PDA

View Full Version : Declaration of Independence... Drafting in Progress.



Daozen
28th April 2015, 01:13
EDIT: I CLICK-POSTED THIS BEFORE IT WAS READY! PLEASE GIVE ME A FEW DAYS TO TIDY IT UP...!


http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/jupiter-ascending/images/9/9e/Hel2.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20150311214054




Contents:

1. Declaration of Independence
2. Background.





This document is not about signing up to anything, but signing out of this prison reality.




[Working Title] Personal Declaration of Independence

Structure:

1) Introduction, Statement of Intent

2a) Pick a subject
2b) Write what you don't want
2c) Write what you want.

3) Ask for help from the assembled guardians and light forces, and your soul family.

4) Close.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DP_ozdvTsak

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRm6lXCG1kw











Here's mine:


Personal Declaration of Independence.

This document details the timeline I'm building. I ask all sentient beings in all universes to assist me to create, clean, and maintain this timeline, if they so desire. I thank them for their help.


1. Agriculture.

I don't accept pesticides, GMO's, toxins, BHA (Butylated Hydroxyanisole) & BHT (Butylated Hydroxytoluene), Sodium Aluminum Sulphate and Potassium Aluminum Sulphate, Bisphenol-A (BPA), Sodium Nitrite/Nitrate, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Heterocyclic Amines, Acrylamide, Brominated Vegetable Oil, Artificial Food Coloring/Dyes, Dioxins, Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) etc.

and any other toxins in Agriculture. I ask that all groups deliberately spreading these toxins are neutralized in my timeline. I ask the entire universe to help me achieve this goal.


2. Food.

I want to see local food collectives, hydroponics and sprouting methods of farming worldwide. The energy levels and organization put into the movement needs to step up a level. Citizens of 3rd world countries are largely unaware that nutritious, ancient crops can be grown in 2-3 days, and instead waste time, energy and water cultivating crops that are vulnerable to weather changes. Going back to the ancient sprouting technology that our forefathers used would take a huge burden off current land use, return agricultural power back into the hands of local communities and improve health worldwide.

I ask that all entities and groups trying to control the food supply are arrested and removed from power as soon as possible, in powerful sweep operations.


3. Politics

I don't consent to satanists, murderers or child molesters in positions of power. They need to be removed as soon as possible, and I ask for powerful and consistent assistance in removing any enemies of humanity from controlling positions. I intend that this takes place as soon as possible. I ask that the controlling power structures are gutted from the inside, and that a genuine free market free market fills the power vacuum.

The individual is sovereign, and the expression of the highest universal law, provided he does not attempt to impose his will on another. Local councils are subordinate to sovereign humans, provincial governments are further subordinate to local councils, and so on. The Federal government is the lowest law of the land, not the highest. I do NOT consent to world government, and I will not put any energy behind any attempts to control humanity, or trick us into consenting to another control system. Sovereign humans, working alongside the creator, are the highest authority on Earth. All other institutions are subordinate to the sovereign human. All contracts implying control, hierarchy, or tacit consent, are hereby revoked, eternally. All contracts I signed are retroactively deemed to be written -without prejudice-

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/without_prejudice

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffersonian_democracy

While the Federalists advocated for a strong central government, Jeffersonians argued for strong state and local governments and a weak federal government.[42] Self-sufficiency, self-government, and individual responsibility, were, in the Jeffersonian worldview, among the most important ideals that formed the basis of the American Revolution. In Jefferson's opinion, nothing that could feasibly be accomplished by individuals at the local level ought to be accomplished by the federal government.

bsbray:
consider the original idea of Jeffersonian republicanism: that the individual take the most responsibility for his own life and rights, followed by a priority of local government, then state government, and finally, ideally with the least influence of all upon daily life, the federal government. The idea is that we should not be dependent upon others for our happiness and other basic rights, and expecting them to be provided by the politicians located the farthest from you is the most unrealistic.

*

I ask that any hostage situation on or off world is resolved as quickly as possible, using any means at our disposal.


4. Banking.

Likewise, I don't want satanists, murderers, or child molesters in any positions of power. I ask all assembled forces, beings, militaries and energies in the universe to remove hidden controllers and parasites as soon as possible.

I claim ownership of any money, gold, or accounts held in my name. I break, revoke and vapourize all implied, unstated and secret contracts. The dark power holding the financial system is hereby eroded, disintegrated, dissolved. The last remaining Cabalists holding the debt structures in place are removed. Humans are free again. I ask the all powers reading this to accomplish this goal.


5. Technology.

I don't consent to any interference from GWEN towers, Tetra systems, mobile phone masts, etheric monitoring technology, archonic slavery systems, or any other invasive technology from any level, plane, timeline or dimension. I intend that I am removed from all energetic prisons immediately, and continually. I am no longer a prisoner of the Matrix.

I intend that all HAARP, weather control and Earthquake technologies are rendered useless immediately, and contained by the highest technology available. I ask the highest energies and militaries in the Universe to join us and co-create this intention. All Earthquake and weather control machinery is destroyed, removed, vaporized. Steel expands, contracts, warps... shatters at the nano-level. All weapons that attempt to imprison and destroy humanity are ineffective toys.

I ask that groups with positive technology use their arsenal to break-up and clean the etheric prison surrounding Earth. I ask that vast swathes of galactic and Inner Earth energies build up, permeate and create huge cracks in the negative shell around this planet. I ask that these cracks become wider, turn into chasms, and continue expanding. I ask that these positive, loving, liberating divine feminine and masculine energies crash through every block and start the Great Awakening upon Earth. I ask that this process continues unabated, and the mood of the general populace becomes more positive, calm and loving. The technologies keeping us in slavery are hereby removed.

I ask that timeline technologies are used to create new areas and timelines. The energy keeps increasing, day by day, never letting up. The pulsing from above, from below, increases, until the public breakthrough phase begins. Health symptoms magically disappear. The negative aspects of the hologram are destroyed, and humanity continues on an organic, non-matrix timeline.


6. Military.

I do not consent to any interference from any military organisation attempting to stop me from claiming my destiny, or slow the spread of water and food technology on Earth. I do not give permission or energy to any entity, human, draco, alien or group attempting to trick, distract or destroy my attempts to liberate myself and my own timeline. I claim dominion and ownership of my timeline, and the Earth I inhabit.

I do not consent or give permission for cloning technologies to be used in any timeline that I own. I claim dominion over my timeline.

From September 2009:

The frustration we quietly focus on each other daily comes mainly from our misconception that other people are blocking our path to freedom. In the paradigm delineated by this film each person becomes a potential ally and communicator whose exponential power lines could eventually reach millions. If a critical mass of people make the right choice, a new time can come for humanity. If enough people slough off tiredness and defeatism for the fakes they are and work towards sanity nanometre by nanometer, an avalanche of understanding will burst out and light up humanities psyche. And just as many droplets gather and form into clouds, brooks, streams, rivers, boiling oceans, so the united effort of many individuals will merge and flow into a mighty victory as man's awareness crashes through barriers into the great awakening.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread500968/pg1#pid7094561



6. Social.

I don't accept the false belief that I, or any human being, am subordinate to any external agency, government, self-proclaimed royalty, or military organisation.

I claim full ownership of my sovereignty, my destiny, and my timeline.

I ask that the charlatans and enemies of humanity are healed and/or removed. If they won't accept healing, I ask that they are removed from this reality and taken back to source for processing. Humanity has voted overwhelmingly to be free, and I ask that my family, and all militaries related to them, plus all sentient beings that hear this prayer, are moved to help us liberate ourselves.

*

I want Earth's society to reach a peak of culture as described in the I Ching:

http://deoxy.org/iching/50




Affirmation

I am a sovereign citizen of the UK and Earth. I also have dual citizenship with other off-world and intra-terrestrial cultures. Knowing this, I call on ALL groups, forces, nations and people reading this, where-ever they are, to unite and work towards the above goals on EVERY level imaginable, in all areas of time. Furthermore I ask that any groups, forces, nations and people working to inhibit or slow down the spread of these ideas, or to imprison mankind, be immediately neutralized and removed from power, with alacrity, force and civility. I ask that the bonds of power surrounding this Earth, and illegal contracts and power structures, be dissolved in vast energetic currents.

I also ask that any individual or group working towards his or her own sovereignty, or the sovereignty of another person, groups, nation or city, be afforded the highest possible protection from the most advanced groups, nations, forces or people in existence.

I ask that any contracts signed on my behalf, plus any implied or quasi contracts are rendered broken, null and void, as they were signed or implied without my permission. I ask that Earth enters into a new agreement with the highest service-to-others oriented groups in existence.

Furthermore I ask that any group, nation, force or person in possession of advanced or ancient technology that can increase the service-to-others vibration on Earth use it to its fullest effect, clearing any negativity throughout the whole planet, and adding infinitely powerful healing energy to every human being on Earth on all levels.

Thanks for listening, Universe.

Signed,

Contact Point, A sovereign being on Earth.

Amended: 1:51am, Wednesday 29th April 2015, Taipei.

Amended, 08:26am, Monday, May 4th 2015, Taipei.

Amended, 11:19am, Monday May 4th 2015, Taipei.

Amended, 11:48am, Monday May 4th 2015, Taipei.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQHKolIqBGs














Background

One of the tasks the Agartha Network entrusted to me was the drafting of documents and contracts that would expedite the liberation process. The conversations began in 2009, broke off because of extreme danger, and continued in 2010, 2011. They made me aware that the project I was doing:

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread500968/pg1

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread508014/pg1&mem=

...was being WATCHED, by various groups above and below. This did not make me feel important, special or unique, because of the level of etheric attacks and physical threats at the time. In 2009, I felt blocked, confused and hunted. In 2010 - 2011 I eventually regained a measure of self composure, health and protection, and the training continued.

What I am going to write about can be done by anyone. I am not trying to get anyone to sign up to anything, join a webring or society. Many valiant attempts to break the legal agreements keeping us in prison have been made by dedicated groups over the past few years. Everyone has brought something to the table, this is my piece of the puzzle.

I offer a toolbox to help humans to remember their sovereignty and take hold of their timeline.

*

Much was hidden from me back then, but they told me that abuse of galactic law was a big deal and a part of the ongoing enslavement process. I have been trying to draft various documents since 2010.

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=145169&highlight=heyheyhey




ZHOEV JHO- The Cosmic Instruction Manual [EXTRACT]

This is a particularly important issue right now because there is a great deal of disturbance on the fourth dimension which is leaking into the third. (Please see the second note under "UFO" in chapter 1 for more information on the dimensions.) This is the unfortunate result of a little inter-dimensional misunderstanding. As the fifth dimension continues on its spiritual descent into the third dimension, it is now passing through the frontiers of the fourth. Some of the fourth dimension's darker denizens believe this incoming light to be a threat, and mistake their imminent transformation as a serious assault. A number of them have consequently formed a resistance movement that is fighting back, even though we are not fighting at all. The temporary chaos this has caused is making the fourth dimension look like a bad brawl in the Star Wars bar, and some of its disembodied refugees have made their way into the third dimension. Learn to recognize these energies and stay clear of them.

If a disembodied entity manipulates you in any way or wants your following at the price of your freedom, that entity is not on our team and doesn't have your best interests at heart. Any energy that is not contributing to the realization of your magnificence and mastery is not a part of this mission and is in the service of the dark forces. If an entity fails to meet this criteria, escort that being into the light.

Through your alignment with the light, you are in a superior position in relation to these temporarily confused forces. You have the power to bust them and lovingly usher them into the light. You can do this by identifying the entities, breaking any agreements you may have made with them, and, by an internal visualization, leading them into the light. This act will serve to assist the mission in its peaceful and efficient descent through the fourth dimension, while hastening its awaited arrival on the third.

Do not misinterpret this information. It is the light that is superior to these fourth-dimensional forces and not your winsome personality. Pitting yourself against them as if you were superior will invariably end in your resounding defeat. Call upon the Forces of Light in all your dealings with these energies. Your success will then be guaranteed, and there will subsequently be less mess to clean up.











Jupiter Ascending

http://content.internetvideoarchive.com/content/photos/9236/869383_045.jpg

In Jupiter Ascending, the Wachowski Siblings reminded us, knowingly or unknowingly, that humans are the rightful heirs of Gaia, not as owners, but as guardians, stewards and guests. We can't own this Earth, but we can own our sovereignty and our path.

Jupiter Jones is not one person, but all humans. We are not beholden to any other external legality. Just as plantation slaves were tricked into signing an X on documents they couldn't read, so we have been tricked, by implication and laws we do not understand. This makes these laws illegitimate.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasi-contract

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implied-in-fact_contract

*

Many valiant efforts have been made to draft similar documents. The OPPT brought something to the table, Andrew Bartzis has explained contract revocations. Winston Shrout has reminded us that many laws are fraudulent. The Gaia Confederation email discussions have brought some interesting ideas.

This document is not the final draft, but my part of the puzzle. You may use it or discard it as you wish.

I've got my timeline, other people have theirs.






















OPEN SOURCE

This document is open source. I will be posting MY version on my blog, which represents my personal intention for my particular timeline. I will start a petition but I encourage everyone to use my document as a jumping off point, and write their own version, and maybe start their own petition. We can add a clause that asks that the energy from our petitions is added together. As the light comes to this Earth, it comes in many vibrations. Each human being is a crystalline prism reflecting a particular wavelength and unique signature of light.

You may localize, adapt, and reword the document as you wish. It would strengthen our agreement if we were to link to each others

Instead of spending hours haggling over wording, everyone has the option to write their own specialized version. Some people are more poetic than others, some more magical, more grounded, more introverted... the more energy you pour into a document, the more accurate the statement becomes.

What clauses would you add? What should the title be? Can I improve the wording?




























Contracts are Magical

There are three aspects to contracts. It goes deeper than a signature. The three facets of a real contract are:

- Wording

A clear, technical, detailed and maybe poetic wording that expresses everything you are, and everything that you want. The wording can be edited over the course of weeks or even months.

- Energy

One show is not enough, one signature won't end tyranny either. Continually re-editing a document, and meditating on it's contents, will add energetic weight to the initiative.

- Sponsorship/Soul Family

In Indonesia 2011 they told me that 80 per cent of ground crew that had incarnated to help change the legal situation surrounding Earth had NOT woken up. They put me under pressure to perform various legal actions and writings, some of which I can't talk about yet. The pressure largely came because the Indonesians talking to me were themselves under certain restrictions. They couldn't tell me things I didn't remember myself. They were relaxed and easy to talk to, but extremely strict about certain protocols.

Understand, it's not just me that can write intentions down, there is a very large soul group that can accomplish this mission, but in 2011 I was more active than others. Now more people have woken up. Ultimately, all of humanity may be able to claim their sovereignty in one form or another.

It is important that we shrug off petty grievances and co-operate, but it's equally important that we have a loose, *genuinely* decentralized structure. I will work with people if we find points of mutual interest, but I don't need to sign up to anything.

I am not ALLOWED to join any groups, for reasons I will explain later. If you read the following document it will give you an idea why:

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/branton/esp_dulcebook34.htm (http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/branton/esp_dulcebook34.htm)

There are different people from various soul families incarnated on Earth right now. Some of these exteranl families carry more energetic and military weight than others. In Indonesia they told me there were some beings incarnated to Earth from 'Paradise'. Which Paradise it was, they wouldn't say, even when I nagged them. But they were adamant that this group would have a large effect on the outcome of the conflict, and could significantly reduce any potential carnage. Again, I am not talking big here, just passing on what they told me. I think that there may be millions of people in this group. Furthermore, there is not a fixed number of individuals in this group, as diligent spiritual practice can gain you entry to other realms on a soul level... on the other hand, laziness and indulgence can make you fail your mission. So there is no need for anyone to get arrogant.

Many members of these groups could not handle the low vibration of Earth, and ended up alcoholics, drug addicts, dysfunctional.... bitter, depressed, lost. But enough of them had woken up to at least gain some measure of critical mass, and hold the darks to a standoff. My Indonesian guides told me that this group was targeted by all sorts of equipment. As we know, most of the danger has passed now. Now, in 2015, etheric attacks are not as strong as they used to be, for the majority of liberation forces ground personnel. Many of the darks were secretly rooting for the paradise groups to win. It was hoped that these mediator groups were able to neutralize the war that was brewing. This was back in 2011. As you can see, we held the conflict down, and it will not come back so hot... The only worry now is a long slow grind to freedom, I intend that events speed up dramatically. The intention of this document is to speed up the liberation process in the timeline that I'm constructing.

I haven't read all of "I am Number Four," but it shows, in fiction format, the kind of battle that was occurring. Luckily for us, the war is mainly fought on the info plane.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Am_Number_Four

As the darks were not able to wipe out the soul group completely, they contented themselves with distracting them with an alluring parade of lies in the alt media sphere.

The intent of this honey-sweet disinformation is:

A) To keep humans, and especially the paradise soul groups, in a short term hamster wheel state of perpetual fear/hope, (it does not matter which, as long as they fail to wake up.)

B) To subtly promote the external saviour paradigm, while claiming not to.

C) To keep incarnates focused on the external battle, and deny them the quiet time necessary to go within, and write their own contracts and statements of intent.

This parade of lies has been partially successful, but people are starting to see through the veil, and recognize the lies.

Many of these paradise-type soul groups are inherently trusting, and cannot comprehend the level of effort expended to keep them in a warm, sweet, cocoon of ignorance. They are used to the camaraderie and friendship of the higher dimensions, and often fall for the sweet-talk and demagoguery of media personalities and false friends trying desperately to keep them asleep.

*

Everyone has their own timeline. Even if you don't agree with me, and Agartha Alliance is not your thing, it doesn't matter.

Forge your own destiny, make your own trail, and I'll see you on on the other side.

(Or not) :)


What Effects Will this Document this Have?

The effects are completely unknown. We are blind down here in this dimension. All I know is that in Indonesia they took the contract writing process very seriously. I look back on the statement of intent I wrote in 2010, and note that everything I wrote has started to happen:

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=145169&highlight=heyheyhey%22]http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=145169&highlight=heyheyhey

Does this mean I have power over other people's lives? NO. It means that we are living in an infinitely branching multi-verse, and each human being can set out an intent as he or she wishes. My mistake was to believe that writing a contract once was enough. Maybe I should keep drafting this time. I am not here to recruit, only to consolidate and sharpen my own vision.

It takes a long time for light to filter to the physical world, but the effects on the Etheric plane can be much quicker. Properly written documents, books, and blogs have a powerful presence on the other planes, no matter what the view-count. This battle is occurring on multiple dimensions at the same time. Like the Never-Ending story or Return to Oz, what you do in one timeline affects the other.

This afternoon, as I walked home, I could feel the Aether above the town I live in pulsing with a benevolent, otherworldly energy, like there was a huge buildup of force from outside the veil. The more I draft this document, the stronger this energy becomes.



ZHOEV JHO:

5
Assistance

The function of this section of the manual is to help you remember the vastness of the community you come from and the loving assistance the members of that community willingly extend to you all. We know it can feel lonely in the spiritual fast lane on this planet. But remember that this is only a feeling and not a fact. Please avail yourselves of the resources that are your birthright and know how much you are loved. This is Mission Control, on behalf of all the great Forces of Light, completely at your service.

Foreign Aid

Throughout the process of your awakening and beyond, you have the right to call upon Mission Control, the Council Seats, all Alliances, Federations, and Confederacies of Light, the Ascended Masters, and every kingdom of this planet for assistance. That is just to name a few of your resources. You are a member in good standing on this mission and we urge you to exercise your rights. This is not only for your protection; it is the very means by which higher dimensional energies can legitimately gain entry onto this plane.

As we have stated before, we do not invade. However, when a member of this mission has earned the status of Earthling by living it and then requests interdimensional intervention or support, we can legitimately answer that request without violating Universal Law. In this manner, our presence will continue to infiltrate this planet for the purpose of bringing it into alignment with the greater Universe of Light. We hope this information makes it clear that "E.T., phone home" is actually very sound advice.

*

The PLO and Armistice Day

The end of history should not be perceived as a frightening event. History has been the frightening event. Its end is the liberation that will exalt humanity, not strip it of its power. As the planetary ego aligns with Spirit, it will have no further need to defend itself against an enemy that does not exist. Nor will it have any use for carefully recording that process and then passing it on to future generations as an impaired model for them to imitate.

The Planetary Liberation Organization is here to cut an energetic pathway to a state of grace. In doing so, it will enable the planetary inhabitants to claim their freedom from both their national and their personal histories, as well as allow them to experience their true spiritual and physical wealth. The celebrations that marked the endings of your world wars will look like sedate little tea parties compared to the global celebration of true peace and liberation that will date the end of historic times.








NOTES:

This is a musical universe. Is the energy of contracts musical too? Writing a contract with more than one person is like composing a song with a friend. You end up with two or more variants, with no official versions.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOvH5LSH9Sw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOvH5LSH9Sw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yw_U6UfKVeM

bsbray
28th April 2015, 01:39
This is a pretty interesting formula for articulating intentions. Thanks for sharing CP. :)

Since this is along the theme of the "Declaration of Independence," which in the case of the US was written by Thomas Jefferson, I might take the opportunity to express my intention that everyone go back and consider the original idea of Jeffersonian republicanism: that the individual take the most responsibility for his own life and rights, followed by a priority of local government, then state government, and finally, ideally with the least influence of all upon daily life, the federal government. The idea is that we should not be dependent upon others for our happiness and other basic rights, and expecting them to be provided by the politicians located the farthest from you is the most unrealistic.

Daozen
28th April 2015, 01:48
This is a pretty interesting formula for articulating intentions. Thanks for sharing CP. :)

Since this is along the theme of the "Declaration of Independence," which in the case of the US was written by Thomas Jefferson, I might take the opportunity to express my intention that everyone go back and consider the original idea of Jeffersonian republicanism: that the individual take the most responsibility for his own life and rights, followed by a priority of local government, then state government, and finally, ideally with the least influence of all upon daily life, the federal government. The idea is that we should not be responsible upon others for our happiness and other basic rights, and expecting them to be provided by the politicians located the farthest from you is the most unrealistic.

I am happy to take suggestions. I agree that the US DOI was a foundational document, and mine is modelled on their writing.

My writing so far is a bit sloppy, as I accidentally clicked submit. The Gods are nudging my elbow... we are well behind schedule. It'll take me 48 hours to get this properly written. I will release more and more of the backstory as I draft.


I might take the opportunity to express my intention that everyone go back and consider the original idea of Jeffersonian republicanism: that the individual take the most responsibility for his own life and rights, followed by a priority of local government, then state government, and finally, ideally with the least influence of all upon daily life, the federal government.

I will add this. Winston Shrout reminded me of this progression. Is the original wording anywhere? I'll look now...

Daozen
28th April 2015, 01:57
Added your ideas bsbray. Cheers.

Edit: Been drafting this for 6 hours. Time to take a break.

bsbray
28th April 2015, 04:08
Oops, when you pasted what I posted, I realized I made a typo. :P

Should have been "The idea is that we should not be dependent upon others" instead of "responsible" upon others. My bad. :tiphat:

Daozen
28th April 2015, 15:16
Oops, when you pasted what I posted, I realized I made a typo. :P

Should have been "The idea is that we should not be dependent upon others" instead of "responsible" upon others. My bad. :tiphat:

Will change it.

genevieve
1st May 2015, 05:20
Contact Point--

I admit I haven't read your entire post--I'm on the verge of sleep. But I just wanted to suggest that rather than saying "I do not accept..." you might consider the words "I do not consent to...." Perhaps I'm being nitpicky, but for me the word consent feels stronger.

Anyhoo, well done, and thanks for sharing.

Peace Love Joy & Harmony,
genevieve

Daozen
1st May 2015, 13:02
Contact Point--

I admit I haven't read your entire post--I'm on the verge of sleep. But I just wanted to suggest that rather than saying "I do not accept..." you might consider the words "I do not consent to...." Perhaps I'm being nitpicky, but for me the word consent feels stronger.

Anyhoo, well done, and thanks for sharing.

Peace Love Joy & Harmony,
genevieve

Thanks. After rereading I realized there were multiple issues with the writing. It'll take me weeks to fix. I *encourage* people to pick me up on my wording, as there is a lot of finetuning to do...

Sheila
1st May 2015, 14:18
Contact Point--

I admit I haven't read your entire post--I'm on the verge of sleep. But I just wanted to suggest that rather than saying "I do not accept..." you might consider the words "I do not consent to...." Perhaps I'm being nitpicky, but for me the word consent feels stronger.

Anyhoo, well done, and thanks for sharing.

Peace Love Joy & Harmony,
genevieve

bradleyloves.wordpress.com has had me thinking along these very lines... I DO NOT CONSENT as this is a free will universe, "they" have to have our CONSENT even tacit consent to DO ANYTHING. He has posted some very interesting articles... The Great Con of Man https://bradleyloves.wordpress.com/2015/02/12/the-great-con-of-man-esoterics-the-supernatural-magicians-mind-control-and-the-new-world-order/

As always use your own discernment, I have found much of it resonates with what I have seen and read here.

Daozen
1st May 2015, 14:23
Tacit consent is a big, big problem. bradleyloves.wordpress.com looks long but I have studied writing along similar lines. I think even a barcode on items is supposedly a link to the negative grid.

Thanks for posting that Sheila... If there are any extracts worth reading I may post them here.

Sheila
1st May 2015, 14:28
Tacit consent is a big, big problem. bradleyloves.wordpress.com looks long but I have studied writing along similar lines. I think even a barcode on items is supposedly a link to the negative grid.

Thanks for posting that Sheila... If there are any extracts worth reading I may post them here.

Very welcome, I have to say that the article Great Con of Man is something I think could assist in "waking" some to at LEAST consider the idea that we have been sleeping "by design".

Daozen
4th May 2015, 00:09
Very welcome, I have to say that the article Great Con of Man is something I think could assist in "waking" some to at LEAST consider the idea that we have been sleeping "by design".

The problem is that it's too long, which will turn off 80-90 per cent of readers. Wordiness is an issue in alternative media... It's a shame that good writers shoot themselves in the foot by ignoring basic writing rules.

Daozen
4th May 2015, 00:11
This one is short, sharp, and to the point:

https://bradleyloves.wordpress.com/2015/05/02/it-is-our-consent-that-allows-it-all-to-continue/


IT IS OUR CONSENT THAT ALLOWS IT ALL TO CONTINUE
MAY 2, 2015 / 3 COMMENTS
Our continued “consent” to AUTHORITY…, to the status quo…, is what allows all of the suffering in the world to take place. It is NOT KARMA…, which brings suffering to other human beings…, that is NOT GOD’S WAY! It is our belief in separation that allows for this suffering to take place.

