PDA

View Full Version : UK for sale



Ria
20th July 2014, 16:09
UK for sale: Uniquely in the world, Britain has sold more than half its companies to foreigners. And we are all paying the price
By ALEX BRUMMER
Just for a moment, imagine being a tourist in search of the full British experience. Where would you start? Well, you might take a sight-seeing trip around London on a red double-decker bus.
You’d possibly visit a quintessentially British store, such as Boots the chemist, Selfridges or Harrods, before having a proper English tea at the Savoy, Fortnum & Mason or the Dorchester.
You’d almost certainly go home, via a British airport, thinking you’d seen a slice of the real Britain. But, in one sense at least, you’d be totally wrong.

British icon? Most London buses are run by a Spanish company
That bus you boarded at Trafalgar Square is run by a German company. Boots fell to the Italians in 2007. Selfridges, Fortnum & Mason and the Savoy are owned by Canadians; Harrods has been bought by a firm based in Qatar; the Dorchester by one based in Brunei. As for our airports, most of them are now run by a Spanish firm.
Maybe a tourist wouldn’t care all that much, even if he knew. But should we? After all, does it make any real difference if a British company has a foreign master?
For the past three decades, the UK has had a completely relaxed attitude about selling off its assets to companies based abroad. Indeed, most of the time, the swallowing up of yet another great British institution barely makes a headline.

Sell off: Boots is owned by Italians, and headquartered in Switzerland
We may be a nation of homeowners, but we’ve lost our taste for ownership of our own economy and public services — from once-great manufacturers such as ICI to most of the companies that deliver our electricity, water and gas.
Even this week, it became clear that the Government is happy to consider letting a Russian firm, the one behind the Chernobyl accident, run some of Britain’s next generation of nuclear power stations. In fact, to date, we’ve sold off more than half our assets to foreign owners.
And the pace is escalating. In the face of political indifference, foreign companies acquired £30billion worth of British enterprises in 2009. In 2010, that rose to a value of £54.5 billion.

Deregulation: Former Tory Chancellor Geoffrey Howe made it easier for foreigners to snap up British companies
Foreign corporations also currently control 39 per cent of UK patents. This is far more than the percentage of foreign-owned patents in the U.S. (11.8), Japan (3.7) or even the European Union as a whole (13.7).
At this rate, it’s been said, it won’t be long before we’re all working for foreign companies. So how did we become so attractive to overseas predators? The answer is that it happened in stages, starting with the removal of regulations on overseas investment by former Tory Chancellor Geoffrey Howe in 1979.
This was followed in 1986 by what’s known as the ‘Big Bang’, when a raft of restrictive old practices in the City of London were swept aside. Soon, foreign banks flooded into the City, gobbling up venerable British minnows such as SG Warburg, Robert Fleming and Schroders.
Then came Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, who were so keen to keep in with big business that they refused to block any deals — even when the Russians eyed up British Gas.
Indeed, anyone — like me — who dared question the great British sell-off was instantly labelled a xenophobe, out of touch with the reality of the modern globalised economy.
What tipped the balance towards foreign takeovers in the late Nineties and 2000s were three key factors: the cheap cost of borrowing; liberal takeover rules; and the presence of global investment banks in the City, with ready access to the world’s capital.
Throughout the boom years, these banks were allowed to write their own rules. What this meant, in essence, was that a bank which might once have considered it risky to lend ten times its share capital would now lend up to four times that amount.
The result? Foreign companies took full advantage of all this cheap and easy credit to snap up increasing numbers of great British brands.
Not only that, but our eccentric tax system actually made it more profitable for overseas owners to buy companies with borrowed money. For example, foreign firms who buy British companies using borrowed money are able to deduct the interest they have to pay on those loans from their tax bills.

Stripped: The private equity firms who bought Debenhams left the chain a shadow of its former self
And this had a direct effect on jobs in the UK. Weighed down with often massive debts, new owners were far less likely to invest in the future of the firm and were instead more likely to close down factories and plants, throwing thousands of Britons out of work.
Some foreign firms even adopted the practice of making a fast buck by buying a company, stripping its assets and then selling for a quick profit. A classic case was that of the once-great department store, Debenhams, bought in 2003 by two U.S.-based private equity firms. Within three years, they’d stripped the firm of investment, loaded it with debt and sold it on at a big profit. By then, Debenhams was in such an enfeebled condition that it has taken years to recover.
Worse still was what happened to the care homes provider Southern Cross, which came crashing down last spring. The company had been pieced together by a hard-headed U.S. equity firm called Blackstone, after it started buying up care homes across the country.



