PDA

View Full Version : Sasquatch Vocalizations 3.0



Pages : [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

jimmer
22nd September 2013, 21:03
ON MARCH 3, 2015 THE TITLE OF THIS THREAD WAS CHANGED TO BETTER REFLECT
A RESPECT FOR THE SASQUATCH PEOPLE AND TO EXPRESS OUR GROWING KNOWLEDGE
OF THIS MOST IMPORTANT SUBJECT.

this is the updated reboot of the original thread: Bigfoot Vocalizations.

the previously posted google links to the archived beginnings of this
thread are no longer active and have been removed.
please enjoy the original mike paterson videos and radio interviews from those posts, displayed below.

if you are new to mike's sasquatch adventures, I suggest you click through to his YT site
and watch the videos from the beginning. the journey is unique.
https://www.youtube.com/user/MANASOOCAN/videos?sort=dd&view=0&live_view=500&flow=grid

mike patterson radio interview 1 (http://www.blogtalkradio.com/stonegraphics/2012/11/17/mike-paterson-from-ontariocanada)

mike patterson radio interview 2 (http://www.blogtalkradio.com/inspiringfriends/2013/07/17/inspired-by-bigfoot-07-16-2013)

mike patterson radio interview 3 (http://www.blogtalkradio.com/bigfoottonightshow/2013/08/19/mike-patterson-sasquatch-ontario)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yabkhwK2iDs&feature=player_embedded#t=0


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ip1ntcXRfRY&feature=player_embedded#t=0


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g105YbfbugY&feature=player_embedded#t=0


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpJK60a5VZk&feature=player_embedded#t=0


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rV1Qa-qpkYo&feature=player_embedded#t=0

jimmer
22nd September 2013, 21:08
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fnz4cQGkNf4&feature=player_embedded#t=0


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiAY9-_8-KU&feature=player_embedded#t=0


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-V9CBAID1s&feature=player_embedded#t=0


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeqWTsXSOFM&feature=player_embedded#t=0


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5T8BGDoe_I&feature=player_embedded#t=0

bigfoot community goes ballistic.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yB9Ta7bLJZQ&feature=player_embedded#t=0

a defender.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80guWGMR44Y&feature=player_embedded#t=0

jimmer
22nd September 2013, 21:15
thanks malc.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onaobjHksic&feature=player_embedded#t=0

breakthrough. (this is the 'nephatia' video and has been removed by mike)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRqAiZpOUk0&feature=player_embedded#t=0

thanks frances.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSOcrw37Yi4&feature=player_embedded#t=0


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWS2LR7jq6g&feature=player_embedded#t=0

jimmer
22nd September 2013, 21:16
why has mike been so long in posting new stuff?

here's his response to my query, "Hiatus?" (reposted with mike's blessing, from two separate PMs)

Sasquatch Ontario
Re:Hiatus?
I had another video uploading jimmer but had an issue and lost the work.
I have to remake it which I'll get right at when I get home today.
I threw out the rough copy before all was said and done cause of hard drive space.
Bad mistake. LIve and learn. It was many hours of work down the drain.
Oh well. It won't take as long the second time as I know how I had it laid out.

It was just hours of work down the drain. I'd thrown all the files, photos that had the
descriptions typed on them, etc. in the trash as I thought I was done.
I realized I wasn't happy with one part of it and cutting it out affected the audio so
I had to trash the whole thing. Crap. Oh well. Back at it.

for those of you who haven't seen this yet, after a long wait, here's mike's latest:
direct give and take + more mind blowing.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S03d1ipNDbA&feature=player_embedded#t=0

where's the baby sas in the copyrighted photo?
from mike:

Tree on the right, follow the inside line from the bottom.
About center frame is a leaf in between the two trees.
His chin is at the top edge just outside the edge of the tree.
Bigger leaf above that covers his eyes. His nose is just below that
leaf touching the edge of the tree. Skin is about the same colour as the tree bark.
Gray skin. Top edge of that leaf above center frame shows his brown hair.
You can see his hair line on his forehead. His head is tilted looking out from behind right tree.

hint: look smaller, than bigger.

jimmer
22nd September 2013, 21:18
frances' original video post was taken down. here's another copy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbUsEBO6C2M

George Knapp interviews researcher and author David Paulides.

Covering the sinister and shocking disappearances of adults and children from national parks, Forrests of North America.
No full account of these abductions has been put forward.
Video is called Missing 411 which is the name of the book.
I include this video due to the supernatural aspect of the disappearances.

jimmer
22nd September 2013, 21:24
moving into the canadian fall/winter, mike has put together a 'greatest hits'
(plus some new audio) compilation that is truly mind boggling. enjoy his ride.

Published on Sep 20, 2013
A recap of the past year showing some of the evidence documented by Sasquatch Ontario.
Prints and vocalizations giving insight into the world of this enigmatic species.

We greatly appreciate all those who've supported us over the last year.
We hope to continue our documentation into the future as this situation progresses.
Contact is on the horizon.

and from a PM:
Glad you like the latest.
I'm slowly opening the door to truth and understanding.
Can't do it all at once as it's too much for most to handle.
It's the same with how we've been shown.
They give us a little at a time likely so as not to overwhelm us.

so, what does mike know about sas that he's still holding onto?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vu4iZC5jq6Y&feature=player_embedded#t=0

:p from this point we begin anew...Bigfoot Vocalizations 2

Frances
22nd September 2013, 22:08
Great professional job with Bigfoot Vocalisations 2 Jimmer. I appreciate the work you have put in to put it all together as I have said before, it's a historical and educational thread.
Frances.

jimmer
29th September 2013, 00:16
I asked mike what his plans were
moving forward into the new season.
lab analysis, write the book, hiatus?

Hi Jimmer,
We'll continue as we are, documenting and hopefully progressing with the interactions.
This is a truly incredible story with much to tell. It's highly controversial,
especially the truth we've uncovered about the true nature of this species.

With trust, this species will allow people to understand what they are and what they're capable of.
It happens one step at a time but is well worth the patience that's needed to gain insight.

The only thing that holds back analysis is money. The audio and hair samples are there, ready and waiting.
This is out of pocket and analysis costs are not cheap. it'll eventually get done.

The only break is the next few weeks as other priorities arise that need to be taken care of.
We'll continue throughout the winter months as we did last year.

Mike

Frances
29th September 2013, 00:29
Glad your maintaining contact Jimmer, we will all stay informed of the new information that this will bring. Between you and Mojo it is "A New Dawn" for me and for others like ourselves.
Frances.

mojo
29th September 2013, 02:39
Thought this was very intriguing as it relates to MIkes statement about seeing orbs and seems plausible and feel ancient aliens did good sharing a bigger connection behind Bigfoot and ET.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8qGkbaLufc

jimmer
29th September 2013, 14:59
the existence of bigfoot is heady enough.
I'm not sure I buy the non-terrestrial connection, but
will watch will an open mind.

mojo
29th September 2013, 16:00
true enough friend, and this is not my hypothesis but the observations and statements made by a few others, and keeping an open mind as well, and to combine two paranormal type events is heady indeed...

Tribe
29th September 2013, 16:39
Haven't had a proper look at this thread for a long time , but I'm glad to see so many contributions being made and I will sit and watch the vids again tonight with a cup of hot chocolate , I love this subject it is one of my favs to peice together and puzzle over ;) x

jimmer
29th September 2013, 19:29
tribe,
if you haven't already visit mike's YT site
when you have an hour or so and take
a walk through his story from the beginning.
it's really fascinating and fun, as all hell
breaks loose.
I did it one rainy day and recommend it to all.
that way, you'll get a good sense of who this
mike guy is.

with all the unsolved or unsolvable mysteries
out there, this one seems to be getting solved
or at least enlightened, one breakthrough at a time.

if mike is not legit, I'll eat my hat (a small one : )

Frances
4th October 2013, 17:36
http://youtu.be/KQD1ICVb7yE


New video from Mike Paterson.
This one shows comparison shots of Sasquatch infant, vocals and the photo of Nephatia behind a large bramble bush.
Frances.

jimmer
5th October 2013, 13:50
getting closer.
getting impatient?
who will blink first?

skywizard
5th October 2013, 17:11
The Sasquatch Genome Project has revealed DNA test results along with several new pictures and videos.

Funded by businessman Adrian Erickson, the five-year $500,000 study has sought to find definitive evidence that an unknown species of hominid is stalking the forests of North America.

In a new reveal this week Dr Melba Ketchum and her team have announced long-awaited DNA test results which appear to indicate that Bigfoot is neither human nor ape but a cross between the two.


http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x15gun2_sasquatch-genome-project-reveals-bigfoot-dna-evidence_news

Read Full Story: http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2013/10/01/sasquatch-genome-project-reveals-bigfoot-photos-in-dallas/



for you Frances ~ peace...
skywizard

mojo
5th October 2013, 20:27
Hoping soon James Gilliland and Jon Kelly will elaborate more on their Bigfoot knowledge & experience. Believe there will be more information revealed from Mike about orbs and Bigfoot. SeeingUFOsPA has more experience with orbs and her statement was revealing when she mentioned she believes they are travel containers and it would explain things like not having more bigfoot evidence if they are multi-dimensional in nature. They seem to have some abilities not spoken of yet

Check out about 12:30 minutes in about Bigfoot.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HVRYcZLbR9o

jimmer
6th October 2013, 14:44
here's another piece of the genome project.
the images are better in this one.
a young quatch can be seen.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8CHAyaHinI

skywizard
6th October 2013, 15:37
Here's another video. I don't know if it's been posted (so many) but here it is again.


'Bigfoot' filmed in remote Canadian woods
This is what was found making knocking and stone clacking sounds. It turns out to be not a bird or other small animal but rather a bipedal hair covered being. It's size, is about 500lbs and about 7 ft tall.


You can read the full story and watch the video (embedding disabled) on you tube source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLJP-zlmXzE



peace...
skywizard

Frances
6th October 2013, 19:41
http://i1287.photobucket.com/albums/a632/nicolaR1/44b8e0ed63dbad59a5f2abf4093cc7f9_zps72129f4b.jpg


Screen shot of Nephatia, Sasquatch. Screen shot taken from Mike Paterson's video.
Sasquatch Watching.
Frances.

jimmer
7th October 2013, 15:29
Here's another video. I don't know if it's been posted (so many) but here it is again.


'Bigfoot' filmed in remote Canadian woods
This is what was found making knocking and stone clacking sounds. It turns out to be not a bird or other small animal but rather a bipedal hair covered being. It's size, is about 500lbs and about 7 ft tall.


You can read the full story and watch the video (embedding disabled) on you tube source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLJP-zlmXzE



peace...
skywizard

what a near hit.
shame his camera skills are pretty shaky.
(who wouldn't be shaky : )
looks to be authentic, to me.
mike is aware of this guy.
he's holding judgement...

Frances
7th October 2013, 15:29
http://i1287.photobucket.com/albums/a632/nicolaR1/5bc2ecb8f912f89b5c728a79e80e2282_zpsa22c3d9e.jpg

I see two things in this photograph.
Left of image on Sasquatch shoulder orb, light and definite shape where the image is distorted.

Right side on image large shiny shape, looks metal?
Symmetry there may have holes in it or they are rain drops.
Looks like a container but I may be wrong.
Frances.

jimmer
7th October 2013, 15:34
here's a back and forth with mike.
his reply was sent today, Oct 7.


Would you discuss?
Hi again Mike,

I returned from a business trip to find your latest video.
Thanks for that.
You seem to be in the 'pocket' with your friends.

A few questions if you don't mind:

- how long have the territorial structures been in place?
the arrangement nearest your tent opening seems to be new.

- can we look forward to a book from you? if so, can you
share how you'll go about producing it and your desired time frame?

- can you talk about your thoughts about gaining the trust?
how would you like nephie to make the next move?
do you sense any impatience?
the forlorn call outs of 'tree,' 'fower,' 'mike' seem like they miss you and want to get closer.

- what can you make of the 'sing sony' nature of their vocalizations?
seems that 'pitch' is part of the communication.
or is it part of their nature -- singing expresses a creative side.

Thanks as always, Mike.
We continue to be with you as events unfold.

jimmer

Re:Would you discuss?
Hey Jimmer,

The structures were being built I think since this summer.
I'd have to look at photos and figure it all out.
They've now made three different structures at the same tree beside my tent,
snapped a small tree on another side of my tent area and
leaned a large tree limb on a third side marking off the area as mine.

Yes I'll be writing. It'll be my winter project although I'm not sure when it'll be ready to publish.
Hopefully not too long.

The trust is gained through our approach and intentions. He trusts us.
We don't push and we don't try to deceive him. They're well aware of everything going on around them.
Trust is key. I'm ready for a face to face. It's all up to Nephatia.
There's not impatience on either side.
It's all good.

He loves repeating "tree" and "flower". They seem to be his favourites.
Maybe he likes the way it rolls off his tongue. Just a guess.

They have rhythm in their speech.
As you can on the latest video, they also seemingly have songs they sing!

Regards
Mike

mojo
7th October 2013, 17:51
Thanks Francis for catching the objects and highlighting it and to Jimmer for keeping in contact with Mike and sharing with us, anything you can ask to help shed light is awesome...

jimmer
7th October 2013, 17:59
the hits just keep on coming...

so, this is what mike meant:

"They have rhythm in their speech.
As you can on the latest video, they also seemingly have songs they sing! "

oh, brother!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXxQ2JSIn4Q

jimmer
7th October 2013, 18:28
Thanks Francis for catching the objects and highlighting it and to Jimmer for keeping in contact with Mike and sharing with us, anything you can ask to help shed light is awesome...

do you have any questions that pop to mind, mojo?

unless it's something mike is keeping close to the vest,
he seems open to queries on the videos, detail around
events and theories on sas's humanity, etc.

I wonder if he knows where they live?

Frances
7th October 2013, 18:59
He knows where the tracks lead to, he said this a long time ago. Others have pressed him on the question of where they sleep but he gives nothing away.
He has a lot of knowledge about them, and has done a good job of keeping their secret.
The book will bring out more things. I will be first there for it.
Frances.

jimmer
7th October 2013, 20:05
I did see that he has followed the tracks,
but I thought he said they disappear
at some point.

the book should be a bestseller.
wonder if he'll include a dvd?
that would require a major publishing house.
will he go for it?

jimmer
8th October 2013, 14:41
Art Bell discovers Mike. (http://artbell.com/sasquatch-sings/)
Most of the comments are negative.
When will Mike talk to Art?