IF WE REMOVED OUR CONSENT…, if all of us simply put a stop to this…, then no one would be suffering. If we ourselves could put a stop to it…, the can someone please tell me HOW IT CAN BE KARMA that is causing the suffering?

If it is under “OUR” control to do something about it…, then how can we BLAME KARMA for horrible deeds happening on the planet still?

Is it possible…, just possible that WE ARE TO BLAME…, because we refuse to stop supporting a SYSTEM OF SLAVERY…, and a CRIMINALLY PSYCHOPATHIC LEADERSHIP?

Maybe instead of pointing the finger at all of the tens of thousands of boys and girls who have recently died in Iraq, Ukraine, Syria, Yemen, and Gaza…., we should be pointing the finger at our own UNWILLINGNESS to stop all support for a system that is nothing more than a SLAVE SYSTEM.

If we can’t do that…, then it is not GOD’S FAULT…, it is OUR FAULT…, for being cowards…, and for not finding the courage to call a spade a spade…, and to truly identify where the real problem was.

WE STOPPED CARING ABOUT EACH OTHER!

Daozen
5th May 2015, 06:58
Universal Law 1.0

This thread is now the main internet dialogue point between myself and the universe. As many governmental laws are fraudulent, I do not recognize them, and therefore will not be submitting any 'documents' concerning my sovereignty to fraudulent organisations. Governments, their attendant military organisations, and the clandestine groups controlling them, are hereby null and void. I claim full dominion over my timeline.

If any government or military organisation wishes to contest this, let them contest it here, in writing, publicly, within 96 hours. If they do not contest Universal Law 1.0 within 96 hours, under the rules of tacit procuration, it becomes my universal law in my sovereign timeline. As every human is the highest authority, alongside our living creator, in their own personal timeline, all the above shadowy agencies are rendered null and void.

Signed,

Contact Point

02:58 pm 5th May, 2015. Taipei.

http://www.lawfulrebellion.org/2009/11/23/get-government-to-lawfully-agree-that-youre-not-a-person-subject-to-acts/

Daozen
5th May 2015, 07:04
Note: It's also about withdrawing energy from these organisations. More later...

Daozen
6th May 2015, 08:04
Note: Tacit Procuration of Surrender. Is it possible?

Daozen
6th May 2015, 08:05
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZaR1vzMyR1M

Daozen
6th May 2015, 08:43
Preamble:

Universal Law 1.0

This thread is now the main internet dialogue point between myself and the universe. As many governmental laws are fraudulent, I do not recognize them, and therefore will not be submitting any 'documents' concerning my sovereignty to fraudulent organisations. Governments, their attendant military organisations, and the clandestine groups controlling them, are hereby null and void. I claim full dominion over my timeline.

If any government or military organisation wishes to contest this, let them contest it here, in writing, publicly, within 96 hours. If they do not contest Universal Law 1.0 within 96 hours, under the rules of tacit procuration, it becomes my universal law in my sovereign timeline. As every human is the highest authority, alongside our living creator, in their own personal timeline, all the above shadowy agencies are rendered null and void.

Signed,

Contact Point

02:58 pm 5th May, 2015. Taipei.

http://www.lawfulrebellion.org/2009/...bject-to-acts/



NEW LAW (drafting in progress)

Universal Law 1.2

I claim dominion over my timeline, and the Earth/Universe I live in. There is no higher law than a human, living on Gaia/Earth, co-creating his reality alongside the infinite creator.

This immutable law is made with reference to the following facts:

1. The current planetary elite (hereafter the Cabal) are occupying their positions with unlawful military force.

2. Credible alternatives to the current system have been offered:

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread500968/pg1

3. The Cabal/occupying governments are composed of a large number of individuals accused and convicted of crimes such as pedophilia, child abuse, and financial fraud:

http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/Two-More-Ex-Government-Ministers-Linked-to-UK-Pedophile-Ring-20141229-0009.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/24/british-lawmaker-tom-watson-prime-minister-pedophile-ring_n_2010912.html
http://rt.com/uk/238825-thatcher-ignored-mp-pedophile/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_sexual_abuse_cases

4. Occupying governments are attempting to erode the national sovereignty of the UK, Taiwan, and many other nations in closed door dealings that often violate the written constitution of their respective countries.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilderberg_Group

With reference to the above-mentioned facts, I hereby declare my Universal law that all governments are fraudulent, and know that they are rendered militarily, technologically powerless. I demand they rebut these accusations, or surrender unconditionally within 96 hours. If they do not rebut these accusations publicly, on this thread, I will consider their silence an admission of guilt, and therefore unconditional surrender.

I petition the aid of the highest universal forces to aid me in this, including The Agartha Network, the Angels and Saints, the many constellations and Source itself.

I will not file this law with any fraudulent, defunct institutions. I will not send courtesy notices, or use my given name, as occupying governments are proven to be of mistrustful and violent character, and an unctuous nature.

(This law is subject to redrafting and clarification)

With thanks,

Contact Point, a Sovereign on Earth.

6th May 4:40pm, Taipei,

Amended

6th May, 4:45pm Taipei,
6th May, 5:39pm Taipei,

Daozen
7th May 2015, 11:50
I hereby withdraw all my energy, loosh and consent from the banking, military and political system.

Signed, Contact Point, a Sovereign being on Earth.

7th May, 07:46pm, Taipei.

*

Note: When I use language like Dominion or Sovereign, I am not intending to put myself above anyone, except fraudulent governments and their attendant institutions.

Every single human and organism on Earth has the option to gain dominion and sovereignty over their personal timeline. This is about taking control of my life and destiny, and dismantling the fraudulent legal architecture that has grown up around us. Every single human being is the highest authority, alongside the Creator, in their personal life and timeline, whether they acknowledge that or not. I will no longer be pushed around and manipulated by shadowy groups. They've got their timeline, I've got mine.

Daozen
7th May 2015, 13:25
Note: I'll be writing some contracts and personal timeline laws at home, they carry equal weight to my posts here. As occupying governments are fraudulent and illegitimate, I am under no obligation to post anything publicly here. If they wish to obtain a copy of anything I've written, they can PM me or request it publicly here. Thanks...

Contact Point,

Taipei...

Daozen
6th June 2015, 17:57
Response to the Ruiner:

I was sleeping this afternoon, I felt I went straight into the upper Etheric realm instead of getting caught in the trap layers. Went right into Game of Thrones territory...

I think the grid has been slowly dissolving of its own accord over the last few years and months, anyway.

I guess it will get easier to astral project as the grid dissolves. It's getting easier to drift into the right hemisphere every day.

I don't like it when people ask time-frame questions, but are the Draco set to leave this summer? My understanding is that they were supposed to leave years ago, but it has been delayed... The first date my teacher gave me was Aug 2010. He said in Dec 2009 that "They" would leave in "eight months". He did not specify who "They" were, but I could tell it would be a momentous event.

I think a lot of this game is about ignoring them, weaving our own future, and letting love dissolve the illusory bindings.

*

We don't have to accept any planetary "King" or "Owner". We never gave our explicit consent. It was tricked out of us by stealth and implication. I don't see any counter-signed proof of ownership delivered to me in physicality. I never agreed to be owned. Neither did my family. I hereby *foreclose* upon and dissolve the office of King, and claim my own timeline and future. I do NOT consent to being controlled by self-appointed "owners of Earth" or any interplanetary USI sufferers.

Unless I receive a counter-signed proof of ownership of Earth, emailed to me, or posted on this blog, within 24 hours (0148am Sunday 7th June), their ownership is voided. I will consider no response to this post as tacit consent to my intention.

(NOTE: Yes readers, my writing looks odd, but there is a >big< legal aspect to this. We are the plantation workers who made a cross on a contract we couldn't read. I was trained in this in Indonesia)

I ask all the star nations and supporting civilizations to observe this intention.

Arise, Earth

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PukuQPUKfyU

Thanks,

Contact Point

sandy
6th June 2015, 20:40
Love it Contact Point >>>>>>>>>>authority is all in the mind, detach from it and stop playing anyone's game, who deems they have authority over You!! It is You who decides whether to acquiesce or not and the more one is aware they make this choice the sooner one's decisions become about personal power and integrity IMHO. :smile2:

Daozen
9th June 2015, 06:12
Thanks Sandy. I was rushed when I wrote those posts. I'll get a better draft up sometime...

lcam88
11th June 2015, 15:07
I like your intentions with the creation of such a declaration. I may be going off topic but I'd like to address 2 issues that come to mind upon reading.

1. Citizen is (amongst other things) a title of nobility. I venture that it carries with it a pledge to servitude and fiduciary obligation; moreover this title is special when compared with other titles like Sargent, Prime Minister or Pastor in that it lends absolutely no privilege or power to further serve the implied allegiance otherwise associated with most other titles. For me, rather than an affirmation to being a citizen, I would rather affirm nationalism if social affirmation was indeed something important to me.

2. Some years back, a distinction between human-being and person was made to me. The prior being a natural god-created being where the latter is more akin to a record identified by name and number in some governmental arquive, a persona of sorts people wear as though it where a part of them. It is fitting, while we are making such a distinction, that in the United States at least, the definition of "person" is likened to a corporation and as such an "insular possession" of the federal organization. A birth certificate and Social Security applications are records that link the human-being to the person entity in each case and ironically it is the parents of newborns who surrender sovereignty of the newborn human-being so to accept benefits offered by the state. One such benefit is the aforementioned title of nobility.

With that understanding, I have a private contract that has been notarized, witnessed by at least 2 other sovereigns, and signed by me and the government created persona, declaring terms between my human self and the government created person wherein, amongst other things, the person has willingly surrendered all value held by or for the trust of the person over to the responsibility of the true sovereign and unalienable human-being, the actual surety and backing of the person. I also declare a new name by which the real human-being may be separately identified from the other. The importance of this contract being private is obviously evident, I presume. Its validity in law is actually backed by a constitutional right: The unlimited right to contract.

Daozen
12th June 2015, 10:40
Some subtle and interesting points there. I agree it needs refining.


The importance of this contract being private is obviously evident, I presume. Its validity in law is actually backed by a constitutional right: The unlimited right to contract.

I never thought of that.

lcam88
12th June 2015, 14:38
If you are interested in the above contract, there is a small detail I omitted from the above that would call into contention the validity of a document stating only terms I divulged above. A contract requires an _exchange_ of consideration between two parties (amongst other things like a date and signatures), a paper merely declaring the surrender of assets (or liabilities) that contains no mention of some type of retribution to the transaction would be found to be invalid by any court. Many documents contain vague phrases like "due consideration" or symbolic monetary exchanges of $1.00 to fulfill that legal requirement.

I'm not a lawyer, but IMO everyone should know how to read and evaluate a contract when one is offered to them for signing. And under such circumstances, it is perfectly ok to modify or add terms with a blue or black pen if you should feel the need to; such a modification constitutes a counter-offer to the offeree. Whether your modified version is then accepted in place of the original is a separate offer/acceptance.

And lastly, signed documents are actually memorializations of contracts. It is perfectly ok to contract verbally by a meeting of the minds (agreement); the memorialization creates a record that can then be verified in case of later disagreements. As an individual human-being, verbal contracts I make have as much weight to me as those with memorializations, perhaps more in a way, because verbal contracts are made with other human-beings and not a corporation or persona of some kind.

In general, declarations are actually more similar to affidavits or statements of fact made by one or more individuals. If you think it's useful, I can put up a model of the above contract; if memory serves its purpose is related to the creation of a relationship between an individual sovereign (a surety), and the beneficiary (the person) who also happens to be an agent for the trustee (the government that extends benefits to the beneficiary in the form of a Social Security card and citizenship etc). Perhaps it would be useful because then the Declaration you are making can be signed by an actual sovereign individual rather than mere citizens.

Please pardon me for the off-topic. I'll say no more unless you see the topic worth discussing more.

Daozen
16th June 2015, 03:40
If you are interested in the above contract, there is a small detail I omitted from the above that would call into contention the validity of a document stating only terms I divulged above. A contract requires an _exchange_ of consideration between two parties (amongst other things like a date and signatures), a paper merely declaring the surrender of assets (or liabilities) that contains no mention of some type of retribution to the transaction would be found to be invalid by any court. Many documents contain vague phrases like "due consideration" or symbolic monetary exchanges of $1.00 to fulfill that legal requirement.

I'm not a lawyer, but IMO everyone should know how to read and evaluate a contract when one is offered to them for signing. And under such circumstances, it is perfectly ok to modify or add terms with a blue or black pen if you should feel the need to; such a modification constitutes a counter-offer to the offeree. Whether your modified version is then accepted in place of the original is a separate offer/acceptance.

And lastly, signed documents are actually memorializations of contracts. It is perfectly ok to contract verbally by a meeting of the minds (agreement); the memorialization creates a record that can then be verified in case of later disagreements. As an individual human-being, verbal contracts I make have as much weight to me as those with memorializations, perhaps more in a way, because verbal contracts are made with other human-beings and not a corporation or persona of some kind.

In general, declarations are actually more similar to affidavits or statements of fact made by one or more individuals. If you think it's useful, I can put up a model of the above contract; if memory serves its purpose is related to the creation of a relationship between an individual sovereign (a surety), and the beneficiary (the person) who also happens to be an agent for the trustee (the government that extends benefits to the beneficiary in the form of a Social Security card and citizenship etc). Perhaps it would be useful because then the Declaration you are making can be signed by an actual sovereign individual rather than mere citizens.

Please pardon me for the off-topic. I'll say no more unless you see the topic worth discussing more.

Thanks. I have that saved and will put in in my long term draw. There's nothing off-topic, this needs to get done.

Cheers.

*

The Flaming Lips - Life On Mars


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fBGDdj6fOiM

Daozen
17th June 2015, 08:32
Planetary Liens - Putting it all together.


*


"Every human has an unlimited right to contract with infinity..."- Contact Point/(inspired by lcam88)

"Your Earth is a very small part of a very large industry." Kalique Abrasax


*




We know from the Red Dragon Ambassador that Keenan and co are somehow able to hold up the changeover process.

We know from American Kabuki that Keenan was mad as hell that Heather put a lien on the Gold and related accounts. If she really was delusional, why get mad at her?


AK on Neil Keenan


My final word on this topic of tantrums

I've been saying for a long time that I refuse to give my energy and attention to soap operas, but I woke up this morning and felt that this needed to be addressed- if only for the final closure. As soon as I got onto Skype I was met with yet another tantrum and I knew that yes, once and for all, I would address all of this drama.

*


I'll preface this with saying that I couldn't be bothered listening to the video- just as I couldn't be bothered watching any of the other videos that Neil is suddenly pumping out (after months of silence)

*


Keenan: An extended interview with Neil Keenan in Jakarta, Indonesia, in which he reveals just what a dangerous game the One People’s Public Trust (OPPT) was attempting to play with people’s lives and freedom – not only in Indonesia, but around the world.

AK:


The One People's Public Trust, or OPPT as it's called, is now defunct, as are all "trusts" globally. We discussed this last night on the radio show. OPPT did what it was suppose to do and now has been put to bed. The OPPT filings released every single Being on this planet (and beyond) from slavery and insured that each and everyone of us is now FREE. No "playing", just real DO'ing. The Trustees did their job and have now... retired, for lack of a better term.

*side note... and I'm beginning to feel like a broken record on this: -IF people don't agree with the OPPT Filings, then step up to the plate and rebut them- line by line.

If you don't think they were done properly, then REBUT them. If you don't think they Do what they DID, then REBUT THEM. Fully, Transparently, with Absolute Data. REBUT THEM. I don't wanna hear your opinion, I don't wanna hear tantrums or listen to people claim they are bullshit and are wrong and that they have no meaning. REBUT THEM.


re·but
/riˈbət/
Verb
Claim or prove that (evidence or an accusation) is false.
Drive back or repel (a person or attack).
Synonyms
refute - confute - disprove - deny - negative - repulse

*

http://americankabuki.blogspot.tw/2013/04/removing-shackles-my-final-word-on-this.html

*


We know that people like Adan Sakli were stepping forward claiming to hold all the accounts for Earth.


“If I had wanted to behave like a King or an Emperor, they could have understood that. Because I want to give the power that I have back to the people, that they cannot understand”! – Adnan Sakli, holder of the Global Accounts

Adnan Sakli died on the 27th of February 2014 (corrected time of death). Although the immediate cause of his death may or may not be called “natural”, the real cause of death was attrition created by social parasites that wish to enslave humanity. The people of this planet have lost a good friend and brave “White Knight” they did not know existed. His position at the top of the economic pyramid of power has been a well-kept secret. He alone was the holder of the sovereign titles of all nations, corporations, central banks and currencies. He alone was, “PRIME” as a signatory and as a target.

*


Malik and Heather both interacted with Adnan before he died:


March 19, 2014

In 1987 the World Bank- World Banking System went bankrupt, so did all the global central bank system. Ony one person in the world had enough liquidity to take ownership of the Bank of International Settlements (BIS). uNDER WHAT IS TERMED “The International Reserve Solvency Regulations”, all sovereign bonds, commercial loans and ownership of all ccentral banks were collected in the same account in BIS. The man who became owner of BIS and of all other accounts is ADNAN SAKLI &8217. That is how ADNAN SAKLI & 8217 became the underwriter of the World, Master Trader. The Sovereign, Prime, ETC any name people want to put to it.

Adnan Sakli has spent the next 26 years to get them to work with him to fix the issues and help the people. However with all the illegal things done they were all afraid, traders were all afraid to enter ADNAN SAKLI & 8217 or they get fired or they dissappered. This was the si-fi movie no one could make up.


*


We know that Malik Hughes cooperated with Neil, Drake and David Wilcock...


How did OPPT first get the idea they might access the Accounts? One contact was with Mr. Malik Hughes, a key ally of Mr. Keenan’s with the Qing Dynasty office, who informed us that OPPT reached out to him to try to determine if they could reach the mysterious “Madam Wu.” The real Madam Wu is dead. The phony one (a mid-level bank functionary in China) has had to deeply apologize to the Empress several times for presumption, in hopes of avoiding retribution.

*


We know that Malik Hughes confirmed with Heather that there was an off world component to this. Malik (a colleague of Wilcock and Keenan, and a key mover behind the 2011-2013 collateral accounts grab) wanted to set up a meeting with Heather. Note, who's calling who:


REPORTEDLY: Adnan Sakli purports to be the owner of BIS and most of what exists on the planet.
Malik Hughes purports to be the representative of the Qing Dynasty, the servant of the Empress, and from another planet...Malik and Adnan appparently know each other. Mike Cechanowicz, who asked me to speak with Adnan...I don't even remember when that was, but it was over three hours of Adnan explaining his position and power...asked me to speak with Malik Hughes...right before Loie transitioned, so it did not happen when they wanted...about a week after that I finally was able to return the call and skypes....and Malik spent time explaining his/their position and power....then after that, it was revealed by Keenan/Dunn that they were working with Malik and the purported Qing Dynasty...like one big extended family, which I knew about before finally taking the first call with Malik, but was interested in how transparent every one would be with the people, the universe...which wasn't much to begin with...NOW? They BE DO'ing their part in the final moment of THE finale! I love them!!!! I send them big hugs and kisses with absolute love, gratitude and peace.





Jarrafusa 3:30 PM
On 4/3/13, at 7:30 AM, Mike Cechanowicz wrote:

Hello Heather. I have had some contact with Malik Hughes. He and adnan know each other - they have talked today, not that -Adnan agrees so much quit yet - but we do agree we need to talk, to see how we can cooperate towards our common agendas - the ones everybody is using energy talking about but not yet enough doing. Tell me when you can be on for a conferance call and Ill send that through the channels.


Jarrafusa
[4/3/2013 7:52:05 AM] Mike Cechanowicz: [4/3/13 4:51:16 PM] malik hughes: Smiley))
[4/3/13 4:51:42 PM] malik hughes: Send her good tidings from the Great Qing Dynasty. Smiley

[4/3/2013 8:15:09 AM] Mike Cechanowicz: Ya - lets just push the wave.
[4/3/2013 8:18:43 AM] Mike Cechanowicz: Contact received from Mike Cechanowicz
[4/3/2013 8:18:55 AM] Mike Cechanowicz: Malik Would like you to call.

Heather, This is not a time for spiritual poetry, and abstract language. I have Malik on the line. You say you will call, but never do. to say one thing and do another is not the hallmark of honesty, the truth or fact. So lets cut the bullshit and get real. Call Malik and listen to him instead of drowning him. me or others with hyper-meta-abstractions. Love is to extend self to others for the purpose of long term development. Sometimes it means to communicate directly. Its only meant to help.

[4/4/2013 5:12:47 PM] Jarrafusa: hhhhmmm...an inconvenience for you I am sure. My mother past away yesterday, Mike. I did take and do take a few moments to just BE. While I DO that....Perhaps you can all help each other.

*


Jarrafusa 3:40 PM

REPORTEDLY: Adnan Sakli purports to be the owner of BIS and most of what exists on the planet.
Malik Hughes purports to be the representative of the Qing Dynasty, the servant of the Empress, and from another planet...Malik and Adnan appparently know each other. Mike Cechanowicz, who asked me to speak with Adnan...I don't even remember when that was, but it was over three hours of Adnan explaining his position and power...asked me to speak with Malik Hughes...right before Loie transitioned, so it did not happen when they wanted...about a week after that I finally was able to return the call and skypes....and Malik spent time explaining his/their position and power....then after that, it was revealed by Keenan/Dunn that they were working with Malik and the purported Qing Dynasty...like one big extended family, which I knew about before finally taking the first call with Malik, but was interested in how transparent every one would be with the people, the universe...which wasn't much to begin with...NOW? They BE DO'ing their part in the final moment of THE finale! I love them!!!! I send them big hugs and kisses with absolute love, gratitude and peace.

*


American Kabuki
4/21/13 7:02 AM

(Big smile) I knew what you meant. All Eternal Essence embodied now move to bring the absolute moment of NOW, some consciously some unconsciously (and that frustrates the hell out them) that even their resistance accelerates the plan that existed from before the experiment began. They have played their roles so well they forgot who they were and believed they were the roles they played on the stage of the illusion of duality.
1:39 PM

Through your contacts can you find out what there is to find about the "Rizq Treaty" or "Treaty of Rizq" Appears to be an annauki treaty that the Qinq dyansty uses to justify their claim they own all gold on the Earth and all the Human beings on the earth.
1:44 PM

The aid to the Empress admitted he's from planet Rizq in Orion. Also admits to having multiple "divines" use his embodiment. Such a strange person. Quite a remarkable admission.






Malik Hughes in a conversation with Heather made this startling admission:


[12:06:23 PM] malik hughes: Dark energy is the key
[12:06:35 PM] malik hughes: Embracing that which we are made of
[12:06:44 PM] malik hughes: Smiley we made contact
[12:07:36 PM] malik hughes: The Indonesian "royals" don't own asset, they are gatekeepers
[12:09:48 PM] malik hughes: Gold DNA goes to Qing
[12:12:36 PM] malik hughes: Do you know of the star gates (Smiley)
[12:13:49 PM] malik hughes: ???
[12:14:04 PM] malik hughes: Or the Rizq Treaty
[12:14:06 PM] malik hughes: Lol
[12:14:09 PM] malik hughes: (Winking)
[12:14:36 PM] malik hughes: Or the 7 cities of Oro?
[12:14:58 PM] malik hughes: We are the keepers of the forbidden cities
[1:14:29 PM] Jarrafusa: Malik, how many work through your embodiment? I see at least four...
[1:14:39 PM] Jarrafusa: (Heart)
[1:14:48 PM] malik hughes: It's not mine
[1:14:52 PM] malik hughes: It's theirs
[1:15:03 PM] malik hughes: Everyone and thing on earth
[1:15:09 PM] malik hughes: We are the origin
[1:15:15 PM] malik hughes: The start
[1:15:21 PM] malik hughes: (Heart)
[1:16:04 PM] malik hughes: We have world constitution signed by 70 mm Winking
[1:16:17 PM] malik hughes: Each one has the duty to help another
[1:16:26 PM] malik hughes: Virus can spread so can love
[1:16:37 PM] malik hughes: We ALL have a mandate
[1:16:41 PM] Jarrafusa: I love you....absolute gratitude, love, peace and GRACE
[1:16:49 PM] malik hughes: I love you too
[1:16:56 PM] malik hughes: That's why I'm a bit sad
[1:18:09 PM] Jarrafusa: why are you sad?
[1:18:47 PM] malik hughes: Because I think you are missing one page. I'm trying to share it but you seem to not get it
[1:19:01 PM] malik hughes: We hate the fighting
[1:19:12 PM] malik hughes: We as a people have real enemies
[1:19:22 PM] malik hughes They have now been replaced
[1:19:24 PM] Jarrafusa: then post the page here so that I can know that which you refer to.
[1:19:31 PM] malik hughes: Operation phantom
[1:19:45 PM] malik hughes: It's unwritten
[1:19:48 PM] malik hughes: We must talk
[1:20:16 PM] malik hughes: They have arrived from their location
[1:20:28 PM] malik hughes: I am from rizq
[1:21:11 PM] Jarrafusa:
malik wrote: "Gold DNA goes to Qing…"

*

I HAVE NOT CHECKED THIS UFO DATABASE LINK:

http://ufoaliendatabase.wikia.com/wiki/Rizq

*

Let's examine this revelation...

*



[1:20:28 PM] malik: I am from [planet] Rizq

This would make Malik an Annunaki according this web site: http://ufoaliendatabase.wikia.com/wiki/Rizq. Malik is Keenan's contact in the Qinq Dynasty. He's also been talking to Heather. He's been trying to play Keenan and Heather off on each other and roundly trashing Swissindo as mere "gatekeepers". This is now what Keenan is ignorantly parroting on his recent video. More on this later...

There's also a curious graphic Drake posted that the Annauki are creators of humanity (THEY ARE NOT!). Pictured below is the bottom portion of the graphic image which does not show in text searches on Google since its in a graphic image.

*


The Sons of Elohim are the Bene Elohim, who left behind the Annunaki (who were not true Elohim but genetic descendants like us).

The Elohim also created humanity along with the Bene Elohim. The Annunaki chose to enslave humanity because of our angelic [DNA] inheritance. They chose to disempower us so that we would not be the inheritors of our true destiny.


The Annunaki believe they are our gods and therefore have all rights to gold and the human beings on the planet as their property. And they have behaved that way and treated us as slaves to exploit.

All beings are Eternal Essence, none are superior to another embodiment of Eternal Essence. No other embodiment owns another embodiment. -AK]

*

http://americankabuki.blogspot.tw/2013/04/the-crew-from-planet-rizq-is-not-coming.html

*


We know form the early OPPT calls that harvesting was going on. Heather was one of the first people ever to talk about the the etheric harvesting. She said it was going on off world, and the elders frequently changed leadership on Earth and just carried on through the next planetary proxy.

