15.jpg

Wow! you are super smart! I think I could maybe grok this in the morning with some coffee, but right now Im getting it right brain style..

Shadowself
26th July 2015, 23:48
Thank you MaryMay however I have so much more to learn I feel like a beginner most of the time.

Right brain is a great place to start!

Chester
1st August 2015, 15:02
First let's start off by measuring sound.

Harmonic Series:

Notice designated numerical value given to f-Sharp

http://i42.tinypic.com/1zzg9z6.jpg



How odd that the frequency for F-Sharp is 2816

That it is the 11th Harmonic

What is mod9?

Dracon
1st August 2015, 15:20
Shadowself: This is brilliant. Thank you on behalf of this planet. Long overdue ;) (I'm sure you understand why I say this)


Please know you have my absolute respect and love.

Chester
1st August 2015, 16:52
So, we spend all this time talking about randomness and it's not real. Have the evolutionists heard?

I wonder how long the odds-makers have known. Sam?

Now I feel like I need to research knowledge about hubs.

Part 1

Actually - odds making is a science that must ignore "other worldly possibility."

Also, depending on the goals of "the client" of an odds maker (whereby the client can also BE the odds maker) determines which odds are desired. I would imagine this statement may not make sense so I will give an example.

In a scenario where Team A is playing Team B such that if the game were played 1,000 times and there are no ties possible such as a basketball game, that Team A would win 500 times and Team B would win 500 one would imagine that the odds put out by a book maker would logically be "pick em'" (where the money line is the same for both sides and there is no point spread. But perhaps in this same scenario, Team A is a widely popular selection and Team B is discounted by the general public. The odds maker would take this into consideration and perhaps open Team A up as a 1.5 point favorite. All meant to achieve a balanced book for the bookie.

But then we have the wiseguys who wait for that line to get pushed up to -2 or higher. And when they perceive the public has bet it up as far as it will go, they will pounce on that +2 or better Team B selection.

Some books will keep their line low as they prefer NOT to get the bets from the wiseguys so they will stay at -1 or even pickem.

All the above is simply meant to demonstrate that an odds maker takes the underlying view that everything IS random and that analysis of all the factors jammed into a computer program will predict the correct odds such that if the game were played 1,000 times, the won/loss amount would balance out.

Now for Part 2

What actually happens (when one pays close attention and has developed the capacity to read metaphors and other forms of not rational dot connection) one does indeed discover the most incredible anomalies. Sometimes, to see them in advance can pay off. They make absolutely zero handicapping sense yet...

A great example is the winner of the NFL Super Bowl XXXVI in 2002. Recall lovely 9/11 and recall the lovely legislation all ready to go into law we know was called "The Patriot Act." How odd that a team which had been mediocre for the past several years and had lost their starting QB in week 2 suddenly goes on a run where they end up winning the Super Bowl and just happen to be called, the Patriots.

I remember this one because of my own personal experience related to a precognition of 9/11 and thus, when I noticed the Pats start their run in early November, I placed a 100 wager at 27 to 1 that they win the Super Bowl all based on their name. Cha-ching.... I won.

Yet I will also admit that as far as sports betting goes, I am historically a loser financially. The reasons are more related to poor money management skills. I was a always a good handicapper, I just could not overcome my compulsions such as doubling up during losing streaks and backing off (to lock up winnings) when I was hot.

ZShawn
1st August 2015, 17:53
laws of probability indicate though that the house always wins in the end, no matter what streaks some individuals may tap into

how else did vegas get built except by hopium addicts bringing their money there by the barrow full

Chester
1st August 2015, 19:51
laws of probability indicate though that the house always wins in the end, no matter what streaks some individuals may tap into

how else did vegas get built except by hopium addicts bringing their money there by the barrow full

Bingo

Windancer
1st August 2015, 23:31
ShadowSelf, Amazing! how you have put this together.
Thank you for your time in this matter. Just skimming it is absolutely fascinating. Planning on going back now and looking deeper. I really like how you co-ordinate the tunes to the subject matter...sweet!

Dreamtimer
2nd August 2015, 16:47
"What if I told you of a certain predetermined Destiny Matrix that is used to the advantage of only a very discrete group? What if I told you it's used as and end to a means?" (from Hollywood Insider thread)

This is connected, is it not?

Shadowself
2nd August 2015, 23:30
"What if I told you of a certain predetermined Destiny Matrix that is used to the advantage of only a very discrete group? What if I told you it's used as and end to a means?" (from Hollywood Insider thread)

This is connected, is it not?

Possibly.....possibly. To be determined. If one can control time via information and travel...well....what do you think?

Dreamtimer
15th August 2015, 20:10
I listened to a recent video from the Farsight Institute regarding the Great Pyramid of Giza. One session was focused on the individual who desired to have the pyramids built.

This individual was perceived as an important male subject in an ornate building. He had a head injury or tumor. He knew this, was resigned to it. He wanted to leave a legacy.

There were some other individuals perceived and an 'unhealthy plot' to possibly kill someone.

There was a conflict over the release of information, and the control of that information.

There was advanced computer technology and storage of huge quantities of information.

I thought of this thread.

Shadowself
16th August 2015, 14:13
Good Morning!

Saw that video myself. Don't know what to think about it just yet.


On that note sorry for the delay on this thread. I have to confess my hand is giving me so many problems that I had to stop for awhile. I've had something called a Stellate Ganglion Nerve Block which has seemed to work only slightly. But the worst part is I started taking a drug that is a narcotic. Something called Oxycodone at 10 mgs. This stuff is HORRIBLE and while yes it killed the pain it's also probably killed some brain cells. I have stopped taking it for that very reason and told the doctor and his nurse to find a way to get rid of the pain and not mask it. I told them I would not be taking any more of this medicine/narcotic.

So while I was taking it I of course could not think straight because this stuff is killer to the thinking process. I've been off it for a week now and am feeling much better except my hand is killing me still. So now I'm in physical therapy and going to get one more nerve block as it's said the second one will probably do the trick. I'm hopeful anyway as this is really starting to get to me.

There's only so much you can do for this combination I've gotten of Kienbock's disease coupled with RSD. The RSD has taken over and it's not good. Don't believe me here is a site devoted to it and a video:

http://www.rsdhope.org/what-is-crps.html


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w162jg-X9o0

So this explains why I've stopped for awhile. Because when I get to it again I want to be very accurate with my writing and not be influenced by this condition I've found myself in.

Be patient...I will return to finish this.

ps; Any remote healers out there want to give it a shot....go for it! I need all the help I can get dealing with the medical industry!

Dreamtimer
16th August 2015, 18:45
Boy I hope your hand gets better! :unity:

I don't have any personal opinions on Courtney Brown or his work, but that sure caught my attention. I don't dismiss connections or coincidences as meaningless. If you recall the tailor Garak from DS9, he said, "...I believe in coincidences. I don't trust coincidences".:ninja:

I'll just do some reviewing in the meantime...:tea:

Shadowself
17th August 2015, 17:14
Good morning,

Somebody did a number/'healing on me last night and I'm feeling much better so I can add a little to this right now:

Some of the information I've presented so far to be sure is ambiguous summation.

I'm more than aware of that fact.

When I got to the 88 constellations of 76 + 12 =88 (constellations) I was first amazed. Then laughed my head off. How ambiguous is that!

It seems there is much greater tolerance of ambiguity, as it is often seen as an integral part of the human condition when answers cannot be found.

There is always an underlying background for every instance of signification. Thus, although some things may be certain, they may have little to do with the subject at hand. In fact they may be a decoy to the actual premise and information given.

Grappling with ambiguity: As long as philosophers and men have thought... most of them have tried to mask it. So while relevant information is achieved a matter of eliminating the ambiguity by making oneself more aware of such things as "encryption" and coding in this instance would probably be a far more logical route.

Ambiguous findings may be relevant by escaping from the sensible world or being engulfed by it. Yielding some interesting facts.

Ambiguity is used to indicate situations that involve uncertainty. When that presents itself it's certain in the case of encryption...you're on a decoy path. For example; you find a strong correlation with such attributes and factors that might lead to a conclusion that relates to the subject yet in the example of say encryption and codes you need to find the key.

Such as the numbers I've presented so far. Out of the blue 76 comes along and stumps me.

I told myself after a good long laugh then a bout of frustration, while that is compelling and worthwhile it's ambiguous and makes no sense where the other numbers are concerned. I asked myself what is the correlation to those numbers in the first place?

Now I direct you to the fact that there are far more than 7 & 6 gods at the bottom of that image in the tomb. But I also direct you to the fact that there are 7 on one side with red dots/discs and 6 on the other side with red dots/discs.

So what is the correlation that would lead to the conclusion there is encryption coding in this tomb from the future?

When my hand is better and I'm at full capacity you'll see....:eyebrows:

lcam88
17th August 2015, 18:14
Could encryption include simple "encoding" type obfucation?

For example consider ROT13

Sbe rknzcyr pbafvqre EBG68

is letter substitutions only. Consider the following Perl program that does Rot13 encoding (decoding) for your amusement:


#!/usr/bin/perl

while (<>) {
exit 0 if /^exit$/;
tr/a-zA-Z0-9/n-za-mN-ZA-M5-90-4/;
print;
}

It substitutes a-z with n-za-m same for numbers as a type of 13 character offseting for each glyph...

Dreamtimer
10th September 2015, 13:11
Oh where, oh where has Shadowself gone?
Oh where, oh where could she be?
With her mind so bright and her focus spot on,
Oh where, oh where could she be?

I spotted her beyond the Mists.....

I saw the diagram of the past and future light cones used by Cara St. Louis in a recent Bases interview. She views the plane where the two meet as being a transition point and almost out of time (if I understood/recall correctly).

I hope you'll be back soon Shadowself.

Shadowself
11th September 2015, 16:08
Did I hear a whisper? :smile2:

I'm on it. This weekend fur sure!

Shadowself
12th September 2015, 14:42
Okay...Good Morning!

Where was I? Oh yeah....CODE and Grappling with ambiguity!

So this is not to say what I've presented so far is wrong. In fact I think it's integral. It is however not solving for "N".

When I was first directed to this I was told there is encryption in this tomb. I was told only one thing then left on my own to find it. That one thing was:

"The primer is 3 "N's"

That's it. That's all I was told. Except it's on me to find it. That when I do find it I would be amazed.

Well I was. It took me a very long time of laughing, frustration and occasional delight when I would find certain paths.

I will tell you I still have a long way to go. I probably will never get the actual message in the encryption. It may be something as big as the secrets to the universe...time travel or something as simple as "Kilroy was here". However I doubt the latter would be the extent of such complex encryption when I show you the type I'm speaking of and discovered.

One reason I will probably never solve the complete encryption is it cannot be solved by that "image". That image is a drawing of the actual ceiling of the tomb. Which really looks like this:

http://www2.astronomicalheritage.net/index.php/gallery/entities/the-tomb-of-senenmut-at-western-thebes-egypt/38-the-tomb-of-senenmut-at-western-thebes-egypt/detail/144-decanal-stars?tmpl=component&phocadownload=2

To find the message I believe you would need an encryption expert and somebody that could decipher hieroglyphs from studying inside tomb itself. You probably would also need a computer. I think a great deal of the message is surrounding the false door presented before the ceiling. To know for certain you would have to be inside the tomb. I doubt very much I personally will ever get that advantage.

The numbers don't lie in this case and I'm about to show you part of the key in the next post that would illuminant this as such.

Shadowself
12th September 2015, 14:51
If you were to travel to the past and leave an encrypted message in a tomb you would want to leave no uncertainty that it comes from a certain time in the future. There are hundreds of different encryptions you can use. But you would want to use one recognizable to specific time.

You may want to get out your own basic kind of calculator to crunch some numbers with some easy math.

All the numbers I've presented so far seem to coordinate around a specific set.

You might want to leave a Rosetta stone of language/numbers. If you'll recall the Rosetta stone is a key that was used to decipher Egyptian hieroglyphs and it derived from the "3" languages on the stone.

Noting three doorways in the false door ~ Three languages/blocks of information.

You would want to use something STANDARD in the encryption process:

Introducing: Advanced Encryption Standard ~ Key sizes:128, 192 or 256 bits

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advance...ption_Standard

Rounds 10, 12 or 14 (depending on key size)

128 ~ 192 ~ 256 are multiples of 64 bits. The rest of the math I've already presented but....

A basic tutorial which you should watch to understand the rest of what I'm going to present here:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=liKXtikP9F0

So where is the "key" in the image? And where does 76 come into play?

Remember two languages and N the "primer"?

I went to look at the number 76 and discovered:

76 duodecimal number is 64 ~ 76-12 = 64 (bits)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/76_%28number%29

The duodecimal system (also known as base 12 or dozenal) is a positional notation numeral system using twelve as its base.

Historically, units of time in many civilizations are duodecimal. There are twelve signs of the zodiac, twelve months in a year, and the Babylonians had twelve hours in a day (although at some point this was changed to 24).

The number twelve (that is, the number written as "12" in the base ten numerical system) is instead written as "10" in duodecimal (meaning "1 dozen and 0 units", instead of "1 ten and 0 units"), whereas the digit string "12" means "1 dozen and 2 units"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duodecimal

Two Units ~ Two observable Eyes (on the false door)


The Egyptian hieroglyph for N = http://oi40.tinypic.com/vnlf7n.jpg

"3'of them equal = "Water" 3 is also the number of AES blocks: 128, 192, 256

the 12th letter of the Greek alphabet (remember the Rosetta Stone) is MU .

Mu was derived from the Egyptian hieroglyphic symbol for water

which is:

http://oi40.tinypic.com/vnlf7n.jpg
http://oi40.tinypic.com/vnlf7n.jpg
http://oi40.tinypic.com/vnlf7n.jpg


In this image in the bottom left corner is the "block" with the four stars one surrounded by an Ovid of "Water" (three wavy lines representing such)

http://www2.astronomicalheritage.net/index.php/gallery/entities/the-tomb-of-senenmut-at-western-thebes-egypt/38-the-tomb-of-senenmut-at-western-thebes-egypt/detail/144-decanal-stars?tmpl=component&phocadownload=2

In this image it's center top:

http://i42.tinypic.com/sooevk.jpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Block_cipher

Four stars ~ four to the fourth power is what?

Noting: "3" stars in a row with a fourth sub key

=

(AES) 256

256 - 76 = 180 + 12 = 192

This block is what is termed the WATERMARK.


In cryptography, a watermarking attack is an attack on disk encryption methods where the presence of a specially crafted piece of data (e.g., a decoy file) can be detected by an attacker without knowing the encryption key.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watermarking_attack

http://theory.stanford.edu/~mikeym/papers/SecureQIM.pdf

And this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Initialization_vector

Suffice it to say if this has "watermark encryption"....

As the blind guy said in the movie Contact: "there's a whole lot more here". He was basically discovering a digital "image" with "sound". Which would be the primary reason to decode this in the tomb with a computer at hand.

But that's not all...Next:

Shadowself
12th September 2015, 15:02
So that would be a bit less ambiguous :tea:

Open for interpretation as well. If that is indeed encryption of the AES Standard sort it would have to be from a time far in the future from the construction of the tomb. Which would of course equate to proof of some kind of time travel for it to get there in the first place.

One more thing to interpret:

On the false door are two empty "blocks" (upper left corner) and five blocks to the right of the outer false door... sitting there for what reason?

http://i60.tinypic.com/28i9nvm.jpg


Interpreted as "block code"? See the video I just posted for "block code.

Note: I'm not quite done yet.....going for my second cup of coffee!

Shadowself
12th September 2015, 16:38
So....

Lets revisit Jupiter for a moment and this post:


There's so much LMH inside Jupiter that it transforms the planet into an enormous generator. "A deep layer of liquid metallic hydrogen and Jupiter's rapid rotation (about 10 hours) create a magnetic field 450 million miles long -- the biggest entity in the solar system," says Bolton. Jupiter's magnetosphere can produce up to 10 million amps of electric current, with auroras that light up Jupiter’s poles more brightly than any other planet.

In this thread I've outlined a whole bunch of alignments and lines of sight to Jupiter no?

So what is the significance to that and possible time travel and traversable worm holes?

http://jandeane81.com/threads/7186-6-Degrees-of-Separation-Order-from-Chaos?p=841931022&viewfull=1#post841931022

Enter Kip thorn and expert on wormholes and whose work was expressed in the move Interstellar noting the tesseract and it's dimensions :

The resistance of magnetic flux to gravitational collapse

http://www.its.caltech.edu/~kip/scri...cans/II-11.pdf

So Jupiter creates a magnetic field 450 million miles long? Is this not significant to the dynamics of an Einstein-Rosen Bridge better know as a wormhole?

And what about Aldebaran being center stage in that tomb ceiling?

In Science Aldebaran is know as:

Aldebaran (α Tau, α Tauri, Alpha Tauri)

Aldebaran.... a Tau... also known as Alpha Tau

Alpha:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha

is the first letter of the Greek alphabet. In the system of Greek numerals it has a value of 1. In English, the noun "alpha" is used as a synonym for "beginning", or "first" (in a series), reflecting its Greek roots.

