araucaria
4th November 2017, 10:35
This thread is the outcome of a moment of awful realization on October 12th while reading Don Wilson’s Our Mysterious Spaceship Moon: Is Our Nearest Neighbour in Space a Huge Alien Spacecraft? published by Sphere Books in 1976. I was alone in a house where the full moon came streaming in, shedding some additional light on my read. This book dates from the Cold War period when the data from the moon landings had just been analyzed. It presents the theory of two scientists, who would be mainstream except that they were Russian; this theory seems to explain ALL the many lunar anomalies in one fell swoop, making it worthy of close attention. You all know some of these; they basically fall into three categories. 1) The Moon is too big, too close, too round, too good at creating total solar eclipses, its orbit too circular... 2) Then there are all the strange sightings over centuries including by famous astronomers: lights, clouds, moving objects... 3) And finally you have the anomalies discovered in the space age: strange soil composition, too old, too metallic, too hollow...
Maybe like me you thought that the theory was of some huge spaceship being cloaked in a few miles of protective rock. Not so: we are talking about a planetoid with its innards scooped out, and placed on the outside. Here is the paragraph or two that caught my attention:
The Moon is so strange (...) that Dr. D.L. Anderson, professor of geophysics and director of the seismological laboratory at Caltech, proposes that “the moon was made inside out.”
We suggest: If the Soviet theory of a hollowed-out world were correct, with the internal Moon materials brought to the surface during the process, the Moon, to our scientists, would seem to be made inside out. Also, the fact that the Moon is deficient in iron except in a layer under its surface, and rich in iron and titanium and similar elements in the maria, fits the Soviet theory that aliens used these materials in the formation of their “spaceship’s” inner hull, and the outer maria patchwork. (p.97)
To explain the last bit, the anomalies include why the maria (seas) are circular, and the answer is because they are the very biggest of the craters. Given also that the large craters are not as deep as they normally should be (coming up against the inner hull), these craters actually did cause damage to the protective shell, hence the need for patching with extra metalling – in excess of excessive.
But what startled me with the passage was the thought, Why does this sound familiar? Where have we seen something like this before? The answer to the second question is very short: here on planet Earth. But the answer to the intuition of familiarity is complex and many-stranded, and is the subject of this thread.
From a standpoint on the surface, Inside out means upside down, and excavation is the means to attain upside-downness. You have a plot of grass, with topsoil underneath and clay under that. Dig a hole and you end up with grass under topsoil with clay on top. If you think we live on a topsy-turvy world, that is literally what the word means. This is where Lewis Carroll’s two metaphors come together: ‘through the looking-glass’ and ‘down the rabbit-hole’ symmetry are one and the same thing.
This being so, let me start with what is really my endpoint, and maybe should be yours. But it is something I have already written about and so it is also my starting-point here. Intuition being precisely the process of jumping to conclusions and working one’s way back, i.e. tackling a problem from the other end, i.e. topsy-turvy thinking, my intuition in this case is based on my earlier conclusion that for a particular agenda, the Earth needed to be mobile, like a giant spaceship. The content of this thread suggests a way how this might work, based on the Moon model.
The reader is referred to my contribution to a thread of Giovonni’s on Avalon, whereby I refuted the notion of an incoming Planet X on the basis that the scenario and timing pointed on the contrary towards one or more planets LEAVING the solar system. Briefly here, I was trying to build on the Thunderbolts theory, based on a combination of archaeological and scientific evidence, of a system of tellurian planets tidally-locked with Saturn as their Sun – tidally-locked as the Moon is with Earth: one lunar revolution = one earth orbit, hence we always get to see the same face. Tidal locking may be the smoking gun evidencing the Moon’s involvement in the above system, as a moon/planet of Saturn. I concluded that to get from the above arrangement of planets to the one we have now, Saturn and its cohort had to enter the solar system from outside. This may have happened through the interference of a binary star, possibly Sirius. Alternatively, Saturn itself may be a self-powered alien spaceship; but we don’t need to go there at this stage.