*


Malik Hughes, who was behind Drake, Keenan and Wilcock, was an admitted illuminist.


This video is the key to understanding the whole mystery. If you can get past the chatter, there are many clues inside:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=datoqRIZCzU


We know from Cobra that the internal fighting among the Dragon's has held up the planetary liberation process.


Now the Ruiner and David Wilcock have confirmed the harvesting.


We know from the Ruiner that there will a be a changeover in Autumn, but that doesn't mean we are free. We just get some breathing space, and a new game begins. Hopefully a little easier, but there will still be choices...

*


So: The Red Dragon Ambassador knows Keenan is a hassle, who is conencted to Wilcock. Keenan, Drake and Wilcock are connected to Malik Hughes, an admitted illuminist. We know that all Keenan and Malik wanted to contact Heather and the OPPT, Keenan got mad on Skype, Malik had an eye-opening conversation with her. Keenan was aware of the significance of the collateral accounts. The Ruiner, David Wilcock and Jupiter Ascending all confirm the existence of the harvesting mechanism...

*


Ed
4/21/13 12:29 AM

Yes , you are right, I have met some 5D Chinese weirdos , some fly, go through walls , shapeshift , some even have horns, others are very, very old ( 1,000's of yrs old ) ...but they do rub shoulders with the Cabal ...they seem to be in bed together ...playing both sides , true deceivers ...that is why the Chinese dynasties have lasted for so long unbroken, very smart group , always trying to perpetuate the current slave system with very cleaver & subtle strategies , always using foreigners to represent them & do their dirty job everywhere, because of their wealth , always behind the curtains, never get their hands dirty, they are an important & solid part of the foundation of the slave system, but so few people knows & understands this, and they want to keep it that way while promoting they are creating a New Age of enlightenment for humanity.
4/21/13 12:36 AM

We have finally reached THE crossroad , and we are living such difficult times , so many receivers and so few to be trusted , B.S meter at Max dear brother and discernment at its highest ever please. Very difficult referencing who is who / what nowadays : (

*


And we know that Heather caused a massive stir. They wanted to contact her, NOT the other way round. We know that Winston Shrout and Lawful Rebellion have a piece of the puzzle.

And we know a human being has an unlimited right to contract with infinity, and write Liens.

End of Part One.

Daozen
17th June 2015, 08:54
icam88, maybe you could teach us about liens. I only know what I know from half remembered Winston Shrout videos and Lawful rebellion podcasts. If you have time, any information or pointers/links are appreciated. Cheers.

Daozen
17th June 2015, 09:23
Part II: In Indonesia: Listening to Jupiter Ascending Through a Wall.

Some random fragments from face to face physical conversations, mainly in 2010/2011.


The power that is controlling this planet will not leave until you guys get your project running.


They want you to stop drinking.

Why?

Because you must focus on the project.

Why? Is it important?

More than you know.


Many people in this town signed a contract with the dark side.

OK.

They want your group to help them break the contract.

Will the dark power get angry if we help break the contract?

Yes, but the people you release will protect you.

Why do they want our group to do it?

Because you have sponsorship.

From who?

(Silence) Please just help them write a new contract.



When they see the group sponsoring you, they will think it's a miracle.

Why?

Because this group verrry rarely gets involved in affairs here.



Why do they want to work with us?

You will work with them, and make something better.


Have you worked out where this group are from yet?

No. Can't you say?

No. I can't say.

Are they from near, or far?

Near.

Even those conversations have been sanitized.

Daozen
17th June 2015, 09:44
Part III. Liens?

I know from other conversations that galactic abuse of laws is part of this. Jupiter Ascending and The Ruiner confirmed and expanded on what I had learned in the past.

I know they are afraid of Liens. I'm sure they are something that can disrupt the whole process.

The OPPT did more than people think. But the OPPT say "It's done." It's not done. It's not done until we are partying in the streets, and we go to a true organic timeline, not a matrix positive timeline. They made a huge crack in the mechanism, but it's not over yet.

How do we file liens?

Against who?

In what court?

Where is the best OPPT information about this? Where are the videos about the harvesting and the deception. They are in the early conversations, but where?

In Indonesia, we just wrote them on paper, and that was considered ratified. They said the soul group we were part of could do it, but only a small percentage of them had woken up...

So... now to investigate liens. Any ideas are welcome.

To be continued.

Daozen
17th June 2015, 10:43
Lien links:

Winston Shrout on OPPT liens.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGjfKnAjnNI

Heather responds to Winston:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hY5WWliZCzA

http://shiftshaper.org/freeatlast/2013/02/08/oppt-ucc-filings-under-attack-in-nebraska/

http://americankabuki.blogspot.tw/2013/03/oppt-to-all-people-of-planet.html

http://www.zengardner.com/winston-shrout-truth-about-oppt-ucc-filing/

HARVESTING

https://angellucci.wordpress.com/2013/03/24/oppt-summary-by-simon-palmer/

WINSTON SHROUT ON LIENS

http://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/viewtopic.php?t=9329

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYSVq5_Hk2Q

https://www.wssic.com/

DAVID WILCOCK ON LIENS:

http://divinecosmos.com/start-here/davids-blog/1051-g7banks


LAWFUL REBELLION ON LIENS


HARVESTING AND PRIVATE COURTS

http://removingtheshackles.blogspot.tw/2013/03/oppt-questions-answers-march-5th.html

http://www.lawfulrebellion.org/2009/11/23/get-government-to-lawfully-agree-that-youre-not-a-person-subject-to-acts/

WHO CAN PUT A LIEN ON A BANK ACCOUNT?

http://www.ehow.com/info_8567208_can-put-lien-bank-account.html

MIRROR LOANS

http://pn.i-uv.com/courtesy-notices/

HEATHER OPPT ON THE ENERGETIC GRID:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=is1dsy94AKQ

lcam88
17th June 2015, 14:51
icam88, maybe you could teach us about liens. I only know what I know from half remembered Winston Shrout videos and Lawful rebellion podcasts. If you have time, any information or pointers/links are appreciated. Cheers.

Dear Contact Point:

I am honored by the offer you extend. I'll dig up the model of the contact between my person and my human self, and as we move along, let's see what makes sense to consider and decide what directions are worth moving in.

Originally the aforementioned contract, it was part of a process of perfecting a legal claim. It was to be followed by submission of UCC1 form (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UCC-1_financing_statement) followed by notice of fault and default (notarized with a bill of lading and sent by certified or registered mail etc etc). The packet created would be the perfected claim that would be almost irrefutable in a court of law.

The problem we have been having with these types of perfected legal claims, which are very similar to your tacit procuration of surrender in a way, is actually enforcing the terms. From memory Winston Shrout has some level of success in his actions as he was in possession of the bond number of a standing judge and managed to gain some level of traction, they disbanded the judge at the end, if memory serves. There was a case in North Carolina, now sealed, where two brother successfully engaged a bank on the basis of Commercial Law, but because of the procedures involved, they spent over 12 months in jail while they made their case. In history we have much evidence of military options being utilized because no other option of enforcement could be practically leveraged.

So while learning about liens and perfecting legal claims to back the liens is well worth the results in terms of knowledge, the practical side of utilizing these means for ends against the powers that be are rather more meek and certainly very very hard indeed. I liken the undertaking to going All-In in a poker game knowing you have the winning hand, in context of a Murphy's law that states: A 44 beats 4 aces. How far are you willing to go? Are you going to take the judge up under contempt of court, who is going to oversee that? We have found that courts are not actually honorable when faced with a case between a plaintiff holding a perfect claim and a bank, they uphold the status quo and not the contract in every one of the more than 50 occasions we tried. Regardless, this knowledge is very interesting indeed, and perhaps still very useful, especially in context of what Contact Point is doing.

To understand the basis of authority that underpin a perfected legal claim, it is necessary to know the basics: Maxims of law, legal definitions, and Commercial Law (sometimes referred to as Maritime Law or Law of the sea: https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc). Perhaps the most important basic tool you need is a legal dictionary. I recommend Blacks Law, and get a recent version as well as one that was published before 1933 when the Federal Reserve Act was enacted, definitions about money changed at that time. In fact many of the definitions have been changed to suite the more modern legal statutes than Commercial Law, I see it fitting to specify the exact definition by reference only, from one of these dictionaries where it suites me.

The Maxims of Law, normally written in latin, are also published in the dictionaries along with their translations. They are much like logical concrete positions which are conclusions based on application of Law of Thought that can be made in abstract circumstances where argument or conflict arise. They are normally presumed in court, but reference made to them where fitting will certainly carry a requirement to consideration equivalent to fact. It was said to me, that they are the foundation by which all reason and law are based.

Daozen
17th June 2015, 22:09
Thanks for a good breakdown. I was hazy on all those details.

Re: "How far do you want to take it?" There are some issues:

1) Do I even consider the current system valid? i.e. Do I need to submit a form to an illegal legal entity? I'd prefer to write an affadavit voiding any claims they have.
2) You can contract with infinity itself, which supersedes ALL other legal entities.
3) We experienced concrete, legitimate, verified success with contracts pinned to the wall. We are being watched. Higher dimensional courts are real.
4) Interesting that you picked up on the Tacit procuration of surrender. Have you heard the stories of judges being terrified of liens?
5) I am just going to write something once, and maybe post it online, but nothing more. I refuse to interact with the UCC system, except to void it.
6) I will add a petition/poll element. These things are noticed too.

So I am almost coming from a magic angle. Magic, in this case, means a system of laws invisible to us that we can still interact with.

So... what would be the best document: Voiding out all their legal claims to Earth? Putting a Lien on the entire harvesting system? Lets get fictional here. They're fictional too.

The Legal terms I'm looking at are: Void, Tacit Procuration, an Affadavit affirming freedom?, and large scale liens.

Heather did something. She had them all running around. This is documented on line.

Best Wishes,

Daozen
17th June 2015, 22:12
Now tell me what a court is.

Why do I have to go to their court? You are tacitly validating them by accepting and approaching their system. Can I open my own court? What do I need for a court? A gavel and a wig? What else?

I am not naive enough to think one judgement could change things overnight, but SOMETHING is going on.

We are all working together and eroding this system from our own special angles.

Daozen
17th June 2015, 22:15
Gandhi said, “There is a higher court than the courts of justice and that is the court of conscience. It supercedes all other courts.”

Forget about all the revisionist arguments about Gandhi. No one was perfect. Look at that quote. Is that just a metaphor, or is a coded reference to a higher court?

All I know is they took this stuff very seriously in Indonesia.

Daozen
17th June 2015, 22:19
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court

Court
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For other uses, see Court (disambiguation).

A trial at the Old Bailey in London as drawn by Thomas Rowlandson and Augustus Pugin for Ackermann's Microcosm of London (1808–11).
A court is a tribunal, often as governmental institution, with the authority to adjudicate legal disputes between parties and carry out the administration of justice in civil, criminal, and administrative matters in accordance with the rule of law.[1] In both common law and civil law legal systems, courts are the central means for dispute resolution, and it is generally understood that all persons have an ability to bring their claims before a court. Similarly, the rights of those accused of a crime include the right to present a defense before a court.

The system of courts that interprets and applies the law is collectively known as the judiciary. The place where a court sits is known as a venue. The room where court proceedings occur is known as a courtroom, and the building as a courthouse; court facilities range from simple and very small facilities in rural communities to large buildings in cities.

The practical authority given to the court is known as its jurisdiction (Latin jus dicere) – the court's power to decide certain kinds of questions or petitions put to it. According to William Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England, a court is constituted by a minimum of three parties: the actor or plaintiff, who complains of an injury done; the reus or defendant, who is called upon to make satisfaction for it, and the judex or judicial power, which is to examine the truth of the fact, to determine the law arising upon that fact, and, if any injury appears to have been done, to ascertain and by its officers to apply a legal remedy. It is also usual in the superior courts to have barristers, and attorneys or counsel, as assistants,[2] though, often, courts consist of additional barristers, bailiffs, reporters, and perhaps a jury.

The term "the court" is also used to refer to the presiding officer or officials, usually one or more judges. The judge or panel of judges may also be collectively referred to as "the bench" (in contrast to attorneys and barristers, collectively referred to as "the bar"). In the United States, and other common law jurisdictions, the term "court" (in the case of U.S. federal courts) by law is used to describe the judge himself or herself.[3]

In the United States, the legal authority of a court to take action is based on personal jurisdiction, subject-matter jurisdiction, and venue over the parties to the litigation.

Daozen
17th June 2015, 22:21
The question is, why are we coming at this from the "defendants" angle? i.e. the feisty David challenging the Goliath courts? Why?

They are in the minority. They are in the wrong. Why can't we hold our own trial, even online? This goes to common law courts and citizen juries etc. Another legal area I know little about...

Daozen
17th June 2015, 22:25
Common Law Court Info

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread671458/pg1
http://archive.adl.org/mwd/common.html


At the 6:19 mark of this government instructional video the judge thanks the jurors for helping bring justice "in our common law court"

All of that being said, have people who are using their freemen techniques been right all along?

Freemen went as far as arresting a judge yesterday because the judge refused to state if it was a common law court or if he was operating under his oath.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread670987/pg1

lcam88
18th June 2015, 14:43
Now tell me what a court is.

Why do I have to go to their court? You are tacitly validating them by accepting and approaching their system. Can I open my own court? What do I need for a court? A gavel and a wig? What else?

I am not naive enough to think one judgement could change things overnight, but SOMETHING is going on.

We are all working together and eroding this system from our own special angles.

:)

A court is simply the space before you where you resolve your disputes. In admiralty, that is where the captain happens to be. And indeed are you not the captain of your ship? <shrug/>

I like your approach of not giving it more legitimacy than absolutely required. I don't know if open challenges are really the best way. Certainly working towards a point where you no longer need the benefits offered is something absolutely necessary; we can never be rid of them if we depend on them. That said, perhaps there is a way to assimilate them... It's something I've been thinking over for a very long time. Essentially the oligarchy has come to the point where technological innovation no longer requires sustenance of the blue collar and in turn they have been tacitly exiled economically. Perhaps there is an opportunity or angle to work from with that.

As I see it: I govern myself and don't require anyone else to perform that task for me. But as it happens, many people cannot govern themselves and things are now the way they are.

Don't be too quick to disregard the UCC. It is just like any other system, it will become what people make of it. People have been indoctrinated and trained with money and maybe that is something workable. Just look up the definition of money in the UCC, it doesn't exist. In the Federal Reserve act it explicitly prohibits persons (corporate or otherwise) from requiring payment in a specific _form_ of money. If memory serves, value is defined in the UCC as "money or its equivalent". Equivalent as in a note or draft as further detailed in the UCC.

That victory and the unease by which the turn of events took, is likely only because there was a question, even if not noticed by Heather, that not giving in would be detrimental to the big picture.

lcam88
18th June 2015, 15:13
Thanks for a good breakdown. I was hazy on all those details.

Re: "How far do you want to take it?" There are some issues:

1) Do I even consider the current system valid? i.e. Do I need to submit a form to an illegal legal entity? I'd prefer to write an affadavit voiding any claims they have.

It is valid, we cannot live without it. But you don't need to submit a form. In fact, I did very much what you are suggesting.



2) You can contract with infinity itself, which supersedes ALL other legal entities.

Indeed

The point of contract is only the meeting of like minds in the exchange of consideration.


3) We experienced concrete, legitimate, verified success with contracts pinned to the wall. We are being watched. Higher dimensional courts are real.
But what matters is our resolve, that we govern ourselves, first and foremost. Regardless of whether we are watched or not, and regardless of higher authority of some kind.

And in a way that is that the system is built around too.


4) Interesting that you picked up on the Tacit procuration of surrender. Have you heard the stories of judges being terrified of liens?
I have been meaning to mention it for some time. I have heard of those stories. When my brother engages banks before courts, he normally gets the "special" judge. On more than one occasion they have substituted the judge once they identified him. What does that say? He knows he is urinating (the other word was ****ed out) down the throat of the beast too.


5) I am just going to write something once, and maybe post it online, but nothing more. I refuse to interact with the UCC system, except to void it.

I found the UCC to be the most consistent code in all of the statutes in all the states and countries. Indeed it is almost universal. If you handle paper money, you are handling a note as defined in the UCC in a manner consistent with the UCC. If you sign a check, same thing. Did you know you can write a draft that is the equivalent of money, and exchange it as a bearer instrument, all legally within the bounds of the UCC? What you cannot do with that draft is call it a check or make it resemble a check sufficiently so that it might be confused with a bank document.

The fact is everyone lives by these rules even if they do not know it. Your proposition is tantamount to supposing that being informed about events in your community is be avoided. I personally don't support the Hermit proposition unless you are prepared with an alternative.

Micheal Tellinger of South Africa is trying an interesting experiment there, but even the means he is using, on an informal level, has parallels with the UCC. There are many interesting things you can do even without refuting the UCC. For example, qualify your signature with terms like "without recourse" or "rights reserved". Those terms drastically change the meaning of documents in subtle ways. Why do you think the line you apply your signature to on a check is actually the words "Authorized Representative" in very very small letters?

What you propose, of not interacting with the UCC is quite a bit more formidable than you know.



6) I will add a petition/poll element. These things are noticed too.

So I am almost coming from a magic angle. Magic, in this case, means a system of laws invisible to us that we can still interact with.

So... what would be the best document: Voiding out all their legal claims to Earth? Putting a Lien on the entire harvesting system? Lets get fictional here. They're fictional too.

I agree with you here, that the problem is legal claims and actions people are taking. I really and truly admire your views and will to make a change. My point is to examine how to make that change.

Magic. I liked what Bashar (channelled messages) had to say about imagination, manifestation and the overall that he shared.



The Legal terms I'm looking at are: Void, Tacit Procuration, an Affadavit affirming freedom?, and large scale liens.

Heather did something. She had them all running around. This is documented on line.

Best Wishes,

Very interesting propositions. But is that really the best way? Personally, there is a part of me that prefers leaving Legalities as something for the history books.

lcam88
18th June 2015, 15:16
Forget about all the revisionist arguments about Gandhi. No one was perfect. Look at that quote. Is that just a metaphor, or is a coded reference to a higher court?

All I know is they took this stuff very seriously in Indonesia.

Indonesia is a muslim country, albeit more moderate than some. Just examine that faith a little bit and you should be very weary about religion in general.

lcam88
18th June 2015, 15:27
The question is, why are we coming at this from the "defendants" angle? i.e. the feisty David challenging the Goliath courts? Why?

They are in the minority. They are in the wrong. Why can't we hold our own trial, even online? This goes to common law courts and citizen juries etc. Another legal area I know little about...

(last one!)

Your angle is coming from your view that a claim has been made upon you, Contact Point. You feel you are being challenged and need to defend your position. That is why the difference I made earlier between the person and the human being is relevant. With that understanding and you will notice that there actually is no claim made upon you.

Rather the entire thing is rather a straw-man. They create an entity that they can then easily control, push around and knock down. The con is to have you accept that entity they created as though it where you. I took much care in the language I used in that post. Specifically:


Some years back, a distinction between human-being and person was made to me. The prior being a natural god-created being where the latter is more akin to a record identified by name and number in some governmental arquive, a persona of sorts people wear as though it where a part of them.

I say come to an understanding of who you are (legally) and make the time you have to spend here mean something to you. Don't worry about things that serve only to bring you to bear the wooden yoke until, or unless you can do something meaningful about it.

lcam88
18th June 2015, 16:13
The Legal terms I'm looking at are: Void, Tacit Procuration, an Affadavit affirming freedom?, and large scale liens.

Maybe you only need to look at one term: novation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novation

Even as a person encumbered by beneficiary obligations defined by some secret trust, you can always put forth a novation... Obviously new terms could void preexisting ones...

Perhaps a substitution of trustee :)

The biggest issue is always enforcing, as I say earlier. So the question still comes up, does such a legal maneuver actually matter? What do we actually want to do?

Daozen
18th June 2015, 22:30
Novation! That might tie everything together. I wonder if the UCC is directly linked to the harvesting mechanism. I think Heather said this, I can't remember where...

I have read and absorbed all your points. Lots to think about. I'm going away for a couple of days. The next step is to work on a document which ties all the ideas together. It all comes down to a document.

Daozen
18th June 2015, 22:32
I will interact with the UCC. I guess I am right now whether I like it or not, but do I have to pay 180usd to file something? I don't know, I'm listening.


Indonesia is a muslim country, albeit more moderate than some. Just examine that faith a little bit and you should be very weary about religion in general.

This was in Bali, where they had a deep knowledge of the exopolitical situation, and the ongoing disputes. Have you ever heard this time being called the war of contracts?

Daozen
18th June 2015, 22:47
The biggest issue is always enforcing, as I say earlier. So the question still comes up, does such a legal maneuver actually matter? What do we actually want to do?

So I am sitting in the grey area between legality and magic. As soon as you write something, infinity responds.

We are accustomed to thinking in terms of dismantling in 3D, but I want to expedite the dissolving process. Something is losing it's grip, we can all feel it. Something is fading away.

We want to write a new contract between humans (or at least myself) and the universe, and void all implied contracts. Then file it somewhere, somehow, probably quietly and without fanfare. I have enough background knowledge to know that these contracts are viewed by many civilizations. The occupiers, "They" can walk around acting normal if they want, but they know they are losing their energy.

I won't go round making dramas with judges or making a movement. I will just write the document and maybe put up a poll to ratify it.

*

Next week, if time permits, will write my document in layman's language, and maybe someone can help me make it stronger and tighter.

lcam88
19th June 2015, 03:44
War of contracts. That is an interesting term, the patent wars with apple and samsung going nuclear, has been by and large diffused by the courts.

I have come to understand justice as being a force to maintain the status-quo, not a means of fairness. In that sense, there really is no war.

Do you know how negative averment differs from a normal statement? My affidavits normally make declarations in this later form. To give an example, you can claim:

I am a sovereign human being with free will;

or you can make the same claim in the form that merely establishes the presumption thereof:

There is no evidence that I am not a sovereign human being with free will, and I believe no such evidence exists;

The interesting part of establishing presumptions is that if anyone wishes to challenge the statement, and they may, with the negative averment wording the challenger, hopefully a civil individual, will have the burden of proof required in overcoming the presumption, whereas normally the claimant has this burden. It is called reversing the onus probandi.

You can write an affidavit, or statement of truth, in such terms to establish any presumption you want.

lcam88
19th June 2015, 04:06
I wonder if the UCC is directly linked to the harvesting mechanism.

I think it certainly is used as a foundation by which the contracts and transactions are based. At this point though, there is so much fraud and corruption going on, that perhaps it is used only for the sake of appearances. Courts can't even seem to be able to follow the law they are entrusted to uphold. As you can probably tell, I actually have almost no faith in the powers that be.

Hugh Mann
19th June 2015, 11:05
One can not be a citizen and free at the same time. One can not serve two masters. There's no such thing as a free citizen. A citizen is considered the lowest of lifeforms (Blacks Law Dictionary). I've been studying the law for almost two years and here's my interpretation. There are two forms of law. One is an illusion, the other while suppressed is still recognized and still has teeth.

#1 Man's Laws: Statutory Law, Admiralty/Maritime Law, Corporate law. They're not laws. This is the illusionary law that currently governs most of the globe Codes, statutes and acts are not laws. We get our rights from the Creator/Universe/God/ and the government(s) gets its rights from us (consent of the governed). Jurisdiction and authority is an illusion. It doesn't exists. It's a legal fiction. Those in power know this and they don't want the masses to know this. This form of law is keeping us as slaves. This form of law is purposely made to be complicated and confuse. This form of law is nu-natural, fraudulent and unenforceable unless consent is given. I'll get back to this.

#2 Universal Law/ Common Law/ Gods Law/ Natural Law: All the same. Under this law, everyone is equal. There's no hiding behind statutes of immunity from prosecution. Another words, if you are assaulted by a police officer he/she will not be immune from being prosecuted. Under this form of law, a crime must have been committed to be enforced. There must be a victim. A crime is causing harm or loss to another with intent. Under this law, driving without a license, possession of natural healing plants is legal and thus can not be prosecuted. While this form of law has been suppressed, it is still used and still has teeth.

Now for the infuriating part.
Our justice system and government has been *******ized beyond recognition. It is a for-profit corporation that has a vested interest in your conviction. It uses violence, fear and intimidation to extort money from the uneducated masses under the guise of protection. Does this sound like the mafia? Well, it might as well be because it surely is a criminal racket.
That man or woman sitting on the bench will swear to you under oath that he/she is a fair and impartial judge. That is a bold-faced lie. He/she supposedly takes a constitutional oath each day and yet has the gall to sit in that chair and enforce non-laws upon the public. The state/corporation pays the police, the prosecutor, the judge, the public defending-attorney and even the jury (if there is one). Does this sound fair or impartial? It is a direct conflict of interest. If you think you're assured of a fair trial because you hired and attorney, think again because he/she belongs to the same union as the judge and it's called the BAR Association. The fake court uses a *******ized/fraudulent form of English called legalese. It changes and twist the meanings of common words in order to confuse. You can easily recognize the fake court by the Red, White & Blue US War Flag hanging in the room with gold trim.
No one can be free or sovereign unless they educate themselves enough to defend themselves from these parasites. I can walk out of any court room in minutes because I know enough about the real law to protect myself. Contrary to what we have been taught or brainwashed to believe, you do not need the governments permission (getting a license) unless you're going to do something illegal. Illegal is anything that goes against nature. Buying and selling with money is considered illegal in because it is unnatural. Memorize the following words as it will help defend you from the Black Robe Mafia. Take time to study our founding documents. Knowledge protects and ignorance endangers.

The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for a law which violates the Constitution to be valid. This is succinctly stated as follows:

"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." ---Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803)

"When rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." ---Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491

"An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." ---Norton vs. Shelby County 118 US 425 p. 442

The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it.

"No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it." ---16 Am Jur 2nd, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256

If you don't want to play the game, then don't play their game. You don't need to file any of their BS paperwork (pleas to dismiss, UCC, etc). Don't give them legitimacy by playing their game. As long as I have not committed a crime, I can walk out of any court room in minutes because I have educated myself enough to protect myself from the parasites that rules over us. If you don't want to be governed it is as easy as saying no. Example: When I am summoned to a fake court, I show up to keep from being locked in a cage. When the bailiff enters the room and orders everyone to "rise", I remain seated. If he/she threatens me in any way, I politely remind them of their oath and threaten to sue them under common law for assault if they lay hands upon my body. They will back off. When the fake judge enters the room and wants to know what is going on, I simply tell him/her they have no jurisdiction or authority over me and to have a nice day. I then walk out. When you "rise", you just gave the fake court legitimacy and you gave them power over you. Please don't take what I am saying as legal advise. Study the law for yourself and make up your own conclusions. I know what works for me.
I'm running out of time. I have to get ready for work. I will edit this later to provide some educational links.

lcam88
19th June 2015, 13:01
One can not be a citizen and free at the same time. One can not serve two masters.