Tau:

Greek letters in math....
(tau)

τ (lower-case) represents:

an interval of time

So Alpha Tau = First Time

First time for what? First time travel and proof of the unproven theorem?

~

Least we not forget the Land of MU....

Noting Astronomical Simulations as the Main Clue: Part 2...Page 6 & 7 of PDF

Aldebaran you say?:


August 10 or August 11 was an important date in the Mataveri calendar. It is possible that the
natives waited for the helical rising of the bright star Pollux (β Geminorum). It happened on August 10 from A.D. 1690 to A.D. 1720, and on August 11 from A.D. 1721 to A.D. 1796. I believe that on that day many warriors and priests met there and at Orongo.

Let us try to decipher them. For example, choose the year A.D. 1775. On December 20 (near the summer solstice) the azimuth of Aldebaran was 339.1° (23:44). On December 21 the azimuth of this star was 322.0° (00:44; the same night for the natives). The azimuth of Canopus was 177.5° (00:31) that night
(Rjabchikov 2010a). It is obvious that the priests-astronomers looked at both stars during that and other nights.

http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1309/1309.6056.pdf


And all those dates aligned with Jupiter as I've presented thus far?

Things they don't want you to know? Let me direct you to the Metropolitan Museum in New York.

On the Wiki page for this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronomical_ceiling_of_Senemut_Tomb

I direct you to the External links where they say:

Metropolitan Museum has a full scan of the ceiling

Well, they may have but funny thing....those images are not available. I've presented probably the only one's you'll be able to find or copies of. FULL SCANS are unavailable as it stands...so to decipher that ceiling from something other than a copied image you would have to go the the site of the tomb and actually take photos to decipher it. This tells me they really don't want people doing that now do they? And why not said the rabbit to Alice?

http://www.metmuseum.org/collection/the-collection-online/search?ft=tomb+of+Senenmut&noqs=true&rpp=30&pg=1

Red pill or blue pill?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=27&v=WANNqr-vcx0

Shadowself
12th September 2015, 16:56
Okay that's about it for today I'll add one more thing (some repeat) and let you digest what I've shared here:



~ Time ~

“I don’t understand you,” said Alice. “It’s dreadfully confusing!”
“That’s the effect of living backwards,” the Queen said kindly:
“it always makes one a little giddy at first—”
“Living backwards!” Alice repeated in great astonishment. “I
never heard of such a thing!”
“–but there’s one great advantage in it, that one’s memory
works both ways.”
“I’m sure mine only works one way,” Alice remarked. “I can’t
remember things before they happen.”
“It’s a poor sort of memory that only works backwards,” the
Queen remarked.

~ Tell 'em a hookah smoking caterpillar Has given you the call ~

~


All right,’ said the Cat; and this time it vanished quite slowly,
beginning with the end of the
tail, and ending with the grin, which remained
some time after the rest of it had gone.
‘Well! I've often seen a cat without a grin,’
thought Alice, ’but a grin without a cat! It’s the
most curious thing I ever saw in my life!’


http://i42.tinypic.com/2ebu26o.jpg

No wonder Alice is surprised. In real life, assuming
that cats do indeed smile, then the smile is a property of
the cat – it makes no sense to think of a smile without a
cat. And this goes for almost all physical properties. The
polarization is a property of a photon, it makes no sense
to have a polarization without a photon. Yet, as we will
show here, in the interesting way of quantum mechanics, a photon polarization may exist where there is no
photon at all. At least this is the story that quantum mechanics tells via pre- and post-selected measurements.

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1202.0631.pdf

We have shown that Cheshire cats have a place in
quantum mechanics – physical properties can be
disembodied from the objects they belong to in a pre- and
post-selected experiment. Although here we have only
presented one example where a photon is disembodied
from its polarization, it should be clear that this effect is
completely general – we can separate, for example the
spin from the charge of an electron, or internal energy
of an atom from the atom itself. Furthermore it is important
to realize that is not just that pointers of well prepared
measuring devices indicate that the properties
are disembodied – any external system which interacts
weakly with the pre- and post-selected system will react
accordingly.
This therefore opens many intriguing questions, both
conceptual and applied ones. First of all, how will
an electron with charge and mass disembodied effect


A nearby electron? In an atom with the internal energy disembodied from the mass, what will the resulting
gravitational field look like? What sort of thermal equilibrium will achieved by a system whose two degrees
of freedom are separated? Furthermore, when considering more than two degrees of freedom, can we separate
them all from each other? Can photons impart angular
momentum to one object while their radiation pressure
is felt by another object?

On the applied side, we may ask whether Cheshire
cats are useful in precision measurements, just as weak
measurements themselves have now shown to be useful
as a powerful amplification technique .

Suppose​

for example that we wish to perform a measurement​

in which the magnetic moment plays the central role,​

whilst the charge causes unwanted disturbances. Using
this scheme it would appear possible to remove this disturbance, in a post-selected manner (i.e. heralded), by
producing a Cheshire cat where the charge is confined
to a region of the experiment far from the magnetic moment.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=205&v=ooLby5mluRo

Dreamtimer
12th September 2015, 18:13
By the time I've ingested this properly I'll have created even more pathways and fuzzy dendrites!

Shadowself
30th September 2015, 13:30
Wow...did I break the brain circuit? Well perhaps my brain circuit is broken! Yeah....That's the ticket. It's just me seeing something that is not there.

Icam88?

I'll leave you with this to contemplate.

Mind you I did not write this but it goes so nicely with this thread and I could not resist.

Stargate
Making Star Trek Real
Jack Sarfatti
Internet Science Education Project
Foreword

“The future, and the future alone, is the home of explanation.”
Henry Dwight Sedgwick

“Sarfatti's Cave is the name I'll give to the Caffe Trieste in San Francisco, where Jack Sarfatti, Ph.D. in physics, writes his poetry, evokes his mystical, miracle-working ancestors, and has conducted a several-decade-long seminar on the nature of reality … to a rapt succession of espresso scholars. ... It's Jack Sarfatti against the world, and he is indomitable. …One of his soaring theories is that things, which have not happened, yet can cause events in the present. … Cornell University B.A. , University of California Ph.D., his credentials are impeccable. Following is a quotation from a Lecture given to a San Francisco State physics seminar on 30 April 1991:

CAUSALITY VIOLATING QUANTUM ACTION AT A DISTANCE
By Dr. Jack Sarfatti

The universe is created by intelligent design but the Designer lives in our far future and has evolved from us … Perhaps, all the works of cultural genius, from the music of Mozart to the physics of Einstein, have their real origin in the future. The genius may be a real psychic channeler whose mind is open to telepathic messages from the future. The genius must be well trained in his or her craft and intellectually disciplined with the integrity of the warrior in order to properly decode the quantum signals from the future. The purpose of our existence would then be to ensure, not only the creation of life on earth, but also the creation of the big bang itself! We obviously cannot fail since the universe cannot have come into existence without us in this extreme example of Borgesian quantum solipsism [bolstered by John Archibald Wheeler’s “observer-participator” and “the universe as a self-excited circuit]. Existentialism is wrong because it is an incorrect extrapolation of the old physics. Breton’s surrealism, with its Jungian idea of meaningful coincidence, is closer to the truth. This would then be the final secret of the Illuminati – that charismatic chain of adepts in quixotic quest of their ‘Impossible Dream’ of the Grail. Enough of my subjective vision. Now on to the objective physics. Gold, Herbert. Bohemia: Where Art, Angst, Love & Strong Coffee Meet.


Love the last line:

Coffee lust ~ Effect Soul

http://i58.tinypic.com/1zp1tfa.jpg

Cont:

There is now a significant body of results on quantum interactions with closed timelike curves (CTCs) in the quantum information literature, … As a consequence, there is a prima facie argument exploiting entanglement that CTC interactions would enable superluminal and, indeed, effectively instantaneous signaling. …. Using the consistency condition, we show that there is a procedure that allows Alice to signal to Bob in the past via relayed superluminal communications between spacelike-separated Alice and Clio, and spacelike-separated Clio and Bob. This opens the door to time travel paradoxes in the classical domain … offering a possible window on what we might expect in a future theory of quantum gravity. Quantum interactions with closed timelike curves and superluminal signaling, Jeffrey Bub and Allen Stairs, PHYSICAL REVIEW A 89, 022311 (2014)

‘In this case, Bob possesses the unknown state even before Alice implements the teleportation. Causality is not violated because Bob cannot foresee Alice’s measurement result, which is completely random. But, if we could pick out only the proper result, the resulting “projective” teleportation would allow us to travel along spacelike intervals, to escape from black holes, or to travel in time.” Seth Lloyd et-

This is a series of blog essays about teleological destiny, quick time travel to colonize Earthlike exoplanets through stargates, and the possibility that we are three-dimensional hologram images in a virtual reality programmed by a cosmological conscious super-intelligence that is alive and well on our future two-dimensional dark energy edge of space that we can ever hope to see with light signals. My speculative hypothesis-conjecture of this book is that our idea of time and cause and effect is profoundly wrong. In particular the “unproven theorem paradox” of time travel is not a paradox at all.
“The “unproved theorem” paradox points out that if there are CTCs, then it might be possible to take a published proof of a theorem into the past and present it to someone, who then uses it to produce the very manuscript that leads to the theorem’s publication Bub & Stairs op-cit

Evidence on “brain presponse” (Libet, Radin, Bierman, Bem) suggests that our consciousness and creativity are such meme self-creating strange loops. The universe does only not emerge out of the past, but is also pulled toward the future for a purpose. This idea is not new in philosophy, but has reappeared in physics starting with the work of John Archibald Wheeler and Richard Feynman in the 1940s. This back-from-the-future effect is needed to understand the nature of both dark matter and dark energy that is most of the stuff in our accelerating universe and most importantly to understand our own consciousness and how to reach the stars and beyond.


~

If even a small quotient of the above is correct...It's all clear, you were meant to be here!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtGjJVcrKQU&feature=youtu.be

Time travel experiment demonstrates how to avoid the grandfather paradox

http://phys.org/news/2011-03-grandfather-paradox.html

And last for the day since I've apparently lost everyone here I'll add this video to that information and how you say...

Quiff Pop?

Listen to what William Henry says in the first part of this video. The rest is pretty interesting as well.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GA-SXN0O74o&feature=youtu.be

Dreamtimer
30th September 2015, 14:06
You most certainly haven't lost everyone here. It's just taking me a bit of time to keep up. And life is going on which involves much work on the house and some computer issues.

I remain fascinated and attentive. You are causing me to learn more about many things I only knew a tiny bit.

I'll be back for more commentary and perhaps some questions.

lcam88
30th September 2015, 16:47
Sorry Shadowself, I haven't read or absorbed your posts. I'll have a reply soon. And thank you for posting.

Elen
30th September 2015, 16:57
Shadowself, I've been reading your posts as well, and I must say they are compelling and interesting. Love the way that you dig into the Glyphs with no respect or impunity to the main-stream beliefs. I feel for your loss, though, but realises that you are moving on in your life. Great work, unusual and flowing in a natural good way. Good to see you back. Have a Coffee on me, just remember to add lots of water after the coffee.

Elen

lcam88
1st October 2015, 13:52
As I read your posts, I thank you for them so that I may keep track of where I am.

As I was reading the post 128, I couldn't help but think of the word-magic associations (http://jandeane81.com/threads/7431-Don-t-underestimate-the-magic) in another thread. I posted an interesting video of a Poem: Macrometa metaphors (http://jandeane81.com/threads/7431-Don-t-underestimate-the-magic?p=841937265&viewfull=1#post841937265) that examines puns in an interesting way. I see you are using a similar type of examination with syllables and words in your midst.

One that caught my attention coincidentally is: why <=> way

Post 129, keyword: quantum entanglement.


We have shown that Cheshire cats have a place in
quantum mechanics – physical properties can be
disembodied from the objects they belong to in a pre- and
post-selected experiment. Although here we have only
presented one example where a photon is disembodied
from its polarization, it should be clear that this effect is
completely general – we can separate, for example the
spin from the charge of an electron, or internal energy
of an atom from the atom itself. Furthermore it is important
to realize that is not just that pointers of well prepared
measuring devices indicate that the properties
are disembodied – any external system which interacts
weakly with the pre- and post-selected system will react
accordingly.
This therefore opens many intriguing questions, both
conceptual and applied ones. First of all, how will
an electron with charge and mass disembodied effect


A nearby electron? In an atom with the internal energy disembodied from the mass, what will the resulting
gravitational field look like? What sort of thermal equilibrium will achieved by a system whose two degrees
of freedom are separated? Furthermore, when considering more than two degrees of freedom, can we separate
them all from each other? Can photons impart angular
momentum to one object while their radiation pressure
is felt by another object?

Firstly, it is possible to polarized a photon in 1D (the point). This is different and distinct from horizontal, vertical or any other 2D reference. In fact the physics behind modern 3D movies exploits this. A right spin, or a left spin. That would mean that what we know of as a photon moment in 1D is actually existing in at least 2D. A location and a spin. You can then extend that to billions of photons, all of them creating a kaleidoscope type effect in the moments as each exists also as a moment of spin.

It may even make sense to say that spin defines an aspect, perhaps a reference frame, for each photon. Saying it in a different way, such a frame of reference is based on the space around an electron, photon or object. Going back to my interpretation of Schrodinger's cat experiment, suppose it does not mean to say anything about parallel universes, but suppose it means to say that aspects of quantum state (whether entangled or not) also supports a state where some aspect of the state is undefined. In Schrodingers experiment, atomic decay is 50% possible and its effect on the cat is undefined insofar as you may observe that experiment; observation being defined as a quantum state of the experiment that is entangling with your (the observers) quantum state as described by your interaction with it.

And as we look upon everything there is around us; we are not aware of spin polarities of the photons that are detected by our eyes, much less are we aware of spin states of materials in our midst. It is known that mass is mostly empty space, but we cannot be sure whether the effects of that mass is so drastic as to influence all the space in its midst or whether the midsts has conditions that give rise to the appearance of mass. The causality of the motions and energy may indeed be undefined in the interaction with us. Perhaps an equilibrium in some type of oscillation may be considered... But when we reexamine the meaning of Shrodingers cat experiment, we may also accept that the presence of mass does not _need_ to be defined, we may accept that only the space need be defined in a way where the possibility of mass being present is favorable.

It gives credence to an idea that inertia is not an effect of mass, but the space that mass occupies. IE the presumption that inertia caused by mass is at least challenged.

This all because the spin of a local "system", or moment, occupies space and creates a divide where the reference frame of that space is different from the surroundings; within that reference frame the rules are different from the surrounding space. Lastly, why should the passage of time, a charge, or even the forces that appear be different from mass in its relationship to the reference frame?

Shadowself, perhaps a worthy assumption to be challenged is whether material and objects being measured are really worthy of focus. Maybe it is more important to focus on the motions and energies at play in the space around materials and objects? Would that reveal new meaning in the materials you are sharing?

Shadowself
1st October 2015, 15:31
Well Icam88 good to hear from you finally.

The conclusion I recently suggested: Posts numbered 125 thru 129 cannot be singled out by only one post such as 129. That is but an aspect of the entire subject matter.

Oh I said matter...LOL


~

quantum (plural: quanta) is the minimum amount of any physical entity involved in an interaction. Behind this, one finds the fundamental notion that a physical property may be "quantized".

A photon is a single quantum of (visible) light as well as all other forms of electromagnetic radiation and can be referred to as a "light quantum". The energy of an electron bound to an atom is quantized, which results in the stability of atoms, and hence of matter in general.

To delve into the subject matter of time travel and avoiding the paradox for the "first time" "Alpha Tau" as suggested in that series of posts above is what I've proposed. To uncover the code is what is key here at the moment or it means absolutely nothing and I'm completely wrong. But the amount of work I've done so far has told me otherwise. I will find it!...when I do I will publish it.

So to the proposed questions asserting your questions regarding one aspect of Number 129 and the entanglement aspects of a wormhole let me share this:

"Electric fields can thread a classical Einstein-Rosen bridge. Maldacena and Susskind have recently suggested that in a theory of dynamical gravity the entanglement of ordinary perturbative quanta should be viewed as creating a quantum version of an Einstein-Rosen bridge between the particles, or a “quantum wormhole.”

They have demonstrate within low-energy effective field theory that there is a precise sense in which electric fields can also thread such quantum wormholes. Defined a nonperturbative “wormhole susceptibility” that measures the ease of passing an electric field through any sort of wormhole.

The susceptibility of a quantum wormhole is suppressed by powers of the gauge coupling relative to that for a classical wormhole but can be made numerically equal with a sufficiently large amount of entangled matter."

So...If I have actually found the unproven paradox as a success of the First time/Alpha Tau respectively; and you have asked this:

Maybe it is more important to focus on the motions and energies at play in the space around materials and objects? Would that reveal new meaning in the materials you are sharing?