I've let Mike know about the posting.
Wonder what he thinks about Art using
his copyrighted video?

update: mike has responded
to the naysayers at Art's site.
nicely said.

update 2: from mike's post
on Art Bell.com, he spells
his last name, Paterson.
and now we know.

Spiral
8th October 2013, 16:35
He knows where the tracks lead to, he said this a long time ago. Others have pressed him on the question of where they sleep but he gives nothing away.
He has a lot of knowledge about them, and has done a good job of keeping their secret.
The book will bring out more things. I will be first there for it.
Frances.

He is wise to keep silent, there would be hordes of idiots with hunting rifles decend on the place looking for fame & fortune if he did, unfortunately.

I'm really enjoying the work these people do, thanks for posting everyone http://i288.photobucket.com/albums/ll181/moshow1/smilies/cheers.gif (http://media.photobucket.com/user/moshow1/media/smilies/cheers.gif.html)

mojo
9th October 2013, 16:59
I would ask if he knew others have spoken about flashes of light energy and orbs/spheres in association with Bigfoot and if his observations support this? Even the show Ancient Aliens tries to highlight the connection. The ultimate answer from Mike would be if he hypothesizes that bigfoot is a multi-dimensional traveler? Maybe knowing provides a certain comfort that Bigfoot is safe from harm?

jimmer
9th October 2013, 17:11
I would ask if he knew others have spoken about flashes of light energy and orbs/spheres in association with Bigfoot and if his observations support this? Even the show Ancient Aliens tries to highlight the connection. The ultimate answer from Mike would be if he hypothesizes that bigfoot is a multi-dimensional traveler? Maybe knowing provides a certain comfort that Bigfoot is safe from harm?

hey mojo,

in the past, mike has shied away from any hard connection
between sas, orbs and the paranormal. as we've seen, in one of this more
recent video he included shots of orbs around his camp site,
but no theories about any connection. although he continues
to say he 'knows' more than he's revealing.

that said, I'll pass alone your question.
btw: anyone can query mike through his YT page and send
him a PM in the 'About' page. I've read that mike may stop
answering the litany of questions he gets -- takes too much time,
says he.

let's see what he says...

in the meantime, here's a video of some researchers (campers)
discovering orb-like object. ufos, paranormal or both?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8pNUSLXLik

Frances
9th October 2013, 18:08
http://youtu.be/dX6HD9Cgj-0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=%20dX6HD9Cgj-0

Video of the Patterson and Gimlin film.
Analysis done by MK Davis.
MK Davis highlights three things in this video.
The criss cross action of Patty's feet leaving a trench mark in the sand.
The flash of light on the hill side, orb.
The appearance of a second Sasquatch after the orb shows it's self.

In my view an excellent analysis.
Frances.

Frances
9th October 2013, 18:45
Excellent video Jimmer.
Frances.

mojo
9th October 2013, 19:28
The review of the Patterson footage was awesome as well. That flash is very intriguing.

edit: crazy illuminations on the trees and pulsating in the other video. Could it be related to their research?

jimmer
9th October 2013, 21:49
it's funny, when I first watched this Davis analysis,
it didn't really register. now, with mojo's
paranormal/org angle, that video becomes incredible
and riveting. the flash happens, then movement behind the brush.
Davis has good eyes.

as the only quatch researcher that's making big breakthroughs,
mike could be on the cusp of uncovering one of the
great mysteries/myths of our times. go mike.
sure hope he responds to mojo's question.
we'll see...

jimmer
10th October 2013, 16:39
mojo and everyone,
here's mike response to the
'paranormal' question (it was sent in 2 parts):

"While I'm still very hesitant to delve into my personal experiences on a detailed level at this time,
I will tell you that I do have comfort knowing that the sasquatch people are relatively safe from harm.
I believe they can still be harmed but the chances of that happening are extremely slim.

Those who claim to have shot them have never produced anything more than a story.

....and I'll mention that if you listen to any of Ron Morehead's recent interviews,
you'll gain some insight into the truth of this species.
I've spoken with Ron on occasion through email and know him to be fully aware of what they're capable of."

this the most recent ron morehead interview I could find,
from June 2012. The interview begins around the 20 min. mark.
(haven't listened to it yet. let's see what comes up...)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCpV46HSJS0

jimmer
10th October 2013, 17:17
here's a whitley shrieber interview with ron morehead
from march 2013.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkKOqHUUSf8

mojo
11th October 2013, 05:02
Interesting to compare the sounds recorded by Ron in the Rockies vs Mike in Ontario, this Bigfoot is not as deep sounding as Nephatia but some similarities and differences can be noted. His story does corroborate the elusive and fast moving abilities. @42:00 you can hear a deeper sounding bigfoot in the background. Haven't read Ron's book so perhaps there's more info in there but he only hints at a clue of lights in association with Bigfoot.

Frances
11th October 2013, 17:45
Sasquatch Ontario20 hours ago
We've definitely opened up a can of worms here. Realization of this species and their capabilities will bring about an awareness that there is magic in this world.


For me this is proof that they are dealing with interdimensional beings that can disappear into another dimension.
Frances.

jimmer
11th October 2013, 18:18
Sasquatch Ontario20 hours ago
We've definitely opened up a can of worms here. Realization of this species and their capabilities will bring about an awareness that there is magic in this world.


For me this is proof that they are dealing with interdimensional beings that can disappear into another dimension.
Frances.

it's getting curioser and curioser.
mike's got to have his sh*t together
to handle all of this so well.

mojo
12th October 2013, 16:28
Linda Moulton Howe shares a bigfoot/ET connection about 19 minutes in...a bigfoot is observed descending down from a silver disk....


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xn76ayab3f0








ET connection about 19 minutes in

jimmer
16th October 2013, 17:18
I was curious to see if ArtBell.com was
on to mike, so I contacted paul bowman,
Art's program producer:

Hi Paul,

Any idea when, if Art will interview
Mike Paterson of 'Sasquatch Sings'
and Sasquatch Ontario?

That should be one exciting time.

Mike has been done a couple of web radio interviews,
but the chance to talk with Art would be really interesting.
Match that with Mike's trove of bigfoot audio and you
have a 'must listen event' for sure.

Controversial? Sure, but since followed Mike's progress
for a year, I can say he's the real deal. A real breakthrough.

Thanks for your consideration. Jimmer

paul's reply:

Bigfoot Audio?

Do you happen to have any contact info for Mr. Peterson?
A web site, facebook, twitter or best of all, Email.

Thanks!!

Paul

my reply:

paul, if you haven't had the chance, check out his YT site.
his videos contain the most spectacular sasquatch audio
to-date. here's his YT page that has the 'send message' button.
he's very good on replying. he's told me he'd be honored to talk
with Art. Big fan.

http://www.youtube.com/user/MANASOOCAN/about

if you can, let me know what you think about his research/videos.
to me, he's in the process of cracking the 'nut.'

jimmer

paul's reply:

Hi Jim,
I'll check it out this evening..
Art's been looking for some good bigfoot
material so... Maybe this is it!
Thanks!
Paul

my reply:

you and Art will be blown away.

at one point (rainy day) I walked through
all his videos, from the beginning to the most
recent. what a trip. this guy is authentic and is
on to one of the biggest breakthroughs, bar none.

have fun having your minds blown : )

paul's reply:

Can you fill me in a little like where
are most of the videos from?
Location wise?
Canada, Pacific Northwest or? etc...

my reply:

paul,
some of the early videos
are from a different part of ontario, canada.
later, mike was introduced to a husband and wife
who own a remote ontario cottage and land that is
habituated with a family of sasquatch.
mike refers to the husband as 'the home owner,'
keeping his identity private.
so, for a year or so, mike and the homeowner
have been habituating and making incredible
contact. no guns. no tricks. lots of trust and familiarity.
and lots of results.

all hell began to break loose May of this year…

jimmer

it's funny, mike's latest 'sasquatch sings' video
is on the Bell site. considering paul's questions,
he must not have snagged it.

this could be interesting. stay tuned...

Frances
16th October 2013, 18:02
Great stuff Jimmer, looking forward to the outcome of your communications.
Hope Mike has a video for us soon.
Frances.

jimmer
16th October 2013, 20:19
I don't want to come off as a groupie or anything, : /
but mike will be doing more web radio interviews
(this reply came after informing him of the art bell inquiry):

Message:
Thanks Jimmer.

FYI, I'll be doing another blog radio interview this coming Monday at 8pm EST. with Mark Johnson.

Another one after that coming up on Nov. 26th with Bill Lee on Inspired By Bigfoot.


here's the correct link to the mark johnson show on 'unknown origins radio.' (http://www.unknownoriginsradio.com) *

* mike took a look at our thread and corrected me with the correct link.

mojo
18th October 2013, 06:32
Neat to here others making claims of even deeper paranormal connections.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CNhX4qwlM4

mojo
18th October 2013, 06:37
and one more..


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yfugsyFhlY8

Frances
18th October 2013, 14:46
I found video No 2 and the gentleman very interesting Mojo so I am going to look up more of his work.
It is the first time I have heard any of his work.
Frances.

jimmer
18th October 2013, 16:02
recent mike video update:


Sasquatch Ontario 12 hours ago
FYI, I'll be doing an interview this coming monday Oct. 21st at 8pm EST on Unknown Origins Radio with Mark Johnson.
We'll also be putting out a cool piece of audio shortly. I'll start working on another one and should have it up within hopefully a few days.

mojo
18th October 2013, 18:27
Enjoyed listening to Joe Kiernan's R.O.A.M. (Researchers on a mission) program and his latest one he had a researcher from the Pine Bush/Hudson Valley sharing named Al Santariga with an amazing discussion of ET contacts and Bigfoot expeditions. In one example he shares, "Once after spotting a Bigfoot the next thing I see is a UFO." And not many researchers can say they shared a triad of paranormal encounters, Bigfoot, ET and Ghosts. It's exciting to see all the possibilities of a connection but in the beginning of the thread (first one) never made a connection myself. It was in the thread where someone mentioned Orbs that Mike seen that got the ball rolling and now see there are others that feel there's something special as part of the encounters. Maybe proof is not far off? I might be jumping the gun in Mikes encounters but he left a cliff hanger and has kept mostly quiet about it.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZutafTu9yrk

mojo
19th October 2013, 18:47
more connections popping up...
edit: no need to watch the entire program the bigfoot part is the first segment

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-CeJWIlg2c

jimmer
21st October 2013, 20:34
it's official -- tonight.
or archive tomorrow ; )


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7TCA5OM7XBg

jimmer
22nd October 2013, 17:20
here's mike's latest interview. (http://unknownoriginsradio.podomatic.com/entry/2013-10-21T18_22_28-07_00)

let''s see what happening...

jimmer
22nd October 2013, 18:36
big take aways (spoilers):

- mike's childhood encounter

- his purported 'infrasound' experience

- sasquatch drops the F-bomb
(mike had mentioned this audio, but
kept it off his YT site)

- newly released audio

- comments of 'sasquatch watching' video:
2:55 - image 'start of trackway' shows
footprint that begin and end abruptly. right
footprint is dirty -- in the middle of pristine,
clean snow. highly strange...

- largest listening audience in the history
of the radio show

best mike interview yet.

Frances
22nd October 2013, 19:03
It was a great interview and we know that for as long as Mike is allowed to do research we will get amazing information.
We have to read In between the lines with the inter dimensional aspect of these encounters but we've had good grounding and we can do it.
I think he was chosen as a young lad to be the one to bring out this information.
Not that I know who by.
Frances.

jimmer
22nd October 2013, 19:25
it was a good one, for sure, frances.
after the audio clips begin, it interesting to listen to the startled
interviewer's tone of voice contrasted to mike's giggly replies.
this is the time of his life.

did you catch mike's work industry?

banking.

can you imagine the talk around the
water cooler?

jimmer
23rd October 2013, 13:34
here's mike's reply to a PM
on the interview:


Thanks Jimmer,
I fully appreciate all the support.
Glad you enjoyed it. I felt much better getting some of the strangeness out in the open.
Close sasquatch activity is riddled with it. You can only skate around it for so long.
It's difficult to hold it in and it's both difficult to let it out.

I wasn't keen on the tampering with the audio either. Oh well. It's done.
I've taken the audio to that stage of trying to remove background noise,
coming out with the same result and I didn't like it.
I'm sure there's someone who could clean it up much better at some point.

Yes, the F bomb was cut out of the video. know folks listen with their kids.
I don't want to set a bad example. I thought an interview though would be a good
venue to play the entire piece though.

I was at home. The interview was conducted through Skype which works very well.
I've done a couple of them that way.

All in all I felt better for having opened up a bit. There's much more going on
but I didn't want to delve too much into the strange aspect as one has to be
careful how to convey that information. It's difficult enough with the amount of ridicule,
name calling, being labelled a hoaxer, etc. All in good time.

Mike

jimmer
29th October 2013, 14:38
mike's latest, posted october 28.
the conversation.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hL7r13n8Kng

jimmer
31st October 2013, 14:52
as short as the final audio
'conversation' is, has it struck
anyone how strange and almost
mechanical the high pitched voice
sounds? almost like a broken
speaker cone. very odd.
mike seems to be on the verge
of something big…again.

Frances
31st October 2013, 17:54
I was thinking it sounded like a guitar the tone is vibrational and has a melody to it.
Now I think it could be mechanical.
I don't know.
Wish Church will hear it as he could throw some light on the frequency of the female voice.
Frances.

Spiral
31st October 2013, 19:04
The guys courage is incredible, most people would be terrified, like the chap in the "Skunk Ape" vid, and he was armed !

jimmer
31st October 2013, 21:27
The guys courage is incredible, most people would be terrified, like the chap in the "Skunk Ape" vid, and he was armed !

