Strange Sounds in the Sky. (the never-ending series)

[jimmer]

here's a well produced compendium of recently recorded odd, disturbing, haunting sounds in our the skies.

my take?
this all has to do with geo-engineering. (HAARP, etc.)
what's yours?

at the 6:20 mark, notice the striated sky.
some believe: where there are chemtrails, HAARP is soon to follow.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4pexs-xwYk

[Bob]

Hi Jimmer - i've actually heard the sky sounds myself, specifically the "trumpets" which reminded me of the sound that a large semi-truck would make traveling down the road.. however something that is about the size of 10 ocean liners sounding off at the same time.

What I heard was definitely coming from the sky.

Prior though to that, strange bumps, like explosion sounds were heard coming from UNDER the ground.

When I researched, there were very large coronal mass ejections from the sun hitting the earth's magnetic fields.. Which could have brought forth underground fault slippages..

I would think it also could evoke different ionospheric layers slipping by each other, creating acoustic range sounds..

To hear it personally is really amazing, it sounds very B I G, like a very big object is emitting the sounds..

[jimmer]

When I researched, there were very large coronal mass ejections from the sun hitting the earth's magnetic fields.. Which could have brought forth underground fault slippages..

I would think it also could evoke different ionospheric layers slipping by each other, creating acoustic range sounds.

so you think these sounds have a 'natural' explanation?

if so, this atmospheric symphony must have been occurring forever.

seems like a more recent phenomenon.

(ok, bugling sky sounds are in the bible, etc., but me thinks this onslaught is more artificial. no?)

[The One]

Here's an explanation here http://www.sott.net/article/240863-Strange-Sounds-in-Sky-Explained-by-Scientists


https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=69&v=M0BvIySscEY

[Aragorn]

so you think these sounds have a 'natural' explanation?

if so, this atmospheric symphony must have been occurring forever.

seems like a more recent phenomenon.

(ok, bugling sky sounds are in the bible, etc., but me thinks this onslaught is more artificial. no?)

Some of those sounds could indeed be natural. I don't particularly recall ever having heard any such sounds myself (yet), but as I was watching this video, I was thinking along the same lines as Bob was, regarding coronal mass ejections having acoustic atmospheric and subterranean vibrations as a result -- or at least, whereas a number (but not all) of those sounds would be concerned.

"The Rumble" (at 21'00" to 21'40" into the video) appears to be moving from the right hand side of the cameraman to the left, and then loses intensity as it seems to be moving farther away, and with a possible muffling of the sound by the trees. Although I am only theorizing at this point, I'd say that this particular phenomenon was the sound of a hypersonic jet with pulse-detonation engines. In reality, the pulse-detonations would be in a much more rapid sequence, but the perceived time between the detonations could -- emphasis on "could" -- be a kind of Doppler effect due the fact that the plane travels away from the observers, and that it does so at hypersonic speed -- think: above Mach 5, which is approximately 6'126 km/h or 3'806 mph.

Hypersonic flight differs from supersonic flight in that a normal supersonic plane -- e.g. any modern jet fighter, or even the Aerospatiale Concorde passenger plane (and its former Soviet counterpart, the Tupolev Tu144) -- still has surfaces on the fuselage and wings where the airspeed is subsonic, whereas with a hypersonic plane, all air rushing over any surface of the plane (and into the engines) is supersonic. This also has a significant impact on the design of the aircraft. Hypersonic planes typically don't have the same type of wings as conventional aircraft -- the wings are either absent or else very stubby and thick, lest they would get ripped off by the aerodynamic drag -- and the whole fuselage of the plane is designed to create lift and funnel the supersonic airflow into the scramjet intakes.

Several US Department of Defense contractors -- e.g. Boeing, et al -- are currently experimenting with unmanned hypersonic prototypes capable of speeds between Mach 10 and Mach 15. These aircraft are themselves launched from underneath the wing or fuselage of a carrier plane -- commonly a B-52 bomber -- in-flight because they don't have any means for taking off from the ground. Scramjet engines -- i.e. ramjets in which the air intake is supersonic -- don't have a turbine-driven compressor like turbojets, turbofans and turboprops do; instead the compression and combustion of the fuel-air mixture is the result of the high-speed air intake caused by the flight itself. Or otherwise put: hypersonic planes have to already be airborne and moving at very high speed in order for their engines to be able to work, as well as for their fuselage to generate enough lift to keep the plane in the air.

Although not all ram- and scramjet engine designs are pulse-detonation engines, many are. Pulse-detonation means that instead of having a constant combustion of the air-fuel mixture and thus having a continuous jet coming out of the exhausts, the combustion happens at intervals, and as such, with short bursts coming out of the exhausts, thrusting the aircraft forward in a "metered" way. The contrails from such an aircraft would then also have "knots" in them, rather than being smooth, straight lines, and the sound of such a type of combustion would be reminiscent of repeated single-shot gun fire.