Ahhhh....yes. It's a great deal to to with focus and motion. A wormhole 'spins'. We are sitting right now in a galaxy that spins...within that galaxy we are in a solar system that is in spin within that galactic spin. We are on a planet that spins in a solar system that is spinning within a galaxy that is spinning. So yes....that would be a focal point. Remember in the coffin texts on one of these pages here I wrote and it's quoted within the Coffin Texts: "My power is on the horizon". The horizon would be the edge of the black hole within the center of the galaxy. Least we not forget we are sitting in a "space time vortex" which has been proven.

How do we gauge time? By the spin of our planet. Is time different by large objects such as the Great Pyramid? Yes. Drag on time is what this amounts to. So to answer your questions. YES! Motion is key to discovering the secrets of TIME and the possibility to travel in either direction. ie; past or future.

I hope this answers your question sufficiently. But make no mistake ...Entanglement is part of the equation.

ps; you know I have the utmost respect for your input here. ;)

Shadowself
1st October 2015, 16:05
Oh after rereading my post there it was posts number 125 thru 129 doh! I repaired it. But that is pretty important to what I just posted.

lcam88
1st October 2015, 16:39
Indeed Shadowself.

<snip off-topic/>

Shadowself
2nd October 2015, 14:49
Man I should get a bike!

Whoa....ICAM88...You're right on it and SO close it's not even wrong! I don't know of Bashar or his craft....but you talk about the Qubit. That is.........Operations on pure qubit states suggest there are various kinds of physical operations that can be performed on pure qubit states.

An important distinguishing feature between a qubit and a classical bit is that multiple qubits can exhibit quantum entanglement. Entanglement is a nonlocal property that allows a set of qubits to express higher correlation than is possible in classical systems.

Entanglement is a necessary ingredient of any quantum computation that cannot be done efficiently on a classical computer. Many of the successes of quantum computation and communication, such as quantum teleportation and superdense coding, make use of entanglement, suggesting that entanglement is a resource that is unique to quantum computation.

Now I took that information straight from Wiki. And here is the thing:

I want to make this VERY clear. I am not suggesting that someone physically traveled back in time to produce that ceiling in the tomb. What I AM SUGGESTING is INFORMATION was transferred via quantum teleportation using wormhole physics to transport that information and produce that information in a tomb. Now they could have used and i think this is VERY possible holographic technology to convey this information to whoever produced this tomb back in time. Containing the code and information to produce this ALPHA TAU/FIRST TIME information transfer via quantum teleportation which is VERY 100% possible. What is not proven possible is transferring this information back in time hence using the unproven paradox as a first time transfer.

Here is a layman's version:

http://lightlike.com/teleport/

In that link they talk about is it possible to physically time travel a human being. Personally I think its quite possible but I don't suggest this in the tomb. Again what I AM suggesting is information transfer that is published on a ceiling as proof of the unproven paradox. I just have to decode it. I am very close because and I will repeat here:

In ancient Egyptian this is the letter N:

http://i40.tinypic.com/vnlf7n.jpg

Three of them make the word for water:

http://i40.tinypic.com/vnlf7n.jpg
http://i40.tinypic.com/vnlf7n.jpg
http://i40.tinypic.com/vnlf7n.jpg

There has been much speculation about the constellation represented by four stars encircled by an ovoid


http://i59.tinypic.com/5x2ali.jpg

This block is what is termed the WATERMARK.

In cryptography, a watermarking attack is an attack on disk encryption methods where the presence of a specially crafted piece of data (e.g., a decoy file) can be detected by an attacker without knowing the encryption key.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watermarking_attack

http://theory.stanford.edu/~mikeym/papers/SecureQIM.pdf

And this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Initialization_vector

Suffice it to say if this has "watermark encryption"....

As the blind guy said in the movie Contact: "there's a whole lot more here". He was basically discovering a digital "image" with "sound".

Which would be the primary reason to ideally decode this IN the tomb with a computer at hand.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_teleportation

And the Qubit:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qubit

So you see, and I admit I could be wrong.... it is with great impunity using mainstream science I suggest there is computer code in this tomb. ;)

Shadowself
2nd October 2015, 15:13
Oh yeah....one more thing.

http://i59.tinypic.com/5x2ali.jpg


here you not only have a Watermark...you have 4 stars.

Three dimensions and a fourth. What is the fourth dimension?



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time





Time is a measure in which events can be ordered from the past through the present into the future, and also the measure of durations of events and the intervals between them. Time is often referred to as the fourth dimension, along with the three spatial dimensions.

For your entertainment Teleportation and Holograms


https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=231&v=D4xLxWzsvFA

lcam88
2nd October 2015, 16:21
<snip off-topic />

Regarding

http://i59.tinypic.com/5x2ali.jpg

Perhaps the star inside the 3 ovals is an "inner" star. The singularity perhaps (ref I have very specific ideas about the singularity and how they relate to black holes, our realm). Or perhaps the mind?

I understand a structure of a molecule (http://www.svpwiki.com/tiki-index.php?page=Molecule) according to SVP to be composed of 3 energetic envelopes. Even as the diagrams on the link suggest the envelops to be circular, they are much more likely to be elliptical, I think.

The egg shape is also not coincidental. The man who described the molecule above used that shape in resonant cavities in some of his instruments. The electro-magnetic space propulsion device apparently uses such a shape; it has special qualities as they apply to wave forms. In that light, if that "inner" star is indeed the singularity, those three concentric egg shaped lines might represent the "Veil" that separates...

Lastly, it is not clear to me from the image, whether that inner star is exactly centered in the ovals. If it is not, maybe consideration of implications of the 36 72 72 triangle as Joanna is sharing in her thread might be interesting.

I know my comments here are not really aligned with your rational, but while we are examining curiosities...

I think I need to go back and re-read your earlier postings so that my comments might be less tangential.

<snip off-topic/>

May I ask how you can be so sure military grade computer encryption is a component of what you see and understand in the materials of ancient Egypt?

EDIT

So you say mention a watermark. Watermark attack requires being able to write something [to the encrypted block] later recognizable through the cipher. Do you know what that watermark data happens to be?

PS Sanitized. Am I still off-topic?

Shadowself
2nd October 2015, 17:09
I don't have much time as I'm off to work here in a few minutes but I want to clarify something yet again.


The reason I am not rationalizing encryption technology in the meanings of all of this Shadowself, is mainly because I do not see the ancients to require such a thing. Our capacity to know what there is to know is limited by our ability to perceive and observe order in our midst. True knowledge may be placed in front of an individual and be absolutely meaningless for many reasons (context, knowledge references, focus...). If the paintings are meant to reveal, they will reveal only a reflection of who and what we are at the moment. Why <=> way contemplation above.

May I ask how you can be so sure military grade computer encryption is a component of what you see and understand in the materials of ancient Egypt?

Please don't mistake my possible finding of encryption from sometime in the future with anything to do the "ancients" of Egypt.

While 18th century Egypt was a long time ago....it's not what I would consider the Ancients of Egypt. If you take a look at the Great pyramid and certain various other sites they are MUCH older and more ancient than that of many of the Pharaohs and their respective dynasties. While they certainly leave clues which I've eluded to and could very well expand on that has nothing to do with find encryption in this particular tomb which again I do not consider ancient in those terms.

Far from it. I believe that the Great Pyramid was there long before most of these dynasties and that those dynasties have been built around them and their findings at the time. Such go the various cults that were established giving them great detail in such ancient findings of their own. Again I don't have the time right now to expand this but be assured this tomb was build long after the Ancients of Egypt and their greatly advanced knowledge. Two completely different things to examine and this is not the result of anything of Ancient descendant. I have to run now but will return to discuss later.

lcam88
2nd October 2015, 19:34
Please pardon me if I irked you.

I presumed the materials you are presenting are a bit older than the 18th century. Something from the future you say.

You have me waiting to read you later posting... later.

Shadowself
3rd October 2015, 03:28
Please pardon me if I irked you.

I presumed the materials you are presenting are a bit older than the 18th century. Something from the future you say.

You have me waiting to read you later posting... later.

Oh sorry if it sounded like you irked me. That was not the case at all. I was just in a hurry and running a bit late but I wanted to give that answer and of course I meant 18 dynasty not century...LOL

I just got home from work but sometime tomorrow I will try to explain better why it is that I and others who have studied this tomb find it a bit off. There are things about it and that star map that just don't make sense. Particularly the Standing man which I'll talk about tomorrow.

Outlander
3rd October 2015, 03:35
Oh sorry if it sounded like you irked me. That was not the case at all. I was just in a hurry and running a bit late but I wanted to give that answer and of course I meant 18 dynasty not century...LOL

I just got home from work but sometime tomorrow I will try to explain better why it is that I and others who have studied this tomb find it a bit off. There are things about it and that star map that just don't make sense. Particularly the Standing man which I'll talk about tomorrow.
Hi darling, hope you're doing fine...

Shadowself
3rd October 2015, 03:43
Hi darling, hope you're doing fine...

Hay you! I'm good...tired just got off work...argh!

Outlander
3rd October 2015, 03:45
Hay you! I good...tired just got off work...argh!

This might cheer you up - New Years Eve in Paris, 1968...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVjzPqcdHXQ

Shadowself
3rd October 2015, 03:58
Okay first thing I want to point out is this....

http://i62.tinypic.com/29o4g7l.jpg

http://i60.tinypic.com/33f8dp2.jpg

http://www.eng.utah.edu/~nmcdonal/Tutorials/EncryptionResearchReview.pdf

So if you were going to leave a coded message from the future you would definitely want to leave it before this period of 1900 B.C. right?

That tomb was before the advent of such cryptography in Egypt during the reign of Hatshepsut in 1473 B.C.

The tomb was discovered during the 1925-1927 excavations. So you have a discovery year to work with here and you have a time when Cryptography was not in use. Perfect for such an experiment.

Tomorrow I will go over in great detail what is wrong with this tomb by the who have researched it.




This might cheer you up - New Years Eve in Paris, 1968...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVjzPqcdHXQ


Listening now! Thanks!

lcam88
4th October 2015, 15:37
Substitution and encoding are quite different from encryption Shadowself.

The above text substituted by rot13:

Fhofgvghgvba naq rapbqvat ner dhvgr qvssrerag sebz rapelcgvba Funqbjfrys.

It may be properly encrypted with the following command line:


echo 'Substitution and encoding are quite different from encryption Shadowself.' | openssl enc -aes128 -e -k Shadowself -a

we get


U2FsdGVkX1/KTlLL3p3dIXeXQ44gcA/BpEABeEQra9IGfqTWc34I6XsEL923Li6f
koPM+Mk2JgtqV0qD9FW5BtKPSEuVBoRbohZfnFYYb7ibsoVoS9 AxC5SjAFujckwK

We are using the aes128 encryption algorithm with the password "Shadowself" and encrypted output is base64 encoded. It is impossible to represent binary data output from aes128 cipher in this post without a text representation. So binary data needs to be hex, base32 or base64 encoded, something normal when character based medium is required for the final representation/rendering of binary data.

You an decrypt the output with the following command.


echo 'U2FsdGVkX1/KTlLL3p3dIXeXQ44gcA/BpEABeEQra9IGfqTWc34I6XsEL923Li6f
koPM+Mk2JgtqV0qD9FW5BtKPSEuVBoRbohZfnFYYb7ibsoVoS9 AxC5SjAFujckwK' | openssl enc -aes128 -d -k Shadowself -a

To examine possible watermark attack possibilities with aes128 let's encrypt a 128 character string of space characters. With a defined salt value 0:


echo ' ' | openssl enc -aes128 -e -k Shadowself -a -S 0


U2FsdGVkX18AAAAAAAAAADUuzFK+PvZ+2jG8AeNJTVGAbFHNpg JihHHCkSAFKZPr
OEivCe0FT4sWdu/v0ENGp/ZPaF1wd1GiEaDfm3rqxEhsO7rpBNv5iCskls4KrBHL
2Aql/u2pHLbmBNkWvEKJXc9EZKpiV2o/D62Wl8pTCojzUaTxgkUb1/KMoKp+JSPV
IBJDEMlGTqzX+S8DTwsc2A==

As part of our watermark test, we will subsitute the letter A for the first character.

echo 'A ' | openssl enc -aes128 -e -k Shadowself -a -S 0


U2FsdGVkX18AAAAAAAAAAN6Y6HvVrFfCtCgmsoAnvYMyI73Rui hKB7dWrFXy5NBe
gUn7TpFw3QE9sWAJhITg9zHNtBxTnelupyLXr/RlPSNvtPnELfjd/fC4l1FQG3FF
C5xKeoD1YaWDx8c7Il1uBxGsBO5Qp7OWVZkXMy/lvDEObaNHmSpJWQYlIoIaOQUB
BAvdX9XDwz7iXGoGfS3DKQ==

And then the second character...


echo ' A ' | openssl enc -aes128 -e -k Shadowself -a -S 0


U2FsdGVkX18AAAAAAAAAAMsr/WMQmLSrcuZFid5vZYznrpaO5Udu4o/qXHedu/jw
guLoHu9zwp9j9Hk05v4rzUmNgNFRhfids9ANP0kiKuZIfvbbuY vawBPhP1qR8pw4
CXqh1fdux3cVX8OLXMU5xsxWTV4Ms2Iu5LuzrmnGmVnp5M3BFz ur4DEKDV4mDzVy
hi6l+eGE1PlzZP9T2KxF8A==

As you can see, shifting the data one character results in all data elements after the data "header" to be altered. There is no indication that the input data being encrypted was so similar, rather, one cannot deduce much about the original data much less whether or not watermark data exists. Perhaps we may only be able to deduce that input data was "small" or 128 characters.

If you do not pass the -S 0 parameter defining the random number generator "salt" value, one would see completely different encrypted data even when encrypting the same data. The salt value would be encoded in the "header" and perhaps retrievable. But even with the salt data known (as in my example above) aes128 does not appear to be very vulnerable to a watermark attack.

You can see that encryption is way more sophisticated than character or phrase translations or substitutions.

http://i62.tinypic.com/29o4g7l.jpg

The above image, if the 3 representations are very common, they would serve as a means to compress, abbreviate or contract the expanded data representation by substituting it with a form that has fewer glyphs. In the english language this type of construction is common in both written and spoken phrases.

can not => can't
they will => they'll
of the clock => o'clock

corporation => corp.
mister => mr.
incorporated => inc.
copyright => ©

We have many area specific substitutions.

Deoxyribonucleic acid => DNA
internal combustion engine => ICE

And with the modern day of the internet where everyone is trying to type less:

Be right back => BRB
Oh my god => OMG
laugh my a55 off => LMAO

The list goes on and on; so to suppose you have encryption is way more specific than contracted or abbreviated expression. Way more than character substitutions (rot13), or data encoding (binary vs base64).

If you really mean examine your information as encrypted data:

The first step would be transpose the information in the image into a format that is more easily manipulated by a computer.
Whether you interpret the glyphs to be characters (phonetics) or words/ideas you will need a mapping from those character representations to a binary representation since that is what our computers manipulate.

If you establish another system of manipulation that is not based on binary manipulations, then the rules of that system must be completely defined. This hypothesis suggests that either the information systems from the future that encoded/encrypted your data is not binary, but perhaps based on some future google defined word vectoring fundamental, or that the data is not from the a future where our computing architecture was functional and accessible.

Shadowself
4th October 2015, 16:01
Okay I could probably fill several pages with evidence that this tomb was tampered with in such a way as to convey the message I assert is here.

Starting with the dig:

Here is the first excavation. In it you see the attempt to seal it off with a thick wall. But the top is open upon excavation. Now that may not seem so strange but the time it had to be opened was before a huge pile of clay chips were deposited in front of the entrance which were from tomb 71 Senemuts other tomb. You see Senemut had two tombs. One was more of a funerary tomb which was meant for burial. However they never found a mummy there as I'm aware. That would be tomb # 71. It's tomb 353 this is in question here.


http://i57.tinypic.com/1zzji2v.jpg

When Dr Peter F. Dorman who is a renowned Egyptologist and epigrapher, philologist was doing his thesis on this dig he first of all found that the records of the dig were almost non existent. In other words missing. This dig was commissioned by the NY Metropolitan Museum of art by Herbert Winlock the person in charge of this dig would have kept daily records of the dig. They are just gone. Disappeared. However he did write a book on the dig and there is where it gets strange...because all that is there is Winlock's after the fact assertions. Which Peter F Dorman brings into great question while giving Winlock great props for the find.

You see in Dr. Dorman's thesis he (who knows a great deal about deciphering Hieroglyphs) has about 40 pages on Chamber A (the chamber with the astronomical ceiling) and has worked to decipher them. The problem is it was not easy and he asserts very often two main problems:

1) The walls around this chamber are filled with "mistakes". ie from his thesis:

http://i58.tinypic.com/212bxy0.jpg

......."N" is missplaced?

But that's not all. In this forty pages of a 284 page thesis/ turned book....he makes several distinct notes which make the wall of this chamber even stranger.

2) the hieroglyphs are "mixed' with Hieratic Script which was painted and added on to the "carved" scripts around the walls. Which as I think you might remember I asserted in earlier posts that around the false door would probably contain the actual coded message. Now Hieratic Script is not found on the walls of tombs. Let alone mixed with standard Hieroglyphs.