I was dubious when I first watched that
skunk ape vid, but I read up to find
the guy seemed legit. I too would
have freaked and run. mike?
he's into something so meaningful
to him, it's beyond fright and into wonderment.
I bet he's into the writing process now.
my curiosity is peaking. think about being
on the cusp of uncovering one of largest mysteries of
our age. the responsibility, the awe, the fun.


this afternoon, mike replied to a 2 month old post
to one of his Jan. 2012 videos. better late than never : /
amongst other things, he confirmed that a dvd will
be in the offing. that plus a book of revelations would be choice.

jimmer
20th December 2013, 20:24
OK, with the new server fix, we've lost content, again.

here are the lost videos, for those who haven't seen them, yet.

pretty historic stuff...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFZBHwm0sxU


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-iCEISoXBQ

jimmer
20th December 2013, 20:41
I'm not sure if this is supposed to be funny or not.

take a look if you are a sas fan and see what you think.

a bit stiff for me, but I'm not everyone.

the opening is pretty cool, though...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtCE9brVn2M

Frances
20th December 2013, 23:00
I watched part of Speaking of Sasquatch 1.
I tried to connect with it, I have the same trouble trying with video 2.
I am not saying it is false information I just don't connect with channelled information.
It may be my loss, I don't know.
Frances.

jimmer
21st December 2013, 13:05
I watched part of Speaking of Sasquatch 1.
I tried to connect with it, I have the same trouble trying with video 2.
I am not saying it is false information I just don't connect with channelled information.
It may be my loss, I don't know.
Frances.

the video comes off like a Saturday Night Live skit.
come to think of it, they could have a field day with this.
so brittle, so over the top, so dogmatic.
the only person who comes off as someone to listen to
is the spokeswoman for the habituation couple.
the rest seem funny and troubled to me.

Frances
23rd December 2013, 00:44
I have tried again with the message of Kathleen Odam. I am left with the feeling she has no real reason to be speaking other than she wants to influence others with her own ego.
I think she is not of true heart.
Frances.

Spiral
23rd December 2013, 08:21
I have tried again with the message of Kathleen Odam. I am left with the feeling she has no real reason to be speaking other than she wants to influence others with her own ego.
I think she is not of true heart.
Frances.

I think she is false too, she uses too many expressions & turns of phrases that are very human, and very popular with certain channellers.

Its either her ego or an entity of the kind that calls its self St Germain.

jimmer
25th December 2013, 22:17
merry christmas from mike paterson
and sasquatch ontario.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbDr8vQHF6I

monk
25th December 2013, 22:23
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/the-one-people-oneness-radio/2013/12/04/the-long-conversation-0405-dec-2013

My apologies if this thread is for only 5 senses evidence material but I found this interview very interesting, made more of a believer out of me than any footage ever could! Hope you enjoy it I did.

Frances
26th December 2013, 13:58
I have listened to the interview and I enjoyed it. There is much there that ties in with what Mike Paterson is communicating.
There is a warmth, love and heart in the words spoken which invite the listener to engage rather than be put off.
Please post more Monk.

On two occasions Jimmer's thread has reached over 2,600 views, on two occasions a lot of data has been lost in cyber land.
Jimmer has posted some of the lost videos but others that build on the picture of Sasquatch are lost also.
Good to have more input.
Frances.


There is a lot of intrest in this thread.

jimmer
26th December 2013, 19:07
hey monk and thanks for contributing.
the more input, opinions and content on
this subject, the better.

thank goodness the interview with the two sasquatch
guys was more interesting than first 30 or so minutes.
the first guy was a ball of confusion.
wish the good part didn't end up ripping into politics.
this is a 'no politics zone,' unless politics messes with
mike, sasquatch and such.

let the rest of the world burn : )

mojo
27th December 2013, 03:05
in the video 'when fringe meets fact' at the end it appears notice the light reflecting off the side of the doorway. That was neat to see the energy from the orb cause that reflection...

jimmer
27th December 2013, 10:57
in the video 'when fringe meets fact' at the end it appears notice the light reflecting off the side of the doorway. That was neat to see the energy from the orb cause that reflection...

mojo, are you talking about that secondary, pin light appearing to the left after the first large orb takes off?
I reviewed it and not sure I see the 'reflection' you're talking about.

mojo
27th December 2013, 16:54
hi, its on the right side at 11:08. I missed it the first time and then spotted it...;)

jimmer
27th December 2013, 18:34
hi, its on the right side at 11:08. I missed it the first time and then spotted it...;)

I just noticed it, mojo.
but listen closely -- it's mike exhaling ; )
it took me a couple of plays to hear and see it.

jimmer
27th December 2013, 20:17
m. k. davis discovers something fantastic in a cave.
is this discovery sasquatch related? not sure, but it sure is fascinating.

m. k. must have been involved in some sort
of forensic work.

plus, a revisit to the cave that surprises...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yG-kLpC2ED4


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAVslqPnlG8&feature=c4-overview&list=UUu9zhQZHPYzWhmWs9eFXX_g

mojo
27th December 2013, 20:20
good call Jimmer, it was the moisture from the breath that was illuminated..

jimmer
30th December 2013, 22:03
until mike releases another mind blowing video,
here's m.k. davis' analysis of a possible sasquatch 'infrasound' capture.
could it be?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srwNUgcTKr8

jimmer
30th December 2013, 22:20
one more m.k. video analysis: night runner.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfCsk-jE_Es

Frances
30th December 2013, 23:31
I love the work and analysis of M.K. Davis .
I will check the thread to see if the video of his is still there.
It's the one showing the dimensional jump on the Patterson and Gimlin film.
I will re post it if it is gone.
Frances.

Frances
31st December 2013, 14:55
http://youtu.be/dX6HD9Cgj-0

M.K. Davis discusses a possible second Sasquatch in the Patterson and Gimlin film.
I have taken a Leap of Faith and believe I am seeing a dimensional jump of the second Sasquatch into this dimension.
The jump appears after the flash of light.
Frances.


Video 21 mins worth watching all of it.

Frances
31st December 2013, 15:09
[IMG]http://i1287.photobucket.com/albums/a632/nicolaR1/bb0ea74a01e1562b44ecde43ad76bd1a_zpsafd2d3c7.jpg

One of my favourites.
Screen shot taken from One of Mike Paterson's videos.
Showing an orb/light on the left side of the Sasquatch's arm.
Frances.

jimmer
31st December 2013, 16:50
M.K. Davis discusses a possible second Sasquatch in the Patterson and Gimlin film.
I have taken a Leap of Faith and believe I am seeing a dimensional jump of the second Sasquatch into this dimension.
The jump appears after the flash of light.
Frances.


Video 21 mins worth watching all of it.

m.k. is a monster.
talk about 'good eyes.'
the orb is really interesting.
so brief, but it's there.
looks like what mike has been recently documenting.

kind of a leap of faith 'seeing' the second sasquatch,
but with m.k.'s credibility, you've got to consider it.
and how about that creaking desk chair.
one of his quaint signatures : )

can you imagine spending +15 years analyzing +20 sec.
of footage without any compensation?
now that's dedication.

Frances
1st January 2014, 09:20
Just had a laugh, I realised the thing that is creaking is the chair.
I thought it was his bird!
My brain can be slow at times. ('~')
Frances.

jimmer
1st January 2014, 14:35
btw: I noticed a while back and confirmed today that one of mike's video has been removed
from his YT channel. It's the one that first presents the name Nephatia and first featured
selfies, including this blue eye shot.
wonder why? looked around google and it's just gone.

I'll send him a PM and we'll see what happens...

from his original post:

Audio from August second.
Insane activity at the gift tree outside my tent as well as
what we believe to be verification of a name, which we've been asking for months.


http://bigfootblogger.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/nephatia.jpg

jimmer
1st January 2014, 16:41
here's an interesting investigative tale of a creature
sighting and the burgeoning legend near new orleans, louisiana back in the '60s.
in 2003, two researchers, including the one and only 'marlon keith davis,' (m.k. to us),
wanted to get to the bottom of this tale.
and as you'll see, they really did.
chalk up another one to m.k.

here's the original video of this creature.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtXzA3oeypo

the 70s 'In Search of...' (lots of background setup, but the entire concept of bigfoot was new back then)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SN-aKenyMAE

here's the investigation and discovery.
(for the life of me, I can't figure why the this video carries this title, as you'll see.)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suXgGxSFxg8

here's the film that m.k. believes may have inspired this
mystery, as well as mainstreaming the bigfoot legend. 70s chic ; )
feel free to save this one for a rainy day or after you've sorted your sock drawer...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h377bm8bolw

Spiral
1st January 2014, 17:46
btw: I noticed a while back and confirmed today that one of mike's video has been removed
from his YT channel. It's the one that first presents the name Nephatia and first featured
selfies, including this blue eye shot.
wonder why? looked around google and it's just gone.

I'll send him a PM and we'll see what happens...

from his original post:

Audio from August second.
Insane activity at the gift tree outside my tent as well as
what we believe to be verification of a name, which we've been asking for months.




Don't mean to go off topic but;

Yet more proof that when you see a really ground breaking yt its a good idea to download it !

Free down loader for firefox here https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1-click-youtube-video-download/?src=ss

(Download as mp4 or may not play/ burn to disc etc)

You can also put videos on a memory stick, new TVs have a USB socket & you can plug the stick in & watch videos, much easier & quicker than burning to DVD, (I prefer to watch longer yt vids like that, its much better :popc: )

jimmer
1st January 2014, 18:33
did it and have it.
just wish foxfire was my primary browser.
invested in safari, but at least I now
have an option. mucho thanks.

digging your title morphing, spiral.
keeping it fresh.

Frances
1st January 2014, 19:09
Looking forward to these videos tonight Jimmer. I will watch them when I get my grandson sorted for bed.
Frances.

jimmer
3rd January 2014, 16:43
btw: I noticed a while back and confirmed today that one of mike's video has been removed
from his YT channel. It's the one that first presents the name Nephatia and first featured
selfies, including this blue eye shot.
wonder why? looked around google and it's just gone.

I'll send him a PM and we'll see what happens...

from his original post:

Audio from August second.
Insane activity at the gift tree outside my tent as well as
what we believe to be verification of a name, which we've been asking for months.


http://bigfootblogger.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/nephatia.jpg

mystery solved:

Re:Removed video?
I was cleaning up some of the half loads that were still sitting there and deleted the wrong one.

I still have the original and will put it up again at some point.

jimmer
7th January 2014, 23:21
one word: NYEDAWHO
listen to the joy.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iC3CNvpA0kA

modwiz
8th January 2014, 00:09
Is there enough material for an album yet? CD? MP3 compilation? :ok:

Frances
8th January 2014, 00:12
Loving this one, notice the melted snow under the marble. That is the heat off the Sasquatch's hand which has heated the marble up.
It was not placed there when it was in its cold frigid state.
Frances.

jimmer
8th January 2014, 12:17
does the :16 'footprint' look 'stamped'?
doesn't look like an actual foot print to me.
looks like a curled palm print with simulated
'toes imprints'. as if it's a glyph.
same at :44.
same at 1:18.
in the past, several car surface hand prints have
looked to be drawn with finger swipes.
not sure what to make of this.

Frances
8th January 2014, 14:12
Don't know what to think, I would not have thought about it until you pointed it out.
Do you suspect some skullduggery Jimmer?
Frances.

jimmer
8th January 2014, 14:39
Don't know what to think, I would not have thought about it until you pointed it out.
Do you suspect some skullduggery Jimmer?
Frances.

not sure, frances.
I've challenged mike on some of those
car hand prints and later he agreed they
were 'illustrations' by nephie.
I can buy that.
as for these new 'prints,'
let's see what mike says about that.
for now, I chaulk it up to an apparent enthusiasm,
rather than a researcher's objectivity.

that said, if I were in his shoes, my mind
would be ragging, mangled by now.
as mike has said, he's over his head.

Frances
10th January 2014, 12:43
http://youtu.be/g6Q_2xGg29Y

Posted on Mike's site today.
So we have another interview to look forward to.
He said he has some new information to speak about.
Frances.

jimmer
10th January 2014, 13:03
good eyes, frances.
will you post the archive link when it's available?

Frances
10th January 2014, 13:12
I hope too, I will watch out for it when it becomes available.
Looking forward to it myself.
Frances.

jimmer
10th January 2014, 17:52
from mike's latest YT comments about the upcoming interview:

"Yes Dave. There's some very interesting update that I'll talk about. It'll add more lunacy to the whole situation :)"

bring-it-on.

mojo
10th January 2014, 19:25
not sure, frances.
I've challenged mike on some of those
car hand prints and later he agreed they
were 'illustrations' by nephie.

your response surprised me a little and surprised that Mike did not point out it was an illustration .. not sure that helped the case imho...

The hair samples will be definitive proof and hope to hear about the ones he collected, (that science should be out by now) but with all the other evidence I can't imagine it being other than authentic. I might be more trusting than most as Mike had me believing just on audio vocalizations which seemed past the range of human ability.

simple errors in judgement are sure to happen just by working through a discovery like bigfoot so there is grace given...

Frances
10th January 2014, 19:52
http://i1287.photobucket.com/albums/a632/nicolaR1/3794996a0dcc01be703d4bf7d12a4b00_zpsdba11d64.jpg

It was pointed out to me by a friend that Mike uses a Rune for his glyph.
It is an Algiz Reversed.
This is a screen shot of it.

I will post link to view the rest of the Runes.
Frances.

Frances
10th January 2014, 19:57
http://davensjournal.com/runeinfo.html

This is the link to view, Runes and their meanings.
Frances.

I know nothing of The Runes.
The above link and meaning is for beginners. Shown as an example.
People with greater knowledge of this subject may see a different meaning.

Frances
10th January 2014, 22:19
http://runesecrets.com/rune-meanings/algiz-rune-meaning-analysis

Here is a more detailed link regarding the meaning and spiritual aspect of The Runes.
This link is more informative.
It covers some aspects of the things we see in the videos, not just the physical aspects.
Frances.

jimmer
10th January 2014, 22:19
your response surprised me a little and surprised that Mike did not point out it was an illustration .. not sure that helped the case imho...

The hair samples will be definitive proof and hope to hear about the ones he collected, (that science should be out by now) but with all the other evidence I can't imagine it being other than authentic. I might be more trusting than most as Mike had me believing just on audio vocalizations which seemed past the range of human ability.

simple errors in judgement are sure to happen just by working through a discovery like bigfoot so there is grace given...

I hope and want to believe you are right, mojo.
I was skunking around the comments of his latest video and mike mentioned
that he thought hair analysis won't be much help as far as authenticity goes.
he attributed to their mysticism or something.
as you, I watch with amazement (while measuring...)

more on the 'young prints':
mike admits that he should not have said that the
print were not 'stamped' (illustrated), but later in the comments
he talks about the young one attributed to the new prints.
that said, mike has made it clear that there was no track way,
only one-offs. hight strangeness, indeed.
real prints or illustrations? outside objectivity may assist mike
as he visits his wonderland.

jimmer
10th January 2014, 22:23
It was pointed out to me by a friend that Mike uses a Rune for his glyph.
It is an Algiz Reversed.
This is a screen shot of it.