VIEW FULL ARCHIVE
Most of its income was guaranteed, as it came from local authorities. But Blackstone wasn’t prepared to be a long-term owner. Soon, it had hived off many of the freeholds of the buildings to another company, which then sold them off.
Then Blackstone made a quick profit by floating Southern Cross on the stock market, collecting £600 million for itself and its wealthy investors.
At the time, Blackstone said they believed that the care homes, with their guaranteed source of income, were capable of being self-financing. But the aftermath from the sale of Southern Cross was disastrous.
When new landlords started putting up rents, local authorities were unable to meet the extra cost. A lack of investment and poor management combined to bring Southern Cross to the brink last year, placing its 750 homes at serious risk.
Three thousand jobs had to be cut from the workforce, raising questions about the quality of care in the homes. Eventually, some of the landlords dropped their rents, some took over care homes themselves — and some have yet to come to an agreement with the company.
Shockingly, as it turned out, this high-stakes financial game had been played at the expense of 31,000 elderly and vulnerable residents. Meanwhile, elsewhere in Britain, one great company after another was being blithely auctioned off — including Jaguar Rover (to India), Asda (to the U.S.), MG Rover (to China), P&O Ports (to Dubai), the British Airports Authority (to Spain), Corus (formerly British Steel, to India), British Energy (to France), and lottery operator Camelot (to Canada).
It didn’t matter whether the buyer was a foreign company or a private-equity fund. If the price was good enough, shareholders and directors took the money and ran.
As firms fell like ninepins around them, canny chief executives demanded new clauses in their contracts that guaranteed the equivalent of lottery wins if their firms were taken over. They did this by insisting that their share options — usually paid out only after a number of years — could instantly be converted to cash.

Apathy: No-one seemed to notice - or care - when ICI was snapped up by the Dutch
Ah, argued defenders of this system, but surely all these deals also brought much-needed injections of cash into the economy?
And yes, of course, they did — in the short term.
But no one was thinking any further ahead. No one had bothered to work out that if it was hard enough to collect taxes from a UK-based multinational, it might be even harder to do so from one based in Munich, Lucerne or Washington DC.

Paying the price: ICI's subsequent breakup resulted in the loss of thousands of jobs
If that sounds highly theoretical, then consider what happened after Boots the chemist (Alliance Boots) was sold to the Italian pharmacy king Stefano Pessina and private-equity barons KKR in 2007 for £12 billion.
Soon after the takeover, Boots — which had been based in Nottingham for 161 years — moved its headquarters to Zug in Switzerland. Why Zug? Well, certainly not for its climate.
Before the takeover, Boots had paid £89 million in British tax in its final year as a quoted company on the London stock market. Now that it pays its tax in Zug, that figure has shrunk to just £9 million.
So the financial rewards from all these foreign takeovers rarely swell government coffers for long. Hence, as more and more British companies vanish overseas, it’s the ordinary taxpayer who has to make up the difference — through higher VAT and other taxes.
As well as tax revenue, what is even more worrying is that we’re rapidly losing the crucial skills we need to compete with the rest of the world.
The real tragedy is that no one seems to care when a company like ICI, the great chemicals giant, disappears into the jaws of a foreign power — taking with it scientific and industrial expertise built up over many decades.
The truth is that the 2008 Dutch takeover of ICI was, arguably, far more significant than the sell-off of Cadbury, which caused deep public unease. Chocolate, it seems, will always stir more sentiment than paint and chemicals.
ICI was vulnerable to foreign interest for two reasons: the lack of Government interest in its possible future and the shareholders’ greed for cashing in — to the exclusion of other considerations. So no one gave much thought to what might happen next.
The ICI integration into Holland’s AkzoNobel was far from painless. Within days of the merger, they were jettisoning some of ICI’s assets — such as its adhesives and electronic materials activities, which were sold to a German competitor. Some 29 factories, including several in the UK, were closed, eliminating 3,500 jobs.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2129507/Britain-sale-Uniquely-world-Britain-sold-half-companies-foreigners-And-paying-price.html

Ria
20th July 2014, 16:18
Branston pickle this week became the latest British food firm to be gobbled up by a foreign company.

