PDA

View Full Version : BOB LAZAR - Cosmic Whistleblower



boja
22nd October 2017, 07:34
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9o99ThB5SQ0

In November of 1989, ROBERT LAZAR took his 1st polygraph test to prove his honesty about the fact that he back-engineered Alien Spacecraft from another world for the United States Military at a secret base called S-4 (near the infamous Area 51).

GEORGE KNAPP (Peabody Award winning Investigative Journalist) broke the story in an attempt to assure the safety of LAZAR. Being a Cosmic Whistleblower has its price, if you're not careful. KNAPP will often say, "VET EVERY SOURCE". Well, LAZAR has been vetted for over 25 years. His story has not changed, altered, or become more elaborate. LAZAR is telling YOU the truth. It's up to you what you DO with that information.

With recent testimony by LAZAR, this short film gives a unique glimpse into the personas surrounding this EPIC saga… the most infamous UFO case of all time. The implications derived from his experiences are just starting to be realized.

WantDisclosure
22nd October 2017, 10:33
What a find!

Fantastic video.

Aragorn
22nd October 2017, 10:50
I could always be wrong — you know, "never say never" — but in my opinion, Bob Lazar is the real deal. This is a guy who already blew the whistle long before the advent of YouTube and CGI videos, and the Deep State (or whatever one could call them) made him pay dearly for that too. :hmm:

WantDisclosure
22nd October 2017, 11:20
I could always be wrong — you know, "never say never" — but in my opinion, Bob Lazar is the real deal. This is a guy who already blew the whistle long before the advent of YouTube and CGI videos, and the Deep State (or whatever one could call them) made him pay dearly for that too. :hmm:

I remember being dismayed at the ridicule thrown at him on Above Top Secret. It seems that people should at least be neutral when claims seem unbelievable, simply because we can't know what we haven't experienced, but that doesn't mean someone else hasn't experienced it.

Dreamtimer
22nd October 2017, 11:34
In my own family, father and brother both regularly say things like "You're crazy" and even "You're stupid" to people they disagree with. The main difference between the two is that my father would acknowledge, after the fact, that someone was actually right. My brother still won't.

End result? He's uninformed about all kinds of stuff, jumps to conclusions, judges people (without having the facts), and has a whole group of friends, families from his community, who are just like him. Well-to-do, cocksure, and sadly ignorant of much.

Criticisms flow easily from such types. They're successful, why should they listen to anyone? That's the attitude. No surprise from me that people are rude on forums. With anonymity it's even easier.

Elen
22nd October 2017, 11:42
I remember being dismayed at the ridicule thrown at him on Above Top Secret. It seems that people should at least be neutral when claims seem unbelievable, simply because we can't know what we haven't experienced, but that doesn't mean someone else hasn't experienced it.

There you go KeepTrying...I agree with every word you said.


In my own family, father and brother both regularly say things like "You're crazy" and even "You're stupid" to people they disagree with. The main difference between the two is that my father would acknowledge, after the fact, that someone was actually right. My brother still won't.

End result? He's uninformed about all kinds of stuff, jumps to conclusions, judges people (without having the facts), and has a whole group of friends, families from his community, who are just like him. Well-to-do, cocksure, and sadly ignorant of much.

Criticisms flow easily from such types. They're successful, why should they listen to anyone? That's the attitude. No surprise from me that people are rude on forums. With anonymity it's even easier.

Yes yes yes...premature conclusions are toxic!

WantDisclosure
22nd October 2017, 11:42
Here is an interesting interview of the filmmaker, Jeremy Corbell:


Published on Jun 15, 2017

Check out this recent radio interview Corbell did about his films Patient Seventeen and his movie on Bob Lazar. It's a fun broadcast and Mike Straus is a great host! Reality Roundhouse is the name of his podcast.