I will post link to view the rest of the Runes.
Frances.

well, now that's interesting.
the algiz reversed symbolizes something not to be trusted and in distress.

what's your take, frances?
just a quirk or something else?

Drawing ALGIZ REVERSED shows a time when you are vulnerable. You may have to sacrifice something with no gain. Someone may be deceiving or misleading you. Be on guard for trouble from any direction. ALGIZ REVERSED tells that there is someone you should avoid, or perhaps an offer that you should refuse. Someone may be using you. Consult the surrounding runes for a clearer indication of this. Beware of new "friends", someone will try and use you. It is possible that you are deceiving yourself, don't expect something for nothing. If you are behaving with greed or are being naive, someone is sure to try and con you. In questions regarding love, delay a new relationship until more is known about their character and motives.

modwiz
10th January 2014, 23:21
One of my problems with the "peace" sign, is its weak use of the algiz or eolh rune. I love the algiz rune. It is a personal favorite of mine to employ. Used in its proper upright position, arms receiving the blessings of heaven and bringing them to earth. Its most potent universally benefic use, IMO. It is also a very potent protective rune when it is seen as antlers. Another way of viewing the rune and its purpose(s).

The "Peace Movement" was doomed by the irresponsible casting of this rune. I intuit that this was no 'accident'. There are clear psyop penetrations, if not the generation, of the movement. Implanting a weak rune to have millions pour energy into by displaying and writing is black magic used to weaken an esoterically ignorant enemy.

Only a few people I have spoken to about this have ever taken me seriously.

Hmm. May be time to write a song about this.:scrhd:

mojo
11th January 2014, 00:06
that he thought hair analysis won't be much help as far as authenticity goes.

sending hair samples for DNA analysis would be on top of my list...

Frances
11th January 2014, 13:06
The fact that Mike uses The Rune Algiz as his glyph, may have come from an image that was planted in his head by Sasquatch we don't know of course if this is the case.
It is evident that protection is needed as Nephatia has placed his own markers ie the stick structure's around Mike's tent area as protection and so far he has been protected.

I think back to the incident when there was growling and snarling going on between Sasquatch clan members outside his tent.
Mike lay in his tent terrified, unable to move for over an hour.
He did not come out until day break.
Mike said it was sibling rivalry over sandwiches but due to the terror he was unable to see.
It may have been something else.
Frances.

jimmer
11th January 2014, 13:52
one thing is for sure, this entire story is provocative, fantastic and worth our attention.
as for the reverse rune, wonder if that should be posed to mike?
think he would be conversational or punitive?
following this from the beginning, I can't recall how the rune glyph first came about.

jimmer
11th January 2014, 15:42
here' the 1.11.14 interview.
let's see what mike has to say. (http://www.blogtalkradio.com/kdclmedia/2014/01/11/spooky-radio-360-welcomes-sasquatch-ontario)

sorry I beat you to the punch, frances.
I happened to be online and noticed
that the interview had begun : )

first reference I could find to the reverse rune glyph
created by, presented by sas or mike? not sure.

http://youtu.be/QaoX2ZeVE4A?t=31s

upon further review, mike created the glyph.

http://youtu.be/QaoX2ZeVE4A?t=6m34s

first time sas returns the favor and draws the glyph.

http://youtu.be/5e8kci3De6k?t=4m59s

at this point, I chalk up this reverse rune glyph,
it's meaning and mike's use of it as a pure coincidence,
without mike signaling some deeper meaning.
what say you?

Frances
11th January 2014, 22:58
Thanks for posting Jimmer, once again I enjoyed this interview. Mike sounded very happy , confident and assertive.
He talked about the dimensional door ways and the dimensional aspect of Sasquatch with great confidence.

He is right that this movement has reached the point of no return. No amount of disinformation can turn this around.
Going from strength to strength.

I still think there was an infiltrater in the camp that night that caused the growling and snarling.
Frances.

jimmer
12th January 2014, 14:10
I can sense that there'll be mounting pressure on mike
to provide something concrete to support his story and audio.
something. hair analysis. a clear photo. video, a corroborating third-party witness.
for his sake, hope that happens this year.
we all want to believe, first with our hearts, then our heads.
once things evolved into the fantastic (invisibility, portals, orbs, inter-dimensions),
the desires for hard evidence begin to build.
how about this:
back when 'hand glyphs' were being left of his vehicle, mimicking mike's hand prints,
I suggested that he put his face print on a window, prompting his friend to follow.
a face imprint would be something physical to hold on to.
what else would work?

mojo
12th January 2014, 19:31
what is the opinion of bigfoots intelligence? Is there anything we can learn listening to the interaction with Mike and Nephatia?

jimmer
12th January 2014, 21:07
what is the opinion of bigfoots intelligence? Is there anything we can learn listening to the interaction with Mike and Nephatia?

that, mojo, is a great line of inquiry.

my personal take so far, with leap of faith in tow, is that while mike's family must have 'intelligence',
their existence and perseverance must be based more on an intuitiveness, instinct and a youthful curiosity.
most of the 'bigfoot scary' stories seems to be one-offs. someone enters the domain and is scared
into-next-sunday and don't return, never forgetting the event. always with a great story.
all the habituators that I've read or learned about have had their scared sh*tless moment, but they
returned or didn't leave. if seems that once the fear quotient is passed, sas begins to accept and investigate.
using their intuitiveness and curiosity to size up their visitors, they begin to feel at ease, eventually
finding a common ground, trust and a desire to share. this is if the contact begins early in their development.
if a sas grows and matures without habitual contact, the idea of sharing would be distant. in mike's case,
his contact with a young male is allowing his family and elders to accept mike's interaction and curiosity.
nephatia has punched mike's ticket and he's now on the ride of his life.

although, none of this begins to deal with the areas of inter-dimensionality or mysticism mike is running into.

perhaps they reside in a netherworld, dream-like state --
between worlds, dimensions.
a realm they don't even understand.
surviving and thriving without a deeper context.

on one of mike's latest vocal interactions, well into the give and take, nephatia repeats mike's
word, then groans -- sounding frustrated at the lack of real communication
(again at 4:59). they're on the same ride of a lifetime.
http://youtu.be/QbDr8vQHF6I?t=3m58s

Frances
12th January 2014, 22:35
My own take on the interaction between Nephatia and Mike is for me too early to tell. Mike keeps saying they are highly intelligent but he keeps so much to himself at the moment that we don't allways get the full picture.
Naturaly he is keeping information back so he can have material for his book.

For me the book will give us more than we dare hope for.
So I am going to wait for it.
Frances.

Frances
12th January 2014, 22:41
I also agree with Jimmer's take on this and I now believe The Rune to be significant to Sasquatch and Mike.
I believe Mike has had to pass some kind of test of courage and trust to be where he is today.

The cottage owner may have his own stories to tell, I hope they are in the book.
Frances.

modwiz
13th January 2014, 00:06
here' the 1.11.14 interview.
let's see what mike has to say. (http://www.blogtalkradio.com/kdclmedia/2014/01/11/spooky-radio-360-welcomes-sasquatch-ontario)

sorry I beat you to the punch, frances.
I happened to be online and noticed
that the interview had begun : )

first reference to could find to the reverse rune glyph
created by, presented by sas or mike? not sure.

http://youtu.be/QaoX2ZeVE4A?t=31s

upon further review, mike created the glyph.

http://youtu.be/QaoX2ZeVE4A?t=6m34s

first time sas returns the favor and draws the glyph.

http://youtu.be/5e8kci3De6k?t=4m59s

at this point, I chalk up this reverse rune glyph,
it's meaning and mike's use of it as a pure coincidence,
without mike signaling some deeper meaning.
what say you?

Based on the videos offered, it is likely Mike has no working knowledge of the runes. Calling a rune a glyph is where the basis of my opinion is formed.

modwiz
13th January 2014, 00:08
I also agree with Jimmer's take on this and I now believe The Rune to be significant to Sasquatch and Mike.
I believe Mike has had to pass some kind of test of courage and trust to be where he is today.

The cottage owner may have his own stories to tell, I hope they are in the book.
Frances.

Mimicry is a form of communication. A smiley face would work as well as a glyph. :)

Although a smile from our species can also bode ill.

samos
14th January 2014, 03:19
Hello Jimmer, Modwiz, Frances, Mojo and any others I might have missed. It's great to finally become a member and share some thoughts. I enjoy reading all of your comments about Mike and Sasquatch Ontario and am a big fan. I just finished listening to latest interview and was interested to hear about the other "creature" captured in a photo. The different teeth marks (revealing possible sharper teeth), is another revelation in this story worth further investigation. Mike and I do PM on a semi-regular basis, and no doubt I will be asking him for more info.

Jimmer...yes, I spoke to Mike about the glyph. Other than finding it interesting, he found no connection. I find myself asking what is it that does NOT ring true about it? The answer is nothing...it reads like a book, as if it is the very thing that is going on up there. I believe the reversed Algiz rune is dangerous...or let's just say a symbol of dangerous activity.

Modwiz....that was great to read your comment on the Peace sign and its demise...I had never given it any thought, but must agree wholeheartedly !

Frances.... :) Thank you for helping me get on board. I look forward to talking with you, and sharing more of what we have learned.

Mojo....Yes, hair analysis would be my top order. I, too, was convinced of authenticity from audio, alone. The "departing vocal" is still my favorite. It could never be duplicated by a human.

I'll get my profile in order soon, I just wanted to say a quick "Hello" to you all.

Tahnk Youuuu!......Samos

mojo
14th January 2014, 04:08
welcome samos and it's a pleasure to have you on board...:)

Frances
14th January 2014, 10:15
Hello Samos, great your here. We all look forward to your input and opinions it gives balance and discussion to this unique thread.
Frances.

jimmer
14th January 2014, 12:21
samos,
great to have you, a fellow enthusiast, on this incredible ride.
once we individually come to grips with mike's story, his authenticity
and believability, his exploits really take hold.
we all come to TOT for different reasons, but a common
bond is the search for information and understanding
of the fantastic. we can be hard on evidence and one another
as these searches progress, but it's all in good fun.
the puzzles have been skewed and we're here to sort it out.

question for you: talk a bit more about your statement:

"I believe the reversed Algiz rune is dangerous...or let's just say a symbol of dangerous activity."

in what way, dangerous activity? on whose part?
mike's innocent coincidental usage or deeper meaning?

together, we'll figure it all out or at least have fun trying : )

jimmer
14th January 2014, 22:05
can you sense mike's growing frustration?

from his latest YT post:

Sasquatch Ontario1 hour ago

+moondowg1 Thanks. There's a handful out there who are also involved in their own work
who would like nothing more than to see this knocked down and out. Alex Munoz (Midnight Walker) is one.
He's an ignorant sob who props himself up as some know it all yet his audio is crap and he has nothing to back up his claims.
He's a wannabe. He's the first person who interviewed me on this subject after the major swamp print find in 2012.
Since we started getting the really good stuff, he turned on this. Same with Matthew Johnson.
He's another one who consistently lambastes this as a hoax. Again he's another one who's doing the same sort of work
but getting very minimal results. His audio is entirely ambiguous with him claiming that Scott Nelson says it's definitely bigfoot speech.
I question Nelson's credentials and conclusions big time. Agendas. This subject is full of animosity and agendas, back stabbers, hatred and jealousy.
Munoz and Johnson are perfect examples. They go to the degree of putting up videos to knock this and full pages on their website comparing this and calling it a hoax.
If this were a hoax they'd have recreated the audio and shown exactly how it was done. They know they can't and it drives them crazy.
They rant and stomp their feet. The politics in this subject is pathetic. I don't attack others, that's not my style.
I will however stand up and defend myself against these assholes. I have no respect for these people.
I'm sure we haven't seen the end of their whining and childish antics. 

Frances
14th January 2014, 22:24
I think he is getting extra attacks since the disclosure of the dimensional aspect of Sasquatch and the disclosure of the dimensional doorways that they have seen in the forest.
It's been taken to another level and there may be lots of people who will call hoax.
He must be exhausted constantly defending himself.
Frances.

modwiz
14th January 2014, 23:51
OMG, Bigfoot wars. Well actually ego wars.

Dysfunction, the bane of mankind.

Bigfoot better watch out if this is the behavior around this research. Competition has no place here.

samos
15th January 2014, 02:32
Hello Jimmer, Thanks and I appreciate the opportunity to share my thoughts. I knew this would be a great place to find people who are looking at this subject with serious, analytical type approach on this great journey of discovery. That being said, I’m certainly no expert…just enjoying the ride

I do not doubt Mike’s experiences and have learned not to dismiss any idea, without giving it some thought and research. The connections and similarities out there are astounding, giving these experiences much credibility.

From what I have found about Runes (which is recent), is that many are used in the art of Divination. The Algiz rune (from Eldrfuthark), of Norse Mythology, represents a channeling of non human, spiritual, sentient beings. It’s “Antenna” or “Antlers” pointed to the Heavens and other realms. In reverse (inverted), as Mike uses it, the uses are for accessing the realm of the dead, giants and the unconscious. At least part of that sounds familiar, right? Other “signs” of this rune include courage and strength, higher spiritual awareness, and the protective teaching force (meaning, the power a Mentor would transfer to students or seekers, possibly in the form of divine guidance).

I do believe Mike had no precognition of using this Rune, but perhaps had a little “mental” influence. He had written me in the past about having contact with another “sentient being”, prior to this Sasquatch activity. In some way, he believes this has led him to where he is today. I’d have to agree.

Mike is genuine, a gentleman, and the real deal. His word is good with me…whether I agree with his conclusions or not, he is telling it like it is.

Thank you all for the warm welcome…..samos

jimmer
15th January 2014, 12:42
one thing's for sure, this story is one of the most provocative we've ever found.
an honest man finds himself in the middle of utmost controversy, wading through
incredible discoveries that challenge the intellect and belief system.

of all the subjects we investigate here at TOT, mike's story may be one of the most
influential and defining: evidence leading to the reality of a myth, ancient ancestors, inter-dimensionality -- on and on.
we're in the cradle and mike's doin' the rocking.
rock on.

from 2007, here's an interesting blog entry that presents a
lawrence livermore-national labs study of several sentient beings and their invisibility.
swipe and read some pretty amazing stuff. (http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/invisible-bf/)

"...most anybody can communicate with the bigfoot, given the proper instruction."

Frances
15th January 2014, 14:45
Wow, great article Jimmer. Ties in with so much that we have been learning.

Mojo recorded some electromagnetic snapping on one of his videos that he took in Oregon.
Church isolated the sound for him.
Maybe yes maybe no, but I do know this, Mojo is a person who in my view could communicate with the Sasquatch people.
Frances.