Now, this is all one possible explanation for the particular sound heard between 21'00" and 21'40" into the video, but I'm not going to claim to be correct on that. I am also not going to exclude that some of the phenomena might be caused by HAARP (and similar installations). Yet another possibility is that, if GoodETxSG was correct about the secret space war between fought above our heads, some of those sounds and visual phenomena could be caused by an exchange of weapons fire between space ships in the upper atmosphere and installations on the ground.

I do however also believe that at least part of the phenomena we witnessed in that video were the result of the impact of coronal mass ejections on the outer atmosphere, as Bob stated. Part of them, but not all of them. ;)

[jimmer]

gee everyone, glad I asked ; )

ok, one conspiracy down. 5280 to go : )

[Bob]

As Aragorn was saying, some of those sounds yup the CME's tweaking the geosphere and ionosphere.. Hope not to deviate too much off topic, but I have been in Churchill Manitoba when the Aurora was touching down to the earth, and one can hear the sounds.

Hearing something like a 10 mile long "ocean liner" (imagine something that big, with the corresponding "HORN" for something that size being blown).. no doubt biblical references when that HORN sounds, end times for that event could easily be assumed..

Just a bit of hypothesis here tho.. IF three very powerful low frequency tesla-like coils are setup on the earth, offset let's say by a mile apart, right angles like on the surface... and these are phase locked (timed properly) to each other, so that the waves all are either constructive or destructive.. (thats the setup)..

If the timing is altered, one can "virtually STEER" where the maximum energy or the scalar destruction appears, and sweep it.. Like a megawatt times three able to be directed underground, OR in the atmosphere could happen with that configuration..

Just conjecture if that type of system is being used.

[Aragorn]

As Aragorn was saying, some of those sounds yup the CME's tweaking the geosphere and ionosphere.. Hope not to deviate too much off topic, but I have been in Churchill Manitoba when the Aurora was touching down to the earth, and one can hear the sounds.

Hearing something like a 10 mile long "ocean liner" (imagine something that big, with the corresponding "HORN" for something that size being blown).. no doubt biblical references when that HORN sounds, end times for that event could easily be assumed..

Just a bit of hypothesis here tho.. IF three very powerful low frequency tesla-like coils are setup on the earth, offset let's say by a mile apart, right angles like on the surface... and these are phase locked (timed properly) to each other, so that the waves all are either constructive or destructive.. (thats the setup)..

If the timing is altered, one can "virtually STEER" where the maximum energy or the scalar destruction appears, and sweep it.. Like a megawatt times three able to be directed underground, OR in the atmosphere could happen with that configuration..

Just conjecture if that type of system is being used.

You're talking of a phased array, right? Isn't that how HAARP works?

HAARP can do deep underground radar-like geological scanning with only 30 Watt of power, but the most powerful HAARP installations currently in use -- like the one in Norway -- are capable of producing 1 GigaWatt worth of power. That's 1'000'000'000 Watt. They can do quite a bit of damage with that. No, not "can"; they do, actually... :belief:

I'm not trying to supply any fear porn, but people should be informed...:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilL48YYcCj0

[jimmer]

You're talking of a phased array, right? Isn't that how HAARP works?

excellent presentation on HAARP. (what's the backgrounder on begich?)
many attribute the recent ozone thinning/hole to this frankenstein tinkering of the natural order.
is HAARP the 'weapon' tesla decided not to reveal during his life? sounds like it.
upon his death, his residence was broken into, his safe and research papers – stolen.

and what do you know – I'm witnessing this big ship swinging a mighty turn towards my way of thinking :eyebrows:

can these sky sounds be caused by natural means? yes.

is the proliferation of these sounds something else?

watch this from a US military insider who has been blowing that whistle for years.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nYRMOwrDjI
okay, I haven't watched this video in years and it does get into some pretty disturbing areas,
like our military and gov't have been consumed by evil forces. forces that are turned against us.
I'm not biblically religious, but she seems know something that actually is taking place.
her's is a calling. a clarion call.
if you get queasy with the religious angle, please disregard that,
yet her broader message appears to be accurate.

[jimmer]

as an adjunct to this sky sounds story, could the same technology, whose residue causes sky sounds,
be used to swing the direction of a US presidential election?

seems that the answer is, yes.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4P7Kr17RX8
hopkins uses the term, TTA = Tesla Tech Array = HAARP

[Bob]

I think we're zero'ing in here. HAARP systems by themselves, are up in the higher frequency bands, and they don't have by those frequencies themselves, "deep penetration". How they achieve penetration is by:

1) wiggling the ionosphere with turning the signals on and off (pulse mode), the duration of the oscillation then has to be below 0.1 cycles per second or in 10 seconds there is one complete oscillation.