But that's not all. There are distinct "changes" noted by several scholars who've worked to figure out this chamber. None of which make sense.

From two different sources first one Dr Dorman asserts on the "water mark"....

http://i62.tinypic.com/vylhs.jpg

The sixth cluster is out of place indeed!

but he also asserts on the writing in that cluster:

http://i61.tinypic.com/nprhqt.jpg

In the 40 pages of decyphered texts on the wall and ceiling he as several times admitted it's been "hacked". Unusual term indeed considering my asserts.

But he is not the only one to notice the hacking of the Standing Man. Here is his assertion using the term Hacked:

http://i59.tinypic.com/2cx9v7b.jpg

Now, just so you know around the walls of that chamber is the Book of the Dead and it's been massively hacked with painted Hieratic Script. In fact here is some of that script painted on and they are dates.

http://i59.tinypic.com/23ux2f7.jpg

Of course Dr. Dorman is not going to write a thesis and assert this has been hacked from someone in the future right? But I am convinced it is because of the massive inconstant things within that ceiling and the walls that surround it. Not one person who has studied this tomb can make sense of the placement within that ceiling. Even Dr. Dorman asserts they "made mistakes" and he greatly attempts to make sense of it. Which I've turned around and flatly disagree with. One would be assertion on the two turtles of which his explanation makes absolutely no sense at all.

So I don't know encryption or cryptography but I know there is something here and it's starts with "N". Take it form there folks............

lcam88
4th October 2015, 16:19
Or M - manipulated.

This story appears to be another reoccurrence of an old scheme that Elen goes into in her examinations of megaliths. We have old texts that are translated, a tragic fire that destroys the originals leaving only the translation now incontestable. OR alterations to make a 3 appears to be an 8, or interpretations thereof that misplace events in the historic timeline...

Shadowself, if indeed the information was encrypted, and nobody was able to make much of what it meant, then such manipulations would be unnecessary. Making these efforts to obfuscate some information found requires that a decision to hide the discovery had to have been made. The discovery being, some revelation that would otherwise be easily understood.

Shadowself
4th October 2015, 16:32
Or M - manipulated.

This story appears to be another reoccurrence of an old scheme that Elen goes into in her examinations of megaliths. We have old texts that are translated, a tragic fire that destroys the originals leaving only the translation now incontestable. OR alterations to make a 3 appears to be an 8, or interpretations thereof that misplace events in the historic timeline...

Shadowself, if indeed the information was encrypted, and nobody was able to make much of what it meant, then such manipulations would be unnecessary. Making these efforts to obfuscate some information found requires that a decision to hide the discovery had to have been made. The discovery being, some revelation that would otherwise be easily understood.

That may be ...but the Book of the Dead is very common. Hacking it with Hieratic Script is NOT common. In fact several times in those 40 plus pages he notes the misplacement of N. The fact that it was hacked into and painted upon the carved hieroglyphs of a common theme such as the Book of the Dead is also key. Many of the words were changed and don't again make sense as to the content.

As I state the Book of the Dead is very common and no great secrets to erase or change there. Which of course makes this even more interesting.

Shadowself
4th October 2015, 16:51
Note: Here is one of the walls containing the Book of the Dead. Each one of those vertical lines of script contain carved and painted script of a different nature. One Hieroglyph the other painted on Hieratic. Now of course it's hard to see given the shadow of the photograph but it's been noted as there.

If you were to take each one of those lines and extact the Hieratic script perhaps there you'll find the coded unproven theorem.

http://i59.tinypic.com/21eb05f.jpg

And oh yeah.... I added this view of one of the walls because that sure looks like the mouth of a wormhole to me. But of course that is actually the passage to the underworld.

Shadowself
4th October 2015, 17:50
Here is a good example given by Dr Dorman of the N misplacement painted on.....From Liturgy 7 of the Book of the Dead texts upon those walls in chamber A:

http://i58.tinypic.com/1054r2q.jpg

Ho Osiris N?...N? Really? And it's painted on?

And then there is this....

Same wall:

http://i60.tinypic.com/k17xvk.jpg

Shadowself
4th October 2015, 18:04
Here is one more example of the Extraneous (in his own words) N:

http://i62.tinypic.com/1zn5t3s.jpg

Today's lesson is brought to you by...LOL:

http://i60.tinypic.com/15ohw6u.jpg

lcam88
19th September 2016, 14:43
Shadowself,

It's been a while and a half. How is everything?

I just found these interpretations of Ancient Egyptian understandings and as I am going through it, I am reminded me of your endeavor here on this thread.

I wonder if the subject of biogeometry as elaborated by Dr Ibrahim Karim (http://www.biogeometry.ca/dr-ibrahim-karim) is somehow related. Maybe?

The suave intro:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OS8XMWFn1k
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OS8XMWFn1k

And to get more into the meat of it:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfFBW1te54c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfFBW1te54c

Dreamtimer
14th February 2018, 12:23
Keep going guys!

No wrong answers here. All taken into consideration. I'll be reading here for a few days. Then over the weekend I'll continue on.

Thanks for the great reply so far!

Consider this: Six degrees of separation...and Chaos. What's the connection?

Remember...no wrong answers here.

I'll leave this to ponder:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rzxAyY7D7k

Enjoy!

This thread is a treasure trove, literally. Six degrees of separation, closed timeline-like curves, computers in ancient Egypt, stars and constellations, the number 42 and more.

I'm reviewing it both because of its excellence and because of Brook's current state. I want people to see the scope of her mind and contributions. We're lucky to have her around.

Dreamtimer
15th February 2018, 19:33
The above video started with the "new science of networks" and I've been thinking about mycelium and the stunning network it creates.

This next post is rich and I just love semiotics. :love: (I think)



Good golly miss Molly!

http://i62.tinypic.com/2rra23a.jpg

“You’ve got randomness, and you’ve got order. And right between them, you’ve got the phase transition,”

'The idea is, you want to get as close as possible to chaos, but you don't want to go into the chaos.'

Dedicated to Chaos ~ Getting Started


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gc3GkxqCPks&feature=youtu.be

A phase transition is the transformation of a thermodynamic system from one phase or state of matter to another

Thriving on the Edge of Chaos

http://i61.tinypic.com/29nbdqc.jpg

~

They say a picture is worth a thousand words:

Osiris/Orion

http://i57.tinypic.com/2w33rph.jpg

Bio chemical substance/process produced by the body ~ Without it, well...death would be imminent.

http://i59.tinypic.com/16c1b3a.jpg

Compare the images. Turn one sideways to see the similarity.

So what is that image of?

That's a Glucose transporter (hunter) titled

Beta-D-Glucose which starts the

Gluconeogenesis Pathway consisting of a series of "eleven" enzyme-catalyzed reactions.

In humans the main gluconeogenic precursors are lactate, glycerol, alanine and glutamine.

Glucose is the human body's key source of energy.

Glucose is a primary source of energy for the brain, so its availability influences psychological processes. When glucose is low, psychological processes requiring mental effort (e.g., self-control, effortful decision-making) are impaired.

~

Lactose is a disaccharide sugar derived from galactose and glucose that is found in milk.

Infant mammals nurse on their mothers to drink milk, which is rich in lactose. The intestinal villi secrete the enzyme called lactase (β-D-galactosidase) to digest it. This enzyme cleaves the lactose molecule into its two subunits, the simple sugars glucose and galactose, which can be absorbed. Since lactose occurs mostly in milk, in most mammals, the production of lactase gradually decreases with maturity due to a lack of constant consumption.

http://i61.tinypic.com/szd30y.jpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glucose_transporter

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glycogenolysis

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluconeogenesis

http://youtu.be/JywK_5bT8z0

But that's just silly no?

I suppose we will never know for certain as the library and knowledge in Alexandria was burned to the ground.

~

So what have I just provided in the images here?

The "hour glass" shape of Orion and "hour glass" shape of Glucose have a similarity. But the connotation is different. One is a pattern in the stars. One is a molecular structure of glucose.

That's a symbol of visual semiotics.

Double meanings?

Check it:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6zTvrGirfg&feature=youtu.be

Signs can hypnotize no?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZeTlMpnfHk

And so it begins...

Dreamtimer
19th February 2018, 13:37
Very nice Mist.

I think...no I'm certain that like I said earlier there are no wrong answers here. What I'm about to share here.... will be something for everybody to enjoy and ponder of a deeper meaning. It doesn't matter who you are or what you believe. It will manage to connect in a big way. Of this I'm certain. It doesn't even matter how you interpret it. It will have some kind of match to something bigger than what we presume via this thing called Perception.

So, my next post is going to start with a fair amount of measurements. Did I say measurements?

Yes I did....imaging that.

While I'm retrieving some data I have shared before allow me to share some other connotations. I do hope you got a chance to watch the video on Visual Semiotics....it's important to be able to follow what is about to be presented. In fact everything I present here up to and including some pretty heady physics papers will be important. But you don't have to understand all the Math....because the math is quite simple. And math is what you're about to see a great deal of here. I will make it quite simple...so simple you can use a basic dime store calculator and do it yourself. The intricate math and physics is simply the validation to adhere what it's all about. You can read it if you wish and gain a fair amount of understanding without doing the math yourself. But it is actually important to add and back up the data I'm about to share here.

Easy peasy!


Enjoy:

Connotations...

A flower:

The Egyptian Blue Lily
http://i39.tinypic.com/25akx20.jpg

Connotation:
http://i57.tinypic.com/2wck8r4.jpg

Door:
http://i57.tinypic.com/25zm6np.jpg

Egyptian connotation (False door):
http://i41.tinypic.com/2czrrq8.jpg

Chromosome:
http://i40.tinypic.com/2nr1toi.jpg

Isis Knot/Blood of Isis (NO! Really???....We'll see.)
http://i42.tinypic.com/2i9goes.jpg

Game:
http://i58.tinypic.com/10dxdsn.jpg

Egyptian game (tug of war):
http://i60.tinypic.com/svi70h.jpg

Tug of war in Egypt? Oh believe me that's an important one!

Hmmmm:scrhd::eyebrows::tea::hmm:

Emil El Zapato
20th February 2018, 01:07
The above video started with the "new science of networks" and I've been thinking about mycelium and the stunning network it creates.

This next post is rich and I just love semiotics. :love: (I think)

Hypnotized ... one of my favorites... :) First time I remember hearing that song I was living in North Carolina for a few months. Listening to that song surely did Hynotize me. I bought it and recorded it to a tape of my favorites... The Division Bell, Chris Rea, and I can't even remember most of them...the performers are on the tip of my brain...

Dreamtimer
24th March 2018, 12:38
So rich. (I think I'm smart until I run into people like Brooke)

I love this sonic geometry video.


First let's start off by measuring sound.

Harmonic Series:

Notice designated numerical value given to f-Sharp

http://i42.tinypic.com/1zzg9z6.jpg

http://i42.tinypic.com/2gy8vsz.jpg

http://i42.tinypic.com/16i8584.jpg

Frequency Wavelength:
http://i40.tinypic.com/107qv51.jpg

Note 11 in Harmonic Series and F-Sharp:

Tom Danley also became interested in the Great Pyramid. Here is an extract from his interview in FATE magazine in 1998.

"In the Great Cheops Pyramid in the King's Chamber an F-sharp chord is resident, sometimes below the range of human hearing. Former NASA consultant Tom Danley feels the sound may be caused by wind blowing cross the ends of the air shafts and causing a pop-bottle effect. These vibrations, some ranging as low a 9 hertz down to 0.5 hertz, are enhanced by the dimensions of the Pyramid, as well as the King's Chamber and the sarcophagus case inside. According to Danley, even the type of stone was selected to enhance these vibrations."

In a 1997 video, JJ Hurtak said "this chord (F-sharp) is the harmonic of planet Earth to which native Americans still tune their instruments, and is in perfect harmony with the human body."

In the Great Pyramid these sounds are infrasonic vibrations, meaning they are below the level of human hearing.

Another researcher, John Reid, an acoustic engineer stated that while he was lying in the coffer and vocalizing various tones he was staggered by the intensity of the reflected energy. He said "the effect of lying in the sarcophagus while toning its prime resonant frequency is almost like taking a bath. Waves of sonic energy wash over your body almost like water".

It does not appear that all this was accidental or incorporated for a burial ritual. It must have had a more important purpose.

While we are on the topic of sound, it is interesting to note that the Grand Gallery seems to be tunable, via it's stepped ceiling construction to four octaves.
The antechamber before the Kings chamber with it's portcullis grooves and granite leaf, is reminiscent of a giant reed, for tuning the cavity.






In music, pitch is the perception of the frequency of a note. For example, the A above middle C is nowadays set at 440 Hz (often written as "A = 440 Hz", and known as concert pitch). Pitch is often cited as one of the fundamental aspects of music.

A Neutron Star in F-sharp:

http://arxiv.org/ftp/astro-ph/papers/0605/0605117.pdf

http://www.world-science.net/othernews/050713_fsharpfrm.htm

Fractal Geometry of Music:

Fractal Geometry and F Sharp.....

Starting with F

Studying the frequency of natural catastrophes, one of us
(K.J.H.) came to realize an inverse log-log linear relation
between the frequency (F) and a parameter expressing the
intensity of the events (M), be they earthquakes, landslides,
floods, or meteorite impacts (2), and the relation can be stated
by the simple equation

F= c/MD.

Only later did we realize that this relation has been called
fractal by Mandelbrot (3), where c is a constant of proportionality
and D is the fractal dimension. Fractal relations have
commonly a lower and an upper limit. In the case of earthquakes,
for example, Eq. 2 holds only for the interval 3 -AM
c 9, because the smallest earthquakes are not represented by
significant statistics, nor is the energy release of large earthquakes
infinite.
Mandelbrot (3) put together certain geometric shapes
whose "monstrous" forms were very irregular and fragmented;
he coined the term fractal to denote them. Those
"monsters" were considered irrelevant to nature, akin to
modern atonal music (4), until Mandelbrot suggested that the
fractal relation could be the central conceptual tool to understand
the harmony of nature.
We have been searching for a meaning of melody. Is it
tradition or convention, or is it an instinctive expression of a
natural law? Could we find a mathematical relation to describe
a melody? Could the music of Bach be mathematically
distinguished from that of Stockhausen? Could we use mathematics
to describe the evolution of music from the primitive
folk's music to the atonal music of today? If music is an
expression of nature's harmony, could music have a fractal
geometry? Which, the atonal or the classical

http://www.pnas.org/content/87/3/938.full.pdf


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TsRuY9UGPd4&feature=youtu.be

Proximity ~ Sending out a code


First the bio of Boris Said ~film maker



Note the findings:



From this source, one of many.

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/piramides/esp_piramide_3.htm


Note:

Below audible (inaudible) range Hertz Noted in this post and the one preceding)

Audible frequency range : generally accepted standard range of audible frequencies is 20 to 20,000 Hz

Frequencies below 20 Hz are generally felt rather than heard, assuming the amplitude of the vibration is great enough.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio_frequency

"They were below the audible range, below 20 Hertz, below 20 vibrations per second.... Down as far as half a vibration per second, or half a Hertz."

11 harmonic series F sharp

(there will be certain notes that sound louder and more resonant to you than other notes)

Proximity:

Pyramidal structure

Granite Chamber (This rock consists mainly of quartz/crystal, mica, and feldspar.)

unpowered radio receivers: A crystal radio receiver

... while other radios use a separate source of electric power such as a battery or the mains power to amplify the weak radio signal from the antenna so it is louder. Thus crystal sets produce rather weak sound and must be listened to with sensitive earphones, and can only pick up stations within a limited range

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_radio


Update: 21ST century

Now you can transmit data to smart devices over inaudible soundwaves

The audio signal, which is inaudible to the human ear, can be broadcasted during a television show, radio broadcast, movie showing, music concert or any other event, and can be received...


technology works by sending out a code as an audio signal from a speaker to any device with a microphone. A companion app provided by Sonic Notify interprets the unique code to deliver the correct content. Everything is based on proximity; once a device gets close enough to the signal, it can receive the data.

Read more at http://venturebeat.com/2012/01/10/sonic … eaYLLgm.99

Handy little app I suppose...but the tech is more relevant to what might seem another type of sonic data delivery system of the ancient sort eh? Which is:

transmitting data over inaudible soundwaves via Crystal/Granite Chamber using 11 harmonic series of F sharp.

So to; using those inaudible soundwaves to get the signal.

Now that's an apparent puzzle eh?

Continuation commencement of "to be continued": perception frequency transmission

And now this to ponder while I gather some other data which eventually led me to the code.

What code? You'll see.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qd92ksKzTKY

Dreamtimer
26th March 2018, 17:56
Our number is up...


Lots of numbers there to ponder in that last video eh?

Some really stick out too.

What about the crystal radio receiver? It's been suggested by many that the top of the great pyramid had in fact a crystal cap and not a gold cap. Interesting no?

So what's all this got to do with 6 degrees of separation and Order from Chaos?

Well....in the video it specifically stated that the Freemasons were particularly fond of certain numbers.