Very true, indeed. Although consider, you may serve more than one master if one of them is an agent for the other. IE if their interests are aligned.


If you don't want to play the game, then don't play their game. You don't need to file any of their BS paperwork (pleas to dismiss, UCC, etc). Don't give them legitimacy by playing their game. As long as I have not committed a crime

I am with you until this part. The term crime as used in modern day is a declension from what the term original meant. These days administrative oversights or errors can be classified as a crime, and indeed so can almost any action that is not compliant with demands made by those who claim to enforce the law at least in the United States.

In the most basic sense, law basically means contract. If you wish to go into the details of how and why, we can, but I suggest we first decide if we need a new thread for it. The synopsis is based on a presumption that the followers of an open and transparent system of law all agree to follow it. I suggest that the term "secret law" is an oxymoron for that reason.

The reason contract is important is simply because of what it means in accordance to your aforementioned Universal Law. It is the meeting of minds concerning an exchange of consideration. The abstract nature of that idea is innate to the definition of the term and make no mistake about it, it defines the very nature of social behavior whether corrupt or pure. And its from that sense that no signed paper is actually required for contract to exist. Read my comment on page 2 regarding memorializations thereof.

In the exchanges of ideas I have on this thread, the nature of law or contract is separate from the system whether corrupt or pure, it is merely a tool by which the system creates order within itself. It is common knowledge, I presume, between all of us that read this thread that systems are not innately good or bad, they are like the pie crust that is filled with the goodness that is innate in the ingredients used to fill the pie. Much like economic systems we know of as capitalism and communism, they are in and of themselves devoid of character but they take up the character we perceive as a result of actions taken by people who participate in the system. Law, contract, courts and law enforcement are no different at all.

In that sense, for us to attempt to tarnish the image or nature of the system with unsubstantiated statements is actually off-topic here. Perhaps the Contact Point can better help you understand what his intentions where when he opened the thread with a model of a Declaration.

I welcome comments related to aspects of the system that should be contemplated for the purpose of choosing a strategy, language, or viewpoint to fix what may be suboptimal or broken. I prefer constructive ideas and questions rather than what can only otherwise be described as polarizing "hate" speech.

I will ask, if you might be willing to oblige, to put up a link to Blacks Law published before 1933. That would be a useful link. (mods please advise if linking should be done in a certain way).

Hugh Mann
19th June 2015, 14:29
I agree. Perhaps this should have been created with another topic. Mods, if it's not too much to ask or too much work, could you please move my above comment to a new topic? If not, no biggie. I'll copy & paste it to a new topic and just refer my thread to the new topic. I need to edit and add to it anyway. Either way will work.

Thank you and blessings to all.

lcam88
19th June 2015, 14:39
Hugh, let's leave your comment where it is; you raise interesting views about the two types of law that is very good to consider here. Just create a new thread with an opening remark building on the new off-topic issue where you see fit.

Chester
19th June 2015, 18:26
Opinion only - in 3D...

One cannot exist in the material realm and not at times compromise.

I hope the new thread gets made.

johnjen325
19th June 2015, 22:58
This stuck out…


snip
It is the meeting of minds concerning an exchange of consideration.
snip

With my added emphasis upon "exchange of consideration."

So just what constitutes "consideration"?
What are the limits or comprises the extent of the factors, that make up "consideration"?


HMMmmmmmmmmm…

JJ

Daozen
20th June 2015, 16:40
War of contracts. That is an interesting term, the patent wars with apple and samsung going nuclear, has been by and large diffused by the courts.

It goes beyond that. I'm talking about the war of contracts over Earth, the legal status of humanity. The reversal or negation of our implied contracts, and all who think they are our owners.


Do you know how negative averment differs from a normal statement? My affidavits normally make declarations in this later form. To give an example, you can claim:

I am a sovereign human being with free will;

or you can make the same claim in the form that merely establishes the presumption thereof:

There is no evidence that I am not a sovereign human being with free will, and I believe no such evidence exists;

The interesting part of establishing presumptions is that if anyone wishes to challenge the statement, and they may, with the negative averment wording the challenger, hopefully a civil individual, will have the burden of proof required in overcoming the presumption, whereas normally the claimant has this burden. It is called reversing the onus probandi.

I had played around with that before, but had no idea of the legal term. Yes, I see how powerful it is, and see how it could be a direct contract with infinity. The burden of proof goes on the opposing party. Very clever.

You can write an affidavit, or statement of truth, in such terms to establish any presumption you want.

*

What are we trying to do? I was thinking: If Frodo, Jupiter Jones, and John Connor spent a year in law school, what papers would they file as their final project? Those characters all represent energetic manoeuvres humanity has to perform. Frodo voids. Jupiter Jones writes a lien. John Connor? A novation, maybe?

Hugh, if you want to make a new thread: copy paste your comment, and delete it here.

Daozen
20th June 2015, 16:46
Another idea. What is a court? Anyone can hold a citizens court. Can we hold an online citizens trial for major players on the dark team? If the don't rebut the judgement, I guess they stand unrebutted.

Enforcing it? That comes later. I am happy to play a small part in dissolving the current ruler's legitimacy right now.

lcam88
20th June 2015, 16:59
johnsen235:

Consideration can by anything at all, monetary value,a good, service, the exchange of one monetary value for another (a 20 note for 2x10 notes) for example is an exchange of consideration. A consideration can be any tangible or intangible including peace of mind, knowledge, advice, favor or even promise.

In fact a 10 dollar note is actually a promise if you understand it's origins from the Federal Reserve Act and the UCC.

A contract is an agreement between two or more parties (the meeting of minds) concerning the exchange of consideration. Disagreement cannot be the foundation of a contract, but failure to manifest an opposition can construe an agreement given the right circumstances. Such a circumstance is called tacit acquiescence. The unspoken can in fact be in agreement simply because it is reasonable to presume that an individual acts responsibly for the ordeals that involve him. There are maxims that support this. Qui tacet consentire videtur. (He who is silent appears to consent. Jenk. Cent. 32.) http://www.lawfulpath.com/ref/bouvier/maxims.shtml

All of that said, take a look on page 2 about what I say about memorializations of contract to understand why, in all actuality, contract also has space in Universal Law.

lcam88
20th June 2015, 17:22
Contact Point:

Froto voids? you mean by taking an action to destroy the object of power?

I am not familiar with Jupiter Jones.

John Conner. hmmm It seems his greatest asset is his ability to reprogram machines. That is indeed a metaphor of novation.

The citizen court should be renamed (citizen from my first post here on your thread...). Universal Open Court is better. It would first be required the formation of a ship (vessel) and to establish the charter (purpose) and then nominate or elect the officers who take responsibility for the ship (vessel) who are establish as neutral if not for their efforts to navigate the sea of Commerce and Electronic forum that are the formation about which the vessel, its officers and its crew must contend for survival as well as the objective of their mission. I have 3 cent stamps (without the rectangular border that indicates the non-existence thereof in Admiralty) that we can sign to invoke universal postal code to our memorializations.

I think it behooves to research and establish the requisites as defined in Admiralty so that a claim to illegitimacy may be made more difficult.

And then, some aggrieved party may make a motion...

I think it a good idea, at least for educative purposes, to try and adhere to a code or rules of the court/evidence that are substantially similar to those found in courts of some worldly jurisdiction, perhaps as a US court, so that the experience can be educational as well.

And then we invite a representative, perhaps a senator or house member, to make the case for the US corporation in the venue. That invitation can include language that communicates our intention to utilize secondary option, a member here whom we nominate to represent the US case; they need only remain silent to express the quiescence to offered representation, our nominee...

Daozen
20th June 2015, 17:39
Contact Point:

Frodo voids? you mean by taking an action to destroy the object of power?

Yes. In Earth terms, some people say the destruction of the One Ring is the act of destroying the collateral accounts. Other people say it's about healing the Saturn matrix.


I am not familiar with Jupiter Jones.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THVFkk-sEus
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLyk00gFPdQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQHKolIqBGs

Jupiter Ascending, Plot:


At the beginning of the story, Earth's residents are unaware that the human species on Earth and countless other planets were established[17] by families of transhuman and alien royalty[18] for the purpose of later "harvesting" the resulting organisms to produce a type of youth serum for the elites on still other planets.[19] After the death of the matriarch of the House of Abrasax, the most powerful of the alien dynasties,[9] her children, Balem (Eddie Redmayne), Kalique (Tuppence Middleton), and Titus (Douglas Booth), quarrel over the inheritance, with Balem inheriting an enormous refinery on Jupiter and Titus declaring his intention to dismantle the youth serum trade, of which Earth is the next intended source. Protagonist Jupiter Jones (Mila Kunis) narrates that her father, Maximilian Jones (James D'Arcy), met her mother, Aleksa (Maria Doyle Kennedy), in Saint Petersburg. After Maximilian is killed in a robbery, Aleksa names their daughter Jupiter, after his dying wish, and they move to Chicago to live with Aleksa's family.

*

I agree with everything you said about citizens. You're right, it's just a habit I feel into.

Your setup for the court is brilliant, from the name to the invitation. I think it could all be done from a blogspot. What do you think? Would it have to be done public for it to be legitimate? We could also use a poll to ratify it at the end...

Daozen
20th June 2015, 18:06
One of the main things I'd want to prove in any document/court is: Person/group X is not fit to be a leader/or have a position on Earth, and therefore any claim they have is illegitimate. Then give them 5 days to contest that claim.

Then maybe go so far as to put a lien on their property.

1) Prove that they are incapable of leadership.
2) Void their ownership.
3) Write a novation.
4) Put a lien on their property.

Daozen
20th June 2015, 18:09
You would be placing the burden on the other party to prove confidence/legitamacy.

I guess confidence/no confidence is parliamentary, but there might be a legal parallel.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_of_no_confidence

lcam88
20th June 2015, 21:56
One of the main things I'd want to prove in any document/court is: Person/group X is not fit to be a leader/or have a position on Earth, and therefore any claim they have is illegitimate. Then give them 5 days to contest that claim.

Then maybe go so far as to put a lien on their property.

1) Prove that they are incapable of leadership.
2) Void their ownership.
3) Write a novation.
4) Put a lien on their property.

Leadership is somewhat a vague and perhaps even subjective term. We both know that actions speak louder than words, perhaps we need "Moses leads the slaves into the desert" moment. How to do that is a very large subject in and of itself.

In our westernized civilization, claim of control and claim over the benefits of worldly material, ownership, boils down to the question of who has legitimacy to what. This is done by title, deeds, licensing and of course contracts. But at the level I am thinking of, we want to delegitimize claims to land and natural resources. If the movement you are suggesting is going to be sustainable, you must attend to the basic needs people have, food, shelter, water... as well. Being sovereign is not easy these days because we all depend on the system... We voluntarily must give up some level of sovereignty so we may enjoy benefits the collective (however corrupt) still provides. Steps 2,3 and 4 are actually all one step: shift legitimacy to administer resources from the defunct to the functional.

This type of action, a revolution in every sense of the word, is executed by the people and requires no signed contract or paperwork to legitimize. The very action is legitimizing. In my view, its the only way to get enforcement of the claims made. I think paperwork and contract can serve to create order in the ranks, but in terms of the opponent faced, it will come down to maneuvering, strategy, positioning and perhaps more. I think the best course of action is to use the avenue of democracy, a value they still apparently adhere. Candidates elected need to start responding to call we may put forth. If they can do that voluntarily, or if we elect our own reps into positions, the result is change.

Novation means change.

Organizing the masses is the initial challenge. That is where change must start; we do not want a symbolic victory, or a pyhrric victory, we want an actual victory.

Our opposition have mass media, control of resources as well as all the guns. But, I still think there is a way, the issue is how to make the changes we need and where we may garner strength to hold meaningful positions that will cause change.

Another poster I replied to called for people to organize, to work together. The ether is full, almost saturated, with a desire for something new.

johnjen325
20th June 2015, 22:02
johnsen235:

Consideration can by anything at all, monetary value,a good, service, the exchange of one monetary value for another (a 20 note for 2x10 notes) for example is an exchange of consideration. A consideration can be any tangible or intangible including peace of mind, knowledge, advice, favor or even promise.

So in essence, our mere presence and contribution of meaning, ideas, energy, etc. could also be a form of consideration, depending upon the terms of the agreement between 2 or more individuals involved.

In fact a 10 dollar note is actually a promise if you understand it's origins from the Federal Reserve Act and the UCC.

A contract is an agreement between two or more parties (the meeting of minds) concerning the exchange of consideration. Disagreement cannot be the foundation of a contract, but failure to manifest an opposition can construe an agreement given the right circumstances. Such a circumstance is called tacit acquiescence. The unspoken can in fact be in agreement simply because it is reasonable to presume that an individual acts responsibly for the ordeals that involve him. There are maxims that support this. Qui tacet consentire videtur. (He who is silent appears to consent. Jenk. Cent. 32.) http://www.lawfulpath.com/ref/bouvier/maxims.shtml

All of that said, take a look on page 2 about what I say about memorializations of contract to understand why, in all actuality, contract also has space in Universal Law.

"but failure to manifest an opposition can construe an agreement"
This single aspect has been used to manipulate and maintain 'control' for far to long.

And the fact that this is not 'common knowledge' (both by intention and manifestation) is a 'loop hole' that has been used to take advantage of any and all who succumb to this deception. And since it's not a level playing field AND this is an aspect of fraudulent contractual activity, such that those who are of the 'more for me' crowd make and use these assumptions and 'get away' with it.

The simple fact that this isn't taught in school, except to those who study law, can't be a simple oversight.

(He who is silent appears to consent. Jenk. Cent. 32.)
I see the operative word here as "appears".
So how does the law deal with an abstract term such as appear?

And lastly, from my research it seems that the basis for our contractual understanding is based upon a subset of Universal Law. Which implies that it (UL) is 'more' fundamental in terms of it's 'authority'.


JJ

lcam88
20th June 2015, 23:48
Appearances matter. How do you deal with it? you pad it with procedure to create additional clarity. Throw administrative procedure into the works with communications of your intent. The key is to be very clear, at all stages of what is so that "didn't understand" or didn't know are not admissible. That is actually the strategy used by the IRS.

Administrative procedures, yes. Send a notice of fault to advise that indeed you haven't yet recieved a reply and encourage a reply. Then notice of default. USC defines 30 day periods, so consider a 30 day window for the reply, then send send the first notice and give another 15.

Do you have a link for info on UL, interested.

johnjen325
21st June 2015, 05:49
To me that is a source of consternation.
Appearance is not only culturally dependant, but assumes that the meaning behind appearances are universal.
Clearly this isn't the case.

This involves a huge set of assumptions, much like what TPTB use in defining us as paupers, or being dead at 7 years old, unless we declare otherwwise, etc.

As for a link to a set of Universal Laws, I've not found a 'reliable' and 'trustworthy' source.
I have run across multiple different sources but they don't always agree, thus it's hard to assign any one of them as true Universal Laws.

The Law of One seems to have them embedded within those writtings but it takes a good deal of effort to extricate them, intact.

I figure disclosure will, or at least might, yield this kind of info.

JJ
ps. here is another 'older' source of one set of laws, and they are buried within the pages of these 3 books.
http://nohoax.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=24&catid=1
I ran across these 3 books back in the late 90's

Daozen
22nd June 2015, 14:38
I agree that eventually you have to give it clarity and keep the administrative procedures similar to their own. That gives it legal weight.

I'm thinking in two phases.

Phase one: Magic Phase: I just get the document printed, put online, maybe stamped by a notary, and filed somewhere quietly, maybe out in Taiwan or HK.

Phase two: Legal phase: As above, but with an online "trial" and a fuller legal interaction.

Just drafting the documents would be a good first step, because there is an exo-political angle to this too. How can you refer to the interplanetary situation without using crazy language? It can be done. You just need to be clever with the wording.

I agree leader is a poorly defined term.

Daozen
22nd June 2015, 14:40
(He who is silent appears to consent. Jenk. Cent. 32.

And we have worked out that this cuts both ways. They have used it on us for centuries, but we can also turn it round on them. It's their Achilles heel. I always wondered what the legal equivalent of the photon torpedo in the Death Star was.

Daozen
22nd June 2015, 14:48
If the movement you are suggesting is going to be sustainable, you must attend to the basic needs people have, food, shelter, water... as well. Being sovereign is not easy these days because we all depend on the system... We voluntarily must give up some level of sovereignty so we may enjoy benefits the collective (however corrupt) still provides. Steps 2,3 and 4 are actually all one step: shift legitimacy to administer resources from the defunct to the functional.

This type of action, a revolution in every sense of the word, is executed by the people and requires no signed contract or paperwork to legitimize. The very action is legitimizing. In my view, its the only way to get enforcement of the claims made. I think paperwork and contract can serve to create order in the ranks, but in terms of the opponent faced, it will come down to maneuvering, strategy, positioning and perhaps more. I think the best course of action is to use the avenue of democracy, a value they still apparently adhere. Candidates elected need to start responding to call we may put forth. If they can do that voluntarily, or if we elect our own reps into positions, the result is change.

I have two projects:

One, the legal aspect of weakening their claims to ownership of humanity, which is relatively small, but vital.
Two, I want to set up a crowdfunding platform based solely on benevolent projects. I will call it Microflow. It's already in development.

These projects feed into each other, but it's important to keep the research more or less separate, to stop getting confused.

The word 'movement' can be dangerous, because it implies leaders, structure, soap boxes and the like. All I want is to provide a crowdfunding platform where people can lead themselves.

For this, I need something simple: I need to sit down and do the paperwork to get tax exempt non-profit status in Hong Kong, Taiwan, the EU, The USA, and maybe Switzerland. Getting non-profit status in just one of those countries would allow people to write off donations against tax, and put them into the Microflow crowdfunding platform. Microflow will have a reductionist focus on food, water and the other basics of civilization.

Sitting down and investigating how to get non-profit status is one of those tedious, unglamorous tasks that could help thousands, if not millions of people.

*

So there are two separate aspects.

1- Delegitimizing the "elite's" claim to Earth.
2- Gaining non-profit status.

I guess I will just slowly work on both those tasks as time permits.

Peace

lcam88
22nd June 2015, 15:03
To me that is a source of consternation.
Appearance is not only culturally dependant, but assumes that the meaning behind appearances are universal.

I agree with this.


Clearly this isn't the case.

This involves a huge set of assumptions, much like what TPTB use in defining us as paupers, or being dead at 7 years old, unless we declare otherwwise, etc.

What is TPTB?

Huge assumptions indeed.

But consider the following scenario:

You and a friend have been fighting for some time about something and you know things can come to blows. As a way to measure whether a recent attempt of your to give up your argument for the sake of returning to friendship, you say. "Hey I give-up. Let's just call it quits, let's good sense reign and I'll buy you a drink at the pub."

If your friend doesn't answer, do you buy him a drink or not? There is a need for continuity and an assumption about the message being accepted or not is required.

The basis to presume acceptance in legalities is simply because it's the better of two options; you presume there is honor in both parties. That a flat refusal without recourse to remend a situation is dishonorable, as is indeed, to completely disregard anothers interests where consideration for your interests have been shown.

That maxim was born where cooperation and consideration for all parties and thus harmony between varying interests was much valued.




As for a link to a set of Universal Laws, I've not found a 'reliable' and 'trustworthy' source.
I have run across multiple different sources but they don't always agree, thus it's hard to assign any one of them as true Universal Laws.

The Law of One seems to have them embedded within those writtings but it takes a good deal of effort to extricate them, intact.

I figure disclosure will, or at least might, yield this kind of info.

JJ
ps. here is another 'older' source of one set of laws, and they are buried within the pages of these 3 books.
http://nohoax.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=24&catid=1
I ran across these 3 books back in the late 90's

Thanks for the link. I'll certainly have a good look.

Daozen
22nd June 2015, 15:18
TPTB use in defining us as paupers, or being dead at 7 years old, unless we declare otherwwise, etc.

Do you have a link for information about this? It looks interesting.


As for a link to a set of Universal Laws, I've not found a 'reliable' and 'trustworthy' source.

Me neither. So why don't we start drafting them? It's our right to contract with infinity as we see fit.

lcam88
22nd June 2015, 15:35
Giving clarity boils down just to "giving notice" If you look notice up in a law dictionary or the UCC you will see what I mean; you just need to meet the requirement given by the definition.

In admiralty, that would be making the captain or his officers aware (agents of the captain or vessel). Because vessel has such a broad definition as are the other terms, it may be as simple as publishing it online for anonymous uses to find. The NSA spying dragnet will certainly pick it up, as will google. The UCC1 financing statement is another way to do serve notice as well.

There is no need to be aggressive, offensive, deceptive or sly with the notice serving. It may just be the best way to presume the positive and present reference to your online notice to an elected official as a thank you letter posted by snail-mail.

Daozen
22nd June 2015, 15:43
I agree, clarity, politeness and legal notices are the way forward. A letter is enough...

lcam88
22nd June 2015, 17:03
It's enough to give notice. If you want to perfect a claim on the grounds of tacit acquiescence, then more is required.

You must send additional notices advising of your intentions and considerations given the "non-response" response.. Notice of Fault is exactly that: a notice advising that no response has been received and you intend to interpret that non-response as acceptance of terms, it encourages response in case an error was made in the initial notice. It is an offer for the other named party to govern themselves in-spite of the appearance that they have abandoned that right.

This is how you strengthen the "appearance" of acceptance as stated by the aforementioned maxim. In the notice, for the sake of fairness and complete consideration that in-fact the receiver had made an error, you permit action to be taken to correct that error. This is the administrative procedure component of perfecting the claim.

After the correction period stipulation given in the Notice of Fault, you send a notice of Default, same scenario, except you notice a failure to reply to the notice of Fault and you conclude by issuing a Certificate or Title of some type establishing your complete right to the claim. These processes involving abandoned cars and such is sometimes handled by the DMV in the US only because licensing and the title of the vehicle is their jurisdiction (title of a car is not technically ownership of the vehicle itself, but of ownership to the interests associated with the vehicle only, that interest being the right to use the vehicle on state road-ways).

In admiralty, this process is much the same (salvage of title), the proceedings is carried out by an officer [of the court] where an invitation is made for any other parties to clarify or otherwise add a counterclaim on the original motion. Imagine finding a cargo from another vessel and undergoing some procedure to verify claim on the finding, in 1800th century England. There may be insurance companies that have claim etc etc. The procedure was to protect vested interests of other members of the court only. And from that standpoint, silence is indeed a submission of no-contest to the salvage procedure.

This is another area where research can better tune the exact procedure. You want to adhere as much as possible to norms in the land where you make these claims.

In context of the abandoned state of the human-being (in context of the Person) there is no authority granted to the state, or any corporation where legal claim of the god-created being may rest. And since you are the officer of your vessel, that duty falls upon you to carry the proceeding to salvage title as established in your initial claim(s) as you see fit. Because of potential conflict of interest ethics that comes into contention trying to be judge and beneficiary of these claims, in the US we use Notaries to communicate our notices. Are you interested in notaries or do you intend to use human-beings as the vehicle for your activities?

Sometimes, even if there is an established state jurisdiction, It is worth pursuing the salvage claim yourself. That is the case normally because state organizations are really only interested in administrating the interests of an asset and not the asset itself. The DMV and abandoned car, for example.

EDIT

Rules of evidence states that the word or evidence given by a notary is considered to be equal to the word or evidence presented by an officer, they in effect can speak fact with every statement they may make. That is why police officers can get away with murder (metaphorically). A notary has jurisdiction in the sea of sovereignty because they are agents for the Secretary of State of their state, who in turn is an agent for the secretary of state of the United States. That position requires that the individual expatriate themselves from the United States so they may serve their function. That is something view people realize.

If you do not have an officer or a notary to speak on your behalf, rules of evidence require two witnesses claiming the same facts to have the same weight as the prior. That gets a bit tricky sometimes because people have different daily routines.

I hope that clarifies the issue a bit.

Daozen
22nd June 2015, 17:34
This is how you strengthen the "appearance" of acceptance as stated by the aforementioned maxim.

When I read sentences like that, it makes me think that there is definitely a 'magic'/intention aspect to law.

So, to get down to it... what is the major legal front entity to the (possibly) off world harvesting mechanism, or just the main financial mechanism on Earth? The BIS? The Fed? An obscure office in London? Any ideas...?

Daozen
22nd June 2015, 17:50
OK, I can try and write it in layman's legalese, and maybe other people can help correct it. Feel free to copy paste it and write it properly.

I guess we are focused on

1) The actual letter.
2) The process of delivering the letter.

*


Dear Titus Abrasax/The BIS/The Fed (We'll decide later)

I believe your claim to own Earth's financial system to be fraudulent. I can find no evidence that you are legally fit to own this planet, or the people that live on it. I find that your claim is based on implied consent, and hereditary ownership.

I hereby state that your claim is void, and I give you (ten days) to prove that you are the rightful owner of Earth. If you do not do this, by the legal process of Tacit Procuration, your silence will prove that you have no claim, and ownership of the Earth will revert to (XXXXXX) acting in the 'stead of the good people of Earth.

As you have provided no office of contact, I am forwarding the letter to the following institutions, and initiating a public process on the following blogspot.

I have also initiated a poll, and a Facebook group, asking the people to voice their consent. If they vote overwhelmingly in your favour, I am prepared to drop the case to void you claim.

I hope that this letter finds you in good health,

Faithfully,

Contact Point





I wrote that in pidgin legalese, I know...

lcam88
22nd June 2015, 18:17
When I read sentences like that, it makes me think that there is definitely a 'magic'/intention aspect to law.

So, to get down to it... what is the major legal front entity to the (possibly) off world harvesting mechanism, or just the main financial mechanism on Earth? The BIS? The Fed? An obscure office in London? Any ideas...?

1. It is a social issue, not a space issue.
2. An earthy issue better be addressed to the body that dominates the world issues scene, UN or US, maybe? Maybe the queen, even thought the US is no longer commonwealth. Hmmm I don't know.


But certainly not an agency that licenses some already-god-given-right. Their mandates are very specific.

How did the human rights court in the Hague get legitimacy? It was likely a treaty with the UN right?