Frances
15th January 2014, 16:55
http://youtu.be/XfIUhfv-yaM

This video was posted by Sasquatch Canada.
I don't know much about it, but there is written commentary as the video progresses.
Russian Bigfoot Vocalisations.
Quite interesting.
Frances.

Video 5mins.

jimmer
15th January 2014, 17:37
an interesting find indeed, frances.

my take is it just doesn't go anywhere.
supposedly recorded at a feeding trough,
does it sound like there was any eating/feeding going on?
just a lot of huffing and puffing.

the low, oscillating gargling tones sound 'tampered', to me.

no inhale vocals like mike's recordings.

here's what bigfootevidence.blogspot.ca has to say:

The following alleged recordings were captured in Russia by a man named "Islam".
Last month, Russian Bigfoot researcher Igor Burtsev, who was unsure of the audio's authenticity,
sent the recordings to cryptolinguist Scott Nelson in North America for an opinion.
After some careful analysis, Nelson concluded the recordings were probably faked. The vocalization,
which bears a remarkable resemblance to Mike Patterson's audio in Ontario Canada -- which he claims to be legit.
Ron Moorehead, the person who recorded the Sierra Sounds suggested to Burtsev that the language may not sound
like the ones he recorded in the Sierras, but it does not necessarily mean the audio is fake.
Burtsev explains his initial excitement in a Russian publication (Russian to English translation):

Recording just shocked me! First on our territory (I mean the Soviet Union and the Russian Federation) appeared such records!
Previously, they were received and investigated only in America. I sent a recording kriptolingvistu Scott Nelson in the United States.
Alas, his answer was negative ... But later, another researcher recordings bigfoot, Ron Morehead, encouraged me, saying that Nelson compared
with a California records, and your may not correspond to the ... ( well, Russian language is also English is not like! - Encyclopedia ).
Then I sent the recording Natalia Puzanov in the Chelyabinsk region. Natalya - years of experience with family "devils", she heard many times "Leshunyu"
(head of the family). Natalia assured that the real voice and mumbling like. I also posted a recording Robin Lynn (USA). Robin -
participant of the international conference on hominology in Kuzbass in 2011. Robin enthusiastically confirmed that, yes, it is -
their voice is not fake, she heard many times such voices in research and the search of Bigfoot. In place of research Robin Lynn, too,
by the way, there was "a friend" who has been given the name Black (Blackie). Growth as it was, roughly, about three meters.
So - no doubt remains, the real record. Obtained were as follows: Islam put food into the trough, and under it - included recorder, closing branches.
"Black" came and took the food and ate there muttering. And when he was gone, Islam took the recorder.
Islam itself was expecting about 50 m from the feeders and saw the dark silhouette of the "Black."
Islam also put hair on branches near the feeders. When it is possible, he will send them for analysis.
December 29 Maxim took the camera and went to his mountain, again saw the marks and took them off to the camera now.
There he also found hair on the tree where there were creases.

Frances
15th January 2014, 17:47
I get the feeling there will be more from researchers in Russia.
The amount of information flowing at the moment for me feels like a Tsunami.
Frances.

jimmer
15th January 2014, 17:55
here's m.k. analyzing two vocalization recordings, one from the deep south,
the other from the north, USA.

pretty interesting.
different regional 'dialects'?
scott nelson says that mike's recording aren't authentic
because they don't sound like ron morehead's benchmark sierra recordings.
mike's point is, like us, sas communicate with different regional dialects.
see what you think.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dr8Pl4D6GrI

Frances
15th January 2014, 20:18
The audio from the Deep South reminds me of the Sierra Sounds audio.
I was going to post the Sierra Sounds audio as it's not on the thread and it's very good.
I had a few problems so I was wondering if you could do it Jimmer.
Hope you don't think I am being lazy, but I do like your presentations.
Frances.

samos
15th January 2014, 22:14
I read today that Mike decided last minute not to go forward with talking about the new strangeness going on. Too controversial, he says. So many times, it is up to us to read between the lines. Has anyone else noticed that Mike seems to have an understanding of who they are and what they are without ever having any mind speak with them? His cryptic messages say things like ...There has been no mind "speak" , per se....So, what word is it that he would replace within the quotations?

In the interview, the mention of the dog at the cottage, and its behavior, alluded to the fact that there is activity within the cottage. I've been aware of a few things which I believe took place inside, but it is only hearsay. So, what-say...you all?

Also, the musical notes or humming sound?? I, myself, would find those notes on the piano the moment I got home.
It seems important to learn more about it. Is this something any of you have heard about elsewhere? Hopefully it is not the Morlocks !!! Hah....

jimmer
15th January 2014, 23:44
So, what word is it that he would replace within the quotations?

that, is a subtle catch, samos.
good question to post to mike?
he knows of our get togethers here and may fill in the blank for you.
I bet at some point he realized that he should hold some on what
he knows for the book. he also has been working with m. k.'s webmaster
or programmer on a new website.
you know, if I was in the middle of something like this
and as mike says 'over his head', I'd hold back, too.
why rush it. he's into it for the long-haul.
makes it all the more enticing, for sure.

see if you get lucky. we're all ears : )

jimmer
15th January 2014, 23:58
The audio from the Deep South reminds me of the Sierra Sounds audio.
I was going to post the Sierra Sounds audio as it's not on the thread and it's very good.
I had a few problems so I was wondering if you could do it Jimmer.
Hope you don't think I am being lazy, but I do like your presentations.
Frances.

your wish is my command, frances.

since ron morehead sells commerical disks of the vocalizations,
all I could find was this excerpt from "In Search of..."

here 'tis.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SCMQCwi1vw
upon further review, here's a two-part interview with ron morehead and scott nelson.
this is a repost from the ol' Bigfoot Vocalizations (pre-crash).
as we know, nelson, through his fixation on the seirra sounds and
after reviewing mike's audio, doesn't buy mike's authenticity.
as we've learned, mike believes that sas must have regional dialects.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeqWTsXSOFM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5T8BGDoe_I

Frances
16th January 2014, 10:19
http://youtu.be/yabkhwK2iDs

Re - Post. Audio comparison May 10th 2013. Mike Paterson. Sasquatch Onterio.
I have re - posted this video mainly for my own benefit. No human could make those vocalisations.
When I have the sound turned right up, my I pad actually vibrates.
Frances.

Video 6mins.

jimmer
16th January 2014, 11:55
those early audios were a real breakthrough.
mike's chuckle at 4:29 -- part chortle, part nerves.
it's all too much...'he's talking.'

jsb_swampfox
16th January 2014, 14:03
This is an awesome situation. It has taken me a week to go thru all Mike's utube vids. I just got to listen to his latest interview. I am blown away. I have been a long time believer in big foot but have never really been convince anyone has had a true encounter until this guy. Jimmer, Thanks a ton for bringing this to the forum. I freekin still have goose bumps.
The multidimensional aspect of this is what brings this to a truth for me. I find it very interesting that physical objects (like hair, marbles, weaving's, etc) are left here in our dimension but are coming from somewhere else. WOW!

jimmer
16th January 2014, 15:08
WOW!

wow is the operative word for this story.

with all the fantastic, hard-to-get-a-hold-of stuff flying around TOT,
this fantastic story, the legend of bigfoot, is actually taking hold and appears to be developing upon itself, advancing.

will 2014 be mike's big breakthrough year?

we'll all stay tuned.

mojo
16th January 2014, 19:24
interesting audio sample

edit(duplicate posting)

jimmer
16th January 2014, 20:17
yah, know what you mean. mojo ; )

http://jandeane81.com/threads/317-Bigfoot-Vocalizations-2?p=9474&viewfull=1#post9474

Frances
17th January 2014, 13:36
http://youtu.be/XfIUhfv-yaM
http://youtu.be/vu4iZC5jq6Y

Listen in at 3mins to Sasquatch feeding and breathing, Sasquatch Ontario

Then listen to the above Russian video of Sasquatch feeding and breathing.
Frances.

jimmer
17th January 2014, 15:36
hmm, there are close similarities.

on mike's, the grunting, sniffing clearly accompanies the feeding.
on the russian audio, at a feeding trough, the grunting does not seem to be
connected to feeding. just grunting all the way through.
can you tell I always have my skeptics hat on?

you do have good ears, frances.
sure desires further analysis and openness.

Frances
17th January 2014, 16:07
The video I wanted was, Insane Activity At The Gift Tree. That's the one with the blue eyed baby, you have a photograph posted. That's the one that has been taken down by Mike.
There is more of the same on that one.
I will look out for it, hope it comes back.
Frances.

samos
17th January 2014, 23:07
Hello All, I still haven't received message back from Mike but it is not unusual to take 2-3 days for replies from him. I did ask the tough questions that need to be asked....and he's never let me down.

Frances, I questioned Mike on the gift tree experience (insane activity....). Your point about it is valid. The fact that this video has been pulled, the new revelations about a different creature, and sharp teeth marks discovered in the food gifts, all give speculative reason to believe there was something else happening that night.

Here are two quotes from him today that I find interesting...."Definitely unknown to the extreme Dave. I just hope we all come through unscathed. " Curious....new reasons to be fearful? And second one was in response to one of the interviewers from the radio show...." I was thrown off a little with the teeth question due to photos taken by them and things we've seen bitten into so I wasn't sure how to answer that. Truth is we don't know the answer." I questioned Mike if the early eye photos (walleye pics), might be this new species? Those eyes were different than the others and taken at the gifting tree (or thereabouts???).

There does appear to be some new concerns up there, judging by his words.

Jimmer....would you label this as Sasquatch activity (typical?), or something more?

I have seen the dimensional aspect present in other cases, even if they don't recognize the signs. Mike's experiences and openness gives a great schematic to go by. Case in point (I'll be brief)...SusanFarns researchers (see YT), a group ascended a mountain, single file, spaced apart approximately 30 yrds apart from each other. A researcher in the rear was astonished to see a 17" Sasquatch track crossing directly over top a fellow researcher's print further up the line. They reveled in the stealthiness of the creature, and how elusive at such close range. This is on one of their many videos. On the humorous side, all the plaster castings had been flipped over when they went to retrieve them, as if inspected....

Frances
17th January 2014, 23:17
You have great insight and new perspectives Samos. You give new information to this extraordinary thread. I enjoy the posts as I am sure a lot of other people do also.
I will visit Susan Farns Youtube site.
Frances.

jimmer
17th January 2014, 23:25
1 I questioned Mike if the early eye photos (walleye pics), might be this new species?

2 Jimmer....would you label this as Sasquatch activity (typical?), or something more?

3 They reveled in the stealthiness of the creature, and how elusive at such close range. This is on one of their many videos. .

1 what new species? have you and frances been PMing behind our backs ; )

2 I am not an expert, so -- got me. this is the closest we've ever gotten to something authentic in this area.
even the 'experts' only know what they know. mike is getting a mind-boggling brain full.
3 what videos? on YT? if so, please post 'em here if you can.

thanks for digging into this, samos.

samos
17th January 2014, 23:41
Hah hah, Frances and I will never tell :)

In Mike's recent interview he stated they have unknowingly captured a photograph of an unusual creature, which caused him to use several expletives when he saw it. He will not show it, or even discuss it. It is something the owner captured on film, looking at them. When I said "Walleye pics", it is just a nick name I have given them. These were the bulging eyes, similar to a fish...or something?? I'm only wondering if there is a connection to him clamming up?

I've asked Mike to expand upon the subject...if even cryptically. Location of picture, size, anything?...just a little more info. Mike knows my analytical nature and downright obsession with this topic. Yes, 2014 will be one hell of a year, by the looks of things up there!

I will look for the videos from SusanFarns on YT. These researchers are in Arizona, still looking for Prime(Apes) :) Never once have they discussed dimensional aspect, with probably 200 videos. They do have some great evidence, though. Nesting sites, prints, even a few remarkable trail cam shots. Oh, and "The Thing at the Cooler"...a late night campsite visitor caught on film.

You're welcome for the dig.....it's what I do :)

Frances
17th January 2014, 23:47
You made me laugh Jimmer, see posts 111 and 114.
Frances.

samos
18th January 2014, 01:29
http://youtu.be/O_Qhf-aVG8A


This is one of the more unknown videos of Mike (posted July 2013). It is from one of his good friends in Toronto. His channel is Skookumm, and has a few good videos, too. If you haven't seen it.....enjoy !

jimmer
18th January 2014, 12:55
what do you know. I've never seen mike collaborate
with anyone but the homeowner. really interesting video.
skookumm is the one who has posted support for mike,
challenging mike's detractors (from page one of our thread). (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80guWGMR44Y)

jimmer
18th January 2014, 13:22
ready for a laugh?
if you haven't seen this yet, here is the most tortured,
over-the-top anaysis of the roger patterson 1967 bigfoot footage, ever.
this guy 'dumddumdum' sees naked people all over the place!

be prepared for you WTF moment of the day : )


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCYIvYSS-Vk

samos
18th January 2014, 20:03
Skookumm is a great guy, funny and eager to correspond about Sasquatch. His enthusiasm surpasses mine ten fold ! If you haven't seen his own personal encounter video, it's worth watching. A retelling of his experience when he was a kid....

http://youtu.be/7uHLupF5u9o


I just received message reply from Sasquatch Ontario in which he addressed all of the questions I asked. I'll post that which I believe he would have no objection to. He has expanded on a few things of interest, and I would like to take a short time to mull it over, first. Bear with me....

jimmer
19th January 2014, 14:10
I just received message reply from Sasquatch Ontario in which he addressed all of the questions I asked. I'll post that which I believe he would have no objection to. He has expanded on a few things of interest, and I would like to take a short time to mull it over, first. Bear with me....

thanks for the video and now, with mike's reply, our curiosity is officially peaked.

jimmer
19th January 2014, 14:43
while we await samos' info from mike, here's a july 2013 video
by skookumm posted after his session with mike (posted above), responding to
to a 'competing' sas group and their claim to authentic sas recordings and
their attacks that mike's recording are bogus -- including scott nelson's email
to mike, backing off his claims that mike's audio is not authentic.

"they're sending me threatening letters..."