Learn more about Corbell's work at http://www.ExtraordinaryBeliefs.com

I3Ghj8BqvRA

Fred Steeves
22nd October 2017, 12:08
I could always be wrong — you know, "never say never" — but in my opinion, Bob Lazar is the real deal. This is a guy who already blew the whistle long before the advent of YouTube and CGI videos, and the Deep State (or whatever one could call them) made him pay dearly for that too. :hmm:

There are certain names in this small community, ones that I continually see over and over and over through the years, that throw up immediate red flags for me. With Bob Lazar, it's the fact that George Knapp out of Las Vegas broke his story. The pack that Knapp runs with, is IMO responsible for an awful lot of the disinformation, misinformation, and memes that are so well entrenched they are commonly taken as solid gold fact. Either that, or I'm hopelessly lost out in far left field somewhere... :whstl:

But the bottom line is, I see him as the classic gate keeper. Now does that automatically disqualify Bob Lazar as a serious person? No, not necessarily anyway, but it *does* tell me at the very least certain people want that particular story out there.

WantDisclosure
22nd October 2017, 12:30
Here is an interesting interview of the filmmaker, Jeremy Corbell . . .

I can see that this guy Jeremy Corbell is an absolute treasure.

Be sure to check out his website: Extraordinary Beliefs (https://www.extraordinarybeliefs.com/).

Dumpster Diver
22nd October 2017, 20:02
I have Lazar's info as highly probable. The chemistry of element 115 (facts not covered in this video) and the "island of stability" of trans-uranium elements to be intriguing and quite possible.

Dreamtimer
24th October 2017, 13:31
Here's another one. It's three hours long and covers Skinwalker Ranch, Patient 17 and Bob Lazar. (I haven't listened yet)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWbPzQX1lQo

Emil El Zapato
24th October 2017, 17:57
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9o99ThB5SQ0

In November of 1989, ROBERT LAZAR took his 1st polygraph test to prove his honesty about the fact that he back-engineered Alien Spacecraft from another world for the United States Military at a secret base called S-4 (near the infamous Area 51).

GEORGE KNAPP (Peabody Award winning Investigative Journalist) broke the story in an attempt to assure the safety of LAZAR. Being a Cosmic Whistleblower has its price, if you're not careful. KNAPP will often say, "VET EVERY SOURCE". Well, LAZAR has been vetted for over 25 years. His story has not changed, altered, or become more elaborate. LAZAR is telling YOU the truth. It's up to you what you DO with that information.

With recent testimony by LAZAR, this short film gives a unique glimpse into the personas surrounding this EPIC saga… the most infamous UFO case of all time. The implications derived from his experiences are just starting to be realized.

I've always had confidence in Lazar's story but one minor detail has always bugged me. His use of the term, 'back-engineered'. In scientific papers you will never see that term, it's not used by trained engineers and scientists. The correct terminology is 'Reverse-engineered'. I do understand that he was not a 'conventionally' trained engineer so that might explain it. But it really is annoying to see it used in videos and presentations.


I have Lazar's info as highly probable. The chemistry of element 115 (facts not covered in this video) and the "island of stability" of trans-uranium elements to be intriguing and quite possible.

Hi Dumpy,

Ostensibly, element-115 has been defined and created under laboratory conditions or found in nature, I can't really remember which.

Moscovium - Discovered in Russia

Dumpster Diver
24th October 2017, 18:18
I've always had confidence in Lazar's story but one minor detail has always bugged me. His use of the term, 'back-engineered'. In scientific papers you will never see that term, it's not used by trained engineers and scientists. The correct terminology is 'Reverse-engineered'. I do understand that he was not a 'conventionally' trained engineer so that might explain it. But it really is annoying to see it used in videos and presentations.



Hi Dumpy,

Ostensibly, element-115 has been defined and created under laboratory conditions or found in nature, I can't really remember which.

Moscovium - Discovered in Russia

It was one of the radio isotopes, not a stable element (isotope). They have it, but are not lifting the curtain for us.

BTW, we used the term “back engineered” interchangeably with “reverse engineered”, i.e. no difference.

Emil El Zapato
24th October 2017, 19:16
ok, but I don't like the term... :)

Kathy
24th October 2017, 21:10
In the circumstances then, NAP, how will you cope with the term whenever it crosses your horizon?

Emil El Zapato
24th October 2017, 22:55
Like i just did...I complain if i can...if i can't, i just stew and wait for another reason to shut down... :)