Daozen
22nd June 2015, 18:24
OK, well it would have to be delivered to 10 different agencies. I am just using Titus as a "metonym' for all of the above. It might not be a space issue (no one knows) but it is a planetary issue. So here's the revised letter:


The BIS/The Fed (We'll decide later)

I believe your claim to own Earth's financial system to be fraudulent. I can find no evidence that you are legally fit to own this planet, or the people that live on it. I find that your claim to authority and ownership is based on implied consent, tacit acquiescence, and hereditary ownership.

I hereby state that your claim is void, and I give you (ten days) to prove that you are the rightful owner of Earth. If you do not do this, by the legal process of Tacit Procuration, your silence will prove that you have no claim, and ownership of the Earth will revert to (XXXXXX) acting in the 'stead of the good people of Earth.

As you have provided no office of contact, I am forwarding the letter to the following institutions, and initiating a public process on the following blogspot.

I have also initiated a poll, and a Facebook group, asking the people to voice their consent. If they vote overwhelmingly in your favour, I am prepared to drop the case to void your claim.

I hope that this letter finds you in good health,

Faithfully,

Contact Point

Daozen
22nd June 2015, 18:29
On a philosophical level, Titus represents the corrupt, entitled planetary elite.

I would be more inclined to go after the banking system than the governing systems. So the BIS, Fed and others are high on my list.

lcam88
22nd June 2015, 18:35
How about an embassy? After all is the British embassy not responsible for all foreign relations on behalf of Great Britain? And once you declare your human self a sovereign are you not also entitled to be recognized as foreign to Britain?

I live in ___ _____ _____ and often times I see a Land Rover driving up the street with a sticker of the british flag to the one side of the rear license plate. I've often wondered by a vehicle might "fly the british flag" here on the streets. I think my answer above has something do with it.

I don't suggest joking about any action in this regard; don't get confused with a state target! Else I be very worried about your well being. Also, there is no need to be public about it, right? Do you require recognition from someone who doesn't know?

Daozen
22nd June 2015, 18:46
I think figuring out who to send it to comes later. I'm more concerned about tidying up my laymans legalese.


don't get confused with a state target! Else I be very worried about your well being.

I have been on their radar in the behind the scenes game for 6 years or more. I don't mind what mood this letter is written in, but an air of politeness is better than being angry and confrontational. That is much more dangerous.

I will probably do it non-publicly, but I'm not sure. Again, this can be decided after the letter is worded.

I like the idea of parallel campaigns. A more serious one under the radar, and a more public one focusing (maybe) on Titus Abrasax as a symbol for the planetary elite. If you thought that was frivolous, I completely understand your point of view. So I would have the two campaigns separate. One could shadow the other. As you are not a public co-signer, you don't need to worry too much about how it looks in public. This is a multi-pronged approach. Anyway... that is a small point. The main thing is to get it drafted.

It can be more dangerous to do things like this in secret.

*

1) Write the letter.
2) Decide on the targets.
3) Decide on the public tone.
4) Decide who will sign.
5) Decide on the process (notice of default etc.)

Daozen
22nd June 2015, 18:52
I would also like to make a template that other people could use if they wanted.

lcam88
22nd June 2015, 19:02
The name "Titus Abrasax" didn't ring a bell, but that doesn't mean that group is not a good representative of the forces that be. I do know that the Elite obviously prefer discretion to publicity. If you want to move them in a meaningful way at all that is at least something to consider.

At the risk of referring to something I know absolutely nothing about, consider:

If your move is the placement of humanity in all things beyond earth, then perhaps the best thing is to move for a recognition to empower mankind, not for the purpose of tilting the status-quo against the elite, but so that humanity can further support them as we move into a realm of uncertainty. That strategy, almost biblical (to embrace your enemy) might be an interesting approach, and it certainly demonstrates pragmatism. This would require an inclination that their corruption is incidental rather than intentional.

On the other hand, if your realm is that if the Magic Nation (imagination has power indeed), maybe they are just too irrelevant to bother wasting ink and paper. Maybe your efforts are better spent not appealing to an existing authority of some kind, but establishing your own.

Of the two, I cannot say really, which is the better position as I am actually too uninformed of "Titus Abrasax".

Daozen
22nd June 2015, 19:32
Titus is a fictional character in Jupiter Ascending. It may work for the public campaign. Most royal claims are more or less fiction.

I realized I don't need to "target" anyone, as that is too confrontational. I am merely affirming a truth/affidavit in front of a notary, and asking "them" to rebut it if they have any evidence to do so. If it stands unrebutted, the judgement passes. I think I can send it to 5 institutions, and follow standard courtesy notice/notice of default procedures.


If your move is the placement of humanity in all things beyond earth, then perhaps the best thing is to move for a recognition to empower mankind, not for the purpose of tilting the status-quo against the elite, but so that humanity can further support them as we move into a realm of uncertainty. That strategy, almost biblical (to embrace your enemy) might be an interesting approach, and it certainly demonstrates pragmatism. This would require an inclination that their corruption is incidental rather than intentional.

Things have gone too far for that, but I am happy to help them stand down peacefully.


On the other hand, if your realm is that if the Magic Nation (imagination has power indeed), maybe they are just too irrelevant to bother wasting ink and paper. Maybe your efforts are better spent not appealing to an existing authority of some kind, but establishing your own.

This is better. I am also thinking in terms of putting a lien on the Earth, or several large institutions. Heather was very clever, but my docs will be written in a more straight-forward manner.

"If they can't contest the lien, it stands" That is what they said to us... now let us do that to them...

*

I also want a phased approach:

1) Draft it here.
2) Start a thread inviting them to contact me if they can rebut the affirmation.
3) Email five institutions.
4) Start a poll ratifying the whole procedure. (1-4) are free
5) Get it notarized/stamped.
6) Send a few official letters.
7) Start a public campaign, probably focused on Titus as the symbol for the elite. (7 is optional, but the press would love it. It would in no way detract from the legitimacy of the docs, and would make the whole thing less confrontational. If that made you uncomfortable, just ignore it)

*

The key is getting the wording on the original doc better.

johnjen325
22nd June 2015, 19:54
Do you have a link for information about this? It looks interesting.

I'll have to dig this info back up.
I think it was linked to the papul bulls…

Me neither. So why don't we start drafting them? It's our right to contract with infinity as we see fit.

I agree, and indeed I see this thread as a way of moving forward with this idea. :thumb: :eyebrows:

JJ

Daozen
22nd June 2015, 19:55
Another option is to write a Novation resetting their claim, and establishing that their authority has to be opt in, instead of opt out. I will write a form for people to sign, stating that they put themselves under the authority of these institutions. Consent has to written, explicit, countersigned. NOT implied, verbal, tacitly acquired. Then we have a completely fair system.

This puts everyone on equal ground. I am starting from the realm of the mind/Magic Nation, but I do want this to be a 100 per cent legitimate legal process. I want to interact with these institutions, but on my terms. I will file documents. Where, I don't know yet. I have not decided if I recognize any of their institutions. The more I think about the whole thing, the more it seems to be a smoke and mirrors anyway.

Daozen
22nd June 2015, 19:58
Papal bulls! I missed that. Can we list the major ones here?

lcam88
22nd June 2015, 20:00
You will have to introduce me to Heather. I'm curious to know who this vivacious and wonderful person is :)


Things have gone too far for that, but I am happy to help them stand down peacefully.

That is a jewel!

For the sake of the bank, do one at a time. Notaries and mailings get expensive, fast!. 3 mailings, all requiring this crap for each perfected claim adds up.

Also, while it would be dishonorable for me to suggest a swindle, consider that hypothetically you can always nominate someone to represent the interests of your mailing.

I suggest someone who accepts the task of wearing the citizen ( at least for these proceedings and in the very sense of the word I gave on page 2) who an acclaim to be an agent or representative of their master before the "divine". Someone who is well spoken enough that the linguistics do not become a point of contention and who may pursue more normal avenues of reasoning to better mimic the artificial entity that is the state. You can then cut down on the cost and requirements of such perfect documentation in that highest of standard mailings and notarizations by having the state respond honorably in kind rather than by non-response and dishonorably.

EDIT: This strategy is very very similar to what state courts do with the attorney game. You can hire an attorney for your court representations but that attorney has an obligation to uphold the interests of court and the "public policy" before he considers the interests of the client, you. Public policy being an adverb-verb fiction that has a specific (however vague) definition ratified and accepted by the "club".

Is that a strategy you consider worth pursuing?

Daozen
22nd June 2015, 20:04
I will just start by doing it electronically. Most of these guys have Twitter + an email address, right? Why waste money on stamps? Mailings are phase 6. Phase 1-4 are all electronic.

I may just represent myself. Not sure yet.

It all comes down to the wording now.


This would require an inclination that their corruption is incidental rather than intentional.

You right that this is a generational problem. I bear them no ill will, and they are trapped by their own system. Everyone wants out.

Daozen
22nd June 2015, 20:06
This is Heather:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=paz5lEoxXrc

Daozen
22nd June 2015, 20:11
Unam sanctam
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (November 2010)

On 18 November 1302, Pope Boniface VIII issued the Papal bull Unam sanctam[1] which some historians[2] consider one of the most extreme statements of Papal spiritual supremacy ever made. The original document is lost but a version of the text can be found in the registers of Boniface VIII in the Vatican Archives.[3] The Bull lays down dogmatic propositions on the unity of the Catholic Church, the necessity of belonging to it for eternal salvation, the position of the pope as supreme head of the Church, and the duty thence arising of submission to the pope in order to belong to the Church and thus to attain salvation. The pope further emphasizes the higher position of the spiritual in comparison with the secular order.

The main propositions of the Bull are the following: First, the unity of the Church and its necessity for salvation are declared and established by various passages from the Bible and by reference to the one Ark of the Flood, and to the seamless garment of Christ. The pope then affirms that, as the unity of the body of the Church so is the unity of its head established in Saint Peter and his successors. Consequently, all who wish to belong to the fold of Christ are placed under the dominion of Peter and his successors.

Most significantly, the bull proclaimed, "outside of her (the Church) there is neither salvation nor the remission of sins".[4] It is an extreme form of the concept known as "plenitudo potestatis" or the plenitude of power; it declares that those who resist the Roman Pontiff are resisting God's ordination.[5]

The bull also declared that the Church must be united, the Pope was the sole and absolute head of the Church:

“ Therefore, of the one and only Church there is one body and one head, not two heads like a monster.[6] ”

Daozen
22nd June 2015, 20:15
http://one-evil.org/content/symbols_triple_crown.html

The 2nd Crown of the Commonwealth

The second Crown was created in 1481 with the papal bull Aeterni Regis meaning "Eternal Crown" by Sixtus IV being only the 2nd of three papal bulls as deeds of testamentary trusts.

This Papal Bull created what is known as the "Crown of Aragon", later known as the Crown of Spain, being the highest sovereign and highest steward of all Roman Slaves subject to the rule of the Roman Pontiff. Spain lost the crown in 1604 when it was granted to King James I of England by Pope Paul V after the successful passage of the "Union of Crowns" or Commonwealth in 1605 after the false flag operation of the Gunpowder Plot.

The Crown was finally lost by England in 1975 when it was returned to Spain and King Carlos I, where it remains to this day.

This 2nd Crown is represented by the 2nd cestui Que Vie Trust created when a child is born being the sale of the birth certificate as a Bond to the private central bank of the nation, depriving them of ownership of their flesh and condemning them to perpetual servitude as a Roman person, or slave.

The 3rd Crown of the Ecclesiastical See

The third Crown was created in 1537 by Paul III through the papal bull Convocation also meant to open the Council of Trent being the third an final testamentary deed and will of a testamentary trust, being the trust set up for the claiming of all "lost souls", lost to the See.

The Venetians assisted in the creation of the 1st cestui Que Vie Act of 1540 to use this papal bull as the basis of Ecclesiastical authority of Henry VIII. This Crown was secretly granted to England in the collection and "reaping" of lost souls.

The Crown was lost in 1815 due to the deliberate bankruptcy of England and granted to the Temple Bar, which became known as the Crown Bar, or simply the Crown.

The Bar Associations have been responsible ever since in administering the "reaping" of the souls of the lost and damned, including the registration and collection of Baptismal certificates representing the souls collected by the Vatican and stored in its vaults.

This 3rd Crown is represented by the 3rd cestui Que Vie Trust created when a child is baptized being the grant of the Baptismal certificate by the parents to the church or Registrar being the gift of title of the soul. Thus, without legal title over one's own soul, a man or woman may be "legally" denied right to stand as a person, but may be treated as a creature and thing without legally possessing a soul. Hence, why the Bar Association is able to legally enforce Maritime law against men and women- because they can be treated as things, cargo that does not possess a soul.

Daozen
22nd June 2015, 20:18
What I don't want to do is go on a huge paperchase where I run around chasing people outside courts in obscure youtube videos. A few well chosen emails should suffice.

I have to sleep soon, but thanks for your input everyone...

johnjen325
22nd June 2015, 20:24
I agree with this.

What is TPTB?
The Powers That Be

Huge assumptions indeed.

But consider the following scenario:

You and a friend have been fighting for some time about something and you know things can come to blows. As a way to measure whether a recent attempt of your to give up your argument for the sake of returning to friendship, you say. "Hey I give-up. Let's just call it quits, let's good sense reign and I'll buy you a drink at the pub."

If your friend doesn't answer, do you buy him a drink or not? There is a need for continuity and an assumption about the message being accepted or not is required.

The basis to presume acceptance in legalities is simply because it's the better of two options; you presume there is honor in both parties. That a flat refusal without recourse to remend a situation is dishonorable, as is indeed, to completely disregard anothers interests where consideration for your interests have been shown.

That maxim was born where cooperation and consideration for all parties and thus harmony between varying interests was much valued.


Thanks for the link. I'll certainly have a good look.

"you presume there is honor in both parties"
There is also the presumption that the words used, mean the same to all parties, ie. all parties know what all the other parties know with respect to the terms and conditions of the contract, in the first place.
Which also presumes that all parties involved understand the terms and conditions inherently embedded within all the specific words (ie. legaleze sounds like standard english, but isn't…)

These presumptions all to easily lead to fraudulent contracts, which by the definitions used where legaleze applies, means the contract(s) are null and void and non-binding at their very inception.

The difficulty is 'enforcing' this auto-nullification, since the only means to do so currently is thru the very same legaleze based 'justice system', which is loath to address this very point, which is by definition dishonorable (in standard english but not in legaleze).

JJ

Daozen
22nd June 2015, 20:34
http://wakeup-world.com/2013/11/05/the-crown-empire-and-the-city-of-london-corporation/


The City of London also has its own Lord Mayor, different from the current Mayor, who has the power in The Crown Corporation. When the Queen wishes to conduct business in the City, she is met by the Lord Mayor at Temple Bar. Temple Bar and their associate franchises come from what is called the Four Inns of the Temples of Court – the Inner Temple and the Middle Temple. The logo of the Inner Temple is a white horse on the sunburst seal of the Jesuit Order. The white horse is a symbol of the British Empire / Order of the Garter / Crown Corporation, and is the same white horse which is the symbol of the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations). The white horse is a Jesuit symbol – Pegasus. It is the Jesuit Order that governs the Honourable Society of the Inner Temple. The Inner Temple is the core group that governs the City of London Corporation.

The whole Earth is governed by The Crown, through Crown Colonies which belong to The City – The Crown Empire. It governs Africa and still governs China and India. The colonies of the Earth are really just Crown Colonies – The United States of America are states of The Crown.

This being said, however, it is vitally important to remember the following. The Crown Empire uses commercial law (aka international maritime law, or law of contracts) as its means of control. This law does not apply to sovereign, free men and women.

Your name, when spelt out in all capital letters – as in JULIAN WEBSDALE – is a corporation, a trust set up by the government through the treasury department at your birth. Every time a child is born, a corporation/trust is created using his or her name in all capital letters. They do this because governments are corporations and they operate under commercial law, the law of contracts. The laws passed by governments only apply to corporations and not to living, breathing, flesh and blood sovereign-free men and women spelt in upper-lower or all lower case, as with Julian Websdale, or julian websdale. The living, breathing sovereign man and woman is subject to common law, not the commercial law introduced by governments through legislation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Mayor_of_London

johnjen325
22nd June 2015, 20:34
OK, well it would have to be delivered to 10 different agencies. I am just using Titus as a "metonym' for all of the above. It might not be a space issue (no one knows) but it is a planetary issue. So here's the revised letter:

I'd suggest filing it with the UCC, which makes it globally applicable and goes straight to the center of the commerce system.
It also makes it binding upon ALL commerce, if it goes un-refuted.

The 'trick' is enlisting the help of one who knows how to correctly file a UCC 'claim/filing' etc.

JJ

Daozen
22nd June 2015, 20:36
I'd suggest filing it with the UCC, which makes it globally applicable and goes straight to the center of the commerce system.
It also makes it binding upon ALL commerce, if it goes un-refuted.

JJ

Alright. Will think about that. Can I do that from Taiwan? 180USD is too much right now, but I'll think about it.

johnjen325
22nd June 2015, 20:37
Papal bulls! I missed that. Can we list the major ones here?
The document I have that lists the papul bulls is rather lengthy.

here is a link to a document I have found.

http://files.meetup.com/562554/THE%20HISTORY%20OF%20TODAY%27S%20SLAVERY%20v2.pdf

JJ

johnjen325
22nd June 2015, 20:44
Alright. Will think about that. Can I do that from Taiwan? 180USD is too much right now, but I'll think about it.

From what little I know there are UCC 'offices' all around the world.
Heather filed all of her 'claims' in this way.

lcam88
22nd June 2015, 20:46
"you presume there is honor in both parties"
There is also the presumption that the words used, mean the same to all parties, ie. all parties know what all the other parties know with respect to the terms and conditions of the contract, in the first place.
Which also presumes that all parties involved understand the terms and conditions inherently embedded within all the specific words (ie. legaleze sounds like standard english, but isn't…)

These presumptions all to easily lead to fraudulent contracts, which by the definitions used where legaleze applies, means the contract(s) are null and void and non-binding at their very inception.

The difficulty is 'enforcing' this auto-nullification, since the only means to do so currently is thru the very same legaleze based 'justice system', which is loath to address this very point, which is by definition dishonorable (in standard english but not in legaleze).

JJ

Thanks for the clarifications here unquoted.

Indeed presumptions are a very interesting topic. Incidentally, it is also presumed that you don't contract with dishonor. That is why confessions made under duress are invalid (nil ab initium, if memory serves.). They don't meet the very definition of contract which requires the meeting of minds. Insofar as the presumptions are shared, even silently, contracts are valid as they represent the good faith the parties have with an exchange.

In other words, starting with the presumption where the parties act in good faith is a requirement for a contract to even exist, and that perhaps is why such a presumption as you quote above must be in place.

Let's suppose the normal case is, a representative (a senator for example) signs a contract that binds the people he represents, as long as there is no manifestation of opposition to the new agreement, it is presumed to be accepted (that silence acceptance understanding). There may even be a waiting period or comments period before things go into effect. The FCC stuff with net neutrality for example. Either way, the only reasonable thing for an individual who governs his affairs is to novate the contract so that it sits more favorably to his acceptance. But without this manifestation it stands that there is/was no objection.

Government tries to stifle this right by creating rules for petitions and norms for procedures they would like to see that diminishes the voice of individuals, perhaps rightly so. But also perhaps not.

I used to go so far as to say the system is perfect simply because of the level of power such a presumption implies we all have. I have since reserved that opinion to a more idealistic and utopian plain.

That is why secret law is actually totalitarianism; you are denied the right to even know what you are presumed to know.

lcam88
22nd June 2015, 20:48
I'd suggest filing it with the UCC, which makes it globally applicable and goes straight to the center of the commerce system.
It also makes it binding upon ALL commerce, if it goes un-refuted.

The 'trick' is enlisting the help of one who knows how to correctly file a UCC 'claim/filing' etc.

JJ
The online UCC form options have limited the complete list permissible in a way that neuters it from the standpoint of what we want to do. Be careful because filing incorrectly can land you frivolous charges.

Daozen
22nd June 2015, 20:53
This lady has tied together a lot of what we were talking about. A skim of the video shows the judge abandoned the office. Maybe the legends are true.

Starts about 2:45

https://youtu.be/uAYQTCluFhk?list=PL9F379VIZ5AqGd13OatxL958Bszk0FrT N&t=165

Daozen
22nd June 2015, 20:55
Be careful because filing incorrectly can land you frivolous charges.

That's what happened to some of the OPPT. I won't play around with this...

Daozen
22nd June 2015, 21:18
It's hard for us to enforce a claim. It looks like it's not easy for them to fully enforce their system either. Looks like there's a balance of forces. I guess it's up to everyone to make their choice. The micro leads the macro.

*

http://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/notice-of-dishonor.asp

johnjen325
22nd June 2015, 22:00
snip

Do you have a link for info on UL, interested.

Here is a rather lengthy write up I wrote in 2010 based upon the Handbook for the new Paradigm books

THE UNDERLYING LAWS OF CREATION

A.K.A.

THE FOUR BASIC LAWS OF THE UNIVERSE…

Sounds all officious and everything doesn’t it? And really they aren’t ‘Laws’ at all but guidelines or descriptions of some of the substructure that underlies the very fabric of our existence. But calling them ‘Laws’ does lend them more importance, and importance is important. ;-)

They seem way too simple at first and what’s this, there are only 4 of them? But as you delve into their inner meaning and then the nature of the interaction between them, it becomes - much - more involved. For a more complete understanding than is possible in this short missive I recommend you read them for yourself.

http://www.trufax.org/handbooks/paradigmvol1.html
This address also uses info from books 2 and 3

But that doesn’t mean I’m letting any of you off the hook, by not providing a once over lightly and just to spice things up even more I’ll throw in some parallel concepts as well. I mean after all we ARE talking about the LAWS OF CREATION here.

To begin with here is an excerpt that gets us started.

"The universal laws, though appearing simple in concept, contain many nuances that appear as paradoxes. A paradox is "a statement that seems contradictory, etc. but may be true in fact; a statement that is self-contradictory, and, hence, false" as quoted from Webster’s New World dictionary. For example, the law of allowance is not a law unless upheld by the laws of attraction and intentional creation. In this case then, the law of allowance is a paradox. It is and is not a law. Inasmuch as the underlying basis of creation is conceptional thought, the laws are concepts to be interpreted or applied within the parameters of each and the combination of all. In the simplest terms possible, this means that as each is understood, it must also be understood that all act in cooperation bringing forth the result of harmony and balance. The 4th law depends on the interaction of the previous three as a prerequisite.

…Attempting to comprehend the underlying laws of creation within their continuous interacting flow as they delineate creation is something like wondering which came first, the chicken or the egg. The creation simply is! It is to be comprehended and joined cooperatively at the point of realization to the best of each one’s ability to do so. What ever that is, is "good enough!"

Now for some these ‘Laws’ could be considered ‘strange’ in that they don’t admonish us with how to behave or how matter operates or is ‘constructed’ etc. but rather they provide us an insight on how consciousness is encircuited within creation and ‘initiates’ and directs those inherent energies. In short it gives us a glimpse into how we can ‘work the system’. And of course there are a few additional ‘tools’ that enable us to be more effective in our efforts, the first and most significant of which is discernment. This next paragraph is an excellent examination and functional description of just what discernment is all about.

The practice of discernment is part of the application of the Law of Allowance (the 3rd ‘Law’). To consider the appropriateness of an undertaking in either the before, during or after mode requires a letting go of the emotions involved in the experience so that the logic of it can be considered. This may be an on going process of consideration before the totality of the lesson is gained. Even partial understanding and realization of its purpose in the totality of the life experience allows for greater knowledge to become wisdom which in turn allows the individual to apply this and change their pattern of expression to include different possibilities. In order to consider the situation and its circumstances there is a letting go that is necessary in order to allow the mind to consider the possibilities of the who, what, why and how of the total picture. If there is considerable open mindedness, possible scenarios can be played out in order to determine the greatest number of possibilities. Through this process, the more logical meanings become clear. Through this release needed solutions often become accessible because the mind has been allowed to reach inward to access the available wisdom from within. Each has a storehouse of available wisdom that is obtainable through the practice of discernment. There must be a desire to lift personal experience out of the daily morass of pointless repetition, judgment and blame.

And to be clear here we are dealing with non material subjects here, so trying to apply them to our physicality is going to provide less than useful results. Which means we are dealing in the realm of spirit and thought energies.

The first ‘Law’ that being - The Law of Attraction - seems simple enough, until you begin to fully grasp and appreciate the magnitude of it’s effect.

The underlying Law of Creation is the Law of Attraction. Simply stated, like attracts like. It does this through the basic tool of Creation—thought. I believe your bible states "As a man thinketh, so is he."

However, the law of attraction absolutely works, but within the flow of divine order, the timing is left to the natural flow of that law within the intelligence of creation.

The focused thought process when fueled by emotion moves quickly through creational energy. As it leaves the dense field of energy, it becomes finer or vibrates more rapidly. It is the return trip, so to speak, in the manifestation process that slows in its oscillation rate. The law of attraction magnetizes the object of the focused thought that was "sent out into the creational field of energy" and it is returned to the point of origin. When the point of origin is vibrating at the slower rate, it appears within the sequential time orientation to manifest very slowly. If during this sequential experience, the focus is withdrawn or sufficiently weakened, the magnetic attraction process is aborted."

These passages contain several interesting ‘gems’. The first is that thought is the basic tool of creation. And right on it’s heels is that the timing or rather how and when we see the results is dependent upon the very process of not only what is being attracted but how it will manifest and these are in turn dependent upon that which is desired. And notice “The focused thought process when fueled by emotion” aspect. This should provide a clue to those who are paying attention. And the next little point of relevance is “If during this sequential experience, the focus is withdrawn or sufficiently weakened, the magnetic attraction process is aborted.” Remember the topic of distraction? (post # 964+ & 1005-6)

This ‘law’ also involves another topic we have lightly explored, that being the victim/abuser modality of behavior…

"Understanding why "god allows this branch of humanity to suffer" is impossible to understand without encompassing the workings of the law of attraction. Victim/oppressor consciousness is two sides of the same coin. Existing at the lower scale of the vibratory range of manifested life experience; the magnetic attraction of the two is extremely strong. As the evolving consciousness strives to experience knowledge into wisdom it returns again and again to achieve freedom from this particular trap.

It is to be remembered that the law of attraction causes the victim to draw to its experience those who have a like consciousness but are on the other side of it, like the two sides of a coin. Those who feel abused draw to them those who will provide more of that experience until that attitude is shed."

And here is a real zinger. After reading this next paragraph perhaps certain aspects of group behavior will be understood in a clearer light, as well as provide some insight into the motivation behind why our reality is the way it currently is.