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvcz_OVoDdc

jimmer
19th January 2014, 15:23
here's something to investigate and ponder.
from mike's 'one step at a time (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S03d1ipNDbA)' from sept. 2013,
a series of 'sas selfies' are shown. one image, at 3:12
shows ruffled fur. in the image corner there appears to
be part of a building structure. what is it and where is it?
interior or exterior?
http://youtu.be/S03d1ipNDbA?t=3m10s

to me, it appears to be metal channeling meeting a strip of wood molding, butting up
to wood planks. like either a sliding door or window.
what say you?

http://i953.photobucket.com/albums/ae18/jimmerer/sas1_zps2b199886.jpg
rotated clockwise:
http://i953.photobucket.com/albums/ae18/jimmerer/sas2_zpsfdbef43f.jpg

Frances
19th January 2014, 16:35
The pink fleshy part that sticks out. That puts me in mind of a dogs tongue which can be thin and slightly rounded at the end.
I don't think this is a photograph of a 3rd dimensional dog, but 4th dimension , who knows.
Frances.

jimmer
19th January 2014, 17:32
I don't think this is a photograph of a 3rd dimensional dog, but 4th dimension , who knows.

ok, but what about the wood?
where is that from?
the cameras have been left near the gift
tree location, hundreds of yards from the cottage.
some proof that sas carries the camera off-site,
take pictures and return the camera on-site?

Frances
19th January 2014, 20:59
Mike has no idea where this was taken. Mike and the owner never see a flash go off when the photo is taken.
So in my view the camera has to be taken to another property and used.
It is replaced in the same spot it was taken from.
The eye photos are the only clear ones to me. I have problems trying to know what the above photos are.
Frances.

samos
19th January 2014, 21:40
The picture with the wood frame may be the most bizarre picture of them all. Even Mike has said they have no clue, and had for a long time, decided not to post it. The pink, fleshy area, Frances, is what Mike considers to be an ear. I'm not sure (of anything, actually), concerning that photograph. I cannot define if it is inside or outside, but there does seem to be a chair sitting in the doorway. One thing that has been very strange is that of all the self photos taken, Mike has never seen a flash go off in that gift tree area. They usually do this after dark, an hour at a time, and sit out in the chairs to watch the forest (this is about as long as the batteries will last). Maybe from our perspective, the camera never moves...from theirs, it goes on a journey, being passed around. In his latest interview, he said they no longer even have to turn the camera on....wow. You have to consider that some of these pictures may be interdimensional .

So, one of the questions I posed to Mike was about their claims to having heard musical tones or "hums" coming from the forest. I asked him to expand on this if he could, and answer whether it was single, sustained or multiple notes, and has it happened on other occasions? Also, I asked if he had identified them on a musical scale? Here is his reply : "In the earlier months we recorded something that made 3 musical notes and have heard other single notes, low end, very audible. They're not sustained. Not sure the key. I play guitar by ear, have never been diligent at theory. They're more of a baritone."

Of course, it could be possible to explain, but Mike has found it intriguing and un-identifiable. Since he is right there on the front line, I will accept his take on this strangeness. Seems almost ET...ish.

More to come.........

samos
19th January 2014, 21:42
sorry Frances, I didn't see your post #163 while I composed...didn't mean to repeat your words.

jimmer
20th January 2014, 13:44
The pink, fleshy area, Frances, is what Mike considers to be an ear.

that, is the long held back 'ear' photo?
really.

Frances
20th January 2014, 21:45
http://youtu.be/tOn2Zh5A3-w

This video was posted by Bob Garrett, a researcher.
Bears will tear up a camp but they don't tear up the forest or place X signs with branches.
I don't know any more than what is in the video but the comments are interesting.
Frances.

Video 23mins.

Frances
20th January 2014, 21:52
The comments I refer to are the comments on the you tube version of the video.
Comments and questions which are made by the people who view the video which can be quite revealing.
Frances.

Frances
20th January 2014, 22:05
http://youtu.be/q8yPMREj67I

Short video by Bob Garrett who returned to the camp site during the day.
Video 3mins.
Frances.

samos
20th January 2014, 23:40
This is an interesting analysis video of a Sasquatch in the Sequoias. Film stabilization and enhancements often times bring out details we might easily dismiss. I'm on the fence with this one, but it is compelling.

http://youtu.be/gbcC5xGPb6Y

Jimmer, thanks for opening this thread. It's nice to find like-minded people...In answer to your question with the ear photo...yes, that was the one. I believe it was the background (paneling) which was so controversial. I do like how you rotated it for a different view. When dealing with a dimensional aspect, I guess we should regard it from all angles. Would I be surprised to see a Sasquatch photographed upside down next to the tent?....LOL, probably not !

More from Mike's reply.....Obviously, the announcement of photographing a different "cryptid" at this same location is big news. That topped my list as something I wanted to ask about. Mike stated he was not going to talk about it at this time, but I asked him to give a few "snippits". Would it be possible to tell me the general size of the creature, where it was taken and was it possibly one from the self taken photos? Is the image clear with unobstructed view, and finally, could this be the creature who is displaying sharp teeth marks in the food gifts? Honestly, I didn't think he would reply to that, and since he did not ask for confidentiality, I will give you his answer.....

"The other one standing above the little guy had a long face. Couldn't see any body whatsoever from behind the tree, just the head sticking out. It was on the property in the gift tree area as the owner was taking blind shots (not looking when he photographed). No it doesn't resemble any selfie shots. It's quite clear and not up close. Sharp teeth? I don't think so but I don't know. "

So, a new creature. Sasquatch with elongated face or other?? Who knows? It is interesting that a small Sasquatch is below it in the same photo, apparently. I wonder if this could also be the "splayed toe" visitor, as there seems to only be one, among all the others.
Perhaps his interview in February will reveal more.

Anyone have an opinion or thoughts of wonderment?

Frances
21st January 2014, 00:01
Yes Samos, I have wondered about reports of the dog people, I have seen some reports about sightings of these creatures but I know nothing about them,
If I believe in Sasquatch and the fact that they are inter dimensional people , then I have to believe there are sightings of Dog People.
I am still trying to get my head round it.
Frances.

samos
21st January 2014, 00:15
That is kind of what it sounds like, Frances....minus the sharp teeth. There are reports of sasquatch with "snouts", but still a sasquatch, none the less. I guess we'll have to wait and see.

This is an eyewitness account from a chiropractor. Possible dogman/sasquatch

http://youtu.be/SvWzpgeuFRk

jimmer
21st January 2014, 13:08
which photo/video are we talking about -- large and small sas?

"The other one standing above the little guy had a long face..."

btw: thanks for the videos.

here's another good one from bob garrett.
footprints and howls.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeBbqZ1pQIU

jimmer
21st January 2014, 13:52
from the facebook find bigfoot archives: footprints.
early on, they interviewed mike.
I've repeatedly requested them to repost, without reply. (http://www.youtube.com/user/facebookfindbigfoot/videos)
after their big facebook take down, they reposted some content to a
new YT site, then nothing. wonder what's up with them?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LN-a_hegWU

jimmer
21st January 2014, 18:09
This video was posted by Bob Garrett, a researcher.
Bears will tear up a camp but they don't tear up the forest or place X signs with branches.
I don't know any more than what is in the video but the comments are interesting.
Frances.

that is really spooky. any reported missing persons?
did anyone claim the site as theirs?
another video on bob's page shows a similar torn up camp.
could that be sas 'warning'? mike got his and kept on going,
but could we get over, survive such a violent act and return?
no way : /

Frances
21st January 2014, 18:28
With the Bob Garrett video re Torn Up Camp, I am of the opinion going by Bob's lack of answers to his viewers that he is under instructions to keep quiet about it. His viewers have picked up on this and they mention it in their comments.
I believe Bob had to take that video down but has put it back up.
Also the 3min video he had to cut short, due to being watched by a park warden.

People don't destroy or leave expensive tents and equipment behind for no reason.
Frances.

jimmer
21st January 2014, 18:45
With the Bob Garrett video re Torn Up Camp, I am of the opinion going by Bob's lack of answers to his viewers that he is under instructions to keep quiet about it. His viewers have picked up on this and they mention it in their comments.
I believe Bob had to take that video down but has put it back up.
Also the 3min video he had to cut short, due to being watched by a park warden.

People don't destroy or leave expensive tents and equipment behind for no reason.
Frances.

sounds about right, frances.
cover up!
but why?

Frances
21st January 2014, 19:29
http://youtu.be/_cINozXvaEo

Posted by Sasquatch Canada.
Short video but interesting with normal, slow motion and HD viewing.
Frances.

jimmer
21st January 2014, 21:53
here's a compilation of bigfoot related stories and info.
what perked my ears happens at 11:38 --
native americans say they can communicate with sas in
their native language.

should mike attempt to really communicate
with nephie using the regional native american language?

friend = powhatan


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=42VMtnPmcEE

samos
21st January 2014, 22:48
which photo/video are we talking about -- large and small sas?

Hi Jimmer, the photo Mike is talking about was announced during his internet radio interview (Jan 11th). It is still available to listen and he posts the link. Just like the ear photo, at some point i'm sure he will share it.

You asked about using Native language....I believe they understand any language, and it does not matter if it is Chinese. The Birthday candle incident, shows a clear, thorough understanding of our language. (Birthday candle incident from Radio interview with Bill Lee).

To add further evidence to this theory....more from Mike's recent reply. Mike had also mentioned (in the interview) that a wool blanket had been laid out for him where he sets up his tent. Usually, he lays down a tarp underneath his tent. This "welcome mat" was already there upon his arrival and a woven gift of his glyph (remember Algiz?), was left at the gift tree. This new weave included a hoop for wearing on a necklace, again... intended to be inverted.

I questioned him as to whether or not he had forgotten his tarp, since they seem to read his mind regularly. And also, if he could tell if it was put out there that day, knowing he was arriving?

"I didn't forget the tarp. They just know I put one under the tent and we're welcoming me with something familiar to me. They're very attentive towards us and the things we do. Yes it was placed there that day as the owner and wife were already there the previous day. They'd checked the area several hours earlier telling them that I was coming that day. The blanket had been folded up sitting in another position nearby. They'd also left me a hand woven gift nearby at the gift tree about 15ft. away. Both were waiting for me upon arrival."

So, did Sasquatch understand the language spoken to them? or thoughts....not sure? But they seem to have no trouble understanding. Incidentally, the wool blanket had been left out for Sasquatch nearly a year earlier, when they were first experimenting with gifts. It was never touched until this event.

Frances
21st January 2014, 23:03
Hello Samos, loved the Big Red Sasquatch video, we go deeper and deeper into this puzzle of Sasquatch.
We sometimes raise more questions than answers, but I enjoy the journey and the knowledge it brings with it.
I hope we gain a greater understanding this year as I feel we have come a long way with Mike Paterson, who is on his own personal journey.
Frances.

jimmer
22nd January 2014, 14:16
This is an interesting analysis video of a Sasquatch in the Sequoias. Film stabilization and enhancements often times bring out details we might easily dismiss. I'm on the fence with this one, but it is compelling.

here's the original shot documentary.
I'm also on the fence.
in this context, the footage seems staged.
more information is needed to think this
is authentic. (although, it does hit all the
stride, arm length, no neck criteria.)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ieamRzJqPgs&list=UUL52AZGdNvNYCbQNoShMAqA&feature=c4-overview

samos
22nd January 2014, 22:00
Thanks for posting that, Jimmer. I'd say case closed !!

jimmer
22nd January 2014, 22:51
funny, isn't it, samos.
the sas really looks good.
someone spent big bucks.

it was sophomoric direction
that did it in.
the camera work was just
too predicable.

besides the sas footage, the
rest of it was click and paste
and didn't have a point of view
or a reason, other than framing
the end sequence.

in the hands of a skilled editor,
director, this hoaxed piece could have
had the world buzzing.

gee, I wonder how mike's doing?
these sidebar videos are interesting,
but we need some inspiration.

samos
22nd January 2014, 23:36
Yes, nothing is being posted in his comment sections, either. There is a lot of silence up there for such a talkative Sasquatch!!

I did ask Mike in PM about the mind speak aspect he talks about. This was how I phrased the question and his predictable, somewhat cryptic answer.... "I only want to ask if the activity is within the cottage, and getting more regular....within? You had answered a subscribers comment saying - no mind "speak" going on, but is there some other word you might place in those quotations?"

His reply: "What goes on within the cottage is confidential at this time. As far as mind speak, I prefer to keep that confidential at this time as well. Things are constantly progressing though. "

Am I (We), to read between the lines in that answer? He could have said..."Sorry, confidential". and that's that ! Personally, I feel there is so much more than just Sasquatch going on up there. Remember "Discovering a Primal People"?...ah, those were the days :)

jimmer
23rd January 2014, 11:59
"What goes on within the cottage is confidential at this time."

in the past, when mike would talk like this, we've learned to assume there's something going on.

what was your tip off? the dog barking?

I don't recall picking up on interior cottage events or activity.

as for mike's silence, perhaps he's busy writing.

jimmer
23rd January 2014, 14:26
as an interesting sidebar, here's an interview
with m.k. davis. is bigfoot human? (http://podbay.fm/show/257243172/e/1177552800?autostart=1)

mojo
23rd January 2014, 17:59
thanks for all the energy keeping information flowing...:)

samos
24th January 2014, 00:28
Jimmer, this is from Mike's recent interview....Question...Are there dogs or pets present to see these interactions? "Yeah, there are pets present (chuckle) and they definitely react...." How do they react? "Ummm, they run out of the room, start barking.......ummm, (pause) uhhhhhh" (awkward moment sensed). You say...run out of the Room??? (then Mike quickly back pedals..it's pretty obvious) "umm you know, they might hear something outside and then in another room and run into another room kind of thing...their reaction, ummm, you can tell they know something is going on."

I had to type that like a court stenographer....'tweren't easy !

Now, I like Mike just fine and he is a real gentleman, so I don't mean to shed him in a bad light. Live interviews are supposed to be tough (this one was not, though), in getting to the real questions. Probably was just something he was not prepared to answer. But it does provide certain clues as to "possible" activity within the cottage.

There are rumors of other things...but they will have to remain confidential, "at this time" :)

jimmer
24th January 2014, 12:53
"...but they will have to remain confidential, "at this time"

that's interesting.

nice work, samos and thanks for the detail.

always with my leap of faith hat on, I do sense
that mike is into something so big, it's bigger
than any of his original expectations.
in fact, it could be down right scary.

if you listen to his early interviews (from page 1),
mike's conversational demeanor is loose, open
and quick to reply. but lately, as we listen, he is very
ponderous, careful, plodding, almost stammering at times,
as if there is a weight.

when the extraordinary presents itself, how would we react?

jimmer
24th January 2014, 20:36
moving the conversion forward, here are bigfoot
vocalizations from 2012, in minnesota USA.
it gets better as it goes -- haunting.