2) two frequencies are sent up into the ionosphere (still high frequency is used), so that the ionosphere absorbs both; the frequencies are offset by 10 cycles per second, which will mix, creating the sum and differences. That method would be adequate to create "brainwave" band signals, through lower resonant mechanical structure linking.

So deep penetration can be achieved indirectly using the ionosphere as the big bad transmitter, where HAARP is only exciting the ionosphere to create the wiggles at the desired frequency.. the #1 method described above is the more capable method to create the lowest frequencies in the earth, and that method could induce earthquakes. Method #2 above could induce biological effects, like disabling troops on a battlefield, burning out earthworms for instance needed for crops..

HAARP directly shoots straight up, or has a way to create a bit of a slant tilt, as Aragorn was pointing out, the "phasing" (timing) of the signals in the "array", i.e. phased array.. To get the signals to point downwards, it first has to point upwards, so that the signal that actually does the 'work' comes from the ionosphere itself..

The ionosphere itself is a whole bunch of charged particles, hanging out there, influenced by the sun, the time of year.. That is a trillion trillion watt transmitter just sitting there waiting to be "used", I believe is the logic behind the "explorers" looking at how to get that big bad transmitter in the sky working for them..

Normally the ionosphere is great and is a product of the oxygen/nitrogen of the atmosphere being excited by the sun; there is down lower an ozone layer for protection of dangerous short wave ultra-violet light coming from the sun.. All and all things remain balanced and quiet, as long as nothing is pulsing the sun from the above (like during the solar coronal mass ejection, (CME) ), or from the below with HAARP excitation..

So just normally "heating up" the ionosphere for what is called "ranging" or testing the altitude of the different layers is fine, that's just plain normal research..

It's playing around with the ionosphere as N. Tesla was looking at with earth/sky power systems.. Tesla was looking at higher frequency power, and a "standing wave" cavity, where one could put up a simple capture antenna and wirelessly pick up power from the flywheel created of the ionosphere wiggling at "power frequencies"..

Drop the modulation frequencies coming from the ionosphere, and one experiences a "depth of penetration" now into the earth, where there is then current of significan amount 'wiggling' earth faults, and heating them up, which can evoke slippage, i.e. 'earthquakes'. The higher frequencies are great for extracting power for wireless energy transmission.. The LOWER frequencies end up penetrating, and being "wasted" as far as power extraction ability goes - the lower frequencies then as they say, can be used for "underground exploration"... or as a weapon...

BUT what I was talking about was a bit of a simpler system that didn't need the massive HAARP.. HAARP is a bit of an experiment from what I can tell. Probing and learning what happens in the ionosphere/earth relationship when modulation happens.. modulation is turning on and off the heater beam, or selecting multiple beams, of slightly different frequencies and having them 'mix' in the ionosphere.. HAARP requires the ionosphere as the massive flywheel that will wiggle with the modulation - the wiggling of the charges in the ionosphere then is where the actual power comes from.. HAARP is like the match applied to the FUSE, where the ionosphere is the dynamite.. and the power..

What I was getting at, was the actual LOW frequency TESLA COIL-LIKE transmitters, only 3 of them running at high power - those 3 alone can be "phase" steered, and don't have to pull from the ionosphere. Those three alone are able to then be precisely steered, extremely precisely steered.

What N. Tesla was looking at, was using the pump of charges effect coming from the earth, to go through the coil and out into free-space above the coil - such appeared as "lightning" sparks. Such wasn't designed to couple directly into the ionosphere. I don't know if N. Tesla realized there was an ionosphere else it is possible he would have been creating "aerials" designed to use what is called "sky wave" or ionosphere bouncing. The Tesla coil transmitters weren't designed with high enough frequencies to adequately be absorbed by the ionosphere.. He concentrated on the EARTH ground waves, and the earth supplying the "charged" energy..

SO it is a matter of perspective, where are the charges being modulated; directly in the earth by the N. Tesla technique, or into the sky/ionosphere by the HAARP technique..

The N. Tesla technique directly and steer current in the earth when 3 coils are phase locked with each other - adjusting the timing of the 3 allows for the standing wave node to appear at any desired distance on, or in the surface of the earth..

The HAARP systems have a problem, steering of the sky/ionosphere flywheel energy.. Imagine a wheel 20 miles in diameter spinning and wobbling like a tire out of balance "up there".. how is one going to precisely cause that energy to DUMP ONLY where desired, and not flopping around everywhere.. That is the issue I believe WHY HAARP is generally being shut down in the US, it's a bit too dangerous to play around with that "flywheel" as it could dump anywhere at any time unexpectedly.. The US reasearch would have been done to verify that such is possible, but the other countries haven't quite realized the danger they are contemplating playing with..

[jimmer]

That is the issue I believe WHY HAARP is generally being shut down in the US, it's a bit too dangerous to play around with that "flywheel" as it could dump anywhere at any time unexpectedly.. The US reasearch would have been done to verify that such is possible, but the other countries haven't quite realized the danger they are contemplating playing with..