"…mankind on planet earth has been influenced from the beginning to maintain the understanding that knowledge and wisdom comes from those of greater and superior knowledge and wisdom. Further that this knowledge and wisdom is given out to them through adoration and worship of those holding this superior understanding. This has brought an understanding that the humans on this planet exist at the whim of those holding this superior wisdom. As time has passed, this understanding has been manipulated into the belief by humanity that it is vested in an unknowable awareness that has all the attributes as wielded over them by their overlords. These ever present beings have hidden themselves and operated through this “unknowable God,” holding humanity hostage not only for the resources of the planet, but as a last experiment in manipulation and literal entertainment. It has been previously been referred to as their own “virtual reality computer game.” Unfortunately that is more truth than fiction."

And there are numerous additional nuances involving many other thought provoking concepts and aspects of our reality, all centered on this 1st ‘Law’, in these 3 books.

"And next is the Law of Deliberate Intent. It also seems all too simple. But as we progress in our understanding of these ‘Laws’ it too will yield greater depth and complexity.

The Law of Deliberate Intent. Purposefully withdrawing your fear and fascination for the evil situation once you are aware of it, with the deliberate intent of doing so, is using this Law. You cannot do this by attempting to stop thinking about it. It is only possible to do this by substituting another thought on a completely different subject.

When you choose to place your intent beyond the play perceived by the 5 senses, and place it instead into the creation of a new experience, you are withdrawing your consent and support of the experience in which you no longer wish to participate. You are using the second Law of the Universe.

This ‘Law’ helps to formulate a much more directed intent, one that is focused upon a purposeful rather than reactive net result. It helps during the initial stages of the desire to manifest into reality that which is the subject, or topic at hand, using the Law of Attraction. You can also see where the interplay of these Laws is already manifesting.

A coincident concept of complicity also comes into play here. It is in close association with the Victim/Abuser that is so common, once it becomes apparent.

Complicity involves believing the intent of those involved is for the good of all. Perhaps now you can see the power of sympathy for the afflicted ones around your globe. This supports the victim consciousness that is required, for it is complicity in disguise. Do you not consider them victims of war or natural disaster or poverty? You must take a deep breath, accept your part in bringing support to their feelings of victimhood. They too have responsibility in the creation of those situations. Your sympathy will not solve their misery. Your deliberate choice to create a new paradigm of experience will do that. Withdrawing your focus of attention and bringing it toward creating a new experience will bring the change about far more quickly than repeatedly sending aid while considering them poor innocent victims.

These first 2 ‘Laws’, that seem all to simplistic, so much so that they couldn’t possible be considered ‘Laws’ have much more to them as they interact and especially as we learn HOW to optimally interact and apply them. For most they probably seem like a waste of time and so they hardly warrant any further study. But…

It is important that you come to realize that the Laws of the Universe are immutable. They cannot be changed or distorted. They work without question as to whom is applying them. When you consider the plan of evil intent that surrounds you, you can see them at work. Like attracts like and intent of purpose brings situations into being. However, we have attempted to bring to your understanding that there are nuances within these Laws that allow for Creation to continue. There needs to be an understanding and awareness of the leavening ingredient of Freewill followed by its proper use. Through this we have infinite variety within Creation and expansive movement results."


And now for the exciting, intriguing, mystifying, concluding segment of this little diatribe of COSMIC significance…


"The 3rd Law of the Universe is the most difficult to access and to practice. It is the Law of Allowance.

This ‘Law’ is probably the most demonstrable and obvious example of all 4 ‘Laws’ and there are examples of it, or more precisely the lack of it, for all to observe right here on this site. And since humans mentally operate essentially like difference engines, we all have a hard time with this one. And once we notice all those differences and immediately categorize and label them, well that’s when the fun begins. That’s entertainment for some and a socializations tool for others…

Allowance is the most difficult of the laws to be learned at the 3rd dimensional level because of the deeply ingrained need to control. Control is transcended through the practice of the Law of Allowance.

The release of the need to control through allowance changes the perception profoundly. It allows transcendence from responsibility for others and recognizes the personal choice of releasing them to their own personal decisions. Rather than bringing forth feelings of separation, this blessing process brings forth an experience of a form of love that has blessed them in a way that will have profound effects on their life. In adversarial situations, a change may take several repetitions, but it will bring change.

This ‘Law’ presents the biggest challenge to implement in our day to day lives. It essentially tells us to let those with differing views have them and NOT TO TRY to change them. Now if there is a request made to explain or come to terms with an idea etc then allowance has been granted. It is a lead by example rather than by command situation, that once grasped reduces the drama quotient in one’s life by multiple orders of magnitude.

The law of allowance is more difficult to perceive because of the degree of control exercised individually and by outside psychological (including religious) and technological mind manipulations. It is indeed, difficult for most of mankind to actually have and/or maintain a sovereign attitude. The opportunity to live life with freedom of choice and be allowed to observe and learn from the results of those choices is rare. To declare the desire to do so is incorporated within the desire for a new paradigm of experience.

And as this ‘Law’ is incorporated into one’s being and it interacts with the previous 2 ‘Laws’ there is a synergistic change in one’s being and behavior. It can become so noticeable that others will start to interact with us in new ways and this shift will tend to ‘feed’ upon itself and accelerate. Some may find it difficult to continue to behave with us using the same old behavioral patterns, and so either further interaction may cease altogether or a change must take place.

The complexity of the universal laws increase, as they are understood. Moving through the understanding of the laws of attraction and focused intentional manifestation to the law of allowance adds complexity at each level for all are interactive. Application of the law of allowance opens the door to experience the flow of creative energy. It might be said that it is "love in action."

The law of allowance is the most difficult of the three active or dynamic universal laws to accept as necessary and to practice. It is essential to understand the law of attraction in order to apply the law of allowance. The composite of thoughts, opinions and attitudes of each individual generate the experience patterns of living. Through the flow of daily experiences these are filtered through this composite of each one’s total collective experience. In this way the pattern or matrix is in a dynamic and fluid process. When attitudes and opinions are deliberately programmed within a limited set of rigid guidelines, the activity level of the total pattern of experience begins to slow. The key is the word deliberately. This means that the guidelines are imposed, not by the individual through knowledge experienced into wisdom but by the beliefs imposed on the individual by those he/she considers outside authorities. The pattern of each individual as a whole attracts to itself life experiences that resonate in harmony with that pattern. If a person desires some thing or some experience that does not resonate with that pattern, it is difficult, if not impossible to attract it. Two divergent patterns cannot blend cohesively."

And I can see some thinking that this new fangled way of living and interacting within their reality might seem kinda stark and could be considered sorta ascetic. But such is not the case, to wit…

"Among the nuances of the application of the laws is the necessity to understand that it is necessary to live "within" the laws. It is within the law of allowance that it is appropriate to discuss abundance and luxury. A dictionary often contains much wisdom and is most helpful in reaching greater understanding. According to Webster’s New World Dictionary, abundance is "great plenty, more than enough." Luxury is "the enjoyment of the best and most costly things, anything contributing to such enjoyment, usually something not necessary." Therefore abundance is living within the law of allowance for it allows all to also live in abundance. Luxury encompasses living in extraordinary abundance. It is also very important to emphasize that abundance is not necessarily the same thing to each (individual).

This 3rd ‘Law’ has by itself the potential to have the single largest impact in our lives. It is also accords the greatest demonstration of allowing those who need to learn life’s lessons the ‘freedom’ to fully immerse themselves within those experiences. For in no other way can one fully come to understand the impact and consequences that the choices that are made really do have unless and until we make them and fully experience the net results. If someone steps in and ‘corrects’ our choices before we make them, the full meaning of the learning process is subverted even before it has a chance to begin. It is also relevant to note that each of us is in the situation we find ourselves BECAUSE there is something we need to learn/experience to further our growth. To ‘rob’ someone of the chance to come to know, through direct experience, a necessary life lesson usually just means that it will be repeated at a later time and place. In the final analysis these experiences that we seek, are WHY we find ourselves immersed in them in the first place.

The process must be allowed to construct itself within the focused and agreed upon intent. This law is most perfectly applied through confidence in and acknowledgement of every nuance of manifestation as they begin to be experienced not only as a group, but also especially within the daily experience of each individual’s personal life happenings. The new paradigm of experience is a coalescence of all the individual experiences that fit within the agreed upon focus of intent. These are locked in as these are noticed, acknowledged and appreciated. It is the small occurrences that instill the confidence that is at the center of the application of the Law of Allowance. Doubt is a normal human trap, but when the desire for change is deeply felt and held in mental and emotional confidence, it must manifest. This will not be an easy phase, thus the encouragement of small group interaction with the sharing of both knowledge and “happenings” that support the actual reality of experience will strengthen this necessary application. There are those individuals that will accomplish this phase very much on their own. All are appreciated!"

"And lastly is the 4th ‘Law’ the Law of Harmony and Balance

Through the coordinated and integrated action of the first three Laws of the Universe, the 4th Law of Harmony and Balance will manifest into reality. This is not to say that there are no polarity experiences within the Law of Balance and Harmony. Indeed there are, however, there is not the extremes of experience leading to great imbalance. These are merely lessons of discernment that demonstrate knowledge lived into wisdom.

Balance is reached through the understanding and practice of the three basic laws of the universe: attraction, deliberate creation and allowance.

This ‘Law’ is the easiest and in true paradoxical fashion the hardest to achieve in that it naturally follows as a result of practicing and becoming proficient with the 3 ‘Laws’ that precede it. By attuning oneself to the natural ‘flow’ of the universe and in essence getting out of the way and not creating (nor getting caught up in) turmoil and drama, this 4th ‘Law’ manifests as a natural consequence."

Now it should also be noted that these 4 ‘Laws’ aren’t the ONLY ‘Laws’ in all of CREATION, but they are the ones that apply to us down here in this gravity well. And the discovery of their full implementation and subsequent meaning will not happen without diligence and persistence. But to begin the process does not involve a complicated series of steps or the like, since they are at least on their surface, quite simple. But as with so many other aspects of life, those pesky details will all too soon become more and more apparent as they are consciously applied.

"…This new paradigm of experience will be accomplished through the understanding and application of the basic Laws of the Universe—focus, intention and allowance bringing forth the end result of balance and harmony. This would appear to be quite simple when considered in its basic conceptual understanding. However, to apply these principles in the midst of coercion, chaos and confusion in a firm trust and knowing that the Laws are working when there is no physical proof to justify that all-important belief is not a simple task. When the 5 senses cannot be trusted to tell each committed individual what is happening, then the process is not simple or easy in its application.

And to ‘help’ us become more proficient in utilizing these ‘Laws’, learning how to be present really helps.

This will require living within present moment reality. Within this focused group experience balance will be attained. The past cannot be applied and the future will be unknown. That will leave only the present."

And as a last parting thought, here is another related concept, that being, that thoughts think. This idea is further explained in much more detail in the 3 books. This next paragraph also helps to put the activity and function of the ‘Laws’ into a broader context from which much additional insight can be gained.


While all are curious about what the “big” picture looks like, it would indeed be impossible to explain. It is to be remembered that as “thought thinks,” nuances of change can cause major differences in outcomes. Because freewill is a major component in the process of creation and allows for diversity within wholeness, the mediating factor within the working of the Laws of the Universe is the ability for thought to think within the whole. In other words, “thought thinking” can consider all nuances of change through out the whole and compensate for effects that the finite mind has no way of considering. It is the wisdom that evolving consciousness strives to emulate. The Laws of the Universe are totally compatible and cooperative. When the Laws are invoked, and intent and purpose are in cooperation with them, there are never disagreements or discussions as to what, how, or which method or approach is right. It is simply done in the most advantageous way! There is no ego involvement as is present in situations of less evolved thought processes. It is these ideals that are sought in the dimensional progress of evolving consciousness. As these are mastered, each progressive life experience provides for new and different challenges to be lived into wisdom.



JJ
ps Note: Please excuse some of the 'extra' commentary as it was orginally written for a different 'audience'.

johnjen325
22nd June 2015, 22:09
The online UCC form options have limited the complete list permissible in a way that neuters it from the standpoint of what we want to do. Be careful because filing incorrectly can land you frivolous charges.

Yes 'playing' in the UCC sandbox is not for the uninitiated, nor for those who haven't been 'trained'.
And the training is not only limited but carefully controlled as to whom qualifies to be trained.

Finding a person qualified to deal with UCC filings would be necessary.

JJ

johnjen325
23rd June 2015, 00:00
And just to further load up this whole area of investigation just a touch more…

The whole notion of contracts and agreements also applies to our extended families.
Both our soul and dna 'lineage' involves extensive contractual underpinnings, which take preceedence over anything going on down here in this gravity well.
With the proviso that we know about them, and accordingly take them into account.

This too is part of the deception being perpetuated upon humanity.
We have been labeled as being stupid (and worse) because we don't 'protect' ourselves, even when challenged.

It's hard to utilize resources and capabilities that are within ones grasp when there is a lack of awareness of even their existence, let alone the specifics that are involved in the first place. And this level of responsibilty for oneself also requires practice, which is where training/education/experience comes into play.

The extent and dynamics involved at these levels of soul and dna family interaction takes the phrase "exchange of consideration' to whole 'nuther levels.

JJ

johnjen325
23rd June 2015, 02:37
And I just saw this which might add some more insights

http://sitsshow.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-ucc-connection-how-uniform.html

JJ

lcam88
23rd June 2015, 02:55
I don't think the UCC is neither good or evil, don't fall into the trap of becoming less then rational because of mere inflections. That would be like surrendering your right to come to your own conclusions.

Daozen
23rd June 2015, 10:53
SWORN AFFIDAVIT- I reserve the right to alter this as I see fit.

>>>


The individual is sovereign, and the expression of the highest universal law, provided he does not attempt to impose his will on another. Local councils are subordinate to sovereign humans, provincial governments are further subordinate to local councils, and so on. The Federal government is the lowest law of the land, not the highest. I do NOT consent to world government, and I will not put any energy behind any attempts to control humanity, or trick us into consenting to another control system. Sovereign humans, working alongside the creator, are the highest authority on Earth. All other institutions are subordinate to the sovereign human. All contracts implying control, hierarchy, or tacit consent, are hereby revoked, eternally. All contracts I signed are retroactively deemed to be written -without prejudice-

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/without_prejudice

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffersonian_democracy

We find that the people of Earth have been tricked into implied, unstated and secret contracts with groups of questionable and murderous intent.

It is my intention to write a NOVATION and renew the agreement between myself, the people or Earth, and the creator. This agreement shall supercede all previous agreements. There is no evidence to prove that this following agreement should not be the highest law on Earth.

NOVATION

The VATICAN AND ALL RELATED CORPORATIONS IN, ON AND EX-TERRA, (Transferor), a corporation duly organized and
existing under the laws of THE HOLY SEE with its principal office in
VATICAN CITY; Contact Point, a sovereign being duly
organized and existing under Universal Law, with its principal office
in Taipei; inter into this agreement as of 23rd June 2015.
(a) THE PARTIES AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING FACTS:
1. CONTACT POINT has entered into certain contracts with Transferor, namely:
Implies debts and Papal Bulls too numerous to mention.

The Term “THE CONTRACTS,” as used in this Agreement,
means the above contracts and purchase orders, including all modifications,
made between Contact Point and the THE VATICAN before the effective date of this
Agreement (whether or not performance or payment have been completed
and releases executed if Contact Point or THE VATICAN has any remaining rights,
duties, or obligations under these contracts and purchase orders). Included
in the term “THE CONTRACTS” are also all modifications made under the
terms and conditions of the contracts and purchase orders between Contact Point
and the Vatican, on or after effective date of this Agreement.

2. As of 23rd June 2015, the Transferor has transferred to the
Transferee all of the assets of the Transferor by virtue of a NOVATION
[insert term descriptive of the legal transaction involved] between the
Transferor and Transferee.
3. The Transferee has accepted all the assets of the Transferor by virtue of the
above transfer.
4. The Transferee has assumed all obligations and liabilities of the Transferor
under the contracts by virtue of the above transfer.
5. The Transferee is in a position to fully perform all obligations as they may
exist under the contracts.
6. It is consistent with Contact Points’s interest to recognize the Transferee as the NOVATION AGREEMENT
successor party to the contracts.
7. Evidence of the above transfer has been filed with The Creator under Universal Law.

(b) IN CONSIDERATION OF THESE FACTS, THE PARTIES AGREE THAT
BY THIS AGREEMENT-

1. The Transferor confirms the transferto the Transferee, and waives any claims
and rights against Contact Point that it now has or may have in the future in
connection with these contracts.
2. The Transferee agrees to be bound by and to perform each contract in
accordance withe the conditions contained in the contracts. The Transferee
also assumes all obligations and liabilities of, and all claims against, the
Transferor under the contracts as if the Transferee was the original party to
the contracts.
3. The Transferee ratifies all previous actions taken by the Transferor with
respect to the contracts, with the same force and effect as if the action had
been taken by the Transferee.
4. Contact Point recognizes the Transferee as the Transferor’s successor in the
interest in and to the contracts. The Transferee by the Agreement becomes
entitled to all rights, titles, and interests of the Transferor in and to the
contracts as if the Transferee were the original party to the contracts.
Following, the effective date of this Agreement, the term“CONTRACTOR”
as used in the contracts, shall refer to the Transferee.
5. Except as expressly provided in this Agreement, nothing in it shall be
construed as a waiver of any rights of Contact Point against the Transferor.
6. All payments and reimbursements previously made by Contact Point to the
Transferor, and all other previous actions taken by Contact Point under the
contracts, shall be considered to have discharged those parts of Contact Point’s NOVATION AGREEMENT
obligations under the contracts. All payments and reimbursements made by
Contact Point after the date of this Agreement in the name of or to the Transferor
shall have the same force and effect as if made to the Transferee and shall
constitute a complete discharge of Contact Point’s obligations under the
contracts, to the extent of the amounts paid or reimbursed.
7. The Transferor and Transferee agree that Contact Point is not obligated to pay or
reimburse either of them or otherwise give effect to any costs, taxes, or other
expenses, or any related increases, directly or indirectly arising out of or
resulting from the transfer or this Agreement, other than those that Contact Point
in the absence of this transfer or Agreement would have been obligated to pay
or reimburse under the terms of the contracts.
8. The Transferor guarantees payment of all liabilities and the performance of
all obligations that the Transferee (i) assumes under this Agreement; or (ii)
may undertake in the future should these contracts be modified under their
terms and conditions. The Transferor waives notice of, and consents to, any
such future modifications.
9. The contracts shall remain in full force and effect, except as modified by this
Agreement. Each party has executed this Agreement as of the day and year
first above written.

Furthermore...

I break, revoke and vapourize all implied, unstated and secret contracts.

I do not consent to any interference from any military organisation attempting to stop me from claiming my destiny, or slow the spread of water and food technology on Earth. I do not give permission or energy to any entity, human, draco, alien or group attempting to trick, distract or destroy my attempts to liberate myself and my own timeline. I claim dominion and ownership of my timeline, and the Earth I inhabit.

I do not consent or give permission for cloning technologies to be used in any timeline that I own. I claim dominion over my timeline.

I don't accept the false belief that I, or any human being, am subordinate to any external agency, government, self-proclaimed royalty, or military organisation.

I claim full ownership of my sovereignty, my destiny, and my timeline.

I ask that the charlatans and enemies of humanity are healed and/or removed. If they won't accept healing, I ask that they are removed from this reality and taken back to source for processing. Humanity has voted overwhelmingly to be free, and I ask that my family, and all militaries related to them, plus all sentient beings that hear this prayer, are moved to help us liberate ourselves.

I am a sovereign being. I also have links with other off-world and intra-terrestrial cultures. Knowing this,

I call on ALL groups, forces, nations and people reading this, where-ever they are, to unite and work towards the above goals on EVERY level imaginable, in all areas of time. Furthermore I ask that any groups, forces, nations and people working to inhibit or slow down the spread of these ideas, or to imprison mankind, be immediately neutralized and removed from power, with alacrity, force and civility. I ask that the bonds of power surrounding this Earth, and illegal contracts and power structures, be dissolved in vast energetic currents.

I also ask that any individual or group working towards his or her own sovereignty, or the sovereignty of another person, groups, nation or city, be afforded the highest possible protection from the most advanced groups, nations, forces or people in existence.

I ask that any contracts signed on my behalf, plus any implied or quasi contracts are rendered broken, null and void, as they were signed or implied without my permission. I ask that Earth enters into a new agreement with the highest service-to-others oriented groups in existence.

Furthermore I ask that any group, nation, force or person in possession of advanced or ancient technology that can increase the service-to-others vibration on Earth use it to its fullest effect, clearing any negativity throughout the whole planet, and adding infinitely powerful healing energy to every human being on Earth on all levels.

*

This contract will be further ratified and perfected by a series of opinion polls attempting to gauge the mood of the people of Earth. We will convene a series of votes on the method and manner of governance on Earth.

All claims and rebuttals have to be in public, in 3D, on this thread. No implied or etheric, or otherworldly claims are accepted.

I believe that the contents of this my witness statement are true and accurate. My username as stated above.

I swear, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I call the universe, and all higher courts and notaries, in their entirety, to witness this signing.

Thanks for listening, Universe.

Further Affiant sayeth not.

Signed,

Contact Point, A sovereign being on Earth. Tuesday, June 23, 2015

Daozen
23rd June 2015, 11:25
Affidavits

http://www.lawfulrebellion.org/2009/11/23/get-government-to-lawfully-agree-that-youre-not-a-person-subject-to-acts/

Daozen
23rd June 2015, 11:28
From the above link:

One of the great deceptions of official agencies is the use of the Stare Decisis doctrine. Stare Decisis originates from Common Law courts and it is in Common Law that the principles of precedent decisions exist. Precedent decisions do not have to be used in Admiralty courts: http://topics.law.cornell.edu/wex/Admiralty

So an official agency sends another party a document. The document gets ignored (lethal in Admiralty), and so the agency sends out a follow up of some kind. If the document gets ignored again then the Common Law doctrine of ‘Stare Decisis’ gives the official agency summary judgement; the case is now already decided and cannot be argued.

Q. What is a Notice of Fault and Opportunity to Cure and why do I need to use one?

A. A Notice of Fault and Opportunity to Cure is correct procedure and therefore gives the Affiant uncompromised standing. There may be a very genuine reason why the Respondent couldn’t respond; maybe a death in the family, maybe they were hospitalized etc. So you are saying, “just in case there is a genuine reason why you couldn’t respond I am kindly granting you a further three (3) days to respond. You are being nice, and so you should be, as you want to stay honourable at ALL times.

Q. Do I have to put all the points on my affidavit?

A. No of course not. Make sure it is your truth and besides you can always create more affidavits at anytime. Affidavits create ‘your’ law; law between the parties. So if you are not happy with their law, create your own. Yours are far more powerful in every single way if done correctly. Your affidavit can have one single point or hundreds; it is your document so you can make it whatever you want and for whatever suits your purpose.

Q. Why is a private affidavit so powerful?

A. Basically because as a private man/woman you can operate under unlimited commercial liability and public entities cannot. You see all public entities have what is called a ‘scope of office’ – which is basically a job description and conditions for which they have limited liability insurance cover. For instance, if a Police Officer believes that you are becoming threatening or aggressive he can make the decision to use appropriate force to restrict and arrest you. Now if in the tussle you fell and broke your arm, the Police Officer does not have to worry about prosecution because using appropriate force in this situation is in his ‘scope of office’ and therefore falls under his limited liability insurance policy. But, if the Police Officer was to punch you in the face whilst you were sat in your car, he can now be prosecuted for a criminal offence. If the prosecution stands then his insurance would not cover him in anyway. Therefore he could do jail time, be fined and lose his job as his actions did not fall under his insured ‘scope of office.’ EVERY public official, agent and employee has a ‘scope of office’ – that’s worth remembering!

Daozen
23rd June 2015, 11:40
http://freedompool.org/

Three Useful Tools

We want to establish facts for the record, but it is best to be careful making positive statements (that may have to be proven); instead, whoever is making demands, put it on them to make positive statements - make them prove it.

1) Negative Averment: An averment that is negative in form but affirmative in substance that must be proved by the alleging party. “There is no evidence that I am not correct in this matter and there is no evidence that you are not wrong in this matter, and I don’t believe that any such evidence exists.” You’re stating what is not; not what is.

2) Confession & Avoidance: A response in which the accused admits (via passive acquiescence) the allegations but asks for additional facts that deprive the admitted facts of an adverse legal effect. Accusation: "Is this your signature on this document?" Response(s): "Is there a defect in that instrument?" “Well tell me the defect is and I’ll correct it.” Frogdot 1246675 “Well, if there is no defect in the instrument, then why are you here?” “Why should I answer your question when you can’t even answer mine?” “Are you telling me that you are not even qualified to make any determinations on that negotiable instrument?" “Why are you here?”

3) Conditional Acceptance: A response, in honor without argument, that is a counter-offer. The only offer that is ever relevant is the one on top. Offer: "Let's go to town and go shopping." Counter-offer(s): "Sure, just come over and help me finish cleaning up the kitchen first." "I'll accept that upon proof of bona-fide claim in the form of a signed affidavit by you under penalty of perjury and under your own personal, unlimited commerical liablility within 30 days."

Daozen
23rd June 2015, 11:53
From Lawful Rebellion:


6. Prepare a Notice of Default and once again continue with the above process. Once you have a ‘default’ judgement from the Notary you now have a bona fide lawfully binding agreement/contract.

Now if you so wish, every time that you need to inform a ‘public’ entity that you have a lawful agreement with Gordon Brown, d/b/a Prime Minister (or whoever) then simply make another ‘Certified Copy’ and send it to them; the affidavit copy and the default copy. If they still dare to proceed (extremely unlikely), maybe subpoena the CEO of the UK, in this instance Gordon Brown… it would be a laugh and raise a few eyebrows hey! In truth once you have a valid and lawful agreement you shouldn’t even be going to court, that’s their little playhouse of fairytales, so let them keep it and take care of your business administratively on the private side.

I remember studying what is sometimes (erroneously in my opinion) called ‘Commercial Redemption’ under Winston Shrout and I would hear Winston say the following statement on many occasions, “If you don’t like their law, then create your own.” For months I didn’t grasp quite what he meant and Winston is a great teacher (spiritually as well as commercially), and so I believe he was waiting for folk to ‘have the ears to hear’ this particular loaded message, yet I received the light-bulb moment early whilst watching and studying Winston’s ‘Commercial Lien’ DVD (which I highly recommend). My often research buddy and friend, Guy, had the very same light bulb moment a few weeks later whilst watching the exact same DVD without any interaction between us regarding this matter, and so we knew we were on to something when we shared our individual experiences. Then Guy met with Winston at a private seminar and informed him of what we were currently doing and showed him our private material; Winston was suitably impressed and informed Guy that our method was absolutely rock solid and the correct and lawful procedure. To be truly honest we already sensed this but of course it is always a pleasure to receive confirmation from someone who has inspired your learning. Since then we have had this information confirmed time and time again, yet as stated before, we didn’t really need this confirmation as our confidence in this process felt very solid; and once you realise who you really are I am sure you will comprehend, or already do comprehend, what I am talking about.