It's also known that "order from Chaos" or better know as "Ordo ab Chao" was the motto of the Freemasons given back in 1395.

So here you have this group that has a definitive leaning toward things of an ancient Egyptian nature and 33 comes into play. An ancient culture that worshiped the sun and measured it's rise and fall to a great degree.

Allow me to show you something most people don't readily know reported by Stanford News.

Measuring Nuclear Decay....

The strange case of solar flares and radioactive elements:


....

Random numbers


Cessium? Check it:


Whoa!

But this really caught my attention!

A surprise



http://news.stanford.edu/news/2010/august/sun-082310.html

Now that's some Sirius Measuring! But wait...where's that code? and what about all those numbers? Coming up....


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ozlo2FOs0Ho

Emil El Zapato
26th March 2018, 19:15
Our number is up...

My daughter introduced me to his music...I love it. Beautiful! He does such soulful music for a happy guy... :) He did a performance on 'Darryl's House'...Really cool, but I've never seen him look so serious.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=es_UqFcxPGM

Aianawa
27th March 2018, 02:21
An amazing thread.

Dreamtimer
27th March 2018, 13:20
It is. I'm looking forward to the video about Egyptian math.

I'm pretty sure the video was Number Nine song by Lennon.


Cryptography:

As it turns out Ancient Egypt was on of the first places to find the early use of Cryptography.

Cryptography is the science or study of techniques of secret writing and message hiding.

The earliest known text containing components of cryptography originates in the Egyptian town Menet.

Note: The ancient Greeks are said to have known of ciphers.

The Rosetta stone was how ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs were deciphered from three languages. One of them and the most prominent for decipherment was Greek.

So as it turns out the greatest help deciphering Ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs was Greek. Not so unusual....but remember the Visual semantics...what you see and what you compute. Is there a cypher and is it cryptography?

What do you suppose John Lennon knew about the number 9 regarding Chaos? A revolution? Or a revelation?

Number 9...number 9...number 9...coming up!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVf5Cr4M-F8

Feeling common and average right now...



Before I get to the cypher and code I want to show you something I may have shared earlier here but it also belongs here...on this thread because it "computes"...it relates to the code and cypher.

So in the midst of my deciphering the code I ran into a video suggested by a friend.

http://i40.tinypic.com/1znbbzk.jpg
Note three times the hieroglyph for Neith is WATER and the primer for the code!

http://i44.tinypic.com/293btrm.jpg

http://i40.tinypic.com/20rwn4i.jpg


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rc5c608C9RY

Whoa! This had interested me for days!

Because I had a pretty healthy knowledge of ancient Egypt I was drawn to this:

The crown

The goddess Neith (left) and Nephthys before dual images of Osiris

http://i41.tinypic.com/28s7rd0.jpg

http://i41.tinypic.com/2rc5ylg.jpg

The approach used to calculate all the quantities of interest in the theory remains old-fashioned perturbation theory, which assumes a reasonable starting point and then tries to home in on the correct result by adding an infinite series of corrections. In quantum electrodynamics, these perturbation corrections were represented by Feynman diagrams, and, on summing up infinite numbers of terms, results of surprising accuracy were achieved. On the other hand, when it came to gravity, the perturbation series failed totally to represent a curved space-time by adding a finite number of corrections to an initially flat space-time. Perturbation theory is often plagued with infinity, and infinite sum (when the coupling constant is not small). Superstrings are supposed to be a theory about gravity and matter. Yet physicists continue to treat them as if they exist in a flat background space-time, a picture they hope will be corrected by using a perturbation series. Clearly this whole approach is inadequate and obscures the power of the superstrings themselves.

M-theory and duality were introduced to overcome the difficulty. Although this approach have yet to give us definitive information about four-dimensional vacua, they have already clarified much of the nonperturbative nature of string theory in 10, 8, and even 6 dimensions, giving us a complex web of dualities between different string compactifications.

http://universe-review.ca/R15-18-string06.htm

http://i42.tinypic.com/122bwa0.jpghttp://i42.tinypic.com/122bwa0.jpg

In mathematics, a duality, generally speaking, translates concepts, theorems or mathematical structures into other concepts, theorems or structures, in a one-to-one fashion, often (but not always) by means of an involution operation: if the dual of A is B, then the dual of B is A. Such involutions sometimes have fixed points, so that the dual of A is A itself. For example, Desargues' theorem in projective geometry is self-dual in this sense.

Many mathematical dualities between objects of two types correspond to pairings, bilinear functions from an object of one type and another object of the second type to some family of scalars. For instance, linear algebra duality corresponds in this way to bilinear maps from pairs of vector spaces to scalars, the duality between distributions and the associated test functions corresponds to the pairing in which one integrates a distribution against a test function, and Poincaré duality corresponds similarly to intersection number, viewed as a pairing between submanifolds of a given manifold.

Duality can also be seen as a functor, at least in the realm of vector spaces.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duality_%28mathematics%29

NOW:

Look at the glyph I posted once again....

Neith: Her name also may be interpreted as meaning water.

Nephthys: goddess of rivers.


http://youtu.be/oxKCPjcvbys

Double vision/double meaning

HINT:

The secret is in the throne....

In linear algebra terms, the dual code is the annihilator of C with respect to the bilinear form <,>. The dimension of C and its dual always add up to the length n:

\dim C + \dim C^\perp = n.

A generator matrix for the dual code is a parity-check matrix for the original code and vice versa. The dual of the dual code is always the original code.

A self-dual code is one which is its own dual. This implies that n is even and dim C = n/2. If a self-dual code is such that each codeword's weight is a multiple of some constant c > 1, then it is of one of the following four types:

Type I codes are binary self-dual codes which are not doubly even.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_code

"Doubly-even self-dual linear binary error-correcting block code


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1LCVknKUJ4&feature=youtu.be

HINT:

The secret is in the throne....look at it closely.

http://i41.tinypic.com/28s7rd0.jpg

Type I codes are binary self-dual codes which are not doubly even.

~

Count the lines in the throne.

~

"Doubly-even self-dual linear binary error-correcting block code"

supersymmetry (SUSY)

~

Throne: Seat of power

(will explain more later)

~

Is everything CODE?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sl6P_cGXEtk&feature=youtu.be

crown of Nephthys (in image above)

Inverted Throne....topped with the NEB

~

http://i43.tinypic.com/x3zlzr.jpg

NEB: "everything", or "all things"

~

Two Goddess' of WATER

Osiris: also a God of Water

https://www.google.com/search?q=osiris+god+of+water&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

~

WATER is the PRIMER in the Code!

Dreamtimer
30th March 2018, 20:20
Saved by zero?


It's been said if there is anybody "out there"...they would communicate with numbers. A universal language?

So I have to tell you I ran into that Sacred Geometry video long after I discovered the code and the numbers. It just fit in so nicely with what I found.

For example this:

432 divided by 9 is 48.

9 x 9 = 81

81 - 48 = 33

Numbers and their series....but to what exactly?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHYIGy1dyd8&feature=youtu.be

Starting off with nine:

In ancient Egypt there were 9 primary gods.

The Ennead (Ancient Greek: meaning a collection of nine things)

http://i41.tinypic.com/10yjs49.jpg

Now depending on the cult in charge at the time you won's see some interesting and popular gods.

Where is Thoth? Ptah? Sekhmet or Hathor?

Where is Neith the one spoken of earlier on in this thread?

In the case of Osiris and Isis...Horus (who is not one of the nine) is born.

Perhaps there's another way to look at these Nine gods.

Perhaps they are principals?

I ran into a scroll. On this scroll was listed nine principals.

Out of these principals are born others...

The first four Principals written were fairly basic Physics.

1) Compression
2) Spin
3) Spark
4) Mass

Now before I get to number five and 6 which was a doozy!!! I'll tell you I've already provided number 7 which was frequency. But I've not shown you how it was used in conjunction with the Pyramid ...yet.

In number 5 & 6 you'll see the god Set/Seth/God of Chaos like you've never seen him before. The corresponding numbers as well.

While I gather more data...for the moment I leave you with the early Pre-Newtonian concepts of measuring Mass and their corresponding Gods :

Scale balances the force of one object's/mass weight against the force of another object's/mass weight.

http://i44.tinypic.com/15otjtk.jpg

Perhaps in all these numbers we'll be saved by zero?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JOiZP8FS5Ww

Dreamtimer
6th May 2018, 14:27
I sure hope Shadowself is still on the mend and feeling better.:priest::wiz::meditating::swing:


Number 5 kicked my butt!

I was so confused at first! Then it all came together...especially with number 6 yet to be revealed!

First off I deciphered:

Divide/Split/Duplicate

It confused the hell out of me. I just could not figure it out. Until....

I turned to my trusty guide Artemis (Anagram:Master I) and a dream I had about number five. Call it a metaphor if you will but it has deep scientific meaning which I will show you.

So I meet up with Artemis and he took me somewhere I've never seen before. I'm placed between a rather long row of stoic men standing shoulder to shoulder. Staring straight forward. Artemis directs me to walk between them. I had no idea what was at the end of this row of men. while walking between the row of men I ask Artemis is this in the past or future. He says "neither, this is now".

I turn the corner and see flashes of light. Flashes of darkness. I ask him what is this you're showing me? He reminds me of the time I had written about "life during wartime" and my statement of Syria a few years ago.

I ask "what's going on here"? he says:

The War of Lights.

I ask him again...what can I do about this? I'm handed a glass of yellow liquid. I ask "what is that"?

You'll find out...it's more than a drink. It's the "Golden Elixir".

Which meant it was far more complicated and I needed to research it.

so he looked me straight in the eye and said...

The 5th: Discretion...

That's a biggie!

The act of discretion encompasses cause and effect as well as free will.

Discretion: the right to choose what should be done in a particular situation

: the quality of being careful about what you do and say

: the quality of having or showing discernment or good judgment

: ability to make responsible decisions

: individual choice or judgment

And so on.

So I proceeded to look up Golden Elixir. To which I fell out of my chair as I was transported far from Egypt!

Jiudan jing...The Book of NINE Elixirs.

Jiuhua dan (Elixir of the Nine Efflorescence's)

Alternative name...Elixir of Great Clarity


Efflorescence: A state or time of flowering; anthesis. A gradual process of unfolding or developing. The deposit that results from the process of efflorescing. Also called bloom.

Jindan : or Golden Elixir

Gold represents the state of constancy and immutability beyond the change and transiency that characterize the cosmos.

Enjoy the reading...I know I did!

PDF here:

http://www.goldenelixir.com/files/Taoist_Alchemy_Historical_Overview.pdf

http://www.goldenelixir.com/files/Book_of_the_Nine_Elixirs_SAMPLE.pdf

Yellow Court Classic

This process of Internal Alchemy doesn't rely on society, environment or any external ingredients.
(according to Jade Emperor's "Mind Sealing Classic", Elixir of Immortality is fully in ourselves, very subtle and neither physical nor intellectual). Transformations start and end (in every cycle) in Oneself, through Oneself, by Oneself. The Alchemy (Divine Chemistry) is an internal Symmetry of the Spiritual Beings, that preserves their awareness and identity through all changes of the temporal world.

http://jadewriting.org/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_Court_Classic

~

Exercising Discretion (number 5) in The Infinite Field of Potential is rather important no?

Relevant theory:

Causality
Domino Effect
Chain Reaction
Actuality and potentiality

Spoken of in the illustrated Sutra of Cause and Effect

http://www.kyohaku.go.jp/eng/dictio/shoseki/50einga.html

And...quite importantly:

The Butterfly Effect which directly correlates to Chaos Theory!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly_effect

On to Number 6 documented in an Ancient Tomb....with all the numbers I've provided so far and the code.

Discretion would certainly encompass a Universal Principal to achieve...dot dot dot... eh?

Emil El Zapato
6th May 2018, 15:33
yeah, this is pretty fascinating stuff...

Nearly infinite variability (Chaos) coalesces into an understandable structure with practically very little when compared to infinity to explain it. If one wants to conquer the Universe master the process... :)

Ah, Shadowself...different personage... :)

enjoy being
7th May 2018, 02:46
There is some accuracy in saved by zero on another level. However 9 Egyptian gods led to a tyranny 9 times greater than a world with 9 people wishing upon their 1.
We did okay to get it down to one. Blood spilled in doing so, but the aim was and will always to be get it down to Zero. Zero idols.
The universe and the forces of creation stay the same, just the worm in the mind gets removed.

Aianawa
13th May 2018, 12:35
How is she mending, anyone heard ?

Dreamtimer
13th May 2018, 22:13
Last I heard a couple weeks ago she said the tumor was shrinking and she was doing better. She was going to start posting something she's been working on. I'm curious, but haven't seen anything yet. I'll go have another look.

Dreamtimer
14th May 2018, 11:19
You're welcome Dreamtimer. I didn't come upon this information and knowledge lightly. In fact I didn't have much of a choice. Of course I could have ignored it but that would have been very hard to do if you knew the history behind how I came upon it.

I became afflicted with this little thing called "time" and a very early age. In fact this tomb I'm about to show you all here is all about...TIME in a big way.

Ramesses II Was Ozymandias

Upon a cash of ancient Egyptian Collections Shelly writes a sonnet.


"I met a traveller from an antique land

Who said: "Two vast and trunkless legs of stone

Stand in the desert. Near them on the sand,

Half sunk, a shattered visage lies, whose frown

And wrinkled lip and sneer of cold command

Tell that its sculptor well those passions read

Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,

The hand that mocked them and the heart that fed.

And on the pedestal these words appear:

`My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings:

Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair!'

Nothing beside remains. Round the decay

Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare,

The lone and level sands stretch far away".

~ Shelly~


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dO1rMeYnOmM

Ozymandias. :hmm:


You know...that six degrees of separation and being connected to this is part of something I simply cannot deny. Nor can Ignore.

It's taken me years of research...Some things along the way I got very wrong. Due to this thing called perception. In fact I gave it a name several years ago and wrote about. I called it the 180 turnaround. It involved perception.

Basically if your physical mind can't comprehend, it fills in with what I called pixels with the next best thing that you CAN comprehend. Kinda like a reference point to the information. If it's not in the biological "mind file" it can only fill in the pixel with what it does know. This is not to be confused with the internal/higher mind and spirit/stir pi of another nature of self. It's about integrating the two levels of information and the pixel "plug in". It's been suggested we already know most of what we search for, it's just not in the data base of the biological mind for review due to the lack of data input in the conscious mind. ie; lack of data/knowledge in the conscious mind.

In that process there's a great chance you can miss something or miss perceive something. I missed some things. Big time back then!

That was back then how I described it and actually saw it.

In that; this time affliction I have is not something I would call a gift. But I've experienced time slips in a big way. Unfortunately most (if not all) of those time slips surrounded death. Now the fact that I have know at a certain point which I've written about extensively and people have witnessed I've actually proven it. No need for any experiment here. Also not surprising I apparently have had a past life in Egypt which is most likely why most of those time slips involved death...as it's no secret the Egyptians again were obsessed with the After life.

After life ~ TIME after death

Now in my research I learned quite a bit. Particularly hieroglyphs. When you see something that has ABSOLUTELY no place in a tomb for the time era it was made...you begin to question it's origins.

Which I did. The tomb in question has plenty of things that in this particular persons tomb make no sense. They do not relate to the deceased AT ALL. Who this person was and why this would be there.

So I'm going to throw some things that relate to this in a big way before I get to it. IF is seems out of place...understand it will connect once I get into the tomb and it's origins and creation.

Time keeps on slippin' slippin' slippin'...

Dreamtimer
1st June 2018, 15:17
Shadowself would like the part around the 30 minute mark and after I think:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vka2ZgzZTvo

Dreamtimer
1st June 2018, 15:34
The Schoch interview also calls to mind this video (https://jandeane81.com/showthread.php/1509-The-Electric-Universe?p=7521&viewfull=1#post7521):


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7EAlTcZFwY

Shadowself
2nd June 2018, 15:10
Last I heard a couple weeks ago she said the tumor was shrinking and she was doing better. She was going to start posting something she's been working on. I'm curious, but haven't seen anything yet. I'll go have another look.

Good Morning!

Yes, I've stumbled onto something key from this thread and subject matter. Problem is I've been too sick to put it into written form yet. I've almost got it done and sorted to help make it a bit easier to understand. What I found/researched is to this thread an amazing find in my mind. Hopefully in the near future I will regain some strength to actually get this done. So keep your eyes open.

Dreamtimer
2nd June 2018, 20:08
I'll be looking forward.

I hope your recovery continues well. :love:

Aianawa
2nd June 2018, 22:20
Xlent, look forward to this Brooke, also say hi to Bill for me if you get the opportunity,good teacher he be.

Dumpster Diver
4th June 2018, 17:28
Good Morning!

Yes, I've stumbled onto something key from this thread and subject matter. Problem is I've been too sick to put it into written form yet. I've almost got it done and sorted to help make it a bit easier to understand. What I found/researched is to this thread an amazing find in my mind. Hopefully in the near future I will regain some strength to actually get this done. So keep your eyes open.

Looking forward to your getting better and further additions to this most excellent thread!