I've heard the same, that HAARP is being or has been shut down in the US.

do you really believe that?

such a powerful tool/weapon, being abandoned or is that a guise?
unless there's proof, I'd lean toward the latter.

[Bob]

I'll assume that if the 'research' aspect is done for the US side of things, to not continually run a 'weapons system' when not needed seems to make sense strategically, like why would a military show off a weapon's effects all the time, when a few dozen times may have been adequate to prove it works..

Looking at the phased pumping system, that seems to have been proven out.. but my guess is, the big "wheel in the sky" that is wobbling at ELF, and ULF frequencies is hard to control and precisely direct. Sorta on a small scale, imagine a hot air balloon with a cache of dynamite on it, able to be set down somewhere.. but it is kept aloft by the "heater" that powers the "system"... (like in HAARP)..

So that big balloon goes UP every time the heat (like in Haarp) is turned on, and then goes down when things cool off.. Up and down at some ELF or ULF rate.. but

and here is the problem... since it is a balloon, how is one going to precisely direct WHERE the balloon will drift? How to "shoot down" the balloon so that it's payload precisely falls where it is intended.

As I see the state-of-the-art, the balloon-like heater-bubble produced and excited through a HAARP system has that difficulty, no precision, more like that big ionospheric oscillation bubble would prove to be a mass-destruction system, over a wide spread area.. and lots of collateral damage.. due to lack of precision where the energy payload 'dumps'.

Specific WEATHER control systems though, those are a bit different, and the study of such has been accomplished over many years, and how to direct storm systems has been also developed - how to make them appear and disappear.. that tech is not HAARP because the ionosphere is not needed, just proper sized nano-particles (which suck up water vapor as they build in size).. those particles are then moved into place by high powered RADAR-LIKE transmitters..

[jimmer]

and here is the problem... since it is a balloon, how is one going to precisely direct WHERE the balloon will drift? How to "shoot down" the balloon so that it's payload precisely falls where it is intended.

some believe (the above sandy hurricane video) that's where chemtrails and chem-dumps come in.
not only prep the location of the TTA, but directing.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4P7Kr17RX8&feature=youtu.be&t=3m12s

[Bob]

I would think chemtrails and chemdumps would if done with the right sized nanoparticles provide a steering path, if those chemtrails and chemdumps remained fixed long enough for high altitude winds aloft to not take them apart..

Reminds me of how lightning can be forced to follow a path, a wire shot up into the clouds by a sounding rocket..

A particle stream would have to have a conductive path to the ground so getting those particles to stay fixed long enough, and in sufficient quantities, with trillions of horsepower of energy is sorta the issue.. How much energy can be directed precisely to move to precisely a given area..

If the ionosphere is involved, and that is many hundreds of miles up, and storms are like 10 miles up, where is the connection junction between the two? How can they seed the area in-between the ionosphere and the storms 90 miles below lets say.. those are some of the thoughts needed to be solved to figure out how they do it if HAARP is being used..

The nanoparticle tech is able to move particles up to about 100,000 feet from the transmitter, and blow them around with microwaves to suck in other particles. It seems to me that such a system could relatively easily be setup by submarines which go to the surface, launch a balloon system that contains a high voltage power supply hooked up to the sub's nuclear reactor, and the sub's phased microwave array could steer those nanoparticles wherever.. Then bringing down the antenna, submerging, moving to the next location, and repeating, something could be created, and steered, moved and guided..

What would be the issues? I would think some would relate to being seen or not seen by spy satellites, if that much energy is directed into an area that may trigger monitoring satellites too, and if other winds aloft and at ground level, would be too strong, and would blow away anything being created. The guess is they would have performed 'research' to determine solutions for those issues.. the last articles published on weather control are pretty old, sorta like things went dark after effectiveness was demonstrated in Mexico to deal with some drought issues.

[jimmer]

What would be the issues? I would think some would relate to being seen or not seen by spy satellites, if that much energy is directed into an area that may trigger monitoring satellites too, and if other winds aloft and at ground level, would be too strong, and would blow away anything being created. The guess is they would have performed 'research' to determine solutions for those issues.. the last articles published on weather control are pretty old, sorta like things went dark after effectiveness was demonstrated in Mexico to deal with some drought issues.

this whistleblower has evidence that HAARP-like units are peppered around the globe, hidden, beneath the ocean.
so, we gave up our land-based HAARP units.
turns out, if she's correct, we don't need them any more.
and can you tell this woman believes she is on a mission, from god ; )


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e127ohch4Dw

these are in the pacific ocean, directed at US.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xh4Fgaa6xx0

[Barbarella]

You're talking of a phased array, right? Isn't that how HAARP works?