Published on Apr 30, 2012
March 15, 2012 in St Louis County, Minnesota, a field investigator's audio recorder captures the voices of four vocalizers,
two in the background, and two in the foreground. To the passive observer this might easily be dismissed as wolf howls.
But closer scrutiny discloses a number of featurs typical of suspected sasquatch vocals captured across the breadth of North America.
These include whoops, integrated wood knocks, a "moan" howl, pitch breaks and vowel transitions from /oo/ to /aa/.
Widely held speculation suggests sasquatch employ mimicry in their vocalizations, possibly as a form of subterfuge.
This recording would lend credibility to such a theory.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmWXp3jAKoI

Frances
24th January 2014, 22:02
I had on my ear phones, when the big sounds came I nearly jumped out of my skin.
Very powerful vocalisations.
For all the sounds and vocalisations from Sasquatch are different, I sense a similarity between them, even the ones from different parts of the states .
Frances.

samos
24th January 2014, 22:22
Yes Frances, I agree. When I hear something so real and so inhuman....a feeling of certainty and seriousness registers in my mind.

Jimmer that was a great video...one of the best vocals (outside of Ontario :) I'm happy to have heard that one. Very haunting, indeed !! There is something about 4 AM ....Sasquatch love to come out and play.

jimmer
25th January 2014, 13:02
the 6:30 segment sounds distinctly human to me.
quite different from the rest. sas do seem to have
various tonalities, enunciations, mimicry.
the duo tonalities is crazy. two sas vocalizing on note
really carries with power, like a long-distance call.
and all of this seems sas to sas, although, it could
also be a warning, a sort of territorial marker -- keep out!

most of mike's vocal recordings seem to be directed at his humankind.
early on, before his habituation took hold, lots of owl calls and howls.
later, more language-oriented vocals, to the present, human words.
what a trip.

jimmer
25th January 2014, 13:16
at first, this one may seem less impressive, but wait til the end.

here's a guy, like mike, who gave up on photographing sas
to concentrate on vocalizations.

the second vocal capture sounds like native american lingo.

but wait until the credits roll -- sounds just like mike's 'barn owl' mimicry recordings.
a match!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SlGzy7waznc

bonus round:
man comes face to face with big black sas and calls it in.
plus some more sas mimicry.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGcjDHZjUDM

mojo
26th January 2014, 01:20
thoughts about the 10 million bounty for bigfoot?

Frances
26th January 2014, 12:38
From my understanding Mojo, this is a reality TV show.
They want a cast of teams to go out to the various hot spots in the States where there have been Sasquatch sightings.
Reality TV shows only care about high viewing stats.
They pick people who are controversial, nasty, ignorant and with a dog eat dog attitude.
The combination of all these people would of course be competitive and at times explosive.
I have never seen the programme, if it came my way I would watch it to see if I was right or wrong.

I don't believe any of these people will get the bounty.
Frances.

I believe the money is only available to the teams that are taking part. It's not available to anybody that gives absolute proof.
I am happy to be corrected if I am wrong.

jimmer
26th January 2014, 13:55
I have to admit, at first I resisted, but I scummed and watched the last episode.

frances is correct, it's a reality show.
to win the cash, the contesting teams of bigfoot hunters
must provide scientific proof of existence: DNA, photography, tracks, hair samples, etc.
the results are judged by two bigfoot research experts.
each week, the team that gathers the poorest results, goes home.

it's about what you'd expect: these are the hunters who use trailcams, carry guns (no guns are allowed on the show) --
using traditional wildlife hunting memes to catch their prey.

one of the participants is that guy justin who claims to have killed a bigfoot baby. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRUn0828vFE)
a claim disproven by DNA analysis. he's a real mope.

from our perspective, studying mike's findings and techniques, the reality show is pretty funny and futile.

while interesting to sasquatch people like us, the show focuses on research techniques that will never
provide the money winning results the show promotes. during the last episode, the most interesting
thing to me was that all the 'contestants' exhibited a crazy, paranoid 'what was that!' mentality, seemingly hearing
or seeing a bigfoot everywhere -- helping to delegitimize the entire field of research.

conclusion: nothing good will come of this show. as with all TV entertainment, it's all about eyeballs and advertising.

Frances
26th January 2014, 14:49
I am really happy that I was introduced to Mikes journey first.
I have always thought Sasquatch was real but I was ignorant and un - educated about the subject.
I can now see what it is when your shown the true picture, I am not talking of the full picture.
The full picture has yet to be shown, in my view.

One time I would have been happy to watch the show and think maybe that was all there was to it.
Cameras, infra red, traps etc.
I now know better, but not all.
I would still watch the show if it came to the UK.
My curiosity would get the better of me.
Frances.

jimmer
26th January 2014, 16:30
here's the first episode, from spike.tv. (http://www.spike.com/episodes/e9glfm/bigfoot-bounty-bigfoots-blood-season-1-ep-101)

the other two released episodes are available under 'episode guide'.

futile I say : )

Frances
26th January 2014, 17:42
Thank you for the above post Jimmer, I will give it a view.
Frances.

Frances
26th January 2014, 17:54
http://disinfo.com/2013/10/sasquatch-seatco-indians-conversation-henry-franzoni/

Link to an interview given by Henry Franzoni.
He talks of Canine Sasquatch or Dog People, with muzzle like faces, exposed incisors ,fang like.
Talks of UFO's coming out of underground caverns.
He is of the opinion that Sasquatch live in these underground caverns.
The interview is in text format.

It all adds to the picture of Sasquatch.
Frances.

jimmer
26th January 2014, 18:09
Thank you for the above post Jimmer, I will give it a view.
Frances.

enjoy the commercials : /

Frances
26th January 2014, 22:43
http://one-vibration.com/group/thegospeloftheredman/forum/topics/sasquatch-and-native-americans?xg_source=activity#.UuWXfX-QGSM

On my travels through the internet I came across an article written by Gayle Highpine which she published.
She is a Kootenai Indian, she discusses North American Indians and the Sasquatch.
The article covers the spiritual/mystical aspects of Sasquatch .
Frances.

jimmer
27th January 2014, 13:02
Link to an interview given by Henry Franzoni.

more questions than answers, but what was said does flesh out mike's
ongoing story. really interesting about the 'underwater' habitats and more:

- invisibility
- mimicry
- superior intelligence
- "hillbilly/super scientists"
- separate indian tribe?
- they bury their own or the body just disappears
- live at a different vibration than us
- individual sas can have different abilities (telepathy...)
- these abilities are learned/developed, as they grow

jimmer
27th January 2014, 16:15
here's a good one -- an m. k. davis compilation of sas vocals.

Published on May 6, 2013
This is an absolutely fantastic compilation of audio files of alleged Bigfoot or Sasquatch sounds and vocalizations.
Some are mimicking human speech. Others are mimicking animal sounds. Some are just down right creepy!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQnkIBFhAQ4

Frances
27th January 2014, 17:08
It is a very good one, I even thought I heard a chain saw in there.
Going back to this one a few times so I can better absorb the vocals.
Frances.

jimmer
27th January 2014, 20:41
I listened twice.
what a compilation.

human sounding, animal sounding, young sounding,
native american sounding, sound effects sounding.
crazy and chilling.

and when it's said that the 'serria sounds' are the only
authentic sas vocalizations ever recorded, it's clear that
researchers need to loosen up some. you know, more
scientific inquiry/curiosity, rather than smug know-it-alls.

Frances
27th January 2014, 22:00
By the way Jimmer, I like your ever changing avatar, the colours are lovely allthough I have no idea what it is.
Frances.

jimmer
27th January 2014, 22:57
By the way Jimmer, I like your ever changing avatar, the colours are lovely allthough I have no idea what it is.
Frances.
new steampunk machine toys : )

jimmer
28th January 2014, 12:22
is mike coming out of hibernation?

here's his answer about the futility of hair samples:

Dominic Parry22 hours ago

What happens to hair samples exactly?

Sasquatch Ontario9 hours ago

+Dominic Parry From my understanding there's no medulla therefore very difficult to extract dna.

when mike first talked about hair samples not being a way of authenticity, I scratched my head.
for years, hair sampling for sas dna was considered a bona fided path to proof.
now, I understand where he's coming from.

and now that mike is accomplishing his first goal of contact,
what's next?

Sasquatch Ontario9 hours ago
Visual verbal communication would be great.
Learning their language and their ways. Ancient wisdom.
Sitting together having a chat over a couple cold ones :) 

Frances
28th January 2014, 19:08
http://i1287.photobucket.com/albums/a632/nicolaR1/63698de6eead0f33aa97d96361b7b21a_zps519ad816.jpg

Screen shot. Todd Standing took this photograph of a Sasquatch.
Frances.

Frances
28th January 2014, 20:26
http://youtu.be/EVVGZZl0TKI

Published Nov 7 2013.
Recorded by Norma Trent on her property in Bruno West Virginia.
Sasquatch openly expressing itself in day light hours.
Frances.

jimmer
28th January 2014, 20:34
what's your take on this standing images and documentary?
they've been in the pipeline forever.
something fishy?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_-zLdoCaQU

from the same doc, the video of the
sleeping sas. the hair looks faux.
no shine. dull, dead, flat and matted.
compare the sas in these videos.
quite different -- from the same doc.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zl6u0SJx-Ao


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Gi3oCnYGnc

Frances
28th January 2014, 21:01
http://www.ourcuriousworld.com/PDFs/HatcherArticle.pdf

This is a very interesting article written by David Hatcher Childress.
It is 4 pages long and is self explanatory.
Covers the story and background of the dead Sasquarch in the photograph.
Photograph reported to be 200 years old.
Frances.

Frances
28th January 2014, 21:29
About the two above photographs .
One is said to be a mountain lion.
One is said to be a bear

So I cannot say if the photos are of a Sasquatch at all. They maybe mountain lion and bear.
Frances.



It's always helpful for anybody who goes deep into this subject to know what is out there and most importantly True.

samos
28th January 2014, 22:19
I think Todd Standing is a hoaxer. Sad to say, but I get that vibe. There was a time when I had high hopes for Dr Melba Ketchum and the DNA study she was doing....until I realized she was mixed up with him. Once they started discussing the dollar amounts involved with this study, I realized they were just looking for their cut.

Hair samples could be analyzed in many ways, I'm sure. I believe Mike has many collected so far...no medulla's? Not one? They are the only tangible proof he has...audio, video, photos and casts only go so far....but hair in hand....that's an important piece of the puzzle.

Learning their language and their ways. Ancient wisdom.......oh boy, Talking with Sasquatch 3 is out....

A few phrases or words Mike captured on audio, had somewhat translated in Latin (based) and also I found some Malaysian words that fit well. Interesting to hear Mike comment that he thought their language sounded like a cross between Native Indian/Asian. Words that do seem to translate appeared to be spoken in third person, though. Example: (Nyedawho or Nya-Tahu) = "He Knows"...so he might be saying "Mike, Flower, Tree....I understand ! " . Their language could be quite broken, and simple...straight to the point. I hope that makes sense?

Sitting together having a chat over a couple cold ones ....Did you know that Mike has stated in the past that they know for a fact Sasquatch had been into their beer supply? For a drink or just browsing? who knows? Perhaps more evidence of activity within the cottage?

Frances
29th January 2014, 09:25
I am no expert when it comes to analysing videos so I always have to give them the benefit of being true until they are proven otherwise.
I can believe that Sasquatch have different coats, long hair, shiny hair, matted hair and short hair.
My reason for this is because of the many factors, different tribes, different seasons/locations and ages.
Like the variations in reported types of faces, I would assume the same would be for the coats.

As with the vocalisations which are very varied and individual I think they are also a factor of different tribes and locations.

Mike has pointed out the oily residue that has been left on his car when Sasquatch have put hand prints on it.
I have seen reports from Native Americans that Sasquatch have a special oil that makes them invisible.
I see so many factors that form a bigger picture that I have to take them all in and not rule them out.
Frances.

jimmer
29th January 2014, 12:14
so many excellent posts.
we'll need time to digest.
thanks all.

samos, your take on nyedawho is really interesting.

"Example: (Nyedawho or Nya-Tahu) = "He Knows"...so he might be saying "Mike, Flower, Tree....I understand ! " .
Their language could be quite broken, and simple...straight to the point."

I too believe it's a phrase, with 'who' being the subject.
many time, nephatia croons, 'who' alone. what does 'who' in sas speak mean?

as for standing and the dr. ketchum,
if what they had was really breakthrough and authentic,
we'd all be applauding by now.
but what do we have?
a bunch of random video clips and claims.
nothing more.
maybe they'll surprise us with hard evidence
and maybe they won't.
for now, just another wanna-be.

jimmer
29th January 2014, 12:25
About the two above photographs .
One is said to be a mountain lion.
One is said to be a bear

So I cannot say if the photos are of a Sasquatch at all. They maybe mountain lion and bear.
Frances.

isn't it funny that those photos accompanying the article show no face?
wouldn't that be the first thing you document?

taking mike's research into account, it's nearly impossible to
shoot and kill a sas. with that in tow, what are those photos of?

conmen have been around as long as all of humanity.
the bar must stay high. proof is proof.
blurry photos prove nothing but an oddity.

mojo
29th January 2014, 14:33
there's no medulla therefore very difficult to extract dna.



it might be that there is no root bulb in the hair samples but still can determine other things such as color, texture, hair shape, and what if there are some shed hair samples (w/ root bulb) and they might be difficult to see without the aid of a microscope. The decision to not test the hair is a loss of potential proof and doesnt make sense.

Frances
29th January 2014, 14:51
http://youtu.be/xrf9A9bmHQo

Just to lighten the mood a bit.
Really funny 4min clip.
Well put together.
Frances.

jimmer
29th January 2014, 15:19
it might be that there is no root bulb in the hair samples but still can determine other things such as color, texture, hair shape, and what if there are some shed hair samples (w/ root bulb) and they might be difficult to see without the aid of a microscope. The decision to not test the hair is a loss of potential proof and doesnt make sense.

I tend to agree, mojo.
wonder if mike has already tested hair and got no definitive result?
his stance puts him out-on-a-limb from traditional sas research.
wonder what DNA specialists would say about it?

that said, one of mike's videos show CUs of hair samples,
exhibiting strange nodule offshoots. I asked him specifically
about that with no reply.

at 5:29


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-iCEISoXBQ

jimmer
29th January 2014, 15:32
Just to lighten the mood a bit.
Really funny 4min clip.
Well put together.
Frances.

that is devastating.

facebook finds bigfoot's fall from grace.

top 'o the heap > backs rick dyer > YT cancels site > dyer hoaxes again > discovered that FBFB mainstays use alias' > historic meltdown

what's your take on FBFB, their analyzes and what happened to them?