Dreamtimer
29th June 2018, 12:02
I'm praying for Brooke.


You know...that six degrees of separation and being connected to this is part of something I simply cannot deny. Nor can Ignore.

It's taken me years of research...Some things along the way I got very wrong. Due to this thing called perception. In fact I gave it a name several years ago and wrote about. I called it the 180 turnaround. It involved perception.

Basically if your physical mind can't comprehend, it fills in with what I called pixels with the next best thing that you CAN comprehend. Kinda like a reference point to the information. If it's not in the biological "mind file" it can only fill in the pixel with what it does know. This is not to be confused with the internal/higher mind and spirit/stir pi of another nature of self. It's about integrating the two levels of information and the pixel "plug in". It's been suggested we already know most of what we search for, it's just not in the data base of the biological mind for review due to the lack of data input in the conscious mind. ie; lack of data/knowledge in the conscious mind.

In that process there's a great chance you can miss something or miss perceive something. I missed some things. Big time back then!

That was back then how I described it and actually saw it.

In that; this time affliction I have is not something I would call a gift. But I've experienced time slips in a big way. Unfortunately most (if not all) of those time slips surrounded death. Now the fact that I have know at a certain point which I've written about extensively and people have witnessed I've actually proven it. No need for any experiment here. Also not surprising I apparently have had a past life in Egypt which is most likely why most of those time slips involved death...as it's no secret the Egyptians again were obsessed with the After life.

After life ~ TIME after death

Now in my research I learned quite a bit. Particularly hieroglyphs. When you see something that has ABSOLUTELY no place in a tomb for the time era it was made...you begin to question it's origins.

Which I did. The tomb in question has plenty of things that in this particular persons tomb make no sense. They do not relate to the deceased AT ALL. Who this person was and why this would be there.

So I'm going to throw some things that relate to this in a big way before I get to it. IF is seems out of place...understand it will connect once I get into the tomb and it's origins and creation.


You can't get much more creative than this thread, imo. And yet the responses are...not much.

Dreamtimer
3rd July 2018, 11:18
so I'll start with:

Shi Shen;

4th century BC was a Chinese astronomer and contemporary of Gan De born in the State of Wei, also known as the Master Shi Shen.

Shi is credited with positioning the 121 stars found in the preserved texts. Shen also made the earliest surviving undated record of sunspot observation, which is sometimes erroneously credited to Gan De. He assumed that these spots were eclipses that began at the center of the sun and spread outward. Although he was wrong, he recognized the spots for what they were – solar phenomena.

Solar phenomena...

Stone carving by Huang Shang...

star chart rubbing

http://i61.tinypic.com/2q3b0qq.jpg


What's this got to do with the price of tea in China?

Egypt for that matter?

Shi Shen was one of several "Masters" of any given civilization who marveled at the stars. A pastime that never died out. In fact became a quest and race between nations in our day. One we've all though about at some time or another I'm certain.

In Ancient times it was supposed the quest to discover what's out there was based on seasons for planting. Sacrificial rituals to the Sun Gods, to reap a better crop during the season and such. Some civilizations had a booming voice from the sky sending messages and warning to heed otherwise the wrath would be great.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ozlo2FOs0Ho


I used that particular song because it expresses one particular thing. The path we all travel, yet the promise that home is always there for you.

Lyrics in the song: Just know that where ever you go you're not alone.

http://i58.tinypic.com/2drtlqd.jpg

My personal quest for the Red Dot was something I've been working on since I was very young. Now I started to tell this story once but stopped. I figured what does it matter anyhow! Well it matters to me. In the quest to find some answers and the Red Dot I ran into some rather interesting things and people along the way.

What do you suppose drove Shi Shen to map the stars?

Probably the same thing that drives me to find the Red Dot...

One of the main reasons I happened to join my first ever forum (the original Avalon) was because I was searching for some answers as to the why, and hows of a personal nature of events within my own personal experience.

So ... one particular dimension and concept. That would be Time. Speaking of time please note the date on some of the referred links to some coming posts I'll add here soon. It's rather important to understand the two things I'm going to refer to right now.

Time: Is a dimension in which events are ordered from the past through the present into the future.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time

Pretty basic concept.

Now another concept. A thought experiment:

Retrocausality: Is any of several hypothetical phenomena or processes that reverse causality, allowing an effect to occur before its cause. Retrocausality is primarily a thought experiment in philosophy of science based on elements of physics, addressing the question: Can the future affect the present, and can the present affect the past?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retrocausality


Can the Future or present effect the past?

Back From the Future

A series of quantum experiments shows that measurements performed in the future can influence the present. Does that mean the universe has a destiny—and the laws of physics pull us inexorably toward our prewritten fate?

http://discovermagazine.com/2010/apr/01-back-from-the-future#.UvJ0nbQr2eA


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARgiPJobKnE&feature=youtu.be

I love the way she finds music to accentuate posts.

In one of Joe from the Carolinas recent videos he spoke about science and evidence. He pointed out that if you want to talk about and believe in torsion physics, for example, you'd better not be too averse to 'evidence based' and 'science based' thinking.

Torsion physics plays a role in this thread.

Shadowself
17th July 2018, 10:27
Oh wow! I didn't know you guys were posting here.

Ya know this is all Aragorn's fault! Here I am...it's 4:30 in the morning. I had a weird dream about gorillas of all thing! So I make some coffee...check the forum and Aragorn posts about Time dilation!

It reminded me of my recent epiphany...and how the answer was staring me right in the face and I did not see it. In fact it was so simple it blew my mind!

So...I think I will complete this thread and my findings today after I've had some coffee to wake up....

http://i58.tinypic.com/1zp1tfa.jpg

I am 99.99999% sure that I was in fact correct in my assumption as to my findings in this tomb! Aragorn you'll probably have to wait till you wake up later to see it. ....Until then my friend!

http://i62.tinypic.com/2igewas.jpg


I love the way she finds music to accentuate posts.

In one of Joe from the Carolinas recent videos he spoke about science and evidence. He pointed out that if you want to talk about and believe in torsion physics, for example, you'd better not be too averse to 'evidence based' and 'science based' thinking.

Torsion physics plays a role in this thread.

It sure does! That and what I'm about to show you today are very much in sync.


http://i58.tinypic.com/201deb.jpg


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gP_aUkr4a9I

Dreamtimer
17th July 2018, 10:49
:):love::D

Shadowself
17th July 2018, 11:06
Darn! I went to the OP of this thread and the first video is dead!

So..I'm going to do a brief recap of the important parts that lead to my conclusion as to the coded message here. It should not take too long.

Shadowself
17th July 2018, 11:33
Okay then..So what am I asserting here before I go any further?

A review:

I'm suggesting that this tomb was hacked prior to it's discovery and as in the case of a published paper from 2011 the possible circumstance that is required prove time travel to the past. Here is a copy of one example and a published paper with the link to the paper and several methods including the grandfather paradox describing the possibilities.

http://i61.tinypic.com/2mfk64l.jpg

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1101.1927v1.pdf



It's already been proven that travel to the future is a possibility btw given the right technology and posted here already by a group of physics professors which is also credited by the late Stephen Hawking and agreed with by Kip Thorne and Dr. Leonard Susskind. It's travel to the Past that is in question. Which would have to be possible if you were an ancient cosmic traveler and wanted to get back home to the same time. Is it possible? Let's see.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQC3ErD1YwE

If indeed this tomb was hacked with a mathematical formula that at that time had not been discovered yet it would have to be hidden and not that obvious. It would have to be in the form of a cryptography and it might contain visual semiotics and how the pieces fit together. It would require signs and codes of direct meaning or interpretation....somewhat like this example:

Osiris/Orion

The Hunter

http://i57.tinypic.com/2w33rph.jpg



Glucose transporter (hunter) titled

Beta-D-Glucose which starts the

Gluconeogenesis Pathway consisting of a series of "eleven" enzyme-catalyzed reactions.

http://i59.tinypic.com/16c1b3a.jpg

In humans the main gluconeogenic precursors are lactate, glycerol, alanine and glutamine.

Glucose is the human body's key source of energy.

Glucose is a primary source of energy for the brain, so its availability influences psychological processes. When glucose is low, psychological processes requiring mental effort (e.g., self-control, effortful decision-making) are impaired.

~

Lactose is a disaccharide sugar derived from galactose and glucose that is found in milk.

Infant mammals nurse on their mothers to drink milk, which is rich in lactose. The intestinal villi secrete the enzyme called lactase (β-D-galactosidase) to digest it. This enzyme cleaves the lactose molecule into its two subunits, the simple sugars glucose and galactose, which can be absorbed. Since lactose occurs mostly in milk, in most mammals, the production of lactase gradually decreases with maturity due to a lack of constant consumption.

Married to Osiris the Hunter:

http://i61.tinypic.com/szd30y.jpg

So what have I just provided in the images here?

The "hour glass" shape of Orion and "hour glass" shape of Glucose have a similarity. But the connotation is different. One is a pattern in the stars. One is a molecular structure of glucose. Isn't it quite intriguing how one is similar to the other?

That's a symbol of visual semiotics.

Double meanings?

Check it:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6zTvrGirfg

Shadowself
17th July 2018, 11:43
I will now attempt to show you some interesting dates that correspond to the center point on the tomb and their alignments.... the center point is again the red giant Aldebaran.

So first of all...this image in the tomb is quite interesting and has been worked on for quite some time to determine when exactly this might be. When this alignment of stars and constellations might have occurred and the possible connection to the planets in question.

First I'm going to leave you with a paper written by one who has studied this map and the Abstract:


“The Astronomical Ceiling of Senenmut: a Dream of Mystery and Imagination”
by Juan Antonio Belmonte

http://i57.tinypic.com/2hi0br5.jpg

https://www.academia.edu/4993866/The_astronomical_ceiling_of_senenmut_a_dream_of_my stery_and_imagination


~

Here is a view where Mars would not be in view of the northern hemisphere but clearly Aldebaran would be. It's also an interesting date which I will be sharing here soon.

http://i58.tinypic.com/apcxgo.jpg

That is an example where Mars would not be in view at the same time as Aldebaran in the northern night sky.

I also at this time would like you to note the vicinity of Jupiter and again reiterate the properties of the stuff within Jupiter.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QO27Wjl8e9c

This freaky fluid as NASA calls it is:

A Freaky Fluid inside Jupiter?

"Liquid metallic hydrogen has low viscosity, like water, and it's a good electrical and thermal conductor,"

It makes for one gigantic generator.

It's important to understand this behemoth because it wielded a lot of influence in the solar system's formation. After the sun took shape out of the solar nebula, Jupiter formed from the majority of leftover material. The state and composition of the material remaining just after the sun formed are preserved in Jupiter.

"It holds the heirloom recipe that made our solar system's first planets," says Bolton."And we want it."

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2011/09aug_juno3/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallic_hydrogen

~

Speculation: Is Jupiter the Eye of Horus? What is the connotation?


O Osiris the King, the gods have knit together your face for you and Horus has given you his Eye, that you may see with it.

Further speculation and one persons possible connotation:

http://home.hiwaay.net/~jalison/bowles.html

http://home.hiwaay.net/~jalison/bowles2.html

Shadowself
17th July 2018, 11:54
Cosmic accelerators


Black holes are well known for their ability to pull matter into them. But not all material near a black hole finds itself lost. Some bits of matter just outside the point of no return (called the event horizon) are accelerated away at near-light speeds, creating jets of particles shooting out above and below the black holes.

Nemmen said, referring to the Large Hadron Collider, an underground machine in Switzerland that speeds protons to 99.9999991 percent the speed of light...

When matter is spun away from a black hole in the form of a jet, most of its energy goes into its motion, but some of it is changed into light in the form of gamma-rays. Nemmen and his team studied findings on 293 previously observed black holes and calculated how efficiently the jets converted energy to light. They found that the rate scaled across the range of black holes.

"This was one of the surprises of this work, that this efficiency of conversion of the energy into light is essentially the same for black holes with very different masses, very different ages and completely different environments," Nemmen said.

Black holes are powerful beasts, interesting in and of themselves. But by accelerating ionized gas, they also have the potential to change their environment. Heating up space, they could affect the production of new stars, thereby influencing the galaxy they live in.

"These jets might be powerful agents of creating changes in the host galaxy," Nemmen said.

https://www.space.com/18893-black-hole-jets-similarities.html

~

WATER emitted from a black hole:

http://www.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de/pressreleases/2003/2



Discovery of WATER being emitted from a black hole....


BLACK HOLE HOLDS UNIVERSE'S BIGGEST WATER SUPPLY

https://www.wired.com/2011/07/black-hole-holds-universes-biggest-water-supply/

~


Wasn't it Russia that was some how involved in a spinning light show?


When matter is spun away from a black hole in the form of a jet, most of its energy goes into its motion, but some of it is changed into light in the form of gamma-rays. Nemmen and his team studied findings on 293 previously observed black holes and calculated how efficiently the jets converted energy to light. They found that the rate scaled across the range of black holes.


http://i60.tinypic.com/b8ptoo.jpg

Blueshift: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blueshift

The inner horizon, radiation is blueshifted as it accumulates.

"Field of Turquoise and the Blue One, Lake of Turquoise,
traveling with turquoise, Lord of Turquoise, and open door of the blue sky".

Indicates blueshift or the high frequency light associated with
approaching radiation.

In contrast, radiation moving away from the observer appears redshifted.
The Dead King observes:

he who departs is red and smeared

"N" has gone up in the red hour.

~

In ancient Egyptian this is the letter N:

http://i40.tinypic.com/vnlf7n.jpg

Three of them make the word for water:

http://i40.tinypic.com/vnlf7n.jpg
http://i40.tinypic.com/vnlf7n.jpg
http://i40.tinypic.com/vnlf7n.jpg

There has been much speculation about the constellation represented by four stars encircled by an ovoid Most represent Orion:

http://i59.tinypic.com/5x2ali.jpg

The wavy lines around the middle star (three of them) represent WATER.....Which is also the "PRIMER" to the code I believe I discovered.

~

Remember the Norway spiral?

Want to see the night sky when the Norway spiral occurred from Norway?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxA0Asq2YDg


On 10 December 2009, the Russian Ministry of Defence confirmed that a Bulava missile test had failed.

Lots of speculation on this blue spiral from Norway. The photo I presented was a view from Norway.

But through some efforts there was an analysis done on this thing what ever it was.

It was determined the center volocity was at 8000 RPM's. Can you imagine! It was also determined that this spiral was not directly over Norway but:


So back to the drawing board. It was headed Northeast so I reconfigured it from Murmansk in a NE direction....Here is what I got. I also determined it happened just before 8AM so I used 7:53 as the time... Lo and behold Aldebaran is center in the night sky from that position.



http://i60.tinypic.com/2hi9tew.jpg



Here is an explanation from Joseph Farrell on the Norway spiral. While I'm not sure I go along with his theory on HAARP but I suppose it's possible..I think there was something (possibly a satellite) that assisted this phenomenon and I agree with his summation in general. But the dates show an alignment with Aldebaran in the night sky at that time. But according to the mid night sky Aldebaran is center point to that area from that direct point.

Now I don't know if HAAPR creates or is effected by a torsion field but a Wormhole would definitely be effected by spin fluid as the source of spacetime torsion and of course light. Something to consider...which is something I will be expanding on later.


(Jump to 7:47 to skip the intro)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eS4tt53yvuk

But there's more on the alignments with Aldebaran and dates that I've discovered in the next post.

Shadowself
17th July 2018, 12:06
So in 2009 the Russians had a foul up test which at first they denied then the next day admitted.

A few years later:

Then later I hear this group where somebody tells me and other members of this group that there is this experiment being done in Russia. It involves a pyramid...it involves "brackish water"...it involves a "crystal top" to the pyramid....and quite interestingly it has an "atomic clock" perched in the center toward the top.

Then I'm told that they are going to "test" this thing...possibly...on August 11, 2012.




Well now...That it turns out is quite an interesting date. It happens to be the date the Mayan Calendar was started in 3114 BC if I'm not mistaken. To be exact it was the starting-point equivalent to August 11, 3114 BCE in the proleptic Gregorian calendar or 6 September in the Julian calendar (−3113 astronomical).

So I checked out these dates and a few others and noticed pattern.

First date to check the one of the supposed test: August 11, 2012

And there is an alignment of Jupiter, and Aldebaran with the Earth.


http://i59.tinypic.com/zlqmhl.jpg

Okay I thought what's the significance? First thing I thought of was Jupiter as a great relay power station of sorts. But remember this was just a test right? A measurement of sorts. But for what? And why? I really had no idea.

Then I started to look into this date and much to my surprise I ran into this star Aldebaran once again. Only this time it was in the middle of the pacific ocean.

So, here I am one morning having my coffee while researching the Cornell University Library for "philosophy of physics" and what do you suppose pops up?

find this:

The Astronomical and Ethnological Components
of the Cult of Bird -Man on Easter Island

What? What the heck is that doing in the "Physics" category I ask myself?

So I click on it and do a bit of skim reading.

My eyes popped out of my head!

