PDA

View Full Version : UK Police: Man Arrested On Suspicion of driving motor vehicle whilst under the i....



Altaira
3rd February 2014, 23:10
This made me sad and angry at once as it just confirms that we live in a police state where the police protects corporate interests and bends the laws in their convenience. I know it is not new and it has been like this but this is one of the most recent examples that while people sleep the they've been stripped off their basic rights.



Video! UK Police: Man Arrested On Suspicion of driving motor vehicle whilst under the influence of tea. Did Greater Manchester Police just Pervert the Course of Justice?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=3gxI4ToNKGQ

Yet another cameraman, filming at the Barton Moss Anti Fracking protest site, was today arrested this time on very dubious suspicion of driving under the influence charges after admitting that he had drank a cup of tea in the morning. This footage clearly shows a GMP constable fabricating an admission from the cameraman that he had had two alcoholic drinks.

Worse still though is the list of offences, seen on this video, committed by the constables in the run up to the cameramans arrest, who was not even in a vehicle at the time but in fact was a pedestrian. Barton Moss police unit comes under scrutiny for crass stupidity and unlawful behaviour again

and again the people ask.”Where are Manchesters decent, law abiding ‘Bobbies’?”

...............................


here is the full article http://beforeitsnews.com/the-law/2014/02/video-uk-arrested-on-suspicion-of-driving-a-motor-vehicle-whilst-under-the-influence-of-tea-greater-manchester-police-lose-the-plot-at-barton-moss-2455098.html?currentSplittedPage=1

Here what happened with the cameraman after he was detained.

FOOT NOTE:

An update on events surrounding the cameraman.

“Yes they arrested (kidnapped) and detained the cameraman at a Manchester Police Station (unlawful imprisonment) for approx 10 hours . At the station he again refused consent for a breath test , and subsequently charges were then raised against him for this …. …he was released on bail, but the camera he had been filmimg them with was not released … it was ‘held for evidence purposes’… The case went to court however, at the beginning of the court proceedings it was announced that the charges were being dropped.”

Thus the Courts did not get the opportunity to see the video. But you did………………