Frances
29th January 2014, 19:29
To be quite honest Jimmer, I came across that site on my travels through the Internet that is where I saw the blobsquatch spoof.
I did not follow it when it was active.
I only realised the posts were from last year when you pointed it out.
Frances.

Frances
29th January 2014, 19:41
I do know from an e mail I received, that last year Mike sent hair samples to,
Onterio Sasquatch Onterio Wildlife Field Research .
They were to be included in a DNA analysis being done by Brian Sykes in Oxford.

Brian Sykes had finished his sampling so the hair samples belonging to Mike were returned to him him.
Mike was not afraid to be part of the study, it was just a case of the hair samples being sent to late.
Frances.

jimmer
29th January 2014, 20:39
I do know from an e mail I received, that last year Mike sent hair samples to,
Onterio Sasquatch Onterio Wildlife Field Research .
They were to be included in a DNA analysis being done by Brian Sykes in Oxford.

Brian Sykes had finished his sampling so the hair samples belonging to Mike were returned to him him.
Mike was not afraid to be part of the study, it was just a case of the hair samples being sent to late.
Frances.

let me get this straight:

mike submitted hair samples too late to be included in the study?
never analyzed?

if so, I wonder where he discovered that sas hair has no medulla?

Frances
29th January 2014, 21:28
Yes Jimmer you are correct.
In one of Mikes videos it shows hair sample photographs.
The hair samples were under the microscope.
The people who took the photos were his friends.
So, maybe he is taking his information from them. I could be wrong.
Frances.

samos
29th January 2014, 22:18
Frances, the video was hilarious !! I loved it, and it was a good laugh after a hard day at work. Thanks.

I'm putting up a temporary avatar to share with you all. It is a recreation of a partial image we have all seen up in Ontario, but not in this fashion. I pasted a mirror image to recreate the whole face...I don't have the rights to this so it will only be up for a day or two.

Jimmer, yes, the word "Who" has been said many times...even in the earliest vocal recordings, while still down at the car. Remember when Mike would record from his tent? ...."That - is - Sasquatch"...I still remember listening intently, and being so amazed. It has been an incredible journey to watch (and listen) as it unfolds.

jimmer
29th January 2014, 22:33
I remember when mike first diagramed your avatar photo.
I was leaning in, squinting.
then the arrow and descriptions popped.
the eye description says 'white of eye' or
something like that.
to this day (a couple of days ago) I still
can't see any white-of-the-eye.

beginning at :25


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXxQ2JSIn4Q

jimmer
29th January 2014, 22:44
I was looking for the FBFB analysis of this
oldie but a goodie (one of their best),
but they must have lost it over the copyright
infringement thing.
this copy is stabilized by none other than
m.k. davis. this is a shorter version
of the full, original video.
the original puts into context how far
away the walker is. who in their right
mind would hoax this, for no one to see?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWgmTysIFIk

in fact, here's the original.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eD8XSQbayXs

samos
30th January 2014, 21:09
Jimmer, the Marble Mountain video is one of the best. I've not watched it in a while...Good post, Thanks. A few things came to mind, though. This alleged Sasquatch (and I do think it is), does not show any signs of dimensional capabilities here. Even the nesting site shows of a more permanent residence. Also, its behavior seems more primate-ish, and not sure how to handle the situation...more animalistic. Although we have been told different, the audio from Ontario seems to match this one's body language to some degree.

I think Mike's situation is the exception...and maybe something quite different.

I'm sure there is a wide range of "varieties" of Sasquatch, even within a single family unit. The photo evidence from Ontario shows varying colors, etc. My own cat had a litter of kittens...1 black, 3 grays, 1 blond. So, I don't find this unusual. I agree with Frances on language and dialects being diverse, too. It does stand to reason that Sas "abilities" vary, as well. I figure these are things that must be taught to them, but they can be taken along for the "ride" until they learn. Even a bird cannot fly at first....

These are probably old hat questions you all have answered long ago, but I thought I'd give my two cents :)

modwiz
30th January 2014, 22:01
That Marble Mountain footage was amazing in so many ways. The comments about turning Sas in for some fed dollars was stunning.

Taking over my abode would p1$$ me off.

jimmer
30th January 2014, 22:46
That Marble Mountain footage was amazing in so many ways. The comments about turning Sas in for some fed dollars was stunning.

Taking over my abode would p1$$ me off.

it's not really mentioned, but the campers were a group of 'challenged' kids and their advisors.
thus the insensitive comment, 'let's bag 'em' line, is pretty forgivable in that context.
and knowing what the campers were all about only shores up this events authenticity.
quite a mind bending thing.
and can you imagine, after experiencing that sighting, curling up in a
sleeping bag next to that den. I don't know if that's bravery or what.

Tonz
31st January 2014, 02:33
They all would have been running if he had turned towards them .

The camp sorta refuge area ,of the supposed Sasquatch, is easily man made,there are a few larger branches but nothing that a few blokes couldn't rip off a pine tree , they are not hard woods, they tend to snap off Farley easily , just a question of wait and they snap off .

The commentary of the hands reaching his knees, well i find it difficult to see that .for me , a hoax using the unsuspecting witnesses of the students to give some sorta credit.He wasn't far a maybe 20 minute hike at most , I would have continued to get closer to see his reaction. or retreated to set up a surveillance over his camp , say up a tree at some distance, ,,dunno , non of this made any sense to me.

samos
31st January 2014, 11:06
The commentary of the hands reaching his knees, well i find it difficult to see that

Tonton, right...they mention also that it's waving a fist and jumping around in anger. Didn't see any of that, either. The arm/hand length is not to the knees, but it does seem pretty long. Overall the figure looks large and not quite proportionate to a human form. I'm sure from the viewfinder they saw something remarkable, even though the camera captured a more blurry image. We need M.K. Davis on this one...hah

Nesting sites are always difficult to tell if manmade or other...I would think there should be other sign in the area to suggest possibilities. I don't know if I would have pursued, but I would like to know if it had left some tracks up there. Seems this is always the case with these sightings, hence the continuous enigma.

Tonz
31st January 2014, 11:47
Nesting sites are always difficult to tell if manmade or other...I would think there should be other sign in the area to suggest possibilities. I don't know if I would have pursued, but I would like to know if it had left some tracks up there. Seems this is always the case with these sightings, hence the continuous enigma.

For me there isn't a question to believe or not , It's more the enigma that puts me off, a little like et's ,there is no more need for enigma,just clear truths that allow clear awakenings,Sasquatch are no exception.I feel that are too many enigmas intentionally,call me strange but prefer strait forwardness ,.enigmas create symptoms of here say ,and he said, and she said and there is nothing truly to show. Unfortunately this has happened to much to this honest subject .

jimmer
31st January 2014, 23:15
Jimmer, the Marble Mountain video is one of the best. I've not watched it in a while...Good post, Thanks. A few things came to mind, though. This alleged Sasquatch (and I do think it is), does not show any signs of dimensional capabilities here. Even the nesting site shows of a more permanent residence. Also, its behavior seems more primate-ish, and not sure how to handle the situation...more animalistic. Although we have been told different, the audio from Ontario seems to match this one's body language to some degree.
not sure how you equate mike's vocals with body language?

I think Mike's situation is the exception...and maybe something quite different.
totally agree. with his 'portal' comments, he seems to be in a world of 'what.'

I'm sure there is a wide range of "varieties" of Sasquatch, even within a single family unit. The photo evidence from Ontario shows varying colors, etc. My own cat had a litter of kittens...1 black, 3 grays, 1 blond. So, I don't find this unusual. I agree with Frances on language and dialects being diverse, too. It does stand to reason that Sas "abilities" vary, as well. I figure these are things that must be taught to them, but they can be taken along for the "ride" until they learn. Even a bird cannot fly at first....
as for varying sas hair colors, look at out species. a red head can pop up, separated by generations of DNA.

These are probably old hat questions you all have answered long ago, but I thought I'd give my two cents :)
samos, until scientific proof is presented, nothing is finalized. we're taking notes and forming our opinions.
and opinions will and should change if new evidence contradicts established theories. we should all let our two cents rattle on.

jimmer
31st January 2014, 23:32
For me there isn't a question to believe or not , It's more the enigma that puts me off, a little like et's ,there is no more need for enigma,just clear truths that allow clear awakenings,Sasquatch are no exception.I feel that are too many enigmas intentionally,call me strange but prefer strait forwardness ,.enigmas create symptoms of here say ,and he said, and she said and there is nothing truly to show. Unfortunately this has happened to much to this honest subject .

I don't know, tonton, this video in context
seems to be authentic.
if you look at the beginning of the original footage
you see for a moment how far away the sighting
was. someone thought it was an hour hike away.

now, take a look at this promotional video of the the
'campus life' group. they seem to be religion-based
organization that helps challenged' children.
is this the profile of bigfoot hoaxers. it just does not make sense.

as an occam's razor guy myself, I need to
suspend disbelief to delve into a subject as
fantastic as the sasquatch people. try it, it helps.
when you can, review all the evidence mike
has presented over the past year or so, and then
re-view the marble mountain sighting again.

those arms do reach below the knees.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5qgT94rBgI

jimmer
31st January 2014, 23:45
one more thought on the marble mountain sighting.

somewhere on YT, there was a video analysis of the height
of the 'sasquatch' based on the size of the creature
as it passed by an outstretched tree limb. (http://youtu.be/L8VoapPvLoA?t=1m9s)
the video sends a 6 ft. subject up to that tree limb
location. a size comparison was split-screened to
show the creature to be at least 8 ft. tall.
I searched for this video without luck. it may have
been part of the defunct FBFB website.
if anyone knows of this video, please post.

Frances
31st January 2014, 23:46
You raise a good point Jimmer, I for one have not formed opinions that contradict what I have been seeing and learning from the Internet.
I am still trying to form the greater picture, I hope I get it.
I continue to watch, read and learn and the journey so far has been enlightening.

I don't mind being exposed to fake videos and photographs, the way I see it , is if it's out there true people will be able to pass on thier information to people like me, to keep me on the straight and narrow.
I know I am learning even with all the fakes.
Just like the UFO videos.
Frances.

samos
1st February 2014, 00:27
I'll keep an eye out for that video, Jimmer.

I once had a client who was 6' 11", and on first meeting, I thought he must be nearly 8 feet tall !! It is difficult to measure someone's accurate height from a visual. I think people don't actually realize the size of an 8 footer....that's huge!

I'm not sure how I equate language audio with body language, either LOL...I just get a feeling. Sometimes, Sasquatch Ontario vocals lack the "highly evolved" aspect Mike talks about.

samos
1st February 2014, 00:46
Hopefully this is the video you were looking for.
https://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=176280629079415

It would not post, but this address might copy/paste...FB/FB analysis

samos
1st February 2014, 12:43
Another great audio...like to hear your thoughts.



http://youtu.be/vFkjyTvai80

Frances
1st February 2014, 13:06
Wow, so much interaction and language there.
It's obvious Nephatia is teaching Mike his language.

The brown soil marks in the fresh snow prints are an indication that Sasquatch has come from another place and gone straight to fresh snow.

I will do more views and try to listen more intently.
Frances.

jimmer
1st February 2014, 13:22
what timing, samos.
the long awaited next step:
nephie teaching mike more sas language.
full phrases. more selfies. electric...

best YT replies so far:

the first one, responding to a theory that nephie is 'retarded':

Sasquatch Ontario3 hours ago

Sasquatch are spiritual beings. As far as getting close, he's physically touched 5 people.
I've had a young one grab my arm. I can feel the difference in finger size between them.
My guess is they don't utilize their voice very much for speaking.
These guys have some incredible abilities and communicating likely doesn't involve them speaking to each other like this.
When he first started talking and expressing english words, he couldn't pronounce them properly.
Now he says them with ease. He's learned how to speak several words in english and articulates them very well at this stage.
What people perceive about how they think sasquatch should be is likely not how they truly are.
There's much misconception and misinformation on this subject.
I think he's just having fun with the situation.
How can anyone decipher mental retardation when nobody has taken it to this level before (publicly)?
This is a first. There's much more to this situation than most are aware of. 

Sasquatch Ontario2 hours ago

Sasquatch are spiritual beings. They manifest a physical body at will, in part or in whole.
I've personally witnessed partial manifestation inches from my eyes just prior to being touched. This has happened several times.
Don't need a telephoto lens. I even sold my prime 300mm. It's too much. I don't need it. This isn't all about trying to get video or photos.
It's a long term development which is a slow process in gaining trust and building a relationship with them.
This isn't about appeasement. Yes, others are aware of this situation. It's flipped the entire "bigfoot community" on its ugly head.
Some support and others show animosity towards it.
I suggest listening to the last couple of interviews. Links are posted in the descriptions on this channel. 

jimmer
1st February 2014, 13:31
Hopefully this is the video you were looking for.
https://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=176280629079415

It would not post, but this address might copy/paste...FB/FB analysis

what a bountiful day, samos.
mike's next encounter and this...
kudos to your resourcefulness.

yes, that's the FBFB analysis video.
pretty darn impressive size authenticating.

the distinctive sas 'gate,' hyper long arms,
the height, the nest constructed by 'torn/broken' limbs
and credibility of the witnesses. (nothing to gain, everything to loose)

to me, the marble mountain event is one
of the best documented and consumable
cases around -- occum's razor, sasquatch style.

now back to another review of mike's latest. so much there...

like I said, what a day.

jimmer
1st February 2014, 14:01
did anyone catch the overarching territorial marking 'X'?
we've seen the smaller marker around the tent.
look at that dominant marker behind the tent. wow.

http://i953.photobucket.com/albums/ae18/jimmerer/ScreenShot2014-02-01atFebruary-1-2014756AM_zpsbec1e843.jpg

samos
1st February 2014, 14:08
"Wow, so much interaction and language there.
It's obvious Nephatia is teaching Mike his language."

No doubt, Frances. We will have fun with this one.

The drawing appears to have the Algiz rune and presumably should turn clockwise (given inverted Algiz). There seems to be language scrawled across the top and middle, although rudimentarily drawn.

Frances
1st February 2014, 14:27
Great screen shot Jimmer I had not noticed it. Looks magical in there.

Good pointer of the Algiz Samos I had not noticed that also.
Frances.