Astronomical Simulations as the Main Clue: Part 2...Page 6 & 7 of PDF

http://i60.tinypic.com/3091spf.jpg

https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1309/1309.6056.pdf

Toward the bottom of page 7 is this...

37624

So I checked those dates:

August 10, 1690

http://i58.tinypic.com/f22bld.jpg

August 11, 1796 when the dates stopped for this particular activity at Easter Island:

http://i59.tinypic.com/rkcv9l.jpg

Notice the proximity of Jupiter in all of these...

Aragorn
17th July 2018, 12:11
You're on a roll, Brook. ;) Don't stop — unless you need to rest, and you do, of course. You should listen to your body. :hmm:

But this stuff is brilliant. :) :hugs:

Shadowself
17th July 2018, 12:17
You're on a roll, Brook. ;) Don't stop — unless you need to rest, and you do, of course. You should listen to your body. :hmm:

But this stuff is brilliant. :) :hugs:

Wait till you see how simple it is!

Dumpster Diver
17th July 2018, 12:18
Great thread, thanks again for returning to it again!

Shadowself
17th July 2018, 12:24
So let's take a look at the Mayan Calendar dates:


starting-point equivalent to August 11, 3114 BCE in the proleptic Gregorian calendar or 6 September in the Julian calendar (−3113 astronomical).

August 11 3114 BC:

http://i60.tinypic.com/m7yp2e.jpg

Sep 6 3113 (Julian calendar):

http://i58.tinypic.com/2d9plqr.jpg

http://i60.tinypic.com/900fwi.jpg


Now...let's look at that big day where nothing happened on December 21, 2012

http://i59.tinypic.com/ws1jrq.jpg

http://i62.tinypic.com/2cg1mk4.jpg



Are you seeing the pattern? The proximity to Jupiter and the line of sight to Aldebaran?

Aragorn
17th July 2018, 12:33
Are you seeing the pattern? The proximity to Jupiter and the line of sight to Aldebaran?

I was just thinking of that. Jupiter was much closer on that day than Mars was, and Mars has the nearest-by orbit to Earth away from the sun — but of course, it needs about twice as much time as Earth in order to orbit the sun. Interestingly, Ceres was also very close to Earth at that point. :hmm:

Shadowself
17th July 2018, 12:35
So...you have Aldebaran a red giant which is a powerful source of energy and Jupiter...also a powerful source of energy (and possible relay source) in alignment with earth.

My mind wanders to the idea that if you were an ancient and extremely advanced civilization with the technology to traverse/bend time to travel throughout the universe or at least this galaxy...utilizing those sources of energy might very well be a great source to stabilize a traversable wormhole. Line of sight would probably also be imperative.

So next... let's see if we as a civilization have achieved the beginning lessons of bending time to do the same kind of travel. Remember we are still quite primitive compared to the kind of civilization that I just described. We are babies and have yet to completely utilize such knowledge in a civilized manner. Just look at the state of the world to understand that. But this subject has always had me intrigued as I have had some experience in direct and very prominent premonition that showed me traveling time and mind are very connected in this area as well. But that is another subject on another level.

So what is in this tomb that would verify this information as the beginning of our own evolution to the stars and beyond? That is in the next few posts. If you've stuck with me this far I'm almost there so hang on.

Shadowself
17th July 2018, 12:46
Okay...pause for the cause...The next few posts are extremely important to understand what I discovered.

For Dreamtimer I leave you with a song while I rest and take a breather because non of the posts I just did contain music as I usually do.

Remember Aldebaran is the center point of the bottom half of the ceiling.....there is another center point and it's the KEY!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aq4_b2Vnty0

Shadowself
17th July 2018, 13:11
I guess if you're just joining here....starting at the top of this page is the beginning of the summary. Have fun! Don't let the gorillas get to ya! :frantic:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyHNuVaZJ-k

Shadowself
19th July 2018, 02:49
Good evening,


Here I thought I had the energy to maintain! HA! Posts that used to take me 5 minutes now take an hour! And oh the countless typos! I digress...

So I'm going to leave two more posts and that should catch up the summary. Then sometime tomorrow I'll show you what I discovered recently that blew my mind again. I was stuck on the code and was sure it had to do with computer code of a sort. Which of course I know nothing about. In this thread I asked for assistance from the member Icam88 who had understand of that. Then I just gave up for awhile as I got stuck.

No...it was much simpler. So simple I could not believe it.

I started this thread in 2015...but the research and development of my first findings was in 2010. That is 8 years of some intense research.

What I failed to do when I started this summary was add the tomb itself. Doh! That would be helpful if you had not joined in before. The next two posts after this are extremely important to understand what I will add tomorrow. If you want to truly understand what I've discovered then do please read the nest two posts.

So here is the tomb...I will do two posts and again tomorrow finalize it.

This is the tomb of Senenmut

http://i42.tinypic.com/sooevk.jpg


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RenYQ1Cuz3I&feature=youtu.be

Shadowself
19th July 2018, 03:03
First I want to add this:

http://i62.tinypic.com/29o4g7l.jpg

From page 4 of this PDF

http://www.eng.utah.edu/~nmcdonal/Tutorials/EncryptionResearchReview.pdf

~

So if you were going to leave a coded message from the future you would definitely want to leave it before this period of 1900 B.C. right?

That tomb was before the advent of such cryptography in Egypt during the reign of Hatshepsut in 1473 B.C.

The tomb was discovered during the 1925-1927 excavations. So you have a discovery year to work with here and you have a time when Cryptography was not in use. Perfect for such an experiment.

~

I could probably fill several pages with evidence that this tomb was tampered with in such a way as to convey the message I assert is here.

Starting with the dig:

Here is the first excavation. In it you see the attempt to seal it off with a thick wall. But the top is open upon excavation. Now that may not seem so strange but the time it had to be opened was before a huge pile of clay chips were deposited in front of the entrance which were from tomb 71 Senemuts other tomb. You see Senemut had two tombs. One was more of a funerary tomb which was meant for burial. However they never found a mummy there as I'm aware. That would be tomb # 71. It's tomb 353 that is in question here.

http://i57.tinypic.com/1zzji2v.jpg

At the first stage of clearing the upper left hand corner image is what they found. An opening big enough for someone to enter it. It's been claimed that is how they must have left it. That is absurd...The closing of this tomb would be complete not left open like this in this manner.

~

When Dr Peter F. Dorman who is a renowned Egyptologist and epigrapher, philologist was doing his thesis on this dig he first of all found that the records of the dig were almost non existent. In other words the original notes on this dig have turned up missing. The only notes that Herbert Winlock has are what he turned in to the Metropolitan Museum and this is all. The original notes are just gone. As stated by Dr. Dorman in this thesis/book. This dig was commissioned by the NY Metropolitan Museum of art by Herbert Winlock the person in charge of this dig would have kept daily records of the dig. They are just gone. Disappeared. However he did write a book on the dig and there is where it gets strange...because all that is there is Winlock's after the fact assertions. Which Peter F Dorman brings into great question while giving Winlock great props for the find.

You see in Dr. Dorman's thesis he (who knows a great deal about deciphering Hieroglyphs) has about 40 pages on Chamber A (the chamber with the astronomical ceiling) and has worked to decipher them. The problem is it was not easy and he asserts very often two main problems:

1) The walls around this chamber are filled with "mistakes". ie from his thesis/book:

http://i58.tinypic.com/212bxy0.jpg

......."N" is missplaced?

But that's not all. In this forty pages of a 284 page thesis/ turned book....he makes several distinct notes which make the wall of this chamber even stranger.

2) the hieroglyphs are "mixed' with Hieratic Script which was painted and added on to the "carved" scripts around the walls. Which as I think you might remember I asserted in earlier posts that around the false door would probably contain the actual coded message. Now Hieratic Script is not usually found on the walls of tombs as a general rule..let alone mixed with standard Hieroglyphs.

But that's not all. There are distinct "changes" noted by several scholars who've worked to figure out this chamber. None of which make sense.

From two different sources first one Dr Dorman asserts on the "water mark"....described as the sixth cluster:


http://i59.tinypic.com/5x2ali.jpg


http://i62.tinypic.com/vylhs.jpg

The sixth cluster is out of place?

but he also asserts on the writing in that cluster:

http://i61.tinypic.com/nprhqt.jpg

In the 40 pages of decyphered texts on the wall and ceiling he has several times admitted it's been "hacked". Unusual term indeed considering my assertations.

He is not the only one to notice the hacking of the tomb. The Standing Man on the bottom half has been noted by several authors on this tomb and referred to as changed and hacked.

http://i59.tinypic.com/2cx9v7b.jpg

~

Now, just so you know around the walls of that chamber is the Book of the Dead and it's been massively hacked with painted Hieratic Script. In fact here is some of that script painted on and they are dates as an example of such hacking.

http://i59.tinypic.com/23ux2f7.jpg

Of course Dr. Dorman is not going to write a thesis and assert this has been hacked from someone in the future right? But I am convinced it is because of the massive inconstant things within that ceiling and the walls that surround it. Not one person who has studied this tomb can make sense of the placement within that ceiling, room and much of it's content. Even Dr. Dorman asserts they "made mistakes" and he greatly attempts to make sense of it. Some of which I flatly disagree with. One example would be his assertion on the two turtles I mentioned in an earlier post for which his explanation makes absolutely no sense at all.

Here is the book for your review but I warn you it's long. And everything I'm about to share of it's content are in this book.

http://libmma.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15324coll10/id/176704

In ancient Egyptian this is the letter N:

http://i40.tinypic.com/vnlf7n.jpg


So I don't know encryption or cryptography but I know there is something here and it's starts with "N".


http://i61.tinypic.com/jzcox3.jpg

Shadowself
19th July 2018, 03:12
The Book of the Dead is very common. Hacking it with Hieratic Script is NOT common. In fact several times in those 40 plus pages he notes the misplacement of N. The fact that it was hacked into and painted upon the carved hieroglyphs of a common theme such as the Book of the Dead is also key. Many of the words were changed and again just don't make sense as to the content.


The Book of the Dead is very common and no great secrets to erase or change there. Which of course makes this even more interesting.

Note: Here is one of the walls containing the Book of the Dead. Each one of those vertical lines of script contain carved and painted script of a different nature. One Hieroglyph the other painted on Hieratic. Now of course it's hard to see given the shadow of the photograph but it's been noted as there.

If you were to take each one of those lines and extract the Hieratic script perhaps there you'll find the coded unproven theorem I referred to. But that is to be determined here soon.

Image of one of the walls of the Book of the Dead:

Added this view of one of the walls again because that sure looks like the mouth of a wormhole to me. Of course that is actually the passage to the underworld.

http://i59.tinypic.com/21eb05f.jpg

~

Here is a good example given by Dr Dorman of the N misplacement painted on.....From Liturgy 7 of the Book of the Dead texts upon those walls in chamber A

http://i58.tinypic.com/1054r2q.jpg

Ho Osiris N?...N? Really? And it's painted on?

And then there is this....

Same wall:

http://i60.tinypic.com/k17xvk.jpg


Here is one more example of the Extraneous (in his own words) N:

http://i62.tinypic.com/1zn5t3s.jpg

Clearly this tomb has been hacked.

Here is the false door again:

http://i60.tinypic.com/28i9nvm.jpg

Here is the bottom portion of that false door that was hacked:

http://i66.tinypic.com/28s1vzn.jpg

Elen
19th July 2018, 11:53
That is so interesting Brook, thanks for taking the time to explain it in such detail. I immediately thought about the helicopter Hieroglyph and checked it out...it's apparently solved as well, I would never have guessed actually. :)

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_XerteKH1jd0/S_mOW8honHI/AAAAAAAAAKE/myjsaop_EjU/s1600/helicopter+hieroglyphs+abydos.jpg



Here's the link for the explanations...
http://raincool.blogspot.com/2010/05/helicopter-hieroglyphs-explained.html

Shadowself
21st July 2018, 11:15
Thanks Elen,

That's a very good example.

I know I keep promising "tomorrow", but yesterday was particularly a bad day to do what I must to finish this. I came real close to entering myself into the emergency room. While not even certain that what I was experiencing (sharp pain/stabbing) was cancer related I was in some sorry shape to do what is necessary to complete this thread. I waited and through the pain medication I take it subsided. So far it has not returned in any full strength but still exists on a minor level. So I have not been able to do this thread as I had hoped. Just a side note; cancer can be very painful.

Today I also have to do some travel outside the home which has been my repository for rest. I expect I will not be finishing this today either. So I'm shooting for tomorrow as long as there are no other complications.


Until then shine on you crazy diamonds!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UXircX3VdM

Elen
22nd July 2018, 05:54
I feel for you Brook...sending love, and I love the music...Pink Floyd. :group hug:

Shadowself
22nd July 2018, 13:35
Good Morning!

So...if this is what I think it is the "Unproven Paradox" which is sending a mathematical proof to individuals in the past that is obtained from the fact that there is a recipient in the past that publicly reveals the proof.



Background: The Unproven Paradox involves sending a mathematical proof to individuals in the past that is obtained from the fact that there is a recipient in the past that publicly reveals the proof. David Deutsch asks the question: Where did the proof originally come from? Another interpretation of this scenario simply leads to the conclusion that "information" cannot be sent back in time (probability of self-inconsistent events is 0).

Scenario: Suppose, in the future, we generate a one-time pad from a source of perfectly random bits and encrypt (bitwise XOR) a desired mathematical proof. Assuming its existence, we use a communications channel (ex. CTCs) to send this ciphertext back to ourselves in the past. From the perspective of participants in the past, this information should be structurally equivalent to and indistinguishable from random data. Currently unproven text/mathematical proof during the original construction of said tomb in question.

Note that this communications channel can be noisy. Assume that this noise factor makes it so that the probability of a successful transmission of "unproven" ( data in the past) information is zero. For example, sending a proof in the clear that has not been proven should not be possible due to noise. This is intended to be a "direct" way of combating the Unproven Theorem paradox or so they infer in the world of physics.

Our past selves decrypt the information using the pad to recover the original plaintext. Assume that the participants in the protocol operate in good faith and that we have sufficient error correction abilities. Depending on the theorem itself, we may be able to formally verify its correctness..

This is a good way to avoid the Grandfather Paradox as the information is somewhat coded...but there is enough there to determine if the mathematical equation was intact enough and hidden enough to avoid the Grandfather Paradox.

So let's say we've discovered in the near or far future how to not only achieve such a feat to send information to the past to be hidden somewhat but documented just the same as an equation that was never known to be a working model of said math or physics involved equations of in this case an 18th dynasty tomb...you'd want it to be clear enough and precise enough to be proven and successfully delivered and documented as well. It would have to be coded in the same language of that time and refer to that equation. In this instance hieroglyphic and heretic combined in the tomb as I've show that exist in that tomb and have indeed been referred to as "hacked" by many authors and scholars of Egyptian culture and discovery.

One tends to feel such a point of view is more suited to fiction than science, and indeed I grappled with that for a very long time but what hit me from the very beginning was indeed something is out of place. something is coded and it begins with N and water is the key. Now I've said that several times within this thread and many others that I've laid down the groundwork that has led me to this conclusion and simply could not let it go. Because if this was indeed true it would show a jump in our achievements as well as enormous advancements in science to do what most think is impossible. That would be travel to the past and place the proof of a mathematical equation that during the time frame of the existing tomb was not available.

It would indeed be proof of the FIRST TIME such an achievement was attempted and proven.

Quite coincidentally Aldeberan is also referred to as Alpha Tau...which quite literally means...FIRST TIME.

So here goes...

Shadowself
22nd July 2018, 13:53
As noted here By Dr Dorman The sixth cluster is out of place:

http://i62.tinypic.com/vylhs.jpg

Also noted on the cluster is this:

http://i61.tinypic.com/nprhqt.jpg

Which is this:

http://i59.tinypic.com/5x2ali.jpg

On the ceiling of the upper half which is quite literally a transition of star clusters and the EMPTY boat of Mar...meaning mars is not visible in the transition of the night sky within that order of visability. And Orion would be out of place in that transition. Which to this day has stumped the Egyptian scholars that have studied this tomb.

http://i42.tinypic.com/sooevk.jpg

The bottom portion is indeed center stage: Aldebaran...Alpha Tau...meaning First Time.

Shadowself
22nd July 2018, 14:00
I'll take one of the images I prepared which indeed shows during a transition of star clusters where Mars is not visible during the transition of the night sky when Aldeberan is clearly on the other side...take a look where Orion is. It is clearly out of place as well as to the transition of star clusters that are depicted on the ceiling.

Where each boat in the top portion shows a transition of star clusters. To indeed represent the night sky during a particular time which is devoid of Mars as represented as an empty boat.

http://i60.tinypic.com/900fwi.jpg

Shadowself
22nd July 2018, 14:14
What is it that is so easy for me to see now, that I did not see it before? Although I did within this thread and several others mention said equation. I did not put it together in its simplicity!

Why? Because of one word. One word used by said scholars that can indeed be looked at as another thing altogether!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZjAantupsA

This will take a few minutes to prepare...because of the images I need to gather.