HAARP can do deep underground radar-like geological scanning with only 30 Watt of power, but the most powerful HAARP installations currently in use -- like the one in Norway -- are capable of producing 1 GigaWatt worth of power. That's 1'000'000'000 Watt. They can do quite a bit of damage with that. No, not "can"; they do, actually... :belief:

I'm not trying to supply any fear porn, but people should be informed...:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilL48YYcCj0

A gigawatt of power. That's a lot of energy, truly an awful lot.

I'd like to see the antenna system they use to launch that amount of radio frequency energy. But more interestingly I'd like to know how a device with that much energy can be operated without detection by amateur scientists monitoring the ionosphere and magnetosphere all over the earth.

The video has also confused what shields the earth from various dangerous radiations. Almost all the shielding takes place in the ozone layer, (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone_layer) not the ionosphere.

There are guys (well mostly guys) out there who routinely monitor all manner of terrestrial man-made and natural signals from DC to light. I really don't think they'd miss a HAARP transmission or anything similar much below 100 watts, never mind a gigawatt!

Also, over the horizon radar using the ionosphere has been around since at least the 1970s. Ionospheric heating of the ionosphere is not practical (and usually unnecessary) to increase its reflective properties. See these images (https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=woodpecker+pulses&tbm=isch&imgil=r4fgK6p9e5KfQM%253A%253Bde-xjqEacgkWcM%253Bhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fen.wikipe dia.org%25252Fwiki%25252FDuga-3&source=iu&pf=m&fir=r4fgK6p9e5KfQM%253A%252Cde-xjqEacgkWcM%252C_&usg=__bSLKGdzBO7_3-dZxzvcJ2YDy7zA%3D&biw=1280&bih=876&ved=0CDcQyjc&ei=5gFyVb-1J-Lm7ga5vIPYBQ#tbm=isch&q=woodpecker+antennas) of what the Soviets used for over the horizon radar!! Makes HAARP look pathetic by comparison in size and capability.

The video says various 'assertions' were made regarding the effects of this Soviet device. Assertions are one thing, but there was no actual evidence of any damage to anything, apart from huge levels of unavoidable radio interference it generated, detected by government and amateur observers in every continent.

Babs

[Aragorn]

A gigawatt of power. That's a lot of energy, truly an awful lot.

It is, and especially if you know what they can already do with a meager 30 Watt.


I'd like to see the antenna system they use to launch that amount of radio frequency energy.

Here you go. But keep in mind that there are dozens of such installations all over the northern hemisphere -- including some that are quite a bit larger than this one here-below -- and a few in the southern hemisphere as well.

http://blog.world-mysteries.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/GmG_HAARP.jpg

http://ageoftruth.dk/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/haarp-facility.jpg

http://www.newsofinterest.tv/_sam_noitv/environment/haarp/index/_thumbnail_images/haarp_large.jpg



But more interestingly I'd like to know how a device with that much energy can be operated without detection by amateur scientists monitoring the ionosphere and magnetosphere all over the earth.

Oh, it is being detected alright. But just as with chemtrails, any and all criticism is simply laughed away, or it is just being denied in spite of the solid evidence presented. In this day and age, the words "conspiracy theorist" are an easily applied label, and a very effective tool for truth suppression.


The video has also confused what shields the earth from various dangerous radiations. Almost all the shielding takes place in the ozone layer, (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone_layer) not the ionosphere.

I'm afraid that's not quite correct. The ozone layer filters and reflects short-wave UV light and similar radiation, but all of the heavy lifting with regard to cosmic radiation, solar winds, coronal mass ejections et al, is taken care of by the magnetosphere (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetosphere) and the Van Allen belts (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt).

Furthermore, a few years ago, the HAARP researchers even prided themselves in that they had managed to punch a hole through the ionosphere, thereby temporarily drawing in part of the exosphere to a significantly lower altitude. What they did not mention, however, was what influence this has had on the weather in the northern hemisphere.


There are guys (well mostly guys) out there who routinely monitor all manner of terrestrial man-made and natural signals from DC to light. I really don't think they'd miss a HAARP transmission or anything similar much below 100 watts, never mind a gigawatt!

See higher up. ;)


Also, over the horizon radar using the ionosphere has been around since at least the 1970s. Ionospheric heating of the ionosphere is not practical (and usually unnecessary) to increase its reflective properties. See these images (https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=woodpecker+pulses&tbm=isch&imgil=r4fgK6p9e5KfQM%253A%253Bde-xjqEacgkWcM%253Bhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fen.wikipe dia.org%25252Fwiki%25252FDuga-3&source=iu&pf=m&fir=r4fgK6p9e5KfQM%253A%252Cde-xjqEacgkWcM%252C_&usg=__bSLKGdzBO7_3-dZxzvcJ2YDy7zA%3D&biw=1280&bih=876&ved=0CDcQyjc&ei=5gFyVb-1J-Lm7ga5vIPYBQ#tbm=isch&q=woodpecker+antennas) of what the Soviets used for over the horizon radar!! Makes HAARP look pathetic by comparison in size and capability.