The iconic brand, a must-have ingredient on ploughman’s lunches and cheese sandwiches for generations, has been bought by a Japanese company in a £92.5million deal.

It is just the latest in a long list of much-loved British makes which are now in the hands of overseas companies.

But it is not just food. Companies stretching from the high street and holidays, to car makers and even the national lottery are now controlled by businesses abroad. The figures are startling. According to the Office for National Statistics, more than 41% of UK companies are foreign owned if youlook at their shares.

That’s up from just under 31% in 1998 and a mere 7% in 1963.

Between April and June this year, overseas firms spent £2.6billion buying no less than 42 UK companies.

Last year foreign companies bought £33billion worth of UK businesses.

And while UK firms can go the other way, and buy businesses abroad, in reality many other countries have barriers that make it much harder for them to do so.

Here, we look at just some of the great British names that have been sold abroad in recent times…and ask what it means for the UK.


Robertson's

Like Branston pickle, the marmalade firm was owned by Premier Foods.

It was sold, along with other famous spreads like Hartley’s jam, Gale’s honey and Sun-Pat peanut butter to an *American firm Hain Celestial for £200million earlier this year.


Rolls-Royce


Perhaps the most British of car marques, Rolls-Royce was bought by Germany’s Volkswagen Group in 1998 as part of a £430million deal.

However, in an embarrassing move, it was forced to hand the trademark to arch rival BMW. VW got to keep Bentley, however. BMW also owns one of Britain’s other most famous car brands – the Mini.



Weetabix
.
Chinese company Bright Foods bought the majority stake in the company, which also makes Alpen and Ready Brek, valuing the firm at £1.2billion.



Cadbury

Andy Rain

US food giant Kraft paid £11.9billion for the chocolate firm in a hostile take-over in 2010. It promised to safeguard jobs – then closed a factory near Bristol and transferred production to Poland

Newcastle Brown Ale

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/british-brands-that-are-now-owned-by-

Branston pickle this week became the latest British food firm to be gobbled up by a foreign company.

The iconic brand, a must-have ingredient on ploughman’s lunches and cheese sandwiches for generations, has been bought by a Japanese company in a £92.5million deal.

It is just the latest in a long list of much-loved British makes which are now in the hands of overseas companies.

But it is not just food. Companies stretching from the high street and holidays, to car makers and even the national lottery are now controlled by businesses abroad. The figures are startling. According to the Office for National Statistics, more than 41% of UK companies are foreign owned if youlook at their shares.

That’s up from just under 31% in 1998 and a mere 7% in 1963.

Between April and June this year, overseas firms spent £2.6billion buying no less than 42 UK companies.

Last year foreign companies bought £33billion worth of UK businesses.

And while UK firms can go the other way, and buy businesses abroad, in reality many other countries have barriers that make it much harder for them to do so.

Here, we look at just some of the great British names that have been sold abroad in recent times…and ask what it means for the UK.



Robertson's



.

Like Branston pickle, the marmalade firm was owned by Premier Foods.

It was sold, along with other famous spreads like Hartley’s jam, Gale’s honey and Sun-Pat peanut butter to an *American firm Hain Celestial for £200million earlier this year.



Rolls-Royce

PA
.

Perhaps the most British of car marques, Rolls-Royce was bought by Germany’s Volkswagen Group in 1998 as part of a £430million deal.

However, in an embarrassing move, it was forced to hand the trademark to arch rival BMW. VW got to keep Bentley, however. BMW also owns one of Britain’s other most famous car brands – the Mini.



Weetabix

PA
.
Chinese company Bright Foods bought the majority stake in the company, which also makes Alpen and Ready Brek, valuing the firm at £1.2billion.



Cadbury

Andy Rain
.

US food giant Kraft paid £11.9billion for the chocolate firm in a hostile take-over in 2010. It promised to safeguard jobs – then closed a factory near Bristol and transferred production to Poland.



Newcastle Brown Ale

Daily Mirror
.

Scottish & Newcastle, makers of the famous ale, was bought by Dutch brewer Heineken and Denmark’s Carlsberg in 2008 for a combined £7.8billion.

S&N was the UK’s largest and world’s seventh biggest brewer. It was split between Carlsberg and Heineken.



Jaguar Land Rover


.