Emil El Zapato
22nd July 2018, 15:29
"Background: The Unproven Paradox involves sending a mathematical proof to individuals in the past that is obtained from the fact that there is a recipient in the past that publicly reveals the proof. David Deutsch asks the question: Where did the proof originally come from? Another interpretation of this scenario simply leads to the conclusion that "information" cannot be sent back in time (probability of self-inconsistent events is 0)."

That's interesting...

some folks would argue that a 'quantum download' could violate this principle in spirit, if not in fact. or then again maybe not. Theoretically, in quanta, time and space are very malleable if they even exist. For a concrete example we could use the akashic record (that's such a good one). All knowledge is contained...even the container is knowledge. It cares not about time or space. So as an intrinsic property of it, nothing of it is ever transferred from one space-time point to another, it is merely accessed by the higher consciousness (self) which is universal in its reach. Crazy people call that a 'download'

Of course, there are always problems with downloaded info...noise?

that's a bit of a digression...For Whatever It's Worth... :)

Emil El Zapato
22nd July 2018, 15:38
What is it that is so easy for me to see now, that I did not see it before? Although I did within this thread and several others mention said equation. I did not put it together in its simplicity!

Why? Because of one word. One word used by said scholars that can indeed be looked at as another thing altogether!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZjAantupsA

This will take a few minutes to prepare...because of the images I need to gather.

now that is funk-eeee :)

Shadowself
22nd July 2018, 16:10
While looking up Dr. Dormans explanation of Orion... he calls it an Egg as seen here:

http://i62.tinypic.com/vylhs.jpg

That is when I saw the difference. You see most other scholars refer to it as an Ovoid. Example:

http://i63.tinypic.com/169547s.jpg


From J. Belmonte

http://i63.tinypic.com/16029va.jpg

In fact that is how it's been referred to by many. He also refers to it as:

http://i63.tinypic.com/2qva9ad.jpg

~

Indeed the Ovoid or Egg as it's been referred to is this:

http://i40.tinypic.com/vnlf7n.jpg
http://i40.tinypic.com/vnlf7n.jpg
http://i40.tinypic.com/vnlf7n.jpg

Which in fact does represent WATER in hieroglyphic terms.

~

And this does in fact mean N in hieroglyphic terms


http://i40.tinypic.com/vnlf7n.jpg


So you have an Ovoid/Egg that is written in hieroglyphs as WATER.

~

Then it hit me...

This can also represent FLUID DYNAMICS!

If this misplaced square that is thought to be Orion represents the three stars of Orion and the center point with the star circled with fluid dynamics that is indeed part of not only a mathematical problem It's the better part of WORMHOLE DYNAMICS!

http://i59.tinypic.com/5x2ali.jpg

Allow me to show you. As described here:

http://i67.tinypic.com/2b8s90.jpg

And here:

http://i67.tinypic.com/2dkh9l.jpg

https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.02465

Fluid dynamics is part of the study in fact regarding wormhole dynamics and very relevant.

Not only that!

But fluid dynamics is represented as Egg/Ovoid shaped!

http://i65.tinypic.com/2s6vi1d.jpg

Quite simply in its simplicity shown here!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluid_dynamics

But what about N? That's a biggie! And quite associated to this image:

http://i59.tinypic.com/5x2ali.jpg

Coming up next....and when you put the two together you have what I have suspected for a very long time!

Shadowself
22nd July 2018, 16:15
I'm not done yet! There's one more part!:headspin:

The math is not complete yet.

N=

In fact where is the equation in what I just provided?

It's not there because I've not provided it yet.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-CeOWDBoFg&feature=youtu.be

Dreamtimer
22nd July 2018, 17:55
You're killing me!:popc::popc::popc::pc: (I'm gonna get indigestion from all this popcorn)

Shadowself
22nd July 2018, 18:26
You're killing me!:popc::popc::popc::pc: (I'm gonna get indigestion from all this popcorn)

Have to stop and fix something to eat and another pot of coffee is in the making as well! :headspin:

I promise today is the day I finish this.

Shadowself
22nd July 2018, 20:58
So here it goes...

CTC's or Closed Timelike Curves:

If CTCs exist, their existence would seem to imply at least the theoretical possibility of time travel backwards in time, raising the spectre of the grandfather paradox, although the Novikov self-consistency principle seems to show that such paradoxes could be avoided.

In "simple" examples of spacetime metrics the light cone is directed forward in time. This corresponds to the common case that an object cannot be in two places at once, or alternately that it cannot move instantly to another location. In these spacetimes, the worldlines of physical objects are, by definition, timelike. However this orientation is only true of "locally flat" spacetimes. In curved spacetimes the light cone will be "tilted" along the spacetime's geodesic.

For instance, while moving in the vicinity of a star, the star's gravity will "pull" on the object, affecting its worldline, so its possible future positions lie closer to the star. This appears as a slightly tilted lightcone on the corresponding spacetime diagram. An object in free fall in this circumstance continues to move along its local axis, but to an external observer it appears it is accelerating in space as well—a common situation if the object is in orbit, for instance.

A closed timelike curve can be created if a series of such light cones are set up so as to loop back on themselves, so it would be possible for an object to move around this loop and return to the same place and time that it started. An object in such an orbit would repeatedly return to the same point in spacetime if it stays in free fall. Returning to the original spacetime location would be only one possibility; the object's future light cone would include spacetime points both forwards and backwards in time, and so it should be possible for the object to engage in time travel under these conditions.

~

Okay then...I've highlighted in Blue the important things to recognize about CTC's.

~

Next:

Now I know for fact that I have mentioned this in this thread. But I failed to recognize its significance.

1) The n-body problem

In physics, the n-body problem is the problem of predicting the individual motions of a group of celestial objects interacting with each other gravitationally.

Solving this problem has been motivated by the desire to understand the motions of the Sun, Moon, planets and the visible stars. In the 20th century, understanding the dynamics of globular cluster star systems became an important n-body problem.

The classical physical problem can be informally stated as:

Given the quasi-steady orbital properties (instantaneous position, velocity and time) of a group of celestial bodies, predict their interactive forces; and consequently, predict their true orbital motions for all future times.

Knowing three orbital positions of a planet's orbit, he was able to produce an equation by straightforward analytical geometry, to predict a planet's motion; i.e., to give its orbital properties: position, orbital diameter, period and orbital velocity. Having done so, he and others soon discovered over the course of a few years, those equations of motion did not predict some orbits very well or even correctly. Newton realized it was because gravitational interactive forces amongst all the planets was affecting all their orbits.

The above discovery goes right to the heart of the matter as to what exactly the n-body problem is physically: as Newton realized, it is not sufficient to just specify the initial position and velocity, or three orbital positions either, to determine a planet's true orbit: the gravitational interactive forces have to be known too. Thus came the awareness and rise of the n-body "problem" in the early 17th century. These gravitational attractive forces do conform to Newton's Laws of Motion and to his Law of Universal Gravitation, but the many multiple ( n-body) interactions have historically made any exact solution intractable. Ironically, this conformity led to the wrong approach.

Newton concluded via his third law of motion that "according to this Law all bodies must attract each other." The existence of gravitational interactive forces, is key.

The problem of finding the general solution of the n-body problem was considered very important and challenging.

In case the problem could not be solved, any other important contribution to classical mechanics would then be considered to be prizeworthy. The prize was awarded to Poincaré, even though he did not solve the original problem. (The first version of his contribution even contained a serious error). The version finally printed contained many important ideas which led to the development of chaos theory.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N-body_problem

~

So why is this important? It brings you to:


2) The Two-body problem



Any discussion of planetary interactive forces has always started historically with the two-body problem.

In classical mechanics, the two-body problem is to determine the motion of two point particles that interact only with each other. Common examples include a satellite orbiting a planet, a planet orbiting a star, two stars orbiting each other (a binary star), and a classical electron orbiting an atomic nucleus (although to solve the electron/nucleus 2-body system correctly a quantum mechanical approach must be used).

The two-body problem can be re-formulated as two one-body problems, a trivial one and one that involves solving for the motion of one particle in an external potential. Since many one-body problems can be solved exactly, the corresponding two-body problem can also be solved. By contrast, the three-body problem (and, more generally, the n-body problem for n ≥ 3) cannot be solved in terms of first integrals, except in special cases.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-body_problem

Which brings us to the:

3) The Three-body Problem


In physics and classical mechanics, the three-body problem is the problem of taking an initial set of data that specifies the positions, masses, and velocities of three bodies for some particular point in time and then determining the motions of the three bodies, in accordance with Newton's laws of motion and of universal gravitation, which are the laws of classical mechanics. The three-body problem is a special case of the n-body problem. Unlike two-body problems, there is no general closed-form solution for every condition, and numerical methods are needed to solve these problems.

Historically, the first specific three-body problem to receive extended study was the one involving the Moon, the Earth, and the Sun. In an extended modern sense, a three-body problem is a class of problems in classical or quantum mechanics that models the motion of three particles.

In 1911, United States scientist William Duncan MacMillan found one special solution. In 1961, Russian mathematician Sitnikov improved this solution.

The Sitnikov problem is a restricted version of the three-body problem named after Russian mathematician Kirill Alexandrovitch Sitnikov that attempts to describe the movement of three celestial bodies due to their mutual gravitational attraction. A special case of the Sitnikov problem was first discovered by the American scientist William Duncan MacMillan in 1911, but the problem as it currently stands wasn't discovered until 1961 by Sitnikov.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-body_problem

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sitnikov_problem

Thus...Configuration of the Sitnikov problem

http://i64.tinypic.com/33vyw47.jpg

Look familiar yet? Let me help you...

http://i59.tinypic.com/5x2ali.jpg

But that is not all...more to come with this equation and CTC's

Shadowself
22nd July 2018, 22:26
In the post I just made: CTC's

As I noted in the last post I highlighted certain portions to be noted.

CTC's: In these spacetimes, the worldlines of physical objects are, by definition, timelike. However this orientation is only true of "locally flat" spacetimes. In curved spacetimes the light cone will be "tilted" along the spacetime's geodesic.



Let's look at the tomb from another view, in specific that portion...

http://i66.tinypic.com/29zee08.jpg

you'll note not only 3 stars noted in 2 sections but a tilted view of three stars in section as highlighter here.

http://i68.tinypic.com/xemowp.jpg

Well that's interesting...

In curved spacetimes the light cone will be "tilted" along the spacetime's geodesic.


But what about the Three-body problem? Specifically the Sitnikov problem


The system consists of two primary bodies with the same mass {\displaystyle \left(m_{1}=m_{2}={\tfrac {m}{2}}\right)} \left(m_1 = m_2 = \tfrac{m}{2}\right), which move in circular or elliptical Kepler orbits around their center of mass. The third body, which is substantially smaller than the primary bodies and whose mass can be set to zero {\displaystyle (m_{3}=0)} (m_3 = 0) moves under the influence of the primary bodies in a plane that is perpendicular to the orbital plane of the primary bodies.

The origin of the system is at the focus of the primary bodies. A combined mass of the primary bodies {\displaystyle m=1} m=1, an orbital period of the bodies {\displaystyle 2\pi } 2\pi , and a radius of the orbit of the bodies {\displaystyle a=1} a=1 are used for this system. In addition, the gravitational constant is 1. In such a system that the third body only moves in one dimension – it moves only along the z-axis.

Significance?

Although it is nearly impossible in the real world to find or arrange three celestial bodies exactly as in the Sitnikov problem, the problem is still widely and intensively studied for decades: although it is a simple case of the more general three-body problem, all the characteristics of a chaotic system can nevertheless be found within the problem, making the Sitnikov problem ideal for general studies on effects in chaotic dynamical systems.


Now...for those who may be unaware because they have not read this thread. I spent a significant amount of time describing the bottom half of the tomb ceiling and it's specific association to CHAOS THEORY...specifically dynamical systems in CHAOS THEORY. hence the title of the thread itself!


So does the N Body Problem or three-body problem, CTC's and traversable wormholes even have a reference point?



Check it:

The two-body problem in geometrodynamics


Abstract

The problem of two interacting masses is investigated within the framework of geometrodynamics. It is assumed that the space-time continuum is free of all real sources of mass or charge; particles are identified with multiply connected regions of empty space. Particular attention is focused on an asymptotically flat space containing a “handle” or “wormhole.” When the two “mouths” of the wormhole are well separated, they seem to appear as two centers of gravitational attraction of equal mass. To simplify the problem, it is assumed that the metric is invariant under rotations about the axis of symmetry, and symmetric with respect to the time t = 0 of maximum separation of the two mouths. Analytic initial value data for this case have been obtained by Misner; these contain two arbitrary parameters, which are uniquely determined when the mass of the two mouths and their initial separation have been specified. We treat a particular case in which the ratio of mass to initial separation is approximately one-half. To determine a unique solution of the remaining (dynamic) field equations, the coordinate conditions g0α = −δ0α are imposed; then the set of second order equations is transformed into a quasilinear first order system and the difference scheme of Friedrichs used to obtain a numerical solution. Its behavior agrees qualitatively with that of the one-body problem, and can be interpreted as a mutual attraction and pinching-off of the two mouths of the wormhole

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003491664902234

~

I think the boys at CERN might think so...N Body and particle physics...and CTC's

Solving The N-Body Problem in (2+1)-Gravity

I'm going to image and present specific sections of this paper presented at CERN

http://i65.tinypic.com/1d6he.jpg


http://i63.tinypic.com/24o65h2.jpg


http://i63.tinypic.com/2ng8qwh.jpg


http://i63.tinypic.com/rbiclt.jpg


http://i66.tinypic.com/2ajcoye.jpg


http://i66.tinypic.com/v3g3d3.jpg


http://i65.tinypic.com/r76i9x.jpg



And you get the gist....from here: http://cds.cern.ch/record/292146/files/9511207.pdf



~

Now I would say gravitational movement would be extremely important in stabilizing a wormhole. What's more I've in fact taken three body's here... Aldebaran...Jupiter...and Earth to coordinate a specific system with a generating planet such as Jupiter. You know the freaky fluid that exists in it that would in fact be a marvelous generator for such a system set up.

As there is more to add later to this it is indeed the end of the impending proof of 99.999999% proof that this indeed is a sample of the unproven paradox theorem that is most possible and probably as to the placement of Orion as the Key to the equation.

I digress....hope you all understood all that as sometimes I'm not certain that I explain things well.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JwYX52BP2Sk

Emil El Zapato
22nd July 2018, 22:46
"A closed timelike curve can be created if a series of such light cones are set up so as to loop back on themselves, so it would be possible for an object to move around this loop and return to the same place and time that it started. An object in such an orbit would repeatedly return to the same point in spacetime if it stays in free fall. Returning to the original spacetime location would be only one possibility; the object's future light cone would include spacetime points both forwards and backwards in time, and so it should be possible for the object to engage in time travel under these conditions."

And that is the big buzzkill. Among an uncountable infinity of possible locations the chance, is that old near zero probability, that one would return home. Under those conditions time travel is not only possible it is inevitable... :)

Shadowself
23rd July 2018, 02:36
Ah! I found a video to describe the the Sitnikov problem

Note the center body and it's reference to Time. Note the fluid dynamics involved and you do indeed have this:

http://i59.tinypic.com/5x2ali.jpg


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ckoMPBVHUD4

Explained very well here So much so you can actually see the wormhole dynamics displayed and reference to chaos theory::


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lis6y6fqjtk

Dreamtimer
22nd May 2019, 12:27
The fourth dimension is less than six degrees away, right?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=391&v=eGguwYPC32I

To Infinity...and Beyond!

Emil El Zapato
22nd May 2019, 14:07
I just saw Aragorn's lost wallet

One thing I learned recently is that some 'scientists' equate Degrees of Freedom and dimensions... I don't see it that way. It is similar to the concept of a 'vector measure' and 'magnitude measure'. They can be measured with the same units but they are very different in nature. hmmm, but also Einstein's 4th dimension, theoretically is a measure of time...simply put, it is a 'difference in time' that comprises the 4th coordinate. (but some scientists differ in their interpretation) suggesting that time is not a single dimension but rather an emergent property of multi-dimensionality...so in the end...I certainly don't know what is or isn't. :)

age really doesn't matter until one gets old anyway...He be born that way...

Aragorn
22nd May 2019, 16:58
I just saw Aragorn's lost wallet

Was there anything left inside of it? Because the one I have now is pretty empty. :p

Emil El Zapato
22nd May 2019, 17:32
no, nothing changed... lol...

Aianawa
21st August 2021, 07:21
Since we NZ is in lockdown again, i can research strongly and feel to research dear Shadowself's thread here, early ones especialllly, feels pearls there may be.


Keep going guys!

No wrong answers here. All taken into consideration. I'll be reading here for a few days. Then over the weekend I'll continue on.

Thanks for the great reply so far!

Consider this: Six degrees of separation...and Chaos. What's the connection?

Remember...no wrong answers here.

I'll leave this to ponder:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rzxAyY7D7k

Enjoy!

Maybe so so much more important Now.

Dreamtimer
21st August 2021, 15:58
Makes one wonder who they'll see just around the corner...

Aianawa
24th August 2021, 05:57
Oh yes, indeed