The video says various 'assertions' were made regarding the effects of this Soviet device. Assertions are one thing, but there was no actual evidence of any damage to anything, apart from huge levels of unavoidable radio interference it generated, detected by government and amateur observers in every continent.

Babs

There were also several reports of alleged physiological harassment by way of the device. I'm guessing that the only reason as to why the NATO allies didn't really care to (officially) investigate was that they were trying to come up with a similar technology of their own.

[Barbarella]

Those antennas are horizontal dipole arrays and from the apparent size I'd say they worked at about 5 MHz, plus or minus. There's no way they'd radiate more that a few tens of megawatts without burning out, and certainly not a gigawatt, not even as an effective radiated power (the gain combined from phasing each antenna).

I write for a number of professional and amateur broadcast engineering magazines and have spent some decades in the RF business - at both ends.

If HAARP and its like had a fraction of the power that has been attributed to it, every time they operated they'd leave a huge electromagnetic footprint. All manner of monitoring equipment would go off the scale. When there are guys in Europe radiating beacon signals of only 10mW (that's 10 milliwatts, 0.010 watt) for ionospheric study on 7, 10, 14 MHz that are more than 20dB below the noise when received in Alaska and New Zealand, a gigawatt of HAARP isn't going to sneak past them!

One may surmise that official observations may be 'suppressed', but most of the enthusiastic amateurs I know would be the first to bring any dodgy, weird signal to all out attention via the various forums. New stuff occasionally gets flagged up - usually new HF military comms or ELF tests to submarines.

Indeed the ionosphere is certainly affected by cosmic rays, X-rays and UV light. This is very (and suddenly) apparent during a solar flare and the intense ionization of the D-layer.

Babs

[Barbarella]

Who says HAARP has got a power of 1 G-watt? Is that the RF output power or the transmitter input power?

Even if the transmitter is as much as 75% efficient, at least 1.25 GW has to come from somewhere. That's not a huge power plant, but quite difficult to hide. What fuel does it use? Presumably oil or natural gas up in Alaska. but where is it? Underground? With no chimneys or cooling towers? Or nuclear maybe. Who constructed it and moved all the spoil - and put it where?

What devices are supplying this gigawatt? Thermionic devices, solid state? Something new? And how is it being cooled?

Sorry, too many unanswered questions maybe...

Back on topic. I get the impression the whole 'Sounds in the Sky' thing was started as a hoax by some clever art/media students savvy with the internet and creating internet memes to see where they go, like the metal boxes washed up on the Oregon coast (http://hoaxes.org/weblog/comments/strange_metal_boxes_washing_up_on_beaches)in 2012.

OTOH, is there any plausible explanation for these sounds generated in the atmosphere? And why now?

Babs

[jimmer]

ok, my eye are drying out reading this technical back and forth. (brilliant as I'm sure it is : )

now that we see a connection between HAARP, chemtrails and sky sounds, check this out.
you don't need to speak french to get the picture.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlkVBkMb5cU

[Aragorn]

Who says HAARP has got a power of 1 G-watt? Is that the RF output power or the transmitter input power?

As I recall, it was both David Wilcock and Richard C. Hoagland who claimed that it has 1 GigaWatt of power, or at least, whereas the installation in Norway is concerned -- this was around the time of the infamous Norway Spiral. I have no factual evidence on whether that is true, and I have my doubts about Hoagland, although Wilcock does seem like a credible information source to me.

However, according to the documentary here-below -- which features one of the scientists who filed for (at least some of) the patents used in HAARP -- the installation in Alaska had or has 1 MegaWatt of power. That's 1'000'000 Watts.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SToVBicIrJU

According to Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Frequency_Active_Auroral_Research_Program), current HAARP power levels are up to 3.6 MegaWatt already -- that's output power, not input power -- at 2.8 to 10 MHz.


Even if the transmitter is as much as 75% efficient, at least 1.25 GW has to come from somewhere. That's not a huge power plant, but quite difficult to hide. What fuel does it use? Presumably oil or natural gas up in Alaska. but where is it? Underground? With no chimneys or cooling towers? Or nuclear maybe. Who constructed it and moved all the spoil - and put it where?

I don't know where they are getting their power from. Presumably they have their own generators -- gas turbines, probably -- but they may also be hooked up to the grid. The HAARP project falls under US military oversight, so that makes access to all the information highly restricted either way.


[...]

Back on topic. I get the impression the whole 'Sounds in the Sky' thing was started as a hoax by some clever art/media students savvy with the internet and creating internet memes to see where they go, like the metal boxes washed up on the Oregon coast (http://hoaxes.org/weblog/comments/strange_metal_boxes_washing_up_on_beaches)in 2012.

OTOH, is there any plausible explanation for these sounds generated in the atmosphere? And why now?