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?88839-Nibiru-Will-Pass-Earth-Before-November-2017-The-Evidence-w-Investigator-David-Meade&p=1053302&viewfull=1#post1053302
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?88839-Nibiru-Will-Pass-Earth-Before-November-2017-The-Evidence-w-Investigator-David-Meade&p=1053507&viewfull=1#post1053507
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?88839-Nibiru-Will-Pass-Earth-Before-November-2017-The-Evidence-w-Investigator-David-Meade&p=1053827&viewfull=1#post1053827
See also:
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?88150-David-Talbott-The-Electric-Universe-The-Saturn-Sun-Swap-The-Reconstructing-Of-Mythology&p=1044930&viewfull=1#post1044930
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?88150-David-Talbott-The-Electric-Universe-The-Saturn-Sun-Swap-The-Reconstructing-Of-Mythology&p=1044934&viewfull=1#post1044934
The main point to be made at this stage is to see how a spaceship is equatable with an inside-out planetoid. If this is your mindset – say you have actually done this before – then to you, an outside-out planet like planet Earth would be desirable real estate, not for the beautiful planet it is, but for the spaceship conversion potential you see in it. Don WIlson’s book states that the Moon aliens are no longer around, suggesting that the damage to the maria area condemned their ship to the scrapheap. Near the end he mentions an earlier moon that was also in Earth orbit and would have helped with parking the one we know. Wilson’s idea is that the Moon aliens hollowed out that moon and sailed off into the sunset.
Wilson’s theory is a little sloppy in places. Paraphrasing, since the Moon is immensely old and mobile, it will have been to many different places and come here with ‘souvenirs’ in the form of cratering of all sizes and rocks of all ages. It is sloppy because it explains things without really explaining them. The Moon’s passport is full of visas, but illegible ones: we have no idea where it might have travelled. My idea is rather different and suggests possible locations, such as Saturn orbit. In this version, the two moons are more like contractors working shifts on the Earth works. Just as when building a house, you get the builders in first to erect the walls, and they make way for the carpenters and tilers to build a roof, one moves off and the other takes over. Many of the moons of Saturn are also strange, each in their own way, and potentially life-bearing; and the variety is also anomalous, unless they are operating like the butcher, the baker, and the candlestick maker, or different construction trades. Our Luna would not look out of place in their midst.
So I have two puzzle pieces that look as though they might fit together. A candidate planet for mobility, and a blueprint for making planetoids mobile. We already know of two ideas which, being in the realm of conspiracy theory, i.e. implausibly crazy-sounding and plausibly deniable. These are the alleged thousands of miles of underground tunnels, cities etc., and the ‘hollow earth’ theory centred on Antarctica. I don’t dismiss these ideas, but I want to disregard them in the discussion here, because I want to take the topsy-turvy path of following eminently reasonable and factual leads and seeing them in a new light. Things that can’t be hidden but only passed off as trivial and meaningless.
Maybe like me you thought that the theory was of some huge spaceship being cloaked in a few miles of protective rock. Not so: we are talking about a planetoid with its innards scooped out, and placed on the outside. Here is the paragraph or two that caught my attention:
The Moon is so strange (...) that Dr. D.L. Anderson, professor of geophysics and director of the seismological laboratory at Caltech, proposes that “the moon was made inside out.”
We suggest: If the Soviet theory of a hollowed-out world were correct, with the internal Moon materials brought to the surface during the process, the Moon, to our scientists, would seem to be made inside out. Also, the fact that the Moon is deficient in iron except in a layer under its surface, and rich in iron and titanium and similar elements in the maria, fits the Soviet theory that aliens used these materials in the formation of their “spaceship’s” inner hull, and the outer maria patchwork. (p.97)
To explain the last bit, the anomalies include why the maria (seas) are circular, and the answer is because they are the very biggest of the craters. Given also that the large craters are not as deep as they normally should be (coming up against the inner hull), these craters actually did cause damage to the protective shell, hence the need for patching with extra metalling – in excess of excessive.
But what startled me with the passage was the thought, Why does this sound familiar? Where have we seen something like this before? The answer to the second question is very short: here on planet Earth. But the answer to the intuition of familiarity is complex and many-stranded, and is the subject of this thread.
From a standpoint on the surface, Inside out means upside down, and excavation is the means to attain upside-downness. You have a plot of grass, with topsoil underneath and clay under that. Dig a hole and you end up with grass under topsoil with clay on top. If you think we live on a topsy-turvy world, that is literally what the word means. This is where Lewis Carroll’s two metaphors come together: ‘through the looking-glass’ and ‘down the rabbit-hole’ symmetry are one and the same thing.