Car giant Ford sold the luxury arm of the firm – which makes the Range Rover Evoque (pictured) – to Indian company Tata, India’s biggest vehicle maker, for £1.15billion in 2008.



Camelot


.

The National Lottery operator was sold to a *Canadian pension fund for almost £400million in 2010.



Boots

The chemist chain and beauty *business was bought by private equity firm KKR and billionaire Italian Stefano Pessina in an £11billion takeover in 2007. After 161 years being based in Nottingham, the new owners moved the firm’s HQ to Swiss tax haven of Zug. They sold a 45% stake to US retailer Walgreen for £4.3billion earlier this year.



Raleigh

PA
.

Iconic British cycle manufacturer, famous for the Chopper and Grifter, bought by Dutch rival Accell for £62million earlier this year. Raleigh was once the biggest cycle maker in the world, employing 10,000 and producing two million bicycles a year.



Asda

PA
.

The supermarket, now Britain’s second biggest grocery chain, was bought by American retail giant *Wal-Mart in 1999. The deal valued Asda at £6.7billion.



Comment: Professor Dominic Swords, Henley Business School
It is a huge disappointment to see an iconic brand like Branston not staying in British ownership .

One of the reasons for the sale of the brand is that Premier Foods relied too much on debt to expand.

Now they’re finding they’ve got to reduce those debts by selling off some of their best assets.

Many of Britain’s *businesses look good value if you’re a foreign investor, because the pound has weakened over recent years.

Put that with foreign companies wanting to snap-up what are famous global brands and you have a perfect storm that’s seen UK companies fall into foreign hands.

Regulation hasn’t helped matters either, and we have a *particularly open policy towards investment that isn’t street-wise enough.

We have seen a lot positive aspects of having foreign investment – you only have to look at the car industry for that. However, it is a matter of balance.

If we are also trying to create a more balanced range of businesses in our economy then we should not only be locating activity in the UK but also the ownership and control of those businesses.

Because of all that, I think we should have some restrictions on parts of British industrial ownership.

I don’t think there is anything wrong with that as part of building growth in the UK and building on the strengths that are part of our industrial heritage and culture.

It is not about protectionism but, as in Germany and France, having a positive attitude towards *Government supporting certain industries.

Sanef - a French Company - has been awarded the lease rights of the Dartford Crossing (already bought and paid for by the UK residents several times over) for the next 7 years (starting September this year) with an option for a further 3 years.

Another French Company - Veolia Environmental Services - handles UK waste and water.

SO UK has been invaded by stealth. This cannot be a unique state of affairs and those forum members from other countries will (probably) find the situation is exactly the same if they check.

Wolf Khan
20th July 2014, 23:47
Well obviously brits don't want to preserve their legacy. Afterall they are selling themselves away to foreign slavery.

Lord Sidious
21st July 2014, 09:24
Hate to be the bearer of ill will, but seeing as the so called empire was built on the back of every group the scum in charge could loot, it seems like a karmic cycle is closing.

Ria
21st July 2014, 12:48
Hate to be the bearer of ill will, but seeing as the so called empire was built on the back of every group the scum in charge could loot, it seems like a karmic cycle is closing.

It is the ordinary people that bare the brunt of this. You can't hold the people accountable for the heads of state actions.
It is a form of insanity. I personally don't won't the government, the church etc, doing what they are doing. Do they listen? No. There have been mass protests supporting the Palestinians, has it been reported on the news? No. Very little.

Seikou-Kishi
21st July 2014, 13:57
Hate to be the bearer of ill will, but seeing as the so called empire was built on the back of every group the scum in charge could loot, it seems like a karmic cycle is closing.

Do the first seven words of this post indicate you posted with ill will? :-p

Ria
21st July 2014, 19:48
Do the first seven words of this post indicate you posted with ill will? :-p

No it dose not indicate L Sidious bares any ill will and I know him to be a person working to bring out the truth and peace to peoples that have been tormented and lied about.

In broad terms thinking pay back or karma visiting back on people when more often than not they are not the prime perpetrators is problematical and muddies the waters to the truth of the situation.

Seikou-Kishi
21st July 2014, 23:21
No it dose not indicate L Sidious bares any ill will and I know him to be a person working...

I put my trust in Sid's greater ability to take a joke :-)

Lord Sidious
22nd July 2014, 01:57
I put my trust in Sid's greater ability to take a joke :-)

I have seen you before, this is true.