Babs

Several plausible explanations have been offered higher up in the thread already, given that it concerns a whole range of sounds, some of which are very different and probably do have their own distinct causes.

[Bob]

[..] Back on topic. I get the impression the whole 'Sounds in the Sky' thing was started as a hoax by some clever art/media students savvy with the internet and creating internet memes to see where they go, like the metal boxes washed up on the Oregon coast (http://hoaxes.org/weblog/comments/strange_metal_boxes_washing_up_on_beaches)in 2012.

OTOH, is there any plausible explanation for these sounds generated in the atmosphere? And why now?

Babs

I've heard the trumpet sounds and to me it was more like that massive ocean-liner horn blowing, but with a characteristic that sound like the more musical Mac truck type of horn. Turning one's head, there were several degrees of sound source.. to me that was at least a 10 mile or so perspective where the sounds were coming from, from the SKY in the west.

Within a day or so aftewards, there were loud explosion sounds, which sounded like the blasting that is done when avalanche control is happening.

The coincidence was earth had just been hit with a very large CME. It's possible that there were coronal holes earthfacing too, but I haven't correlated. I considered such interesting, and did some looking up on the internet and came across what Malc found.. and a website which had a history of sounds being reported. I don't know how anyone could have hoaxed what I heard, both the 'trumpets' and the massive explosion sounds..

==Post Update==

Here is a link that has some more information on the mechanics of the sky sounds

http://www.sott.net/article/240826-New-Sott-Report-Strange-Noises-in-the-Sky-Trumpets-of-the-Apocalypse- "trumpets of the apocalypse"

11 min video - this offers some other thoughts..:

/BUDYcapY1Qo

when you hear the sample of the audios recorded, its like woahhhh...


This next video presents the explosion sounds that I heard pretty accurately.. (from about 20 seconds to about 1 min 30 seconds)

M0BvIySscEY

[jimmer]

for your weekend strange sky (cave) sounds listening pleasure,
the tibetan monk cave – sounds of the spirit. (wait for it...)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=pZLlgpAqcW4
here's a website devoted to these on-going global acoustic events.
scroll down a very long list to review these many ear rattling happenings, beginning in 2008.

http://strangesounds.org/strange-sounds

[jimmer]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SToVBicIrJU

that, is one powerful video indictment.

so, it appears that sky sounds may very well be the audio residue from what began as a method to search for gas and oil,
that has morphed into a climate control tool, that led to a means of controlling entire global governments and their populations.
that's one hell of an investigative trail.

once again, here's hopkins revealing the global oceanic HAARP network.
(pls. recall that this brave woman is not the source of this information.
she is a conduit of information provided to her by either inside or retired military operatives.
excuse her biblical references for this is her precarious calling.)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5cMjyC3Icc

[jimmer]

a chemtrails pilot speaks out.
his rationale is pretty startling.
chemtrails provide an 'atmospheric shield of protection' from rogue-nation EMP attacks.
really?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZaD-H_j3pU

[jimmer]

dane wigington (one of the leading chemtrail activists) organized this
2014 shasta, CA city council meeting to expose the reality and threats
connected to geo-engineering.

so what happens when the citizenry becomes outraged, yet our representatives do nothing?
next election cycle require local and national politicos to take a position!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPnWaBsMYnY

video origin: http://geoengineeringwatch.org

[jimmer]

"soon after dispensing cw-7, the world froze – all life became extinct."

that's how the movie, snow piercer, begins –
with a vision of planes laying down heavy chemtrails to combat global warming.

it's worth your time.

http://trailers.apple.com/trailers/independent/snowpiercer/

[jimmer]

aragorn posted a compilation that included parts of this full documentary.

anyone interested in the sounds, HAARP and chemtrails subjects should give this a watch.

the trove of testimonial experts is joined by dr. begich (featured in a posted video presentation, above).

one of the most interesting aspects, running gags throughout, is the counterpoints added by project manager and PR guy
for the HAARP program. a real mut and jeff hilarity.

(click on the youtube logo to watch at YT)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O14Y7ajI8wg

[solarimplosion]

The fact is that, given the importance and magnitude of the phenomenon, addressed one of the most influential scientists who studied the sounds: the prof. Elchin Khalilov, a geophysicist who works in the field of geodynamics. Khalilov graduated in geophysics at the Azerbaijan State Oil Academy in 1981. Until 1984 he was a student graduate at the Institute of Geology IMGubkin Academy of Sciences in Azerbaijan and in the same year was awarded the highest award for young scientists in Azerbaijan through the Lenin Komsomol Award Azerbaijan in Science and Technology in recognition of his scientific achievements. In 1990 he defended his doctoral thesis at the 'Lomonosov Moscow State University on the study and prediction of earthquakes and volcanic eruptions, and was awarded the highest academic degree as doctor of geological and mineralogical sciences.