Remember it is the agreement of the parties that is important. Their law is contract law, and theirs is built on fraud and deception, so create the contracts that you want, not what they want, and yours will be built on fact and truth. If they do not rebut or reply to your paperwork (they won’t) then you have a ‘lawfully binding’ agreement that no other party can lawfully or legally impair. By the way, if the respondent violates the contract then you have instant lien right, but that is for another day. My personal opinion is this; affidavits and maritime liens (which are affidavits of obligation from the private side) wipe the floor of everything in their laughable and weak fictional system.

Maxims of law. (Affidavit based)

An un-rebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce.

An un-rebutted affidavit is acted upon as the judgement in commerce.

An affidavit must be rebutted point-for-point.

(Research on Maxims with large sample listing)

If you don’t like the idea of creating and sending in such an elaborate affidavit as the one provided, and yet you have situations that would benefit from getting the other party into an agreement, then just a very few points can have an almighty effect. Example:

Affiant is a private living sentient man.

Affiant is not JOHN SMITH or any other artificial entity/legal fiction.

The Affiant is not liable to or for any Government statutes, rules and/or codes, including, without limitation, UNITED KINGDOM Codes and statutes and/or codes of any of Respondents’ political subdivisions.

The Affiant is not liable for JOHN SMITH or any artificial derivative thereof at anytime whatsoever.

The Affiant is not liable for any public debts/liabilities at any time whatsoever.

The Affiant is not a member of any society whatsoever and therefore the Affiant is not bound by any society’s statutes, rules or codes.

Now if the above six (6) points are your truths (and they should be) and you put them on an affidavit to the Respondent, the Respondent has to provide evidence to the contrary of all the 6 points if they want to rebut. I think you can see for yourself that they won’t be able to do that. I think you will also notice that you don’t even have to use the above 6 points; 1 would be enough for most cases, but try and think of any situation you are involved with that couldn’t be solved by having a lawfully binding agreement/contract such as the above.

Folks;

Stop messing around in fear, controversy, statutes, and other self limiting ways; many of the limiting ways I witness on this and many other forums. Create the law you want with the corporate entities. Once you realise who you are and why your true identity and power has been kept at bay, you will realise why a private sovereign affidavit is so powerful. Keep your original affidavits very safe and keep ‘certified copies’ on you at all times. An enforcement agent will only proceed so far after they have checked the validity of your paperwork; because you will have made sure of the following:

Daozen
23rd June 2015, 12:03
Im still not sure if I need a UCC filing, as I am non US based, and the UCC has only been around since 1952... I don't recognize it.

Daozen
23rd June 2015, 12:10
http://www.irmi.com/expert/articles/2003/orlando06.aspx


One of the principal differences between a maritime lien and a land-law-type lien is that a maritime lien does not depend on either notice or possession. The only type of maritime lien which does get recorded in any type of registry is a preferred ship mortgage. Thus, maritime liens are generally thought of as silent liens, and possession of the subject property is not a requirement for the existence of such a lien.

Another major difference between a maritime lien and other types of liens is that maritime liens may only be enforced under the maritime jurisdiction of a federal court, at which point the marine equipment can be "arrested" by a federal marshal to be brought under the jurisdiction, and thus control, of the federal court.

Daozen
23rd June 2015, 12:20
Liens

http://www.kboi2.com/news/local/94483204.html

http://www.marineliens.com/maritimeliens.asp

http://www.jerrymeek.com/five-things-every-plaintiffs-lawyer-should-know-about-tax-law/

Daozen
23rd June 2015, 12:26
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UCC-1_financing_statement

lcam88
23rd June 2015, 13:50
Note: the cornell link regarding admiralty does not mention salvage!

Point of contention: Would it be a more powerful statement to declare a type of salvage on the apparent abandoned state the god-create human being as may be found, Perhaps from the aspect of spirit and soul? Then move to claim sovereignty and dominion in the domains and realms where the salvaged subject-matter then finds itself? That would be such a better form to novate away the existing "clutter" without having to enumerate all the things what we know about not to mention what we don't know.

Is anyone willing to contemplate this strategy here with me?

Divine Feminine
23rd June 2015, 16:08
I'm just briefly following what you're doing, but wanted to echo the same advice of being careful about liens. Not too long ago I was researching statues in the state of Oregon for a friend when I came across one addressing liens being put on government officials/judges or something to that effect. I wish I still had the link, but I think this article covers it. Love the slanted reporting by NPR, lol....anyways.....

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=215838773

People such as Tim Turner, Rod Class and others like them, have gotten real savvy at teaching people about liens and it's starting to have an effect within the court systems. It appears they(government officials) don't like their own medicine thrown back at them, boo-hoo.


I can shed some light on this one:
http://www.kboi2.com/news/local/94483204.html

"And when she filed a claim on her title insurance, First American denied it."

"But the Ada County Recorder's Office has no record of the $45,000 debt against the Nielson's home."

"The letter from First American says although it denied the Nielson's claim, it would be paying the claim made by their bank, Wells Fargo."

I suspect this woman was 'paid off' as if she pursued a legal case it would have opened a huge can of worms that 'they' don't want the public to know. There's a whole lot more of 'non recording' going on at these Recorder's offices and both the banks and Title Insurance companies are involved. Title Insurance companies, (all of them) have what some call a 'wrap-a-around' clause in their insurance polices in the Schedule B exclusions section that basically says they don't have to cover you if the proper recording isn't done at the county recorders office. I've looked at a lot of policies and I have yet to find one that doesn't have this clause in it. You bet they don't want this coming up in court because once Americans on a mass scale figure out these boobs are clouding the titles of their homes by improper recordation procedures, they're going to be beyond ****ed and both the Title Insurance companies and the banks are heavily involved in constructing this debacle via the entity known as MERS in which they are responsible for both funding and creating.

Daozen
23rd June 2015, 21:48
Note: the cornell link regarding admiralty does not mention salvage!

Point of contention: Would it be a more powerful statement to declare a type of salvage on the apparent abandoned state the god-create human being as may be found, Perhaps from the aspect of spirit and soul? Then move to claim sovereignty and dominion in the domains and realms where the salvaged subject-matter then finds itself? That would be such a better form to novate away the existing "clutter" without having to enumerate all the things what we know about not to mention what we don't know.

Is anyone willing to contemplate this strategy here with me?

Never heard of Salvage. Sounds cool.


The law of salvage is a concept in maritime law which states that a person who recovers another person's ship or cargo after peril or loss at sea is entitled to a reward commensurate with the value of the property so saved. The concept has its origins in antiquity, with the basis that a person would be putting himself and his own vessel at risk to recover another and thus should be appropriately rewarded. A related consideration was widespread piracy; a vessel in peril could very well be left for pirates if the owner did not generously reward a potential honest salvor. Salvage law has been recognized for centuries in such documents as the edicts of Rhodes and the Roman Digest of Justinian.[1] It is still a nearly universally recognized right, though conditions for awards of salvage vary from country to country.

Contents [hide]
1 Concept of salvage under Maritime Law
2 Conditions required
2.1 Recognized subject matter
2.2 Real danger
2.3 Voluntary service
2.4 Success
3 Salvage under contract
4 Minimizing danger to the environment
5 Jurisdiction
6 Time limit to claim the salvage
7 See also
8 References
Concept of salvage under Maritime Law[edit]
The right to be rewarded for salvage at sea under common law is based both on equitable principles and public policy and is not contractual in origin. Historically, salvage is a right in law, when a person, acting as a volunteer (that is, without any pre-existing contractual or other legal duty so to act) preserves or contributes so to preserving at sea any vessel, cargo, freight, or other recognized subject of salvage from danger. This is the typical case of salvage and is distinct from Prize law, which is the rescuing of property from the enemy at a time of war, for which a reward is made by the Court of Admiralty sitting as a Prize Court.

The law seeks to do what is fair to both the property owners and the salvors. The right to salvage may not necessarily arise out of an actual contract but is a legal liability arising out of the fact that property has been recovered. The property owner who had benefit of the salvor's efforts must make remuneration, regardless of whether he had formed a contract or not. The assumption here is that when faced with the loss of his vessel and cargo, a reasonable prudent owner would have accepted salvage terms offered, even if time did not permit such negotiations.

Daozen
23rd June 2015, 21:52
Divine Feminine, I will definitely be careful. The next step is some sort of Lien, but I will study hard before filing it. I have heard of blowback from liens too. The first step is to perfect the wording and let it 'stand before infinity' so to speak.

This thread has a strange backstory. I have had people, in physicality, approach me out of the blue and tell me I had to get various projects done. One of them was getting my contracts right. They were polite, persistent, and insistent. Many different people delivered the same message, in multiple countries. If they hadn't approached me, I would think I was just some guy playing around with legal language. But this is more real than I know. All I can say is, I feel good today.

That's why I said it was an affidavit, instead of a declaration, because all declarations are notarized somewhere in creation.

Daozen
24th June 2015, 00:52
That would be such a better form to novate away the existing "clutter" without having to enumerate all the things what we know about not to mention what we don't know.

Is anyone willing to contemplate this strategy here with me?

I can see your thinking. I chose the Vatican, but what if the Fed or the Bank of England think they have a claim on me too? I will do it one by one, but I think there must be a simple way to VOID all claims. It's something like negative averment: There is no one who can prove in writing that the have a claim on me, and therefore... no one does.

We should also stipulate that all claims and rebuttals have to be in public, in 3D, on a designated thread. (I will add that in now)

Could anyone give me an example of Salvage wording?

Cheers.

Daozen
24th June 2015, 00:58
https://www.norclub.no/assets/ArticleFiles/Agency-LOF-2011.pdf

johnjen325
24th June 2015, 04:29
Note: the cornell link regarding admiralty does not mention salvage!

Point of contention: Would it be a more powerful statement to declare a type of salvage on the apparent abandoned state the god-create human being as may be found, Perhaps from the aspect of spirit and soul? Then move to claim sovereignty and dominion in the domains and realms where the salvaged subject-matter then finds itself? That would be such a better form to novate away the existing "clutter" without having to enumerate all the things what we know about not to mention what we don't know.

Is anyone willing to contemplate this strategy here with me?

I don't entirely understand what you are saying.
I think what your approach centers around is a 'reversal' of ownership, or nullifying any and all claims which we may or may not be aware of, but which are 'in force' by those who claim ownership.

I agree that this approach, if implemented 'properly' would be more inclusive and more thorough.
The 'trick' (it seems to me) is in being inclusive and yet not falling into the 'trap' of requiring all of the specifics in order to negate and nullify all the existing contracts etc.
This is a tall order in that the language used must be precise, exact, inclusive and not limiting.

Heather in her UCC filings seemed to do a masterful job of achieving these goals.


Also there are several other attempts to extricate ourselves from the existing contractual arrangements that exist within which we are bound.
Andrew Bartzis, Heather and others have published contract removal documents on the web.
Perhaps they might provide additional insights…

JJ

johnjen325
24th June 2015, 05:05
speaking of papul bulls…

http://sitsshow.blogspot.com/2013/08/the-power-of-papal-bulls-black-magick.html

JJ

lcam88
24th June 2015, 13:34
Wording must always be precise. Sorry everyone, I as yet have not recovered that contract from my backups. Very soon.


I think what your approach centers around is a 'reversal' of ownership, or nullifying any and all claims which we may or may not be aware of, but which are 'in force' by those who claim ownership.

Actually, it is more about redefining what ownership the states may claim actually is. On page two I go into a bit of detail between the person and the human being. Use of salvage in any meaningful way would involve the recognition of a salvageable hitherto unrecognized crown jewel human-being and creating a distinction between the person and the human. I really chose my words carefully in that posting I made on page 2.

The presumption I am making with such statements as "novate away everything known or unknown to us" is simply that state contracts made hereto are actually only with the person, that which is not the human-being being salvaged.

Those contracts state may claim with the person are made in at least the following forms (please feel free to complete the list).

1. An actual signed or tacitly signed paper (a vessel upon which words and terms are the cargo).
2. A law passed by a representative we "elected" who signed on our behalf (or an officer who defines rules for his crew).
3. Beneficiary obligations founded in possibly secret trusts structures where upon receiving benefits we are bound to some set of obligations. Citizen-hood being an example. (implied rules the captain certainly also means)
4. Imposed conditions made by someone claiming acting on fiduciary obligations on behalf of society, government or public interests of some type that somehow bind based on one of the above 3 underpinnings. (explicit rules the captain made as he went along)

NOTE: The objective is not to demolish the persona or abolish it from existence. It is just to make the distinction and create presumption that the human is indeed separate and distinct from the person. Many of us still depend on benefits offered by society and would find it difficult or impossible to properly care for ourselves without those benefits!

We need to reserve the right to act only as surety that the artificial person will continue to follow all norms insofar as an act by the human is made in its name. Furthermore, the human absolutely reserves the right to perform actions separately from the artificial person and it is recognized that such acts are not in the knowledge, concern or privilege for the artificial person to notice unless indeed the human-being wishes it, or the situation requires it (ie in front of a law enforcement agent who can only deal with the person).

I further presume: We are not trying to escape from our responsibilities as responsible citizens, rather we seek to claim and weld the powers of the sovereigns we certainly are.

Does that clarify things?

EDIT: Insight is good. I just don't have much time to do the ground-pounding research these days. I'm sharing my latest thoughts here with you all for your entertainment more than as a demonstration of my intention to actively pursue. This salvage idea is something that came to mind just yesterday; I'm not sure if anyone has really looked at it. The goal is not to compromise the person in a way that prevents the human from being able to use the tools at his disposal, the person actually is a valuable tool (until someone manages to create a breakaway society). As this idea is developed I may just pursue it to the end, but it must make sense first.

Daozen
24th June 2015, 16:00
The 'trick' (it seems to me) is in being inclusive and yet not falling into the 'trap' of requiring all of the specifics in order to negate and nullify all the existing contracts etc.
This is a tall order in that the language used must be precise, exact, inclusive and not limiting.

I have turned the wording over in my head for 2 years. The first step is just to get out there and write something. Like starting to tidy a dirty house. You just grab a box and throw things in.

I saw the papal bulls info before. I guess it's true. Interesting that Rome worshiped Jupiter. That would align with the info in Jupiter Ascending. Maybe the Vatican is a major point of contact for the Exo-empire.

Question: How would you refer to a supposed off-world empire in a legal document, without looking crazy?

Daozen
24th June 2015, 16:05
I am thinking of creating an office called: Warden of Earth, or something similar, and -this is key- making it an office that ANYONE could claim for themselves. Disputes would not be resolved by direct paramutiel voting, but by competing decentralized polls.

So if you want to "outlaw" GMO'S, you set up a poll, and infinity can gauge the results from the poll.

I don't believe in representative democracy, it hasn't worked. Everyone has to step up for themselves. Humans need to contract with infinity individually. Works fine for Youtube and Facebook. A decentralized structure like that dissolves any opportunity for power grabs and top-o-the-pyramid squabbles.

Daozen
24th June 2015, 16:06
How would I put a Lien on a large political entity?

I will start here, on this thread, just stating the case before infinity. Does anyone have any idea on the wording?

Cheers.

Daozen
24th June 2015, 16:08
NOTE: The objective is not to demolish the persona or abolish it from existence. It is just to make the distinction and create presumption that the human is indeed separate and distinct from the person

Will add this.

So... what is the legal equivalent of banishing? Voiding?

lcam88
24th June 2015, 20:35
Question: How would you refer to a supposed off-world empire in a legal document, without looking crazy?

Designatio unius est exclusio alterius, et expressum facit cessare tacitum. The appointment or designation of one is the exclusion of another; and that expressed makes that which is implied cease. Co. Litt. 210. (http://www.lawfulpath.com/ref/bouvier/maxims.shtml)

I'd use language like: ... any entity, sentient or artificial [corporation], however socially organized unless explicitly exempted for due consideration as per Exhibit A,...

That would even encompass known and secret earth based authorities. You can then include a page entitled "Exhibit A" where you declare organizations or entities that are exempt from your offer. The first item being the artificial person whom has been created as part of the introduction to this distinction between it and the human.


...Warden of Earth...

Yes!

and one of the services offered by the office is a court jurisdiction! Open Court Perhaps.

another service maybe can be an online service where you aim to elevate a digital signature to binding in worldly contracts so that online petitions can have equivalent legal weight. I have wanted to do this for some time now.


So... what is the legal equivalent of banishing? Voiding?

You are missing the point.

We want to deflate and overcome the following presumptions 1) the person is the human, 2) that control of the person is equivalent to control of over the human, 3) that the person is anything more than the registers held in an archive, whether computer or paper based.

We want to introduce the presumptions that 1) the person and the human are separate and distinct entities, one artificial [corporation] and the other created by god and in gods image, 2) the person is the citizen, and the human is the sovereign, 3) that the human, even while accepting the burden of being surety for the person, can never be introduced as part of the registry or archive that defines a person, not by representations backed by scientific affirmations of genetic similarity, or by any other means that excludes explicit and willful acceptance thereof.

In order for the human-being to remain sovereign, the human-being may _never_ accept a benefit [offered by a society] that comes encumbered by trust type structures which are designed to introduce beneficiary obligations.

To solve that impass, I propose that the person (until now confused with the human-being) should continue to exist as a distinct artificial entity that serves the human alongside its previous master, so that benefits offered may still be accepted honorably , and yet without encumbering the human with beneficiary obligations.

I maintain: The acceptance of these beneficiary obligations are the [B]equivalent to surrendering sovereignty.

In my view, that is precisely where the problems start. It is the genesis of how the person acts in a way that emburdens him to the task of carrying the wooden yoke. I may be wrong about all of this. But as yet, I do not know that I am.

The person is free to re-contract considerations and benefits as it sees fit, including to the human, without the encumbrances that where part of the original offer. The unlimited right to contract being exercised.

Consider: if you abolish, ban, terminate, expunge or void the person, you cannot use it as an ally or mediator with the state that seeks to recognize it.

Daozen
25th June 2015, 08:10
I see your point about separating the person and the being. I think this an important aspect of the new contract. I still think learning how to lien is a priority. A good contract would include all of these aspects.


Designatio unius est exclusio alterius, et expressum facit cessare tacitum. The appointment or designation of one is the exclusion of another; and that expressed makes that which is implied cease. Co. Litt. 210. (http://www.lawfulpath.com/ref/bouvier/maxims.shtml)

I'd use language like: ... any entity, sentient or artificial [corporation], however socially organized unless explicitly exempted for due consideration as per Exhibit A,...

That would even encompass known and secret earth based authorities. You can then include a page entitled "Exhibit A" where you declare organizations or entities that are exempt from your offer. The first item being the artificial person whom has been created as part of the introduction to this distinction between it and the human.




and one of the services offered by the [Warden of Earth] office is a court jurisdiction! Open Court Perhaps.

another service maybe can be an online service where you aim to elevate a digital signature to binding in worldly contracts so that online petitions can have equivalent legal weight. I have wanted to do this for some time now.

I agree on the signatures. Online notarization is already here.

Then we can talk about jurisdiction and open courts. Can you hold an online trial?

Lots to think about here... I will turn it over these next few days. After separating the person and the legal entity, I want to start learning how to lien. Step one, just doing it in infinity...

Best,

lcam88
26th June 2015, 12:06
I don't have exacting knowledge about drafting a lien. I do have a model that was used by Winston Shrout if you are interested. But that said, I will just touch on how difficult my experiences have been with enforcement.

Online trials seem rather odd. But it may make sense in some context not yet clear to me. I think structured debates is likely the better beginning; part of self-governance is willful choice in doing what is right for everyone in your midst, perhaps by providing something meaningful to followers. For online court to work, you require a following that will accept judgement rendered from it. That is the requisite in my view.

If your view is to try and impose judgement on some other body yet reluctant to recognize your authority, in a way, you are no better than an ordinary court and there would be no meaningful to seek the online court.

Daozen
26th June 2015, 12:55
Impose is a difficult word. I am not imposing, what I am doing is stating a higher truth, and notifying the universe that I do not consent to their lower truth. I'm not so much imposing anything on them, just setting limits around myself that they may not transgress. As you may have worked out, there is a deeply magical aspect to law.

The Winston Shrout doc is interesting, thanks. I will quickly look myself.

*

Now... onto real world change. Gardening, water purification and microfinance are all real world declarations of independence. To leave the deep legal conversation for a moment:

One of the most revolutionary things any human could do now is research how to set up a non-profit in the US/UK/EU/HK or TW. Just a simple non-profit that donors could donate to while writing it off against tax. There is benevolent money out there looking to Microfund humanitarian projects. One of the tasks I was entrusted with was establishing a surface node to let hidden monies flow. There is plenty of money out there, I just need to get the legal aspect down. I cannot guarantee when the money would come, but establishing a non-profit is a vital first step.

I am looking at the paperwork aspect now but don't know where to start. If anyone has any ideas on how to cut down on research time, I'm interested.

Cheers.

Daozen
26th June 2015, 13:02
NOTE: I will be using this thread and my blogspot to establish a point of dialogue with "Cassandra" of the recent "Requested Letter."

theruiner777.blogspot.hk/2015/06/requested-letter.html

The intention is to provide clarification on some of the points she has made, and offer an orderly stand-down, instead of a protracted state of attrition that drags on over many years. I believe it is in everyone's best interests to aim for healing, and a reasonable discussion of the current situation.

My notes on this thread will be concise, as I only have limited time at my disposal. Thanks for reading.

Daozen
26th June 2015, 13:13
Dear Cassandra,

Thank you for taking the time to write down your point of view. It's interesting to receive a window into your mindset and thinking. While I intensely dislike what you are doing to my world, and therefore my family, I have a certain respect for your tenacity, strategic thinking, and warrior spirit.

Having said this, I do not think it is fair that 7 billion people should suffer at the hands of a few hundred self-elected rulers. So I am afraid that I do not consent to living in the timeline you are building. I do not give permission for you to do this in the world I am making.

The first question is: Why would I need to plug into a computer to link to heaven, when I have a link to infinite love right inside my chest? I cannot feel it all the time, but if I meditate deeply, I know the creator is there with me.

If you listen to the following track, you will maybe get a sense of the energy human beings can link to, any time they desire:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XGPozMcFkME

There's nothing better than the feeling of connection with the true inner heaven. After the Grid is taken away, I believe that humans will naturally go back to a more organic existence.

I have repeatedly cited the failure of Google Glass as a major turning point in the transhumanist vs humanist conflict. The public and press rejected it, and we will continue to do so, even as more 'enticing' tech is rolled out.

Therefore, I suggest it is in everyone's best interests that you reconsider your plan, and accept the window of healing that is being offered. I hope you contact every nation that is currently aware of our group.

Thanks for reading.

Sincerely,

Contact Point

Daozen
26th June 2015, 13:23
Dear Cassandra,


And as the lion feeds on anything it can we do unto you. A few may act or feel differently but the focus remains on the majority not the few lonely villages questioning and dreaming.

With all due respect to your technology, maybe it is humanity that is the trapped lion. What will happen when the grid is switched off? No one knows. The responses in the comments section on the Ruiners blog showed that many people were not cowed by your threats. Many humans are starting to wake up to their true power.

Lonely village? There are 7 billion of us. I wouldn't take the low view counts on the Ruiners blog as a true barometer of humanity's mindset. Many of us are aware of the corruption in governments. In Asia, Africa and South America, many people are aware of the exo-political situation, and that awareness is increasing. Maybe it is the current leadership that is the true lonely village. You are outnumbered.

Anyway, I am not here to negotiate. I am just denying you permission to continue your agenda in the timeline our group is weaving, and offering you healing from the civilizations sponsoring us, should you choose to take it.

I will be taking legal steps to ratify my decision over the next few days. I am a spark of the eternal creator, and I can contract with the creator as I see fit, with NO intermediaries between myself and the infinite.

More than a few of us are aware of this loophole.

So maybe we can try and work together to bring a happy ending to this prolonged tragedy. Maybe you can discuss this situation with your friends, and come to a new agreement. The offer will be on the table for a period of time.

Faithfully,

Contact Point

Daozen
26th June 2015, 13:37
Note. I do not give permission for anyone to interfere with me energetically or physically. I do not consent to energetic interference on any level. This written contract with infinity shall subsume all others.

If you like videos of Lions, here are two of my favourites:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vnmxg4h_Mio

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LU8DDYz68kM

I swear under penalty of Perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Friday, June 26, 2015

Contact Point,

lcam88
26th June 2015, 16:31
PM sent with link to some document models.

EDIT: Are you interested in a model of a UCC 8-102 (15) security instrument? If you are, it's a good idea that we go over the UCC in a way that may prevent you from misunderstandings or inappropriate (possibly illegal) applications of these documents.

Daozen
27th June 2015, 03:20
EDIT: Are you interested in a model of a UCC 8-102 (15) security instrument? If you are, it's a good idea that we go over the UCC in a way that may prevent you from misunderstandings or inappropriate (possibly illegal) applications of these documents.

I will draft everything and let it stand in infinity first. Then I will file, but only when I have a thorough understanding of the filing process, will I file something. I note that they are not sending us personal courtesy notices, so Im wondering why I should have to do it to them.

For now, it's all about 1) Creating the office of Warden of Earth. 2) Learning basic Lien practices. 3) Writing surrender documents.

This post drops hints about the backstory:

http://jandeane81.com/threads/6679-Declaration-of-Independence-Drafting-in-Progress?p=841928723&viewfull=1#post841928723

Daozen
27th June 2015, 03:51
Don't know who wrote this, but I agree with it.


"You've damn near voided your agreement with us by inspiring this fiasco so tread carefully."

BY THE GRACE GRANTED UPON ME BY MY REAL FATHER/MOTHER (THE SOURCE) AS THEIR LEGITIMATE SON/DAUGHTER, I INVOKE MY RIGHT TO DECLARE THIS CONTRACT FULLY NULL AND VOID EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY!

Those in agreement, say, AYE!

Daozen
27th June 2015, 03:52
AnonymousJune 25, 2015 at 11:36 AM
These comments got Cassandra smiling from cheek to cheek.

Reply
Replies


The RuinerJune 25, 2015 at 11:43 AM
This writer wishes you were right. Truth is she likely looks more like a child who was just told they cannot have the newest video game they desire.

