Two Prime Ministers - One Speech - Iraq War 2003

[Sooz]

Wow, Wow, Wow....:ok:

If anyone needs to be convinced our 'leaders' are puppets governed by a higher rule, it is this evidence right here. (Never seen this before).

Two Prime Ministers, one - John Howard, Prime Minister of Australia in 2003. Second - Stephen Harper, Prime Minister of Canada 2003.

Two countries belonging to the Commonwealth of the British Crown.

First speech by Howard on 18 March 2003. Second speech by Harper a couple of days later 20 March 2003

Almost word for word.:shocked:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYfDTsjwE58#t=151
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYfDTsjwE58#t=151

[Spiral]

Thats a good one to chuck at those still asleep, good find Sooz :thup:

[Sooz]

Thats a good one to chuck at those still asleep, good find Sooz :thup:

Those were exactly my thoughts Twirly.

Short, sharp slap.

[Tribe]

This reminds me of what Bill Hicks said , .....when the new president enters the Oval Office he gets shown a photo of the Kennedy assassination and given his agenda and is asked " any questions ? " :garden:

[Sooz]

This reminds me of what Bill Hicks said , .....when the new president enters the Oval Office he gets shown a photo of the Kennedy assassination and given his agenda and is asked " any questions ? " :garden:

I have read time and time again, that there are 39 levels above the President of the USA, in terms of security clearance.

[Calz]

If anyone needs to be convinced our 'leaders' are puppets governed by a higher rule, it is this evidence right here.




Nice.

Not quite as distinctly defined ... but for those who enjoy a bit of an edge for the same message then ...


Same country ...


Two party system (you know ... the illusion of choice) ...


George (the Cowboy Decider) Bush ... vs ... Al (I invented the internet and global warming) Gore ...


Oy ... :fpalm:



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1JSBhI_0at0

[jcocks]

I remember seeing this before, and possibly I even posted it on TOT at the time. It wasn't almost word for word, it *was* word for word. Bona-fide proof of a them answering to a higher power.