Elchin Khalilov in the center of the image. Credit: wikipedia.org
Mr. Khalilov, what is the unusual nature of the sounds reported by a large number of people in different parts of the world since the summer of 2011?
Many call them "The sounds of 'Revelation'. The reports we have received from all over the world: USA, United Kingdom, Costa Rica, Russia, Czech Republic, Australia, Brazil, Ukraine, etc. We have analyzed these sounds and found that most is within the range of infrasound, which is inaudible to humans. What people feel is therefore only a small fraction of the actual power of these sounds. It is noise at low frequency in the range between 20 and 100 Hz modulated by waves of infrasound very low, between 0.1-15 Hz. In geophysics, are called acoustic waves of gravity; They are formed in the upper atmosphere, especially on the border with the ionosphere. Reasons attributable to these waves could be earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, hurricanes, storms, tsunamis, etc., but the scale of the ringing observed in terms of both area and power, far exceeds that which can be generated by these phenomena.

Various newspapers around the world speak of sounds
In this case, what might be causing this hum in the sky?
In our opinion, the source of such immense and powerful manifestation of these acoustic waves of gravity would come from large energy processes. These processes include powerful solar flares and huge energy flows they generate, running toward the earth's surface and destabilizing the magnetosphere, ionosphere and upper atmosphere. Therefore, the effects of powerful solar explosions, the resulting impact of the shock waves in the solar wind, flows of corpuscles and bursts of electromagnetic radiation, would be the main causes of generation of acoustic waves of gravitation, following the increase of 'solar activity. Given the increase in solar activity (due to normal eleven-year cycle of schwabe, ed), leading to increased solar flares from the middle of 2011, we can assume that there is a high probability of correlation between the two phenomena. It should be pointed out that solar activity began to intensify sharply since early 2011, with its amplitude significantly greater than all the forecasts given by a number of leading scientific institutions in 2010 and 2011. Meanwhile, the observed increase of 'solar activity is fully consistent with the forecasts delGEOCHANGE, International Committee of the report published in June 2010. If this rate of growth of solar activity continues, its size by the end of 2012 will exceed the range of the solar cycle 23 , and in 2013-2014 the solar activity will reach its peak. The amplitude envisaged by us will be of 1.5 - 1.7 times greater than the amplitude of the cycle 23.

Our star
But she said that because of the "sounds of the apocalypse" comes from inside the Earth's core. What does it mean?
There are many possible causes relating these sounds. The fact is that the acceleration of the drift of the magnetic north pole of the Earth, has increased more than fivefold between 1998 and 2003 and is at the same level of points of intensification of energy processes in the Earth, since they are processes in the interior and in the exterior of the core, to form the geomagnetic field of the Earth. Meanwhile, as already we reported, November 15, 2011 all ATROPATENA geophysical stations that record the three-dimensional variations of the gravity field of the Earth, almost simultaneously reported a gravitational boost. Gift stations located in Istanbul, Kiev, Baku, Islamabad and Yogyakarta with a distance between the first and the last of about 10,000 kilometers. This phenomenon is therefore only possible if the source of this issue is the level of the Earth's core. The enormous energy release occurred from the core of the Earth at the end of last year, was a kind of start signal indicating the passage of the internal energy of the Earth to a new active phase. The intensification of energy processes in the Earth's capable of modulating the Earth's magnetic field, through a chain of physical processes in the ionosphere, generating acoustic waves of gravity in an audible range, heard by the world population in the form of a frightening sound low frequency in different parts of our planet. In both cases, although the cause is quite understandable for geophysicists, they are indicative of the expected significant increase in solar activity and geodynamics of our planet. If all this were true, we might expect. There is no doubt that the Earth's internal processes regulate the energy of our planet, and therefore, we should expect for the end of 2012 a sharp increase in earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, tsunamis and extreme weather events, with even higher levels, however, during the solar maximum in 2013-2014.
IN CONCLUSION - So, are still many doubts related to this matter, even though according to the scientist would be to exclude the media hoax. In his opinion the sounds would come from natural causes related to geological phenomena influenced by solar activity. If that were the case we would be facing an interesting phenomenon to be studied.

[jimmer]

IN CONCLUSION - So, are still many doubts related to this matter, even though according to the scientist would be to exclude the media hoax. In his opinion the sounds would come from natural causes related to geological phenomena influenced by solar activity. If that were the case we would be facing an interesting phenomenon to be studied.


sooo, the cause of the sky sounds comes back to increased solar flares.
that would certainly seem to be a 'natural' way for a scientific theory to be arrived at.

they are reacting as scientists should: cause and affect.
although, none of their theory comes from on-site measurements.
theirs is a cogent arrival to where the data directs them.

we do know that HAARP is an ongoing program, unleashing bursts up to a billion watts into the atmosphere.

perhaps there could be a scientific study of that kind of intrusion into the nature order and what the residue could be?

sky sounds, perhaps?