This being so, let me start with what is really my endpoint, and maybe should be yours. But it is something I have already written about and so it is also my starting-point here. Intuition being precisely the process of jumping to conclusions and working one’s way back, i.e. tackling a problem from the other end, i.e. topsy-turvy thinking, my intuition in this case is based on my earlier conclusion that for a particular agenda, the Earth needed to be mobile, like a giant spaceship. The content of this thread suggests a way how this might work, based on the Moon model.
The reader is referred to my contribution to a thread of Giovonni’s on Avalon, whereby I refuted the notion of an incoming Planet X on the basis that the scenario and timing pointed on the contrary towards one or more planets LEAVING the solar system. Briefly here, I was trying to build on the Thunderbolts theory, based on a combination of archaeological and scientific evidence, of a system of tellurian planets tidally-locked with Saturn as their Sun – tidally-locked as the Moon is with Earth: one lunar revolution = one earth orbit, hence we always get to see the same face. Tidal locking may be the smoking gun evidencing the Moon’s involvement in the above system, as a moon/planet of Saturn. I concluded that to get from the above arrangement of planets to the one we have now, Saturn and its cohort had to enter the solar system from outside. This may have happened through the interference of a binary star, possibly Sirius. Alternatively, Saturn itself may be a self-powered alien spaceship; but we don’t need to go there at this stage.
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?88839-Nibiru-Will-Pass-Earth-Before-November-2017-The-Evidence-w-Investigator-David-Meade&p=1053302&viewfull=1#post1053302
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?88839-Nibiru-Will-Pass-Earth-Before-November-2017-The-Evidence-w-Investigator-David-Meade&p=1053507&viewfull=1#post1053507
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?88839-Nibiru-Will-Pass-Earth-Before-November-2017-The-Evidence-w-Investigator-David-Meade&p=1053827&viewfull=1#post1053827
See also:
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?88150-David-Talbott-The-Electric-Universe-The-Saturn-Sun-Swap-The-Reconstructing-Of-Mythology&p=1044930&viewfull=1#post1044930
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?88150-David-Talbott-The-Electric-Universe-The-Saturn-Sun-Swap-The-Reconstructing-Of-Mythology&p=1044934&viewfull=1#post1044934
The main point to be made at this stage is to see how a spaceship is equatable with an inside-out planetoid. If this is your mindset – say you have actually done this before – then to you, an outside-out planet like planet Earth would be desirable real estate, not for the beautiful planet it is, but for the spaceship conversion potential you see in it. Don WIlson’s book states that the Moon aliens are no longer around, suggesting that the damage to the maria area condemned their ship to the scrapheap. Near the end he mentions an earlier moon that was also in Earth orbit and would have helped with parking the one we know. Wilson’s idea is that the Moon aliens hollowed out that moon and sailed off into the sunset.
Wilson’s theory is a little sloppy in places. Paraphrasing, since the Moon is immensely old and mobile, it will have been to many different places and come here with ‘souvenirs’ in the form of cratering of all sizes and rocks of all ages. It is sloppy because it explains things without really explaining them. The Moon’s passport is full of visas, but illegible ones: we have no idea where it might have travelled. My idea is rather different and suggests possible locations, such as Saturn orbit. In this version, the two moons are more like contractors working shifts on the Earth works. Just as when building a house, you get the builders in first to erect the walls, and they make way for the carpenters and tilers to build a roof, one moves off and the other takes over. Many of the moons of Saturn are also strange, each in their own way, and potentially life-bearing; and the variety is also anomalous, unless they are operating like the butcher, the baker, and the candlestick maker, or different construction trades. Our Luna would not look out of place in their midst.
So I have two puzzle pieces that look as though they might fit together. A candidate planet for mobility, and a blueprint for making planetoids mobile. We already know of two ideas which, being in the realm of conspiracy theory, i.e. implausibly crazy-sounding and plausibly deniable. These are the alleged thousands of miles of underground tunnels, cities etc., and the ‘hollow earth’ theory centred on Antarctica. I don’t dismiss these ideas, but I want to disregard them in the discussion here, because I want to take the topsy-turvy path of following eminently reasonable and factual leads and seeing them in a new light. Things that can’t be hidden but only passed off as trivial and meaningless.