With respect,

Daozen
27th June 2015, 04:06
PERFECTIING


http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/jupiter-ascending/images/9/9e/Hel2.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20150311214054



Affidavit of Obligation

Commercial Lien. Contact Point vs Cassandra + Co.

(This is a verified plain statement of fact)

1. PREAMBLE/LEGAL MAXIMS


Maxims:


All men and women know that the foundation of law and commerce exists in the telling of the truth, the
whole truth, and nothing but the truth.
Truth as a valid statement of reality is sovereign in commerce.
An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce.
An unrebutted affidavit is acted upon as the judgement in commerce.

Guaranteed—All men shall have a remedy by the due course of law. If a remedy does not exist, or if the
existing remedy has been subverted, then one may create a remedy for themselves and endow it with
credibility by expressing it in their affidavit. (Ignorance of the law might be an excuse, but it is not a valid
reason for the commission of a crime when the law is easily and readily available to anyone making a
reasonable effort to study the law.)

*





Most of us have been hypnotized into believing that the meaningless scribbles of "legislators," "Presidents," etc., constitute "the law." After reading this chapter, one thing should be absolutely clear to you. The law is whatever you give your consent to. This insight frees you from being a "victim" and a "subject," and restores you to your rightful position of power and sovereignty. (Always remember, though, that Territorial Gangsters [TG's] have all sorts of ways to obtain your "consent"! Standing up for your rights always involves risk.)


Our Founding Fathers believed that it was self-evident that the God of Nature is the sovereign of the universe and everything in it (as well as mankind) and that He had endowed all mankind with "certain unalienable rights" making them self-directing sovereigns, which means that any governments instituted among men derive their just powers (only) from the consent of the governed, who are the source of earthly power and authority. Hence any attempt to exercise any powers NOT conveyed by the People is unjust and unauthorized, and any act done pursuant to such usurpation of power is void.


They were further convinced that God's temporal law for mankind was expressed in the law of the land. Common law is common-sense law. It is simple, straightforward and self evident, primarily because it is based on God's Laws. It is the foundational law of the union of States.

The Founding Fathers authorized three legal systems in the Constitution, first Common Law, secondly Equity Law, and thirdly Admiralty Law, which is the law of the sea. Gradually Common Law has been displaced by Equity Law until today the Common Law is rarely heard of or understood because it has been covered up and hidden away by the legal profession for very understandable business reasons. Such people are pursuing their own private agenda. In fact the Common Law is generally looked upon as obscene, example: to have a common law marriage is considered to be unclean. Why? The first marriage license in the United States was issued in 1863. The question is not whether some third party should or should not perform the service; it is whether sovereigns must get permission from their servants (the government) before they can be married.

http://www.mind-trek.com/practicl/comliens.htm#appb

*


The Helplessness of Judges

The commercial lien, which is authorized both by the common law and by Title 15 of the United States Code (USC), is reportedly the same lien the IRS uses to take Americans' homes and cars. However, some pro se litigants do not depend upon Title 15, but upon the common law of negotiable instruments (a.k.a. Commercial Law).

As such, it's almost impossible to remove a commercial lien without the approval of the individual claimant who filed the lien. Although a commercial lien can be challenged by a common law court or by a 7th Amendment jury trial, it does not require a court process or a court judgment for its establishment, validity, or execution. Therefore, it appears that the courts may not be able to simply extinguish this lien on their own discretion (or on motion from the lien debtors) without the voluntary approval of the person who filed the lien.

Traditionally, these liens can only be removed by the voluntary decision of the person who filed the lien, by the decision of a constitutional common-law jury trial, or by waiting 99 or 100 years. Since the common law has been smothered in the U.S.A., all judges are essentially powerless to overcome the liens.

*



All corporate government is based upon Commercial Affidavits, Commercial Contracts, Commercial
Liens and Commercial Distresses, hence, governments cannot exercise the power to expunge commercial
processes.



The Legitimate Political Power of a corporate entity is absolutely dependent upon its possession of
Commercial Bonds against Public Hazard, because no Bond means no responsibility, means no power of
Official signature, means no real corporate political power, means no privilege to operate statutes as the
corporate vehicle.



The Corporate Legal Power is secondary to Commercial Guarantors. Case law is not a responsible
substitute for a Bond.



Municipal corporations which include cities, counties, states and national governments have no commercial
reality without bonding of the entity, its vehicle (statutes), and its effects (the execution of its rulings).




In commerce, it is a felony for the Officer of a Political/Public Office to not receive and report a Claim to
its Bonding Company, and it is a felony for the agent of a Bonding Company to not pay the Claim.



If a Bonding Company does not get a malfeasant public official prosecuted for criminal malpractice within
sixty (60) days then it must pay the full face value of a defaulted Lien process (at 90 days)



Except for a Jury, it is also a fatal offense for any person, even a Judge, to impair or to expunge, without a
Counter-Affidavit, any Affidavit or any commercial process based upon an Affidavit.




Judicial non-jury commercial judgments and orders originate from a limited liability entity called a
municipal corporation, hence must be reinforced by a Commercial Affidavit and a Commercial Liability
Bond.




A foreclosure by a summary judgment (non-jury) without a commercial bond is a violation of commercial
law.




Governments cannot make unbonded rulings or statutes which control commerce, free enterprise citizens,
or sole proprietorships without suspending commerce by a general declaration of martial law.






It is tax fraud to use Courts to settle a dispute/controversy which could be settled peacefully outside of or
without the Court.



An official (officer of the court, policeman, etc.) must demonstrate that he/she is individually bonded in
order to use a summary process.



An official who impairs, debauches, voids or abridges an obligation of contract or the effect of a
commercial lien without proper cause, becomes a lien debtor and his/her property becomes forfeited as the
pledge to secure the lien. Pound breach (breach of impoundment) and rescue is a felony.



It is against the law for a Judge to summarily remove, dismiss, dissolve or diminish a Commercial Lien.



Only the Lien Claimant or a Jury can dissolve a commercial lien.



Notice to agent is notice to principal; notice to principal is notice to agent.



PUBLIC HAZARD BONDING OF CORPORATE AGENTS All officials are required by federal, state,
and municipal law to provide the name, address and telephone number of their public hazard and
malpractice bonding company and the policy number of the bond and, if required, a copy of the policy
describing the bonding coverage of their specific job performance. Failure to provide this information
constitutes corporate and limited liability insurance fraud (15 USC) and is prim-a-facie evidence and
grounds to impose a lien upon the official personally to secure their public oath and service of office.

Parties:
Contact Point/Lien Claimant
c/o Notary Acceptor

Oher PARTIES/Lien Debtor:
Cassandra and related parties: The "Cabal.", "Illuminati" "Bilderberg Group." and any corporate, banking and political entity associated with the debt control system on Earth and beyond. (Hereafter Cassandra and co. )






Allegations:


Allegations arise from the conduct of Cassandra + co acting as owner of Earth 27/6/2015. The
allegations that follow are recorded in “AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH” filed 27/6/2015 at the One Truth Forum and AgarthanAlliance.blogspot.com. NOTE: The ONE TRUTH Forum is only hosting this Lien. I take full responsibility for all legal matters resulting from this thread.

*


Allegations:

Exhibit A

Through various communications, Cassandra and co have revealed themselves to be:

Indifferent to human suffering:


We do not hate you we are indifferent.

Unaware of human efforts to clean the biosphere:


Left to your own devices you act as if you wish to destroy this world for your own comfort and convenience.

Entitled:


The happiest you ever appear is in a state of ignorant bliss so why shouldn't we continue.

Ignorant of true human history:


You had your chances and your perfect world when that wasn't enough we were created to lead you.

Predatory:


And as the lion feeds on anything it can we do unto you.

Ignorant of multiple human efforts to correct the Cabal's legal abuses:


Not once giving us any indication you wish things to be any different.

Presumptious:


You can not be allowed to destroy the planet like your creators designed you to.

Insulting, arrogant:


So we will give you the escape you so desperately want we warn you ourselves and you swallow it like greedy little piglets expecting us to deliver you from your own evil and call it entertaining.

Ignorant, Unfeeling, Conceited:


You have given us no reason to feel any differently than we always have about you and that is why we are building this world for you.

Manipulative:


You will become cybernetic while we allow it after which time you will be fully inserted into a brand new world.

Conniving:


"The Kingdom of Heaven" the bulk of you have been worshiping while we waited for our chance to take over you.

Deluded:


You want a savior and we will save you from yourselves.

Contemptuous:


We will enjoy the fruits of our labor while you sleep and dream as we create our own world for ourselves in which you are not suitable to exist.

Controlling:


You are breathing dead and your time is ours.

Self-congratulatory:


Billions of you and only a few are even reading this and that would still be true even if this was your nightly news station. A capable race would see beyond the swamp to find the fresh water.

Tedious:


My very letter to this man called The Ruiner will be a representation of the fact that you all cannot see truth when it is in front of you and you will always choose the more comfortable free ride provided by leaders who are willing to be responsible for you. Leaders with the strength of will to create the world.

Insulting:


Children is what you are the children of animals. And we will have our utopia without your presence doing anything but powering our new creations. What a hundred readers or more and you think you're all ready to be saved.

Ignorant of overriding legal agreements/Threatening:


To address you the runaways. We hope you enjoy your freedom and wish you luck knowing you need it. You've damn near voided your agreement with us by inspiring this fiasco so tread carefully.

Tedious:


The writer of this blog has tried to argue on behalf of a few thousand humans who are aware of us what we do and how the world really works as if this is some sort of defense of humanity as a whole. These few have always existed and are laughed and ignored because of their own inability to digest the knowledge they have.


They sit at computers and attend conferences that feed the money cycles as if they are outsmarting the system. This is no threat any damage these types could have ever done would have been done long before today.

Provocative:


Go ahead and prove us wrong.

*

And therefore unfit to claim ownership of Earth, humanity, and related civilizations.




Alternate leaders:

Much more capable financial, media and agricultural agencies have appeared over the last 20 years: Kickstarter, Pozible, Social Media, Natural Nutrition, Liposomal Vitamin C, Detoxadine...

Exhibit B:

https://medium.com/@Frodonomics2015/critical-mass-create-a-billion-jobs-now-dfc16d1aa50b

*

Creating a New Legal Office

I hereby create the Legal Office: Warden of Earth. I hereby claim it for myself, working alongside the creator. I claim equal standing to all men and women on Earth, and hereby invite them to create their own legal office, so we may all be on equal ground alongside our true infinite creator. They may also use the name Warden of Earth if they desire. I claim no superiority to any human. I wish the human race to discover it's own sovereignty.


*



An Alternate, Superior Set of Laws...

We hereby copy Winston Shrout's set of laws. We agree with the general spirit of these laws.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letter_and_spirit_of_the_law


1.
A. AM 4 any action against me must be fully described in writing, issued by a court of
law, signed by a judge, and sworn on oath
B. AM 5 no person to be forced to say or do anything that could be used against him later
C. AM 9 all rights belong to the people some are stated some are not
D. AM 13 no law-abiding person shall be forced to act against his will
E. AM 9 all rights belong to the people; some are stated, some are not
F. AM 10 all government power comes from the consent of the people governed
G. AM 14 all persons born or naturalized are US citizens and protected by US Constitution
H. AM 14 all persons equally protected and restricted by law
I. AM 14 no person to hold office if he rebels against or violates US Constitution (treason)
J. AM 14 no state shall make or enforce any law limiting rights of US Constitution
K. AM 14 no state shall deprive anyone of anything without fair trial
L. 101 no state shall set anyone above the common man.
M. 101 no state shall work against US Constitution with anyone
N. 101 no state shall declare war on a person (resort to force) in violation of
Constitution
O. 101 no state shall allow any person or group to make a law, judge on it, and punish
under it
P. 193 no person or group can make a law, judge on it, and punish under it
Q. 331 no controlling agency shall harass a US citizen (mixed war/treason)
R. 431 no controlling agency shall be formed in violation of US Constitution
S. 441 the US to protect every citizen against personal attack or attack on rights
T. 612 “This Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land.”
U. 613 all law makers court officials and enforcement officers are bound by oath to the
US Constitution
2. “He demanded to see papers he thought I might have in my possession.”
A. AM 4 I am safe from any unwarranted searches/seizures
B. AM 4 any action against me must be fully described in writing, issued by a court of
law, signed by a judge, and sworn on oath
C. AM 5 no person to be forced to say or do anything that could be used against him later
D. AM 5 no person to be deprived of anything without due process
E. AM 6 I may require as much in writing as is required of me
F. AM 9 all rights belong to the people some are stated some are not
G. AM 10 all government power comes from the consent of the people
H. AM 13 no law-abiding person shall be forced to act against his will
G. AM 14 all persons born or naturalized are US citizens and protected by US Constitution
H. AM 14 all persons equally protected and restricted by law
I. AM 14 no person to hold office if he rebels against or violates US Constitution (treason)
J. AM 14 no state shall make or enforce any law limiting rights of US Constitution
K. 101 no state shall work against US Constitution with anyone
L. 101 no state shall declare war on a person (resort to force) violation of Constitution
M. 331 no controlling agency shall harass a US citizen (mixed war/treason)
N. 431 no controlling agency shall be formed in violation of US Constitution
O. 441 the US to protect every citizen against personal attack or attack on rights
P. 612 “This Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land.”
Q. 613 all law makers, court officials, and enforcement officers are bound by oath to the
US Constitution.
3. “He had not introduced himself or showed me any identification as proof of his corporate status,
such as a police officer.”
A. AM 4 I am safe from any unwarranted searches/seizures
A Security (15-USC)
A USSEC Tracer Flag
Not a point of Law
5
B. AM 4 any action against me must be fully described in writing, issued by a court of
law, signed by a judge, and sworn on oath
C. AM 10 all government power comes from the consent of the people
D. AM 14 all persons equally protected and restricted by law
E. AM 14 no person to hold office if he rebels against or violates US Constitution (treason)
F. 101 no state shall work against US Constitution with anyone
G. 612 “This Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land.”
H. 613 all law makers, court officials, and enforcement officers are bound by oath to the
US Constitution
4. “He threatened to put me in jail.”
A. AM 4 I am safe from any unwarranted searches/seizures
B. AM 4 any action against me must be fully described in writing, issued by a court of
law, signed by a judge, and sworn on oath
C. AM 5 no person to be deprived of anything without due process
D. AM 6 in actions involving threat of jail accused to have public trial
E. AM 9 all rights belong to the people some are stated some are not
F. AM 10 all government power comes from the consent of the people
G. AM 13 no law-abiding person shall be forced to act against his will
H. AM 14 all persons born or naturalized are US citizens and protected by US Constitution
I. AM 14 all persons equally protected and restricted by law
J. AM 14 no person to hold office if he rebels against or violates US constitution (treason)
K. AM 14 no state shall make or enforce any law limiting rights of US Constitution
L. AM 14 no state shall deprive anyone of anything without fair trial
M. 101 no state shall work against US Constitution with anyone
N. 101 no state shall declare war on a person (resort to force) in violation of
Constitution
O. 101 no state shall allow any person or group to make a law, judge on it, and punish
under it
P. 193 no person or group can make a law, judge on it, and punish under it
Q. 331 only courts can decide punishment and rewards with regards to law
R. 331 no controlling agency shall harass a US citizen (mixed war/treason)
S. 431 no controlling agency shall be formed in violation of US Constitution
T. 441 the US to protect every citizen against personal attack or attack on rights
U. 612 “This Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land.”
V. 613 all law makers, court officials, and enforcement officers are bound by oath to the
Constitution
5. “He appeared to be carrying a firearm, and I presumed it was loaded (both of which he confirmed
later), and since he was becoming very angry I supplied him with the papers he demanded under
fear and threat of duress and or personal injury.”
A. AM 4 I am safe from any unwarranted searches/seizures
B. AM 4 any action against me must be fully described in writing, issued by a court of
law, signed by a judge, and sworn on oath
C. AM 5 no person to be forced to say or do anything that could be used against him later
D. AM 5 no person to be deprived of anything without due process
E. AM 6 I may require as much in writing as is required of me
F. AM 9 all rights belong to the people some are stated some are not
G. AM 10 all government power comes from the consent of the people
H. AM 13 no law-abiding person shall be forced to act against his will
I. AM 14 all persons born or naturalized are US citizens and protected by US Constitution
J. AM 14 all persons equally protected and restricted by law
K. AM 14 no person to hold office if he rebels against or violates US Constitution (treason)
L. AM 14 no state shall make or enforce any law limiting rights of US Constitution
M. AM 14 no state shall deprive anyone of anything without fair trial
N. 101 no state shall work against US Constitution with anyone
O. 101 no state shall declare war on a person (resort to force)in violation of Constitution
6
P. 101 no state shall allow any person or group to make a law, judge on it, and punish
under it
Q. 193 no person or group can make a law, judge on it, and punish under it
R. 331 no controlling agency shall harass a US citizen (mixed war/treason)
S. no controlling agency shall be formed in violation of US Constitution
T. 441 the US to protect every citizen against personal attack or attack on rights
U. 612 “This Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land.”
V. 613 all law makers court officials, and enforcement officers are bound by oath to the
US Constitution
6. “He periodically accused me of breaking some laws.”
A. AM 4 any action against me must be fully described in writing, issued by a court of
law, signed by a judge, and sworn on oath
B. AM 5 no person to be deprived of anything without due process
C. AM 6 in actions involving threat of jail accused to have public trial
D. AM 9 all rights belong to the people some are stated some are not
E. AM 10 all government power comes from the consent of the people
F. AM 14 all persons born or naturalized are US citizens and protected by US Constitution
G. AM 14 all persons equally protected and restricted by law
H. AM 14 no person to hold office if he rebels against or violates US Constitution (treason)
I. AM 14 no state shall make or enforce any law limiting rights of US Constitution
J. 101 no state shall work against US Constitution with anyone
K. 101 no state shall declare war on a person (resort to force) in violation of
Constitution
L. 331 no controlling agency shall harass a US citizen (mixed war/treason)
M. 441 the US to protect every citizen against personal attack or attack on rights
N. 612 “This Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land.”
O. 613 all law makers, court officials, and enforcement officers are bound by oath to the
US Constitution
7. “Without explaining the conditions of the contract and without making any attempt at a full
disclosure, he wanted me to put my signature on a presentment”
A. AM 4 any action against me must be fully described in writing, issued by a court of
law, signed by a judge, and sworn on oath
B. AM 5 no person to be forced to say or do anything that could be used against him later
C. AM 5 no person to be deprived of anything without due process
D. AM 6 I may require as much in writing as is required of me
E. AM 6 in actions involving threat of jail accused to have public trial
F. AM 9 all rights belong to the people some are stated some are not
G. AM 10 all government power comes from the consent of the people
H. AM 13 no law-abiding person shall be forced to act against his will
I. AM 14 all persons born or naturalized are US citizens and protected by US Constitution
J. AM 14 all persons equally protected and restricted by law
K. AM 14 no person to hold office if he rebels against or violates US Constitution (treason)
L. AM 14 no state shall make or enforce any law limiting rights of US Constitution
M. AM 14 no state shall deprive anyone of anything without fair trail
N. 101 no state shall work against US Constitution with anyone
O. 101 no state to pass any law impairing the obligations of contract
P. 101 no state shall allow any person or group to make a law, judge on it, and punish
under it
Q. 111 only Congress has power to make law
R. 193 no person or group can make a law, judge on it, and punish under it
S. 331 only courts can decide punishment and regards with regards to law
T. 331 no controlling agency shall harass a US citizen (mixed war/treason)
U. 431 no controlling agency shall be formed in violation of US Constitution
V. 441 the US to protect every citizen against personal attack or attack on rights
W. 612 “This Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land.”
A Security (15 USC)
A USSEC Tracer Flag
Not a point of Law
7
X. 613 all law makers, court officials, and enforcement officers are bound by oath to the
US Constitution
8. “At that time John Smith wrote something on the presentment, and then he handed me a green
copy that he had torn out of the coupon book. …It appeared to me that John Smith had written
some words on the presentment on the signature line. The words that he wrote on the signature
line were ‘Refused to SiGN’ followed by the words, ‘Served 8/3/2000 1823’ “.
A. AM 4 I am safe from any unwarranted searches/seizures
B. AM 4 any action against me must be fully described in writing, issued by a court of
law, signed by a judge, and sworn on oath
C. AM 5 no person to be forced to say or do anything that could be used against him later.
D. AM 5 no person to be deprived o anything without due process
E. AM 9 all rights belong to the people some are stated some are not
F. AM 10 all government power comes from the consent of the people
G. AM 13 no law-abiding person shall be forced to act against his will
H. AM 14 all persons born or naturalized are US citizens and protected by US Constitution
I. AM 14 all persons equally protected and restricted by law
J. AM 14 no person to hold office if he rebels against or violates US Constitution (treason)
K. AM 14 no state shall make or enforce any law limiting rights of US Constitution
L. AM 14 no state shall deprive anyone of anything without fair trial
M. 101 no state shall work against US Constitution with anyone
N. 101 no state shall declare war on a person (resort to force) in violation of
Constitution
O. 101 no state to pass any law impairing the obligations of contract
P. 101 no state shall allow any person or group to make a law, judge on it, and punish
under it
Q. 111 only Congress has power to make law
R. 193 no person or group can make a law, judge on it, and punish under it
S. 331 no controlling agency shall harass a US citizen (mixed war/treason)
T. 431 no controlling agency shall be formed in violation of US Constitution
U. 441 the US to protect every citizen against personal attack or attack on rights
V. 612 “This Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land.”
W. all law makers, court officials, and enforcement officers are bound by oath to the US
Constitution
9. “John Smith assured me that I must pay money to the court(?) for the ‘charges’ on the green paper
that he signed. That I could be held liable for a contract that I had not been a party to confused
me. It appears that John Smith is under the false presumption that since he signed ‘Refused to
SiGN’ on the contract that Winston Shrout became the liable party.”
A. AM 4 I am safe from any unwarranted searches/seizures
B. AM 4 any action against me must be fully described in writing, issued by a court of
law, signed by a judge, and sworn on oath
C. AM 5 no person to be deprived of anything without due process
D. AM 9 all rights belong to the people some are stated some are not
E. AM 10 all government power comes from the consent of the people
F. AM 13 no law-abiding person shall be forced to act against his will
G. AM 14 all persons born or naturalized are US citizens and protected by US Constitution
H. AM 14 no person to hold office if he rebels against or violates US Constitution (treason)
I. AM 14 no state shall make or enforce any law limiting rights of US Constitution
J. AM 14 no state shall deprive anyhone of anything without fair trial
K. 101 no state shall work against US Constitution with anyhone
L. 101 no state to pass any law impairing the obligations of contract
M. 101 no state shall allow any person or group to make a law, judge on it, and punish
under it
N. 111 only Congress has power to make law
O. 193 no person or group can make a law, judge on it, and punish under it
P. 331 only courts can decide punishment and rewards with regards to law
Q. 331 no controlling agency shall harass a US citizen (mixed war/treason)
A Security (15 USC)
A USSEC Tracer Flag
Not a point of Law
8
R. 431 no controlling agency shall be formed in violation of US Constitution
S. 441 the US to protect every citizen against personal attack or attack on rights
T. 612 “This Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land.”
U. 613 all law makers, court officials, and enforcement officers are bound by oath to the
US Constitution
Surety: There are one-hundred seventy-four (174) listed Constitution and Bill of Rights violations valued
at $10,000 per violation times two (2) Lien Debtors for a total value of this bill of three-million fourhundred
eighty thousand dollars ($3,480,000.00) in Functional Currency of the United States. The
surety/property utilized to guarantee the payment of this commercial lien is the operational/commercial
bonds of each of the Lien Debtors. If the bond(s) of the Lien Debtors is/are insufficient for coverage
the payment(s) the assets of the Lien Debtor(s) will be utilized as follows: all the real and moveable
property and bank and savings accounts and of the Lien Debtors except wedding rings, keepsakes,
family photographs, diaries, journals, etc., and the property normally exempted in the lien process
(includes survival provisions).



I, Contact Point, certify on my own full commercial liability that I have read the above affidavit and do
know the contents to be true, correct and complete, and not misleading, the truth, the whole truth, and
nothing but the truth, and do believe that the above described acts have been committed contrary to
law.

Contact Point. 27th June, 2015.
___________________________
Contact Point
c/o Notary Acceptor
Tamsui, Taiwan

*

PENDING? I invite all observing civilizations to ratify this lien immediately. Thank you.

NOTARY
On this date, _____________________________, a man who identified himself as Contact Point
appeared before me, a Notary, and attested to the truth of this affidavit with his signature.
_________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC
Seal

Daozen
27th June 2015, 06:23
This is an excellent introduction to commercial liens:

http://www.mind-trek.com/practicl/comliens.htm

Daozen
29th June 2015, 10:14
• As a filing under UCC is not only a tacit recognition of the present Western-Roman legal system as well as a conveyance of rights to the associated American Bar Associations and their members to address the matter, any claim that a UCC filing can be used to deduce a superior position is both absurd and lunacy; and

• Because the liability for any UCC filing initially rests with the party making the claim, if the party filing fails to perfect the claim by the methods stated, then the party making the claim and their estate are liable for the amount of the claim; and

• In recent years, there has been several waves of false gurus and disinfo agents promoting UCC remedy either deliberately or stupidly resulting in large claims being lodged through UCC filings, which have then been assigned to court cases and securitized by gaining long convictions against the people who filed such paperwork.

A brief safety check before you “jump off the cliff” using promised remedy;

http://blog.ucadia.com/2013/02/a-brief-safety-check-before-you-jump-of.html

Trusts- what are they?how do they work? and other answers

http://blog.ucadia.com/2013/03/trusts-what-are-theyhow-do-they-work.html

Lots of interesting comments and insights here:

http://www.lawfulrebellion.org/2009/11/23/get-government-to-lawfully-agree-that-youre-not-a-person-subject-to-acts/

Daozen
29th June 2015, 10:20
From the above site:


Hi
I would just like to let everyone know that i have WON a claim against HSBC bank for £150.
The bank put a stop on my debit card as they thought a fraudulent transaction was being carried out.
I told them that i was making a lawful transaction and they had stopped me from carrying out an act of commerce and that in order to get my card re-activated, the bank had asked me to enter into a contract with them to un-block the card.
I informed them that i would invoice them accordingly for my time and any letters and phone calls as they arose. Eventually I invoiced the bank £285
after the bank initially claimed that they did not owe me anything, they eventually offered me £50 as good will , so i wrote back and said i would accept it as part payment of the bill.
Eventually, the bank paid me a further £100 and I accepted it as full and final settlement.
So the moral of the story is – if your bank blocks a lawfull transaction bill them when they ask you to go to the bank and unblock your card. It’s their offer to you to do business with them.

Swansea UK